Fenix Parts (FENX) 10-Q 21 Feb 17 2016 Q2 Quarterly report Financial data

Document and Entity Information

Document and Entity Information - shares	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016	Feb. 16, 2017
Document And Entity Information [Abstract]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2016
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2,016
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2
Trading Symbol	FENX
Entity Registrant Name	Fenix Parts, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	1,615,153
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Non-accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding (in shares)		20,141,941

Unaudited Condensed Consolidate

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 1,243	$ 2,827
Accounts receivable, net of allowance $426 and $460	6,968	6,834
Inventories, net	33,227	38,892
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	911	545
Total current assets	42,349	49,098
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment	13,860	13,103
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	(2,570)	(1,494)
Property and equipment, net	11,290	11,609
OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Goodwill	37,575	76,812
Intangible assets, net	34,300	33,786
Indemnification receivables	2,562	5,078
Other non-current assets	3,481	3,455
TOTAL ASSETS	131,570	179,838
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	3,700	3,456
Accrued expenses	2,361	2,847
Contingent consideration liabilities - current	8,972	9,345
Current debt under credit facility, net of issuance costs	21,673	793
Other current liabilities	2,164	1,728
Total current liabilities	38,870	18,169
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Deferred warranty revenue, net of current portion	435	227
Long-term related party obligations, net of current portion	1,086	2,071
Long-term debt under credit facility, net of current portion	0	19,645
Contingent consideration liabilities, net of current portion	0	6,085
Deferred income tax liabilities	11,784	15,624
Reserve for uncertain tax positions	3,075	5,733
Other non-current liabilities	2,862	2,500
Total non-current liabilities	19,242	51,885
TOTAL LIABILITIES	58,112	70,054
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 19,956,907 and 19,926,868 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively	20	20
Additional paid-in capital	138,424	136,398
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(2,630)	(4,247)
Accumulated deficit	(70,756)	(30,787)
Total Fenix Parts, Inc. shareholders’ equity before noncontrolling interest	65,058	101,384
Noncontrolling interest	8,400	8,400
Total shareholders’ equity	73,458	109,784
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$ 131,570	$ 179,838

Unaudited Condensed Consolidat3

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable	$ 426	$ 460
Common stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock, shares authorized	30,000,000	30,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	19,956,907	19,926,868
Common stock, shares outstanding	19,956,907	19,926,868

Unaudited Condensed Consolidat4

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income/(Loss) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015
Income Statement [Abstract]
Net revenues	$ 34,234	$ 11,471	$ 66,416	$ 11,471
Cost of goods sold	20,760	10,008	37,842	10,008
Gross profit	13,474	1,463	28,574	1,463
Selling, general and administrative expenses	12,241	6,764	24,605	6,713
Outside service and professional fees	1,156	864	3,341	3,413
Depreciation and amortization	1,155	709	2,362	709
Change in fair value of contingent consideration liabilities	(2,977)	809	(6,982)	809
Change in indemnification receivable	427	0	2,516	0
Goodwill impairment	0	0	45,300	0
Operating income (loss)	1,472	(7,683)	(42,568)	(10,181)
Interest expense	(500)	(22)	(755)	(22)
Other income (expense), net	151	(1,573)	243	(1,704)
Income (loss) before income tax benefit	1,123	(9,278)	(43,080)	(11,907)
Benefit for income taxes	(270)	(5,304)	(3,111)	(5,304)
Net income (loss)	1,393	(3,974)	(39,969)	(6,603)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(9)	(705)	1,617	(705)
Net comprehensive income (loss)	$ 1,384	$ (4,679)	$ (38,352)	$ (7,308)
Earnings (loss) per share available to common shareholders:
Earnings/(loss) per share, Basic (in dollars per share)	$ 0.07	$ (0.33)	$ (1.92)	$ (0.91)
Earnings/(loss) per share, Diluted (in dollars per share)	$ 0.07	$ (0.33)	$ (1.92)	$ (0.91)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Weighted average common shares outstanding, Basic (in dollars per share)	19,799,664	11,388,524	19,732,005	7,003,537
Weighted average common shares outstanding, Diluted (in dollars per share)	19,971,437	11,388,524	19,732,005	7,003,537
Dividends paid (in dollars per share)	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0

Unaudited Condensed Consolidat5

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (Deficit) - 6 months ended Jun. 30, 2016 - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Total	Common Stock [Member]	Additional paid-in capital [Member]	Accumulated other comprehensive income [Member]	Accumulated deficit [Member]	Noncontrolling interest [Member]
Balance at Dec. 31, 2015	$ 109,784	$ 20	$ 136,398	$ (4,247)	$ (30,787)	$ 8,400
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2015		19,926,868
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Retention bonus	790		790
Share based awards	1,236	$ 0	1,236
Share based awards (in shares)		30,039
Foreign currency translation adjustment	1,617			1,617
Net loss	(39,969)				(39,969)
Balance at Jun. 30, 2016	$ 73,458	$ 20	$ 138,424	$ (2,630)	$ (70,756)	$ 8,400
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2016		19,956,907

Unaudited Condensed Consolidat6

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - USD ($) $ in Thousands	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$ (39,969)	$ (6,603)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation and amortization	2,877	710
Share-based compensation expense	2,026	478
Non-cash rent expense	463	(61)
Deferred income taxes	(629)	(5,324)
Deferred warranty revenue	515	0
Reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions	(2,658)	11
Change in indemnification receivable	2,516	0
Amortization of inventory fair value mark up	1,402	2,717
Lower value of acquired inventory	(1,777)	0
Retrospective inventory opening balance sheet adjustment	(2,221)	0
Change in fair value of contingent consideration liabilities	(6,982)	809
Make whole provision for pre-IPO investors	0	1,827
Goodwill impairment	45,300	0
Change in assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable	(174)	(4,099)
Inventories	(2,259)	(701)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	(319)	(254)
Accounts payable	220	(1,055)
Accrued expenses	629	1,005
Other current liabilities	(977)	3,791
Net cash used in operating activities	(2,017)	(6,749)
Cash flows from investing activities
Capital expenditures	(535)	(70)
Purchases of companies, net of cash acquired	(149)	(85,761)
Net cash used in investing activities	(684)	(85,831)
Cash flows from financing activities
Net proceeds from initial public offering	0	101,289
Net proceeds from other issuances of common stock	0	250
Borrowings on revolving credit line	1,615	10,000
Payments on term loan	375	125
Debt issuance cost	52	438
Proceeds from other debt financing	0	213
Net cash provided by financing activities	1,188	111,189
Effect of foreign exchange fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents	(71)	(18)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(1,584)	18,591
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	2,827	453
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	1,243	19,044
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
Cash paid for interest	523	8
Noncash transactions:
Equity issued for purchases of Subsidiaries	0	33,733
Accrued future consideration for acquisitions	$ 0	$ 8,620

Description of Business

Description of Business	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Description of Business	Description of Business and Financial Condition Description of Business Fenix Parts, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “ Company ” or “ Fenix ”) are in the business of automotive recycling, which is the recovery and resale of original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) and aftermarket parts, components and systems, such as engines, transmissions, radiators, trunks, lamps and seats (referred to as “products”) reclaimed from damaged, totaled or low value vehicles. The Company purchases its vehicles primarily at auto salvage auctions. Upon receipt of vehicles, the Company inventories and then dismantles the vehicles and sells the recycled products. The Company ’s customers include collision repair shops (body shops), mechanical repair shops, auto dealerships and individual retail customers. The Company also generates a portion of its revenue from the sale as scrap of the unusable parts and materials, from the sale of used cars and motorcycles, and from the sale of extended warranty contracts. Liquidity and Financial Condition Since its inception in January 2014, Fenix’s primary sources of ongoing liquidity are cash flows from operations, cash provided by bank borrowings, proceeds from private stock sales, and the $101.3 million in net proceeds from its initial public offering (“IPO”) of common stock completed in May 2015. The Company has incurred operating losses since its inception and expects to continue to report operating losses for the foreseeable future as it integrates the subsidiaries it has acquired (see Note 3 below) and amortizes asset write-ups and intangibles assets established at acquisition. Fenix may never become profitable if it cannot successfully integrate and grow the acquired operations and reduce the level of outside professional fees that have been incurred during 2015 and 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2015 , the Company recorded a net loss of $26.0 million , and cash used in operating activities was $15.8 million . For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 , the Company recorded net income of $1.4 million and net loss of $ 40.0 million , respectively. The six month period includes an impairment of goodwill of $45.3 million (see Note 10 below), somewhat offset by the favorable impact on costs of goods sold attributable to an adjustment to the value assigned to acquired inventories (see Note 3 below) and reductions in the estimated fair value of contingent consideration liabilities (see Note 5 below). As of June 30, 2016 , Fenix had an accumulated deficit of $70.8 million . Effective December 31, 2015 , the Company entered into a $35 million amended and restated senior secured credit facility with BMO Harris Bank N.A. (the “ Amended Credit Facility ” or “ Credit Facility ”) (see Note 4 below for further details) which replaced the original Credit Facility with BMO Harris Bank N.A. (the “ Original Credit Facility ”). The Amended Credit Facility contained substantially the same terms as the Original Credit Facility except for adjustments to covenants which are discussed in Note 4 , below. Previous borrowings under the Original Credit Facility remained outstanding under the Amended Credit Facility, and the term remained as five years from the date of the Original Credit Facility, expiring on May 19, 2020. The Credit Facility was further amended on June 27, 2016 and August 19, 2016, with retroactive effect to March 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, respectively, pursuant to which certain financial covenant calculations, which are described in Note 4 , below, were further clarified and amended. As of June 30, 2016 , after classifying all the Credit Facility debt as a current liability as discussed further below, the Company had working capital of $3.5 million , including cash and cash equivalents of $1.2 million . As of June 30, 2016, the Company owed $22.1 million under the Amended Credit Facility (consisting of a term loan with a balance of $9.3 million and a revolving credit facility with a balance of $12.8 million ), and had $6.4 million in outstanding standby letters of credit. The Credit Facility is secured by a first-priority perfected security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets as well as all of the assets and the stock of its domestic subsidiaries, which also guaranty the borrowings, and 66% of the stock of its direct Canadian Subsidiary, Fenix Canada (other than its exchangeable preferred shares). The Credit Facility contains financial covenants with which the Company must comply which are described further in Note 4. Compliance with the financial covenants is measured quarterly and determines the amount of additional available credit, if any, that will be available in the future. The Credit Facility also contains other customary events of default, including the failure to pay any principal, interest or other amount when due, violation of certain of the Company’s affirmative covenants or any negative covenants or a breach of representations and warranties and, in certain circumstances, a change in control. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, payment of indebtedness may be accelerated and the lending commitments may be terminated. As of June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2016, the Company was in breach of the Credit Facility’s Borrowing Base and Total Leverage Ratio requirements as defined in Note 4 , as well as the requirement for timely delivery of certain quarterly certificates and reports. As a result, all of the Credit Facility debt is reported in the accompanying balance sheet as a current liability at June 30, 2016 and there can be no further borrowings of any availability under the Credit Facility until such defaults are rectified or waived. Ability to Continue as a Going Concern The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As such, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of assets and their carrying amounts, or the amount and classification of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. As of June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2016, the Company was in breach of certain financial covenants contained in the Credit Facility. The failure to operate within the requirements of these financial covenants was due primarily to (i) lower asset values as a result of reductions during 2016 to the aggregate estimated fair value of inventory acquired as part of the purchase of Subsidiaries, which have reduced the Company’s borrowing base, (ii) limits on certain non-cash adjustments to calculate EBITDA for covenant compliance, including the $2.0 million correction of goodwill impairment discussed in Note 2 below, and (iii) EBITDA during the third quarter of 2016 that was lower than forecasted because of a decline of approximately 5% in quarterly net revenues (as compared to a Company record level of net revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2016) and higher operating expenses, including significant accounting, legal and other fees, primarily as a result of the transition to a new public accounting firm beginning in July 2016 and the SEC inquiry discussed in Note 11 , which have forced the Company to incur significant accounting and legal fees during the second half of 2016. Management has been and remains highly focused on maximizing cash flows from operations and, to the extent possible under the circumstances, minimizing the cost of outsourced professional fees. Although scrap metal prices, which declined by more than 20% on average from the second to the third quarter of 2016, have increased since September 30, 2016, and the Company’s expectation is that the current high level of professional fees should decline after the first quarter of 2017, the Company still may not be able to comply with all the financial covenants contained in its Credit Facility in future periods unless those requirements are waived or amended or unless the Company can obtain new subordinated debt or equity financing. The Board of Directors and management continue to evaluate alternative strategies and capital structures, but there are no guarantees these discussions or negotiations will be successful. If the Company is unable to ultimately reach agreement with its lender, obtain waivers, find acceptable alternative financing or obtain equity contributions, the Company’s Credit Facility lender could elect to declare some or all of the amounts outstanding under the facility to be immediately due and payable. If this happens, the Company does not currently have sufficient liquidity to pay the then current portion of the Credit Facility. In addition, the Company has significant obligations under contingent consideration agreements related to certain acquired companies as described in Note 5, and it will need access to additional credit to be able to satisfy these obligations. As a result of the above, substantial doubt exists regarding the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business within one year from the date of this filing.

Basis of Presentation and Signi

Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies	Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures typically included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of Fenix Parts, Inc. and the notes thereto as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 . The Company continues to follow the accounting policies set forth in those consolidated financial statements, including its inventory accounting policy, which is reiterated as follows: Inventories consist entirely of recycled OEM and aftermarket products, including car hulls and other materials that will be sold as scrap and, to a lesser extent, used cars and motorcycles for resale. Inventory costs for recycled OEM parts are established using a retail method of accounting. Parts are dismantled from purchased vehicles and a retail price is assigned to each dismantled part. The total retail price of the inventoried parts is reduced by the estimated balance of parts that will be subsequently sold for scrap or discounted to a reduced expected selling price. These scrap and discount estimates are significant and require application of complex assumptions and judgments that are subject to change from period to period. The cost assigned to the salvaged parts and scrap is determined using the average cost-to-sales percentage at each operating facility and applying that percentage to the facility’s inventory at expected selling prices. The average cost-to-sales percentage is derived from each facility’s historical sales and actual cost paid for salvage vehicles purchased at auction or procured from other sources. The Company also capitalizes direct labor and overhead costs incurred to dismantle salvaged parts and prepare the parts for sale. With respect to self-service inventories, costs are established by calculating the average sales price per vehicle, including its scrap value and part value, applied to the total vehicles on-hand. Inventory costs for aftermarket parts, used cars and motorcycles for resale are established based upon the price the Company pays for these items. All inventory is recorded at the lower of cost or market value. The market value of the Company's inventory is determined based on the nature of the inventory and anticipated demand. If actual demand differs from the Company's earlier estimates, reductions to inventory carrying value are made in the period such determination is made. Management believes that these interim consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, normal and recurring in nature, that are necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2016 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 . Interim results are not necessarily indicative of annual results. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The consolidated Company represents a single operating segment. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein reflect only Fenix’s operations and financial position before the IPO and concurrent acquisitions of eleven founding companies, which are referred to in these notes as the “ Founding Companies ,” on May 19, 2015. The operations of the Founding Companies and subsequently acquired companies are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations from their respective dates of acquisitions. The Company sometimes refers to the Founding Companies and subsequently acquired companies in these notes as the “ Subsidiaries .” Use of Estimates The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company uses estimates in accounting for, among other items, inventory valuation using the retail method of accounting and reserves for potentially excess and unsalable inventory, contingent consideration liabilities, uncertain tax positions and certain other assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates require the application of complex assumptions and judgments, often because they involve matters that are inherently uncertain and will likely change in subsequent periods. The impact of any change in estimates is included in earnings in the period in which the estimate is adjusted. Reclassifications Reclassifications of prior period amounts have been made to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications have no impact on net income, cash flows, total assets or shareholders’ equity as previously reported. Correction of Immaterial Errors The Company previously incorrectly presented the net value of its above and below market long-term leases in its balance sheet. The Company assessed the materiality of this misstatement on prior periods’ financial statements in accordance with the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 99, Materiality, codified in ASC No. 250, Presentation of Financial Statements, and concluded that the misstatement was not material to any prior annual or interim periods. In the current period, the Company has corrected this immaterial error such that above market leases are recorded in other non-current assets and below market leases are recorded in non-current liabilities as shown in the table below. (In thousands) December 31, 2015 Previous presentation Other non-current assets $ 1,218 Current presentation Other non-current assets $ 3,388 Other non-current liabilities $ 2,170 In the first quarter of 2016, the Company failed to eliminate a portion of sales and purchases between certain subsidiaries. In addition, subsequent to reporting first quarter results, the Company determined that its first quarter adjustment of $7.3 million to reduce the aggregate estimated fair value of inventory acquired as part of the purchase of its Subsidiaries should have been $10.7 million . This fair value adjustment also has an impact on the previously reported goodwill impairment and income tax expense. Finally, the Company determined that the $2.5 million income recorded in the first quarter of 2016 for the estimated change in fair value of contingent consideration should have been $1.5 million higher due to the decline in scrap metal prices and decreased volume at the Company’s Canadian locations which are subject to the contingent consideration agreement. The Company assessed the materiality of these misstatements on prior periods’ financial statements in accordance with SAB No. 99, Materiality , codified in ASC No. 250, Presentation of Financial Statements , and concluded that the misstatements, individually and in the aggregate, were not material to the preceding interim period. In the current period, the Company has corrected these immaterial errors such that net revenues and costs and expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2016, as adjusted below reflect the proper amount of (i) intercompany sales eliminations, (ii) costs related to the adjustment to the aggregate estimated fair value of acquired inventory and goodwill impairment, and (iii) changes in contingent consideration liabilities. See Note 3 for further discussion regarding the adjustment to the estimated fair value of inventory acquired and the impact on cost of goods sold. Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 (In thousands) As Previously Reported Additional Elimination Acquired Inventory Fair Value Adjustment Contingent Consideration Adjustment As Adjusted Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 Net revenues $ 32,795 $ (613 ) $ — $ 32,182 $ 34,234 $ 66,416 Cost of goods sold 18,329 (613 ) (634 ) 17,082 20,760 37,842 Change in fair value of contingent consideration liabilities (2,505 ) (1,500 ) (4,005 ) (2,977 ) (6,982 ) Goodwill impairment 43,300 2,000 45,300 — 45,300 Benefit for income taxes (3,320 ) 479 (2,841 ) (270 ) (3,111 ) Recent Accounting Pronouncements In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment , which simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount. The new rules will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2020. The Company does not expect the adoption of the new accounting rules to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-03, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) , this amendment states that registrants should consider additional qualitative disclosures if the impact of an issued but not yet adopted ASU is unknown or cannot be reasonably estimated and to include a description of the effect of the accounting policies that the registrant expects to apply, if determined. Transition guidance included in certain issued but not yet adopted ASUs was also updated to reflect this update. The Company does not expect the adoption of the new accounting rules to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The standard introduces a screen for determining when assets acquired are not a business and clarifies that a business must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that contribute to an output to be considered a business. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company does not expect this new guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (Topic 230) (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force) . ASU 2016-15 addresses eight specific cash flow issues and apply to all entities, including both business entities and not-for-profit entities that are required to present a statement of cash flows under ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company has not yet adopted this update and is currently evaluating the impact it may have on its financial condition and results of operations. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments . ASU 2016-13 introduces a new forward-looking approach, based on expected losses, to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments, including trade receivables, which will require entities to incorporate considerations of historical information, current information and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This ASU also expands disclosure requirements. ASU 2016-13 is effective for the Company beginning the first quarter of 2020 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of ASU 2016-13 on its consolidated financial statements and related financial disclosures. In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting . The updated ASU changes the accounting for certain aspects of share-based payment awards to employees and requires the recognition of the income tax effects of awards in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled, thus eliminating additional paid in capital pools. The guidance also allows for the employer to repurchase more of an employee’s shares for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting. In addition, the guidance allows for a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur rather than on an estimated basis. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 effective April 1, 2016 as there have been no forfeitures or exercises, this standard has not had an effect on these unaudited condensed financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) . The guidance in ASU 2016-02 supersedes the lease recognition requirements in ASC Topic 840, Leases (FAS 13). The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record an ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. Early adoption of the amendment in the update is permitted. While the Company is currently evaluating the effect this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and timing of adoption, we expect that upon adoption, the Company will recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities and those amounts could be material. In September 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805), Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments, which simplifies the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in business combinations. The amendments require that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The amendments also require that the acquirer record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The ASU also requires an entity to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted ASU 2015-16 effective January 1, 2016, resulting in the recognition of adjustments to goodwill as described in Note 3 . In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) . This update outlines a single, comprehensive model for accounting for revenue from contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date by one year to January 1, 2018, while providing the option to early adopt the standard on the original effective date of January 1, 2017. The Company plans to adopt this update on January 1, 2018. The guidance can be adopted either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the adoption alternatives, which include utilizing a bottom-up approach to analyze the standard’s impact on our contract portfolio, comparing historical accounting policies and practices to the new standard to identify potential differences from applying the requirements of the new standard to its contracts. The Company has not yet selected a transition method and is currently evaluating the impact it may have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Acquisitions

Acquisitions	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Business Combinations [Abstract]
Acquisitions	Acquisitions 2015 Acquired Companies On May 19, 2015, Fenix closed on combinations with the eleven Founding Companies and subsequently during 2015 acquired three companies, all of which are engaged in the business of automotive recycling. Of the total purchase consideration of $154.6 million , $110.9 million was paid in cash, $35.3 million represents stock consideration issued in the acquisitions and potentially issuable under contingent consideration agreements, and $8.4 million represents discounted cash payments to be made up to 15 years after the acquisitions. The total purchase consideration includes adjustments identified through May 2016, as part of working capital true-ups and other contractual adjustments to the purchase consideration, which resulted in a net increase in the goodwill previously reported of $0.1 million . The table below summarizes the approximate fair values of the aggregate assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the respective dates of acquisitions, and incorporates the provisional adjustments in measurement since they were previously reported at December 31, 2015 through June 30, 2016 . These estimates and assumptions as they relate to the three companies acquired after the IPO in 2015 are subject to additional changes during the purchase price measurement period and could change materially as the Company finalizes the valuations of these assets and liabilities. The measurement period is one year from the date of the acquisition. (In thousands) Opening Balance Sheet as Previously Reported Adjustments During the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Additional Adjustments for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Adjusted Opening Balance Sheet Cash and other current assets $ 8,666 $ — $ — $ 8,666 Inventories (i) 47,794 (7,260 ) (3,462 ) 37,072 Property and equipment (ii) 13,235 — — 13,235 Other non-current assets (iii) 5,271 — — 5,271 Intangible assets (iv) 37,396 1,620 90 39,106 Current liabilities (7,572 ) — — (7,572 ) Reserve for uncertain tax positions (5,760 ) — — (5,760 ) Deferred income taxes, net (v) (24,168 ) 2,386 1,372 (20,410 ) Non-current liabilities (422 ) — — (422 ) Total net identifiable assets acquired 74,440 (3,254 ) (2,000 ) 69,186 Goodwill 80,023 3,648 1,755 85,426 Total net assets acquired $ 154,463 $ 394 $ (245 ) $ 154,612 During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company reduced the aggregate estimated value of the acquired inventories by $7.3 million to reflect the most recent historical information available regarding excess and unsaleable parts acquired as well as sales discounts given to sell certain acquired parts. This inventory adjustment resulted in a $1.6 million increase in intangible assets (customer relationships), a $2.4 million reduction in deferred income taxes and a $3.3 million increase in goodwill. In accordance with ASU No. 2015-16 which is as discussed in Note 2 above, the adjustment also resulted in a reduced charge to cost of goods sold during the three months ended March 31, 2016 of approximately $3.4 million consisting of $2.1 million for the opening inventory mark up to fair value (see (i) below) and $1.3 million related to the lower value of acquired inventories sold between the respective acquisition dates and December 31, 2015 . The $2.1 million adjustment to the opening inventory markup had a related $0.8 million deferred tax liability. During the three months ended June 30, 2016, the Company reduced the aggregate estimated value of the acquired inventories by an additional $3.5 million to more accurately reflect excess and unsaleable parts acquired as well as sales discounts given to sell certain acquired parts. As the information necessary to make these determinations was available through March 2016, the additional reduction of $3.5 million in the estimated value of acquired inventories should have been recorded in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2016. See Note 2 for further information on the correction of this immaterial error. This additional inventory adjustment also resulted in a $0.1 million increase in intangible assets (customer relationships), a $1.4 million reduction in deferred income taxes and a $2.0 million increase in goodwill. In accordance with ASU No. 2015-16 which is discussed in Note 2 above, this additional adjustment to acquired inventories also resulted in an additional reduction to cost of goods sold applied to the three months ended March 31, 2016 of approximately $0.6 million consisting of $0.1 million for the opening inventory mark up to fair value (see (i) below) and $0.5 million related to the lower value of acquired inventories sold between the respective acquisition dates and December 31, 2015. The $2.2 million aggregate adjustment to the opening inventory markup had a related $1.0 million deferred tax liability. The $2.2 million and the $1.0 million were previously recorded through the prior period operations and were recorded through the operating results as adjusted for the three months ended March 31, 2016 within the cost of goods sold and the tax benefit line items, respectively. Included in the fair value allocation reflected in the table above are the various valuations described below which are primarily based on Level 3 inputs: (i) Inventory was marked up to 90% of its estimated selling price representing the inventory’s fair market valuation, with selling costs and related profit margin estimated at all Subsidiaries to be 10% . This fair value mark up adjustment to inventory, after a reduction of $2.2 million for the opening balance sheet adjustment described above, totaled approximately $7.8 million , of which $0.5 million and $1.4 million was amortized as an additional charge recorded in cost of goods sold during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. This fair value mark up adjustment was completely amortized through June 30, 2016 as the acquired inventory was expected to be sold within six to nine months . (ii) Assumptions for property and equipment valuation, which are based on cost and market approaches, are primarily data from industry databases and dealers on current costs of new equipment and information about the useful lives and age of the equipment. The remaining useful life of property and equipment was determined based on historical experience using such assets, and varies from 1 - 6 years depending on the acquired company and nature of the assets. All property and equipment is being depreciated using the straight-line method. (iii) The Company may recover amounts from the former owners of certain of the acquired companies if the Company is required to make certain income tax or other payments as defined in the relevant acquisition agreements after the acquisition. In the case of the Founding Companies , the Company ’s right to these tax related indemnifications is generally subject to a threshold of 1% of the purchase price, a cap of 40% of the purchase price paid for each individual acquisition and a survival period of three years from the date of their acquisition. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 , the Company reversed $0.4 million and $2.5 million , respectively, of indemnification receivables through a charge in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations, as the statute of limitations expired on the tax-related indemnity as discussed further in Note 9 below. (iv) The table below summarizes the aggregate gross intangible assets recorded: (In thousands) Trade names $ 6,122 Customer relationships 31,308 Covenants not to compete 1,676 Total $ 39,106 Amortization expense for intangible assets was $0.9 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 , respectively, and $1.8 million and $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 , respectively. (v) The Company recorded deferred income taxes relating to the difference between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities acquired in the acquisitions in nontaxable transactions. The Company also eliminated historical deferred income taxes of the companies acquired in taxable transactions. Pro Forma Results The following table shows the combined pro forma net revenues and net loss of the Company as if all acquisitions of its Subsidiaries had occurred on January 1, 2015: (In thousands) Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 2015 Net revenues $ 31,999 $ 63,387 Net loss $ (199 ) $ (3,039 ) Pro forma combined net revenues consisted of: (In thousands) Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 2015 Recycled OE parts and related products $ 27,349 $ 54,668 Other ancillary products (scrap) 4,650 8,719 Total $ 31,999 $ 63,387 Significant adjustments to the historical revenues of the Subsidiaries include the elimination of sales between acquired companies, for which there is a corresponding decrease in pro forma cost of goods sold, and the elimination of revenue from the sale of warranties that are not recognized by Fenix in the post-acquisition periods. The cost of goods sold impact of the subsequent sale of acquired inventories written-up from historic cost basis to fair value is reflected for pro forma reporting purposes in the same manner as reported in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and is not adjusted back to January 1, 2015, as it does not have a continuing impact on the Company . As a result, pro forma gross profit and net income in the periods immediately following the acquisitions are substantially lower than the pre-acquisition periods. Significant adjustments to expenses include eliminating the effects of shares transferred from founding investors to later investors, incremental amortization of acquired intangible assets, rent expense associated with leases with the former owners of the acquired companies, compensation related to certain bonuses paid to owners and employees and related income tax effects.

Bank Credit Facility

Bank Credit Facility	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]
Bank Credit Facility	Bank Credit Facility Amended and Restated Credit Facility Effective December 31, 2015 , the Company entered into a $35 million amended and restated senior secured credit facility with BMO Harris Bank N.A. (the “ Amended Credit Facility ” or “ Credit Facility ”) which replaced the original Credit Facility with BMO Harris Bank N.A. (the “ Original Credit Facility ”). The Amended Credit Facility contained substantially the same terms as the Original Credit Facility except for adjustments to covenants which are discussed below. Previous borrowings under the Original Credit Facility remained outstanding under the Amended Credit Facility. The Credit Facility was further amended on June 27, 2016 and August 19, 2016, with retroactive effect to March 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, respectively, pursuant to which certain financial covenant calculations, which are described below, were further clarified and amended. The Credit Facility consists of $25.0 million as a revolving credit facility, allocated $20.0 million in U.S. Dollar revolving loans, with a $7.5 million sublimit for letters of credit, and $5.0 million in Canadian Dollar revolving loans, with a $2.5 million sublimit for letters of credit. The Company borrowed the remaining $10.0 million as a term loan concurrently with its IPO in May 2015. Proceeds of the credit facility can be used for capital expenditures, working capital, permitted acquisitions, and general corporate purposes. The term of the revolving credit facility and the term loan facility is 5 years from the date of the Original Credit Facility with each expiring on May 19, 2020 . The Amended Credit Facility and both subsequent amendments were determined to be modifications under ASC 470-50 of the Original Credit Facility that was entered into at the time of the IPO. The Credit Facility is secured by a first-priority perfected security interest in substantially all of the Company ’s assets as well as all of the assets of its domestic subsidiaries, which also guaranty the borrowings. In addition, the Company pledged all of the stock in its U.S. Subsidiaries as security and 66% of the stock of its direct Canadian Subsidiary , Fenix Canada (other than its exchangeable preferred shares). The Company ’s U.S. Dollar borrowings under the Amended Credit Facility bear interest at fluctuating rates, at the Company ’s election in advance for any applicable interest period, by reference to the “base rate”, “Eurodollar rate” or “Canadian Prime Rate” plus the applicable margin within the relevant range of margins provided in the Credit Facility . The base rate is the highest of (i) the rate BMO Harris Bank N.A. announces as its “prime rate,” (ii) 0.50% above the rate on overnight federal funds transactions or (iii) the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) for an interest period of one month plus 1.00% . The applicable margin is determined quarterly based on the Company ’s Total Leverage Ratio, as described below. The borrowings were subject to interest rates ranging from 3.57% - 4.66% at June 30, 2016 . The Canadian Dollar borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at fluctuating rates, at the Company ’s election in advance for any applicable interest period, by reference to the “Canadian Prime Rate” plus the applicable margin within the relevant range of margins provided in the Amended Credit Facility . The Canadian Prime Rate is the higher of (i) the rate the Bank of Montreal announces as its “reference rate,” or (ii) the Canadian Dollar Offered Rate (CDOR) for an interest period equal to the term of any applicable borrowing plus 0.50% . The applicable margin is determined quarterly based on the Company ’s Total Leverage Ratio, as described below. The maximum and initial margin for interest rates after March 31, 2016 on Canadian borrowings under the Credit Facility is 2.75% on base rate loans. The Credit Facility contains customary events of default, including the failure to pay any principal, interest or other amount when due, violation of certain of the Company ’s affirmative covenants or any negative covenants or a breach of representations and warranties and, in certain circumstances, a change of control. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, payment of indebtedness may be accelerated and the lending commitments may be terminated. The Credit Facility also contains financial covenants with which the Company must comply on a quarterly or annual basis, which have been amended since entering into the Original Credit Facility, including a Total Funded Debt to EBITDA Ratio (or “Total Leverage Ratio”, as defined). Total Funded Debt as it relates to the Total Leverage Ratio is defined as all indebtedness (a) for borrowed money, (b) for the purchase price of goods or services, (c) secured by assets of the Company or its Subsidiaries , (d) for any capitalized leases of property, (e) for letters of credit or other extensions of credit, (f) for payments owed regarding equity interests in the Company or its Subsidiaries , (g) for interest rate, currency or commodities hedging arrangements, or (h) for any guarantees of any of the foregoing as of the end of the most recent fiscal quarter. Consistent with the Original Credit Facility , Permitted Acquisitions are subject to bank review and a maximum Total Leverage Ratio, after giving effect to such acquisition. The Company must also comply with a minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio. Fixed charge coverage is defined as the ratio of (a) EBITDA less unfinanced capital expenditures for the four trailing quarterly periods to (b) fixed charges (principal and interest payments, taxes paid and other restricted payments); except that for the first three quarters of 2016, for the purposes of determining this ratio, EBITDA will be calculated based on a multiple of the then current EBITDA, instead of using the EBITDA for the prior four quarters. A similar annualization adjustment will be made for unfinanced capital expenditures for the same period. EBITDA includes after tax earnings with add backs for interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation expenses, and other additional items as outlined in the Credit Facility . In addition, the Credit Facility covenants include a minimum net worth covenant, which was revised effective March 31, 2016 . Net worth is defined as the total shareholders’ equity, including capital stock, additional paid in capital, and retained earnings after deducting treasury stock. The Amended Credit Facility includes a mandatory prepayment clause requiring certain cash payments when EBITDA exceeds defined requirements for the most recently completed fiscal year. These prepayments will be applied first to outstanding term loans and then to the revolving credit. The Company also is subject to a limitation on its indebtedness based on quarterly calculations of a Borrowing Base. The Borrowing Base is determined based upon Eligible Receivables and Eligible Inventory and is calculated separately for the United States and Canadian borrowings. If the total amount of principal outstanding for revolving loans, letters of credit and other defined obligations is in excess of the Borrowing Base, then the Company is required to repay the difference or be in default of the Credit Facility. As of June 30, 2016, the Company owed $22.1 million under the Credit Facility as shown in the table below. The Company also had $6.4 million outstanding in standby letters of credit under the Credit Facility related to the contingent consideration agreement with the former owners of the Canadian Founding Companies and the Company’s property and casualty insurance program. As of June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2016, for reasons described in Note 1, the Company was in breach of the Credit Facility’s Borrowing Base and Total Leverage Ratio requirements, as well as the requirement for timely delivery of certain quarterly certificates and reports for the second and third quarter of 2016. Since the Company is in default as of the date that this Second Quarter report on Form 10-Q is being filed, all of the Credit Facility debt is reported in the accompanying balance sheet as a current liability and there can be no further borrowings of any availability under the Credit Facility until such defaults are rectified or waived. The Company’s Board of Directors and management continue to evaluate alternative strategies and capital structures, but there are no guarantees these discussions or negotiations will be successful. If the Company is unable to reach agreement with its lender, obtain waivers, find acceptable alternative financing or obtain equity contributions, its lender could elect to declare some or all of the amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility to be immediately due and payable. If this happens, the Company does not currently have sufficient liquidity to pay the then current portion of the Credit Facility. Maturities of Credit Facility The following is a summary of the components of the Company ’s Credit Facility debt and amounts outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 : (In thousands) June 30, 2016 December 31, 2015 Obligations: Term loan $ 9,250 $ 9,625 Revolving credit facility 12,815 11,200 Total debt 22,065 20,825 Less: long-term debt issuance costs (292 ) (299 ) Less: short-term debt issuance costs (100 ) (88 ) Total debt, net of issuance costs 21,673 20,438 Less: current maturities, net of debt issuance costs (21,673 ) (793 ) Long-term debt, net of issuance costs $ — $ 19,645 There have been no additional borrowings under the Credit Facility since June 30, 2016. Scheduled maturities, which the Company continues to follow, are as follows for the periods ending June 30; however, as described above, the Company is in default under the Credit Facility and the lender could elect to declare some or all of the amounts shown below as immediately due and payable and therefore all the debt is classified as a current liability in the accompanying balance sheet. (In thousands) 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revolving credit facility $ — $ — $ — $ 12,815 $ 12,815 Term loan 1,000 1,000 1,000 6,250 9,250 Debt issuance costs (113 ) (113 ) (113 ) (53 ) (392 ) Total $ 887 $ 887 $ 887 $ 19,012 $ 21,673 Debt Issuance Costs As noted above, the Company entered into the Amended Credit Facility effective December 31, 2015 and a first amendment effective as of March 31, 2016 , that was deemed under ASC 470 to be a modification of the Original Credit Facility . As such, debt issuance costs will continue to be amortized over the remaining term of the Amended Credit Facility . As the termination date of the Amended Credit Facility is the same as the Original Credit Facility , this did not change the continuing impact of previous debt issuance costs. In connection with the original agreement, the Company incurred $438,000 in original debt issuance costs during 2015 and an additional $52,000 in amendment charges during the three months ended June 30, 2016, which are netted against the term loan balance and are being amortized over the term of the Original Credit Facility . The amortized debt issuance costs are recognized as interest expense in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and amounted to $25,000 and $47,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 , respectively.

Contingent Consideration Liabil

Contingent Consideration Liabilities	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Contingent Consideration Liabilities	Contingent Consideration Liabilities As part of the consideration for three of the Founding Companies , the Company entered into contingent consideration agreements with certain of the selling shareholders, as described in the paragraphs below. Under the terms of the contingent consideration agreements, additional consideration will be payable to the former owners if specified future events occur or conditions are met, such as meeting profitability or earnings targets. The fair value of the aggregate contingent consideration was initially estimated as $10.2 million and recorded in the consolidated financial statements at the acquisition date based on independent valuations considering the Company ’s initial projections for the relevant Founding Companies , the respective target levels, the relative weighting of various future scenarios and a discount rate of approximately 5.0% . Management periodically reviews the amount of contingent consideration that is likely to be payable under current operating conditions and has since adjusted the initial liability as deemed necessary, with such subsequent adjustments being recorded through the consolidated statement of operations as an operating charge or credit. In the event that there is a range of possible outcomes, the Company applies a probability approach to determine the estimated obligation to be recorded at the end of an accounting period. For the combination with Jerry Brown, Ltd. (“ Jerry Brown ”), the Company is required to pay (a) up to an additional $1.8 million if the business achieved certain revenue targets during the twelve-month period beginning June 2015, and (b) an additional uncapped amount if the business exceeds certain EBITDA levels during 2016. Based on an evaluation of the likelihood of meeting these performance targets, the Company recorded a liability for the acquisition date fair value of the contingent consideration of $2.5 million and increased this liability by $5.1 million during 2015 based on substantial operating improvements and management’s budget for Jerry Brown for 2016. Based on results actually achieved during the first half of 2016, EBITDA is now estimated to be less than the previously developed budget and, accordingly, the estimated fair value of the contingent liability was reduced by $2.3 million , resulting in a credit to income which is reflected in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2016 , of which $0.9 million was recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2016 . As of June 30, 2016 , the total contingent consideration liability attributable to the Jerry Brown acquisition was (a) $1.8 million for achieving the revenue target, which management and the former owners of Jerry Brown agree was fully earned, and (b) $3.5 million estimated for the EBITDA target which will be determined in 2017. The Company expects to fund these payments to the former owners of Jerry Brown , to the extent they are ultimately deemed earned, through cash generated from operations or, if necessary and available, through draws on the revolving Credit Facility or through other sources of capital that may be available. The combination agreements for Eiss Brothers, Inc. (“ Eiss Brothers ”) and End of Life Vehicles Inc. , Goldy Metals Incorporated , and Goldy Metals (Ottawa) Incorporated (collectively, “the Canadian Founding Companies ”) provide for a holdback of additional consideration which will be payable, in part or in whole, only if certain performance targets are achieved. The maximum amount of additional consideration that can be earned by the former owners of Eiss Brothers is $0.2 million in cash plus 11,667 shares of Fenix common stock, of which none, some or all will be released from escrow depending upon the EBITDA of Eiss Brothers during the twelve-month period beginning June 2015. The maximum amount of additional consideration that can be earned and is subject to holdback for the Canadian Founding Companies is $5.9 million in cash, secured by a letter of credit under our Credit Facility, plus 280,000 Exchangeable Preferred Shares currently held in escrow, of which, none, some or all will be released to the Canadian Founding Companies depending on their combined revenues from specific types of sales for the twelve-month period beginning June 2015. Based on management’s evaluation of the likelihood of meeting these performance targets for these two acquisitions, a liability of $7.8 million was recorded at the acquisition date for the fair value of the aggregate contingent consideration, which included the present value of the estimated cash portion and the then-current value of the Fenix common stock and the Exchangeable Preferred Shares held in escrow. While management’s estimate of the operating results for Eiss Brothers has not changed since its acquisition, the contingent consideration liability for the Canadian Founding Companies was reduced during the six months ended June 30, 2016 in accordance with FASB ASC No. 805 “Business Combinations,” which requires the Company to estimate contingent consideration at fair value using possible outcomes. As the amount of the contingent consideration is currently in dispute, the Company has recorded the estimated contingent consideration liability for the Canadian Founding Companies as of June 30, 2016 based on the result of its assessment of the possible outcomes. These contingent consideration liabilities are also subject to mark-to-market fluctuations based on changes in the trading price of Fenix common stock and, with respect to the Canadian Founding Companies , currency remeasurement. As a result of all these factors, the estimated fair value of the aggregate contingent liability due to the former owners of Eiss Brothers and the Canadian Founding Companies was reduced by $2.1 million and $4.2 million , and an exchange rate gain of $0.0 million and $0.5 million was recognized in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 , respectively. The Company expects to fund any cash payments to the former owners of the Canadian Founding Companies , to the extent they are ultimately deemed earned, through draws on the bank letter of credit, which is considered Funded Debt under the Total Leverage Ratio required under the Credit Facility. The period for calculating all contingent consideration liabilities was complete as of June 30, 2016, except for Jerry Brown’s uncapped EBITDA contingency. The Company is currently in negotiations with the former owners of the Canadian Founding Companies regarding the calculation of contingent consideration earned, if any, and the parties have agreed to extend the period for finalizing the calculation past the date of this filing to provide additional time for the parties to agree on the final consideration. If the parties are unable to ultimately agree, the matter will be subject to arbitration.

Common Stock and Preferred Shar

Common Stock and Preferred Shares	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Equity [Abstract]
Common Stock and Preferred Shares	Common Stock and Preferred Shares Fenix was formed and initially capitalized in January 2014 by a group of investors, including the Chief Executive and the Chief Financial Officers, who paid nominal cash consideration for an aggregate of 1.8 million shares of Fenix common stock. In March and April 2014, Fenix issued and sold an aggregate of 402,000 shares of common stock for a purchase price of $5.00 per share. During the period of September 2014 through May 2015, Fenix issued and sold an aggregate of 546,927 shares of common stock for an ultimate purchase price of $6.50 per share. Of these shares, 20,000 were issued to certain investors for no cash consideration in order to effectively convert their $7.50 per share investments to $6.50 per share investments. Such issuances resulted in a charge to other income (expense), net in January 2015 of $131,000 . The Company completed its IPO on May 19, 2015. The Company raised approximately $110.4 million in gross proceeds from the IPO by selling 13.8 million shares at $8.00 per share and netted $101.3 million in the IPO after paying the underwriter’s discount and other offering costs. The agreements that relate to the common stock sales in March, April and September 2014 included provisions that obligated the holders of the common stock issued in January 2014 to compensate the investors in the later sales if the IPO price of Fenix common stock was less than $10.00 per share. As the IPO price was $8.00 per share, the initial investors transferred 237,231 of their shares to the later investors equal in value to the aggregate difference in value between the IPO price of $8.00 per share and $10.00 per share, resulting in a charge of $1.7 million to other expense as of the IPO date. The later investors were also granted registration rights. Effective May 19, 2015, the Company issued 1,050,000 exchangeable preferred shares of Fenix’s subsidiary , Fenix Parts Canada, Inc. (“Exchangeable Preferred Shares”) as acquisition consideration valued at the public offering price of common stock of $8.00 per share. Because these shares do not entitle the holders to any Fenix Canada dividends or distributions, no earnings or losses of Fenix Canada are attributable to those holders. These shares are exchangeable on a 1-for-1 basis for shares of the Company ’s common stock. The single share of special voting stock is entitled to vote on any matter submitted to a vote of holders of the Company ’s common stock a number of votes equal to the number of Exchangeable Preferred Shares of Fenix Parts Canada, Inc. issued to the former shareholders of the Canadian Founding Companies . The share of special voting stock is intended to provide the former shareholders of the Canadian Founding Companies the equivalent voting rights in Fenix common stock they would have received if the combination agreement for the Canadian Founding Companies had required Fenix to issue shares of Fenix common stock instead of Exchangeable Preferred Shares. The share of special voting stock is held in a voting trust for the benefit of the former shareholders of the Canadian Founding Companies , and the trustee of the voting trust will vote the share of special voting stock in accordance with the beneficiaries’ directions. Neither the holder of the share of special voting stock nor the beneficiaries of the share of special voting stock is entitled to receive any dividends or other distributions that Fenix may make in respect of shares of the Company ’s common stock.

Share-Based Compensation

Share-Based Compensation	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]
Share-Based Compensation	Share-Based Compensation Fenix’s 2014 Incentive Stock Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by the Board of Directors in November 2014 and went into effect January 6, 2015 after it was approved by the Company ’s shareholders. The Plan was amended by the Board of Directors and restated effective July 8, 2015 and again in November 2015, effective December 1, 2015. The Plan permits grants of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards (in the form of equity bonuses), and other awards (which may be based in whole or in part on the value of the Company ’s common stock). Directors, salaried employees, and consultants of the Company and its commonly-controlled affiliates are eligible to participate in the Plan, which is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company ’s Board of Directors. The number of shares originally reserved for share-based awards under the Plan equaled 2,750,000 shares. No awards were granted prior to the IPO. As of June 30, 2016 , the Company had 754,000 shares available for share-based awards under the Plan. The Plan requires that each restricted stock unit and restricted stock award issued reduce shares available by two shares. Share-based compensation is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The components of share-based compensation were as follows: (In thousands) Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Stock options $ 354 $ 62 $ 934 $ 62 Restricted stock grants 165 — 252 — Leesville bonus shares 249 285 790 285 Other restricted or unregistered share issuances — 131 50 131 Total share-based compensation $ 768 $ 478 $ 2,026 $ 478 Stock Options Stock options granted to employees under the Plan typically have a 10 -year life and vest in equal installments on each of the first four anniversary dates of the grant, although certain awards have been made with a shorter vesting period. The Company calculates stock compensation expense for employee option awards based on the grant date fair value of the award, less actual annual forfeitures, and recognizes expense on a straight-line basis over the service period of the award. Stock options granted to non-executive directors vest on the first anniversary of the award date. Stock compensation expense for these awards to non-executive directors is based on the grant date fair value of the award and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the one -year service period of the award. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the grant date fair value of employee and director stock options. The principal variable assumptions utilized in valuing options and the methodology for estimating such model inputs include: (1) risk-free interest rate – an estimate based on the yield of zero–coupon treasury securities with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option; (2) expected volatility – an estimate based on the historical volatility of similar companies’ common stock for a period equal to the expected life of the option; (3) expected life of the option – an estimate based on industry historical experience including the effect of employee terminations; and (4) expected dividend yield - an estimate of cash dividends. The Company does not currently intend to pay cash dividends and thus has assumed a 0% dividend yield. For the 2015 and 2016 equity award grants, there were no forfeitures applied due to the lack of historical forfeiture experience to date. Based on the results of the model, the fair value of the stock options granted during the first six months of 2016 ranged from $1.20 to $1.54 per share using the following assumptions: Expected dividend yield — % Risk-free interest rate 1.3 - 1.85% Expected volatility 30.0 % Expected life of option 6.3 years Stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was as follows: Number of Options Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years Aggregate Intrinsic Value Outstanding on December 31, 2015 1,596,297 $ 9.02 Granted 35,000 4.21 Exercised — — Expired or forfeited — — Outstanding on June 30, 2016 1,631,297 $ 8.92 9.02 $ 8,000 Exercisable on June 30, 2016 429,316 $ 8.88 8.93 $ — At June 30, 2016 , there was $2.6 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to stock option awards to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.0 years . Restricted Stock Units Restricted stock units (RSUs) granted to employees and directors vest over time based on continued service (typically, for employees, vesting over a four or five year period in equal annual installments). Such time-vested RSUs are valued at fair value based on the closing price of Fenix common stock on the date of grant. Compensation cost is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. A summary of restricted stock units activity for the six months ended June 30, 2016 is as follows: Number of Awards Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share Unvested restricted stock units at December 31, 2015 150,000 $ 9.68 Granted 29,332 4.23 Forfeited — — Vested 19,332 4.00 Unvested restricted stock units at June 30, 2016 160,000 $ 9.37 At June 30, 2016 , there was $1.2 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock units to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.5 years . The Company’s Director Compensation Policy provides that non-employee directors may elect to receive shares of fully-vested restricted stock in lieu of cash compensation based on the average closing price of the Company’s common stock during the period of service. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company issued 19,332 fully-vested restricted shares to the directors making such election for the period of service from January 1, 2016 to May 24, 2016 (date of the Annual Meeting) and recorded compensation expense of approximately $0.1 million . Leesville Bonus Shares The Company issued 271,112 restricted shares of common stock as part of the closing of the Leesville acquisition for post-combination services of certain Leesville employees. The shares fully vested on May 13, 2016, twelve months after the grant date. Employee Stock Purchase Plan At the Company’s Annual Meeting on May 24, 2016, the Company’s shareholders approved the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESP Plan”) effective June 1, 2016. The number of shares authorized for purchase under the ESP Plan is 750,000 . The first offering period commenced on July 1, 2016.

Income_(Loss) per Share

Income/(Loss) per Share	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]
Income/(Loss) Per Share	Income (Loss) Per Share Basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shares by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period using the two-class method. The Fenix Canada preferred shares do not entitle the holders to any dividends or distributions and therefore, no earnings or losses of Fenix Canada are attributable to those holders. However, these shares are considered participating securities and therefore share in the Company’s net income (loss) of the period since being issued on May 19, 2015. Diluted income (loss) per share includes the impact of outstanding common share equivalents as if those equivalents were exercised or converted into common shares if such assumed exercise or conversion is dilutive. The calculations of income (loss) per share are as follows: (In thousands except share data) Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Basic Income (Loss) per Common Share: Net income (loss) $ 1,393 $ (3,974 ) $ (39,969 ) $ (6,603 ) Net income (loss) allocable to Fenix Canada preferred shares 70 (175 ) (2,019 ) (239 ) Net income (loss) available to common shares $ 1,323 $ (3,799 ) $ (37,950 ) $ (6,364 ) Weighted-average common shares outstanding 19,799,664 11,388,524 19,732,005 7,003,537 Basic income (loss) per common share $ 0.07 $ (0.33 ) $ (1.92 ) $ (0.91 ) Diluted Income (Loss) per Common Share: Net income (loss) $ 1,393 $ (3,974 ) $ (39,969 ) $ (6,603 ) Net income (loss) allocable to Fenix Canada preferred shares 78 (175 ) (2,019 ) (239 ) Net income (loss) available to common shares $ 1,315 $ (3,799 ) $ (37,950 ) $ (6,364 ) Dilution from stock options and unvested RSUs 171,773 0 0 0 Weighted-average common shares outstanding 19,971,437 11,388,524 19,732,005 7,003,537 Diluted income (loss) per common share $ 0.07 $ (0.33 ) $ (1.92 ) $ (0.91 ) The Company has 11,667 common shares and 280,000 shares of Fenix Canada exchangeable preferred stock held in escrow relating to contingent consideration agreements relating to certain acquired companies. These shares are not included in basic income loss per share or in the shares used to calculate the net income (loss) attributable to Fenix Canada preferred shares and will not be included until the contingencies relating to their issuance have been determined, and some, all or none of these shares have been issued. Outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock units described in Note 7 above are not included in the computation of diluted loss per share for any periods during which the inclusion of such equity equivalents would be anti-dilutive. The Leesville bonus shares described in Note 7 above are included in the weighted-average common shares outstanding for all periods presented.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Income Taxes	Income Taxes For interim periods, the Company estimates its effective tax rate for the full year and records an interim provision or benefit, as applicable, at such rate. The Company ’s effective tax rate (benefit) of 7.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 , differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 34% due primarily to the goodwill impairment, for which no tax benefit was recorded as described further in Note 10 . Other items impacting the effective tax rate include the reversal of $2.7 million in reserves for uncertain tax positions as described below, state income taxes, differences between U.S. and Canadian income tax rates, changes in the indemnification receivable and the contingent consideration liability which are not tax deductible, and the effect of a valuation allowance recorded for Canadian deferred tax assets. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was 44.5% . The calculation of tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. The Company ’s uncertain tax position reserves at June 30, 2016 , including related accrued interest and penalties of approximately $1.4 million , all relate to tax positions assumed as part of the acquisitions in 2015. These tax reserves are reviewed periodically and adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as progress of tax audits, lapse of applicable statutes of limitations, and changes in tax law. Under certain conditions, payments made by the Company , including interest and penalties, for assumed uncertain tax positions are indemnified by the previous owners of the Subsidiaries for a period of three years from the acquisition in the case of the Founding Companies and for the period of the applicable statute of limitations in the case of the later-acquired companies. As of December 31, 2015 , the Company had approximately $5.7 million of uncertain tax position reserves. During the six months ended June 30, 2016 , the statute of limitations lapsed without audit for certain tax returns filed by acquired companies for which reserves for uncertain tax positions and indemnification receivables had been established. As a result, the Company reversed $2.7 million of uncertain tax position reserves, which included $1.0 million of accrued interest and penalties, as a credit to the income tax benefit in the condensed consolidated statement of operations. As of June 30, 2016 , the remaining uncertain tax position reserves amounted to approximately $3.1 million . Correspondingly, the indemnification receivables were reduced by $2.5 million through a charge to operating expenses, and there is a remaining indemnification receivable of $2.6 million recorded in the balance sheet as of June 30, 2016 . If a reserved uncertain tax position results in an actual liability and the Company is unable to collect on or enforce the related indemnification provision or if the actual liability occurs after the applicable indemnity period has expired, there could be a material charge to the Company ’s consolidated financial results and reduction of cash resources.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and Intangible Assets	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]
Goodwill and Intangible Assets	Goodwill and Intangible Assets Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired business over the net of the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows: (In thousands) Balance as of December 31, 2015 $ 76,812 Purchase accounting allocation adjustments, as corrected (see Note 3) 5,648 Exchange rate effects 659 Balance before impairment 83,119 Impairment charge, as corrected (Note 2) (45,300 ) Balance as of March 31, 2016 $ 37,819 Exchange rate effects 1 Purchase accounting allocation adjustments (see Note 3) (245 ) Balance as of June 30, 2016 $ 37,575 Pursuant to the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other,” goodwill is required to be tested at the reporting unit level for impairment annually or whenever indications of impairment arise. Management has determined the Company operates as one operating segment and one reporting unit, Automotive Recycling, and all the goodwill is considered attributable to that reporting unit for impairment testing. The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test for 2015 as of October 1, 2015, also updated as of December 31, 2015, and management determined that no impairment of goodwill existed at either date. During the first quarter of 2016, the Company ’s stock price declined 32% from $6.79 /share at December 31, 2015 to $4.60 /share at March 31, 2016, and management performed step 1 of the two-step impairment test and determined that potential impairment of the reporting unit existed at March 31, 2016, since book value at such date no longer exceeded the carrying amount. As such, management applied the second step of the goodwill impairment test and, with consideration of a third party valuation report, calculated an estimated fair value as a hypothetical purchase price for the reporting unit to determine the resulting “implied” goodwill (computed by estimating the fair value of the reporting unit and comparing that estimated fair value to the reporting unit’s carrying value). An excess of a reporting unit’s recorded goodwill over its “implied” goodwill is reported as an impairment charge. The Company ’s reporting unit fair value estimates are established using weightings of the Company ’s market capitalization and a discounted future cash flow methodology. Management believes that using the two methods to estimate fair value limits the chances of an unrepresentative valuation. Nonetheless, these valuations are subject to significant subjectivity and assumptions as discussed further below. The Company considers its current market capitalization compared to the sum of the estimated fair values of its business in conjunction with each impairment assessment. As part of this consideration, management recognizes that the Company ’s market capitalization at March 31, 2016, or at any specific date, may not be an accurate representation of fair value for the following reasons: • The long-term horizon of the valuation process versus a short-term valuation using current market conditions; and • Control premiums reflected in the reporting unit fair values but not in the Company ’s stock price. In addition to market capitalization analysis the Company re-performed a discounted future cash flow analysis for the purpose of determining the amount of goodwill impairment. Such analysis relies on key assumptions, including, but not limited to, the estimated future cash flows of the reporting unit, weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”), and terminal growth rates of the Company. The determination of fair value is highly sensitive to differences between estimated and actual cash flows and changes in the WACC and related discount rate used to evaluate the fair value of the reporting unit. In evaluating the key variables this time, management (i) reduced the estimated future cash flows based upon actual results achieved during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and revised projections, and (ii) concluded that the Company ’s WACC and terminal growth rates were 13% and 3% , respectively, as compared to 10% and 3% used in the test at October 1, 2015. Based on the result of this second step of the goodwill impairment analysis as of March 31, 2016, combining the market capitalization and discounted cash flow methodologies, the Company recorded a $45.3 million non-cash charge to reduce the carrying value of goodwill. The Canadian Founding Companies were acquired in 2015 in an asset purchase, and the tax benefit associated with the portion of this charge related to the Canadian Founding Companies was offset by a valuation allowance because of the uncertainties associated with generating future taxable income in Canada. While management believes that the estimates and assumptions underlying the valuation methodology are reasonable, different estimates and assumptions could result in substantially different outcomes. The table below presents the decrease in the fair value of the reporting unit given a one percent increase in the discount rate or a one percent decrease in the long-term assumed annual revenue growth rate. A 10% change in the weighting of the discounted cash flow approach and the market approach would not have had a significant effect on the fair value of the reporting unit. Decrease in Fair Value of Reporting Unit (in thousands) Discount Rate - Increase by 1% $ 11,000 Long-term Growth Rate - Decrease by 1% $ 6,000 A goodwill impairment analysis requires significant judgments, estimates and assumptions, and the results of the impairment analysis described above are as of a point in time - March 31, 2016. Future events that could result in further interim assessments of goodwill and a potential further impairment include, but are not limited to, (i) a further decline in the Company ’s stock price below the valuation used to compute the impairment at March 31, 2016, (ii) significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results and/or reductions in estimated future sales growth rates, (iii) further reduction in scrap prices, (iv) further reduction in the Canadian exchange rate, (v) an increase in the Company ’s weighted average cost of capital, (vi) significant increases in vehicle procurement costs, (vii) significant changes in the manner of or use of the assets or the strategy for the Company ’s overall business, (viii) variation in vehicle accident rates or other significant negative industry trends, (ix) changes in state or federal laws, (x) a significant economic downturn, or (xi) changes in other variables that can materially impact the Company ’s business. Intangible assets represent purchased assets that lack physical substance but can be distinguished from goodwill. The Company ’s intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization, totaled $35.2 million at March 31, 2016 and $34.3 million at June 30, 2016 , and consist of trade names, non-competition agreements and customer relationships. The Company , in conjunction with its third party valuation expert, used various techniques in estimating the initial fair value of acquired intangible assets. These valuations are primarily based on the present value of the estimated net cash flows expected to be derived from the intangible assets, discounted for assumptions such as future customer attrition. Management evaluates the intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Therefore, changes such as higher or earlier-than-expected customer attrition may result in higher future amortization charges or an impairment charge for intangible assets. As part of the goodwill impairment analysis discussed above, the Company also reviewed intangible assets and did not identify any impairment as of March 31, 2016. There were no indicators at June 30, 2016 that caused the Company to revisit the possibility of further impairment for goodwill and for intangible assets. Expected second quarter results and market capitalization were considered as part of the March 31, 2016 analysis, and actual results and other key factors did not deviate from management’s expectations in such a way that would call into question the realizability of goodwill and other long lived assets as of June 30, 2016 .

Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies Operating Leases Rental expense for operating leases was approximately $0.8 million and $1.6 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 , respectively. The Company leases properties from the former owners of the Founding Companies and other related parties. The Company did not enter into any new leases during the six months ended June 30, 2016 . Legal, Environmental and Related Contingencies From time to time, the Company is subject to litigation related to normal business operations. The Company maintains insurance for normal business risks and seeks to vigorously defend itself in litigation. The Company also is subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business. Management currently expects that the resolution of any potential contingencies arising from compliance with these laws and regulations will not materially affect the Company ’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. SEC Inquiry In September 2016, the Company received a subpoena from the Chicago Regional Office of the SEC requiring the production of various documents, which were all provided during December 2016 and January 2017. The SEC inquiry appears to be focused on the Company’s change during 2016 in its independent registered public accounting firm, its previously announced business combinations and related goodwill impairment charge, the effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting and its inventory valuation methodology. The Company’s receipt of a subpoena from the SEC does not mean that it has violated securities laws. Although the Company has incurred substantial legal fees and other costs associated with production of the documents required by the SEC and may incur further costs before this inquiry is concluded, management does not believe that the inquiry will ultimately have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flow, but cannot predict the duration or outcome of the inquiry. Class Action Lawsuit In January 2017, a class action lawsuit entitled Beezley v. Fenix Parts, Inc. et al, was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against the Company, Kent Robertson, its President and Chief Executive Officer, and Scott Pettit, its Chief Financial Officer (the “Defendants”). The lawsuit was filed on behalf of purchasers of the Company’s shares from May 14, 2015 through October 12, 2016. The complaint asserts that all defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and SEC Rule 10b-5 and that Messrs. Robertson and Pettit violated Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The complaint asserts that the defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company had an inadequate inventory valuation methodology; (2) the Company had an inadequate methodology to calculate goodwill impairment; (3) the Company was engaging and/or had engaged in conduct that would result in an SEC investigation; and (4) as a result, the defendants’ statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. The plaintiffs seek class certification, an award of unspecified damages, an award of reasonable costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees and expert fees, and other further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. The Company believes that the allegations contained in the complaint are without merit and, in conjunction with its insurance carrier, intends to vigorously defend itself against all claims asserted therein. A reasonable estimate of the amount of any possible loss or range of loss, after applicable insurance coverage, cannot be made at this time and, as such, the Company has not recorded an accrual for any possible loss.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]
Fair Value Measurements	Fair Value Measurements Fair Value Measurements of financial assets and liabilities are defined as the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the principal market at the measurement date (exit price). The Company is required to classify fair value measurements in one of the following categories: Level 1 - inputs which are defined as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 - inputs which are defined as inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 - inputs which are defined as unobservable inputs for the assets or liabilities. Financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. June 30, 2016 , the fair value of contingent consideration, which is a recurring fair value measurement, was valued in the consolidated financial statements using Level 3 inputs. The Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses are carried at cost, which are Level 1 as they approximate fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. Note 5 above for further details related to contingent consideration fair value estimates and related adjustments recorded in the consolidated financial statements).

Basis of Presentation and Sig19

Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Basis of Presentation	Basis of Presentation These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures typically included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of Fenix Parts, Inc. and the notes thereto as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 . The Company continues to follow the accounting policies set forth in those consolidated financial statements, including its inventory accounting policy, which is reiterated as follows: Inventories consist entirely of recycled OEM and aftermarket products, including car hulls and other materials that will be sold as scrap and, to a lesser extent, used cars and motorcycles for resale. Inventory costs for recycled OEM parts are established using a retail method of accounting. Parts are dismantled from purchased vehicles and a retail price is assigned to each dismantled part. The total retail price of the inventoried parts is reduced by the estimated balance of parts that will be subsequently sold for scrap or discounted to a reduced expected selling price. These scrap and discount estimates are significant and require application of complex assumptions and judgments that are subject to change from period to period. The cost assigned to the salvaged parts and scrap is determined using the average cost-to-sales percentage at each operating facility and applying that percentage to the facility’s inventory at expected selling prices. The average cost-to-sales percentage is derived from each facility’s historical sales and actual cost paid for salvage vehicles purchased at auction or procured from other sources. The Company also capitalizes direct labor and overhead costs incurred to dismantle salvaged parts and prepare the parts for sale. With respect to self-service inventories, costs are established by calculating the average sales price per vehicle, including its scrap value and part value, applied to the total vehicles on-hand. Inventory costs for aftermarket parts, used cars and motorcycles for resale are established based upon the price the Company pays for these items. All inventory is recorded at the lower of cost or market value. The market value of the Company's inventory is determined based on the nature of the inventory and anticipated demand. If actual demand differs from the Company's earlier estimates, reductions to inventory carrying value are made in the period such determination is made. Management believes that these interim consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, normal and recurring in nature, that are necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2016 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 . Interim results are not necessarily indicative of annual results. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The consolidated Company represents a single operating segment. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein reflect only Fenix’s operations and financial position before the IPO and concurrent acquisitions of eleven founding companies, which are referred to in these notes as the “ Founding Companies ,” on May 19, 2015. The operations of the Founding Companies and subsequently acquired companies are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations from their respective dates of acquisitions. The Company sometimes refers to the Founding Companies and subsequently acquired companies in these notes as the “ Subsidiaries .”
Reclassifications	Reclassifications Reclassifications of prior period amounts have been made to conform to the current period presentation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements	Recent Accounting Pronouncements In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment , which simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount. The new rules will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2020. The Company does not expect the adoption of the new accounting rules to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-03, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) , this amendment states that registrants should consider additional qualitative disclosures if the impact of an issued but not yet adopted ASU is unknown or cannot be reasonably estimated and to include a description of the effect of the accounting policies that the registrant expects to apply, if determined. Transition guidance included in certain issued but not yet adopted ASUs was also updated to reflect this update. The Company does not expect the adoption of the new accounting rules to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The standard introduces a screen for determining when assets acquired are not a business and clarifies that a business must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that contribute to an output to be considered a business. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company does not expect this new guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (Topic 230) (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force) . ASU 2016-15 addresses eight specific cash flow issues and apply to all entities, including both business entities and not-for-profit entities that are required to present a statement of cash flows under ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company has not yet adopted this update and is currently evaluating the impact it may have on its financial condition and results of operations. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments . ASU 2016-13 introduces a new forward-looking approach, based on expected losses, to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments, including trade receivables, which will require entities to incorporate considerations of historical information, current information and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This ASU also expands disclosure requirements. ASU 2016-13 is effective for the Company beginning the first quarter of 2020 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of ASU 2016-13 on its consolidated financial statements and related financial disclosures. In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting . The updated ASU changes the accounting for certain aspects of share-based payment awards to employees and requires the recognition of the income tax effects of awards in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled, thus eliminating additional paid in capital pools. The guidance also allows for the employer to repurchase more of an employee’s shares for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting. In addition, the guidance allows for a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur rather than on an estimated basis. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 effective April 1, 2016 as there have been no forfeitures or exercises, this standard has not had an effect on these unaudited condensed financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) . The guidance in ASU 2016-02 supersedes the lease recognition requirements in ASC Topic 840, Leases (FAS 13). The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record an ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. Early adoption of the amendment in the update is permitted. While the Company is currently evaluating the effect this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and timing of adoption, we expect that upon adoption, the Company will recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities and those amounts could be material. In September 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805), Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments, which simplifies the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in business combinations. The amendments require that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The amendments also require that the acquirer record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The ASU also requires an entity to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted ASU 2015-16 effective January 1, 2016, resulting in the recognition of adjustments to goodwill as described in Note 3 . In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) . This update outlines a single, comprehensive model for accounting for revenue from contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date by one year to January 1, 2018, while providing the option to early adopt the standard on the original effective date of January 1, 2017. The Company plans to adopt this update on January 1, 2018. The guidance can be adopted either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the adoption alternatives, which include utilizing a bottom-up approach to analyze the standard’s impact on our contract portfolio, comparing historical accounting policies and practices to the new standard to identify potential differences from applying the requirements of the new standard to its contracts. The Company has not yet selected a transition method and is currently evaluating the impact it may have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Basis of Presentation and Sig20

Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Schedule of Error Corrections and Prior Period Adjustments	In the current period, the Company has corrected this immaterial error such that above market leases are recorded in other non-current assets and below market leases are recorded in non-current liabilities as shown in the table below. (In thousands) December 31, 2015 Previous presentation Other non-current assets $ 1,218 Current presentation Other non-current assets $ 3,388 Other non-current liabilities $ 2,170 In the current period, the Company has corrected these immaterial errors such that net revenues and costs and expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2016, as adjusted below reflect the proper amount of (i) intercompany sales eliminations, (ii) costs related to the adjustment to the aggregate estimated fair value of acquired inventory and goodwill impairment, and (iii) changes in contingent consideration liabilities. See Note 3 for further discussion regarding the adjustment to the estimated fair value of inventory acquired and the impact on cost of goods sold. Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 (In thousands) As Previously Reported Additional Elimination Acquired Inventory Fair Value Adjustment Contingent Consideration Adjustment As Adjusted Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 Net revenues $ 32,795 $ (613 ) $ — $ 32,182 $ 34,234 $ 66,416 Cost of goods sold 18,329 (613 ) (634 ) 17,082 20,760 37,842 Change in fair value of contingent consideration liabilities (2,505 ) (1,500 ) (4,005 ) (2,977 ) (6,982 ) Goodwill impairment 43,300 2,000 45,300 — 45,300 Benefit for income taxes (3,320 ) 479 (2,841 ) (270 ) (3,111 )

Acquisitions (Tables)

Acquisitions (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Business Combinations [Abstract]
Schedule of Preliminary Amounts Recognized as of Acquisition Date for Each Major Class of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed	These estimates and assumptions as they relate to the three companies acquired after the IPO in 2015 are subject to additional changes during the purchase price measurement period and could change materially as the Company finalizes the valuations of these assets and liabilities. The measurement period is one year from the date of the acquisition. (In thousands) Opening Balance Sheet as Previously Reported Adjustments During the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Additional Adjustments for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Adjusted Opening Balance Sheet Cash and other current assets $ 8,666 $ — $ — $ 8,666 Inventories (i) 47,794 (7,260 ) (3,462 ) 37,072 Property and equipment (ii) 13,235 — — 13,235 Other non-current assets (iii) 5,271 — — 5,271 Intangible assets (iv) 37,396 1,620 90 39,106 Current liabilities (7,572 ) — — (7,572 ) Reserve for uncertain tax positions (5,760 ) — — (5,760 ) Deferred income taxes, net (v) (24,168 ) 2,386 1,372 (20,410 ) Non-current liabilities (422 ) — — (422 ) Total net identifiable assets acquired 74,440 (3,254 ) (2,000 ) 69,186 Goodwill 80,023 3,648 1,755 85,426 Total net assets acquired $ 154,463 $ 394 $ (245 ) $ 154,612
Schedule of Aggregate Gross Intangible Assets Acquired	The table below summarizes the aggregate gross intangible assets recorded: (In thousands) Trade names $ 6,122 Customer relationships 31,308 Covenants not to compete 1,676 Total $ 39,106
Schedule of Pro Forma Results of Operations	The following table shows the combined pro forma net revenues and net loss of the Company as if all acquisitions of its Subsidiaries had occurred on January 1, 2015: (In thousands) Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 2015 Net revenues $ 31,999 $ 63,387 Net loss $ (199 ) $ (3,039 ) Pro forma combined net revenues consisted of: (In thousands) Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 2015 Recycled OE parts and related products $ 27,349 $ 54,668 Other ancillary products (scrap) 4,650 8,719 Total $ 31,999 $ 63,387

Bank Credit Facility (Tables)

Bank Credit Facility (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]
Schedule of Long-term Debt Instruments	The following is a summary of the components of the Company ’s Credit Facility debt and amounts outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 : (In thousands) June 30, 2016 December 31, 2015 Obligations: Term loan $ 9,250 $ 9,625 Revolving credit facility 12,815 11,200 Total debt 22,065 20,825 Less: long-term debt issuance costs (292 ) (299 ) Less: short-term debt issuance costs (100 ) (88 ) Total debt, net of issuance costs 21,673 20,438 Less: current maturities, net of debt issuance costs (21,673 ) (793 ) Long-term debt, net of issuance costs $ — $ 19,645
Schedule of Maturities of Long-term Debt	(In thousands) 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revolving credit facility $ — $ — $ — $ 12,815 $ 12,815 Term loan 1,000 1,000 1,000 6,250 9,250 Debt issuance costs (113 ) (113 ) (113 ) (53 ) (392 ) Total $ 887 $ 887 $ 887 $ 19,012 $ 21,673

Share-Based Compensation (Table

Share-Based Compensation (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015
Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]
Compensation Costs Recognized During Period		The components of share-based compensation were as follows: (In thousands) Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Stock options $ 354 $ 62 $ 934 $ 62 Restricted stock grants 165 — 252 — Leesville bonus shares 249 285 790 285 Other restricted or unregistered share issuances — 131 50 131 Total share-based compensation $ 768 $ 478 $ 2,026 $ 478
Assumptions of Weighted Average Fair Value of Stock Options Granted	Based on the results of the model, the fair value of the stock options granted during the first six months of 2016 ranged from $1.20 to $1.54 per share using the following assumptions: Expected dividend yield — % Risk-free interest rate 1.3 - 1.85% Expected volatility 30.0 % Expected life of option 6.3 years
Summary of Stock Option Activity	Stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was as follows: Number of Options Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years Aggregate Intrinsic Value Outstanding on December 31, 2015 1,596,297 $ 9.02 Granted 35,000 4.21 Exercised — — Expired or forfeited — — Outstanding on June 30, 2016 1,631,297 $ 8.92 9.02 $ 8,000 Exercisable on June 30, 2016 429,316 $ 8.88 8.93 $ —
Restricted Stock Unit Activity	A summary of restricted stock units activity for the six months ended June 30, 2016 is as follows: Number of Awards Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share Unvested restricted stock units at December 31, 2015 150,000 $ 9.68 Granted 29,332 4.23 Forfeited — — Vested 19,332 4.00 Unvested restricted stock units at June 30, 2016 160,000 $ 9.37

Income_(Loss) per Share (Tables

Income/(Loss) per Share (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]
Schedule of Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted	The calculations of income (loss) per share are as follows: (In thousands except share data) Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Basic Income (Loss) per Common Share: Net income (loss) $ 1,393 $ (3,974 ) $ (39,969 ) $ (6,603 ) Net income (loss) allocable to Fenix Canada preferred shares 70 (175 ) (2,019 ) (239 ) Net income (loss) available to common shares $ 1,323 $ (3,799 ) $ (37,950 ) $ (6,364 ) Weighted-average common shares outstanding 19,799,664 11,388,524 19,732,005 7,003,537 Basic income (loss) per common share $ 0.07 $ (0.33 ) $ (1.92 ) $ (0.91 ) Diluted Income (Loss) per Common Share: Net income (loss) $ 1,393 $ (3,974 ) $ (39,969 ) $ (6,603 ) Net income (loss) allocable to Fenix Canada preferred shares 78 (175 ) (2,019 ) (239 ) Net income (loss) available to common shares $ 1,315 $ (3,799 ) $ (37,950 ) $ (6,364 ) Dilution from stock options and unvested RSUs 171,773 0 0 0 Weighted-average common shares outstanding 19,971,437 11,388,524 19,732,005 7,003,537 Diluted income (loss) per common share $ 0.07 $ (0.33 ) $ (1.92 ) $ (0.91 )

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]
Schedule of Goodwill	Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows: (In thousands) Balance as of December 31, 2015 $ 76,812 Purchase accounting allocation adjustments, as corrected (see Note 3) 5,648 Exchange rate effects 659 Balance before impairment 83,119 Impairment charge, as corrected (Note 2) (45,300 ) Balance as of March 31, 2016 $ 37,819 Exchange rate effects 1 Purchase accounting allocation adjustments (see Note 3) (245 ) Balance as of June 30, 2016 $ 37,575
Schedule of Effect on One-Percentage Change in Fair Value Input	The table below presents the decrease in the fair value of the reporting unit given a one percent increase in the discount rate or a one percent decrease in the long-term assumed annual revenue growth rate. A 10% change in the weighting of the discounted cash flow approach and the market approach would not have had a significant effect on the fair value of the reporting unit. Decrease in Fair Value of Reporting Unit (in thousands) Discount Rate - Increase by 1% $ 11,000 Long-term Growth Rate - Decrease by 1% $ 6,000

Description of Business - Addit

Description of Business - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2016	Mar. 31, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Product Information [Line Items]
Net proceeds from initial public offering						$ 0	$ 101,289,000
Net loss			$ 1,393,000		$ (3,974,000)	(39,969,000)	(6,603,000)	$ (26,000,000)
Cash used in operating activities								15,800,000
Goodwill impairment			0	$ 45,300,000	0	45,300,000	0
Stockholders' Equity, Including Portion Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest	$ 109,784,000		73,458,000			73,458,000		109,784,000
Working capital			3,500,000			3,500,000
Cash and cash equivalents	2,827,000		1,243,000		$ 19,044,000	1,243,000	$ 19,044,000	2,827,000	$ 453,000
Long-term debt	20,825,000		22,100,000			22,100,000		20,825,000
Term loan	20,438,000		21,673,000			21,673,000		20,438,000
Letter of credit			6,400,000			6,400,000
Adjustment to goodwill impairment						2,000,000
Subsequent Event [Member]
Product Information [Line Items]
Increase (Decrease) In Revenue, Net, Percentage		5.00%
Retained Earnings [Member]
Product Information [Line Items]
Net loss						(39,969,000)
Stockholders' Equity, Including Portion Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest	(30,787,000)		(70,756,000)			(70,756,000)		(30,787,000)
Senior Secured Credit Facility [Member]
Product Information [Line Items]
Long-term debt	11,200,000		12,815,000			12,815,000		11,200,000
Term loan			12,800,000			12,800,000
Term Loan [Member]
Product Information [Line Items]
Long-term debt	9,625,000		9,300,000			9,300,000		9,625,000
Secured Debt [Member] | Senior Secured Credit Facility [Member]
Product Information [Line Items]
Senior secured credit facility	$ 35,000,000							35,000,000
Term of revolving credit facility	5 years
Secured Debt [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member] | Senior Secured Credit Facility [Member]
Product Information [Line Items]
Senior secured credit facility	$ 25,000,000							$ 25,000,000
Term Loan [Member]
Product Information [Line Items]
Long-term debt			$ 9,250,000			$ 9,250,000
Subsidiaries [Member]
Product Information [Line Items]
Stock of indirect Canadian Subsidiary used to secure Credit Facility (as a percent)						66.00%

Basis of Presentation and Sig27

Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Details) $ in Thousands	May 19, 2015company	Jun. 30, 2016USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2016USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2015USD ($)company	Jun. 30, 2016USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2015USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2015USD ($)company
Error Corrections and Prior Period Adjustments Restatement [Line Items]
Inventories					$ (2,221)	$ 0
Number of businesses acquired | company	11			2			3
Net revenues		$ 34,234	$ 32,182	$ 11,471	66,416	11,471
Cost of goods sold		20,760	17,082	10,008	37,842	10,008
Change in fair value of contingent consideration liabilities		(2,977)	(4,005)	809	(6,982)	809
Goodwill impairment		0	45,300	0	45,300	0
Benefit for income taxes		(270)	(2,841)	$ (5,304)	$ (3,111)	$ (5,304)
Previous presentation
Error Corrections and Prior Period Adjustments Restatement [Line Items]
Net revenues			32,795
Cost of goods sold			18,329
Change in fair value of contingent consideration liabilities			(2,505)
Goodwill impairment			43,300
Benefit for income taxes			(3,320)
Other non-current assets
Error Corrections and Prior Period Adjustments Restatement [Line Items]
Above market long-term leases							$ 3,388
Other non-current assets | Previous presentation
Error Corrections and Prior Period Adjustments Restatement [Line Items]
Above market long-term leases, net							1,218
Other non-current liabilities
Error Corrections and Prior Period Adjustments Restatement [Line Items]
Below market long-term leases							$ 2,170
Additional Elimination [Member] | Additional Elimination
Error Corrections and Prior Period Adjustments Restatement [Line Items]
Net revenues			(613)
Cost of goods sold			(613)
Inventory Fair Value Adjustment [Member] | Additional Elimination
Error Corrections and Prior Period Adjustments Restatement [Line Items]
Net revenues			0
Cost of goods sold			(634)
Change in fair value of contingent consideration liabilities			(1,500)
Goodwill impairment			2,000
Benefit for income taxes			479
Beagell Group, Standard, Eiss, Go Auto, Jerry Brown, Leesville, Ocean County, Butler, Tri-City [Member]
Error Corrections and Prior Period Adjustments Restatement [Line Items]
Inventories		$ (3,462)	(7,260)
Number of businesses acquired | company	11
Beagell Group, Standard, Eiss, Go Auto, Jerry Brown, Leesville, Ocean County, Butler, Tri-City [Member] | Pro Forma
Error Corrections and Prior Period Adjustments Restatement [Line Items]
Inventories			$ 10,700

Acquisitions - Additional Infor

Acquisitions - Additional Information (Detail) $ in Thousands	May 19, 2015USD ($)company	Jun. 30, 2016USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2016USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2015USD ($)company	Jun. 30, 2016USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2015USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2015USD ($)company	Dec. 31, 2015USD ($)
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Benefit for income taxes		$ (270)	$ (2,841)	$ (5,304)	$ (3,111)	$ (5,304)
Number of businesses acquired | company	11			2			3
Inventories					(2,221)	0
Cost of goods sold		20,760	17,082	$ 10,008	37,842	10,008
Cash payments to acquire businesses	$ 110,900
Stock consideration issued	35,300
Contingent consideration liability	$ 8,400
Discounted cash flows projections period	15 years
Purchase accounting allocation adjustments, as corrected		(245)	5,648
Inventory mark up (percent)							90.00%	90.00%
Selling costs and profit margin (percent)								10.00%
Inventories, net		33,227			$ 33,227		$ 38,892	$ 38,892
Percentage of purchase price (percent)								1.00%
Survival period					3 years
Change in indemnification receivable		(427)		0	$ (2,516)	0
Amortization of intangible assets		900		$ 400	1,800	$ 400
Goodwill		37,575	37,819		37,575		76,812	$ 76,812
Minimum [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Acquired inventory conversion period								6 months
Estimated useful lives								1 year
Maximum [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Acquired inventory conversion period								9 months
Estimated useful lives								6 years
Percentage of purchase price (percent)								40.00%
Beagell Group, Standard, Eiss, Go Auto, Jerry Brown, Leesville, Ocean County, Butler, Tri-City [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Number of businesses acquired | company	11
Inventories		(3,462)	(7,260)
Total net assets acquired		154,612			154,612
Additional consideration		245	(394)
Intangible assets		90	1,620
Deferred income taxes, net		(1,372)	(2,386)
Purchase accounting allocation adjustments, as corrected		1,755	3,648
Total net identifiable assets acquired		2,000	3,254
Amortization of COGS					7,800
Goodwill		85,426			85,426
Beagell Group, Standard, Eiss, Go Auto, Jerry Brown, Leesville, Ocean County, Butler, Tri-City [Member] | Cost of Goods Sold [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Amortization of COGS		500			1,400
Beagell Group, Standard, Eiss, Go Auto, Jerry Brown, Leesville, Ocean County, Butler, Tri-City [Member] | Accounting Standards Update 2015-16 [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Inventories					2,221
Deferred income taxes, net					800
Inventory reduction charge					3,400
Reduction in initial inventory mark-up to fair value	$ 2,100				2,100
Change in value of inventory							1,300
Measurement Period Adjustments [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Cost of goods sold					(600)
Measurement Period Adjustments [Member] | Opening Inventory Mark-Up To Fair Value [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Cost of goods sold					(100)
Measurement Period Adjustments [Member] | Lower Value Of Acquired Inventory Sold [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Cost of goods sold					(500)
Reduced Inventory Mark up to Fair Value [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Benefit for income taxes					1,000
Previous presentation
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Benefit for income taxes			(3,320)
Cost of goods sold			$ 18,329
Previous presentation | Beagell Group, Standard, Eiss, Go Auto, Jerry Brown, Leesville, Ocean County, Butler, Tri-City [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Total net assets acquired							154,463	$ 154,463
Goodwill		$ 100			$ 100		$ 80,023	$ 80,023

Acquisitions - Schedule of Fair

Acquisitions - Schedule of Fair Values of Asset Acquired and Liabilities Assumed (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016	Mar. 31, 2016	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2015
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Goodwill	$ 37,575	$ 37,819	$ 37,575		$ 76,812
Purchase accounting allocation adjustments, as corrected	(245)	5,648
Adjustments During the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
Inventories			(2,221)	$ 0
Beagell Group, Standard, Eiss, Go Auto, Jerry Brown, Leesville, Ocean County, Butler, Tri-City [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Cash and other current assets	8,666		8,666
Inventories	37,072		37,072
Property and equipment	13,235		13,235
Other non-current assets	5,271		5,271
Intangible assets	39,106		39,106
Current liabilities	(7,572)		(7,572)
Reserve for uncertain tax positions	(5,760)		(5,760)
Deferred income taxes, net	(20,410)		(20,410)
Non-current liabilities	(422)		(422)
Total net identifiable assets acquired	69,186		69,186
Goodwill	85,426		85,426
Total net assets acquired	154,612		154,612
Purchase accounting allocation adjustments, as corrected	1,755	3,648
Adjustments During the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
Inventories	(3,462)	(7,260)
Other non-current assets	0	0
Intangible assets	90	1,620
Reserve for uncertain tax positions	0	0
Deferred income taxes, net	1,372	2,386
Total net identifiable assets acquired	(2,000)	(3,254)
Total net assets acquired	(245)	$ 394
Previous presentation | Beagell Group, Standard, Eiss, Go Auto, Jerry Brown, Leesville, Ocean County, Butler, Tri-City [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Cash and other current assets					8,666
Inventories					47,794
Property and equipment					13,235
Other non-current assets					5,271
Intangible assets					37,396
Current liabilities					(7,572)
Reserve for uncertain tax positions					(5,760)
Deferred income taxes, net					(24,168)
Non-current liabilities					(422)
Total net identifiable assets acquired					74,440
Goodwill	$ 100		$ 100		80,023
Total net assets acquired					$ 154,463

Acquisitions - Gross Intangible

Acquisitions - Gross Intangible Assets Acquired (Details) $ in Thousands	May 19, 2015USD ($)
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Aggregate gross intangible assets	$ 39,106
Trade Names [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Aggregate gross intangible assets	6,122
Customer Relationships [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Aggregate gross intangible assets	31,308
Covenants Not To Compete [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Aggregate gross intangible assets	$ 1,676

- Schedule of Pro Forma Results

- Schedule of Pro Forma Results of Operations (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended			6 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016	Mar. 31, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2015
Business Acquisition, Pro Forma Information [Abstract]
Net revenues	$ 34,234	$ 32,182	$ 11,471	$ 66,416	$ 11,471
Net loss	$ 1,393		(3,974)	$ (39,969)	(6,603)	$ (26,000)
Product Information [Line Items]
Revenue			31,999		63,387
Net loss			(199)		(3,039)
Recycled OEM Parts [Member]
Product Information [Line Items]
Revenue			27,349		54,668
Scrap, Warranty And Other [Member]
Product Information [Line Items]
Revenue			$ 4,650		$ 8,719

Bank Credit Facility - Addition

Bank Credit Facility - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2015	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2016	May 06, 2015
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Letter of credit		$ 6,400,000	$ 6,400,000
Debt issuance costs				$ 438,000
Amendment charges			52,000
Amortized debt issuance costs		25,000	47,000
Revolving Credit Facility [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Owed under the Credit Facility		22,100,000	22,100,000
Standby Letters of Credit [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Owed under the Credit Facility		$ 6,400,000	$ 6,400,000
Obligations [Member] | Secured Debt [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior secured credit facility	$ 35,000,000
Term of revolving credit facility	5 years
Obligations [Member] | Secured Debt [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior secured credit facility	$ 25,000,000
Obligations [Member] | Secured Debt [Member] | Term Loan [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Remaining borrowing capacity	10,000,000
Obligations [Member] | Secured Debt [Member] | United States of America, Dollars [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior secured credit facility	20,000,000
Obligations [Member] | Secured Debt [Member] | United States of America, Dollars [Member] | Letter of Credit [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior secured credit facility	7,500,000
Obligations [Member] | Secured Debt [Member] | Canada, Dollars [Members] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior secured credit facility	5,000,000
Obligations [Member] | Secured Debt [Member] | Canada, Dollars [Members] | Letter of Credit [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior secured credit facility	$ 2,500,000
Obligations [Member] | Secured Debt [Member] | United States [Member] | Overnight Federal Funds Rate Base [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Debt instrument, basis spread on variable rate			0.50%
Obligations [Member] | Secured Debt [Member] | United States [Member] | London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Debt instrument, basis spread on variable rate			1.00%
Obligations [Member] | Secured Debt [Member] | United States [Member] | Base Rate [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Initial margin of interest		2.75%	2.75%
Obligations [Member] | Secured Debt [Member] | United States [Member] | Canadian Dollar Offered Rate [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Debt instrument, basis spread on variable rate			0.50%
Subsidiaries [Member] | Canada [Member] | Term Loan [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Collateral amount (percent)			66.00%
Minimum [Member] | Obligations [Member] | Secured Debt [Member] | United States [Member] | Base Rate [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Initial margin of interest		3.57%	3.57%
Maximum [Member] | Obligations [Member] | Secured Debt [Member] | United States [Member] | Base Rate [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Initial margin of interest		4.66%	4.66%

Bank Credit Facility - Schedule

Bank Credit Facility - Schedule of Long-Term Obligations (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	May 06, 2015
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Long-term debt	$ 22,100	$ 20,825
Debt issuance costs			$ (438)
Total debt, net of issuance costs	21,673	20,438
Less: current maturities, net of debt issuance costs	(21,673)	(793)
Long-term debt, net of issuance costs	0	19,645
Long-term Debt [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt issuance costs	(292)	(299)
Long-term Debt, Current Maturities [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt issuance costs	(100)	(88)
Term Loan [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Long-term debt	9,300	9,625
Senior Secured Credit Facility [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Long-term debt	12,815	$ 11,200
Total debt, net of issuance costs	$ 12,800

Bank Credit Facility - Schedu34

Bank Credit Facility - Schedule of Future Minimum Repayment (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	May 06, 2015
Maturities of Long-term Debt, Before Debt Issuance
Total	$ 22,100	$ 20,825
Maturities of Long-term Debt [Abstract]
2,017	887
2,018	887
2,019	887
2,020	19,012
Total debt, net of issuance costs	21,673	$ 20,438
Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs [Abstract]
Total			$ (438)
Revolving Credit Facility [Member]
Maturities of Long-term Debt, Before Debt Issuance
2,017	0
2,018	0
2,019	0
2,020	12,815
Total	12,815
Term Loan [Member]
Maturities of Long-term Debt, Before Debt Issuance
2,017	1,000
2,018	1,000
2,019	1,000
2,020	6,250
Total	9,250
Debt Issuance Costs [Member]
Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs [Abstract]
2,017	(113)
2,018	(113)
2,019	(113)
2,020	(53)
Total	$ (392)

Contingent Consideration Liab35

Contingent Consideration Liabilities - Additional Information (Details) $ in Thousands	May 19, 2015USD ($)companyshares	Jun. 30, 2016USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2016USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2015USD ($)company	Jun. 30, 2016USD ($)shares	Jun. 30, 2015USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2015USD ($)company	Dec. 31, 2015USD ($)
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Number of businesses acquired | company	11			2			3
Contingent consideration liability	$ 8,400
Discount rate of contingent acquisition consideration (percent)					5.00%
Reduction in indemnification asset		$ 2,977	$ 4,005	$ (809)	$ 6,982	$ (809)
Exchange rate effect included in earnings					(500)
Jerry Brown [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Contingent consideration liability				2,500		2,500
Reduction in indemnification asset					(900)
Eiss Brothers, Inc and Canadian Founding Companies [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Contingent consideration liability				7,800		7,800
Reduction in indemnification asset		2,100			4,200
Exchange rate effect included in earnings		$ 0
Profitability and Earnings Targets [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Contingent consideration liability							$ 10,200	$ 10,200
Revenue Target [Member] | Jerry Brown [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Contingent consideration liability				1,800		1,800
Reduction in indemnification asset					$ 2,300			$ (5,100)
Revenue Target [Member] | Canadian Founding Companies [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Contingent consideration liability				5,900		5,900
EBITDA [Member] | Jerry Brown [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Contingent consideration liability				3,500		3,500
EBITDA [Member] | Eiss Brothers [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Contingent consideration liability				$ 200		$ 200
Common Stock [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Contingent consideration (in shares) | shares	11,667				11,667
Exchangeable Preferred Stock [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Contingent consideration (in shares) | shares	280,000

Common Stock and Preferred Sh36

Common Stock and Preferred Shares - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	May 19, 2015	Jan. 31, 2015	Jan. 31, 2014	Apr. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015	Apr. 30, 2015	Mar. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015	Jan. 02, 2014
Class of Stock [Line Items]
Common stock issued in public offering (in shares)	13,800,000		1,800,000	402,000			546,927
Share price (in dollars per share)				$ 5			$ 6.50	$ 4.60	$ 6.79
Shares issued upon conversion (in shares)							20,000
Shares issued (in dollars per share)							$ 7.50
Stock issuance costs		$ 131
Net proceeds from initial public offering					$ 0	$ 101,289
Proceeds from IPO, net	$ 101,300
Share price threshold (in dollars per share)											$ 10
Fenix Parts Canada Inc [Member] | Exchangeable Preferred Stock [Member]
Class of Stock [Line Items]
Number of preferred shares issued (in shares)	1,050,000
IPO [Member]
Class of Stock [Line Items]
Share price (in dollars per share)	$ 8
Net proceeds from initial public offering	$ 110,400
Shares transferred (in shares)										237,231
Over-Allotment Option [Member]
Class of Stock [Line Items]
Common stock issued in public offering (in shares)	1,700,000

Share-Based Compensation - Addi

Share-Based Compensation - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		5 Months Ended	6 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015	May 24, 2016	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2015
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Compensation expense	$ 0	$ 131		$ 50	$ 131
Board Members [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Stock options, service period						1 year
Employee Stock Option [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Stock options, life						10 years
Vesting period						4 years
Unrecognized compensation costs related to stock option awards	2,600			$ 2,600
Unrecognized compensation costs related to stock option awards weighted average period				3 years
May 13, 2015 Management Grant [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected dividend yield (percent)				0.00%		0.00%
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares issued				29,332
Number of shares vested				19,332
Bonus Shares [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock	$ 1,200			$ 1,200
Compensation expense			$ 100
Unrecognized compensation costs related to stock option awards weighted average period				3 years 6 months
Number of shares vested			19,332
ESP [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares reserved for share-based awards			750,000
Leesville Bonus Shares [Member] | Bonus Shares [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period						12 months
Number of shares issued						271,112
2014 Incentive Stock Plan [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares reserved for share-based awards	2,750,000			2,750,000
Number of shares available for share based awards	754,000			754,000
2014 Incentive Stock Plan [Member] | Restricted Stock Units And Restricted Stock Awards [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement By Share-Based Payment Award, Equity Instruments Other Than Options, Decrease In Number Of Shares Available For Each Award Issued				2
Minimum [Member] | Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period				4 years
Maximum [Member] | Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period				5 years
Operating Expense [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Compensation expense	$ 768	478		$ 2,026	478
Operating Expense [Member] | Employee Stock Option [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Compensation expense	354	62		934	62
Operating Expense [Member] | Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Compensation expense	165	0		252	0
Operating Expense [Member] | Leesville Bonus Shares [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Compensation expense	$ 249	$ 285		$ 790	$ 285

Share-Based Compensation - Assu

Share-Based Compensation - Assumptions of Weighted Average Fair Value of Stock Options Granted (Detail) - $ / shares	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Weighted average exercise price, shares granted (USD per share)	$ 4.21
May 13, 2015 Management Grant [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected dividend yield (percent)	0.00%	0.00%
Expected volatility (percent)	30.00%
Expected life of option	6 years 3 months 18 days
Minimum [Member] | May 13, 2015 Management Grant [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Weighted average exercise price, shares granted (USD per share)	$ 1.20
Risk-free interest rate (percent)	1.30%
Maximum [Member] | May 13, 2015 Management Grant [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Weighted average exercise price, shares granted (USD per share)	$ 1.54
Risk-free interest rate (percent)	1.85%

Share-Based Compensation - Shar

Share-Based Compensation - Share-Based Compensation Costs (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Compensation Cost [Line Items]
Compensation expense	$ 0	$ 131	$ 50	$ 131
Operating Expense [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Compensation Cost [Line Items]
Compensation expense	768	478	2,026	478
Employee Stock Option [Member] | Operating Expense [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Compensation Cost [Line Items]
Compensation expense	354	62	934	62
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member] | Operating Expense [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Compensation Cost [Line Items]
Compensation expense	165	0	252	0
Leesville Bonus Shares [Member] | Operating Expense [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Compensation Cost [Line Items]
Compensation expense	$ 249	$ 285	$ 790	$ 285

Share-Based Compensation - Summ

Share-Based Compensation - Summary of Stock Option Activity (Detail) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016USD ($)$ / sharesshares
Number of Options
Number of Options, Outstanding beginning balance (in shares) | shares	1,596,297
Number of Options, Granted (in shares) | shares	35,000
Number of Options, Exercised (in shares) | shares	0
Number of Options, Expired or forfeited (in shares) | shares	0
Number of Options, Outstanding ending balance (in shares) | shares	1,631,297
Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share, Outstanding beginning balance (USD per share) | $ / shares	$ 9.02
Weighted average exercise price, shares granted (USD per share) | $ / shares	4.21
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share, Exercised (USD per share) | $ / shares	0
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share, Expired or forfeited (USD per share) | $ / shares	0
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share, Outstanding ending balance (USD per share) | $ / shares	$ 8.92
Number of Options, Exercisable ending balance (in shares) | shares	429,316
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share, Exercisable Ending Balance (in dollars per share) | $ / shares	$ 8.88
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years, Outstanding	9 years 7 days
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years, Exercisable	8 years 11 months 5 days
Aggregate Intrinsic Value Outstanding, Ending Balance | $	$ 8
Aggregate Intrinsic Value Exercisable, Ending Balance | $	$ 0

Share-Based Compensation - Rest

Share-Based Compensation - Restricted Stock Unit Activity (Details) - Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member] - $ / shares	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Equity Instruments Other than Options, Nonvested, Number of Shares [Roll Forward]
Unvested restricted stock units, beginning balance (Shares)	160,000	150,000
Unvested restricted stock units, granted (Shares)	29,332
Unvested restricted stock units, forfeited (shares)	0
Unvested restricted stock units, vested (Shares)	(19,332)
Unvested restricted stock units, ending balance (Shares)	160,000	150,000
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Equity Instruments Other than Options, Nonvested, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value [Abstract]
Unvested restricted stock units, weighted average grant date fair value, beginning balance (USD per share)	$ 9.37	$ 9.68
Unvested restricted stock units, weighted average grant date fair value, grants (USD per share)	4.23
Unvested restricted stock units, weighted average grant date fair value, forfeited (USD per share)	0
Unvested restricted stock units, weighted average grant date fair value, vested (USD per share)	4
Unvested restricted stock units, weighted average grant date fair value, ending balance (USD per share)	$ 9.37	$ 9.68

Income_(Loss) per Share (Detail

Income/(Loss) per Share (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	May 19, 2015	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2015
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Net loss		$ 1,393	$ (3,974)	$ (39,969)	$ (6,603)	$ (26,000)
Net income (loss) allocable to Fenix Canada preferred shares		70	(175)	(2,019)	(239)
Net income (loss) available to common shares		1,323	(3,799)	(37,950)	(6,364)
Net income (loss) allocable to Fenix Canada preferred shares		78	(175)	(2,019)	(239)
Net income (loss) available to common shares		$ 1,315	$ (3,799)	$ (37,950)	$ (6,364)
Weighted average common shares outstanding, Basic (in dollars per share)		19,799,664	11,388,524	19,732,005	7,003,537
Earnings/(loss) per share, Basic (in dollars per share)		$ 0.07	$ (0.33)	$ (1.92)	$ (0.91)
Dilution from stock options and unvested RSUs (in shares)		171,773	0	0	0
Weighted average common shares outstanding, Diluted (in dollars per share)		19,971,437	11,388,524	19,732,005	7,003,537
Earnings/(loss) per share, Diluted (in dollars per share)		$ 0.07	$ (0.33)	$ (1.92)	$ (0.91)
Common Stock [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Contingent consideration (in shares)	11,667			11,667
Exchangeable Preferred Stock [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Contingent consideration (in shares)	280,000
Fenix Parts Canada Inc [Member] | Exchangeable Preferred Stock [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Contingent consideration (in shares)				280,000

Income Taxes - Additional Infor

Income Taxes - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2015
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Effective tax rate (percent)			(7.20%)	(44.50%)
U.S. federal statutory rate (percent)			34.00%
Reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions			$ 2,700
Tax position, interest and penalties			$ 1,400
Period for payments made for assumed uncertain tax positions to be indemnified by previous owners			3 years
Reserve for uncertain tax positions	$ 3,075		$ 3,075		$ 5,733
Accrued interest and penalties	1,000		1,000
Change in indemnification receivable	427	$ 0	2,516	$ 0
Indemnification receivables	$ 2,562		$ 2,562		$ 5,078

Goodwill and Intangible Asset44

Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Details) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	Oct. 01, 2015	Jun. 30, 2016USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2016USD ($)$ / shares	Jun. 30, 2015USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2016USD ($)reporting_unitsegment	Jun. 30, 2015USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2015USD ($)$ / shares	Apr. 30, 2015$ / shares	Apr. 30, 2014$ / shares
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]
Number of operating segments | segment					1
Number of reporting units | reporting_unit					1
Value decline in stock price (percent)			32.00%
Share price (in dollars per share) | $ / shares			$ 4.60				$ 6.79	$ 6.50	$ 5
WACC (percent)	10.00%		13.00%
Terminal growth rate (percent)	3.00%		3.00%
Goodwill impairment		$ 0	$ 45,300	$ 0	$ 45,300	$ 0
Intangible assets, net		$ 34,300	$ 35,200		$ 34,300		$ 33,786

Goodwill and Intangible Asset45

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Schedule of Goodwill Rollforward (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended			6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016	Mar. 31, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015
Goodwill [Roll Forward]
Beginning Balance	$ 37,819	$ 76,812		$ 76,812
Purchase accounting allocation adjustments, as corrected (see Note 3)	(245)	5,648
Exchange rate effects	1	659
Balance before impairment		83,119
Impairment charge, as corrected (Note 2)	0	(45,300)	$ 0	(45,300)	$ 0
Ending Balance	$ 37,575	$ 37,819		$ 37,575

Goodwill and Intangible Asset46

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Effect of One Percentage Change in Input (Details) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2016USD ($)
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]
Discount Rate - Increase by 1%	$ 11,000
Long-term Growth Rate - Decrease by 1%	$ 6,000

Commitments and Contingencies (

Commitments and Contingencies (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2016
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Rental expense	$ 0.8	$ 1.6