| SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ( “ GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and various disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates, which are evaluated on an ongoing basis, utilizing historical experience and other methods considered reasonable under the particular circumstances. Although these estimates are based on management’s best available knowledge at the time, changes in facts and circumstances or discovery of new facts or circumstances may result in revised estimates and actual results may differ from these estimates. Effects on the Partnership’s business, financial position and results of operations resulting from revisions to estimates are recognized when the facts that give rise to the revision become known. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been included. The balance sheet at December 31, 2019 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2019 included in CNX Midstream Partners LP’s (the “Partnership”, or “we”, “us”, or “our”) Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on February 10, 2020. Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Partnership and all of its controlled subsidiaries, including 100% of each of the Anchor Systems and Additional Systems in the applicable periods presented within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Although the Partnership has less than a 100% economic interest in the Additional Systems, it has been consolidated fully with the results of the Partnership in the applicable periods as the Partnership is considered to be the primary beneficiary and has a controlling financial interest and the power through its ownership to direct the activities of the Additional Systems. After adjusting for noncontrolling interests, net income attributable to general and limited partner ownership interests in the Partnership reflect only that portion of net income that is attributable to the Partnership’s unitholders. Transactions between the Partnership and CNX Resources have been identified in the consolidated financial statements as transactions between related parties and are disclosed in Note 4–Related Party Transactions. Revenue Recognition We record revenue when obligations under the terms of the contracts with our shippers are satisfied; generally, this occurs on a daily basis as we gather natural gas at the wellhead. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for providing the natural gas gathering services. Nature of performance obligations At contract inception, we assess the services promised in our contracts with customers and identify a performance obligation for each promised service that is distinct. To identify the performance obligations, we consider all of the services promised in the contract, regardless of whether they are explicitly stated or are implied by customary business practices. Our revenue is generated from natural gas gathering activities. The gas gathering services are interruptible in nature and include charges for the volume of gas actually gathered and do not guarantee access to the system. Volumetric-based fees relate to actual volumes gathered. In general, the interruptible gathering of each unit one million British Thermal Units (MMBtu) of natural gas represents a separate performance obligation. Payment terms for these contracts require payment within 25 days of the end of the calendar month in which the hydrocarbons are gathered. Transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations We are required to disclose the aggregate amount of transaction price that is allocated to performance obligations that have not yet been satisfied. However, the guidance provides certain practical expedients that limit this requirement. Substantially all of our revenues are derived from contracts that have terms of greater than one year. Under these contracts, the interruptible gathering of each unit of natural gas represents a separate performance obligation. For revenue associated with the Shirley-Penns System, for which we have remaining contractual performance obligations, the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to those remaining performance obligations was $350.8 million at March 31, 2020. See Note 4–Related Party Transactions for a detailed breakout of the minimum revenue by year. The amount of revenue associated with this contract up to the minimum volume commitment (“MVC”) is fixed in nature, and volumes that we may gather above the MVC will be variable in nature. As of March 31, 2020, no future performance obligations exist relative to volumes to be gathered in excess of the MVC as the related volumes have not yet been nominated for gathering. Therefore, we have not disclosed the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for the variable aspect of this agreement, nor have we disclosed the value of other unsatisfied performance obligations that are variable in nature. Prior-period performance obligations We record revenue when obligations under the terms of the contracts with our shippers are satisfied; generally this occurs on a daily basis when we gather gas at the wellhead. In some cases, we are required to estimate the amount of natural gas that we have gathered during an accounting period and record any differences between our estimates and the actual units of natural gas that we gathered in the following month. We have existing internal controls for our revenue estimation process and related accruals; historically, any identified differences between our revenue estimates and actual revenue received have not been significant. For the quarters ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, revenue recognized in the reporting period related to performance obligations satisfied in prior reporting periods was not material. Disaggregation of revenue See Note 8–Segment Information for additional information. Contract balances We invoice customers once our performance obligations have been satisfied, at which point payment becomes unconditional. Accordingly, our contracts with customers do not give rise to contract assets or liabilities. We also have no contract assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer. Classification The fees we charge our affiliates, including our Sponsor, are recorded in gathering revenue — related party in our consolidated statements of operations. Fees from midstream services we perform for third-party shippers are recorded in gathering revenue — third-party in our consolidated statements of operations. Cash Cash includes cash on hand and on deposit at banking institutions. Receivables On January 1, 2020, the Partnership adopted the guidance under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2016-13 Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. The Partnership adopted Topic 326 using the prospective transition method. Prior to adopting Topic 326, the Partnership reserved for specific accounts receivable when it was probable that all or a part of an outstanding balance would not be collected, such as customer bankruptcies. Collectability was determined based on terms of sale, credit status of customers and various other circumstances. We regularly reviewed collectability and established or adjusted the reserve as necessary using the specific identification method. Account balances were charged off against the reserve after all means of collection had been exhausted and the potential for recovery was considered remote. Under Topic 326, management recorded an allowance for credit losses related to the collectability of third-party customers receivables using the historical aging of the customer receivable balance. Related party receivables between entities under common control are excluded from Topic 326. The collectibility was determined based on past events, including historical experience, customer credit rating, as well as current market conditions. We will continue to monitor customer ratings and collectability on a quarterly basis. Account balances will be charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The allowance for credit losses is as follows: (in thousands) March 31, 2020 Receivables — Third-Party $ 5,056 Allowance for Credit Losses (76) Receivables — Third-Party, Net $ 4,980 Fair Value Measurement The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, clarifies the definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This guidance also relates to all nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed on a recurring basis (e.g., the initial recognition of asset retirement obligations and impairments of long-lived assets). The fair value is the price that we estimate we would receive upon selling an asset or that we would pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize input to valuation techniques used to estimate fair value. An asset or liability subject to the fair value requirements is categorized within the hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The highest priority (Level 1) is given to unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, and the lowest priority (Level 3) is given to unobservable inputs. Level 2 inputs are data, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. The carrying values on our balance sheets of our current assets, current liabilities and revolving credit facility approximate fair values due to their short maturities. We estimate the fair value of our long-term debt, which is not actively traded, using an income approach model that utilizes a discount rate based on market rates for other debt with similar remaining time to maturity and credit risk (Level 2). The estimated fair value of our long-term debt was approximately $280.0 million on March 31, 2020. Property and Equipment Property and equipment is recorded at cost upon acquisition and is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the assets’ estimated useful lives or over the lease terms of the assets. Expenditures which extend the useful lives of existing property and equipment are capitalized. When properties are retired or otherwise disposed, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and any gain or loss on disposition is recognized. The Partnership evaluates whether long-lived assets have been impaired during any given quarter and has processes in place to ensure that we become aware of such indicators. Impairment indicators may include, but are not limited to, sustained decreases in commodity prices, a decline in customer well results and lower throughput forecasts, and increases in construction or operating costs. For such long-lived assets, impairment exists when the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets exceeds our estimates of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset or group of assets. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset(s) is not recoverable, based on the estimated future undiscounted cash flows, the impairment loss would be measured as the excess of the asset’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value. In the event that impairment indicators exist, we conduct an impairment test. Fair value represents the estimated price between market participants to sell an asset in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset, based on assumptions a market participant would make. When warranted, management assesses the fair value of long-lived assets using commonly accepted techniques and may use more than one source in making such assessments. Sources used to determine fair value include, but are not limited to, recent third-party comparable sales, internally developed discounted cash flow analyses and analyses from outside advisors. Significant changes, such as the condition of an asset or management’s intent to utilize the asset, generally require management to reassess the cash flows related to long-lived assets. No property and equipment impairments were identified during the periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Leases In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02–Leases (Topic 842), which increases transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing right-of-use (“ROU”) lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The ASU maintains a distinction between finance leases and operating leases, which is substantially similar to the classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases and operating leases in the previous lease guidance. Retaining this distinction allows the recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease to remain similar to the previous accounting treatment. A lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset to exclude from balance sheet recognition any lease assets and lease liabilities with a term of 12 months or less, and instead to recognize lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. For both financing and operating leases, the ROU asset and lease liability are initially measured at the present value of the lease payments. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11 which provides entities with the option to initially apply the new lease standard at the adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption, if necessary. We determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease ROU assets and accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at the commencement date. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date of the lease in determining the present value of future payments. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives and initial direct costs incurred. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Environmental Matters We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are expensed. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments and/or clean-ups are probable, and the costs can be reasonably estimated. At this time, we are unable to assess the timing and/or effect of potential liabilities related to greenhouse gas emissions or other environmental issues. As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, we had no material environmental matters that required the recognition of a separate liability or specific disclosure. Asset Retirement Obligations Our gathering pipelines and compressor stations have an indeterminate life. If properly maintained, they will operate for an indeterminate period as long as supply and demand for natural gas exists, which we expect for the foreseeable future. We are under no legal or contractual obligation to restore or dismantle our gathering system upon abandonment. Therefore, we have not recorded any liabilities for asset retirement obligations at March 31, 2020 or December 31, 2019. Variable Interest Entities Each of the Anchor and Additional Systems is structured as a limited partnership (the “ Limited Partnerships”) and a variable interest entity ( “ VIE”). These VIEs correspond with the manner in which we report our segment information in Note 8–Segment Information, which also includes information regarding the Partnership’s involvement with each of these VIEs and their relative contributions to our financial position, operating results and cash flows. The Partnership fully consolidates each of the Limited Partnerships through its ownership of CNX Midstream Operating Company LLC (the “ Operating Company”). The Operating Company, through its general partner ownership interest in each of the Limited Partnerships during the period in which any ownership interest exists, is considered to be the primary beneficiary for accounting purposes and has the power to direct all substantive strategic and day-to-day operational decisions of the Limited Partnerships. Income Taxes We are treated as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes, with each partner being separately taxed on its share of the Partnership’s taxable income. Accordingly, no provision for federal or state income taxes has been recorded in the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements for any period presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Equity Compensation Equity compensation expense for all unit-based compensation awards is based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718–Compensation–Stock Compensation. We recognize unit-based compensation costs on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of an award, which is generally the same as the award’s vesting term. See Note 9–Long-Term Incentive Plan for further discussion. Net Income Per Limited Partner Unit and General Partner Interest Net income per limited partner unit is calculated using the two-class method, under which income is allocated to participating securities in accordance with the terms of our partnership agreement. The two-class method uses an earnings allocation method under which earnings per limited partner unit are calculated for each class of common unit and any participating security considering all distributions declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings as if all earnings had been distributed during the period. Diluted net income per limited partner unit reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or agreements to issue common units were exercised, settled or converted into common units. Prior to the IDR Elimination Transaction on January 29, 2020, we allocated net income between our general partner and limited partners, which included allocations of net income to our limited partners, our general partner and the holders of our IDRs in accordance with the terms of our partnership agreement. We also allocated any distributions in excess of earnings for the period to our general partner and our limited partners based on their respective proportionate ownership interests in us, after taking into account distributions to be paid with respect to the IDRs, as set forth in our partnership agreement. Following the IDR Elimination Transaction, the Partnership’s common unitholders are entitled to all distributions until the Class B units are converted to common units on January 1, 2022. Class B unitholders have no rights to distributions until they are converted into common units. Historical Earnings per Unit The Partnership calculates historical earnings per unit under the two-class method and allocates the earnings or losses of a transferred business before the date of a dropdown transaction entirely to the general partner. If applicable, the previously reported earnings per unit of the limited partners would not change as a result of a dropdown transaction. Diluted net income per limited partner unit reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or agreements to issue common units, such as awards under the long-term incentive plan, were exercised, settled or converted into common units. When it is determined that potential common units resulting from an award subject to performance or market conditions should be included in the diluted net income per limited partner unit calculation, the impact is calculated by applying the treasury stock method. There were 200,086 and 34,566 phantom units that were not included in the calculation for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, because the effect would have been antidilutive. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04 - Reference Rate Reform - Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (Topic 848). This ASU provides optional expedient and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. In response to the concerns about structural risks of interbank offered rates and, particularly, the risk of cessation of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), regulators in several jurisdictions around the world have undertaken reference rate reform initiatives to identify alternative reference rates that are more observable or transaction based and less susceptible to manipulation. The ASU provides companies with optional guidance to ease the potential accounting burden associated with transitioning away from reference rates that are expected to be discontinued. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The Partnership is still evaluating the effect of adopting this guidance. |
