SHELL MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, L.P.
150 N. Dairy Ashford Rd.
Houston, Texas 77079
September 12, 2022
VIA EDGAR
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
Office of Mergers and Acquisitions
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549-6010
Attention: Daniel Duchovny
Re: | Shell Midstream Partners, L.P. |
| Schedule 13E-3 filed by Shell Midstream Partners, L.P., Shell Midstream Partners GP LLC, |
| Semisonic Enterprises LLC, and Shell Midstream LP Holdings LLC, and Shell USA, Inc. |
| Shell Midstream Partners, L.P. |
| Preliminary Information Statement on Schedule 14C |
Dear Mr. Duchovny:
This letter sets forth the responses of Shell Midstream Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”) and the other filing persons named in the above-referenced Schedule 13E-3 (the “Schedule 13E-3”) to the comments from the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) contained in the Staff’s letter dated September 6, 2022 (the “Comment Letter”) with respect to the Schedule 13E-3 and the information statement attached thereto as Exhibit (a)(1) (the “Preliminary Information Statement”). In response to the comments set forth in the Comment Letter, the Partnership and the other filing persons have revised the Schedule 13E-3 and the Preliminary Information Statement and are filing Amendment No. 1 to the Schedule 13E-3, attaching as Exhibit (a)(1) thereto the amended information statement (the “Amended Information Statement”).
In addition, we are providing the following responses to the Comment Letter. For your convenience, we have set forth each comment of the Staff from the Comment Letter in bold below and provided our response below each comment. All references to page numbers and captions correspond to the Amended Information Statement (except for such page numbers and captions included in the Staff’s transposed comments), and all capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meaning given to such terms in the Amended Information Statement.
Preliminary Information Statement
Reasons for Approval of the Merger Agreement
1. | We note that the GP Board based its fairness determination in part on the recommendation of the Conflicts Committee. We also note that the Conflicts Committee considered the Intrepid opinion. Note that if any filing person has based its fairness determination on the analysis of factors undertaken by others, such person must expressly adopt this analysis and discussion as their own in order to satisfy the disclosure obligation. See Question 20 of Exchange Act Release No. 34-17719 (April 13, 1981). Thus, please revise to state, if true, that the GP Board adopted the Conflicts Committee analyses and conclusion as its |