Document and Entity Information
Document and Entity Information - shares | 6 Months Ended | |
Dec. 31, 2015 | Feb. 16, 2016 | |
Document And Entity Information | ||
Entity Registrant Name | First Priority Tax Solutions Inc. | |
Entity Central Index Key | 1,622,408 | |
Document Type | 10-Q | |
Document Period End Date | Dec. 31, 2015 | |
Amendment Flag | false | |
Current Fiscal Year End Date | --06-30 | |
Is Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer? | No | |
Is Entity a Voluntary Filer? | No | |
Is Entity's Reporting Status Current? | Yes | |
Entity Filer Category | Smaller Reporting Company | |
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | 5,740,000 | |
Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q2 | |
Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2,016 |
Balance Sheets
Balance Sheets - USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2015 | Jun. 30, 2015 |
Current Assets | ||
Cash | $ 5,560 | $ 7,275 |
Total current assets | 5,560 | 7,275 |
Real Estate | ||
Land | 15,000 | 15,000 |
Building | 60,000 | 60,000 |
Accumulated depreciation | (3,000) | (2,000) |
Real estate, net | 72,000 | 73,000 |
Total Assets | 77,560 | 80,275 |
Current Liabilities | ||
Accrued expenses | 68,227 | 66,512 |
Note payable | 85,000 | 85,000 |
Total current liabilities | 153,227 | $ 151,512 |
Non-current Liabilities | ||
Note payable - related party | 10,000 | |
Total non-current liabilities | 10,000 | |
Total liabilities | $ 163,227 | $ 151,512 |
Stockholders' Deficit | ||
Preferred stock par value $0.000001: 8,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding | ||
Common stock par value $0.000001: 92,000,000 shares authorized; 5,740,000 shares issued and outstanding | $ 6 | $ 6 |
Additional paid-in capital | 53,349 | 53,349 |
Accumulated deficit | (139,022) | (124,592) |
Total Stockholders' Deficit | (85,667) | (71,237) |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit | $ 77,560 | $ 80,275 |
Balance Sheets (Parenthetical)
Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) - $ / shares | Dec. 31, 2015 | Jun. 30, 2015 |
Stockholders' Equity | ||
Preferred stock, par value | $ 0.000001 | $ 0.000001 |
Preferred stock, shares authorized | 8,000,000 | 8,000,000 |
Preferred stock, shares issued | 0 | 0 |
Preferred stock, shares outstanding | 0 | 0 |
Common stock, par value | $ 0.000001 | $ 0.000001 |
Common stock, shares authorized | 92,000,000 | 92,000,000 |
Common stock, shares issued | 5,740,000 | 5,740,000 |
Common stock, shares outstanding | 5,740,000 | 5,740,000 |
Statements of Operations
Statements of Operations - USD ($) | 3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2015 | Dec. 31, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2015 | Dec. 31, 2014 | |
Statements Of Operations | ||||
Revenue from sales of properties | $ 8,900 | |||
Cost of revenue | 2,400 | |||
Gross margin | 6,500 | |||
Operating Expenses | ||||
Professional fees | $ 7,220 | $ 7,233 | $ 10,019 | 15,542 |
General and administrative | 800 | 550 | 3,297 | 2,328 |
Total operating expenses | 8,020 | 7,783 | 13,316 | 17,870 |
Loss from Operations | $ (8,020) | $ (7,783) | (13,316) | $ (11,370) |
Other (Income) Expense | ||||
Other income | $ (600) | |||
Interest Income | $ (96) | $ (96) | ||
Interest expense | $ 857 | 857 | $ 1,714 | 1,714 |
Other (income) expense, net | 857 | 761 | 1,114 | 1,618 |
Loss before Income Tax Provision | $ (8,877) | $ (8,544) | $ (14,430) | $ (12,988) |
Income Tax Provision | ||||
Net Loss | $ (8,877) | $ (8,544) | $ (14,430) | $ (12,988) |
Earnings per share | ||||
Basic and Diluted | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | ||||
Basic and Diluted | 5,740,000 | 5,740,000 | 5,740,000 | 5,740,000 |
Statement of Changes in Stockho
Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) - USD ($) | Common Stock | Additional Paid-In Capital | Accumulated Deficit | Total |
Beginning Balance, Shares at Jun. 30, 2014 | 5,740,000 | |||
Beginning Balance, Amount at Jun. 30, 2014 | $ 6 | $ 50,949 | $ (15,809) | $ 35,146 |
Expenses paid by president as contributed capital | 2,400 | 2,400 | ||
Net loss | $ (108,783) | (108,783) | ||
Ending Balance, Shares at Jun. 30, 2015 | 5,740,000 | |||
Ending Balance, Amount at Jun. 30, 2015 | $ 6 | $ 53,349 | (124,592) | (71,237) |
Net loss | (14,430) | (14,430) | ||
Ending Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2015 | 5,740,000 | |||
Ending Balance, Amount at Dec. 31, 2015 | $ 6 | $ 53,349 | $ (139,022) | $ (85,667) |
Statement of Cash Flows
Statement of Cash Flows - USD ($) | 6 Months Ended | |
Dec. 31, 2015 | Dec. 31, 2014 | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | ||
Net loss | $ (14,430) | $ (12,988) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | ||
Depreciation | 1,000 | 1,000 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||
Accrued expenses | 1,714 | 1,714 |
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities | $ (11,716) | (10,274) |
Cash Flows from Investing Activitites | ||
Collection of notes receivable | (3,586) | |
Deposit on acquisition of real estate | 5,000 | |
Purchase of real estate | (75,000) | |
Net cash used in investing activities | (73,586) | |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | ||
Proceeds from note payable - related party | $ 10,000 | 2,400 |
Proceeds from sales of stock for cash | 36,951 | |
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities | $ 10,000 | 39,351 |
Net Change in Cash | (1,715) | (44,509) |
Cash - beginning of reporting period | 7,275 | 78,474 |
Cash - end of reporting period | $ 5,560 | $ 33,965 |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | ||
Interest paid | ||
Income tax paid |
Organization and Operations
Organization and Operations | 6 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2015 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | |
Note 1 - Organization and Operations | First Priority Tax Solutions, Inc. (First Priority or the Company) was incorporated on March 31, 2014 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Company intends to engage in the business of acquiring, developing and managing residential and commercial income-producing properties in the Cincinnati and Dayton, Ohio metropolitan areas. Revenue will be generated primarily from rental income from the tenants occupying the properties acquired. |
Significant and Critical Accoun
Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices | 6 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2015 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | |
Note 2 - Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices | The Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Companys financial condition and results and require managements most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Companys significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles. Basis of Presentation Unaudited Interim Financial Information The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the reporting period ended June 30, 2015 and notes thereto contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on October 7, 2015. Fiscal Year End The Company elected June 30 th Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s). Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Companys critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were: (i) Assumption as a going concern: (ii) Fair value of long-lived assets: (iii) Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Fair Value of Financial Instrument and Fair Value Measurements The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Paragraph 820-10-35-37) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below: Level 1 Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Level 2 Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. Level 3 Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data. Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument. The carrying amounts of the Companys financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. The Companys note payable approximates the fair value of such instrument based upon managements best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangement at December 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015. Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arms-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arms-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated. Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The Company has adopted Section 360-10-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-17 an impairment loss shall be recognized only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). That assessment shall be based on the carrying amount of the asset (asset group) at the date it is tested for recoverability. An impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) exceeds its fair value. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-20 if an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of a long-lived asset shall be its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis shall be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. Restoration of a previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-21, the Companys long-lived asset (asset group) is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company considers the following to be some examples of such events or changes in circumstances that may trigger an impairment review: (a) significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset (asset group); (b) A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset (asset group) is being used or in its physical condition; (c) A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group), including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (d) An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset (asset group); (e) A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset (asset group); and (f) A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset (asset group) will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company tests its long-lived assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-35-29 through 35-36, Estimates of future cash flows used to test the recoverability of a long-lived asset (asset group) shall include only the future cash flows (cash inflows less associated cash outflows) that are directly associated with and that are expected to arise as a direct result of the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). Estimates of future cash flows used to test the recoverability of a long-lived asset (asset group) shall incorporate the entitys own assumptions about its use of the asset (asset group) and shall consider all available evidence. The assumptions used in developing those estimates shall be reasonable in relation to the assumptions used in developing other information used by the entity for comparable periods, such as internal budgets and projections, accruals related to incentive compensation plans, or information communicated to others. However, if alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) are under consideration or if a range is estimated for the amount of possible future cash flows associated with the likely course of action, the likelihood of those possible outcomes shall be considered. A probability-weighted approach may be useful in considering the likelihood of those possible outcomes. Estimates of future cash flows used to test the recoverability of a long-lived asset (asset group) shall be made for the remaining useful life of the asset (asset group) to the entity. For long-lived assets (asset groups) that have uncertainties both in timing and amount, an expected present value technique will often be the appropriate technique with which to estimate fair value. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-45-4 and 360-10-45-5, an impairment loss recognized for a long-lived asset (asset group) to be held and used shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amount of that loss. A gain or loss recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset (disposal group) that is not a component of an entity shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amounts of those gains or losses. Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Real Estate Real Estate is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows: Estimated Useful Life (Years) Building 30 Land N/A Upon sale or retirement, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the statements of operations. Related Parties The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions. Pursuant to Section 850-10-20, the related parties include a. affiliates (Affiliate means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act) of the Company; b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 8251015, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company and members of their immediate families; e. management of the Company and members of their immediate families; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 850-10-50-1 and 50-5,in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement. Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arms-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arms-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated. Commitment and Contingencies The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein. If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Companys financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed. Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Revenue Recognition The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company will recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured. In addition to the aforementioned general policy, the following are the specific revenue recognition policies for each major category of revenue: Residential property leases will be for terms of generally one year or less. Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Rent concessions, including free rent if incurred in connection with residential property leases, will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases (generally one year) and will be charged as a reduction of rental revenue. Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the current enacted tax rates and laws. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Section 740-10-25). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary. Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In managements opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary. Earnings per Share Earnings per share (EPS) are the amount of earnings attributable to each share of common stock. For convenience, the term is used to refer to either earnings or loss per share. EPS is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-10 through 260-10-45-16 Basic EPS shall be computed by dividing income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Income available to common stockholders shall be computed by deducting both the dividends declared in the period on preferred stock (whether or not paid) and the dividends accumulated for the period on cumulative preferred stock (whether or not earned) from income from continuing operations (if that amount appears in the income statement) and also from net income. The computation of diluted EPS is similar to the computation of basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-45-21 through 260-10-45-45-23, Diluted EPS shall be based on the most advantageous conversion rate or exercise price from the standpoint of the security holder. The dilutive effect of outstanding call options and warrants (and their equivalents) issued by the reporting entity shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method. Equivalents of options and warrants include non-vested stock granted to employees, stock purchase contracts, and partially paid stock subscriptions. Under the treasury stock method: a. Exercise of options and warrants shall be assumed at the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later) and common shares shall be assumed to be issued. b. The proceeds from exercise shall be assumed to be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. c. The incremental shares (the difference between the number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) shall be included in the denominator of the diluted EPS computation. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-40 through 45-42, convertible securities shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application of the if converted method. There were no potentially dilutive common shares outstanding for the reporting period ended December 31, 2015 or 2014. Cash Flows Reporting The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (Indirect method) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Subsequent Events The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (ASU 2014-09) This guidance amends the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification, creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: 1. Identify the contract(s) with the customer 2. Identify the performance obligations in the contract 3. Determine the transaction price 4. Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract 5. Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligations The ASU also provides guidance on disclosures that should be provided to enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue recognition and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about the following: 1. Contracts with customers 2. Significant judgments and changes in judgments 3. Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. In August 2015, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-14 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Deferral of the Effective Date (ASU 2015-14). The amendments in this Update defer the effective date of Update 2014-09 for all entities by one year. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in Update 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. In August 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 Presentation of Financial StatementsGoing Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entitys Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (ASU 2014-15). In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entitys management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued financial statements are available to be issued financial statements are issued financial statements are available to be issued probable When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entitys ability to continue as a going concern, management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of managements plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entitys ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of managements plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following (or refer to similar information disclosed elsewhere in the footnotes): a. Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of managements plans) b. Managements evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entitys ability to meet its obligations c. Managements plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entitys ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of managements plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there is substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern a. Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern b. Managements evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entitys ability to meet its obligations c. Managements plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. In November 2015, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-17 Income Taxes (Topic 740) Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (ASU 2015-17). For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. In January 2016, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-01 Financial InstrumentsOverall (Subtopic 825-10) Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (ASU 2016-01). This Updatemakes limited amendments to the guidance in U.S. GAAP on the classification and measurement of financial instruments. The new standard significantly revises an entitys accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. It also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. Some of the major changes as a result of the ASU 2016-01 are summarized below. · Requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. · Simplify the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment. When a qualitative assessment indicates that impairment exists, an entity is required to measure the investment at fair value. · Eliminate the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. · Require public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes. · Require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. · Require separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance |
Going Concern
Going Concern | 6 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2015 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | |
Note 3 - Going Concern | The Company has elected to adopt early application of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial StatementsGoing Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entitys Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (ASU 2014-15) The Companys financial statements have been prepared assuming that it will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. As reflected in the financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2015, a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the reporting period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. The Company is attempting to commence operations and generate sufficient revenue; however, the Companys cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to commence operations and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering. The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. |
Real Estate
Real Estate | 6 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2015 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | |
Note 4 - Real Estate | As of December 31, 2015, real estate investment consisted of one commercial property located at 1784 Stanley Avenue, Dayton, Ohio, which is not yet rented. Depreciation expense for the six months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 totaled $1,000 and $1,000, respectively. |
Notes Receivable
Notes Receivable | 6 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2015 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | |
Note 5 - Notes Receivable | On July 10, 2014, the Company sold property located at 1029 Valley St, Dayton, Ohio to a third party and received a promissory note in the amount of $4,400. The Company accreted interest at 5% per annum on the note ($77). The note requires monthly payments of $400 commencing on September 1, 2014. This note has been collected on June 17, 2015. On August 21, 2014, the Company sold property located at 1061 Gerhard St, Dayton, Ohio to a third party and received a promissory note in the amount of $4,500. The Company accreted interest at 5% per annum on the note ($60). The note requires monthly payments of $500 commencing on October 1, 2014. The note has been collected on March 11, 2015. |
Note Payable
Note Payable | 6 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2015 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | |
Note 6 - Note Payable | On June 1, 2014, the Company entered into a note payable with a third-party in the amount of $85,000. The note bears interest at 4% per annum with interest and principal due on June 1, 2016. Accrued interest totaled $5,393 and $1,993 for the reporting period ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. |
Stockholders' (Deficit)
Stockholders' (Deficit) | 6 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2015 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | |
Note 7 - Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) | Shares Authorized Upon formation, the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue is Ninety Two Million (92,000,000) shares of Common Stock, par value $0.000001 per share, and Eight Million (8,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.000001 per share. Common Stock On March 31, 2014, upon formation, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,000,000 shares of the newly formed corporations common stock to its Chief Executive Officer at the par value of $0.000001 per share or $4 for compensation. From March 31, 2014 through June 30, 2014, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,740,000 shares of its common stock for cash at $0.02 per share for a total of $36,951. Contributed Capital In June 2014, the Companys president paid $14,000 in legal expenses for the Company which has been treated as a contribution to capital. In July 2014, the Companys president contributed two properties in Dayton, Ohio. Both properties were recognized at no cost to the Company. The president also paid for repairs and maintenance on these properties totaling $2,400. The amount has been recorded as a contribution to capital. On September 30, 2014, the Companys president paid repair and cleaning costs associated with the Companys properties, totaling $2,400. This amount has been shown as a contribution to capital. |
Related Party Transactions
Related Party Transactions | 6 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2015 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | |
Note 8 - Related Party Transactions | Note Payable - Related Party On October 19, 2015, the Company entered into a note payable with a related party in the amount of $10,000. The note bears no interest, and principal is due on October 19, 2017. |
Concentration
Concentration | 6 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2015 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | |
Note 9 - Concentration | The Company operates in the real estate industry and owns one property in Dayton, Ohio. In July and August 2014, the Company sold two properties, located in Dayton, Ohio for $8,900. |
Subsequent Events
Subsequent Events | 6 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2015 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | |
Note 10 - Subsequent Events | The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent events to be disclosed. |
Significant and Critical Acco17
Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Policies) | 6 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2015 | |
Significant And Critical Accounting Policies And Practices Policies | |
Basis of Presentation Unaudited Interim Financial Information | The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the reporting period ended June 30, 2015 and notes thereto contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on October 7, 2015. |
Fiscal Year End | The Company elected June 30 th |
Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions | The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s). Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Companys critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were: (i) Assumption as a going concern: (ii) Fair value of long-lived assets: (iii) Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
Fair Value of Financial Instrument and Fair Value Measurements | The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Paragraph 820-10-35-37) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below: Level 1 Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Level 2 Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. Level 3 Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data. Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument. The carrying amounts of the Companys financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. The Companys note payable approximates the fair value of such instrument based upon managements best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangement at December 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015. Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arms-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arms-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated. |
Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets | The Company has adopted Section 360-10-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-17 an impairment loss shall be recognized only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). That assessment shall be based on the carrying amount of the asset (asset group) at the date it is tested for recoverability. An impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) exceeds its fair value. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-20 if an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of a long-lived asset shall be its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis shall be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. Restoration of a previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-21, the Companys long-lived asset (asset group) is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company considers the following to be some examples of such events or changes in circumstances that may trigger an impairment review: (a) significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset (asset group); (b) A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset (asset group) is being used or in its physical condition; (c) A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group), including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (d) An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset (asset group); (e) A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset (asset group); and (f) A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset (asset group) will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company tests its long-lived assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-35-29 through 35-36, Estimates of future cash flows used to test the recoverability of a long-lived asset (asset group) shall include only the future cash flows (cash inflows less associated cash outflows) that are directly associated with and that are expected to arise as a direct result of the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). Estimates of future cash flows used to test the recoverability of a long-lived asset (asset group) shall incorporate the entitys own assumptions about its use of the asset (asset group) and shall consider all available evidence. The assumptions used in developing those estimates shall be reasonable in relation to the assumptions used in developing other information used by the entity for comparable periods, such as internal budgets and projections, accruals related to incentive compensation plans, or information communicated to others. However, if alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) are under consideration or if a range is estimated for the amount of possible future cash flows associated with the likely course of action, the likelihood of those possible outcomes shall be considered. A probability-weighted approach may be useful in considering the likelihood of those possible outcomes. Estimates of future cash flows used to test the recoverability of a long-lived asset (asset group) shall be made for the remaining useful life of the asset (asset group) to the entity. For long-lived assets (asset groups) that have uncertainties both in timing and amount, an expected present value technique will often be the appropriate technique with which to estimate fair value. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-45-4 and 360-10-45-5, an impairment loss recognized for a long-lived asset (asset group) to be held and used shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amount of that loss. A gain or loss recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset (disposal group) that is not a component of an entity shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amounts of those gains or losses. |
Cash Equivalents | The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. |
Real Estate | Real Estate is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows: Estimated Useful Life (Years) Building 30 Land N/A Upon sale or retirement, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the statements of operations. |
Related Parties | The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions. Pursuant to Section 850-10-20, the related parties include a. affiliates (Affiliate means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act) of the Company; b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 8251015, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company and members of their immediate families; e. management of the Company and members of their immediate families; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 850-10-50-1 and 50-5,in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement. Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arms-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arms-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated. |
Commitment and Contingencies | The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein. If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Companys financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed. Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. |
Revenue Recognition | The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company will recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured. In addition to the aforementioned general policy, the following are the specific revenue recognition policies for each major category of revenue: Residential property leases will be for terms of generally one year or less. Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Rent concessions, including free rent if incurred in connection with residential property leases, will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases (generally one year) and will be charged as a reduction of rental revenue. |
Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision | The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the current enacted tax rates and laws. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Section 740-10-25). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary. Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In managements opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary. |
Earnings per Share | Earnings per share (EPS) are the amount of earnings attributable to each share of common stock. For convenience, the term is used to refer to either earnings or loss per share. EPS is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-10 through 260-10-45-16 Basic EPS shall be computed by dividing income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Income available to common stockholders shall be computed by deducting both the dividends declared in the period on preferred stock (whether or not paid) and the dividends accumulated for the period on cumulative preferred stock (whether or not earned) from income from continuing operations (if that amount appears in the income statement) and also from net income. The computation of diluted EPS is similar to the computation of basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-45-21 through 260-10-45-45-23, Diluted EPS shall be based on the most advantageous conversion rate or exercise price from the standpoint of the security holder. The dilutive effect of outstanding call options and warrants (and their equivalents) issued by the reporting entity shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method. Equivalents of options and warrants include non-vested stock granted to employees, stock purchase contracts, and partially paid stock subscriptions. Under the treasury stock method: a. Exercise of options and warrants shall be assumed at the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later) and common shares shall be assumed to be issued. b. The proceeds from exercise shall be assumed to be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. c. The incremental shares (the difference between the number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) shall be included in the denominator of the diluted EPS computation. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-40 through 45-42, convertible securities shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application of the if converted method. There were no potentially dilutive common shares outstanding for the reporting period ended December 31, 2015 or 2014. |
Cash Flows Reporting | The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (Indirect method) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. |
Subsequent Events | The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR. |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements | In May 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (ASU 2014-09) This guidance amends the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification, creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: 1. Identify the contract(s) with the customer 2. Identify the performance obligations in the contract 3. Determine the transaction price 4. Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract 5. Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligations The ASU also provides guidance on disclosures that should be provided to enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue recognition and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about the following: 1. Contracts with customers 2. Significant judgments and changes in judgments 3. Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. In August 2015, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-14 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Deferral of the Effective Date (ASU 2015-14). The amendments in this Update defer the effective date of Update 2014-09 for all entities by one year. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in Update 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. In August 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 Presentation of Financial StatementsGoing Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entitys Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (ASU 2014-15). In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entitys management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued financial statements are available to be issued financial statements are issued financial statements are available to be issued probable When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entitys ability to continue as a going concern, management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of managements plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entitys ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of managements plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following (or refer to similar information disclosed elsewhere in the footnotes): a. Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of managements plans) b. Managements evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entitys ability to meet its obligations c. Managements plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entitys ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of managements plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there is substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern a. Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern b. Managements evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entitys ability to meet its obligations c. Managements plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. In November 2015, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-17 Income Taxes (Topic 740) Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (ASU 2015-17). For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. In January 2016, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-01 Financial InstrumentsOverall (Subtopic 825-10) Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (ASU 2016-01). This Updatemakes limited amendments to the guidance in U.S. GAAP on the classification and measurement of financial instruments. The new standard significantly revises an entitys accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. It also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. Some of the major changes as a result of the ASU 2016-01 are summarized below. · Requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. · Simplify the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment. When a qualitative assessment indicates that impairment exists, an entity is required to measure the investment at fair value. · Eliminate the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. · Require public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes. · Require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. · Require separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. · Clarify that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entitys other deferred tax assets. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, when adopted, will have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements. |
Significant and Critical Acco18
Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Tables) | 6 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2015 | |
Significant And Critical Accounting Policies And Practices Tables | |
Real Estate | Estimated Useful Life (Years) Building 30 Land N/A |
Significant and Critical Acco19
Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Details) | 6 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2015 | |
Building [Member] | |
Estimated Useful Life (Years) | 30 years |
Real Estate (Details Narrative)
Real Estate (Details Narrative) - USD ($) | 6 Months Ended | |
Dec. 31, 2015 | Dec. 31, 2014 | |
Real Estate Details Narrative | ||
Depreciation expense | $ 1,000 | $ 1,000 |
Note Payable (Details Narrative
Note Payable (Details Narrative) - USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2015 | Dec. 31, 2014 |
Note Payable Details Narrative | ||
Accrued interest | $ 5,393 | $ 1,993 |
Stockholders' (Deficit) (Detail
Stockholders' (Deficit) (Details Narrative) - $ / shares | Dec. 31, 2015 | Jun. 30, 2015 |
Stockholders Deficit Details Narrative | ||
Preferred stock, par value | $ 0.000001 | $ 0.000001 |
Preferred stock, shares authorized | 8,000,000 | 8,000,000 |
Common stock, par value | $ 0.000001 | $ 0.000001 |
Common stock, shares authorized | 92,000,000 | 92,000,000 |