Commitments and Contingencies | Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies Litigation In the ordinary course of our business, we are subject to claims and administrative proceedings, none of which we believe are material or would be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations. Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement entered into with Windstream in connection with the Spin-Off, Windstream has agreed to indemnify us (including our subsidiaries, directors, officers, employees and agents and certain other related parties) for any liability arising from or relating to legal proceedings involving Windstream's telecommunications business prior to the Spin-Off, and, pursuant to the Master Lease, Windstream has agreed to indemnify us for, among other things, any use, misuse, maintenance or repair by Windstream with respect to the Distribution Systems. Windstream is currently a party to various legal actions and administrative proceedings, including various claims arising in the ordinary course of its telecommunications business, which are subject to the indemnities provided to us by Windstream. If Windstream assumes the Separation and Distribution Agreement and/or the Master Lease in bankruptcy, it would be obligated to honor all indemnification claims arising under such agreement. If the Separation and Distribution Agreement and or the Master Lease are rejected in Windstream’s bankruptcy, any claims on the applicable indemnity would be treated as unsecured claims, and, if that were to occur, there can be no assurance we would receive any related indemnification payments from Windstream in connection with the applicable indemnity claims. On July 25, 2019, Rejection . In bankruptcy, Windstream has the option to assume or reject the Master Lease. Because the Master Lease is a single indivisible Master Lease with a single rent payment, it must be assumed or rejected in whole and cannot be sub-divided by facility or market. A significant amount of Windstream’s revenue is generated from the use of our network included in the Master Lease, and we believe that the Master Lease is essential to Windstream’s operations. Furthermore, Windstream is designated as a “carrier of last resort” in certain markets where it utilizes the Master Lease to provide service to its customers, and we believe Windstream would require approval from the applicable PUC and the FCC to cease providing service in those markets. As a result, although we can provide no assurances, we believe the probability of Windstream rejecting the Master Lease in bankruptcy to be remote. A rejection of the Master Lease, or even a temporary disruption in payments to us, would require us to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of our properties and avoid the imposition of liens on our properties and could impact our ability to fund other cash obligations, including dividends necessary to maintain REIT status, non-essential capital expenditures and our debt service obligations and could otherwise affect our ability to maintain REIT status. A rejection of the Master Lease by Windstream could result in an “event of default” under our Credit Agreement if we are unable to enter into a replacement lease that satisfies certain criteria set forth in the Credit Agreement within ninety (90) calendar days and we do not maintain pro forma compliance with a consolidated secured leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, of 5.00 to 1.00. An acceleration of debt under our senior secured credit facilities due to an uncured “event of default” under our Credit Agreement would also result in an “event of default” under the terms of our outstanding notes. Such an “event of default” would give the holders of the applicable debt obligation the right to accelerate our repayment obligations relating to such debt. The Master Lease contains no provision that contemplates renegotiation of the lease and the bankruptcy court has no ability to unilaterally reset the rent or terms of the lease. In addition, our Credit Agreement prohibits us from amending the Master Lease in a manner that, among other provisions, pro forma for any such amendment, would result in our consolidated secured leverage ratio exceeding 5.00 to 1.00, and management has no intention to enter into a lease amendment that would violate our debt covenants. However, it is difficult to predict what could occur in Windstream’s bankruptcy restructuring, including as a result of the adversary proceeding brought by Windstream related to the Master Lease if the Settlement is not implemented. Recharacterization / Pending Master Lease Litigation . On July 25, 2019, in connection with Windstream’s bankruptcy, Windstream Holdings and Windstream Services filed a complaint with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York against Uniti and certain of its affiliates, alleging¸ among other things, that (1) the Master Lease should be recharacterized as a financing arrangement, (2) rent payments and tenant capital improvements made by Windstream under the Master Lease since at least the third quarter of 2017 constitute constructive fraudulent transfers, (3) the Master Lease is a lease of personal property and (4) Uniti has breached its non-competition obligations to Windstream under the Master Lease, each of which allegations is discussed in more detail below. As described above, the trial for the recharacterization claim has been stayed. Recharacterization Were the Bankruptcy Court to hold that the Master Lease should be recharacterized as a financing arrangement, it could significantly affect or even eliminate current payments to us under the Master Lease and could significantly affect the ultimate treatment of our claims (including potentially through changing our status to that of a creditor that would share in creditor recoveries from the estate rather than receive rent payments). The Bankruptcy Court could determine that Windstream is the true owner of the property subject to the Master Lease, and we have argued that such property would be deemed to be owned by Windstream Holdings as the counterparty to the Master Lease and that Uniti would have a claim against Windstream Holdings that is secured by such property. Windstream has argued that such property would instead be owned by the operating subsidiaries that previously held it and that our claims would be against Windstream Holdings as the counterparty to the Master Lease. In such an event, the Bankruptcy Court would also determine if our claims are secured by an interest in the leased property. If the Bankruptcy Court were to determine that our claims are not secured by an interest in the leased property, our claims could be unsecured and structurally subordinated to the claims of creditors at Windstream Holdings’ subsidiaries, including Windstream Services. Windstream Services is the issuer of substantially all of Windstream’s debt obligations and certain of its operating subsidiaries guarantee such debt obligations. Were we to be treated as an unsecured creditor of Windstream Holdings, we would not be able to recover any value from Windstream Services or such other operating subsidiaries until all of their respective debt obligations have been satisfied and, in such event, the notes and the guarantees of the notes would only be secured on a first-priority basis by certain of our assets that do not constitute the property subject to the Master Lease. In the event of such an adverse determination, our ability to meet our debt and other obligations could be materially impaired. In addition, recharacterization of the Master Lease as a financing arrangement, depending on the findings of fact and law of, and remedies applied by, the Bankruptcy Court, could affect the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the Master Lease, our status as a REIT (see in Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 Constructive Fraudulent Transfer Master Lease for Personal Property . Windstream alleges that the Master Lease is a lease of personal property. If the Master Lease were determined to be a lease of personal property, the deadline for Windstream Holdings to assume or reject the Master Lease would be the confirmation of its plan of reorganization by the Bankruptcy Court, which would extend the deadline that would otherwise be applicable under the bankruptcy code if the Master Lease were treated as a lease of real property, and Windstream could seek from the Bankruptcy Court relief from its current performance obligations during the bankruptcy case. In addition, if the Master Lease were determined to be a lease of personal property, this could also impact our status as a REIT if the Internal Revenue Service were to determine that our gross income is not sufficiently derived from real property. On January 21, 2020, Windstream agreed to stay, without prejudice, its action seeking a determination that the Master Lease is a lease of personal property. Breach of Contract Mediation . Uniti, Windstream and Windstream’s creditors engaged in mediation in the Windstream bankruptcy to resolve claims brought by Windstream against Uniti, which culminated in the March 2, 2020 announcement of the Settlement. On May 8, 2020, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York approved the Settlement. Pursuant to the Settlement, Uniti and Windstream will agree to mutual releases with respect to any and all liability related to any claims and causes of action between them, including those relating to Windstream’s Chapter 11 proceedings and the Master Lease. Under the Settlement, Uniti will agree to make a $400 million cash payment to Windstream in equal installments over 20 consecutive quarters beginning the first month after Windstream’s emergence from bankruptcy at an annual interest rate of 9%, and Uniti may prepay any installments falling due on or after the first anniversary of the Settlement’s effective date (resulting in total payments ranging from $432-$490 million). Uniti will also transfer the proceeds from the sale of its common stock described below to Windstream. In exchange, Windstream will transfer to Uniti certain dark fiber indefeasible rights of use (“ Windstream and Uniti will also agree to bifurcate the Master Lease into two structurally similar, but independent, agreements to govern the ILEC and CLEC facilities, respectively. Certain copper CLEC assets will be governed under the New Lease relating to the ILEC facilities. The initial aggregate annual rent under the New Leases will be equal to the annual rent under the Master Lease currently in effect. Each of Windstream Holdings, Inc., Windstream Services, LLC, and certain subsidiaries and/or newly formed affiliated entities will become parties to the New Leases. The New Leases will contain cross-guarantees and cross-default provisions, which will remain effective as long as Windstream or an affiliate is a tenant under one of the New Leases. In addition, the New Leases will be amended to require that Windstream maintain certain financial covenants and to permit Uniti to transfer its rights and obligations and otherwise monetize or encumber the New Leases so long as it does not transfer interests to a Windstream competitor. Pursuant to the Settlement, Uniti will agree to fund up to an aggregate $1.75 billion in growth capital improvements in long-term fiber and related assets in certain ILEC and CLEC properties. Growth Capital Improvements will exclude maintenance or repair expenditures and expenditures toward fiber replacement in excess of $70 million per year and will be subject to Uniti’s approval based on underwriting standards to be included in the New Leases. Annual commitments by Uniti for the Growth Capital Improvements will comprise: $125 million in 2020; $225 million per year in 2021 through 2024; $175 million per year in 2025 and 2026; and $125 million per year in 2027 through 2029. Windstream will be entitled to reimbursement for any cumulative Growth Capital Improvements it incurs in excess of the foregoing annual amounts from the commitment amounts in a subsequent period. On the first anniversary of an installment of funding for a Growth Capital Improvement, the annual base rent payable by Windstream will increase by an amount equal to 8.0% of such installment of funding. The Rent Rate will thereafter increase to 100.5% of the prior Rent Rate in subsequent years. Pursuant to the Settlement, if Windstream is not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the New Leases, Uniti will not be required to fund Growth Capital Improvements. In the event Uniti defaults or otherwise fails to timely satisfy its obligations under the New Leases and Windstream is in compliance with the terms of the New Leases, then Windstream has the right to deduct from the subsequent rent payment or payments, amounts otherwise owed to Windstream. In connection with the Settlement, Uniti also entered into binding letters of intent on March 2, 2020 with certain first lien creditors of Windstream, pursuant to which Uniti will sell an aggregate of 38,633,470 shares of Uniti common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at $6.33 per share, which represents the closing price of Uniti common stock on the date when an agreement in principle of the basic outline of the Settlement was first reached (the “Settlement Common Stock”). Uniti will transfer the proceeds from the sale of the Settlement Common Stock to Windstream as additional settlement consideration. The issuance and sale of the Settlement Common Stock will be made in reliance upon the exemption from registration requirements pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Certain recipients of the Settlement Common Stock will be subject to a one-year Finally, on March 2, 2020, Uniti, Windstream and certain of Windstream’s creditors entered into a Plan Support Agreement. Pursuant to the Plan Support Agreement, the Parties agreed to support the Settlement and the approval of a plan of reorganization for Windstream on the terms and subject to the conditions described therein. The Plan Support Agreement is terminable by the Parties upon the occurrence of certain specified termination events, including, among other things, (i) the failure by Windstream to timely appeal any order by the bankruptcy court denying the Settlement or any order overturning an order approving the Settlement on appeal, and (ii) the issuance by a regulatory authority of an order enjoining, or the commencement of an action that could be reasonably expected to enjoin, material portions of the settlement or substantial consummation of the Settlement (subject to a 10 day cure period). The Settlement is subject to finalizing and executing definitive documentation, the receipt of certain regulatory approvals and other conditions precedent, including Uniti’s receipt of satisfactory “true lease” opinions confirming that the New Leases are “true leases” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Following satisfaction of all such conditions precedent, consummation of the Settlement will occur on the earlier of Windstream’s emergence from bankruptcy and February 28, 2021. All litigation between Windstream and Uniti, including matters referenced herein, is stayed while the parties implement the Settlement. While the Windstream Master Lease litigation is currently stayed, it is difficult to predict what could occur in Windstream’s bankruptcy restructuring. However, any adverse determination or judicial decision on one or more of the claims against us could materially adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition or, in certain circumstances, cause us to file for voluntary Chapter 11 protection. The Settlement, if effectuated, would result in mutual releases with respect to any and all liability related to any claims and causes of action that currently exist between Uniti and Windstream. As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we are unable to determine what, if any, portion of the consideration to be paid to Windstream would be classified as settlement of litigation, and therefore, we have not recorded any liabilities associated with these claims in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. However, we could incur a loss related to the Settlement in future periods. In addition, pursuant to the Master Lease, Windstream has agreed to indemnify us for, among other things, any use, misuse, maintenance or repair by Windstream with respect to the Distribution Systems. Windstream is currently a party to various legal actions and administrative proceedings, including various claims arising in the ordinary course of its telecommunications business, which are subject to the indemnities provided by Windstream to us. If Windstream assumes the Master Lease, it would be obligated to honor all indemnification claims. If Windstream were to reject the Master Lease, any indemnification claims would be treated as unsecured claims, and, if that were to occur, there can be no assurance we would receive any indemnification payments from Windstream. While these actions and proceedings are not believed to be material, individually or in the aggregate, the ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be predicted. The resolution of any such legal proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on Windstream’s business, financial position or results of operations, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations if Windstream is unable to meet its indemnification obligations . Other Litigation On July 3, 2019, SLF Holdings, LLC (“SLF”) filed a complaint against the Company, Uniti Fiber, and certain current and former officers of the Company (collectively, the “Defendants”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, in connection with Uniti Fiber’s purchase of Southern Light, LLC from SLF in July 2017. The complaint asserted claims for fraud and conspiracy, as well as claims under federal and Alabama securities laws, alleging that Defendants improperly failed to disclose to SLF the risk that the Spin-Off and entry into the Master Lease violated certain debt covenants of Windstream. On September 26, 2019, the action was transferred to United States District Court for the District of Delaware. On November 18, 2019, SLF filed an amended complaint, adding allegations that Defendants also failed to fully disclose the risk that the Master Lease purportedly could be recharacterized as a financing instead of “true lease.” The amended complaint seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as reformation of the purchase agreement for the sale. On December 18, 2019, Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety. That motion was fully briefed as of February 7, 2020, but no decision has been issued. We intend to defend this matter vigorously, and, because it is still in its preliminary stages, we have not yet determined what effect this lawsuit will have, if any, on our financial position or results of operations. As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we are unable to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss and therefore have not recorded any liabilities associated with these claims in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Ibrahim E. Safadi, Phil Queder and Michael Avery filed separate putative class actions in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas against the Company and certain of our officers on October 25, 2019, December 6, 2019, and December 23, 2019, respectively, alleging violations of the federal securities laws (the “Shareholder Actions”). The Shareholder Actions seek to represent investors who acquired the Company’s securities between April 20, 2015 and February 15, 2019 (in the case of the Safadi and Queder actions) and April 20, 2015 and June 24, 2019 (in the case of the Avery action). The Shareholder Actions assert violations under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, alleging that the Company made materially false and misleading statements by allegedly failing to disclose that the Spin-Off and entry into the Master Lease violated certain debt covenants of Windstream. The Shareholder Actions seek class certification, unspecified monetary damages, costs and attorneys’ fees and other relief. On March 12, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas consolidated the Shareholder Actions and appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel in the consolidated cases under the caption In re Uniti Group Inc. Securities Litigation Under the terms of the tax matters agreement entered into on April 24, 2015 by the Company, Windstream Services, LLC and Windstream (the “Tax Matters Agreement”), in connection with the Spin-Off, we are generally responsible for any taxes imposed on Windstream that arise from the failure of the Spin-Off and the debt exchanges to qualify as tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes, within the meaning of Section 355 and Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code, as applicable, to the extent such failure to qualify is attributable to certain actions, events or transactions relating to our stock, indebtedness, assets or business, or a breach of the relevant representations or any covenants made by us in the Tax Matters Agreement, the materials submitted to the IRS in connection with the request for the private letter ruling or the representations provided Commitments Growth Capital Expenditures |