Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Use of Estimates The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates include those related to the evaluation of our ability to continue as a going concern, best estimate of standalone selling price of revenue deliverables, allowance for doubtful accounts, long-lived assets, income taxes, assumptions used in the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) model to calculate the fair value of stock-based compensation, assumptions used in the Monte Carlo Simulation (“MSM”) model to calculate the fair value of warrants, deferred tax asset valuation allowances, valuation of the Company’s common and convertible preferred stock, preclinical study and clinical trial accruals. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Concentrations Credit Risk The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are maintained at financial institutions in the United States of America. Deposits held by these institutions may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Customer Risk For the year ended December 31, 2019, one customer accounted for 100% of total revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2018, two customers accounted for 58% and 42% of total revenue. Both of the Company’s customers are located in the United States. As of December 31, 2019, there was no accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2018, two customers accounted for 60% and 40% of total accounts receivable. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist primarily of checking account and money market account balances. Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The Company considers the credit worthiness of its customers but does not require collateral in advance of a sale. The Company evaluates collectability and maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses inherent in its accounts receivable portfolio when necessary. The allowance is based on the Company’s best estimate of the amount of losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable, which is based on customer creditworthiness, facts and circumstances specific to outstanding balances, and payment terms. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. As of December 31, 2019, and 2018, there were no allowances for doubtful accounts. Property and Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally between three and five years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statement of operations in the period realized. Intangible Assets Intangible assets are recorded at cost and amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset. Intangible assets consist of licenses with various institutions whereby the Company has rights to use intangible property obtained from such institutions. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability is measured by comparison of the carrying amount to the future undiscounted net cash flows which the assets are expected to generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment is measured by the excess of the carrying amount of the assets over fair value less the costs to sell the assets, generally determined using the projected discounted future net cash flows arising from the asset. There have been no such impairments of long-lived assets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. Revenue Recognition Effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), using the modified retrospective method. Under this method, results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2019 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition (“ASC 605”). The Company only had one contract, the CFF Agreement, within the scope of ASC 606 as of the adoption date. The cumulative-effect of adopting ASC 606 on January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective method, was immaterial. ASC 606 applies to all contracts with customers, except for contracts that are within the scope of other standards, such as leases, insurance, collaboration arrangements and financial instruments. See Note 6 for details of the collaboration, development and license agreements. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that the Company determines are within the scope of ASC 606, the Company performs the following five steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue at a point in time, or over time, as the entity satisfies performance obligations. The Company only applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that it will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the goods or services it transfers to the customer. At contract inception, once the contract is determined to be within the scope of ASC 606, the Company assesses the goods or services promised within each contract, determines those that are performance obligations, and assesses whether each promised good or service is distinct. The Company then recognizes as revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied. As part of the accounting for customer arrangements, the Company must use judgment to determine: a) the number of performance obligations based on the determination under step (ii) above; b) the transaction price under step (iii) above; and c) the standalone selling price for each performance obligation identified in the contract for the allocation of the transaction price in step (iv) above. The Company uses judgment to determine whether milestones or other variable consideration should be included in the transaction price. The transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price basis. In developing the standalone price for a performance obligation, the Company considers applicable market conditions and relevant entity-specific factors, including factors that were contemplated in negotiating the agreement with the customer and estimated costs. The Company recognizes revenue as or when the performance obligations under the contract are satisfied. The Company receives payments from its customers based on payment schedules established in each contract. The Company records any amounts received prior to satisfying the revenue recognition criteria as deferred revenue on its consolidated balance sheet. Amounts recognized as revenue, but not yet received or invoiced are recorded within other receivables on the consolidated balance sheet. Amounts are recorded as other receivables on the consolidate balance sheet when our right to consideration is unconditional. The Company does not assess whether a contract has a significant financing component if the expectation at contract inception is such that the period between payment by the customer and the transfer of a majority of the promised goods or services to the customer will be one year or less. The Company only had one contract within the scope of ASC 606 upon adoption that had not been completed, the CFF Agreement. The most significant changes under ASC 606 relate to the Company’s determination of the transaction price at inception, determination of the standalone selling price for the performance obligation and at each reporting period the treatment of variable consideration in the form of milestone payments under the CFF Agreement. Under ASC 606, the Company is recognizing the revenue allocated to the one performance obligation measuring progress using the input (cost-to-cost) method, limited by the variable consideration attributed to the probable completion of certain milestones as defined in the CFF Agreement. The cumulative-effect of adopting ASC 606 on January 1, 2019 was immaterial. Under ASC 605, the Company recognized revenue under the milestone method up to the limit of the prior approval funding amounts, and when the Company determined that it had earned the right to receive the recognized portion according to the terms of the grant awarded. The upfront payment of $200,000 was recognized straight-line over the term of the contract as the Company believed the upfront fee related to services performed throughout the contract period and the upfront fee did not represent a substantive milestone within the agreement. Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018, was recognized in accordance with ASC 605 which required that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred and title and the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the client or services have been rendered; (3) the price is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. During 2018, revenue includes grant awards and collaboration services entered into for specific research and development efforts. The Company recognized revenue under such awards and contracts as the related qualified research and development expenses were incurred or under the milestone method, up to the limit of the prior approval funding amounts, and when we had determined that we earned the right to receive the recognized portion according to the terms of the original grant awarded. Contract Assets The incremental costs of obtaining a contract under ASC 606 (i.e. costs that would not have been incurred if the contract had not been obtained) are recognized as an asset in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet if the Company expects to recover them. Management expects that the incremental fees paid to third-parties as a result of obtaining the License Agreement are recoverable and therefore the Company capitalized them as contract costs, current and noncurrent, in its consolidated balance sheet (see Note 6). Capitalized costs will be amortized to the respective expenses using a systematic basis that mirrors the pattern in which the Company transfers control of the goods and service to the customer. At each reporting date, the Company determines whether or not the capitalized costs to obtain a contract are impaired by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the remaining amount of consideration that the Company received and expects to receive less the costs that relate to providing services under the relevant contract. For the year ended December 31, 2019, there was no amortization of the contract assets and there have been no impairments as of December 31, 2019. Deferred Revenue Amounts received prior to satisfying the above revenue recognition criteria, or in which the Company has an unconditional right to payment, are recorded as deferred revenue in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company has estimated the classification between current and noncurrent deferred revenue related to the respective license agreement within its consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2019 (see Note 6). Costs for Collaborative Arrangements Costs incurred under collaborative arrangements include personnel costs, laboratory supplies and fees paid to third parties. These amounts are included in research and development in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company had incurred expenses of approximately $604,000, related to its collaborative arrangement. The Company’s collaborative arrangement was terminated in 2018 therefore no related expenses in 2019. Research and Development Research and development costs are expensed to operations as incurred. Our research and development expenses consist primarily of: · salaries and related overhead expenses, which include stock-based compensation and benefits for personnel in research and development functions; · fees paid to consultants and contract research organizations, or CROs, including in connection with our preclinical studies and clinical trials and other related clinical trial fees, such as for investigator grants, patient screening, laboratory work, clinical trial material management and statistical compilation and analyses; · costs related to acquiring and manufacturing clinical trial materials; · costs related to compliance with regulatory requirements; and · payments related to licensed products and technologies. Costs for certain development activities are recognized based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks using information and data provided to us by our vendors and clinical sites. Nonrefundable advance payments for goods or services to be received in future periods for use in research and development activities are deferred and capitalized. The capitalized amounts are then expensed as the related goods are delivered or when the services are performed. Stock-Based Compensation Effective January 1, 2019, the Company early adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-07, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting . The Company recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based awards based on the grant-date estimated fair values, which the Company determines using the BSM option pricing model, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the award. Prior to the adoption of ASU No. 2018-07, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation arrangements with nonemployees by recording the expense of such services based on the estimated fair value of the common stock at the measurement date. The value of the equity instrument, including adjustment to fair value at each balance sheet date for the vested awards, is charged to operations over the term of the service agreement as earned. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur. The BSM option pricing model incorporates various highly sensitive assumptions, including the fair value of our common stock, expected volatility, expected term and risk-free interest rates. The weighted average expected life of options was calculated using the simplified method as prescribed by the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin, Topic 14 (“SAB Topic 14”). This decision was based on the lack of relevant historical data due to our limited historical experience. In addition, due to our limited historical data, the estimated volatility also reflects the application of SAB Topic 14, incorporating the historical volatility of comparable companies whose stock prices are publicly available. The risk-free interest rate for the periods within the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant. The dividend yield was zero, as we have never declared or paid dividends and have no plans to do so in the foreseeable future. Prior to the completion of the Company’s initial public offering of common stock on August 16, 2018, due to the absence of a public market trading for the Company’s common stock, it was necessary to estimate the fair value of the common stock underlying the Company’s stock-based awards when performing fair value calculations. Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized. The Company assesses all material positions taken in any income tax return, including all significant uncertain positions, in all tax years that are still subject to assessment or challenge by the relevant taxing authorities. Assessing an uncertain tax position begins with the initial determination of the positions sustainability and is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. At each balance sheet date, unresolved uncertain tax positions must be reassessed, and the Company will determine whether (i) the factors underlying the sustainability assertion have changed and (ii) the amount of the recognized benefit is still appropriate. The recognition and measurement of tax benefits requires significant judgment. Judgments concerning the recognition and measurement of a tax benefit might change as new information becomes available. Comprehensive Loss The Company has no items of comprehensive income or loss other than net loss. Loss Per Share Basic loss per common share is calculated by dividing net loss available to common stockholders for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, without consideration for potentially dilutive securities. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss, adjusted for any preferred dividends, available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares and potentially dilutive securities outstanding for the period. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, there is no difference in the number of shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share due to the Company’s net loss position. The following tables presents the computation of the basic and diluted net loss per share available to common stockholders (in thousands, except share and per share data): Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 Numerator: Net loss available to common stockholders (basic and diluted) $ (29,681) $ (23,462) Denominator: Weighted-average shares of common stock (basic and diluted) 8,458,277 3,146,632 Basic and diluted net loss per share $ (3.51) $ (7.45) The following potentially dilutive securities were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share available to common stockholders for the periods presented because including them would have been antidilutive: Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 Stock options to purchase common stock 1,380,312 825,205 Common stock warrants 1,733,322 1,966,930 3,113,634 2,792,135 JOBS Act Accounting Election The JOBS Act permits an “emerging growth company” such as us to take advantage of an extended transition period to comply with new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies. We are choosing to take advantage of this provision and, as a result, we will adopt the extended transition period available under the JOBS Act until the earlier of the date we (i) are no longer an emerging growth company or (ii) affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the extended transition period provided under the JOBS Act. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements adopted during the year ended December 31, 2019 Accounting Standards Update 2014-09 In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014-09, which amends the guidance for accounting for revenue from contracts with customers. This ASU supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition (“ASC 605”) , and creates ASC 606. In 2015 and 2016, the FASB issued additional ASUs related to ASC 606 that delayed the effective date of the guidance and clarified various aspects of the new revenue guidance, including principal versus agent considerations, identifying performance obligations, and licensing, and they include other improvements and practical expedients. Companies have the option of applying this new guidance retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (the full retrospective method) or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying this update recognized at the date of initial application (the modified retrospective method). For public entities, ASC 606 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal year. As a result of the Company having elected the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act, ASC 606 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2019, and all interim periods thereafter. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2019. The Company only had one contract, the CFF Agreement, within the scope of ASC 606 as of the adoption date. The cumulative-effect of adopting ASC 606 on January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective method, was immaterial. Accounting Standards Update 2018-07 and 2019-08 In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation—Stock Compensation (ASC 718), Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which is intended to simplify the accounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions by expanding the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-08, Compensation—Stock Compensation (ASC 718) and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), Improvements to Share-Based Consideration Payable to a Customer, which requires that an entity measure and classify share-based payment awards granted to a customer by applying the guidance in ASC 718. For public entities, ASU 2018-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. As a result of the Company having elected the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act, ASU 2018-07 is effective for the Company for the year ending on December 31, 2020, and all interim periods within. Early adoption is permitted. For entities that have adopted the amendments in ASU 2018-07, the amendments in ASU 2019-08 are effective in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and all interim periods within. An entity may early adopt the amendments in ASU 2019-08, but not before it adopts the amendments in ASU 2018-07. The Company early adopted ASU 2018-07 on January 1, 2019 and ASU 2019-08 on July 1, 2019. The adoption of these standards did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements not yet adopted as of December 31, 2019 Accounting Standards Update 2016-02 and 2018-11 In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (ASC 842) . In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvements to ASC 842, Leases , which provides clarification to ASU 2016-02. These ASUs (collectively, the new lease standard) require an entity to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset on the balance sheet for leases with lease terms of more than twelve months. Lessor accounting is largely unchanged, while lessees will no longer be provided with a source of off-balance sheet financing. Initial guidance required the adoption of the new lease standard using the modified retrospective transition method. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (ASC 842)—Targeted Improvements , which allows entities to elect an optional transition method where entities may continue to apply the existing lease guidance during the comparative periods and apply the new lease requirements through a cumulative effect adjustment in the period of adoptions rather than in the earliest period presented. In March 2019, FASB issued ASU 2019-01, Codification improvements , which provides clarification on implementation issued associated with adopting ASU 2016-02. ASU 2019-01 enhances the guidance in ASC 842 surrounding the fair value of underlying assets for lessors, presentation of sales-type and direct financing leases on the statement of cash flows, and transition guidance surrounding accounting changes and error corrections. This guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. In November 2019, the FASB deferred the effective date for adopting the leasing standard updates for private companies, not-for-profit organizations, and smaller reporting companies. As a result of the Company having elected the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act, the new leasing standard updates would be effective for the Company for the year ended December 31, 2021, and all interim periods within the year ended December 31, 2022, due to its option to defer the adoption of new accounting standards under the JOBS Act. Early adoption is permitted. While the Company continues to review its current accounting policies and practices to identify potential differences that would result from applying the new guidance, the Company expects that its non-cancellable operating lease commitments with a term of more than twelve months will be subject to the new guidance and recognized as right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets upon adoption. The Company expects to elect transitional practical expedients such that the Company will not need to reassess whether contracts are leases and will retain lease classification and initial direct costs for leases existing prior to the adoption of the new lease standard. Accounting Standards Update 2016-13 In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “ Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (ASC 326) ”, which is intended to provide financial statement users with more useful information about expected credit losses on financial assets held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. The new standard replaces the existing incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology that requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable forward-looking information to estimate all expected credit losses. For public business entities, ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2020. As a result of the Company having elected the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act, ASU 2016-13 is effective for the Company for the fiscal year ending on December 31, 2022, and all interim periods within. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-13 to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements and disclosures. Accounting Standards Update 2019-12 In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “ Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (ASC 740) ”, which removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and improves consistent application of and simplifies U.S. GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. For public entities, the ASU 2019-12 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2020. As a result of the Company having elected the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act, ASU 2019-12 is effective for the Company for the fiscal year ending on December 31, 2022, and all interim periods within. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements. |