![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/8-K/0001193125-22-208791/g385263g0729220429796.jpg)
On a per share basis, net loss (based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding over the period) was $(0.35) and $(0.56) for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
For the six months ended June 30, 2022, net loss was $(39.7) million and $(39.5) million under U.S. GAAP and IFRS, respectively. Net loss per share was $(0,66) under U.S. GAAP and $(0.65) under IFRS.
Monthly Information Regarding the Total Number of Voting Rights and Total Number of Shares of the Company as of June 30, 2022:
(Article 223-16 of the General Regulations of the Autorité des Marchés Financiers)
| | | | |
| | |
Date | | Total number of shares | | Total number of voting rights |
| | |
06/30/2022 | | 94,022,679 | | Total gross of voting rights: 94,022,679 |
| Total net* of voting rights: 93,916,392 |
* | Total net = total number of voting rights attached to shares – shares without voting rights |
The PIPE financing DBV completed in June included the sale of prefunded warrants to purchase up to 28,276,331 ordinary shares. The pre-funded warrants are not included in the number of shares outstanding. If all 28,276,331 pre-funded warrants were exercised, the total number of DBV shares outstanding would be 122,299,010.
Class Action Complaint:
As previously disclosed, a class action complaint was filed in January 2019 in the U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey, alleging that the Company and certain current and former executive officers violated certain U.S. federal securities laws. Plaintiffs filed a Third Amended Complaint on September 30, 2021. On July 29, 2022, the Court entered an order granting the Company’s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint with prejudice. The Court indicated that the Third Amended Complaint was deficient in a number of ways, failing to allege a violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and ordered the matter closed. Per court procedural rules, the Plaintiffs have 30 days to appeal the dismissal of the Third Amended Complaint. The Company believes that the allegations contained in the complaint are without merit and will continue to defend the case vigorously.