Future sales of our Class A Common Stock could cause our stock price to decline.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our Class A Common Stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales might occur, may reduce the prevailing market price of our Class A Common Stock and make more difficult for you to sell your Class A Common Stock at a time and price that you deem appropriate. In addition, any sales of securities by us or existing stockholders could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our Class A Common Stock.
If we fail to satisfy all applicable Nasdaq continued listing requirements, including the $1.00 minimum closing bid price requirement, our Class A Common Stock may be delisted from Nasdaq, which could have an adverse impact on the liquidity and market price of our Class A Common Stock.
Our Class A Common Stock is currently listed on Nasdaq, which has qualitative and quantitative continued listing requirements, including corporate governance requirements, public float requirements and the $1.00 minimum closing bid price requirement. Recently, our Class A Common Stock has traded at closing bid prices below $1.00. If our Class A Common Stock trades at closing bid prices below $1.00 for a period in excess of 30 consecutive business days, or if we are unable to satisfy any other continued listing requirement, Nasdaq may take steps to delist our Class A Common Stock. We would then evaluate our options to restore compliance with the applicable continued listing requirement, which options may include pursuing a reverse stock split to restore compliance with the $1.00 minimum closing bid price requirement. A delisting of our Class A Common Stock could adversely affect the market liquidity of our Class A Common Stock, decrease the market price of our Class A Common Stock and adversely affect our ability to obtain financing for the continuation of our operations.
Risks Related to Intellectual Property
We may be subject to various litigation claims and legal proceedings, including intellectual property litigation, such as patent infringement claims, which could adversely affect our business.
We, as well as certain of our directors and officers, may be subject to claims or lawsuits. These lawsuits may result in significant legal fees and expenses and could divert management’s time and other resources. If the claims contained in these lawsuits are successfully asserted against us, we could be liable for damages and be required to alter or cease certain of our business practices or product lines. Any of these outcomes could cause our business, financial performance and cash position to be negatively impacted.
Additionally, our commercial success will also depend, in part, on not infringing on the patents or proprietary rights of others. There can be no assurance that the technologies and products used or developed by us will not infringe such rights. If such infringement occurs and we are not able to obtain a license from the relevant third party, we will not be able to continue the development, manufacture, use, or sale of any such infringing technology or product. There can be no assurance that necessary licenses to third-party technology will be available at all or on commercially reasonable terms. In some cases, litigation or other proceedings may be necessary to defend against or assert claims of infringement or to determine the scope and validity of the proprietary rights of third parties. Any potential litigation could result in substantial costs to, and diversion of, our resources and could have a material and adverse impact on us.
An adverse outcome in any such litigation or proceeding could subject us to significant liabilities, require us to cease using the subject technology or require us to license the subject technology from the third party, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
On January 5, 2015, Wicab sued the Company, NHC, Mitch Tyler, a director of the Company and NHC and Yuri Danilov, a former director of the Company and a director of NHC, and ANR, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. ANR is the licensor to the Company of three issued patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 8,849,407 and 8,909,345 and 9,020,612) and other patents pending related to neurostimulation methods and devices.
S-9