Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation In the opinion of the Company’s management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (“Financial Statements”) have been prepared on a consistent basis with the Company’s December 31, 2015 audited consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly state the information set forth herein. The Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and, as permitted by such rules and regulations, omit certain information and footnote disclosures necessary to present the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). These Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2015 included in the Registration Statement. The results of operations for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year or any future periods. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements. Estimates include, but are not limited to, the valuation of cash equivalents and investments, the valuation and recognition of share-based compensation, the useful lives assigned to long-lived assets and the computation provisions for income taxes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. Significant Accounting Policies There have been no material changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies during the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the significant accounting policies described in the Registration Statement. The policies described below are not changes but are accounting policies adopted as they became applicable to the Company. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The following table sets forth the fair value of the Company’s financial assets measured on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively (in thousands): June 30, 2016 December 31, 2015 Assets Classification Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Money market funds Cash and cash equivalents $ 20,006 $ — $ — $ 20,006 $ — $ — $ — $ — Commercial paper Investments — 495 — 495 — — — — Total assets measured at fair value $ 20,006 $ 495 $ — $ 20,501 $ — $ — $ — $ — The Company did not have any financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015. The Company classifies its investments in money market funds within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using bank balances or quoted market prices. The Company classifies its Level 2 instruments based on market pricing and other observable inputs. The Company did not classify any of its investments within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, there were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 assets or liabilities reported at fair value on a recurring basis and the valuation techniques used did not change compared to the Company’s established practice. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Investments The Company has designated all investments as available-for-sale and therefore, such investments are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) in stockholders’ equity. The cost of marketable securities is adjusted for the amortization of premiums and discounts to expected maturity. Premium and discount amortization is included in other income, net. Realized gains and losses, as well as interest income, on available-for-sale securities are also included in other income, net. Unrealized gain at June 30, 2016 was immaterial. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. The Company includes all of its available-for-sale securities in current assets. All of the Company’s investments are subject to a periodic impairment review. The Company recognizes an impairment charge when a decline in the fair value of its investments below the cost basis is judged to be other-than-temporary. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include the length of time and extent to which the investments fair value has been less than the cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, extent of the loss related to credit of the issuer, the expected cash flows from the security, the Company’s intent to sell the security and whether or not the Company will be required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, the Company did not recognize any impairment charges on its investments as it is more likely than not that the Company will recover their amortized cost basis upon sale or maturity. The Company did not hold investment securities at any time during the prior year. Recent Accounting Pronouncements During May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This updated standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. In August 2015, the FASB issued an update to defer the effective date of this update by one year. This updated standard becomes effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal year 2018, but allows the Company to adopt the standard one year earlier if it so chooses. In March 2016, the FASB issued updates to this guidance to clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. In April 2016, the FASB issued guidance to clarify aspects related to identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance. The Company has not yet selected a transition method and is evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its Financial Statements and related disclosures. During February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which amends the existing accounting standards for leases. The new standard requires lessees to record a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability on the balance sheet (with the exception of short-term leases). For lessees, leases will continue to be classified as either operating or financing in the income statement. This ASU becomes effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 and early adoption is permitted. This ASU is required to be applied with a modified retrospective approach and requires application of the new standard at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. The Company generally does not finance purchases of equipment or other capital, but does lease its facilities. The Company is evaluating the effect that this ASU will have on its Financial Statements and related disclosures. During March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-based Payment Accounting. This ASU simplifies the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. This ASU requires that excess tax benefits and deficiencies be recognized as income tax benefit or expense in the income statement. The Company currently plans to implement this ASU as required in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. The Company is evaluating the effect that this ASU will have on its Financial Statements and related disclosures. During June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments , which requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held. ASU 2016-13 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020 and the Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2016-13 will have on its consolidated financial statements. Net Loss per Share The following outstanding common stock options and warrants to purchase common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share for the periods presented because including them would have had an anti-dilutive effect: Six-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2016 2015 Common stock warrants 874,610 299,625 Common stock options 1,020,568 390,883 Total 1,895,178 690,508 |