CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. KSOP
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2021 and 2020
9
amount that would be
paid to transfer the
liability to a new
obligor in a transaction
between such parties, not
the amount
that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor.
•
Level 1
- Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
•
Level 2
- Inputs
other than quoted
prices included in
Level 1 that
are observable
for the asset
or liability,
either directly or indirectly, including:
◦
Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets
◦
Quoted prices for identical or similar assets in non-active markets
◦
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability
◦
Inputs derived principally from or corroborated by other observable market data
•
Level 3
- Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability that are supported by little or no market activity and
that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities
The asset or liability’s
fair value measurement level
within the fair value hierarchy
is based on the lowest
level of
any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Valuation
techniques used need to maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
The following is
a description of
the valuation methodologies
used for assets
measured at fair
value.
There have
been no changes in the methodologies used at December 31, 2021 or 2020:
Interest-bearing cash
:
This investment is valued at historical cost, which approximates fair value.
Common stock and mutual funds
:
These investments are valued based
on quoted market prices at
the end
Common collective
trust funds
:
These investments
are valued
based on
the net
asset value
(“NAV”)
of
units held by the
Plan at year end,
as calculated by the issuer, as
a practical expedient to estimate
fair value.
NAV
is calculated based on the fair value of the underlying assets owned by the fund, minus its liabilities,
divided by the number of units outstanding.
The preceding methods described may produce a fair
value calculation that may not be indicative
of net realizable
value
or
reflective
of
future
fair
values.
Furthermore,
although
the
Plan
believes
its
valuation
methods
are
appropriate
and
consistent
with
other
market
participants,
the
use
of
different
methodologies
or
assumptions
to
determine the
fair value
of certain
financial instruments
could result
in a
different fair
value measurement
at the
reporting date.