Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Description of Business On December 17, 2014, B/E Aerospace, Inc. ( “B/E Aerospace” or “Former Parent”) created an independent public company through a spin ‑off of its Aerospace Solutions Group (“ASG”) and Energy Services Group (“ESG”) businesses to Former Parent’s stockholders (“Spin ‑Off”). To effect the Spin ‑Off, B/E Aerospace distributed 52.5 million shares of KLX Inc. (“KLX” or the “Company”) common stock to B/E Aerospace’s stockholders on December 17, 2014. Holders of B/E Aerospace’s common stock received one share of KLX common stock for every two shares of B/E Aerospace’s common stock held on December 5, 2014. B/E Aerospace structured the distribution to be tax free to its U.S. stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result of the Spin ‑Off, KLX now operates as an independent, publicly traded company. Basic and diluted earnings per common share and the average number of common shares outstanding were retros pectively restated for the year ended December 31, 2013 for the number of KLX shares outstanding immediately following the transaction. We believe, based on our experience in the industry, that we are the world’s leading distributor and value ‑added service provider of aerospace fasteners and other consumables, offering one of the broadest ranges of aerospace hardware and consumables and inventory management services, selling to essentially every major airline in the world as well as leading maintenance, repair and overhaul (“MRO”) providers, the leading airframe manufacturers and their first and second tier suppliers. The Company also provides technical services and associated rental equipment to land ‑based oil and gas exploration and drilling companies often in remote locations. Basis of Presentation On February 24, 2015, the Board of Directors approved a change in the Company’s fiscal year end from December 31 to January 31. This change to the new reporting cycle began February 1, 2015. As a result of the change, the Company is reporting a January 2015 fiscal month transition period. The Company’s consolidated and combined financial statements include KLX and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Prior to the Spin ‑Off on December 17, 2014, KLX’s financial statements were derived from B/E Aerospace’s consolidated and combined financial statements and accounting records as if it was operated on a stand ‑alone basis and were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). All intercompany transactions and account balances within the Company have been eliminated. The consolidated and combined statements of earnings and comprehensive income for the periods prior to the spin-off reflect allocations of general corporate expenses from B/E Aerospace, including, but not limited to, executive management, finance, legal, information technology, human resources, employee benefits administration, treasury, risk management, procurement and other shared services. The allocations were made on a direct usage basis when identifiable, with the remainder allocated on the basis of revenues generated, costs incurred, headcount or other measures. Management of the Company considers these allocations to be a reasonable reflection of the utilization of services by, or the benefits provided, to the Company. The allocations may not, however, reflect the expense the Company would have incurred as a stand ‑alone company for the periods presented. Actual costs that may have been incurred if the Company had been a stand ‑alone company would depend on a number of factors, including the chosen organizational structure, what functions were outsourced or performed by employees and strategic decisions made in areas such as information technology and infrastructure. Use of Estimates —The preparation of the consolidated and combined financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Revenue Recognition —Sales of products and services are recorded when the earnings process is complete. This generally occurs when the products are shipped to the customer in accordance with the contract or purchase order, risk of loss and title has passed to the customer, collectability is reasonably assured and pricing is fixed and determinable. In instances where title does not pass to the customer upon shipment, the Company recognizes revenue upon delivery or customer acceptance, depending on the terms of the sales contract. In connection with the sales of its products, the Company also provides certain supply chain management services to certain of its customers. These services include the timely replenishment of products at the customer site, while also minimizing the customer’s on ‑hand inventory. These services are provided by the Company contemporaneously with the delivery of the product, and as such, once the product is delivered, the Company does not have a post ‑delivery obligation to provide services to the customer. The price of such services is generally included in the price of the products delivered to the customer, and revenue is recognized upon delivery of the product, at which point, the Company has satisfied its obligations to the customer. The Company does not account for these services as a separate element, as the services do not have stand ‑alone value and cannot be separated from the product element of the arrangement. Service revenues from oilfield technical services and related rental equipment are recorded when services are performed and/or equipment is rented pursuant to a completed purchase order or master services agreement (“MSA”) that sets forth firm pricing and payment terms. Income Taxes —The Company provides deferred income taxes for temporary differences between the amounts of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and such amounts recognized for income tax purposes. Deferred income taxes are computed using enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. A valuation allowance related to a deferred tax asset is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company records uncertain tax positions within income tax expense and classifies interest and penalties related to income taxes as income tax expense. Cash Equivalents —The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Accounts Receivable, Net —The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current creditworthiness, as determined by review of their current credit information. The Company continuously monitors collections and payments from its customers and maintains a provision for estimated credit losses based upon historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that have been identified. The allowance for doubtful accounts at January 31, 2016 and 2015 was $11.3 and $8.0 , respectively. Inventories —Inventories, made up of finished goods, primarily consist of aerospace fasteners and consumables. The Company values inventories at the lower of cost or market, using first ‑in, first ‑out or weighted average cost method. The Company regularly reviews inventory quantities on hand and records a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based primarily on historical demand, estimated product demand to support contractual supply agreements with its customers and the age of the inventory among other factors. Demand for the Company’s products can fluctuate from period to period depending on customer activity. In accordance with industry practice, costs in inventory include amounts relating to long-term contracts with long production cycles and to inventory items with long production cycles, some of which are not expected to be realized within one year. Reserves for excess and obsolete i nventory were approximately $40.4 and $33.5 as of January 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Substantially all of our inventory is comprised of aerospace grade fasteners which support OEM production and the aftermarket over the life of the airframe. Inventory with a limited shelf life is continually monitored and reserved for in advance of expiration. The provision for inventory with limited shelf life is relatively insignificant and has not exceeded $0.5 during the past three years. Property and Equipment, Net —Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated generally under the straight ‑line method over their estimated useful lives of one to fifty years (or the lesser of the term of the lease for leasehold improvements, as appropriate). Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net —Under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 350, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”), goodwill and indefinite ‑lived intangible assets are reviewed at least annually for impairment. Acquired intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over their individual useful lives. O ther intangible assets are amortized using the straight ‑line method over periods ranging from four to thirty years. As of January 31, 2016, the Company had two reporting units, which were determined based on the guidelines contained in FASB ASC Topic 350, Subtopic 20, Section 35. Each reporting unit constitutes a business, for which there is discrete financial information available that is regularly reviewed by the management of the Company. Goodwill is tested at least annually as of December 31 st , and management assesses whether there has been any impairment in the value of goodwill by first comparing the fair value to the net carrying value of the reporting units. If the carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment. An impairment loss is recognized if the implied fair value of the asset being tested is less than its carrying value. In this event, the asset is written down accordingly. The fair values of the reporting units for goodwill impairment testing is determined using valuation techniques based on estimates, judgments and assumptions management believes are appropriate in the circumstances. The Company considered the continuing downturn in the oil and gas industry, including the nearly 75% decrease in the number of onshore drilling rigs, and the resulting significant cutbacks in capital expenditures by our oil and gas customers and which has resulted in a decrease in both volume and pricing for oil field services, to be an indicator of impairment of goodwill of the ESG reporting unit. The Company performed the first step of its goodwill impairment analysis as of August 31, 2015 and determined the carrying value of the ESG reporting unit exceeds its fair value. The Company completed the second step of its goodwill impairment analysis comparing the implied fair value of that reporting unit’s goodwill to the carrying amount of that goodwill and determined goodwill related to the ESG reporting unit was fully impaired and recorded an impairment charge. Accordingly, the Company recorded a pre-tax impairment charge related to ESG’s goodwill of $310.4 . For the one month ended January 31, 2015 and the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company’s annual impairment testing yielded no impairments of goodwill or the indefinite ‑lived intangible asset. The indefinite ‑lived intangible asset is tested at least annually for impairment. Impairment for the intangible asset with an indefinite life exists if the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value. The fair value of the indefinite ‑lived intangible asset is determined using valuation techniques based on estimates, judgments and assumptions management believes are appropriate in the circumstances. Long ‑Lived Assets —The Company assesses potential impairments to its long ‑lived assets when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recovered. An impairment loss is recognized when the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset (or group of assets) is less than its carrying amount. Any required impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the asset’s carrying value exceeds its fair value and is recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of the related asset and a charge to operating results. As a result of the continuing downturn in the oil and gas industry previously mentioned, the Company assessed its ESG asset group’s long-lived assets for impairment and determined the carrying value was not recoverable as of August 31, 2015. The Company used a combination of a cost and market approaches for determining the fair value of the ESG asset group ’ s long lived assets and recognized impairment charges related to identified intangibles and property and equipment of $177.8 and $152.0 , respectively. For the one month ended January 31, 2015 and the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, there were no impairments of long lived assets. Common Stock equivalents —The Company has potential common stock equivalents related to its outstanding restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and employee stock purchase plan. These potential common stock equivalents are not included in diluted loss per share for any period presented in which there is a net loss because the effect would have been anti ‑dilutive. Accounting for Stock ‑Based Compensation —The Company accounts for share ‑based compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), whereby share ‑based compensation cost is measured on the date of grant, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized over the requisite service period. Compensation cost recognized during the two years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 related to grants of restricted stock and restricted stock units granted by our Former Parent. No compensation cost related to stock options was recognized during those periods as no options were granted during the two year period ended December 31, 2014, and all outstanding options were vested. All unvested shares of restricted stock were converted into unvested shares of KLX on the distribution date at a ratio equal to 1.8139 . Compensation cost recognized during the year ended January 31, 2016 (“Fiscal 2015”) and the one month ended January 31, 2015 related to unvested shares converted on the distribution date and new shares of KLX restricted stock and stock options granted during 2015. The Company has established a qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Employee Stock Purchase Plan allows qualified employees (as defined in the plan) to participate in the purchase of designated shares of KLX’s common stock at a price equal to 85% of the closing price for each semi ‑annual stock purchase period. The fair value of employee purchase rights represents the difference between the closing price of KLX’s shares on the date of purchase and the purchase price of the shares. The value of the rights under this Plan (and that of our Former Parent’s) granted during the years ended January 31, 2016, December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $0.3 , $0.2 and $0.2 , respectively, and was not material during the one month ended January 31, 2015. Foreign Currency Translation —The assets and liabilities of subsidiaries located outside the United States are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet dates. Revenue and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are recognized currently in income, and those resulting from translation of financial statements are accumulated as a separate component of Former Parent company equity and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The Company’s European subsidiaries primarily utilize the British pound or the Euro as their local functional currency. Treasury Stock - The Company may periodically repurchase shares of its common stock from employees for the satisfaction of their individual payroll tax withholding upon vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units in connection with the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) . The Company’s repurchases of common stock are recorded at the average cost of the common stock. As part of the LTIP, t he Company repurchased 32,122 shares of its common stock for $1.0 during the year ended January 31, 201 6 . On January 7, 2016 , the Board of Directors authorized a $100.0 share repurchase under the existing $250.0 share repurchase program. During Fiscal 2015, the Company repurchased 416,200 shares of common stock at an average price of $27.48 per share for a total of $11.4 . Concentration of Risk —The Company’s products and services are primarily concentrated within the aerospace industry with customers consisting primarily of commercial airlines, a wide variety of business jet customers and commercial aircraft manufacturers. The Company’s management performs ongoing credit evaluations on the financial condition of all of its customers and maintains allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable based on expected collectability. Credit losses have historically been within management’s expectations and the provisions established. Significant customers change from year to year, in the case of ASG, depending on the level of refurbishment activity and/or the level of new aircraft purchases by such customers, and in the case of ESG, depending on the level of exploration and production activity and the use of our services. During th e years ended January 31, 2016 and December 31, 2014, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s consolidated revenues. During the year ended December 31, 2013, two customers accounted for approximately 10% each of the Company’s combined revenues. No other individual customers accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s combined revenues during the year ended December 31, 2013. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes existing guidance on accounting for leases in "Leases (Topic 840)" and generally requires all leases to be recognized in the statement of financial position. The provisions of ASU 2016-02 are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018; early adoption is permitted. The provisions of this ASU are to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements. In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740). ASU 2015-17 requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. ASU 2015-17 is effective either prospectively or retrospectively for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company has elected to early adopt ASU 2015-17 as of January 31, 2016 and retrospectively applied ASU 2015-17 to all periods presented. As of January 31, 2015 the Company reclassified $37.1 million of deferred tax assets from current assets to the noncurrent liability section of the consolidated balance sheets. In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805). ASU 2015-16 requires that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The amendments in this update require that the acquirer record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The amendments in this update require an entity to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. ASU 2015-16 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2015-16 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In July 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. ASU 2015-11 requires that inventory be measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Inventory measured using last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) or the retail inventory method are excluded from the scope of this update which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of ASU 2015-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In April 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which updated the guidance in ASC Topic 835, Interest. In August 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements, which clarifies the guidance in ASU 2015-03 regarding presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. The updated guidance is effective retrospectively for annual periods and interim periods within the annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including early adoption in an interim period. The amendment requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. The Company adopted these ASUs effective January 31, 2016 and has presented debt issuance costs related to its 5.875% senior unsecured notes of $20.5 and $22.8 as of January 31, 2016 and January 31, 2015, respectively, as a direct deduction from the carrying amounts of its debt liabilities. The January 31, 2015 amount was previously recorded in other assets. In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation, which updated the guidance in ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASC Topic 718”). The update is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. ASU 2014-12 brings consistency to the accounting for share-based payment awards that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards. The guidance permits two implementation approaches, either prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date, or retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In May 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which updated the guidance in ASC Topic 606, Revenue Recognition. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should identify the contract(s) with a customer, identify the performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date. The amendments in this update deferred the effective date for implementation of ASU 2014-09 by one year and is now effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 including interim reporting periods within that period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and disclosures and is currently unable to estimate the impact of adopting this guidance. |