ARES INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST (ARIR) 10-K 2020 FY Annual report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

☒	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020
	OR
☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 000-56032

Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland	47-1592886
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
518 Seventeenth Street, 17th Floor, Denver, CO	80202
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

(303) 228-2200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value

(Title of each class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  ☐   No  ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐   No  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  ☒   No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes  ☒   No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☒
Non-accelerated filer	☒			Emerging growth company	☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes  ☐    No  ☒

The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2020 cannot be calculated because no established market exists for the registrant’s common stock.

As of March 1, 2021, there were 138,845,767 shares of the registrant’s Class T common stock, 8,977,107 shares of the registrant’s Class W common stock and 4,000,429 shares of the registrant’s Class I common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporates certain information by reference to the definitive proxy statement for the registrant’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) no later than April 30, 2021.

BLACK CREEK INDUSTRIAL REIT IV INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	PART I
Item 1.	Business	1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	5
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	51
Item 2.	Properties	52
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	56
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	56
	PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	57
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	65
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	66
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	82
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	84
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	120
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	120
Item 9B.	Other Information	120
	PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	121
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	121
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	121
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	121
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	121
	PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	122
Item 16.	Summary of Form 10-K	127

i

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes certain statements that may be deemed forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such forward-looking statements relate to, without limitation, our ability to raise capital and effectively and timely deploy the net proceeds from our public offerings, the expected use of net proceeds from our public offerings, our reliance on BCI IV Advisors LLC (the “Advisor”) and BCI IV Advisors Group LLC (the “Sponsor”), our understanding of our competition and our ability to compete effectively, our financing needs, our expected leverage, the effects of our current strategies, rent and occupancy growth, general conditions in the geographic area where we will operate, our future debt and financial position, our future capital expenditures, future distributions and acquisitions (including the amount and nature thereof), other developments and trends of the real estate industry, investment strategies and the expansion and growth of our operations. Forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by the use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “could,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “project,” or the negative of these words or other comparable terminology. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict.

The forward-looking statements included herein are based upon our current expectations, plans, estimates, assumptions, and beliefs that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, present and future economic, competitive and market conditions, and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, our actual results and performance could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to:

● Our ability to raise capital and effectively deploy the net proceeds raised in our public offerings in accordance with our investment strategy and objectives;

● The failure of properties to perform as we expect;

● Risks associated with acquisitions, dispositions and development of properties;

● Our failure to successfully integrate acquired properties and operations;

● Unexpected delays or increased costs associated with any development projects;

● The availability of cash flows from operating activities for distributions and capital expenditures;

● Defaults on or non-renewal of leases by customers, lease renewals at lower than expected rent, or failure to lease properties at all or on favorable rents and terms;

● Difficulties in economic conditions generally and the real estate, debt, and securities markets specifically, including those related to the COVID-19 pandemic;

● Legislative or regulatory changes, including changes to the laws governing the taxation of real estate investment trusts (“REITs”);

● Our failure to obtain, renew, or extend necessary financing or access the debt or equity markets;

● Conflicts of interest arising out of our relationships with the Sponsor, the Advisor, and their affiliates;

● Risks associated with using debt to fund our business activities, including re-financing and interest rate risks;

● Increases in interest rates, operating costs, or greater than expected capital expenditures;

● Changes to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”); and

ii

● Our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT.

Any of the assumptions underlying forward-looking statements could prove to be inaccurate. Our stockholders are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. All forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the risk that actual results will differ materially from the expectations expressed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K will increase with the passage of time. Except as otherwise required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances, or any other reason. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including, without limitation, the risks described under “Risk Factors,” the inclusion of such forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the objectives and plans set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K will be achieved.

Summary Risk Factors

An investment in shares of our common stock involves significant risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 4. These risks include, among others:

● There is no assurance that we will be able to achieve our investment objectives. We have experienced net loss, as defined by GAAP.

● There is no public trading market for shares of our common stock, and we do not anticipate that there will be a public trading market for our shares, so redemption of shares by us will likely be the only way to dispose of our stockholders’ shares. Our share redemption program will provide our stockholders with the opportunity to request that we redeem their shares on a monthly basis, but we are not obligated to redeem any shares and may choose to redeem only some, or even none, of the shares that have been requested to be redeemed in any particular month, in our discretion. In addition, redemptions will be subject to available liquidity and other significant restrictions. Further, our board of directors may modify, suspend or terminate our share redemption program if it deems such action to be in our best interest and the best interest of our stockholders. As a result, our shares should be considered as having only limited liquidity and at times may be illiquid, therefore, our stockholders must be prepared to hold their shares for an indefinite length of time.

● A portion of the proceeds received in this offering is expected to be used to satisfy redemption requests. Using the proceeds from this offering for redemptions will reduce the net proceeds available to retire debt or acquire additional properties, which may result in reduced liquidity and profitability or restrict our ability to grow our NAV.

● The transaction price may not accurately represent the value of our assets at any given time and the actual value of our stockholders’ investments may be substantially less. The transaction price generally will be based on our most recently disclosed monthly NAV of each class of common stock (subject to material changes) and will not be based on any public trading market. Further, our board of directors may amend our NAV procedures from time to time. For example, if our stockholders wish to subscribe for shares of our common stock in October, their subscription request must be received in good order at least five business days before November 1. Generally, the offering price per share would equal the transaction price of the applicable class as of the last calendar day of September, plus applicable upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees. If accepted, their subscription would be effective on the first calendar day of November. Conversely, if our stockholders wish to submit their shares for redemption in October, their redemption request and required documentation must be received in good order by 4:00 p.m. (Eastern time) on the second to last business day of October. If accepted, their shares would be redeemed as of the last calendar day of October and, generally, the redemption price would equal the transaction price of the applicable class as of the last calendar day of September. Shares are subject to a 5.0% early redemption discount if they have been outstanding for less than one year. In each of these cases, the NAV that is ultimately determined as of the last day of October may be higher or lower than the NAV as of the last day of September used for determining the transaction price. Therefore, the price at which our stockholders purchase shares may be higher than the current NAV per share at the time of sale and the price at which our stockholders redeem shares may be lower than the current NAV per share at the time of redemption.

● The transaction price may not represent our enterprise value and may not accurately reflect the actual prices at which our assets could be liquidated on any given day, the value a third party would pay for all or substantially all of our shares, or the

iii

price that our shares would trade at on a national stock exchange. Further, it is possible that the annual appraisals of our properties may not be spread evenly throughout the year, and rapidly changing market conditions or material events may not be fully reflected in our monthly NAV. The resulting potential disparity in our NAV may inure to the benefit of redeeming stockholders or non-redeeming stockholders and new purchasers of our common stock, depending on whether our published NAV per share for such class is overstated or understated.

● In connection with this offering, we incur fees and expenses which will decrease the amount of cash we have available for operations and new investments. In the future we may conduct other offerings of common stock (whether existing or new classes), preferred stock, debt securities or of interests in our Operating Partnership. We may also amend the terms of this offering. We may structure or amend such offerings to attract institutional investors or other sources of capital. The costs of this offering and future offerings may negatively impact our ability to pay distributions and our stockholders overall return.

● Our NAV per share may suddenly change if the valuations of our properties materially change from prior valuations or the actual operating results materially differ from what we originally budgeted. For example, we expect to face lease expirations across our portfolio regularly, and as we move further away from lease commencement toward the end of a lease term, the valuation of the underlying property generally will be expected to drop, depending on the likelihood of a renewal or a new lease on similar terms.

● Some of our executive officers, directors and other key personnel are also officers, directors, managers, key personnel and/or holders of an ownership interest in the Advisor, the Dealer Manager, and/or other entities related to the Sponsor. As a result, they face conflicts of interest, including but not limited to conflicts arising from time constraints, allocation of investment and leasing opportunities and the fact that certain of the compensation the Advisor will receive for services rendered to us is based on our NAV, the procedures for which the Advisor assists our board of directors in developing, overseeing, implementing and coordinating. We expect to compete with certain affiliates of direct and indirect owners of the Sponsor for investments and certain of those entities may be given priority with respect to certain investment opportunities.

● This is a “blind pool” offering; our stockholders will not have the opportunity to evaluate all of the investments we will make before we make them.

● This is a “best efforts” offering and if we are unable to raise substantial funds, then we will be more limited in our investments.

● We may change our investment policies without stockholder notice or consent, which could result in investments that are different from those described in this report and in other filings we make with the SEC from time to time.

● The amount of distributions we may make is uncertain. Distributions have been and may continue to be paid from sources other than cash flows from operating activities, including, without limitation, from borrowings, the sale of assets or offering proceeds. Our distributions may exceed our taxable income, which would represent a return of capital for tax purposes. A return of capital is a return of our stockholders investment rather than a return of earnings or gains and will be made after deductions of fees and expenses payable in connection with our offering. Some or all of our future distributions may be paid from these sources as well as from the sales of assets, cash resulting from a waiver or deferral of fees, and from our cash balances. There is no limit on distributions that may be made from these sources, however, our Advisor and its affiliates are under no obligation to defer or waive fees in order to support our distributions. The use of these sources for distributions may decrease the amount of cash we have available for new investments, share redemptions and other corporate purposes, and could reduce our stockholders overall return.

● If we fail to qualify as a REIT, it would adversely affect our operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

● Our use of leverage, such as mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, increases the risk of loss on our investments.

iv

PART I

ITEM 1.        BUSINESS

The Company

Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc. is a Maryland corporation formed on August 12, 2014. As used herein, the terms “Black Creek Industrial REIT IV,” “BCI IV,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us” refer to Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, except where otherwise indicated.

We were formed to make equity and debt investments in income-producing real estate assets consisting primarily of high-quality distribution warehouses and other industrial properties that are leased to creditworthy corporate customers throughout the U.S. Although we will continue to focus our investment activities primarily on distribution warehouses and other industrial properties, our charter and bylaws do not preclude us from investing in other types of commercial property, real estate debt, or real estate related equity securities.

We have operated and elected to be treated as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2017, and we intend to continue to operate in accordance with the requirements for qualification as a REIT. We utilize an Umbrella Partnership Real Estate Investment Trust (“UPREIT”) organizational structure to hold all or substantially all of our assets through our operating partnership, BCI IV Operating Partnership LP (the “Operating Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership of which we are the sole general partner and a limited partner.

On February 18, 2016, the SEC declared our registration statement for our initial public offering of up to $2.0 billion of shares of our common stock effective. On September 5, 2019, our initial public offering was terminated immediately upon effectiveness of our registration statement for our follow-on public offering of up to $2.0 billion of shares of our common stock, and our follow-on public offering commenced the same day. Under our follow-on public offering, we are offering up to $1.5 billion of shares of our common stock in the primary offering and up to $500.0 million of shares of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, in any combination of Class T shares, Class W shares and Class I shares. We intend to conduct a continuous offering that will not have a predetermined duration, subject to continued compliance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and applicable state laws.

Pursuant to our public offering, we offered and continue to offer shares of our common stock at the “transaction price,” plus applicable selling commissions and dealer manager fees. The “transaction price” generally is equal to the net asset value (“NAV”) per share of our common stock most recently disclosed. Our NAV per share is calculated as of the last calendar day of each month for each of our outstanding classes of common stock, and is available generally within 15 calendar days after the end of the applicable month. Shares issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan are offered at the transaction price, as indicated above, in effect on the distribution date. We may update a previously disclosed transaction price in cases where we believe there has been a material change (positive or negative) to our NAV per share relative to the most recently disclosed monthly NAV per share. See Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities—Estimated Net Asset Value Per Share” for further detail.

Additionally, we intend to initiate a program to raise capital through private placement offerings by selling beneficial interests in specific Delaware statutory trusts holding real properties (the “DST Program”). These private placements will be exempt from registration requirements pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. We anticipate that these interests may serve as replacement properties for investors seeking to complete like-kind exchange transactions under Section 1031 of the Code. Similar to our prior private placement offerings, we expect that the DST Program will give us the opportunity to expand and diversify our capital raise strategies by offering what we believe to be an attractive and unique investment product for investors that may be seeking replacement properties to complete like-kind exchange transactions.

As of December 31, 2020, we had raised gross proceeds of approximately $1.5 billion from the sale of 141.9 million shares of our common stock, including shares issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. See “Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for information concerning our public offerings.

On July 15, 2020, we acquired minority ownership interests in two joint venture partnerships, which include Build-To-Core Industrial Partnership I LP (the “BTC I Partnership”) and Build-To-Core Industrial Partnership II LP (the “BTC II Partnership” and, together with the BTC I Partnership, the “BTC Partnerships”), with third party investors for $301.0 million in cash paid at closing, exclusive of due

1

diligence expenses and other closing costs. As of the date of acquisition, the joint venture partnerships’ aggregate real estate portfolios consisted of 64 acquired or completed buildings and 18 buildings under construction or in the pre-construction phase.

As of December 31, 2020, we owned and managed, either directly or through our minority ownership interests in our joint venture partnerships (which are presented as if we own a 100% interest), a total real estate portfolio that included 132 industrial buildings totaling 30.3 million square feet located in 23 markets throughout the U.S., with 205 customers, and was 84.9% occupied (87.8% leased) with a weighted-average remaining lease term (based on square feet) of approximately 4.7 years. The occupied rate reflects the square footage with a paying customer in place. The leased rate includes the occupied square footage and additional square footage with leases in place that have not yet commenced. As of December 31, 2020, our total real estate portfolio included:

● 121 industrial buildings totaling approximately 28.2 million square feet comprised our operating portfolio, which includes stabilized properties, and was 91.0% occupied (94.2% leased) with a weighted-average remaining lease term (based on square feet) of approximately 4.7 years; and

● 11 industrial buildings totaling approximately 2.1 million square feet comprised our value-add portfolio, which includes buildings acquired with the intention to reposition or redevelop, or buildings recently completed which have not yet reached stabilization. We generally consider a building to be stabilized on the earlier to occur of the first anniversary of a building’s shell completion or a building achieving 90% occupancy.

See Item 2, “Properties,” for further details on our real estate portfolio. See “Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for detail regarding our acquisition activity for the year ended December 31, 2020.

We rely on the Advisor, a related party, to manage our day-to-day operating and acquisition activities and to implement our investment strategy pursuant to the terms of the amended and restated advisory agreement (2021), dated February 16, 2021 (the “Advisory Agreement”), by and among us, the Operating Partnership, and the Advisor. The current term of the Advisory Agreement ends June 12, 2021, subject to renewal by our board of directors for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods. The Advisor performs its duties and responsibilities under the Advisory Agreement as a fiduciary of us and our stockholders. The Advisor may, but is not required to, establish working capital reserves from proceeds from our public offerings, from cash flow generated by operating assets or from proceeds from the sale of assets. Working capital reserves are typically utilized to fund tenant improvements, leasing commissions, and major capital expenditures. Our lenders also may require working capital reserves.

Investment Objectives

Our primary investment objectives include the following:

● preserving and protecting our stockholders’ capital contributions;

● providing current income to our stockholders in the form of regular distributions; and

● realizing capital appreciation upon the potential sale of our assets or other liquidity event.

There is no assurance that we will attain our investment objectives. Our charter places numerous limitations on us with respect to the manner in which we may invest our funds. In most cases these limitations cannot be changed unless our charter is amended, which may require the approval of our stockholders.

Investment Strategy

We have and will continue to focus our investment activities on and use the proceeds raised in the offerings principally for building a national industrial warehouse operating company. Our investment activities include the acquisition, development and/or financing of income-producing real estate assets consisting primarily of high-quality distribution warehouses and other industrial properties that are leased to creditworthy corporate customers. Creditworthiness does not necessarily mean investment grade and the majority of our customers do not have a public credit rating. Furthermore, it is anticipated that much of our portfolio will be leased to non-investment grade customers going forward. We evaluate creditworthiness and financial strength of prospective customers based on financial, operating

2

and business plan information that is provided to us by such prospective customers, as well as other market and economic information that is generally publicly available.

The number and type of properties we may acquire or develop will depend upon real estate market conditions and other circumstances existing at the time we make our investments. Although we intend to continue to focus our investment activities primarily on distribution warehouses and other industrial properties, our charter and bylaws do not preclude us from investing in other types of commercial property or real estate-related debt. However, we will not invest more than 25% of net proceeds we receive from the sale of shares of our common stock in the offerings in other types of commercial property or real estate-related debt. As of December 31, 2020, our portfolio was comprised entirely of industrial properties. See Item 2, “Properties,” for further detail.

Our investment in any distribution warehouse, other industrial property, or other property type will be based upon the best interests of our company and our stockholders as determined by the Advisor and our board of directors. Real estate assets in which we may invest may be acquired or developed either directly by us or through joint venture partnerships or other co-ownership arrangements with affiliated or unaffiliated third parties, and may include: equity investments in commercial properties; mortgage, mezzanine, construction, bridge, and other loans related to real estate; and investments in other real estate-related entities, including REITs, private real estate funds, real estate management companies, real estate development companies, and debt funds, both foreign and domestic. Subject to the 25% limitation described above, we may invest in any of these asset classes, including those that may present greater risk than industrial properties. The BTC I Partnership invests in an industrial real estate portfolio targeted to be comprised of approximately (i) 80.0% development investments, and (ii) 20.0% core and value-add investments, and the BTC II Partnership invests in an industrial real estate portfolio targeted to be comprised of approximately (i) 70.0% development investments, and (ii) 30.0% core and value-add investments.

Business Strategy

We seek to provide income in the form of regular distributions to our stockholders by generating sustained internal growth in rental income. The keys to long-term rental income growth are maintaining a stabilized occupancy rate (generally above 90%) through active leasing efforts, negotiating contractual rent increases on existing leases and renewals on expiring leases, cultivating strong customer relationships, and controlling operating expenses.

Financing Objectives

We use secured and unsecured debt as a means of providing additional funds for the acquisition of assets, to pay distributions, and for other corporate purposes. While a large percentage of our debt financings may typically be comprised of long-term, fixed-rate loans, our use of leverage generally increases the risk of default on loan payments and the resulting foreclosure on a particular asset or group of assets. Upon a default, our lenders may also have recourse to assets other than those specifically securing the repayment of the indebtedness. Our ability to enhance our investment returns and to increase our diversification by acquiring assets using additional funds provided through borrowings could be adversely impacted if the credit markets are closed or limited and banks and other lending institutions impose severe restrictions on the amount of funds available for the types of loans we seek. We have sourced, and may continue to source, institutional or other capital through joint venture partnerships or other co-partnerships to help diversify risk associated with development and value-add opportunities. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Debt Financing” for further detail.

Competition

The market for the acquisition of industrial real estate is highly competitive. We compete for real property investments with other REITs and institutional investors, such as pension funds and their advisors, private real estate investment funds, insurance company investment accounts, private investment companies, individuals and other entities engaged in real estate investment activities, including certain other entities sponsored or advised by affiliates of the Sponsor, including Black Creek Diversified Property Fund Inc. (“DPF”), Black Creek Industrial Fund LP (“BCIF”) and Build-To-Core Industrial Partnership III LLC (“BTC III”), some of which have greater financial resources than we do and generally may be able to accept more risk, including risks relating to the creditworthiness of potential customers, the breadth of the markets in which to invest, or the level of leverage they are willing to take on. They also may possess significant competitive advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital or greater operating efficiencies associated with a larger platform.

3

The market for the leasing of industrial real estate is also very competitive. We experience competition for customers from other existing assets in proximity to our buildings, as well as from proposed new developments. As a result, we may have to provide free rental periods, incur charges for tenant improvements, or offer other inducements, all of which may have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

Significant Customers

We are dependent upon the ability of current customers to pay their contractual rent amounts as the rents become due. As of December 31, 2020, there was one customer that individually represented more than 5.0% of total annualized base rent (assuming 100% ownership of our unconsolidated properties), and our 10 largest customers represented approximately 31.7% of total annualized base rent of our consolidated and unconsolidated properties (assuming 100% ownership of our unconsolidated properties). We are not aware of any current customers whose inability alone to pay their contractual rental amounts would have a material adverse impact on our results of operations. See Item 2, “Properties,” for further detail about customer diversification.

Conflicts of Interest

We are subject to various potential conflicts of interest that could arise out of our relationship with the Advisor and other affiliates and related parties, including: conflicts related to the compensation arrangements among the Advisor, certain affiliates and related parties, and us; conflicts with respect to the allocation of the Advisor’s and its key personnel’s time; conflicts related to our potential acquisition of assets from affiliates of the Advisor; and conflicts with respect to the allocation of investment opportunities. Further, entities currently sponsored by or that in the future may be advised by affiliates of the Sponsor, and those in which Sponsor-affiliated or related entities own interests, may compete with us or may be given priority over us with respect to the acquisition of certain types of investments. As a result of our potential competition with these entities, certain investment opportunities that would otherwise be available to us may not in fact be available. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Advisor and Its Affiliates,” for additional detail. The independent directors have an obligation to function on our behalf in all situations in which a conflict of interest may arise and have a fiduciary obligation to act on behalf of our stockholders.

Compliance with Federal, State and Local Environmental Laws

Properties that we acquire, and the properties underlying our investments, are subject to various federal, state, and local environmental laws, ordinances, and regulations. Under these laws, ordinances, and regulations, a current or previous owner of real estate (including, in certain circumstances, a secured lender that succeeds to ownership or control of a property) may become liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at, on, under, or in its property. These laws typically impose cleanup responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or control party knew of or was responsible for the release or presence of the hazardous or toxic substances. The costs of investigation, remediation, or removal of these substances may be substantial and could exceed the value of the property. An owner or control party of a site may be subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from a site. Certain environmental laws also impose liability in connection with the handling of or exposure to materials containing asbestos. These laws allow third parties to seek recovery from owners of properties for personal injuries associated with materials containing asbestos. Our operating costs and the values of these assets may be adversely affected by the obligation to pay for the cost of complying with existing environmental laws, ordinances, and regulations, as well as the cost of complying with future legislation, and our income and ability to make distributions to our stockholders could be affected adversely by the existence of an environmental liability with respect to our properties. We will endeavor to ensure our properties are in compliance in all material respects with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances, and regulations regarding hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products.

Employees

We have no employees. Pursuant to the terms of the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor assumes principal responsibility for managing our affairs and we compensate the Advisor for certain services.

Additional Information

Our internet address is www.bcindustrialiv.com. Through a link on our website, we make available, free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and prospectus, along with any amendments to those filings, as soon as reasonably practicable after we file or furnish them to the SEC.

4

ITEM 1A.       RISK FACTORS

RISKS RELATED TO INVESTING IN OUR PUBLIC OFFERING

There is no assurance that we will be able to successfully achieve our investment objectives; the prior performance of other Sponsor affiliated entities may not be an accurate barometer of our future results.

We may not be able to achieve our investment objectives. We have experienced net loss, as defined by GAAP. As a result, an investment in our shares of common stock may entail more risk than the shares of common stock of a real estate investment trust with a substantial operating history. In addition, stockholders should not rely on the past performance of investments by other Sponsor affiliated entities to predict our future results. Our investment strategy and key employees may differ from the investment strategies and key employees of other Sponsor affiliated programs in the past, present and future.

Because we generally do not mark to market our property-level mortgages and corporate-level credit facilities that are intended to be held to maturity, or our associated interest rate hedges that are intended to be held to maturity, the realizable value of our company or our assets that are encumbered by debt may be higher or lower than the value used in the calculation of our NAV.

In accordance with our valuation procedures, our property-level mortgages and corporate-level credit facilities that are intended to be held to maturity (which for fixed rate debt not subject to interest rate hedges may be the date near maturity at which time the debt will be eligible for prepayment at par for purposes herein), including those subject to interest rates hedges, are valued at par (i.e. at their respective outstanding balances). Because we often utilize interest rate hedges to stabilize interest payments (i.e. to fix all-in interest rates through interest rate swaps or to limit interest rate exposure through interest rate caps) on individual loans, each loan and associated interest rate hedge is treated as one financial instrument, which is valued at par if intended to be held to maturity. As a result, the realizable value of our company or our assets that are encumbered by debt used in the calculation of our NAV may be higher or lower than the value that would be derived if such debt instruments were marked to market. For example, if we decide to sell one or more assets, we may re-classify those assets as held-for-sale, which could then have a positive or negative impact on our calculation of NAV to the extent any associated debt is definitively intended to be prepaid. In some cases such difference may be significant. This policy of valuing at par applies regardless of whether any given interest rate hedge is considered an asset or liability for GAAP purposes. We currently estimate the fair value of our debt (inclusive of associated interest rate hedges) that was intended to be held to maturity as of December 31, 2020 was $13.4 million higher than par for such debt in aggregate, meaning that if we used the fair value of our debt rather than par (and treated the associated hedge as part of the same financial instrument), our NAV would have been lower by approximately $13.4 million, or $0.09 per share, not taking into account all of the other items that impact our monthly NAV, as of December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, we classified all of our debt as intended to be held to maturity.

There is no public trading market for the shares of our common stock and we do not anticipate that there will be a public trading market for our shares; therefore, our stockholders’ ability to dispose of their shares will likely be limited to redemption by us. If our stockholders do sell their shares to us, they may receive less than the price they paid.

There is no public market for the shares of our common stock and we currently have no obligation or plans to apply for listing on any public securities market. Therefore, redemption of the shares of our common stock by us will likely be the only way for our stockholders to dispose of their shares. We will redeem shares at a price equal to the transaction price on the last calendar day of the applicable month, and not based on the price at which our stockholders initially purchased their shares. We may redeem our stockholders’ shares if they fail to maintain a minimum balance of $2,000 of shares, even if their failure to meet the minimum balance is caused solely by a decline in our NAV. Since Class T shares are sold at the transaction price plus applicable upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees, holders of Class T shares may receive less than the price they paid for their shares upon redemption by us. Subject to limited exceptions, holders of our common stock that have not held their shares for at least one year will be eligible for redemption at 95% of the transaction price on the redemption date, which will inure indirectly to the benefit of our remaining stockholders. As a result of this and the fact that our NAV will fluctuate, holders of our common stock may receive less than the price they paid for their shares upon redemption by us.

5

Our ability to redeem our stockholders’ shares may be limited. In addition, our board of directors may modify, suspend or terminate our share redemption program at any time.

Our share redemption program contains significant restrictions and limitations. For example, if holders of our common stock do not hold their shares for a minimum of one year, then they will only be eligible for redemption at 95% of the transaction price on the redemption date.

We may redeem fewer shares than have been requested in any particular month to be redeemed under our share redemption program, or none at all, in our discretion at any time. We may redeem fewer shares due to lack of readily available funds because of adverse market conditions beyond our control, the need to maintain liquidity for our operations or because we have determined that investing in real property or other illiquid investments is a better use of our capital than redeeming our shares. In addition, the total amount of aggregate redemptions of Class T, Class W, and Class I shares (based on the price at which the shares are redeemed) will be limited for each calendar month to 2% of the aggregate NAV of all classes as of the last calendar day of the previous quarter and for each calendar quarter will be limited to 5% of the aggregate NAV of all classes of shares as of the last calendar day of the previous calendar quarter. With respect to the limitations described above, (i) provided that this share redemption program has been operating and not suspended for the first month of a given quarter and that all properly submitted redemption requests were satisfied, any unused capacity for that month will carry over to the second month and (ii) provided that this share redemption program has been operating and not suspended for the first two months of a given quarter and that all properly submitted redemption requests were satisfied, any unused capacity for those two months will carry over to the third month. In no event will such carry-over capacity permit the redemption of shares with aggregate value (based on the redemption price per share for the month the redemption is effected) in excess of 5% of the combined NAV of all classes of shares as of the last calendar day of the previous calendar quarter (provided that for these purposes redemptions may be measured on a net basis as described in the paragraph below).

We currently measure the foregoing redemption allocations and limitations based on net redemptions during a month or quarter, as applicable. The term “net redemptions” means, during the applicable period, the excess of our share redemptions (capital outflows) over the proceeds from the sale of our shares (capital inflows). With respect to future periods, our board of directors may choose whether the allocations and limitations will be applied to “gross redemptions,” i.e., without netting against capital inflows, rather than to net redemptions, which could limit the amount of shares redeemed in a given month or quarter despite our receiving a net capital inflow for that month or quarter.

The vast majority of our assets will consist of properties which cannot generally be readily liquidated on short notice without impacting our ability to realize full value upon their disposition. Therefore, we may not always have a sufficient amount of cash to immediately satisfy redemption requests. Further, we may invest in real estate-related securities and other securities with the primary goal of maintaining liquidity in support of our share redemption program. Any such investments may result in lower returns than an investment in real estate assets, which could adversely impact our ability to pay distributions and our stockholders’ overall return. In addition, our board of directors may modify, suspend or terminate our share redemption program at any time in its sole discretion. As a result, our stockholders’ ability to have their shares redeemed by us may be limited, our shares should be considered as having only limited liquidity and at times may be illiquid.

Our capacity to redeem shares may be further limited if we experience a concentration of investors.

The current limitations of our share redemption program are based, in part, on the number of outstanding shares. Thus, the ability of a single investor, or of a group of investors acting similarly, to redeem all of their shares may be limited if they own a large percentage of our shares. Similarly, if a single investor, or a group of investors acting in concert or independently, owns a large percentage of our shares, a significant redemption request by such investor or investors could significantly further limit our ability to satisfy redemption requests of other investors of such classes. Such concentrations could arise in a variety of circumstances, especially while we have relatively few outstanding shares. For example, we could sell a large number of our shares to one or more institutional investors, either in a public offering or in a private placement. In addition, we may issue a significant number of our shares in connection with an acquisition of another company or a portfolio of properties to a single investor or a group of investors that may request redemption at similar times following the acquisition.

6

Purchases and redemptions of our common shares will not be made based on the current NAV per share of our common stock.

We are offering shares of our common stock at the transaction price, plus applicable selling commissions and dealer manager fees. The transaction price generally will be equal to the NAV per share of our common stock most recently disclosed by us, however, we may offer shares at a price that we believe reflects the NAV per share of such stock more appropriately than the most recently disclosed NAV per share, including by updating a previously disclosed transaction price, in cases where we believe there has been a material change (positive or negative) to our NAV per share relative to the most recently disclosed NAV per share. The transaction price generally will be based on our most recently disclosed monthly NAV of each class of common stock (subject to material changes as described above) and will not be based on any public market. Further, our board of directors may amend our NAV procedures from time to time. For example, if our stockholders wish to subscribe for shares of our common stock in October, their subscription request must be received in good order at least five business days before November 1. Generally, the offering price per share would equal the transaction price of the applicable class as of the last calendar day of September, plus applicable upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees. If accepted, their subscription would be effective on the first calendar day of November. Conversely, if our stockholders wish to submit their shares for redemption in October, their redemption request and required documentation must be received in good order by 4:00 p.m. (Eastern time) on the second to last business day of October. If accepted, their shares would be redeemed as of the last calendar day of October and, generally, the redemption price would equal the transaction price of the applicable class as of the last calendar day of September, subject to a 5.0% reduction, for early redemption of shares of our common stock that have not been outstanding for at least one year. In each of these cases, the NAV that is ultimately determined as of the last day of October may be higher or lower than the NAV as of the last day of September used for determining the transaction price. Therefore, the price at which our stockholders purchase shares may be higher than the current NAV per share at the time of sale and the price at which our stockholders redeem shares may be lower than the current NAV per share at the time of redemption.

In order to provide liquidity to fund redemptions, we currently intend to maintain a number of sources of aggregate liquidity including cash, cash equivalents, other short-term investments, U.S. government securities, agency securities, liquid real estate-related securities and undrawn amounts under our corporate line of credit of 10% of our equity. In addition, we may draw down amounts under our corporate line of credit. These measures may result in lower returns to our stockholders.

Although the majority of our assets consist of properties that cannot generally be readily liquidated on short notice without impacting our ability to realize full value upon their disposition, in order to provide liquidity to fund redemptions, we currently intend to maintain, under normal operating circumstances and subject to any limitations and requirements relating to our qualification as a REIT, a number of sources of liquidity including cash, cash equivalents (e.g. money market funds), other short-term investments, U.S. government securities, agency securities, liquid real estate-related securities and undrawn amounts under our corporate line of credit (“cash-related liquidity”) of 10% of our equity. In addition, we may draw down amounts under our corporate line of credit to cover any difference in our cash-related liquidity allocation, ensuring an allocation to cash-related liquidity of 10% of our equity. Our allocation of a portion of our equity to liquid investments may result in lower returns than if we had invested in additional properties and using borrowings for redemptions will reduce the funds available to retire debt or acquire additional properties, which may result in reduced profitability and restrict our ability to grow our NAV.

Economic events that may cause our stockholders to request that we redeem their shares may materially adversely affect our cash flow and our results of operations and financial condition.

Economic events affecting the U.S. economy, such as the general negative performance of the real estate sector, could cause our stockholders to seek to sell their shares to us pursuant to our share redemption program at a time when such events are adversely affecting the performance of our assets. The redemptions of Class T, Class W and Class I shares are subject to the 2% and 5% limits (as described above) (subject to potential carry-over capacity). Even if we are able to and determine to satisfy all resulting redemption requests, our cash flow could be materially adversely affected. In addition, if we determine to sell assets to satisfy redemption requests, we may not be able to realize the return on such assets that we may have been able to achieve had we sold at a more favorable time, and our results of operations and financial condition, including, without limitation, breadth of our portfolio by property type and location, could be materially adversely affected.

7

A portion of the proceeds raised in our public offering is expected to be used to satisfy redemption requests, and such portion of the proceeds may be substantial.

We currently expect to use a portion of the proceeds from our public offering to satisfy redemption requests with respect to our share redemption program. Using the proceeds from our public offering for redemptions will reduce the net proceeds available to retire debt or acquire additional properties, which may result in reduced liquidity and profitability or restrict our ability to grow our NAV.

Our public offering is a “blind pool” offering and stockholders will not have the opportunity to evaluate our future investments prior to purchasing shares of our common stock.

As a result, stockholders will not be able to evaluate the economic merits, transaction terms or other financial or operational data concerning our future investments that we have not yet identified prior to purchasing shares of our common stock. Stockholders must rely on the Advisor and our board of directors to implement our investment policies, to evaluate our investment opportunities and to structure the terms of our investments. We may invest in any asset class, including those that present greater risk than industrial assets. Because stockholders cannot evaluate our future investments in advance of purchasing shares of our common stock, a “blind pool” offering may entail more risk than other types of offerings. This additional risk may hinder stockholders’ ability to achieve their own personal investment objectives related to portfolio diversification, risk-adjusted investment returns and other objectives.

Our public offering is a “best efforts” offering and if we are unable to raise substantial funds, we will be limited in the number and type of investments we may make which could negatively impact an investment in shares of our common stock.

Our public offering is being made on a “best efforts” basis, whereby the broker dealers participating in the offering are only required to use their best efforts to sell shares of our common stock and have no firm commitment or obligation to purchase any of the shares of our common stock. As a result, the amount of proceeds we raise in our public offering may be substantially less than the amount we would need to achieve a diversified industrial portfolio. Our inability to raise substantial funds would increase our fixed operating expenses as a percentage of gross income, and our financial condition and ability to make distributions could be adversely affected. If we are unable to raise substantially more funds in our public offering, we will be thinly capitalized and will make fewer investments in properties, and will more likely focus on making investments in loans and real estate related entities, resulting in less diversification in terms of the number of investments owned, the geographic regions in which our property investments are located and the types of investments that we make. As a result, the likelihood increases that any single investment’s poor performance would materially affect our overall investment performance. As of December 31, 2020, we had raised gross proceeds of approximately $1.5 billion from the sale of approximately 141.9 million shares of our common stock, including shares issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. See “Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for information concerning our public offerings.

Valuations and appraisals of our properties, real estate-related assets and real estate-related liabilities are estimates of value and may not necessarily correspond to realizable value.

The valuation methodologies that are used to value our properties and certain real estate-related assets involve subjective judgments regarding such factors as comparable sales, rental revenue and operating expense data, known contingencies, the capitalization or discount rate, and projections of future rent and expenses based on appropriate analysis. As a result, any valuations and appraisals of our properties, real estate-related assets and real estate-related liabilities are only estimates of current market value. Ultimate realization of the value of an asset or liability depends to a great extent on economic and other conditions beyond our control and the control of the Independent Valuation Advisor and other parties involved in the valuation of our assets and liabilities. Further, these valuations may not necessarily represent the price at which an asset or liability would sell, because market prices of assets and liabilities can only be determined by negotiation between a willing buyer and seller. Valuations used for determining our NAV also are generally made without consideration of the expenses that would be incurred in connection with disposing of assets and liabilities. Therefore, the valuations of our properties, our investments in real estate-related assets and our liabilities may not correspond to the timely realizable value upon a sale of those assets and liabilities. In addition, the value of our interest in any joint venture or partnership that is a minority interest or is restricted as to salability or transferability may reflect or be adjusted for a minority or liquidity discount. In determining the amount of such discount, consideration may be given to a variety of factors, including, without limitation, the nature and length of such restriction. As a result, the realizable value of our interest in joint ventures or partnerships used in the calculation of our NAV may be lower than the value that would be derived if a minority or liquidity discount had not been applied, which could then have a negative impact on our calculation of NAV. Similarly, if any such properties held in a joint venture or partnership in which we own a minority interest are transferred to us as part of a liquidation of the assets of the joint venture or partnership or other transaction resulting in our ownership of 100% of such properties, it could have a positive

8

impact on the calculation of our NAV. In some cases, the impact may be significant. As an example, we estimate the fair value of our minority ownership interests in the BTC Partnerships as of December 31, 2020 would have been $48.3 million higher if a minority discount had not been applied, meaning that if we used the estimated fair value without the application of the minority discount, our NAV would have been higher by approximately $48.3 million, or $0.34 per share, not taking into account all of the other items that impact our monthly NAV, as of December 31, 2020.

In addition to being a month old when share purchases and redemptions take place, our NAV may not represent the then-current enterprise value and may not accurately reflect the actual prices at which our assets could be liquidated on any given day, the value a third party would pay for all or substantially all of our shares, or the price that our shares would trade at on a national stock exchange. There will be no retroactive adjustment in the valuation of such assets or liabilities, the price of our shares of common stock, the price we paid to redeem shares of our common stock or NAV-based fees we paid to the Advisor, the Sponsor and Black Creek Capital Markets, LLC (the “Dealer Manager”) to the extent such valuations prove to not accurately reflect the true estimate of value and are not a precise measure of realizable value. Because the price our stockholders will pay for shares of our common stock in our public offering, and the price at which our stockholders’ shares may be redeemed by us pursuant to our share redemption program, will generally be based on our monthly NAV per share, our stockholders may pay more than realizable value or receive less than realizable value for our stockholders’ investment.

In order to disclose a monthly NAV, we are reliant on the parties that we engage for that purpose, in particular the Independent Valuation Advisor and the appraisers that we hire to value and appraise our real estate portfolio.

In order to disclose a monthly NAV, our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, has adopted valuation procedures that contain a comprehensive set of methodologies to be used in connection with the calculation of our NAV, including the engagement of independent third parties such as the Independent Valuation Advisor, to value our real estate portfolio on a monthly basis, and independent appraisal firms, to provide periodic appraisals with respect to our properties. We have also engaged a firm to act as the NAV Accountant and may engage other independent third parties or our Advisor to value other assets or liabilities. Although our board of directors, with the assistance of the Advisor, oversees all of these parties and the reasonableness of their work product, we will not independently verify our NAV or the components thereof, such as the appraised values of our properties. Our management’s assessment of the market values of our properties may also differ from the appraised values of our properties as determined by the Independent Valuation Advisor. If the parties engaged by us to determine our monthly NAV are unable or unwilling to perform their obligations to us, our NAV could be inaccurate or unavailable, and we could decide to suspend any ongoing public offering and our share redemption program.

Our NAV is not subject to GAAP, is not independently audited and involves subjective judgments by the Independent Valuation Advisor and other parties involved in valuing our assets and liabilities.

Our valuation procedures and our NAV are not subject to GAAP and are not subject to independent audit. Additionally, we are dependent on our Advisor to be reasonably aware of material events specific to our properties (such as tenant disputes, damage, litigation and environmental issues) that may cause the value of a property to change materially and to promptly notify the Independent Valuation Advisor so that the information may be reflected in our real estate portfolio valuation. In addition, the implementation and coordination of our valuation procedures include certain subjective judgments of our Advisor, such as whether the Independent Valuation Advisor should be notified of events specific to our properties that could affect their valuations, as well as of the Independent Valuation Advisor and other parties we engage, as to whether adjustments to asset and liability valuations are appropriate. Accordingly, our stockholders must rely entirely on our board of directors to adopt appropriate valuation procedures and on the Independent Valuation Advisor and other parties we engage in order to arrive at our NAV, which may not correspond to realizable value upon a sale of our assets.

No rule or regulation requires that we calculate our NAV in a certain way, and our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, may adopt changes to the valuation procedures.

There are no existing rules or regulatory bodies that specifically govern the manner in which we calculate our NAV. As a result, it is important that our stockholders pay particular attention to the specific methodologies and assumptions we will use to calculate our NAV. Other public REITs may use different methodologies or assumptions to determine their NAV. In addition, each year our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, will review the appropriateness of our valuation procedures and may, at any time, adopt changes to the valuation procedures. If we acquire real property assets as a portfolio, we may pay a premium over the amount that we would pay for the assets individually. See our valuation procedures, filed as Exhibit 99.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for more details regarding our valuation methodologies, assumptions and procedures.

9

Our NAV per share may suddenly change if the valuations of our properties materially change from prior valuations or the actual operating results materially differ from what we originally budgeted.

It is possible that the annual appraisals of our properties may not be spread evenly throughout the year and may differ from the most recent monthly valuation. As such, when these appraisals are reflected in our Independent Valuation Advisor’s valuation of our real estate portfolio, there may be a sudden change in our NAV per share for each class of our common stock. Property valuation changes can occur for a variety of reasons, such as local real estate market conditions, rotation of different third-party appraisal firms, the financial condition of our customers, or lease expirations. For example, we expect to regularly face lease expirations across our portfolio, and as we move further away from lease commencement toward the end of a lease term, the valuation of the underlying property will be expected to drop depending on the likelihood of a renewal or a new lease on similar terms. Such a valuation drop can be particularly significant when closer to a lease expiration, especially for single tenant buildings or where an individual tenant occupies a large portion of a building. We will be at the greatest risk of these valuation changes during periods in which we have a large number of lease expirations as well as when the lease of a significant tenant is closer to expiration. Similarly, if a tenant will have an option in the future to purchase one of our properties from us at a price that is less than the current valuation of the property, then if the value of the property exceeds the option price, the valuation will be expected to decline and begin to approach the purchase price as the date of the option approaches. In addition, actual operating results may differ from what we originally budgeted, which may cause a sudden increase or decrease in the NAV per share amounts. We will accrue estimated revenues and expenses on a monthly basis based on actual leases and expenses in that month. On a periodic basis, we will adjust the revenues and expense accruals we estimated to reflect the revenues and expenses actually earned and incurred. We will not retroactively adjust the NAV per share of each class for any adjustments. Therefore, because actual results from operations may be better or worse than what we previously budgeted, the adjustment to reflect actual operating results may cause the NAV per share for each class of our common stock to increase or decrease.

New acquisitions may be valued for purposes of our NAV at less than what we pay for them, which would dilute our NAV.

Pursuant to our valuation procedures, the acquisition price of newly acquired properties will serve as the basis for our appraised value for the year of acquisition, and thereafter will be part of the rotating appraisal cycle such that they are appraised at least every calendar year. This is true whether the acquisition is funded with cash, equity or a combination thereof. However, the Independent Valuation Advisor always has the ability to adjust property valuations for purposes of our NAV from the most recent appraised value. Similarly, if the Independent Valuation Advisor believes that the purchase price for a recent acquisition does not reflect the current value of the property, the Independent Valuation Advisor has the ability to adjust the valuation for purposes of our NAV downwards immediately after acquisition. Even if the Independent Valuation Advisor does not adjust the valuation downwards immediately following the acquisition, when we obtain an appraisal on the property, it may not appraise at a value equal to the purchase price. Accordingly, the value of a new acquisition as established under our valuation procedures could be less than what we pay for it, which could negatively affect our NAV. Large portfolio acquisitions, in particular, may require a “portfolio premium” to be paid by us in order to be a competitive bidder, and this “portfolio premium” may not be taken into consideration in calculating our NAV. In addition, acquisition expenses we incur in connection with new acquisitions will negatively impact our NAV. We may make acquisitions (with cash or equity) of any size without stockholder approval, and such acquisitions may be dilutive to our NAV.

The NAV per share that we publish may not necessarily reflect changes in our NAV that are not immediately quantifiable.

From time to time, we may experience events with respect to our investments that may have a material impact on our NAV. For example, and not by way of limitation, changes in governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies, environmental legislation, acts of God, terrorism, social unrest, civil disturbances and major disturbances in financial markets may cause the value of a property to change materially. The NAV per share of each class of our common stock as published on any given month may not reflect such extraordinary events to the extent that their financial impact is not immediately quantifiable. As a result, the NAV per share that we publish may not necessarily reflect changes in our NAV that are not immediately quantifiable, and the NAV per share of each class published after the announcement of a material event may differ significantly from our actual NAV per share for such class until such time as the financial impact is quantified and our NAV is appropriately adjusted in accordance with our valuation procedures. The resulting potential disparity in our NAV may inure to the benefit of redeeming stockholders or non-redeeming stockholders and new purchasers of our common stock, depending on whether our published NAV per share for such class is overstated or understated.

10

The realizable value of specific properties may change before the value is adjusted by the Independent Valuation Advisor and reflected in the calculation of our NAV.

Our valuation procedures generally provide that the Independent Valuation Advisor will adjust a real property’s valuation, as necessary, based on known events that have a material impact on the most recent value (adjustments for non-material events may also be made). We are dependent on our Advisor to be reasonably aware of material events specific to our properties (such as tenant disputes, damage, litigation and environmental issues, as well as positive events such as new lease agreements) that may cause the value of a property to change materially and to promptly notify the Independent Valuation Advisor so that the information may be reflected in our real estate portfolio valuation. Events may transpire that, for a period of time, are unknown to us or the Independent Valuation Advisor that may affect the value of a property, and until such information becomes known and is processed, the value of such asset may differ from the value used to determine our NAV. In addition, although we may have information that suggests a change in value of a property may have occurred, there may be a delay in the resulting change in value being reflected in our NAV until such information is appropriately reviewed, verified and processed. For example, we may receive an unsolicited offer from an unrelated third party to sell one of our assets at a price that is materially different than the price included in our NAV. Or, we may be aware of a new lease, lease expiry, or entering into a contract for capital expenditure. Where possible, adjustments generally will be made based on events evidenced by proper final documentation. It is possible that an adjustment to the valuation of a property may occur prior to final documentation if the Independent Valuation Advisor determines that events warrant adjustments to certain assumptions (including probability of occurrence) that materially affect value. However, to the extent that an event has not yet become final based on proper documentation, its impact on the value of the applicable property may not be reflected (or may be only partially reflected) in the calculation of our NAV.

Our NAV and the NAV of our stockholders’ shares may be diluted in connection with this and future securities offerings.

In connection with our public offering, we incur fees and expenses, which will decrease the amount of cash we have available for operations and new investments. In addition, because the prices of shares sold in our public offering will be based on our monthly NAV per share, our public offering may be dilutive if our NAV procedures do not fully capture the value of our shares and/or we do not utilize the proceeds accretively.

In the future we may conduct other offerings of common stock (whether existing or new classes), preferred stock, debt securities or of interests in the Operating Partnership. We may also amend the terms of our public offering. We may structure or amend such offerings to attract institutional investors or other sources of capital. The costs of our public offering and future offerings may negatively impact our ability to pay distributions and our stockholders’ overall return.

Interest rate changes may cause volatility in our monthly NAV.

In accordance with our valuation procedures, we generally will use the fair value of our assets and liabilities related to assets held for sale, if any, to determine our monthly NAV. The fair value of certain of our assets and such liabilities may be very sensitive to interest rate changes, such as fixed rate borrowings and interest rate hedges that are not intended to be held to maturity. As a result, changes in projected forward interest rates may cause volatility in our monthly NAV.

Our stockholders will experience dilution in the net tangible book value of our stockholders’ shares equal to the upfront offering costs associated with their shares.

Our stockholders will incur immediate dilution equal to the upfront costs of the offering associated with the sale of their shares, including with respect to Class T shares sold in the primary offering, upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees, and with respect to all shares sold in the offering, organization and offering expenses. This means that investors who purchase our shares of common stock will pay a price per share that exceeds the amount available to us to purchase assets and therefore, the value of these assets upon purchase.

Our stockholders may be at a greater risk of loss than the Sponsor or the Advisor since our primary source of capital is funds raised through the sale of shares of our common stock.

Because our primary source of capital is funds raised through the sale of shares of our common stock, any losses that may occur will be borne primarily by our stockholders, rather than by the Sponsor or the Advisor.

11

Stockholders will not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review in connection with our public offering, which increases the risk of their investment.

Because the Advisor and the Dealer Manager are affiliates of, or otherwise related to, the Sponsor, stockholders will not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review and investigation of the type normally performed by an independent underwriter in connection with a securities offering. This lack of an independent due diligence review and investigation increases the risk of the stockholders’ investment.

The performance component of the advisory fee is calculated on the basis of the overall investment return provided to holders of Fund Interests over a calendar year, so it may not be consistent with the return on our stockholders’ shares.

The performance component of the advisory fee is calculated on the basis of the overall investment return provided to holders of Fund Interests (i.e., our outstanding shares and OP Units held by third parties) in any calendar year such that the Sponsor (or the Advisor, if the Sponsor elects to have the performance component of the advisory fee paid to the Advisor) will earn a performance component of the advisory fee equal to the lesser of (1) 12.5% of (a) the annual total return amount less (b) any loss carryforward, and (2) the amount equal to (x) the annual total return amount, less (y) any loss carryforward, less (z) the amount needed to achieve an annual total return amount equal to 5.0% of the NAV per Fund Interest at the beginning of such year (the “Hurdle Amount”). Therefore, if the annual total return amount exceeds the Hurdle Amount plus the amount of any loss carryforward, then the Sponsor or the Advisor, as applicable, will earn a performance component equal to 100% of such excess, but limited to 12.5% of the annual total return amount that is in excess of the loss carryforward. The foregoing calculations are performed based on the weighted-average number of outstanding Fund Interests during the year and the weighted-average total return per Fund Interest. The “annual total return amount” referred to above means all distributions paid or accrued per Fund Interest plus any change in NAV per Fund Interest since the end of the prior calendar year, adjusted to exclude the negative impact on annual total return resulting from our payment or obligation to pay, or distribute, as applicable, the performance component of the advisory fee as well as ongoing distribution fees (i.e., our ongoing class-specific fees). If the performance component is being calculated with respect to a year in which we complete a Liquidity Event (if any), for purposes of determining the “annual total return amount,” the change in NAV per Fund Interest will be deemed to equal the difference between the NAV per Fund Interest as of the end of the prior calendar year and the value per Fund Interest determined in connection with such Liquidity Event. The “loss carryforward” referred to above will track any negative annual total return amounts from prior years and offset the positive annual total return amount for purposes of the calculation of the performance component of the advisory fee. The loss carryforward was zero as of the effective date of the Advisory Agreement. Therefore, payment of the performance component of the advisory fee (1) is contingent upon the overall return to the holders of Fund Interests exceeding the Hurdle Amount plus the amount of any loss carryforward, (2) will vary in amount based on our actual performance and (3) cannot cause the overall return to the holders of Fund Interests for the year to be reduced below 5.0%.

As a result of the manner in which the performance component is calculated, as described above, the performance component is not directly tied to the performance of the shares our stockholders purchase, the class of shares they purchase, or the time period during which they own their shares. The performance component may be payable to the Advisor or the Sponsor even if the NAV of a stockholder’s shares at the time the performance component is calculated is below the stockholder’s purchase price, and the thresholds at which increases in NAV count towards the overall return to the holders of Fund Interests are not based on at stockholder’s purchase price. Because of the class-specific allocations of the ongoing distribution fee, which differ among classes, we do not expect the overall return of each class of Fund Interests to ever be the same. However, if and when the performance component of the advisory fee is payable, the expense will be allocated among all holders of Fund Interests ratably according to the NAV of their units or shares, regardless of the different returns achieved by different classes of Fund Interests during the year. Further, our stockholders who redeem their shares during a given year may redeem their shares at a lower NAV per share as a result of an accrual for the estimated performance component of the advisory fee, even if no performance component is ultimately payable to the Advisor or the Sponsor for all or any portion of such calendar year. In addition, if the Sponsor or the Advisor earns the performance component of the advisory fee in any given year, neither of them will be obligated to return any portion of it based on our subsequent performance.

The payment of fees and expenses to the Advisor and its affiliates and the Dealer Manager reduces the cash available for distribution and increases the risk that our stockholders will not be able to recover the amount of their investment in our shares.

The Advisor and the Dealer Manager perform services for us, including, among other things, the selection and acquisition of our investments, the management of our assets, the disposition of our assets, the financing of our assets and certain administrative services. We pay the Advisor and its affiliates and the Dealer Manager fees and expense reimbursements for these services, which will reduce the amount of cash available for further investments or distribution to our stockholders.

12

We will be required to pay substantial compensation to the Advisor and its affiliates or related parties, which may be increased or decreased during our public offering or future offerings by a majority of our board of directors, including a majority of the independent directors.

Subject to limitations in our charter, the fees, compensation, income, expense reimbursements, interest and other payments that we will be required to pay to the Advisor and its affiliates or related parties may increase or decrease during our public offering or future offerings if such change is approved by a majority of our board of directors, including a majority of the independent directors. For example, we recently made substantial changes to our agreements with the Advisor and the Dealer Manager. These payments to the Advisor and its affiliates or related parties will decrease the amount of cash we have available for operations and new investments and could negatively impact our ability to pay distributions and our stockholders overall return.

We may have difficulty completely funding our distributions with funds provided by cash flows from operating activities; therefore, we may use cash flows from financing activities, which may include borrowings and net proceeds from primary shares sold in our public offering, proceeds from the issuance of shares under our distribution reinvestment plan, or other sources to fund distributions to our stockholders. The use of these sources to pay distributions and the ultimate repayment of any liabilities incurred could adversely impact our ability to pay distributions in future periods, decrease the amount of cash we have available for operations and new investments and/or potentially impact the value or result in dilution of our stockholders’ investment by creating future liabilities, reducing the return on their investment or otherwise.

Until the proceeds from our public offering are fully invested, and from time to time thereafter, we may not generate sufficient cash flows from operating activities, as determined on a GAAP basis, to fully fund distributions to our stockholders. To date, we have funded, and expect to continue to fund, distributions to our stockholders, with cash flows from financing activities, which may include borrowings and net proceeds from primary shares sold in our public offering, proceeds from the issuance of shares under our distribution reinvestment plan, proceeds from the sales of assets, or from our cash balances. Our charter does not prohibit our use of such sources to fund distributions. We may be required to fund distributions from a combination of some of these sources if our investments fail to perform as anticipated, if expenses are greater than expected or as a result of numerous other factors. We have not established a cap on the amount of our distributions that may be paid from any of these sources. Using certain of these sources may result in a liability to us, which would require a future repayment. For the year ended December 31, 2020, approximately 1.4% of our total gross distributions were paid from cash flows from operating activities, as determined on a GAAP basis, and 98.6% of our total gross distributions were funded from sources other than cash flows from operating activities; specifically, 20.2% of our total gross distributions were paid from cash provided by expense support from the Advisor, 28.6% of our total gross distributions were funded with proceeds from financing activities and 49.8% were funded with proceeds from the issuance of shares under our distribution reinvestment plan.

The use of the sources described above for distributions and the ultimate repayment of any liabilities incurred, as well as the payment of distributions in excess of our FFO, could adversely impact our ability to pay distributions in future periods, decrease the amount of cash we have available for operations and new investments and reduce our stockholders’ overall return and adversely impact and dilute the value of their investment in shares of our common stock. To the extent distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits (i) do not exceed a stockholder’s adjusted basis in our stock, such distributions will not be taxable to a stockholder, but rather a stockholder’s adjusted basis in our stock will be reduced; and (ii) exceed a stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in our stock, such distributions will be included in income as long-term capital gain if the stockholder has held its shares for more than one year and otherwise as short-term capital gain.

In addition, the Advisor or its affiliates could choose to receive shares of our common stock or interests in the Operating Partnership in lieu of cash or deferred fees or the repayment of advances to which they are entitled, and the issuance of such securities may dilute our stockholders’ investment in shares of our common stock.

There is very limited liquidity for our shares of common stock. If we do not effect a Liquidity Event, it will be very difficult for our stockholders to have liquidity for their investment in shares of our common stock.

On a limited basis, our stockholders may be able to have their shares redeemed through our share redemption program. However, in the future we may also consider various Liquidity Events. There can be no assurance that we will ever seek to effect, or be successful in effecting, a Liquidity Event (as defined in Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities”). Our charter does not require us to pursue a Liquidity Event or any transaction to provide liquidity to our

13

stockholders. If we do not effect a Liquidity Event, it will be very difficult for our stockholders to have liquidity for their investment in shares of our common stock other than limited liquidity through any share redemption program.

We currently do not have research analysts reviewing our performance.

We do not have research analysts reviewing our performance or our securities on an ongoing basis. Therefore, we do not have an independent review of our performance and value of our common stock relative to publicly traded companies.

The availability and timing of cash distributions to our stockholders is uncertain.

We bear all expenses incurred in our operations, which are deducted from cash funds generated by operations prior to computing the amount of cash from operations available for distributions to our stockholders. In addition, there are ongoing distribution fees payable on Class T shares and Class W shares, which will reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to holders of Class T shares and Class W shares. Distributions could also be negatively impacted by the failure to deploy available cash on an expeditious basis, the inability to find suitable investments that are not dilutive to distributions, potential poor performance of our investments, an increase in expenses for any reason (including expending funds for redemptions in excess of the proceeds from our distribution reinvestment plan) and due to numerous other factors. Any request by the holders of our OP Units to redeem some or all of their OP Units for cash may also impact the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders. In addition, our board of directors, in its discretion, may retain any portion of such funds for working capital. There can be no assurance that sufficient cash will be available to make distributions to our stockholders or that the amount of distributions will increase and not decrease over time. Should we fail for any reason to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gain), we would not qualify for the favorable tax treatment accorded to REITs.

If we internalize our management functions, the percentage of our outstanding shares of common stock owned by our other stockholders could be reduced, we could incur other significant costs associated with being self-managed, and any internalization could have other adverse effects on our business and financial condition.

At some point in the future, we may internalize the functions performed for us by the Advisor. The method by which we could internalize these functions could take many forms. We may hire our own group of executives and other employees or we may acquire the Advisor or its assets, including its existing workforce. Any internalization transaction could result in significant payments to the owners of the Advisor, including in the form of our stock which could reduce the percentage ownership of our then existing stockholders and concentrate ownership in the Sponsor. In addition, there is no assurance that internalizing our management functions will be beneficial to us and our stockholders. For example, we may not realize the perceived benefits because of the costs of being self-managed or we may not be able to properly integrate a new staff of managers and employees or we may not be able to effectively replicate the services provided previously by the Advisor or its affiliates. Internalization transactions have also, in some cases, been the subject of litigation. Even if these claims are without merit, we could be forced to spend significant amounts of money defending claims which would reduce the amount of funds available for us to invest in real estate assets or to pay distributions.

If another investment program, whether sponsored by the Sponsor or otherwise, hires the current executives or key personnel of the Advisor in connection with an internalization transaction or otherwise, or if we were to internalize our management but cannot retain some or all of our current executives or key personnel of the Advisor, our ability to conduct our business may be adversely affected.

We will rely on key personnel of the Advisor to manage our day-to-day operating and acquisition activities. In addition, all of our current executives and other key personnel of the Advisor may provide services to one or more other investment programs, including other public investment programs sponsored or advised by affiliates of the Sponsor. These programs or third parties may decide to retain or hire some or all of our current executives and the Advisor’s other key personnel in the future through an internalization transaction or otherwise. If this occurs, we may not be able to retain some or all of our current executives and other key personnel of the Advisor who are most familiar with our business and operations, thereby potentially adversely impacting our business. If we were to effectuate an internalization of the Advisor, we may not be able to retain all of the current executives and the Advisor’s other key personnel or to maintain a relationship with the Sponsor, which also may adversely affect our ability to conduct our business.

14

We have broad authority to incur debt, and high debt levels could hinder our ability to make distributions and could decrease the value of an investment in shares of our common stock.

Under our charter, we have a limitation on borrowing which precludes us from borrowing in excess of 300% of the value of our net assets, provided that we may exceed this limit if a higher level of borrowing is approved by a majority of our independent directors. High debt levels could cause us to incur higher interest charges, could result in higher debt service obligations, could be accompanied by restrictive covenants, and generally could make us subject to the risks associated with higher leverage. These factors could limit the amount of cash we have available to distribute and could result in a decline in the value of an investment in shares of our common stock.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR GENERAL BUSINESS OPERATIONS AND OUR CORPORATE STRUCTURE

If we are delayed in finding or unable to find suitable investments, we may not be able to achieve our investment objectives and make distributions to our stockholders.

We could suffer from delays in identifying suitable investments due to, among other factors, competition we face for real property investments from other REITs and institutional investors, as well as from certain other entities sponsored or advised by affiliates of the Sponsor, which may have greater financial resources than we do, may be able to accept more risk than we can and may possess other significant competitive advantages over us, including a lower cost of capital. Because we are conducting our public offering on a “best efforts” basis over time, our ability to commit to purchase specific assets will also depend, in part, on the amount of proceeds we have received at a given time. If we are delayed in finding or unable to find suitable investments, we may not be able to achieve our investment objectives, make distributions to our stockholders or continue to fund distributions from sources other than cash flows from operating activities. In addition, such delays in our ability to find suitable investments would increase the length of time that offering proceeds are held in short term liquid investments that are expected to only produce minimal returns.

We anticipate that our investments will continue to be concentrated in the industrial real estate sector and primarily in the largest distribution and logistics markets in the U.S., and our business could be adversely affected by an economic downturn in that sector or in those geographic areas.

We anticipate that our investments will continue to be concentrated in the industrial real estate sector and primarily in the largest distribution and logistics markets in the U.S. Such industry concentration may expose us to the risk of economic downturns in this sector, such as downturns that may result from economic uncertainty with respect to imports and international trade or changes to trade agreements, to a greater extent than if our business activities included investing a more significant portion of the net proceeds of our public offering in other sectors of the real estate industry; and such market concentrations may expose us to the risk of economic downturns in these areas. As of December 31, 2020, 18.3%, 11.0%, 10.5% and 10.4% of our total annualized base rent of our consolidated and unconsolidated properties (assuming 100% ownership of our unconsolidated properties) was concentrated in the Southern California, Dallas, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey markets, respectively. As a result of this geographic concentration, our business is dependent on the economy in these markets generally, and on the respective markets for industrial property demand in particular, which could expose us to greater economic risks than if we were invested in a more geographically diverse portfolio. In addition, if our customers are concentrated in any particular industry, any adverse economic developments in such industry could expose us to additional risks. These concentration risks could negatively impact our operating results and affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Compliance with the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest by participating broker dealers may negatively impact our ability to raise capital in this offering, which would harm our ability to achieve our investment objectives.

Commencing June 30, 2020, broker dealers are required to comply with Regulation Best Interest, which, among other requirements, establishes a new standard of conduct for broker dealers and their associated persons when making a recommendation of any securities transaction or investment strategy involving securities to a retail customer. The impact of Regulation Best Interest on participating broker dealers cannot be determined at this time, and it may negatively impact whether participating broker dealers and their associated persons recommend this offering to certain retail customers. If Regulation Best Interest reduces our ability to raise capital in this offering, it would harm our ability to further expand and diversify our portfolio of investments, as well as our ability to achieve our investment objectives.

15

We are dependent on customers for revenue and our inability to lease our properties or to collect rent from our customers will adversely affect our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.

Our revenues from property investments depend on the creditworthiness of our customers and would be adversely affected by the loss of or default by significant customers. Much of our customer base is comprised of non-rated and non-investment grade customers. As of December 31, 2020, our top five customers represented 22.8% of our total annualized base rent of our consolidated and unconsolidated properties (assuming 100% ownership of our unconsolidated properties), our top ten customers represented 31.7% of our total annualized base rent of our consolidated and unconsolidated properties (assuming 100% ownership of our unconsolidated properties) and there was one customer that individually represented more than 5.0% of our total annualized base rent of our consolidated and unconsolidated properties (assuming 100% ownership of our unconsolidated properties). Our results of operations are currently substantially dependent on our top customers, and any downturn in their businesses could have a material adverse effect on our operations. In addition, certain of our properties are occupied by a single customer, and as a result, the success of those properties depends on the financial stability of that customer. Lease payment defaults by customers could impact operating results, causing us to lower our NAV, reduce the amount of distributions to our stockholders, or could force us to find an alternative source of funding to pay any mortgage loan interest or principal, taxes, or other obligations relating to the property. In the event of a customer default, we may also experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-leasing our property. If a lease is terminated, the value of the property may be immediately and negatively affected and we may be unable to lease the property for the rent previously received or at all or sell the property without incurring a loss.

A prolonged national or world-wide economic downturn or volatile capital market conditions could harm our operations, cash flows and financial condition and lower returns to our stockholders.

If disruptions in the capital and credit markets occur, they could adversely affect our ability to obtain loans, credit facilities, debt financing and other financing, or, when available, to obtain such financing on reasonable terms, which could negatively impact our ability to implement our investment strategy.

If these disruptions in the capital and credit markets should occur as a result of, among other factors, uncertainty, changing regulation, changes in trade agreements, reduced alternatives or additional failures of significant financial institutions, our access to liquidity could be significantly impacted. For example, customers and potential customers of our properties operate in industries including e-commerce, traditional retail, third-party logistics, warehousing and manufacturing, all of which may be adversely impacted by recently enacted and proposed changes to U.S. foreign trade policies, including tariffs and other impositions on imported goods, trade sanctions imposed on certain countries, the limitation on the importation of certain types of goods or of goods containing certain materials from other countries and other policies. Prolonged disruptions could result in us taking measures to conserve cash until the markets stabilize or until alternative credit arrangements or other funding for our business needs could be arranged. Such measures could include deferring investments, reducing or eliminating the number of shares redeemed under our share redemption program and reducing or eliminating distributions we make to our stockholders.

We believe the risks associated with our business are more severe during periods of economic downturn if these periods are accompanied by declining values in real estate. For example, a prolonged economic downturn could negatively impact our property investments as a result of increased customer delinquencies and/or defaults under our leases, generally lower demand for rentable space, potential oversupply of rentable space leading to increased concessions, and/or tenant improvement expenditures, or reduced rental rates to maintain occupancies. Our operations could be negatively affected to a greater extent if an economic downturn occurs, is prolonged or becomes more severe, which could significantly harm our revenues, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, business prospects and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

The current outbreak of the novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, has caused severe disruptions in the U.S. and global economy and will likely have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. This impact could be materially adverse to the extent the current COVID-19 outbreak, or future pandemics, cause customers to be unable to pay their rent or reduce the demand for commercial real estate, or cause other impacts described below.

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China. COVID-19 has since spread to over 100 countries, including the United States. COVID-19 has also spread to every state in the United States. On March 11, 2020 the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic, and on March 13, 2020 the United States declared a national emergency with respect to COVID-19.

16

The outbreak of COVID-19 in many countries, including the United States, continues to adversely impact global economic activity and has contributed to significant volatility and negative pressure in financial markets. The global impact of the outbreak has been rapidly evolving and, as cases of the virus have continued to be identified in additional countries, many countries, including the United States, have reacted by instituting quarantines and restrictions on travel.

Between March and May 2020, nearly all U.S. cities and states, including cities and states where our properties are located, have also reacted by instituting quarantines, restrictions on travel, “shelter in place” rules, restrictions on types of business that may continue to operate, and/or restrictions on types of construction projects that may continue. Beginning in early May 2020, parts of the U.S. began to ease the lockdown restrictions and allow for the reopening of businesses. The gradual reopening of retail, manufacturing, and office facilities came with required or recommended safety protocols. However, due to the continuation of new COVID-19 cases, these lockdown restrictions were reinstated in certain areas to varying degrees. Additionally, there is no assurance that the reopening of businesses, even if those businesses adhere to recommended safety protocols, will enable us or many of our customers to avoid adverse effects on our and our customers’ operations and businesses. The COVID-19 outbreak has had, and future pandemics could have, a significant adverse impact on economic and market conditions of economies around the world, including the United States, and has triggered a period of global economic slowdown or global recession.

The effects of COVID-19 or another pandemic could adversely affect us and/or our customers due to, among other factors:

● the unavailability of personnel, including executive officers and other leaders that are part of the management team and the inability to recruit, attract and retain skilled personnel—to the extent management or personnel are impacted in significant numbers by the outbreak of pandemic or epidemic disease and are not available or allowed to conduct work—business and operating results may be negatively impacted;

● difficulty accessing debt and equity capital on attractive terms, or at all—a severe disruption and instability in the global financial markets or deteriorations in credit and financing conditions may affect our and our customers’ ability to access capital necessary to fund business operations or replace or renew maturing liabilities on a timely basis, and may adversely affect the valuation of financial assets and liabilities, any of which could affect our ability to meet liquidity and capital expenditure requirements or have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows;

● an inability to operate in affected areas, or delays in the supply of products or services from the vendors that are needed to operate effectively;

● customers’ inability to pay rent on their leases or our inability to re-lease space that is or becomes vacant, which inability, if extreme, could cause us to: (i) no longer be able to pay distributions at our current rates or at all in order to preserve liquidity and (ii) be unable to meet our debt obligations to lenders, which could cause us to lose title to the properties securing such debt, trigger cross-default provisions, or could cause us to be unable to meet debt covenants, which could cause us to have to sell properties or refinance debt on unattractive terms;

● Uncertainty related to whether the U.S. Congress or state legislatures will pass additional laws providing for additional economic stimulus packages, governmental funding, or other relief programs, whether such measures will be enacted, whether our customers will be eligible or will apply for any such funds, whether the funds, if available, could be used by our customers to pay rent, and whether such funds will be sufficient to supplement our customers’ rent and other obligations to us;

● an inability to ensure business continuity in the event our continuity of operations plan is not effective or improperly implemented or deployed during a disruption;

● our inability to raise capital in our ongoing public offering, if investors are reluctant to purchase our shares;

● our inability to deploy capital due to slower transaction volume which may be dilutive to stockholders; and

● our inability to satisfy redemption requests and preserve liquidity, if demand for redemptions exceeds the limits of our share redemption program or ability to fund redemptions.

Because our property investments are located in the United States, COVID-19 continues to impact our properties and operating results

17

given its continued spread within the United States reduces occupancy, increases the cost of operation, results in limited hours or necessitates the closure of such properties. In addition, quarantines, states of emergencies and other measures taken to curb the spread of COVID-19 may negatively impact the ability of such properties to continue to obtain necessary goods and services or provide adequate staffing, which may also adversely affect our properties and operating results.

Customers and potential customers of the properties we own operate in industries that are being adversely affected by the disruption to business caused by this global outbreak. Customers or operators have been, and may in the future be, required to suspend operations at our properties for what could be an extended period of time. Although a number of our customers requested rent deferrals in the second quarter of 2020, these requests significantly decreased in the third and fourth quarters. However, as a result of COVID-19 or another future pandemic, more customers may request rent deferrals or may not pay rent in the future. This could lead to increased customer delinquencies and/or defaults under leases, a lower demand for rentable space leading to increased concessions or lower occupancy, and/or tenant improvement expenditures, or reduced rental rates to maintain occupancies. Our operations could be materially negatively affected if the economic downturn is prolonged, which could adversely affect our operating results, ability to pay our distributions, our ability to repay or refinance our debt, and the value of our shares.

Although multiple vaccines have been approved for use, there is uncertainty as to when a sufficient portion of the population will be vaccinated such that restrictions and safety protocols can be relaxed. The rapid development and fluidity of this situation precludes any prediction as to the ultimate impact of COVID-19. The full extent of the impact and effects of COVID-19 on our future financial performance, as a whole, and, specifically, on our real estate property holdings are uncertain at this time. The impact will depend on future developments, including, among other factors, the duration of the outbreak, vaccine distribution, travel advisories and restrictions, the recovery time of the disrupted supply chains, the consequential staff shortages, and production delays, and the uncertainty with respect to the duration of the global economic slowdown. COVID-19 and the current financial, economic and capital markets environment, and future developments in these and other areas present uncertainty and risk with respect to our performance, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and value of our shares.

The current outbreak of COVID-19 and resulting impacts on the U.S. economy and financial markets has created extreme uncertainty and volatility with respect to the current and future values of real estate, and therefore our NAV per share, as well as the market value of our debt (including associated interest rate hedges). As a result, our NAV per share may not reflect the actual realizable value of our underlying properties at any given time or the market value of our debt (including associated interest rate hedges).

The current outbreak of COVID-19 and resulting impacts on the U.S. economy and financial markets have created extreme uncertainty and volatility with respect to the current and future values of real estate and real estate-related assets, borrowings and hedges. The recent COVID-19 pandemic is expected to continue to have a significant impact on local, national and global economies and has resulted in a world-wide economic slowdown. The fallout from the ongoing pandemic on our investments is uncertain; however, it has had a negative impact on the overall real estate market, with a particularly adverse impact on certain sectors, including hospitality, shopping malls, gaming, and student living. In addition, slower transaction volume may result in less data for assessing real estate values. This increases the risk that our NAV per share may not reflect the actual realizable value of our underlying properties at any given time, as valuations and appraisals of our properties and real estate-related assets are only estimates of market value as of the end of the prior month and may not reflect the changes in values resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, as this impact is occurring rapidly and is not immediately quantifiable. To the extent real estate values decline after the date we disclose our NAV, whether due to the COVID-19 pandemic or otherwise, (i) we may overpay to redeem our shares, which would adversely affect the investment of non-redeeming stockholders, and (ii) new investors may overpay for their investment in our common stock, which would heighten their risk of loss. Furthermore, because we generally do not mark to market our property-level mortgages and corporate-level credit facilities that are intended to be held to maturity, or our interest rate hedges that are intended to be held to maturity, the realizable value of our company or our assets that are encumbered by debt may be higher or lower than the value used in the calculation of our NAV. This risk may be exacerbated by the current market volatility, which can lead to large and sudden swings in the fair value of our assets and liabilities. We currently estimate the fair value of our debt (inclusive of associated interest rate hedges) that was intended to be held to maturity as of December 31, 2020 was $13.4 million higher than par for such debt in aggregate, meaning that if we used the fair value of our debt rather than par (and treated the associated hedge as part of the same financial instrument), our NAV would be lower by approximately $13.4 million, or $0.09 per share, as of December 31, 2020.

Yields on and safety of deposits may be lower due to the extensive decline in the financial markets.

Until we invest the proceeds of the offerings in properties, debt and other investments, we generally plan to hold those funds in permitted investments. Subject to applicable REIT rules, such investments include money market funds, bank money market accounts and CDs or

18

other accounts at third-party depository institutions. Continuous or unusual declines in the financial markets may result in a loss of some or all of these funds. In particular, during times of economic distress, money market funds have experienced intense redemption pressure and have had difficulty satisfying redemption requests. As such, we may not be able to access the cash in our money market investments. In addition, income from these investments is minimal.

The failure of any bank in which we deposit our funds could reduce the amount of cash we have available to pay distributions and make additional investments.

We will seek to diversify our excess cash and cash equivalents among several banking institutions in an attempt to minimize exposure to any one of these entities. However, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation generally only insures amounts up to $250,000 per depositor per insured bank. It is likely that we will have cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash deposited in certain financial institutions substantially in excess of federally insured levels. If any of the banking institutions in which we deposit funds ultimately fails, we may lose our deposits over $250,000. The loss of our deposits could reduce the amount of cash we have available to distribute or invest and could result in a decline in the value of our stockholders’ investment.

Non-traded REITs have been the subject of increased scrutiny by regulators and media outlets resulting from inquiries and investigations initiated by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and the SEC. We could become the subject of scrutiny and may face difficulties in raising capital should negative perceptions develop regarding non-traded REITs. As a result, we may be unable to raise substantial funds which would negatively impact our business.

Our securities are sold primarily through the independent broker dealer channel (i.e., U.S. broker dealers that are not affiliated with money center banks or similar financial institutions). Governmental and self-regulatory organizations like the SEC and FINRA impose and enforce regulations on broker dealers, investment banking firms, investment advisers and similar financial services companies. Self-regulatory organizations, such as FINRA, adopt rules, subject to approval by the SEC that govern aspects of the financial services industry and conduct periodic examinations of the operations of registered investment dealers and broker dealers.

As a result of this increased scrutiny and accompanying negative publicity and coverage by media outlets, FINRA may impose additional restrictions on sales practices in the independent broker dealer channel for non-traded REITs, and accordingly we may face increased difficulty in raising capital in our public offering. If we are unable to raise substantial funds in our public offering, the number and type of investments we may make will be limited, which would negatively impact our overall business plan. If we become the subject of scrutiny, even if we have complied with all applicable laws and regulations, responding to such scrutiny could be expensive, harmful to our reputation, distracting to our management and may negatively impact our ability to raise capital.

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence, civilian unrest or war may affect the markets in which we operate, our operations and our profitability.

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence, civilian unrest, or war may negatively affect our operations and our stockholders’ investment. We may acquire real estate assets located in areas that are susceptible to attack. In addition, any kind of terrorist activity or violent criminal acts, including terrorist acts against public institutions or buildings or modes of public transportation (including airlines, trains or buses) could have a negative effect on our business. These events may directly impact the value of our assets through damage, destruction, loss or increased security costs. Although we may obtain terrorism insurance, we may not be able to obtain sufficient coverage to fund any losses we may incur. Risks associated with potential acts of terrorism could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. Further, certain losses resulting from these types of events are uninsurable or not insurable at reasonable costs.

More generally, any terrorist attack, other act of violence or war, including armed conflicts, could result in increased volatility in, or damage to, the worldwide financial markets and economy. Increased economic volatility could adversely affect our customers’ ability to pay rent on their leases or our ability to borrow money or issue capital stock at acceptable prices and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

Our business could suffer in the event the Advisor, the Dealer Manager, our transfer agent or any other party that provides us with services essential to our operations experiences system failures or cyber incidents or a deficiency in cybersecurity.

The Advisor, the Dealer Manager, our transfer agent and other parties that provide us with services essential to our operations are vulnerable to service interruptions or damages from any number of sources, including computer viruses, malware, unauthorized access,

19

energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication failures. Any system failure or accident that causes interruptions in our operations could result in a material disruption to our business. A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of information resources. More specifically, a cyber incident is an intentional attack or an unintentional event that may include, but is not limited to, gaining unauthorized access to systems to disrupt operations, corrupt data, steal assets or misappropriate company funds and/or confidential information, including, for example, confidential information regarding our stockholders. As reliance on technology in our industry has increased, so have the risks posed to our systems, both internal and those we have outsourced. In addition, the risk of cyber incidents has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Cyber incidents may be carried out by third parties or insiders, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, using techniques that range from highly sophisticated efforts to more traditional intelligence gathering and social engineering aimed at obtaining information. The remediation costs and lost revenues experienced by a victim of a cyber incident may be significant and significant resources may be required to repair system damage, protect against the threat of future security breaches or to alleviate problems, including reputational harm, loss of revenues and litigation, caused by any breaches. There also may be liability for any stolen assets or misappropriated company funds or confidential information. Any material adverse effect experienced by the Advisor, the Dealer Manager, our transfer agent and other parties that provide us with services essential to our operations could, in turn, have an adverse impact on us.

Our board of directors determines our major policies and operations which increases the uncertainties faced by our stockholders.

Our board of directors determines our major policies, including our policies regarding acquisitions, dispositions, financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification, listing, redemptions and distributions. Our board of directors may amend or revise these and other policies without providing notice to or obtaining the consent of our stockholders, which could result in investments that are different than those described in our prospectus. Under the Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter, our stockholders have a right to vote only on limited matters. Our board of directors’ broad discretion in setting policies and our stockholders’ inability to exert control over those policies increases the uncertainty and risks our stockholders face, especially if our board of directors and our stockholders disagree as to what course of action is in our stockholders’ best interests.

Our board of directors adopted a delegation of authority policy and pursuant to such policy, has established the Combined Industrial Advisors Committee, which is not a committee of our board of directors, but consists of certain of our officers and officers of the Advisor.  Our board of directors has delegated to the Combined Industrial Advisors Committee certain responsibilities with respect to certain acquisition, disposition, leasing, capital expenditure and borrowing decisions, which may result in our making riskier investments and which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our board of directors has delegated to the Combined Industrial Advisors Committee the authority to execute certain transactions and make certain decisions on our behalf. The Combined Industrial Advisors Committee has the authority to approve certain transactions, including acquisitions, dispositions and leases, as well as to make decisions with respect to capital expenditures and borrowings, in each case so long as such investments and decisions meet certain board-approved parameters (that include limitations regarding the dollar amount of the transactions, among others) and are consistent with the requirements of our charter. There can be no assurance that the Combined Industrial Advisors Committee will be successful in applying any strategy or discretionary approach to our investment activities pursuant to this delegation of authority. Our board of directors will review the investment decisions made pursuant to this delegation of authority periodically. The prior approval of our board of directors or a committee of our independent directors will be required as set forth in our charter (including for transactions with affiliates of the Advisor) or for transactions or decisions that are outside of the board-approved parameters placed on this delegation of authority. Transactions entered into and decisions made by the Combined Industrial Advisors Committee on our behalf may be costly, difficult or impossible to unwind if our board of directors later reviews them and determines that they should not have been entered into or made.

Tax protection agreements could limit our ability to sell or otherwise dispose of property contributed to the Operating Partnership.

In connection with contributions of property to the Operating Partnership, our Operating Partnership may enter into a tax protection agreement with the contributor of such property that provides that if we dispose of any interest in the contributed property in a taxable transaction within a certain time period, subject to certain exceptions, we may be required to indemnify the contributor for its tax liabilities attributable to the built in gain that exists with respect to such property interests, and the tax liabilities incurred as a result of such tax protection payment. Therefore, although it may be in our stockholders’ best interests that we sell the contributed property, it may be economically prohibitive for us to do so because of these obligations.

20

Tax protection agreements may require our Operating Partnership to maintain certain debt levels that otherwise would not be required to operate our business.

Under a tax protection agreement, our Operating Partnership may provide the contributor of property the opportunity to guarantee debt or enter into a deficit restoration obligation. If we fail to make such opportunities available, we may be required to deliver to such contributor a cash payment intended to approximate the contributor’s tax liability resulting from our failure to make such opportunities available to that contributor and the tax liabilities incurred as a result of such tax protection payment. These obligations may require the Operating Partnership to maintain more or different indebtedness than we would otherwise require for our business.

Certain provisions in the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership may delay, defer or prevent an unsolicited acquisition of us or a change of our control.

Provisions in the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership may delay, defer or prevent an unsolicited acquisition of us or a change of our control. These provisions include, among others:

● redemption rights of qualifying parties;

● a requirement that we may not be removed as the general partner of the operating partnership without our consent;

● transfer restrictions on our Operating Partnership units (“OP Units”);

● our ability, as general partner, in some cases, to amend the partnership agreement without the consent of the limited partners; and

● the right of the limited partners to consent to transfers of the general partnership interest and mergers under specified circumstances.

These provisions could discourage third parties from making proposals involving an unsolicited acquisition of us or a change of our control, although some stockholders might consider such proposals, if made, desirable. Our charter and bylaws, the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership and Maryland law also contain other provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control of us that might involve a premium price for our common stock or that our stockholders otherwise might believe to be in their best interests.

Our UPREIT structure may result in potential conflicts of interest with limited partners in the Operating Partnership whose interests may not be aligned with those of our stockholders.

Limited partners in the Operating Partnership have the right to vote on certain amendments to the sixth amended and restated limited operating partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership as well as on certain other matters. Persons holding such voting rights may exercise them in a manner that conflicts with our stockholders’ interests. In addition, conflicts of interest may exist or could arise in the future as a result of the relationships between us and our affiliates, on the one hand, and the Operating Partnership or any partner thereof, on the other hand. Our directors and officers have duties to our company and our stockholders under Maryland law in connection with their management of our company.

We may acquire co-ownership interests in property that are subject to certain co-ownership agreements which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations, relative to if the co-ownership agreements did not exist.

We may acquire co-ownership interests, especially in connection with the Operating Partnership’s potential private placements, such as tenancy-in-common interests in property, interests in Delaware statutory trusts that own property and/or similar interests, which are subject to certain co-ownership agreements. The co-ownership agreements may limit our ability to encumber, lease, or dispose of our co-ownership interest. Such agreements could affect our ability to turn our investments into cash and could affect cash available for distributions to our stockholders. The co-ownership agreements could also impair our ability to take actions that would otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders and, therefore, may have an adverse effect on our results of operations, relative to if the co-ownership agreements did not exist.

21

The Operating Partnership’s private placements of beneficial interests in specific Delaware statutory trusts under our DST Program could cause our leverage ratio to increase or subject us to liabilities from litigation or otherwise.

We, through the Operating Partnership, intend to initiate a program to raise capital in private placements exempt from registration under Section 506(b) of the Securities Act through the sale of beneficial interests in specific Delaware statutory trusts holding real properties, including properties currently indirectly owned by the Operating Partnership. These interests may serve as replacement properties for investors seeking to complete like-kind exchange transactions under Section 1031 of the Code. All of the interests sold to investors pursuant to such private placements will be leased-back by the Operating Partnership or a wholly owned subsidiary thereof, as applicable, and fully guaranteed by the Operating Partnership, although there can be no assurance that the Operating Partnership can or will fulfill these guarantee obligations. Additionally, the Operating Partnership will be given a fair market value purchase option giving it the right, but not the obligation, to acquire the interests in the Delaware statutory trust from the investors at a later time in exchange for OP Units. In the event the Operating Partnership elects not to exercise the purchase option our leverage ratio could increase based on remaining master lease obligations. This may result in both increased costs to us and a negative impact on our overall debt covenants. In addition, in the event the Operating Partnership elects not to exercise the purchase option and the DST Property is sold to a third party, the master lease will terminate, triggering an obligation on the part of a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, as master tenant, to pay to the trust an amount equal to the positive difference, if any, between the fair market value of the DST Property with the master lease in place as if such automatic termination had not occurred, and the gross purchase price to be paid by the third party buyer to the trust to acquire the DST Property. However, if the gross purchase price for the DST Property exceeds the fair market value of the DST Property subject to the master lease, no payment to the trust by the master tenant will be required. Further, investors who acquired interests pursuant to such private placements may have been seeking certain tax benefits that depend on the interpretation of, and compliance with, federal and state income tax laws and regulations. As the general partner of the Operating Partnership, we may become subject to liability, from litigation or otherwise, as a result of such transactions, including in the event an investor fails to qualify for any desired tax benefits.

The Operating Partnership’s private placements of beneficial interests in specific Delaware statutory trusts under our DST Program will not shield us from risks related to the performance of the real properties held through such structures.

Pursuant to the DST Program, the Operating Partnership intends to place certain of its existing real properties and/or acquire new properties to place into specific Delaware statutory trusts and then sell interests, via its taxable REIT subsidiary (TRS), in such trusts to third-party investors. We will hold long-term leasehold interests in the property pursuant to master leases that are fully guaranteed by our Operating Partnership, while the third-party investors indirectly hold some or all of the interests in the real estate. There can be no assurance that the Operating Partnership can or will fulfill these guarantee obligations. Although we will hold a fair market value purchase option (the “FMV Option”) to reacquire the real estate through a purchase of interests in the Delaware statutory trust, the purchase price will be based on the then-current fair market value of the third-party investor’s interest in the real estate, which will be greatly impacted by the rental terms fixed by the long-term master lease. Under the lease we are responsible for subleasing the property to occupying tenants until the earlier of the expiration of the master lease or our exercise of the FMV Option, which means that we bear the risk that the underlying cash flow from the property and all capital expenditures may be less than the master lease payments until such time. Therefore, even though we will no longer own the underlying real estate, because of the fixed terms of the long-term master lease guaranteed by our Operating Partnership, negative performance by the underlying properties could affect cash available for distributions to our stockholders and will likely have an adverse effect on our results of operations and NAV.

We may own beneficial interests in trusts owning real property that will be subject to the agreements under our DST Program, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations, relative to if the DST Program agreements did not exist.

In connection with the anticipated future launch of our DST Program, we may own beneficial interests in trusts owning real property that are subject to the terms of the agreements provided by our DST Program. The DST Program agreements may limit our ability to encumber, lease or dispose of our beneficial interests. Such agreements could affect our ability to turn our beneficial interests into cash and could affect cash available for distributions to our stockholders. The DST Program agreements expected to be used in connection with the DST Program could also impair our ability to take actions that would otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders and, therefore, may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and NAV, relative to if the DST Program agreements did not exist.

22

Properties that are placed into the DST Program and later reacquired may be less liquid than other assets, which could impair our ability to utilize cash proceeds from sales of such properties for other purposes such as paying down debt, distributions, or additional investments.

Properties that are placed into the DST Program (the “DST Program Asset”) may later be reacquired through exercise of the option granted to our Operating Partnership. In such cases the investors who become limited partners in the Operating Partnership (the “DST Investors”) will generally remain tied to the applicable DST Program Asset in terms of basis and built-in-gain. As a result, if the applicable DST Program Asset is subsequently sold, unless we effectuate a like-kind exchange under Section 1031 of the Code, then tax will be triggered on the DST Investors’ built-in-gain. Although we are not contractually obligated to do so, we have generally sought to execute 1031 exchanges in such situations rather than trigger gain. Any replacement property acquired in connection with a 1031 exchange will similarly be tied to the DST Investors with similar considerations if such replacement property ever is sold. As a result of these factors, placing properties into the DST Program may limit our ability to access liquidity from such properties or replacement properties through sale without triggering taxes due to the built-in-gain tied to DST Investors. Such reduced liquidity could impair our ability to utilize cash proceeds from sales for other purposes such as paying down debt, paying distributions, funding redemptions or making additional investments.

Investors who use DST Investor Loans to acquire interests in Delaware Statutory Trusts as part of the DST Program may default on such loans.

As part of the DST Program, the BCIX Lender will provide DST Investor Loans to certain DST Investors who acquire interests in Delaware Statutory Trusts.  DST Investor Loans will be secured by the DST Investor’s interests in the Delaware Statutory Trust acquired using the DST Investor Loan, and will be non-recourse to the borrowing DST Investor subject to commercially customary recourse carveouts. We may suffer losses if the fair market value of the DST Program Asset underlying the Delaware Statutory Trust interest acquired by the DST Investor declines after the DST Investor’s borrowing with respect to a DST Investor Loan, or if there is otherwise a default on a DST Investor Loan. 

If we invest in a limited partnership as a general partner, we could be responsible for all liabilities of such partnership.

We may invest in limited partnership entities through joint ventures or other co-ownership arrangements, in which we acquire all or a portion of our interest in such partnership as a general partner. Such general partner status could expose us to all the liabilities of such partnership. Additionally, we may take a non-managing general partner interest in the limited partnership, which would limit our rights of management or control over the operation of the partnership but would still make us potentially liable for all liabilities of the partnership. Therefore, we may be held responsible for all of the liabilities of an entity in which we do not have full management rights or control, and our liability may be greater than the amount or value of our initial, or then current, investment in the entity.

Cash redemptions to holders of OP Units will reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders or to honor their redemption requests under our share redemption program.

The holders of OP Units (other than us) generally have the right to cause the Operating Partnership to redeem all or a portion of their OP Units for, at our sole discretion, shares of our common stock, cash, or a combination of both. Our election to redeem OP Units for cash may reduce funds available for distribution to our stockholders or to honor our stockholders’ redemption requests under our share redemption program.

Maryland law and our organizational documents limit our stockholders’ rights to bring claims against our officers and directors.

Maryland law provides that a director will not have any liability as a director so long as he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interests, and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. In addition, our charter provides that, subject to the applicable limitations set forth therein or under Maryland law, no director or officer will be liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages. Our charter also provides that we will generally indemnify and advance expenses to our directors, our officers, the Advisor and its affiliates for losses they may incur by reason of their service in those capacities unless their act or omission was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, they actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or, in the case of any criminal proceeding, they had reasonable cause to believe the act or omission was unlawful. Moreover, we have entered into separate indemnification agreements with each of our officers and directors. As a result, we and our stockholders have more limited rights against these persons than might otherwise exist under common law.

23

In addition, we are obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by these persons in some cases. However, our charter provides that we may not indemnify our directors, the Advisor and its affiliates for any liability or loss suffered by them or hold our directors, the Advisor and its affiliates harmless for any liability or loss suffered by us unless they have determined that the course of conduct that caused the loss or liability was in our best interests, they were acting on our behalf or performing services for us, the liability or loss was not the result of negligence or misconduct by our non-independent directors, the Advisor and its affiliates or gross negligence or willful misconduct by our independent directors, and the indemnification or agreement to hold harmless is recoverable only out of our net assets or the proceeds of insurance and not from our stockholders.

We may issue preferred stock, additional shares of common stock or other classes of common stock, which issuance could adversely affect the holders of our common stock issued pursuant to our public offering.

Holders of our common stock do not have preemptive rights to any shares issued by us in the future. We may issue additional shares of common stock, without stockholder approval, including through the declaration of stock dividends, at a price which could dilute the value of existing stockholders’ shares. Further, we may issue, without stockholder approval, preferred stock or other classes of common stock with voting and conversion rights which could adversely affect the voting power of the common stockholders and with rights that could dilute the value of our stockholders’ shares of common stock. This would increase the number of stockholders entitled to distributions without simultaneously increasing the size of our asset base. Under our charter, we have authority to issue a total of 1.7 billion shares of capital stock. Of the total number of shares of capital stock authorized (a) 1.5 billion shares are designated as common stock, including 225.0 million classified as Class I shares, 1.2 billion classified as Class T shares and 75.0 million classified as Class W shares, and (b) 200.0 million shares are designated as preferred stock. Our board of directors may amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of authorized shares of capital stock or the number of authorized shares of capital stock of any class or series that we have authority to issue without stockholder approval. Investors will also experience dilution if we issue equity compensation pursuant to our equity incentive plans, issue shares or OP Units to the Advisor in lieu of cash payments or reimbursements under the Advisory Agreement, or redeem OP Units for shares of common stock. In addition, we may cause the Operating Partnership to issue a substantial number of additional OP Units in order to raise capital in relation to the DST Program or otherwise, acquire properties, consummate a merger, business combination or another significant transaction. OP Units may generally be converted into shares of our common stock, thereby diluting the percentage ownership interest of other stockholders. Ultimately, any additional issuance by us of equity securities or by the Operating Partnership of OP Units will dilute our stockholders’ indirect interest in the Operating Partnership, through which we own all of our interests in our investments. If we ever created and issued preferred stock with a distribution preference over common stock, payment of any distribution preferences of outstanding preferred stock would reduce the amount of funds available for the payment of distributions on our common stock. Further, holders of preferred stock are normally entitled to receive a preference payment in the event we liquidate, dissolve or wind up before any payment is made to our common stockholders, likely reducing the amount common stockholders would otherwise receive upon such an occurrence. In addition, under certain circumstances, the issuance of preferred stock or a separate class or series of common stock may render more difficult or tend to discourage:

● A merger, tender offer or proxy contest;

● The assumption of control by a holder of a large block of our securities; and/or

● The removal of incumbent management.

The limit on the percentage of shares of our common stock that any person may own may discourage a takeover or business combination that could benefit our stockholders.

Our charter restricts the direct or indirect ownership by one person or entity to no more than 9.8% of the value of our then outstanding capital stock (which includes common stock and any preferred stock we may issue) and no more than 9.8% of the value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our then outstanding common stock. This restriction may discourage a change of control of us and may deter individuals or entities from making tender offers for shares of our common stock on terms that might be financially attractive to stockholders or which may cause a change in our management. This ownership restriction may also prohibit business combinations that would have otherwise been approved by our board of directors and our stockholders. In addition to deterring potential transactions that may be favorable to our stockholders, these provisions may also decrease our stockholders’ ability to sell their shares of our common stock.

24

Maryland law and our organizational documents limit our stockholders’ ability to amend our charter or terminate our company without the approval of our board of directors.

Although the Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts published by the North American Securities Administrators Association (the “Statement of Policy”), indicates that stockholders are permitted to amend our charter or terminate our company without the necessity for concurrence by our board of directors, we are required to comply with the Maryland General Corporation Law, which provides that any amendment to our charter or any termination of our company must first be declared advisable by our board of directors. Therefore, our charter provides that stockholders may vote to authorize the amendment of our charter or the termination of our company, but only after such action has been declared advisable by our board of directors. Accordingly, the only proposals to amend our charter or to terminate our company that will be presented to our stockholders will be those that have been declared advisable by our board of directors.

A change in U.S. accounting standards regarding operating leases may make the leasing of our properties less attractive to our potential customers, which could reduce overall demand for property leasing services.

In order to address concerns raised by the SEC regarding the transparency of contractual lease obligations under the existing accounting standards for operating leases, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-02 on February 25, 2016, which substantially changes the current lease accounting standards, primarily by eliminating the concept of operating lease accounting. As a result, a lease asset and obligation will be recorded on the customer’s balance sheet for all lease arrangements. In addition, ASU 2016-02 will impact the method in which contractual lease payments will be recorded. In order to mitigate the effect of the new lease accounting standards, customers may seek to negotiate certain terms within new lease arrangements or modify terms in existing lease arrangements, such as shorter lease terms, which would generally have less impact on their balance sheets. Also, customers may reassess their lease-versus-buy strategies. This could result in a greater renewal risk, a delay in investing our offering proceeds, or shorter lease terms, all of which may negatively impact our operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders. The new leasing standard became effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018.

Our bylaws designate the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.

Our bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland shall be the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders with respect to our company, our directors, our officers or our employees (we note we currently have no employees). This choice of forum provision will not apply to claims arising under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that the stockholder believes is favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees, which may discourage meritorious claims from being asserted against us and our directors, officers and employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of our charter inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. We adopted this provision because we believe it makes it less likely that we will be forced to incur the expense of defending duplicative actions in multiple forums and less likely that plaintiffs’ attorneys will be able to employ such litigation to coerce us into otherwise unjustified settlements, and we believe the risk of a court declining to enforce this provision is remote, as the General Assembly of Maryland has specifically amended the Maryland General Corporation Law to authorize the adoption of such provisions.

RISKS RELATED TO INVESTMENTS IN PROPERTY

Changes in global, national, regional or local economic, demographic, political, real estate or capital market conditions may adversely affect our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.

We are subject to risks generally incident to the ownership of property including changes in global, national, regional or local economic, demographic, political, real estate, or capital market conditions and other factors particular to the locations of the respective property investments. We are unable to predict future changes in these market conditions. For example, an economic downturn or a rise in interest rates could make it more difficult for us to lease properties or dispose of them. In addition, rising interest rates could also make alternative interest bearing and other investments more attractive and, therefore, potentially lower the relative value of our existing real estate investments.

25

Adverse economic and other conditions in the regions where our assets are located may adversely affect our levels of occupancy, the terms of our leases, and our ability to lease available areas, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our results of operations depend substantially on our ability to lease the areas available in the properties that we own as well as the price at which we lease such space. Adverse conditions in the regions and specific markets where we operate may reduce our ability to lease our properties, reduce occupancy levels, restrict our ability to increase rental rates and force us to lower rental rates and/or offer customer incentives. Should our assets fail to generate sufficient revenues for us to meet our obligations, our financial condition and results of operations, as well as our ability to make distributions, could be adversely affected. The following factors, among others, may adversely affect the operating performance of our properties:

● Economic downturn and turmoil in the financial markets may preclude us from leasing our properties or increase the vacancy level of our assets;

● Periods of increased interest rates could result in, among other things, an increase in defaults by customers, a decline in our property values, and make it more difficult for us to dispose of our properties at an attractive price;

● Rising vacancy rates for commercial property, particularly in large metropolitan areas;

● Our inability to attract and maintain quality customers;

● Default or breaches by our customers of their contractual obligations;

● Increases in our operating costs, including the need for capital improvements;

● Increases in the taxes levied on our business;

● Regulatory changes affecting the real estate industry, including zoning rules; and

● Susceptibility of certain areas to natural disasters.

We anticipate that our investments in real estate assets will be concentrated in industrial properties, and the demand for industrial space in the U.S. is related to the level of economic activity. Accordingly, reduced economic activity may lead to lower occupancy and/or rental rates for our properties.

Properties that we may own or acquire that incur vacancies for a significant period of time could be difficult to sell, which could diminish the return to our stockholders.

A property may incur a vacancy either by the continued default of a customer under its lease or the expiration of the lease. We may have difficulty obtaining a new customer for any vacant space we have in our real properties, including properties we acquire with vacancies. If property vacancies continue for a long period of time, we may suffer reduced revenues, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and NAV, or result in lower cash distributions to our stockholders. In addition, because properties’ market values depend principally upon the cash flow generated by the properties’ leases, the resale value of properties with prolonged vacancies could suffer, which could further reduce returns to our stockholders.

Risks related to the development of properties may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.

The risk associated with development and construction activities carried out by real estate companies like ours include, among others, the following:

● Long periods of time may elapse between the commencement and the completion of our projects;

● Construction and development costs may exceed original estimates;

26

● The developer/builder may be unable to index costs or receivables to inflation indices prevailing in the industry;

● The level of interest of potential customers for a recently launched development may be low;

● There could be delays in obtaining necessary permits;

● The supply and availability of construction materials and equipment may decrease and the price of construction materials and equipment may increase;

● Construction and sales may not be completed on time, resulting in a cost increase;

● It may be difficult to acquire land for new developments or properties;

● Labor may be in limited availability;

● Changes in tax, real estate and zoning laws may be unfavorable to us; and

● Unforeseen environmental or other site conditions.

In addition, our reputation and the construction quality of any future real estate developments, whether operated individually or through partnerships, may be determining factors for our ability to lease space and grow. The timely delivery of real estate projects and the quality of our developments, however, will depend on certain factors beyond our full control, including the quality and timeliness of construction materials delivered to us and the technical capabilities of our contractor. If one or more problems affect our real estate developments, our reputation and future performance may be negatively affected and we may be exposed to civil liability.

Companies in the real estate industry, including us, depend on a variety of factors outside of their control to develop, build and operate real estate projects. These factors include, among others, the availability of market resources for financing, land acquisition and project development. We may be unable to obtain financing for construction and development activities under favorable terms, including but not limited to interest rates, maturity dates and/or loan to value ratios, or at all, which could cause us to delay or even abandon potential development projects. Further, any scarcity of market resources, including human capital, may decrease our development capacity due to either difficulty in obtaining credit for land acquisition or construction financing or a need to reduce the pace of our growth. The combination of these risks may adversely affect our revenues, results of operations, financial condition and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders which may adversely affect the value of our stockholders’ investment.

Delays in the acquisition, development and construction of properties or debt investments may have adverse effects on portfolio diversification, results of operations, and returns on our stockholders’ investment.

Delays we encounter in the acquisition, development and construction of properties could adversely affect our stockholders’ returns. To the extent that such disruptions continue, we may be delayed in our ability to invest our capital in property investments that meet our acquisition criteria. Such delays would result in our maintaining a relatively higher cash balance than expected, which could have a negative effect on our stockholders’ returns until the capital is invested.

In addition, where properties are acquired prior to the start of construction or during the early stages of construction, it will typically take several months or longer to complete construction, to rent available space, and for rent payments to commence. Therefore, we may not receive any income from these properties and distributions to our stockholders could suffer. Delays in the completion of construction could give customers the right to terminate preconstruction leases for space at a newly developed project. We may incur additional risks when we make periodic progress payments or other advances to builders prior to completion of construction. Each of those factors could result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment. In addition, we will be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects. Furthermore, the price we agree to pay for a property will be based on our projections of rental income and expenses and estimates of the fair market value of the property upon completion of construction. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property.

27

Changes in supply of or demand for similar properties in a particular area may increase the price of real estate assets we seek to purchase or adversely affect the value of the properties we own.

The real estate industry is subject to market forces and we are unable to predict certain market changes including changes in supply of or demand for similar properties in a particular area. For example, if demand for the types of real estate assets in which we seek to invest were to sharply increase or supply of those assets were to sharply decrease, the prices of those assets could rise significantly. Any potential purchase of an overpriced asset could decrease our rate of return on these investments and result in lower operating results and overall returns to our stockholders. Likewise, a sharp increase in supply could adversely affect leasing rates and occupancy, which could impact operating results, our NAV or overall returns to our stockholders.

Actions of joint venture partners could adversely impact our performance.

We have entered, and may continue to enter, into joint venture partnerships with third parties, including entities that are affiliated with the Advisor. We may also purchase and develop properties in joint ventures or in partnerships, co-tenancies or other co-ownership arrangements with the sellers of the properties, affiliates of the sellers, developers or other persons. Such investments may involve risks not otherwise present with a direct investment in real estate, including, for example:

● The possibility that our venture partner, co-tenant or partner in an investment might become bankrupt or otherwise be unable to meet its capital contribution obligations;

● That such venture partner, co-tenant or partner may at any time have economic or business interests or goals which are or which become inconsistent with our business interests or goals;

● That such venture partner, co-tenant or partner may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions or requests or contrary to our policies or objectives; or

● That actions by such venture partner could adversely affect our reputation, negatively impacting our ability to conduct business.

Actions by such a joint venture partner or co-tenant, which are generally out of our control, might have the result of subjecting the property to liabilities in excess of those contemplated and may have the effect of reducing our stockholders’ returns, particularly if the joint venture agreement provides that the joint venture partner is the managing partner or otherwise maintains a controlling interest that could allow it to take actions contrary to our interests.

Under certain joint venture arrangements, neither venture partner may have the power to control the venture, and an impasse could be reached, which might have a negative influence on the joint venture and decrease potential returns to our stockholders. In the event that a venture partner has a right of first refusal to buy out the other partner, it may be unable to finance such a buy-out at that time. For example, certain actions by the joint venture partnership may require joint approval of our affiliated partners, on the one hand, and our joint venture partner, on the other hand. An impasse among the partners could result in a “deadlock event,” which could trigger a buy-sell mechanism under the partnership agreement and, under certain circumstances, could lead to a liquidation of all or a portion of the partnership’s portfolio. In such circumstances, we may also be subject to the 100% penalty tax on “prohibited transactions.” It may also be difficult for us to sell our interest in any such joint venture or partnership or as a co-customer in a particular property. In addition, to the extent that our venture partner or co-customer is an affiliate of the Advisor, certain conflicts of interest will exist.

Properties are illiquid investments and we may be unable to adjust our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions or sell a property if or when we decide to do so.

Properties are illiquid investments and we may be unable to adjust our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions. In addition, the real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, availability of financing, interest rates and other factors, including supply and demand, that are beyond our control. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any property for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property.

28

We may also be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. There can be no assurance that we will have funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements.

In acquiring a property, we may agree to restrictions that prohibit the sale of that property for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed or repaid on that property. All of these provisions would restrict our ability to sell a property.

Our operating expenses may increase in the future and to the extent such increases cannot be passed on to our customers, our cash flow and our operating results would decrease.

Operating expenses, such as expenses for property and other taxes, fuel, utilities, labor, building materials and insurance are not fixed and may increase in the future. Furthermore, we may not be able to pass these increases on to our customers. To the extent such increases cannot be passed on to our customers, any such increases would cause our cash flow and our operating results to decrease.

We compete with numerous other parties or entities for property investments and customers and may not compete successfully.

We compete with numerous other persons or entities seeking to buy or develop real estate assets or to attract customers to properties we already own, including with entities sponsored or advised by affiliates of the Sponsor, which may have a negative impact on our ability to acquire real property assets or attract customers on favorable terms, if at all, and the returns on our properties. These persons or entities may have greater experience and financial strength than us. There is no assurance that we will be able to acquire or develop real estate assets or attract customers on favorable terms, if at all. For example, our competitors may be willing to offer space at rental rates below our rates, causing us to lose existing or potential customers and pressuring us to reduce our rental rates to retain existing customers or convince new customers to lease space at our properties. Similarly, the opening of new competing assets near the assets that we own may hinder our ability to renew our existing leases or to lease to new customers, because the proximity of new competitors may divert existing or new customers to such competitors. In addition, if market rental rates decline during the term of an existing lease, we may be unable to renew or find a new customer without lowering the rental rate. Each of these could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, value of our investments or ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

The operating results of the assets that we own may be impacted by our customers’ financial condition.

Our income is derived primarily from lease payments made by our customers. As such, our performance is indirectly affected by the financial results of our customers, as difficulties experienced by our customers could result in defaults in their obligations to us. Furthermore, certain of our assets may utilize leases with payments directly related to customer sales, where the amount of rent that we charge a customer is calculated as a percentage of such customer’s revenues over a fixed period of time, and a reduction in sales can reduce the amount of the lease payments required to be made to us by customers leasing space in such assets.

The financial results of our customers can depend on several factors, including but not limited to the general business environment, interest rates, inflation, the availability of credit, taxation and overall consumer confidence. An economic downturn can be expected to negatively impact all of these factors, some to a greater degree than others.

In addition, our ability to increase our revenues and operating income partially depends on steady growth of demand for the products and services offered by the customers located in the assets that we own and manage. A drop in demand, as a result of a slowdown in the U.S. and global economy or otherwise, could result in a reduction in customer performance and consequently, adversely affect us.

If we enter into long-term leases with customers, those leases may not result in market rental rates over time, which could adversely affect our revenues and ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

We expect that the majority of our leases will be long-term operating leases. Long-term leases, as well as leases with renewal options that specify a maximum rent increase, may not allow for market-based or significant increases in rental payments during the term of the lease. If we do not accurately judge the potential for increases in market rental rates when negotiating these long-term leases, we may have no ability to terminate those leases or to adjust the rent to then-prevailing market rates. These circumstances could negatively impact our operating results and affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

29

Lease agreements may have specific provisions that create risks to our business and may adversely affect us.

Our lease agreements are regulated by local, municipal, state and federal laws, which may grant certain rights to customers, such as the compulsory renewal of their lease by filing lease renewal actions when certain legal conditions are met. A lease renewal action may represent two principal risks for us: (i) if we plan to vacate a given unit in order to change or adapt an asset’s mix of customers, the customer could remain in that unit by filing a lease renewal action and interfere with our strategy; and (ii) if we desire to increase the lease price for a specific unit, this increase may need to be approved in the course of a lease renewal action, and the final value could be decided at the discretion of a judge. We would then be subject to the court’s interpretation and decision, and could be forced to accept an even lower price for the lease of the unit. The compulsory renewal of our lease agreements and/or the judicial review of our lease prices may adversely affect our cash flow and our operating results.

Certain of our lease agreements are not “triple net leases,” under which the customer undertakes to pay all the expenses of maintaining the leased property, including insurance, taxes, utilities and repairs. We may be exposed to higher maintenance, tax, and property management expenses with respect to all of our leases that are not “triple net.”

Operating expenses, such as expenses for fuel, utilities, labor, building materials and insurance are not fixed and may increase in the future. There is no guarantee that we will be able to pass such increases on to our customers. To the extent such increases cannot be passed on to our customers, any such increases could negatively impact our cash flow, NAV or operating results.

We depend on the availability of public utilities and services, especially for water and electric power. Any reduction, interruption or cancellation of these services may adversely affect us.

Public utilities, especially those that provide water and electric power, are fundamental for the sound operation of our assets. The delayed delivery or any material reduction or prolonged interruption of these services could allow certain customers to terminate their leases or result in an increase in our costs, as we may be forced to use backup generators, which also could be insufficient to fully operate our facilities and could result in our inability to provide services. Accordingly, any interruption or limitation in the provision of these essential services may adversely affect us.

Our industry is subject to extensive regulation, which may result in higher expenses or other negative consequences that could adversely affect us.

Our activities are subject to federal, state and municipal laws, and to regulations, authorizations and license requirements with respect to, among other things, zoning, environmental protection and historical heritage, all of which may affect our business. We may be required to obtain licenses and permits with different governmental authorities in order to acquire and manage our assets.

In addition, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which generally took effect in 2011, contains a sweeping overhaul of the regulation of financial institutions and the financial markets. Key provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act require extensive rulemaking by the SEC and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, some of which remains ongoing. Thus, the full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on our business cannot be fully assessed until all final implementing rules and regulations are promulgated.

Various rules currently in effect under the Dodd-Frank Act may have a significant impact on our business, including, without limitation, provisions of the legislation that increase regulation of and disclosure requirements related to investment advisors, swap transactions and hedging policies, corporate governance and executive compensation, investor protection and enforcement provisions, and asset-backed securities. In February 2017, the U.S. President ordered the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury to review certain existing rules and regulations, such as those promulgated under the Dodd-Frank Act; however, the implications of that review are not yet known and none of the rules and regulations promulgated under the Dodd-Frank Act have been modified or rescinded as of the date of this report.

For example, but not by way of limitation, the Dodd-Frank Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder provide for significantly increased regulation of the derivatives markets and transactions that affect our interest rate hedging activities, including: (i) regulatory reporting, (ii) subject to limited exemptions, mandated clearing through central counterparties and execution on regulated exchanges or execution facilities, and (iii) margin and collateral requirements. While the full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on our interest rate hedging activities cannot be fully assessed until all final implementing rules and regulations are promulgated, the foregoing requirements may affect our ability to enter into hedging or other risk management transactions, may increase our costs in entering into

30

such transactions, and/or may result in us entering into such transactions on less favorable terms than prior to the effectiveness of the Dodd-Frank Act. For example, subject to an exception for “end-users” of swaps upon which we may seek to rely, we may be required to clear certain interest rate hedging transactions by submitting them to a derivatives clearing organization. To the extent we are required to clear any such transactions, we will be required to, among other things, post margin in connection with such transactions. The occurrence of any of the foregoing events may have an adverse effect on our business and on our stockholders’ return.

In addition, public authorities may enact new and more stringent standards, or interpret existing laws and regulations in a more restrictive manner, which may force companies in the real estate industry, including us, to spend funds to comply with these new rules. Any such action on the part of public authorities may adversely affect our results from operations.

In the event of noncompliance with such laws, regulations, licenses and authorizations, we may face the payment of fines, project shutdowns, cancellation of licenses, and revocation of authorizations, in addition to other civil and criminal penalties.

Our properties will be subject to property and other taxes that may increase in the future, which could adversely affect our cash flow.

Our properties will be subject to real and personal property and other taxes that may increase as tax rates change and as the properties are assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. Certain of our leases provide that the property taxes, or increases therein, are charged to the lessees as an expense related to the properties that they occupy while other leases generally provide that we are responsible for such taxes. In any case, as the owner of the properties, we are ultimately responsible for payment of the taxes to the applicable governmental authorities. If property taxes increase, our customers may be unable to make the required tax payments, ultimately requiring us to pay the taxes even if otherwise stated under the terms of the lease. If we fail to pay any such taxes, the applicable taxing authorities may place a lien on the property and the property may be subject to a tax sale. In addition, we will generally be responsible for property taxes related to any vacant space.

Uninsured losses or premiums for insurance coverage relating to property may adversely affect our operating results.

There are types of losses, generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution or environmental matters that are uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations, such as large deductibles or co-payments. Risks associated with potential acts of terrorism could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. Additionally, mortgage lenders sometimes require commercial property owners to purchase specific coverage against terrorism as a condition for providing mortgage loans. These policies may not be available at a reasonable cost, if at all, which could inhibit our ability to finance or refinance our properties. In such instances, we may be required to provide other financial support, either through financial assurances or self-insurance, to cover potential losses. Changes in the cost or availability of insurance could expose us to uninsured casualty losses. In the event that any of our properties incurs a casualty loss that is not fully covered by insurance, the value of our assets will be reduced by any such uninsured loss. In addition, we could be held liable for indemnifying possible victims of an accident. There can be no assurance that funding will be available to us for repair or reconstruction of damaged property in the future or for liability payments to accident victims.

Environmentally hazardous conditions may adversely affect our operating results.

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of property may be liable for the cost of removing or remediating hazardous or toxic substances on such property. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the contamination, each person covered by the environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the clean-up costs incurred. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages based on personal injury, natural resources or property damage or other costs, including investigation and clean-up costs, resulting from the environmental contamination. The presence of hazardous or toxic substances on one of our properties, or the failure to properly remediate a contaminated property, could give rise to a lien in favor of the government for costs it may incur to address the contamination, or otherwise adversely affect our ability to sell or lease the property or borrow using the property as collateral. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated. A property owner who violates environmental laws may be subject to sanctions which may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, private parties. In connection with the acquisition and ownership of our properties, we may be exposed to such costs. The cost of defending against environmental claims, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements or of remediating any contaminated property could materially adversely affect our business, assets or results of operations and, consequently, amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.

31

Environmental laws in the U.S. also require that owners or operators of buildings containing asbestos properly manage and maintain the asbestos, adequately inform or train those who may come into contact with asbestos and undertake special precautions, including removal or other abatement, in the event that asbestos is disturbed during building renovation or demolition. These laws may impose fines and penalties on building owners or operators who fail to comply with these requirements and may allow third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos. Some of our properties may contain asbestos-containing building materials.

We intend to invest in properties historically used for industrial, manufacturing and commercial purposes. Some of these properties may contain at the time of our investment, or may have contained prior to our investment, underground storage tanks for the storage of petroleum products and other hazardous or toxic substances. All of these operations create a potential for the release of petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances. Some of the properties that we acquire may be adjacent to or near other properties that have contained or then currently contain underground storage tanks used to store petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, certain of the properties that we acquire may be on or adjacent to or near other properties upon which others, including former owners or customers of our properties, have engaged, or may in the future engage, in activities that may release petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances.

From time to time, we may acquire properties, or interests in properties, with known adverse environmental conditions. In such an instance, we will underwrite the new anticipated costs of environmental investigation, clean-up and monitoring into the cost, as applicable. Further, in connection with property dispositions, we may agree to remain responsible for, and to bear the cost of, remediating or monitoring certain environmental conditions on the properties.

All of our properties will have been subject to a Phase I or similar environmental assessment by independent environmental consultants prior to or in connection with our acquisition of such properties. Phase I assessments are intended to discover and evaluate information regarding the environmental condition of the surveyed property and surrounding properties. Phase I assessments generally include a historical review, a public records review, an investigation of the surveyed site and surrounding properties, and preparation and issuance of a written report, but do not include soil sampling or subsurface investigations and typically do not include an asbestos survey. Nonetheless, an environmental liability that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations taken as a whole, may exist at the time of acquisition or may arise in the future, with respect to any properties that we acquire. Material environmental conditions, liabilities or compliance concerns may arise after an environmental assessment has been completed. Moreover, it is possible that (i) future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose a material environmental liability or (ii) the then current environmental condition of the properties that we acquire may be affected by customers, by the condition of land or operations in the vicinity of such properties (such as releases from underground storage tanks), or by third parties unrelated to us.

Costs of complying with environmental laws and regulations may adversely affect our income and the cash available for any distributions.

All property and the operations conducted on property are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. Customers’ ability to operate and to generate income to pay their lease obligations may be affected by permitting and compliance obligations arising under such laws and regulations. Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on customers, owners or operators for the costs to investigate or remediate contaminated properties, regardless of fault or whether the acts causing the contamination were legal. Leasing properties to customers that engage in industrial, manufacturing, and commercial activities will cause us to be subject to the risk of liabilities under environmental laws and regulations. In addition, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell, rent or pledge such property as collateral for future borrowings.

Some of these laws and regulations have been amended so as to require compliance with new or more stringent standards as of future dates. Compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretation of existing laws may require us to incur material expenditures. Future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material environmental liability. Additionally, our customers’ operations, the existing condition of land when we buy it, operations in the vicinity of our properties, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, or activities of unrelated third parties may affect our properties. In addition, there are various local, state and federal fire, health, life-safety and similar regulations with which we may be required to comply and which may subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages for noncompliance. Any material expenditures, fines or damages we must pay will reduce our ability to make distributions.

In addition, changes in these laws and governmental regulations, or their interpretation by agencies or the courts, could occur.

32

The costs associated with complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act may reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Investment in properties may also be subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (the “Disabilities Act”). Under this act, all places of public accommodation are required to comply with federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The Disabilities Act has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” that generally require that buildings and services be made accessible and available to people with disabilities. The Disabilities Act’s requirements could require us to remove access barriers and our failure to comply with the act’s requirements could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties or, in some cases, an award of damages. Any monies we use to comply with the Disabilities Act will reduce our NAV and the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

We may not have funding for future customer improvements which may adversely affect the value of our assets, our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.

If a customer at one of our properties does not renew its lease or otherwise vacates its space in one of our buildings, it is likely that, in order to attract one or more new customers, we will be required to expend substantial funds to construct new customer improvements in the vacated space. Substantially all of the net proceeds from our public offering will be used to acquire property, debt and other investments, and we do not anticipate that we will maintain permanent working capital reserves. We do not currently have an identified funding source to provide funds which may be required in the future for customer improvements and customer refurbishments in order to attract new customers. If we do not establish sufficient reserves for working capital or obtain adequate secured financing to supply necessary funds for capital improvements or similar expenses, we may be required to defer necessary or desirable improvements to our properties. If we defer such improvements, the applicable properties may decline in value, and it may be more difficult for us to attract or retain customers to such properties or the amount of rent we can charge at such properties may decrease. There can be no assurance that we will have any sources of funding available to us for repair or reconstruction of damaged property in the future.

Property investments made outside of the U.S. will be subject to currency rate exposure and risks associated with the uncertainty of foreign laws and markets.

We may invest outside of the U.S., most likely in Mexico or Canada, to the extent that opportunities exist that may help us meet our investment objectives. To the extent that we invest in property located outside of the U.S., in addition to risks inherent in an investment in real estate generally discussed herein, we will also be subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, changes in U.S. regulations concerning foreign investments, if any, and the uncertainty of foreign laws and markets including, but not limited to, unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, political and economic instability in certain geographic locations, difficulties in managing international operations, currency exchange controls, potentially adverse tax consequences, additional accounting and control expenses and the administrative burden associated with complying with a wide variety of foreign laws. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates may adversely impact the fair values and earnings streams of our international holdings and therefore the returns on our non-dollar denominated investments. Although we may hedge our foreign currency risk subject to the REIT income qualification tests, we may not be able to do so successfully and may incur losses on these investments as a result of exchange rate fluctuations.

RISKS RELATED TO DEBT FINANCING

We intend to continue to incur mortgage indebtedness, corporate indebtedness and other borrowings, which may increase our business risks, and could hinder our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $582.8 million of consolidated indebtedness outstanding. We intend to continue to finance a portion of the purchase price of our investments by borrowing funds. Under our charter, we have a limitation on borrowing which precludes us from borrowing in excess of 300% of the value of our net assets, provided that we may exceed this limit if a higher level of borrowing is approved by a majority of our independent directors. Net assets for purposes of this calculation are defined to be our total assets (other than intangibles), valued at cost prior to deducting depreciation, reserves for bad debts or other non-cash reserves, less total liabilities. Generally speaking, the preceding limitation provides for borrowings of up to 75% of the aggregate cost of our real estate assets before non-cash reserves and depreciation. In addition, we may incur mortgage debt and pledge some or all of our properties or other assets as security for that debt to obtain funds to acquire additional property, debt or other investments. We may also borrow funds to make distributions, to redeem securities, to satisfy the REIT distribution requirements or for any working capital purposes. Furthermore,

33

we may borrow if we otherwise deem it necessary or advisable to ensure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

High debt levels will cause us to incur higher interest charges, which would result in higher debt service payments and could be accompanied by restrictive covenants. If there is a shortfall between the cash flow from a property and the cash flow needed to service mortgage debt on that property, then the amount available for distributions to stockholders may be reduced. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In that case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in default, thus reducing the value of our stockholders’ investment. For tax purposes, a foreclosure on any of our properties will be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we will recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but we would not receive any cash proceeds. We may give full or partial guarantees to lenders. When we give a guaranty on behalf of an entity that owns one of our properties, we will be responsible to the lender for satisfaction of the debt if it is not paid by such entity. If any mortgage contains cross collateralization or cross default provisions, a default on a single property could affect multiple properties. If any of our properties are foreclosed upon due to a default, our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders could be adversely affected.

We may not be able to obtain debt financing necessary to run our business.

We do not anticipate that we will maintain any permanent working capital reserves. Accordingly, we expect to need to borrow capital for acquisitions, the improvement of our properties, and for other purposes. Under current or future market conditions, we may not be able to borrow all of the funds we may need. If we cannot obtain debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, our ability to acquire new investments to expand our operations will be adversely affected. As a result, we would be less able to achieve our investment objectives, which may negatively impact our results of operations and reduce our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Increases in mortgage interest rates and/or unfavorable changes in other financing terms may make it more difficult for us to finance or refinance properties, which could reduce the number of properties we can acquire and the amount of cash distributions we can make to our stockholders.

If mortgage or corporate debt is unavailable on reasonable terms as a result of increased interest rates, increased credit spreads, decreased liquidity or other factors, we may not be able to finance the initial purchase of properties. In addition, when we incur debt, we run the risk of being unable to refinance such debt when the loans come due, or of being unable to refinance on favorable terms. If interest rates are higher or other financing terms, such as principal amortization, are not as favorable when we refinance debt, our income could be reduced. We may be unable to refinance debt at appropriate times, which may require us to sell properties on terms that are not advantageous to us, or, with respect to mortgage debt, could result in the foreclosure of such properties. If any of these events occur, our cash flow would be reduced. This, in turn, would reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders and may hinder our ability to raise more capital by issuing securities or by borrowing more money.

Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and therefore negatively impact our operating results.

Our debt may be subject to the fluctuation of market interest rates such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), Prime rate, and other benchmark rates. Should such interest rates increase, our debt payments may also increase, reducing cash available for distributions. Furthermore, if we need to repay existing debt during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investments at times which may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments. Additionally, as it relates to any real estate assets that we may own, an increase in interest rates may negatively impact activity in the consumer market and reduce consumer purchases, which could adversely affect us.

Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants that relate to or otherwise limit our operations, which could limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders, to replace the Advisor or to otherwise achieve our investment objectives.

When providing financing, a lender may impose restrictions on us that affect our distribution and operating policies and our ability to incur additional debt. Loan documents we enter into may contain covenants that limit our ability to further mortgage property, discontinue insurance coverage, or make distributions under certain circumstances. In addition, provisions of our loan documents may deter us from replacing the Advisor because of the consequences under such agreements and may limit our ability to replace the property manager or

34

terminate certain operating or lease agreements related to the property. These or other limitations may adversely affect our flexibility and our ability to achieve our investment objectives.

Risks related to floating rate indebtedness rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and therefore negatively impact our operating results.

Borrowings under our line of credit and portions of our borrowings under our term loan are, and certain of our future debt may be, subject to the fluctuation of market interest rates such as the LIBOR, Prime rate, and other benchmark rates. Should such interest rates increase, our debt payments may also increase, reducing cash available for distributions. Furthermore, if we need to repay existing debt during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investments at times which may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments. Additionally, as it relates to any real estate assets that we may own, an increase in interest rates may negatively impact activity in the consumer market and reduce consumer purchases, which could adversely affect us.

Furthermore, U.S. and international regulators and law enforcement agencies have conducted investigations into a number of rates or indices which are deemed to be “reference rates.” Actions by such regulators and law enforcement agencies may result in changes to the manner in which certain reference rates are determined, their discontinuance, or the establishment of alternative reference rates. On November 30, 2020, U.S. and UK regulators and the Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”), which regulates LIBOR, made a series of announcements regarding the end of U.S. Dollar (USD) LIBOR. Collectively, these announcements call for no new LIBOR contracts after December 31, 2021, while giving legacy contracts sufficient time to wind-down, in that LIBOR (other than one-week and two-month LIBOR, which are rarely used) will be available for legacy contracts until June 30, 2023. As a result, we do not intend to use LIBOR as a reference rate in any of our debt agreements entered into after December 31, 2021.

At this time, it is not possible to predict the effect that these developments, the discontinuance of LIBOR, or the discontinuation, modification or other reforms to any other reference rate, or the establishment of alternative reference rates may have on our floating rate indebtedness. The use of alternative reference rates or other reforms could cause the interest rates for our floating rate indebtedness to be materially higher than expected.

We may enter into financing arrangements that require us to use and pledge offering proceeds to secure and repay such borrowings, and such arrangements may adversely affect our ability to make investments and operate our business.

We may enter into financing arrangements that require us to use and pledge future proceeds from our public offering or future offerings, if any, to secure and repay such borrowings. Such arrangements may cause us to have less proceeds available to make investments or otherwise operate our business, which may adversely affect our flexibility and our ability to achieve our investment objectives.

We may enter into financing arrangements involving balloon payment obligations, which may adversely affect our ability to refinance or sell properties on favorable terms, and to make distributions to our stockholders.

Some of our financing arrangements may require us to make a lump-sum or “balloon” payment at maturity. Our ability to make a balloon payment at maturity will be uncertain and may depend upon our ability to obtain additional financing or our ability to sell the particular property. At the time the balloon payment is due, we may or may not be able to refinance the balloon payment on terms as favorable as the original loan or sell the particular property at a price sufficient to make the balloon payment. The effect of a refinancing or sale could affect the rate of return to our stockholders and the projected time of disposition of our assets. In an environment of increasing mortgage rates, if we place mortgage debt on properties, we run the risk of being unable to refinance such debt if mortgage rates are higher at a time a balloon payment is due. In addition, payments of principal and interest made to service our debts, including balloon payments, may leave us with insufficient cash to pay the distributions that we are required to pay to maintain our qualification as a REIT.

The derivative instruments that we may use to hedge against interest rate fluctuations may not be successful in mitigating our risks associated with interest rates and could reduce the overall returns on our stockholders’ investment.

We may use derivative instruments to hedge exposure to changes in interest rates on certain of our variable rate loans, but no hedging strategy can protect us completely. We cannot assure our stockholders that our hedging strategy and the derivatives that we use will adequately offset the risk of interest rate volatility or that our hedging of these transactions will not result in losses. Any settlement charges incurred to terminate unused derivative instruments may result in increased interest expense, which may reduce the overall return on our

35

investments. These instruments may also generate income that may not be treated as qualifying REIT income for purposes of the 75% or 95% REIT income tests.

Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Subject to any limitations required to maintain qualification as a REIT, we manage or may seek to manage our exposure to interest rate volatility by using interest rate hedging arrangements, such as interest rate cap or collar agreements and interest rate swap agreements. These agreements involve risks, such as the risk that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements and that these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes. These interest rate hedging arrangements may create additional assets or liabilities from time to time that may be held or liquidated separately from the underlying property or loan for which they were originally established. Hedging may reduce the overall returns on our investments. Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We assume the risk that our credit facility lenders may not honor their commitments to us.

We may enter into credit facility arrangements with lenders pursuant to which, subject to certain conditions, they commit to lend us money, provide us with letters of credit or provide other financial services to us. If we fail to comply with the covenants in such arrangements, the lenders could declare us in default, accelerate the maturities of our borrowings and refuse to make loans or provide other financial services to us. Or, if a lender becomes unable or unwilling to honor its commitments to us, we may not receive the loans and other financial services for which we negotiated. In such a situation, a replacement lender may be difficult or impossible to find quickly or at all. If we are unable to receive loans and other financial services, our liquidity and business could be negatively impacted.

RISKS RELATED TO INVESTMENTS IN REAL ESTATE-RELATED DEBT AND SECURITIES

The mortgage loans in which we may invest will be subject to the risk of delinquency, foreclosure and loss, which could result in losses to us.

Commercial mortgage loans are secured by commercial property and are subject to risks of delinquency and foreclosure and risks of loss. The ability of a borrower to repay a loan secured by a property typically is dependent primarily upon the successful operation of such property rather than upon the existence of independent income or assets of the borrower. If the net operating income of the property is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Net operating income of an income producing property can be affected by, among other things: customer mix, success of customer businesses, property management decisions, property location and condition, competition from comparable types of properties, changes in laws that increase operating expenses or limit rents that may be charged, any need to address environmental contamination at the property, the occurrence of any uninsured casualty at the property, changes in national, regional or local economic conditions and/or specific industry segments, current and potential future capital markets uncertainty, declines in regional or local real estate values, declines in regional or local rental or occupancy rates, increases in interest rates, real estate tax rates and other operating expenses, changes in governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies, including environmental legislation, acts of God, terrorism, social unrest and civil disturbances.

In the event of any default under a mortgage loan held directly by us, we will bear a risk of loss of principal to the extent of any realized deficiency between the value of the collateral and the principal and accrued interest of the mortgage loan, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and limit amounts available for distribution to our stockholders. In the event of the bankruptcy of a mortgage loan borrower, the mortgage loan to such borrower will be deemed to be secured only to the extent of the value of the underlying collateral at the time of bankruptcy (as determined by the bankruptcy court), and the lien securing the mortgage loan will be subject to the avoidance powers of the bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession to the extent the lien is unenforceable under state law. Foreclosure of a mortgage loan can be an expensive and lengthy process, which could have a substantial adverse effect on our anticipated return on the foreclosed mortgage loan. In addition, if we foreclose on a particular property, we could become, as owner of the property, subject to liabilities associated with such property, including liabilities related to taxes and environmental matters.

36

The mezzanine loans, B-notes, and other junior financings in which we may invest would involve greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by income-producing properties.

We may invest in mezzanine loans, B-notes, and other junior financings that substantially take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on the underlying property or loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of either the entity owning the property or the entity that owns the interest in the entity owning the property. These types of investments involve a higher degree of risk than senior mortgage lending secured by income producing property because the investment may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of such entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan in whole or in part. In addition, there may be significant delays and costs associated with the process of foreclosing on collateral securing or supporting these investments. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment. In addition, mezzanine loans may have higher loan-to-value ratios than conventional mortgage loans, resulting in less equity in the property and increasing the risk of loss of principal. Further, even if we are successful in foreclosing on the equity interests serving as collateral for certain mezzanine loans, such foreclosure could result in us inheriting all of the liabilities of the underlying mortgage borrower, including the senior mortgage on the applicable property. This may result in both increased costs to us and a negative impact on our overall debt covenants and occupancy levels. In many cases a significant restructuring of the senior mortgage may be required in order for us to be willing to retain longer term ownership of the property. If we are unsuccessful in restructuring the underlying mortgage debt in these scenarios, the mortgage lender ultimately may foreclose on the property causing us to lose any of our remaining investment.

The B-notes in which we may invest may be subject to additional risks relating to the privately negotiated structure and terms of the transaction, which may result in losses to us.

We may invest in B-notes. A B-note is a mortgage loan typically (i) secured by a first mortgage on a single large commercial property or group of related properties and (ii) subordinated to an A-note secured by the same first mortgage on the same collateral. As a result, if a borrower defaults, there may not be sufficient funds remaining for B-note holders after payment to the A-note holders. Since each transaction is privately negotiated, B-notes can vary in their structural characteristics and risks. For example, the rights of holders of B-notes to control the process following a borrower default may be limited in certain B-note investments, particularly in situations where the A-note holders have the right to trigger an appraisal process pursuant to which control would shift from the holder of the B-note when it is determined, for instance, that a significant portion of the B-note is unlikely to be recovered. We cannot predict the terms of each B-note investment. Further, B-notes typically are secured by a single property, and, as a result, reflect the increased risks associated with a single property compared to a pool of properties. Our ownership of a B-note with controlling class rights may, in the event the financing fails to perform according to its terms, cause us to elect to pursue our remedies as owner of the B-note, which may include foreclosure on, or modification of, the note or the need to acquire or payoff the A-note. Acquiring or paying off the A-note could require a significant amount of cash, and we may not have sufficient cash to be able to do so.

Bridge loans may involve a greater risk of loss than conventional mortgage loans.

We may provide bridge loans secured by first lien mortgages on properties to borrowers who are typically seeking short-term capital to be used in an acquisition, development or refinancing of real estate. The borrower may have identified an undervalued asset that has been undermanaged or is located in a recovering market. If the market in which the asset is located fails to recover according to the borrower’s projections, or if the borrower fails to improve the quality of the asset’s management or the value of the asset, the borrower may not receive a sufficient return on the asset to satisfy the bridge loan, and we may not recover some or all of our investment.

In addition, owners usually borrow funds under a conventional mortgage loan to repay a bridge loan. We may, therefore, be dependent on a borrower’s ability to obtain permanent financing to repay our bridge loan, which could depend on market conditions and other factors. Bridge loans, like other loans secured directly or indirectly by property, are subject to risks of borrower defaults, bankruptcies, fraud, losses and special hazard losses that are not covered by standard hazard insurance. In the event of any default under bridge loans held by us, we bear the risk of loss of principal and nonpayment of interest and fees to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the mortgage collateral and the principal amount of the bridge loan. Any such losses with respect to our investments in bridge loans could have an adverse effect on our NAV, results of operations and financial condition.

37

Investment in non-conforming and non-investment grade loans may involve increased risk of loss.

Loans we may acquire or originate may not conform to conventional loan criteria applied by traditional lenders and may not be rated or may be rated as non-investment grade. Non-investment grade ratings for these loans typically result from the overall leverage of the loans, the lack of a strong operating history for the properties underlying the loans, the borrowers’ credit history, the properties’ underlying cash flow or other factors. As a result, loans we acquire or originate may have a higher risk of default and loss than conventional loans. Any loss we incur may reduce distributions to stockholders and adversely affect our value.

Risks of cost overruns and non-completion of the construction or renovation of the properties underlying loans we make or acquire may materially adversely affect our investment.

The renovation, refurbishment or expansion by a borrower of a mortgaged or leveraged property involves risks of cost overruns and non-completion. Costs of construction or improvements to bring a property up to standards established for the market intended for that property may exceed original estimates, possibly making a project uneconomical. Other risks may include: environmental risks, permitting risks, other construction risks and subsequent leasing of the property not being completed on schedule or at projected rental rates. If such construction or renovation is not completed in a timely manner, or if it costs more than expected, the borrower may experience a prolonged impairment of net operating income and may not be able to make payments of interest or principal to us.

Interest rate fluctuations and changes in prepayment rates could cause the value of our debt investments to decrease or could reduce our ability to generate income from such investments.

Interest rate risk is the risk that debt investments will decline in value because of changes in market interest rates. Generally, when market interest rates rise, the market value of such investments will decline, and vice versa. Accordingly, the yield on our debt investments may be sensitive to changes in prevailing interest rates and corresponding changes in prepayment rates. Therefore, changes in interest rates may affect our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning investments and the interest expense we incur in financing these investments. Interest rate fluctuations could also cause a borrower to prepay a mortgage loan more quickly than we expect, which could lead to our expected return on the investment being adversely affected.

Our debt investments may be considered illiquid and we may not be able to adjust our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions.

The debt investments we may make in connection with privately negotiated transactions may not be registered under the relevant securities laws, resulting in a prohibition against their transfer, sale, pledge or other disposition except in a transaction that is exempt from the registration requirements of, or is otherwise registered in accordance with, those laws. As a result, our ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions may be relatively limited. The mezzanine, B-note and bridge loans we may originate or purchase in the future may be particularly illiquid investments due to their short life, their unsuitability for securitization and the greater difficulty of recovery in the event of a borrower’s default.

Delays in liquidating defaulted loans could reduce our investment returns.

If there are defaults under mortgage or other types of loans that we make, we may not be able to repossess and sell the underlying properties or equity collateral quickly. The resulting time delay could reduce the value of our investment in the defaulted loans. An action to foreclose on a property securing a loan is regulated by state statutes and regulations and is subject to many of the delays and expenses of other lawsuits if the defendant raises defenses or counterclaims. In the event of default by a mortgagor or other borrower, these restrictions, among other things, may impede our ability to foreclose on or sell the mortgaged property or other equity collateral or to obtain proceeds sufficient to repay all amounts due to us on the mortgage or other type of loan.

We may make investments in non-U.S. dollar denominated securities, which will be subject to currency rate exposure and risks associated with the uncertainty of foreign laws and markets.

Some of our real estate-related securities may be denominated in foreign currencies and, therefore, we expect to have currency risk exposure to any such foreign currencies. A change in foreign currency exchange rates may have an adverse impact on returns on our non-U.S. dollar denominated investments. Although we may hedge our foreign currency risk subject to the REIT income qualification tests, we may not be able to do so successfully and may incur losses on these investments as a result of exchange rate fluctuations. To the extent that

38

we invest in non-U.S. dollar denominated securities, in addition to risks inherent in this investment in securities as generally discussed herein, we will also be subject to risks associated with the uncertainty of foreign laws and markets including, but not limited to, unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, political and economic instability in certain geographic locations, difficulties in managing international operations, currency exchange controls, potentially adverse tax consequences, additional accounting and control expenses and the administrative burden of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws.

Investments in real estate-related debt securities are subject to risks including various creditor risks and early redemption features which may materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

The debt securities and other interests in which we may invest may include secured or unsecured debt at various levels of an issuer’s capital structure. The debt securities in which we may invest may not be protected by financial covenants or limitations upon additional indebtedness, may be illiquid or have limited liquidity, and may not be rated by a credit rating agency. Debt securities are also subject to other creditor risks, including (i) the possible invalidation of an investment transaction as a “fraudulent conveyance” under relevant creditors’ rights laws, (ii) so-called lender liability claims by the issuer of the obligation and (iii) environmental liabilities that may arise with respect to collateral securing the obligations. Our investments may be subject to early redemption features, refinancing options, pre-payment options or similar provisions which, in each case, could result in the issuer repaying the principal on an obligation held by us earlier than expected, resulting in a lower return to us than anticipated or reinvesting in a new obligation at a lower return to us.

We will depend on debtors for our revenue, and, accordingly, our revenue and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders will be dependent upon the success and economic viability of such debtors.

The success of our real estate-related investments will materially depend on the financial stability of the debtors underlying such investments. The inability of a single major debtor or a number of smaller debtors to meet their payment obligations could result in reduced revenue or losses. In the event of a debtor default or bankruptcy, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as a creditor, and such rights may be subordinated to the rights of other creditors. These events could negatively affect the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

We may invest in real estate-related preferred equity securities, which may involve a greater risk of loss than traditional debt financing.

We may invest in real estate-related preferred equity securities, which are currently volatile and which securities may involve a higher degree of risk than traditional debt financing due to a variety of factors, including that such investments are subordinate to traditional loans and are not secured. Furthermore, should the issuer default on our investment, we would only be able to proceed against the entity in which we have an interest, and not the property owned by such entity and underlying our investment. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment. Since there may be a number of debt obligations that have priority over our preferred stock investment, any determination by us to cure defaults could be costly and we may not have the cash to be able to do so. If we become the equity owner of the issuer, we would be responsible for other liabilities of the issuer, including liabilities relating to taxes and environmental matters.

Investments in real estate-related securities will be subject to specific risks relating to the particular issuer of the securities and may be subject to the general risks of investing in subordinated real estate-related securities.

We may invest in real estate-related securities and our investments may consist of real estate related common equity, preferred equity and debt securities of both publicly traded and private real estate companies. Our investments in such real estate related securities will involve special risks relating to the particular issuer of the securities, including the financial condition and business outlook of the issuer. Issuers of real estate related securities generally invest in real estate or real estate related assets and are subject to the inherent risks associated with real estate related debt investments discussed herein.

39

The value of real estate-related securities, including those of publicly listed REITs, fluctuates in response to issuer, political, market and economic developments. For example, equity markets are experiencing significant disruption as a result of the outbreak of COVID-19. In the short term, equity prices can fluctuate dramatically in response to these developments. Different parts of the market and different types of equity securities can react differently to these developments and they can affect a single issuer, multiple issuers within an industry, the economic sector or geographic region, or the market as a whole. The real estate industry is sensitive to economic downturns. The value of securities of companies engaged in real estate activities can be affected by changes in real estate values and rental income, property taxes, interest rates and tax and regulatory requirements. Downturns in equity and debt markets, such as the one we are currently experiencing, will significantly impact the value of our real-estate related securities.

Real estate related securities may be unsecured and subordinated to other obligations of the issuer. As a result, investments in real estate related securities are subject to risks of (i) limited liquidity in the secondary trading, (ii) substantial market price volatility, (iii) subordination to prior claims of banks and other senior lenders of the issuer and preferred equity holders (iv) the operation of mandatory sinking fund or call/redemption provisions during periods of declining interest rates that could cause the issuer to reinvest redemption proceeds in lower yielding assets, (v) the possibility that earnings of the issuer may be insufficient to meet its debt service and distribution obligations and (iv) the declining creditworthiness and potential for insolvency of the issuer during periods of rising interest rates and economic downturn. These risks may adversely affect the value of outstanding real estate related securities and the ability of the issuers thereof to pay dividends.

RISKS RELATED TO THE ADVISOR AND ITS AFFILIATES

Our Advisor faces conflicts of interest because certain of the fees it receives for services performed are based on our NAV, the procedures for which the Advisor will assist our board of directors in developing, overseeing, implementing and coordinating.

The Advisor assists our board of directors in developing, overseeing, implementing and coordinating our NAV procedures. It will assist our Independent Valuation Advisor in valuing our real property portfolio by providing the firm with property-level information, including (i) historical and projected operating revenues and expenses of the property; (ii) lease agreements on the property; and (iii) the revenues and expenses of the property. Our Independent Valuation Advisor assumes and relies upon the accuracy and completeness of all such information, does not undertake any duty or responsibility to verify independently any of such information and relies upon us and our Advisor to advise if any material information previously provided becomes inaccurate or was required to be updated during the period of its review. In addition, the Advisor may have some discretion with respect to valuations of certain assets and liabilities, which could affect our NAV. Because the Advisor is paid certain fees for its services based on our NAV, the Advisor could be motivated to influence our NAV and NAV procedures such that they result in an NAV exceeding realizable value, due to the impact of higher valuations on the compensation to be received by the Advisor. If our NAV is calculated in a way that is not reflective of our actual NAV, then the purchase price of shares of our common stock on a given date may not accurately reflect the value of our portfolio, and our stockholder’s shares may be worth less than the purchase price.

Advisory fees may not create proper incentives or may induce the Advisor and its affiliates to make certain investments, including speculative investments, that increase the risk of our real estate portfolio.

The advisory fees we pay the Advisor or the Sponsor, as applicable, are made up of a fixed component and a performance component. We will pay the Advisor the fixed component regardless of the performance of our portfolio. The Advisor’s entitlement to the fixed component, which is not based upon performance metrics or goals, might reduce its incentive to devote its time and effort to seeking investments that provide attractive risk-adjusted returns for our portfolio. We will be required to pay the Advisor the fixed component in a particular period despite experiencing a net loss or a decline in the value of our portfolio during that period. The performance component, which is based on our total distributions plus the change in NAV per share, may create an incentive for the Advisor to make riskier or more speculative investments on our behalf than it would otherwise make in the absence of such performance-based compensation. Because the performance component is based on our NAV, the Advisor may be motivated to accelerate acquisitions in order to increase NAV or, similarly, delay or curtail dispositions of assets or share redemptions to maintain a higher NAV, which would, in each case, increase amounts payable to the Advisor or the Sponsor.

40

The Advisor’s management personnel, other employees and affiliates face conflicts of interest relating to time management and, accordingly, the Advisor’s management personnel, other employees and affiliates may not be able to devote significant time to our business activities and the Advisor may not be able to hire adequate additional employees.

All of the Advisor’s management personnel, other personnel, affiliates and related parties may also provide services to other Sponsor affiliated entities and related parties. We are not able to estimate the amount of time that such management personnel, other personnel, affiliates and related parties will devote to our business. As a result, the Advisor’s management personnel, other personnel, affiliates and related parties may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between our business and their other activities, which may include advising and managing various other real estate programs and ventures, which may be numerous and may change as programs are closed or new programs are formed. During times of significant activity in other programs and ventures, the time they devote to our business may decline. Accordingly, there is a risk that the Advisor’s affiliates and related parties may not devote significant time to our business activities and the Advisor may not be able to hire adequate additional personnel.

The Advisor and its affiliates or related parties, including our officers and some of our directors, face conflicts of interest caused by compensation arrangements with us, other Sponsor affiliated entities and related parties and joint venture partners or co-owners, which could result in actions that are not in our stockholders’ best interests.

Our executive officers, some of our directors and other key personnel are also officers, directors, managers, key personnel and/or holders of an ownership interest in the Advisor, the Dealer Manager and/or other entities related to our Sponsor. Our Advisor and its affiliates receive substantial fees from us in return for their services and these fees could influence their advice to us. Among other matters, the compensation arrangements could affect their judgment with respect to:

● the continuation, renewal or enforcement of our agreements with the Advisor and its affiliates, including the Advisory Agreement and the agreement with the Dealer Manager;

● recommendations to our board of directors with respect to developing, overseeing, implementing and coordinating our NAV procedures, or the decision to adjust the value of certain of our assets or liabilities if the Advisor is responsible for valuing them;

● public offerings of equity by us, which may result in increased advisory fees for the Advisor;

● competition for customers from entities sponsored or advised by affiliates of our Sponsor that own properties in the same geographic area as us; and

● investments through a joint venture or other co-ownership arrangements, which may result in increased fees for the Advisor.

Further, certain advisory fees paid to our Advisor are paid irrespective of the quality of the underlying real estate or property management services during the term of the related agreement. In evaluating investments and other management strategies, the opportunity to earn these fees may lead our Advisor to place undue emphasis on criteria relating to its compensation at the expense of other criteria, such as preservation of capital, in order to achieve higher short-term compensation. Considerations relating to compensation to our Advisor and its affiliates from us and other entities sponsored or advised by affiliates of our Sponsor could result in decisions that are not in our stockholders’ best interests, which could hurt our ability to pay our stockholders distributions or result in a decline in the value of our stockholders’ investment. Conflicts of interest such as those described above have contributed to stockholder litigation against certain other externally managed REITs that are not affiliated with our Advisor or the Sponsor.

The time and resources that Sponsor affiliated entities and related parties devote to us may be diverted and we may face additional competition due to the fact that Sponsor affiliated entities and related parties are not prohibited from raising money for another entity that makes the same types of investments that we target.

Sponsor affiliated entities and related parties are not prohibited from raising money for another investment entity that makes the same types of investments as those we target. As a result, the time and resources they could devote to us may be diverted. For example, the Dealer Manager is currently involved in separate public offerings for one other entity sponsored or advised by affiliates of the Sponsor. In addition, we may compete with other entities sponsored or advised by affiliates of the Sponsor for the same investors and investment opportunities.

41

We may co-invest or joint venture an investment with a Sponsor affiliated entity or related party.

We may also co-invest or joint venture with other Sponsor affiliated entities and related parties. Even though all such co-investments will be subject to approval by a majority of our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, they could be on terms not as favorable to us as those we could achieve co-investing with a third party. In addition, we may share control with or cede control of the venture to the Sponsor affiliated entity or related party and decisions could be made that are not in our best interests.

We may enter into transactions with the Advisor or affiliates or other related entities of the Advisor; as a result, in any such transaction, we may not have the benefit of arm’s length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties and we may incur additional expenses.

We may enter into transactions with the Advisor or with affiliates or other related entities of the Advisor. For example, we may purchase assets from affiliates or other related entities of the Advisor that they currently own or hereafter acquire from third parties. The Advisor may also cause us to enter into a joint venture with its affiliates or to dispose of an interest in a property to its affiliates. We may also purchase properties developed and completed by affiliates of the Advisor or provide loans for the development of properties being developed by affiliates of the Advisor. The Advisor and/or its management team could experience a conflict in representing our interests in these transactions. In any such transaction, we will not have the benefit of arm’s length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties and may receive terms that are less beneficial to us than if such transactions were with a third party. In addition, our independent directors may request that independent legal counsel be provided to them on any matter in which they deem such counsel appropriate or necessary. If the independent directors request independent legal counsel, we will pay the cost of such counsel, which could reduce the cash available to us for other purposes, including paying distributions to our stockholders.

We depend on the Advisor and its key personnel; if any of such key personnel were to cease employment with the Advisor or its affiliates, our business could suffer.

Our ability to make distributions and achieve our investment objectives is dependent upon the performance of the Advisor in the acquisition, disposition and management of our investments, the selection of customers for our properties, the determination of any financing arrangements and other factors. In addition, our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of certain of the Advisor’s key personnel, including, in alphabetical order, Rajat Dhanda, David M. Fazekas, Andrea L. Karp, Brian R. Lange, Thomas G. McGonagle, Dwight L. Merriman III, Lainie P. Minnick, James R. Mulvihill, Taylor M. Paul, Scott W. Recknor, Scott A. Seager, Jeffrey W. Taylor, J. R. Wetzel, Joshua J. Widoff and Evan H. Zucker, each of whom would be difficult to replace. We currently do not have, nor do we expect to obtain, key man life insurance on any of the Advisor’s key personnel. If the Advisor were to lose the benefit of the experience, efforts and abilities of one or more of these individuals through their resignation, retirement, or due to an internalization transaction effected by another investment program sponsored by the Sponsor or its affiliates, or due to such individual or individuals becoming otherwise unavailable because of other activities on behalf of the Sponsor or its affiliates, our operating results could suffer.

The fees we pay to entities sponsored or advised by affiliates of our Sponsor in connection with our offerings of securities and in connection with the management of our investments were not determined on an arm’s-length basis, and therefore, we do not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties.

The Advisor, affiliates of the Advisor and the Dealer Manager have earned and will continue to earn fees, performance allocations, commissions and expense reimbursements from us. The fees, performance allocations, commissions and expense reimbursements paid and to be paid to the Advisor, affiliates of the Advisor and the Dealer Manager for services they provided us in connection with past offerings and in connection with our public offering were not determined on an arm’s-length basis. As a result, the fees have been determined without the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties.

We compete with entities sponsored or advised by affiliates of the Sponsor, for whom affiliates of the Sponsor provide certain advisory or management services, for opportunities to acquire or sell investments, and for customers, which may have an adverse impact on our operations.

We compete with existing entities sponsored or advised by affiliates of the Sponsor and may compete with any such entity created in the future, as well as entities for whom affiliates of the Sponsor provide certain advisory or management services, for opportunities to acquire, lease, finance or sell certain types of properties. We may also buy, finance or sell properties at the same time as these entities are buying,

42

financing or selling properties. In this regard, there is a risk that we will purchase a property that provides lower returns to us than a property purchased by entities sponsored or advised by affiliates of the Sponsor and entities for whom affiliates of the Sponsor provide certain advisory or management services. Certain entities sponsored or advised by affiliates of the Sponsor own and/or manage properties in geographical areas in which we expect to own properties. Therefore, our properties may compete for customers with other properties owned and/or managed by these entities. The Advisor may face conflicts of interest when evaluating customer leasing opportunities for our properties and other properties owned and/or managed by these entities and these conflicts of interest may have a negative impact on our ability to attract and retain customers.

The Sponsor and the Advisor have implemented lease allocation guidelines to assist with the process of the allocation of leases when we and certain other entities to which affiliates of the Advisor are providing certain advisory services have potentially competing properties with respect to a particular customer. Pursuant to the lease allocation guidelines, if we have an opportunity to bid on a lease with a prospective customer and one or more of these other entities has a potentially competing property, then, under certain circumstances, we may not be permitted to bid on the opportunity and in other circumstances, we and the other entities will be permitted to participate in the bidding process. The lease allocation guidelines are overseen by a joint management committee consisting of our Combined Industrial Advisors committee and certain other management representatives associated with other entities to which affiliates of the Advisor are providing similar services.

Because affiliates of the Sponsor and the Advisor currently sponsor and in the future may advise other investment vehicles (each, an “Investment Vehicle”) with overlapping investment objectives, strategies and criteria, potential conflicts of interest may arise with respect to industrial real estate investment opportunities (“Industrial Investments”). In order to manage this potential conflict of interest, in allocating Industrial Investments among the Investment Vehicles, the Sponsor follows an allocation policy (the “Allocation Policy”) which currently provides that if the Sponsor or one of its affiliates is awarded and controls an Industrial Investment that is suitable for more than one Investment Vehicle, based upon various Allocation Factors (defined below), including without limitation availability of capital, portfolio objectives, diversification goals, target investment markets, return requirements, investment timing and the Investment Vehicle’s applicable approval discretion and timing, then the Industrial Investment will be allocated to Investment Vehicles on a rotational basis and will be offered to the Investment Vehicle at the top of the rotation list (that is, the Investment Vehicle that has gone the longest without being allocated an Industrial Investment). If an Investment Vehicle on the list declines the Industrial Investment, it will be rotated to the bottom of the rotation list. Exceptions may be made to the Allocation Policy for (x) transactions necessary to accommodate an exchange pursuant to Section 1031 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), or (y) characteristics of a particular Industrial Investment or Investment Vehicle, such as adjacency to an existing asset, legal, regulatory or tax concerns or benefits, portfolio balancing or other Allocation Factors listed below, which make the Industrial Investment more advantageous to one of the Investment Vehicles. In addition, the Sponsor may from time to time specify that it will not seek new allocations for more than one Investment Vehicle until certain minimum allocation levels are reached.

The Sponsor may from time to time grant to certain Investment Vehicles certain exclusivity, rotation or other priority (each, a “Special Priority”) with respect to Industrial Investments or other investment opportunities. Current existing Special Priorities have been granted to (i) Build-to-Core Industrial Partnership III LLC (“BTC III”), pursuant to which BTC III will be presented one out of every five qualifying value-add Industrial Investments (subject to the terms and conditions of the BTC III partnership agreement) until such time as the capital commitments on or prior to February 26, 2021 have been called or committed, and one out of every three qualifying development Industrial Investments (subject to the terms and conditions of the BTC III partnership agreement) until such time as capital commitments thereunder have been fully committed: (ii) Black Creek Industrial Fund LP (“BCIF”) pursuant to which BCIF will be presented one out of every three potential development Industrial Investments, one out of every five potential value-add Industrial Investments, and one out of every three potential core Industrial Investments (subject to terms and conditions of the BCIF partnership agreement) until such time as capital commitments accepted by BCIF on or prior to March 31, 2020 have been called or committed,: and (iii) the BTC II Partnership pursuant to which the BTC II Partnership will be presented one out of every three qualifying development Industrial Investments (subject to terms and conditions of the BTC II Partnership agreement) until such time as capital commitments thereunder have been fully committed; provided, however, that if BTC II declines such qualifying opportunity, then we will have the option to retain the opportunity on our own. The Sponsor or its affiliates may grant additional special priorities in the future and from time to time. In addition, to the extent that a potential conflict of interest arises with respect to an investment opportunity other than an Industrial Investment, the Sponsor currently expects to manage the potential conflict of interest by allocating the investment in accordance with the principles of the Allocation Policy the Sponsor follows with respect to Industrial Investments.

43

“Allocation Factors” are those factors that the Sponsor maintains and updates from time to time based on review by the Sponsor’s Head of Real Estate. Current examples of Allocation Factors include:

● Overall investment objectives, strategy and criteria, including product type and style of investing (for example, core, core plus, value-add and opportunistic);

● The general real property sector or debt investment allocation targets of each program and any targeted geographic concentration;

● The cash requirements of each program;

● The strategic proximity of the investment opportunity to other assets;

● The effect of the acquisition on diversification of investments, including by type of property, geographic area, customers, size and risk;

● The policy of each program relating to leverage of investments;

● The effect of the acquisition on loan maturity profile;

● The effect on lease expiration profile;

● Customer concentration;

● The effect of the acquisition on ability to comply with any restrictions on investments and indebtedness contained in applicable governing documents, SEC filings, contracts or applicable law or regulation;

● The effect of the acquisition on the applicable entity’s intention not to be subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act;

● Legal considerations, such as Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”) and Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (“FIRPTA”), that may be applicable to specific investment platforms;

● The financial attributes of the investment opportunity;

● Availability of financing;

● Cost of capital;

● Ability to service any debt associated with the investment opportunity;

● Risk return profiles;

● Targeted distribution rates;

● Anticipated future pipeline of suitable investments;

● Expected holding period of the investment opportunity and the applicable entity’s remaining term;

● Whether the applicable entity still is in its fundraising and acquisition stage, or has substantially invested the proceeds from its fundraising stage;

● Whether the applicable entity was formed for the purpose of making a particular type of investment;

44

● Affiliate and/or related party considerations;

● The anticipated cash flow of the applicable entity and the asset;

● Tax effects of the acquisition, including on REIT or partnership qualifications;

● The size of the investment opportunity; and

● The amount of funds available to each program and the length of time such funds have been available for investment.

The Sponsor may modify its overall allocation policies from time to time. Any changes to the Sponsor’s allocation policies will be timely reported to our Conflicts Resolution Committee. The Advisor will be required to provide information to our board of directors on a quarterly basis to enable our board of directors, including the independent directors, to determine whether such policies are being fairly applied.

If we invest in joint venture or co-ownership arrangements with the Advisor or its affiliates, they may retain significant control over our investments even if our independent directors terminate the Advisor.

While a majority of our independent directors may terminate the Advisor upon 60 days’ written notice, our ability to remove co-general partners or advisors to any entities in which the Advisor or its affiliates serve in such capacities and in which we may serve as general partner or manager is limited. As a result, if we invest in such joint-venture or co-ownership arrangements; an affiliate of the Advisor may continue to maintain a substantial degree of control over our investments despite the termination of the Advisor.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR TAXATION AS A REIT

Failure to qualify as a REIT could adversely affect our operations and our ability to make distributions.

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2017 and we intend to continue to operate in accordance with the requirements for qualification as a REIT. Although we do not intend to request a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) as to our REIT status, we have received the opinion of our special U.S. federal income tax counsel, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, with respect to our qualification as a REIT. This opinion was issued in connection with our public offering. Investors should be aware, however, that opinions of counsel are not binding on the IRS or on any court. The opinion of Morrison & Foerster, LLP represents only the view of our counsel based on our counsel’s review and analysis of existing law and on certain representations as to factual matters and covenants made by us, including representations relating to the values of our assets, the sources of our income, the amount of distributions that we pay, the composition of our stockholders, and various other matters relating to the requirements for qualification as a REIT. Morrison & Foerster, LLP has no obligation to advise us or the holders of our common stock of any subsequent change in the matters stated, represented or assumed in its opinion or of any subsequent change in applicable law. Furthermore, both the validity of the opinion of Morrison & Foerster, LLP and our qualification as a REIT will depend on our satisfaction of numerous requirements (some on an annual and quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex provisions of the Code, for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations, and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. The complexity of these provisions and of the applicable income tax regulations that have been promulgated under the Code is greater in the case of a REIT that holds its assets through a partnership, as we do. Moreover, no assurance can be given that legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions will not change the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT or the U.S. federal income tax consequences of that qualification.

If we were to fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income at corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we lose our REIT status. Losing our REIT status would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions to stockholders would no longer be deductible in computing our taxable income and we would no longer be required to make distributions. However, any distributions made would be subject to the favorable tax rate applied to “qualified dividend income.” To the extent that distributions had been made in anticipation of our qualifying as a REIT, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order to pay the applicable corporate income tax. In addition, although we intend to operate in such a manner as to qualify as a REIT, it is possible that future economic, market, legal, tax or

45

other considerations may cause our board of directors to determine that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to be qualified as a REIT and recommend that we revoke our REIT election.

We believe that the Operating Partnership will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a partnership and not as an association or as a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation. If the IRS successfully determines that the Operating Partnership should be treated as a corporation, the Operating Partnership would be required to pay U.S. federal income tax at corporate rates on its net income, its partners would be treated as stockholders of the Operating Partnership and distributions to partners would constitute distributions that would not be deductible in computing the Operating Partnership’s taxable income. In addition, if the Operating Partnership were treated as a corporation, we could fail to qualify as a REIT, with the resulting consequences described above.

To qualify as a REIT, we must meet annual distribution requirements, which may result in us distributing amounts that may otherwise be used for our operations.

To obtain the favorable tax treatment accorded to REITs, in addition to other qualification requirements, we normally will be required each year to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which may not equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP), determined without regard to the deduction for distributions paid and by excluding net capital gains. We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our undistributed taxable income and net capital gain and to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which distributions we pay with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. These requirements could cause us to distribute amounts that otherwise would be invested in acquisitions of properties and it is possible that we might be required to borrow funds or sell assets to fund these distributions. It is possible that we might not always be able to continue to make distributions sufficient to meet the annual distribution requirements required to maintain our REIT status, avoid corporate tax on undistributed income and/or avoid the 4% excise tax.

From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our income for financial reporting purposes, or differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash may occur. If we do not have other funds available in these situations, we could be required to borrow funds on unfavorable terms, sell investments at disadvantageous prices or distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future acquisitions to make distributions sufficient to enable us to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our equity. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to grow, which could adversely affect our value.

Recharacterization of sale-leaseback transactions may cause us to lose our REIT status.

We may purchase properties and lease them back to the sellers of such properties. There can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge our characterization of any such sale-leaseback transaction as a “true lease.” In the event that any such sale-leaseback transaction is challenged and successfully recharacterized as a financing or loan for U.S. federal income tax purposes, deductions for depreciation and cost recovery relating to such property would be disallowed. If a sale-leaseback transaction were so recharacterized, we might fail to satisfy the REIT qualification “asset tests,” the “income tests” or the “distribution requirements” and, consequently, lose our REIT status effective with the year of recharacterization. Alternatively, the amount of our REIT taxable income could be recalculated which might also cause us to fail to meet the distribution requirement for a taxable year in the event we cannot make a sufficient deficiency distribution.

Our stockholders may have current tax liability on distributions if they elect to reinvest in shares of our common stock.

Stockholders who elect to participate in the distribution reinvestment plan, and who are subject to U.S. federal income taxation laws, will incur a tax liability on an amount equal to the fair market value on the relevant distribution date of the shares of our common stock purchased with reinvested distributions, to the extent such distribution is properly treated as being paid out of “earnings and profits,” even though such stockholders have elected not to receive the distributions used to purchase those shares of common stock in cash. As a result, each of our stockholders that is not a tax-exempt entity may have to use funds from other sources to pay such tax liability on the value of the common stock received.

46

Distributions payable by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates that apply to other corporate distributions.

The maximum tax rate applicable to income from “qualified dividends” payable to U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates is currently 20% plus a 3.8% “Medicare tax” surcharge. Distributions payable by REITs, however, generally continue to be taxed at the normal rate applicable to the individual recipient on ordinary income, rather than the 20% preferential rate and are also subject to the 3.8% Medicare tax; provided however, that all such distributions (other than distributions designated as capital gain distributions and distributions traceable to distributions from a taxable REIT subsidiary), which are received by a pass-through entity or an individual, are eligible for a 20% deduction from gross income under the current tax laws that will expire if not extended at the end of 2025. The more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate distributions could cause investors who are individuals to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay distributions, which could adversely affect the value of our common stock.

In certain circumstances, we may be subject to federal and state income taxes as a REIT, which would reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we may be subject to U.S. federal income taxes or state taxes. For example, net income from a “prohibited transaction” will be subject to a 100% tax. We may not be able to make sufficient distributions to avoid excise taxes applicable to REITs. We may also decide to retain income we earn from the sale or other disposition of our properties and pay income tax directly on such income. In that event, our stockholders would be treated as if they had earned that income and paid the tax on it directly, would be eligible to receive a credit or refund of the taxes deemed paid on the income deemed earned, and shall increase the adjusted basis of its shares by the excess of such deemed income over the amount of taxes deemed paid. However, stockholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability. We may also be subject to state and local taxes on our income or property, either directly or at the level of the companies through which we indirectly own our assets. Any U.S. federal or state taxes we pay will reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Distributions to tax-exempt investors may be classified as unrelated business taxable income.

Neither ordinary nor capital gain distributions with respect to our common stock, or gain from the sale of common stock should generally constitute unrelated business taxable income to a tax-exempt investor. However, there are certain exceptions to this rule. In particular:

● Part of the income and gain recognized by certain qualified employee pension trusts with respect to our common stock may be treated as unrelated business taxable income if shares of our common stock are predominately held by qualified employee pension trusts, and we are required to rely on a special look-through rule for purposes of meeting one of the REIT share ownership tests, and we are not operated in a manner to avoid treatment of such income or gain as unrelated business taxable income;

● Part of the income and gain recognized by a tax-exempt investor with respect to our common stock would constitute unrelated business taxable income if the investor incurs debt in order to acquire the common stock; and

● Part or all of the income or gain recognized with respect to our common stock by social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts and qualified group legal services plans which are exempt from federal income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7), (9), (17), or (20) of the Code may be treated as unrelated business taxable income.

Investments in other REITs and real estate partnerships could subject us to the tax risks associated with the tax status of such entities.

We may invest in the securities of other REITs and real estate partnerships. Such investments are subject to the risk that any such REIT or partnership may fail to satisfy the requirements to qualify as a REIT or a partnership, as the case may be, in any given taxable year. In the case of a REIT, such failure would subject such entity to taxation as a corporation, may require such REIT to incur indebtedness to pay its tax liabilities, may reduce its ability to make distributions to us, and may render it ineligible to elect REIT status prior to the fifth taxable year following the year in which it fails to so qualify. In the case of a partnership, such failure could subject such partnership to an entity level tax and reduce the entity’s ability to make distributions to us. In addition, such failures could, depending on the circumstances, jeopardize our ability to qualify as a REIT.

47

Complying with the REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.

To qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of shares of our common stock. We may be required to forego attractive investments. We also may be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

Complying with the REIT requirements may force us to liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

To qualify as a REIT, we must ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets. The remainder of our investments (other than governmental securities and qualified real estate assets) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 20% of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct such failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter to avoid losing our REIT status and suffering adverse tax consequences or, generally, must have “reasonable cause” for the failure and pay a penalty, in addition to satisfying such requirements. As a result, we may be required to liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

The stock ownership limit imposed by the Code for REITs and our charter may restrict our business combination opportunities.

To qualify as a REIT under the Code, not more than 50% in value of our outstanding stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities) at any time during the last half of each taxable year after our first year in which we qualify as a REIT. Our charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes our board of directors to take the actions that are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT. Unless an exemption is granted by our board of directors, no person (as defined to include entities) may own more than 9.8% in value of our capital stock or more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our common stock. In addition, our charter generally prohibits beneficial or constructive ownership of shares of our capital stock by any person that owns, actually or constructively, an interest in any of our lessees that would cause us to own, actually or constructively, 10% or more of any of our lessees. Our board of directors may grant an exemption, prospectively or retroactively, in its sole discretion, subject to such conditions, representations and undertakings as it may determine. These ownership limitations in our charter are common in REIT charters and are intended, among other purposes, to assist us in complying with the tax law requirements and to minimize administrative burdens. However, these ownership limits might also delay or prevent a transaction or a change in our control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.

The failure of a mezzanine loan to qualify as a real estate asset could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.

The IRS has issued Revenue Procedure 2003-65, which provides a safe harbor pursuant to which a mezzanine loan that is secured by interests in a pass-through entity will be treated by the IRS as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT 75% asset test, and interest derived from such loan will be treated as qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the REIT 75% income test. Although the Revenue Procedure provides a safe harbor on which taxpayers may rely, it does not prescribe rules of substantive tax law. We may make investments in loans secured by interests in pass-through entities in a manner that complies with the various requirements applicable to our qualification as a REIT. To the extent, however, that any such loans do not satisfy all of the requirements for reliance on the safe harbor set forth in the Revenue Procedure, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the tax treatment of such loans, which could jeopardize our ability to qualify as a REIT.

Liquidation of assets may jeopardize our REIT status.

To qualify as a REIT, we must comply with requirements regarding our assets and our sources of income. If we are compelled to liquidate our investments to satisfy our obligations to our lenders, we may be unable to comply with these requirements, ultimately jeopardizing our status as a REIT, or we may be subject to a 100% tax on any resultant gain if we sell assets that are treated as dealer property or inventory.

48

Changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws, including the enactment of certain tax reform measures, could have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.

In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made to the U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to investments in real estate and REITs, including the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Federal legislation intended to ameliorate the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, or the CARES Act, has been enacted that makes technical corrections to, or modifies on a temporary basis, certain of the provisions of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017, and it is possible that additional such legislation may be enacted in the future. The full impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 and the CARES Act may not become evident for some period of time.  In addition, there can be no assurance that future changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws or regulatory changes will not be proposed or enacted that could impact our business and financial results. The REIT rules are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Treasury Department, which may result in revisions to regulations and interpretations in addition to statutory changes. If enacted, certain of such changes could have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.

We cannot predict whether, when or to what extent any new U.S. federal tax laws, regulations, interpretations or rulings will impact the real estate investment industry or REITs. Prospective investors are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the effect of potential future changes to the federal tax laws on an investment in our shares.

Foreign investors may be subject to FIRPTA on the sale of common stock if we are unable to qualify as a domestically controlled REIT.

A foreign person (other than a “qualified foreign pension plan”) disposing of a U.S. real property interest, including shares of a U.S. corporation whose assets consist principally of U.S. real property interests, is generally subject to a tax under FIRPTA on the gain recognized on the disposition. FIRPTA does not apply, however, to the disposition of stock in a REIT if the REIT is a “domestically controlled REIT.” A domestically controlled REIT is a REIT in which, at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in value of its shares is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. holders. There can be no assurance that we will qualify as a domestically controlled REIT. If we were to fail to so qualify, gain realized by a foreign investor (other than a “qualified foreign pension plan”) on a sale of our common stock would be subject to FIRPTA unless our common stock was traded on an established securities market and the foreign investor did not at any time during a specified testing period directly or indirectly own more than 5% (10% after December 18, 2015) of the value of our outstanding common stock. We are not currently traded on an established securities market.

We may enter into certain hedging transactions which may have a potential impact on our REIT status.

From time to time, we may enter into hedging transactions with respect to one or more of our assets or liabilities. Our hedging activities may include entering into interest rate and/or foreign currency swaps, caps, and floors, options to purchase these items, and futures and forward contracts. Income and gain from “hedging transactions” that we enter into to hedge indebtedness incurred or to be incurred to acquire or carry real estate assets and that are clearly and timely identified as such will be excluded from both the numerator and the denominator for purposes of the gross income and asset tests that apply to REITs. Moreover, any income from a transaction entered into primarily to manage risk of currency fluctuations with respect to any item of income that would be qualifying REIT income under the REIT gross income tests, and any gain from the unwinding of any such transaction, does not constitute gross income for purposes of the REIT annual gross income tests. To the extent that we do not properly identify such transactions as hedges or we hedge with other types of financial instruments, or hedge other types of indebtedness, the income from those transactions may not be treated as qualifying income for purposes of the REIT gross income tests, and might also give rise to an asset that does not qualify for purposes of the REIT asset tests.

INVESTMENT COMPANY RISKS

We are not registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, and therefore we will not be subject to the requirements imposed on an investment company by the Investment Company Act which may limit or otherwise affect our investment choices.

The Company, the Operating Partnership, and our subsidiaries intend to conduct our businesses so that we are not required to register as “investment companies” under the Investment Company Act. The operation of a business in a manner so as not to be subject to regulation as an investment company requires an analysis of and compliance with complex laws, regulations and SEC staff interpretations, not all of which are summarized herein. Although we could modify our business methods at any time, at the present time we focus our activities on

49

investments in real estate, buildings, and other assets that can be referred to as “sticks and bricks” and therefore we will not be an investment company under Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act. We also may invest in other real estate investments, such as real estate related securities, and will otherwise be considered to be in the real estate business.

Companies subject to the Investment Company Act are required to comply with a variety of substantive requirements such as requirements relating to:

● Limitations on the capital structure of the entity;

● Restrictions on certain investments;

● Prohibitions on transactions with affiliated entities; and

● Public reporting disclosures, record keeping, voting procedures, proxy disclosure and similar corporate governance rules and regulations.

These and other requirements are intended to provide benefits or protections to security holders of investment companies. Because we and our subsidiaries do not expect to be subject to these requirements, stockholders will not be entitled to these benefits or protections. It is our policy to operate in a manner that will not require us to register as an investment company, and we do not expect to register as an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act.

We do not expect that we, the Operating Partnership, or other subsidiaries will be an investment company because, if we have any securities that are considered to be investment securities held by an entity, then we will seek to ensure that holdings of investment securities in such entity will not exceed 40% of the total assets of that entity (on a consolidated basis) and that no such entity holds itself out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing in securities. If an entity were to hold investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of the entity’s total assets (on a consolidated basis), and no other exclusion from registration was available, that entity might be required to register as an investment company. In order to avoid such a result, we, the Operating Partnership, or a subsidiary may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell or we may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we may also have to forgo opportunities to acquire certain investments or interests in companies or entities that we would otherwise want to acquire, or acquire assets we might otherwise not select for purchase.

If the Company, the Operating Partnership or any subsidiary owns assets that qualify as “investment securities” and the value of such assets exceeds 40% of the value of its total assets (on a consolidated basis), the entity would be deemed to be an investment company absent another exclusion from the Investment Company Act. Certain of the subsidiaries that we may form in the future could seek to rely upon the exclusion provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C) of that Act, which is available for entities, among other things, “primarily engaged in the business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate.” This exclusion, as interpreted by the staff of the SEC, generally requires that at least 55% of an entity’s portfolio be comprised of qualifying interests and an additional 25% of the entity’s portfolio be comprised of real estate-related interests although this percentage may be reduced to the extent that more than 55% of the entity’s assets are invested in qualifying interests (as such terms have been interpreted by the staff of the SEC and no more than 20% of such entity’s total assets are invested in miscellaneous investments. Qualifying interests for this purpose include actual interests in real estate, certain mortgage loans and other assets as interpreted in a manner consistent with SEC staff guidance. We intend to treat as real estate-related interests those assets that do not qualify for treatment as qualifying interests, including any securities of companies primarily engaged in real estate businesses that are not within the scope of SEC staff positions and/or interpretations regarding qualifying interests and securities issued by pass-through entities of which substantially all of the assets consist of qualifying interests and/or real estate-related interests. Due to the factual nature of this test, we, the Operating Partnership, or a subsidiary may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell or may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain, if we deem it necessary to remain in compliance with the foregoing standards. In addition, we may have to forgo opportunities to acquire certain investments or interests in companies or entities that we would otherwise want to acquire, or acquire assets we might otherwise not select for purchase, if we deem it necessary to remain in compliance with the foregoing standards.

In addition, we, the Operating Partnership and/or our subsidiaries may rely upon other exclusions, including the exclusion provided by Section 3(c)(6) of the Investment Company Act (which excludes, among other things, parent entities whose primary business is conducted through majority-owned subsidiaries relying upon the exclusion provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C), discussed above), from the definition of an investment company and the registration requirements under the Investment Company Act.

50

There can be no assurance that the laws and regulations governing the Investment Company Act status of REITs (and/or their subsidiaries), including actions by the SEC or its staff providing more specific or different guidance regarding these exclusions, will not change in a manner that adversely affects our operations. For example, on August 31, 2011, the SEC issued a concept release requesting comments regarding a number of matters relating to the exclusion provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act, including the nature of assets that qualify for purposes of the exclusion and whether mortgage REITs should be regulated in a manner similar to investment companies. To the extent that the SEC or the SEC staff provides more specific guidance regarding any of the matters bearing upon the exclusions discussed above or other exclusions from the definition of an investment company under the Investment Company Act upon which we may rely, we may be required to change the way we conduct our business or adjust our strategy accordingly. Any additional guidance from the SEC staff could provide additional flexibility to us, or it could further inhibit our ability to pursue the strategies we have chosen. If we meet the definition of an investment company under the Investment Company Act and we fail to qualify for an exclusion therefrom, our ability to use leverage and other business strategies would be substantially reduced. Our business will be materially and adversely affected if we fail to qualify for an exemption or exclusion from regulation under the Investment Company Act.

If we or the Operating Partnership are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, the additional expenses and operational limitations associated with such registration may reduce our stockholders’ investment return or impair our ability to conduct our business as planned.

If we become an investment company or are otherwise required to register as an investment company, we might be required to revise some of our current policies, or substantially restructure our business, to comply with the Investment Company Act. This would likely require us to incur the expense and delay of holding a stockholder meeting to vote on proposals for such changes. Further, if we were required to register as an investment company, but failed to do so, we would be prohibited from engaging in our business, criminal and civil actions could be brought against us, some of our contracts might be unenforceable, unless a court were to direct enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business.

ERISA RISKS

If our assets are deemed to be ERISA plan assets, the Advisor and we may be exposed to liabilities under Title I of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code.

In some circumstances where an ERISA plan holds an interest in an entity, the assets of the entire entity are deemed to be ERISA plan assets unless an exception applies. This is known as the “look-through rule.” Under those circumstances, the obligations and other responsibilities of plan sponsors, plan fiduciaries and plan administrators, and of parties in interest and disqualified persons, under Title I of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code, as applicable, may be applicable, and there may be liability under these and other provisions of ERISA and the Code. We believe that our assets should not be treated as plan assets because the shares should qualify as “publicly-offered securities” that are exempt from the look-through rules under applicable Treasury Regulations. We note, however, that because certain limitations are imposed upon the transferability of shares so that we may qualify as a REIT, and perhaps for other reasons, it is possible that this exemption may not apply. If that is the case, and if the Advisor or we are exposed to liability under ERISA or the Code, our performance and results of operations could be adversely affected. Prior to making an investment in us, our stockholders should consult with their legal and other advisors concerning the impact of ERISA and the Code on their investment and our performance.

ITEM 1B.       UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

51

ITEM 2.        PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2020, we owned and managed, either directly or through our minority ownership interests in our joint venture partnerships (which are presented as if we own a 100% interest), a total real estate portfolio that included 132 industrial buildings totaling approximately 30.3 million square feet located in 23 markets throughout the U.S., with 205 customers, and was 84.9% occupied (87.8% leased) with a weighted-average remaining lease term (based on square feet) of approximately 4.7 years. The occupied rate reflects the square footage with a paying customer in place. The leased rate includes the occupied square footage and additional square footage with leases in place that have not yet commenced. Refer to “Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for detail regarding our 2020 acquisition activity. As of December 31, 2020, our total real estate portfolio included:

● 121 industrial buildings totaling approximately 28.2 million square feet comprised our operating portfolio, which includes stabilized properties, and was 91.0% occupied (94.2% leased) with a weighted-average remaining lease term (based on square feet) of approximately 4.7 years; and

● 11 industrial buildings totaling approximately 2.1 million square feet comprised our value-add portfolio, which includes buildings acquired with the intention to reposition or redevelop, or buildings recently completed which have not yet reached stabilization. We generally consider a building to be stabilized on the earlier to occur of the first anniversary of a building’s shell completion or a building achieving 90% occupancy.

Of our total portfolio, we owned and managed 67 buildings totaling approximately 17.5 million square feet through our minority ownership interests in our joint venture partnerships (as described in “Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements”). Our consolidated portfolio has an estimated aggregate weighted-average purchase price capitalization rate of approximately 4.4% (4.7% excluding contractual free rent during a portion of the year following acquisition of certain of the properties). In addition, as of December 31, 2020, through our minority joint venture partnerships, we owned and managed 16 buildings either under construction or in the pre-construction phase totaling approximately 5.1 million square feet. Unless otherwise noted, these buildings are excluded from the presentation of our portfolio data in the tables below. The purchase price capitalization rate is based on the property’s projected cash net operating income from in-place leases for the 12 months after the date of purchase, including any contractual rent increases contained in such leases for those 12 months, divided by the purchase price for the property, exclusive of transfer taxes, due diligence expenses and other closing costs including acquisition costs.

Through December 31, 2020, we had directly acquired 65 buildings comprised of approximately 12.8 million square feet for an aggregate total purchase price of approximately $1.4 billion, as well as the minority ownership interests in the two joint venture partnerships. Also, through our minority ownership interests in our joint venture partnerships, we completed the development of three industrial buildings comprising an aggregate of 1.0 million square feet and total costs to complete the development of approximately $91.7 million during the period from July 16, 2020 through December 31, 2020. We funded these acquisitions and development activity primarily with proceeds from our public offerings, institutional equity, and debt financings.

Unless otherwise indicated, the term “property” as used herein refers to one or more buildings in the same market that were acquired by us in the same transaction.

Building Types. Our industrial buildings consist primarily of warehouse distribution facilities suitable for single or multiple customers. The following table summarizes our portfolio by building type as of December 31, 2020:

		Percent of Rentable Square Feet
Building Type	Description	Total (1)		Consolidated (2)
Bulk distribution	Building size of 150,000 to over 1 million square feet, single or multi-customer	82.3	%	76.5	%
Light industrial	Building size of less than 150,000 square feet, single or multi-customer	17.7		23.5
		100.0	%	100.0	%

(1) Represents our total portfolio of owned and managed properties, including our consolidated and unconsolidated properties, as of December 31, 2020. Unconsolidated properties are those owned through our minority ownership interests in our joint venture partnerships. Properties owned through our joint venture partnerships are shown as if we owned a 100% interest. See “Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for more details on our joint venture partnerships.

(2) Represents only our consolidated properties.

52

Portfolio Overview and Market Diversification. As of December 31, 2020, the average effective annual rent of our total real estate portfolio (calculated by dividing total annualized base rent, which includes the impact of any contractual tenant concessions (cash basis), by total occupied square footage) was approximately $5.82 per square foot. The following table summarizes certain operating metrics of our portfolio by market as of December 31, 2020:

	Number of	Rentable Square Feet		Occupied		Leased		Annualized Base Rent (4)
($ and square feet in thousands)	Buildings (1)	Total (1)	Consolidated (2)	Rate (3)		Rate (3)		Total (1)				Consolidated (2)
Operating Properties:
Atlanta	9	2,383	—	78.5	%	78.5	%	$	8,275	5.5	%	$	—	—	%
Austin	6	562	119	90.4		93.9			3,826	2.6			836	1.2
Bay Area	3	845	—	67.7		89.3			6,267	4.2			—	—
Central Valley	3	1,454	382	78.3		78.3			6,560	4.4			2,291	3.4
Chicago	5	888	386	79.0		100.0			3,846	2.6			1,928	2.9
Cincinnati	2	294	294	100.0		100.0			1,408	0.9			1,408	2.1
Dallas	12	3,827	2,411	99.2		100.0			16,584	11.0			10,550	15.6
D.C. / Baltimore	4	570	463	100.0		100.0			4,811	3.2			3,795	5.6
Denver	1	152	152	100.0		100.0			685	0.5			685	1.0
Houston	2	487	—	82.4		82.4			2,003	1.3			—	—
Indianapolis	1	691	691	100.0		100.0			2,266	1.5			2,266	3.4
Las Vegas	5	851	851	98.2		98.2			5,857	3.9			5,857	8.7
New Jersey	12	2,313	1,107	97.9		97.9			15,527	10.4			6,722	10.0
Orlando	2	441	441	100.0		100.0			2,531	1.7			2,531	3.8
Pennsylvania	15	3,395	1,464	82.9		92.1			15,677	10.5			8,513	12.7
Portland	1	160	—	100.0		100.0			1,340	0.9			—	—
Reno	6	1,422	1,422	100.0		100.0			6,960	4.6			6,960	10.4
Salt Lake City	1	384	384	100.0		100.0			1,993	1.3			1,993	3.0
San Antonio	5	588	—	100.0		100.0			2,950	2.0			—	—
San Diego	2	268	—	100.0		100.0			2,275	1.5			—	—
Seattle	3	1,341	—	79.3		79.3			8,105	5.4			—	—
South Florida	3	289	282	100.0		100.0			2,200	1.5			1,940	2.9
Southern California	18	4,592	1,256	96.7		100.0			27,506	18.3			8,444	12.6
Total operating	121	28,197	12,105	91.0		94.2			149,452	99.7			66,719	99.3
Value-Add Properties:
Atlanta	1	138	138	—		—			—	—			—	—
Cincinnati	1	161	161	58.1		58.1			474	0.3			474	0.7
Houston	1	140	140	—		—			—	—			—	—
Las Vegas	2	267	266	—		—			—	—			—	—
New Jersey	2	648	—	—		—			—	—			—	—
Pennsylvania	1	149	—	—		—			—	—			—	—
Seattle	1	205	—	—		—			—	—			—	—
South Florida	2	436	—	—		—			—	—			—	—
Total value-add properties	11	2,144	705	4.4		4.4			474	0.3			474	0.7
Total portfolio	132	30,341	12,810	84.9	%	87.8	%	$	149,926	100.0	%	$	67,193	100.0	%

(1) Represents our total portfolio of owned and managed properties, including our consolidated and unconsolidated properties, as of December 31, 2020. Unconsolidated properties are those owned through our minority ownership interests in our joint venture partnerships. Properties owned through our joint venture partnerships are shown as if we owned a 100% interest. See “Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for more details on our joint venture partnerships.

(2) Represents only our consolidated properties.

(3) The occupied rate reflects the square footage with a paying customer in place. The leased rate includes the occupied square footage and additional square footage with leases in place that have not yet commenced.

(4) Annualized base rent is calculated as monthly base rent including the impact of any contractual tenant concessions (cash basis) per the terms of the lease as of December 31, 2020, multiplied by 12.

Lease Terms. Our industrial properties are typically subject to leases on a “triple net basis,” in which customers pay their proportionate share of real estate taxes, insurance, common area maintenance, and certain other operating costs. In addition, most of our leases include fixed rental increases or Consumer Price Index-based rental increases. Lease terms typically range from one to 10 years, and often include renewal options.

53

Lease Expirations. As of December 31, 2020, the weighted-average remaining lease term (based on square feet) of our total occupied portfolio was approximately 4.7 years, excluding renewal options. The following table summarizes the lease expirations of our occupied portfolio for leases in place as of December 31, 2020, without giving effect to the exercise of renewal options or termination rights, if any:

		Occupied Square Feet						Annualized Base Rent (3)
($ and square feet in thousands)	Number of Leases (1)	Total (1)			Consolidated (2)			Total (1)				Consolidated (2)
2021	26	1,393	5.4	%	964	8.0	%	$	7,701	5.2	%	$	5,309	7.9	%
2022	33	2,678	10.5		1,547	12.8			13,236	8.9			7,641	11.4
2023	35	3,602	14.1		1,720	14.2			21,348	14.3			10,361	15.4
2024	34	3,440	13.4		1,269	10.5			19,264	12.9			7,075	10.5
2025	29	3,943	15.4		2,511	20.8			22,149	14.8			12,897	19.2
2026	23	2,899	11.3		498	4.1			17,540	11.7			3,557	5.3
2027	12	2,367	9.2		1,417	11.7			12,747	8.5			8,225	12.2
2028	9	1,506	5.9		332	2.7			8,542	5.7			2,146	3.2
2029	15	2,209	8.6		1,342	11.1			14,065	9.4			7,691	11.4
Thereafter	9	1,574	6.2		488	4.1			12,708	8.6			2,291	3.5
Total occupied (4)	225	25,611	100.0	%	12,088	100.0	%	$	149,300	100.0	%	$	67,193	100.0	%

(1) Represents our total portfolio of owned and managed properties, including our consolidated and unconsolidated properties, as of December 31, 2020. Unconsolidated properties are those owned through our minority ownership interests in our joint venture partnerships. Properties owned through our joint venture partnerships are shown as if we owned a 100% interest. See “Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for more details on our joint venture partnership.

(2) Represents only our consolidated properties.

(3) Annualized base rent is calculated as monthly base rent including the impact of any contractual tenant concessions (cash basis) per the terms of the lease as of December 31, 2020, multiplied by 12.

(4) Excludes one lease of 0.1 million square feet that expired on December 31, 2020.

Customer Diversification. As of December 31, 2020, there was one customer that individually represented more than 5.0% of total occupied square feet of our total portfolio and one customer that individually represented more than 5.0% of total annualized base rent of our total portfolio. The following table reflects the 10 largest customers of our total portfolio, based on annualized base rent, which occupied a combined 7.9 million square feet as of December 31, 2020:

	% of Total		% of Total
Customer	Occupied Square Feet (1)		Annualized Base Rent (1)
Amazon.com Services LLC	5.3	%	7.6	%
Steelcase, Inc.	4.8		4.7
XPO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc.	4.4		4.2
Radial, Inc.	4.5		3.4
National Distribution Centers, LLC	3.4		2.9
SBS Transportation, Inc.	1.7		2.2
The Kroger Company	1.9		1.8
Clutter, Inc.	1.8		1.7
General Services Administration	1.0		1.6
Patagonia, Inc.	1.8		1.6
Total	30.6	%	31.7	%

(1) Represents our total portfolio of owned and managed properties, including our consolidated and unconsolidated properties, as of December 31, 2020. Unconsolidated properties are those owned through our minority ownership interests in our joint venture partnerships. Properties owned through our joint venture partnerships are shown as if we owned a 100% interest. See “Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for more details on our joint venture partnerships.

54

As of December 31, 2020, there were two customers that individually represented more than 5.0% of total occupied square feet of our consolidated portfolio and one customer that individually represented more than 5.0% of total annualized base rent of our consolidated portfolio. The following table reflects the 10 largest customers of our consolidated portfolio, based on annualized base rent, which occupied a combined 4.7 million square feet as of December 31, 2020:

	% of Total		% of Total
Customer	Occupied Square Feet (1)		Annualized Base Rent (1)
Radial, Inc.	9.7	%	7.6	%
Steelcase, Inc.	5.1		4.9
The Kroger Company	4.0		4.0
General Services Administration	2.2		3.7
Patagonia, Inc.	3.9		3.6
Boyd Flotation, Inc.	2.6		3.1
Amazon.com Services LLC	3.2		3.0
Hooker Furniture Corporation	2.7		2.4
Motivating Graphics, LLC	3.0		2.4
Dayton Parts, LLC	2.6		2.3
Total	39.0	%	37.0	%

(1) Represents only our consolidated properties.

The majority of our customers do not have a public corporate credit rating. We evaluate creditworthiness and financial strength of prospective customers based on financial, operating and business plan information that is provided to us by such prospective customers, as well as other market, industry, and economic information that is generally publicly available.

Industry Diversification. The table below illustrates the diversification of our portfolio by industry classifications of our customers as of December 31, 2020:

		Occupied Square Feet							Annualized Base Rent (3)
($ and square feet in thousands)	Number of Leases (1)	Total (1)			Consolidated (2)				Total (1)				Consolidated (2)
eCommerce / Fulfillment	13	4,075	15.8	%		1,624	13.4	%	$	23,593	15.7	%	$	7,528	11.2	%
Transportation / Logistics	22	3,791	14.7			1,050	8.7			23,448	15.6			5,747	8.6
Home Furnishings	13	2,757	10.7			1,645	13.6			15,566	10.4			9,394	14.0
Food & Beverage	18	2,107	8.2			965	8.0			12,928	8.6			5,851	8.7
Auto	17	2,213	8.6			1,325	11.0			10,499	7.0			5,409	8.0
Storage / Warehousing	16	1,482	5.8			748	6.2			9,118	6.1			4,140	6.2
Home Improvement	17	859	3.3			450	3.7			5,504	3.7			2,863	4.3
Appliance	4	1,119	4.3			379	3.1			5,243	3.5			1,725	2.6
Printing	7	913	3.5			770	6.4			5,151	3.4			4,015	6.0
Manufacturing	12	945	3.7			202	1.7			5,113	3.4			1,189	1.8
Other	87	5,499	21.4			2,930	24.2			33,763	22.6			19,332	28.6
Total	226	25,760	100.0	%		12,088	100.0	%	$	149,926	100.0	%	$	67,193	100.0	%

(1) Represents our total portfolio of owned and managed properties, including our consolidated and unconsolidated properties, as of December 31, 2020. Unconsolidated properties are those owned through our minority ownership interests in our joint venture partnerships. Properties owned through our joint venture partnerships are shown as if we owned a 100% interest. See “Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for more details on our joint venture partnerships.

(2) Represents only our consolidated properties.

(3) Annualized base rent is calculated as monthly base rent including the impact of any contractual tenant concessions (cash basis) per the terms of the lease as of December 31, 2020, multiplied by 12.

Debt Obligations. Our consolidated indebtedness is currently comprised of borrowings under our term loan and mortgage notes. As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $582.8 million of consolidated indebtedness with a weighted-average interest rate of 2.49%, which includes the effect of interest rate swap agreements. The weighted-average remaining term of our consolidated debt as of December 31, 2020 was 4.0 years, excluding extension options. The total gross book value of properties encumbered by our total consolidated debt as of December 31, 2020 was $299.3 million. See “Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information.

55

ITEM 3.        LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

As of the date hereof, there are no material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or of which any of our properties are the subject.

ITEM 4.        MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

56

PART II

ITEM 5.        MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

There is no public trading market for our shares of common stock. On a limited basis, our stockholders may be able to have their shares redeemed through our share redemption program. In the future we may also consider various forms of additional liquidity, each of which we refer to as a “Liquidity Event,” including, but not limited to, a listing of our common stock on a national securities exchange (or the receipt by our stockholders of securities that are listed on a national securities exchange in exchange for our common stock); the sale, merger, or other transaction of our company in which our stockholders either receive, or have the option to receive, cash, securities redeemable for cash, and/or securities of a publicly traded company; and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets where our stockholders either receive, or have the option to receive, cash or other consideration. While we may consider a Liquidity Event, which may provide an additional source of value through the realization of capital appreciation, at any time in the future, we currently do not have a fixed time frame in which we intend to undertake such consideration and we are not obligated by our charter or otherwise to effect a liquidity event at any time.

In order to assist FINRA members and their associated persons that have participated in the offer and sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to our public offerings in their efforts to comply with NASD Conduct Rule 2340, we disclose in each annual report distributed to stockholders a per share estimated value of our common stock, the method by which it was developed, and the date of the data used to develop the estimated value. For a description of the risks associated with the determination of and reliance on a net investment value or an estimated NAV per share of our common stock, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Investing in Our Public Offering.”

We commenced calculating a NAV on June 15, 2018. The following table presents the high and low NAV per share of each class of common stock for each reported quarter within the two most recent fiscal years. Each class of common stock has had the same NAV.

Quarter	Low		High
2020
First Quarter	$	10.0056	$	10.0688
Second Quarter	$	10.0591	$	10.0629
Third Quarter	$	10.0595	$	10.0904
Fourth Quarter	$	10.0920	$	10.1437
2019
First Quarter	$	10.0497	$	10.0618
Second Quarter	$	10.0477	$	10.0583
Third Quarter	$	10.0326	$	10.0587
Fourth Quarter	$	10.0611	$	10.0763

Net Asset Value

Our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, has adopted valuation procedures, as amended from time to time, that contain a comprehensive set of methodologies to be used in connection with the calculation of our NAV. With the approval of our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, we have engaged Altus Group U.S., Inc., a third-party valuation firm, to serve as our independent valuation advisor (“Altus Group” or the “Independent Valuation Advisor”) with respect to providing monthly real property appraisals, reviewing annual third-party real property appraisals, reviewing the internal valuations of debt-related assets and liabilities performed by our Advisor, helping us administer the valuation process for the real properties in our portfolio, and assisting in the development and review of our valuation procedures. As part of this process, our Advisor reviews the estimates of the values of our real property portfolio, real estate-related assets, and other assets and liabilities within our portfolio for consistency with our valuation guidelines and the overall reasonableness of the valuation conclusions, and informs our board of directors of its conclusions. Although the Independent Valuation Advisor or other pricing sources may consider any comments received from us or our Advisor or other valuation sources for their individual valuations, the final estimated fair values of our real property assets are determined by the Independent Valuation Advisor and real estate-related assets and other assets and liabilities are determined by the applicable pricing source, subject to the oversight of our board of directors. With respect to the valuation of our real property assets, the Independent Valuation Advisor

57

provides our board of directors with periodic valuation reports and is available to meet with our board of directors to review valuation information, as well as our valuation guidelines and the operation and results of the valuation process generally. Unconsolidated real property assets held through joint ventures or partnerships are valued by such joint ventures or partnerships according to their valuation procedures. At least once per calendar year, each unconsolidated real property asset will be appraised by a third-party appraiser. If the valuation procedures of the applicable joint ventures or partnerships do not accommodate a monthly determination of the fair value of real property assets, we will determine the estimated fair value of the unconsolidated real property assets for those interim periods. All parties engaged by us in connection with the calculation of our NAV, including our Advisor, are subject to the oversight of our board of directors. Our board of directors has the right to engage additional valuation firms and pricing sources to review the valuation process or valuations, if deemed appropriate. At least once each calendar year our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, reviews the appropriateness of our valuation procedures with input from the Independent Valuation Advisor. From time to time our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, may adopt changes to the valuation procedures if it: (1) determines that such changes are likely to result in a more accurate reflection of NAV or a more efficient or less costly procedure for the determination of NAV without having a material adverse effect on the accuracy of such determination; or (2) otherwise reasonably believes a change is appropriate for the determination of NAV. We will publicly announce material changes to our valuation procedures or the identity or role of the Independent Valuation Advisor or ALPS Fund Services Inc. See Exhibit 99.2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more detailed description of our valuation procedures, including important disclosures regarding real property valuations provided by the Independent Valuation Advisor.

As used below, “Fund Interests” means our outstanding shares of common stock, along with the partnership units in our operating partnership (“OP Units”), which may be held directly or indirectly by the Advisor, the Sponsor, and third parties, and “Aggregate Fund NAV” means the NAV of all of the Fund Interests.

The following table sets forth the components of Aggregate Fund NAV as of December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020:

	As of
(in thousands)	December 31, 2020		September 30, 2020
Investments in industrial properties	$	1,453,200	$	1,294,100
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture partnerships		375,488		312,161
Cash and cash equivalents		232,369		180,683
Other assets		12,606		10,276
Line of credit, term loan and mortgage notes		(582,750)		(464,250)
Other liabilities		(43,248)		(26,328)
Accrued performance component of advisory fee		(9,640)		(6,195)
Accrued fixed component of advisory fee		(1,345)		(895)
Aggregate Fund NAV	$	1,436,680	$	1,299,552
Total Fund Interests outstanding		141,632		128,791

The following table sets forth the NAV per Fund Interest as of December 31, 2020:

(in thousands, except per Fund Interest data)	Total		Class T Shares		Class W Shares		Class I Shares		OP Units
Monthly NAV	$	1,436,680	$	1,324,422	$	79,789	$	28,808	$	3,661
Fund Interests outstanding		141,632		130,565		7,866		2,840		361
NAV Per Fund Interest	$	10.1437	$	10.1437	$	10.1437	$	10.1437	$	10.1437

The fair value of our assets and certain liabilities are calculated for purposes of determining our NAV per share using widely accepted methodologies and, as appropriate, the GAAP principles within the FASB Accounting Standards Codification under Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC Topic 820”). However, our valuation procedures and our NAV are not subject to GAAP and will not be subject to independent audit.

58

Our valuation procedures, which address specifically each category of our assets and liabilities and are applied separately to the preparation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP, involve adjustments from historical cost. There are certain factors which cause NAV to be different from net book value on a GAAP basis. Most significantly, the valuation of our real estate assets, which is the largest component of our NAV calculation, is provided to us by the Independent Valuation Advisor on a monthly basis. For GAAP purposes, these assets are generally recorded at depreciated or amortized cost. Other examples that will cause our NAV to differ from our GAAP net book value include the straight-lining of rent, which results in a receivable for GAAP purposes that is not included in the determination of our NAV. Third party appraisers may value our individual real estate assets using appraisal standards that deviate from fair value standards under GAAP. The use of such appraisal standards may cause our NAV to deviate from GAAP fair value principles. We did not develop our valuation procedures with the intention of complying with fair value concepts under GAAP and, therefore, there could be differences between our fair values and the fair values derived from the principal market or most advantageous market concepts of establishing fair value under GAAP.

Under GAAP, we record liabilities for ongoing distribution fees that (i) we currently owe under the terms of the dealer manager agreement and (ii) we estimate we may pay to the Dealer Manager in future periods for shares of our common stock. As of December 31, 2020, we estimated approximately $46.1 million of ongoing distribution fees were potentially payable to the Dealer Manager. We do not deduct the liability for estimated future distribution fees in our calculation of NAV since we intend for our NAV to reflect our estimated value on the date that we determine our NAV. Accordingly, our estimated NAV at any given time does not include consideration of any estimated future distribution fees that may become payable after such date.

Other liabilities as of December 31, 2020 include a $17.1 million liability to reimburse the Advisor for outstanding organization and offering expenses that the Advisor paid on behalf of the Company prior to December 31, 2020. Our board of directors determined to accelerate this reimbursement in December 2020, and we have since repaid the entire outstanding balance. Accordingly, we recognized the entire outstanding liability and expense in December for purposes of determining our December NAV. We reimbursed the Advisor in full in January 2021.

Investment in unconsolidated joint venture partnerships as of December 31, 2020 includes a minority interest discount on the real property valuation component of the unconsolidated joint venture valuations to account for the restricted salability or transferability of those real properties given our minority ownership interests in the BTC Partnerships. We estimate the fair value of our minority ownership interests in the BTC Partnerships as of December 31, 2020 would have been $48.3 million higher if a minority discount had not been applied, meaning that if we used the estimated fair value without the application of the minority discount, our NAV would have been higher by approximately $48.3 million, or $0.34 per share, not taking into account all of the other items that impact our monthly NAV, as of December 31, 2020.

We include no discounts to our NAV for the illiquid nature of our shares, including the limitations on our stockholders’ ability to redeem shares under our share redemption program and our ability to suspend or terminate our share redemption program at any time. Our NAV generally does not consider exit costs (e.g. selling costs and commissions related to the sale of a property) that would likely be incurred if our assets and liabilities were liquidated or sold today. While we may use market pricing concepts to value individual components of our NAV, our per share NAV is not derived from the market pricing information of open-end real estate funds listed on stock exchanges.

Our NAV is not a representation, warranty or guarantee that: (i) we would fully realize our NAV upon a sale of our assets; (ii) shares of our common stock would trade at our per share NAV on a national securities exchange; and (iii) a stockholder would be able to realize the per share NAV if such stockholder attempted to sell his or her shares to a third party.

The valuations of our real property as of December 31, 2020, were provided by the Independent Valuation Advisor in accordance with our valuation procedures. The aggregate real property valuation of $1.45 billion compares to a GAAP basis of real properties (net of intangible lease liabilities and before accumulated amortization and depreciation) of $1.38 billion, representing an increase of approximately $75.2 million, or 5.5%. Certain key assumptions that were used by the Independent Valuation Advisor in the discounted cash flow analysis are set forth in the following table:

	Weighted-Average Basis
Exit capitalization rate	5.3	%
Discount rate / internal rate of return	6.4	%
Average holding period (years)	10.0

59

A change in the exit capitalization and discount rates used would impact the calculation of the value of our real properties. For example, assuming all other factors remain constant, the changes listed below would result in the following effects on the value of our real properties:

		Increase (Decrease) to the
Input	Hypothetical Change	NAV of Real Properties
Exit capitalization rate (weighted-average)	0.25% decrease	3.3	%
	0.25% increase	(3.0)	%
Discount rate (weighted-average)	0.25% decrease	2.0	%
	0.25% increase	(2.0)	%

From November 1, 2017 through January 31, 2020, we valued our debt-related investments and real estate-related liabilities generally in accordance with fair value standards under GAAP. Beginning with our valuation for February 29, 2020, our property-level mortgages and corporate-level credit facilities that are intended to be held to maturity (which for fixed rate debt not subject to interest rate hedges may be the date near maturity at which time the debt will be eligible for prepayment at par for purposes herein), including those subject to interest rate hedges, were valued at par (i.e. at their respective outstanding balances). In addition, because we utilize interest rate hedges to stabilize interest payments (i.e. to fix all-in interest rates through interest rate swaps or to limit interest rate exposure through interest rate caps) on individual loans, each loan and associated interest rate hedge is treated as one financial instrument which is valued at par if intended to be held to maturity. This policy of valuing at par applies regardless of whether any given interest rate hedge is considered as an asset or liability for GAAP purposes. We currently estimate the fair value of our debt (inclusive of associated interest rate hedges) that was intended to be held to maturity as of December 31, 2020 was $13.4 million higher than par for such debt in aggregate, meaning that if we used the fair value of our debt rather than par (and treated the associated hedge as part of the same financial instrument), our NAV would be lower by approximately $13.4 million, or $0.09 per share, as of December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, we classified all of our debt as intended to be held to maturity. See “Performance” below for further information concerning the impact of interest rate movements on our share returns assuming we continue to include the mark-to-market adjustments for all borrowing-related interest rate hedge and debt instruments.

Performance

Our NAV increased from $10.0763 per share as of December 31, 2019 to $10.1437 per share as of December 31, 2020. The increase in NAV was primarily driven by the performance of our real estate portfolio, including the acquisition of 15 operating properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2020, for an aggregate purchase price of over $405.3 million, exclusive of due diligence expenses and other closing costs, as well as the acquisition of minority ownership interests in two joint venture partnerships for an aggregate purchase price of $301.0 million, partially offset by the repayment of organization and offering costs that were previously funded on behalf of the Company by the Advisor.

60

As noted above, effective February 29, 2020, our board of directors approved amendments to our valuation procedures which revised the way we value property-level mortgages, corporate-level credit facilities and associated interest rate hedges when loans, including associated interest rate hedges, are intended to be held to maturity, effectively eliminating all mark-to-market adjustments for such loans and hedges from the calculation of our NAV. The following table summarizes the impact of interest rate movements on our returns assuming we continued to include the mark-to-market adjustments for all borrowing-related interest rate hedge and debt instruments beginning with the February 29, 2020 NAV:

					One-Year		Since NAV
	Trailing				(Trailing		Inception
(as of December 31, 2020)	Three-Months (1)		Year-to-Date (1)		12-Months) (1)		Annualized (1)(2)(3)
Class T Share Total Return (with Sales Charge) (3)	(2.93)	%	0.49	%	0.49	%	3.49	%
Adjusted Class T Share Total Return (with Sales Charge) (continued inclusion of mark-to-market adjustments for borrowing-related interest rate hedge and debt instruments) (4)	(3.32)	%	(0.25)	%	(0.25)	%	3.25	%
Difference	0.39	%	0.74	%	0.74	%	0.24	%
Class T Share Total Return (without Sales Charge) (3)	1.64	%	5.22	%	5.22	%	5.01	%
Adjusted Class T Share Total Return (without Sales Charge) (continued inclusion of mark-to-market adjustments for borrowing-related interest rate hedge and debt instruments) (4)	1.23	%	4.45	%	4.45	%	4.76	%
Difference	0.41	%	0.77	%	0.77	%	0.25	%
Class W Share Total Return (3)	1.76	%	5.73	%	5.73	%	5.63	%
Adjusted Class W Share Total Return (continued inclusion of mark-to-market adjustments for borrowing-related interest rate hedge and debt instruments) (4)	1.35	%	4.96	%	4.96	%	5.31	%
Difference	0.41	%	0.77	%	0.77	%	0.32	%
Class I Share Total Return (3)	1.89	%	6.25	%	6.25	%	6.04	%
Adjusted Class I Share Total Return (continued inclusion of mark-to-market adjustments for borrowing-related interest rate hedge and debt instruments) (4)	1.48	%	5.47	%	5.47	%	5.79	%
Difference	0.41	%	0.78	%	0.78	%	0.25	%

(1) Performance is measured by total return, which includes income and appreciation (i.e., distributions and changes in NAV) and reinvestment of all distributions (“Total Return”) for the respective time period. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Performance data quoted above is historical. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. Actual individual stockholder returns will vary. The returns have been prepared using unaudited data and valuations of the underlying investments in our portfolio, which are estimates of fair value and form the basis for our NAV. Valuations based upon unaudited or estimated reports from the underlying investments may be subject to later adjustments or revisions, may not correspond to realized value and may not accurately reflect the price at which assets could be liquidated on any given day.

(2) The inception date for Class I shares and Class T shares was November 1, 2017, which is when shares of our common stock were first issued to third-party investors in our initial public offering. The inception date for Class W shares was July 2, 2018, which is when Class W shares of common stock were first issued to third-party investors.

(3) The Total Returns presented are based on the actual NAVs at which stockholders transacted, calculated pursuant to our valuation procedures. With respect to the “Class T Share Total Return (with Sales Charge),” the Total Returns are calculated assuming the stockholder also paid the maximum upfront selling commission, dealer manager fee and ongoing distribution fees in effect during the time period indicated. With respect to “Class T Share Total Return (without Sales Charge),” the Total Returns are calculated assuming the stockholder did not pay any upfront selling commission or dealer manager fee, but did pay the maximum ongoing distribution fees in effect during the time period indicated. From NAV inception to January 31, 2020, these NAVs reflected mark-to-market adjustments on our borrowing-related debt instruments and our borrowing-related interest rate hedge positions.

61

(4) The Adjusted Total Returns presented are based on adjusted NAVs calculated as if we had continued to mark our borrowing-related hedge and debt instruments to market following a policy change to largely exclude borrowing-related interest rate hedge and debt marks to market from our NAV calculations (except in certain circumstances pursuant to our valuation procedures), beginning with our NAV calculated as of February 29, 2020. Therefore, the NAVs used in the calculation of Adjusted Total Returns were calculated in the same manner as the NAVs used in the calculation of the unadjusted total return for periods through January 31, 2020. The Adjusted Total Returns include the incremental impact of the adjusted NAVs on advisory fees and performance fees; however, they do not include the incremental impact that the adjusted NAVs would have had on any expense support from our Advisor, or the prices at which shares were purchased in our public offerings or pursuant to our share redemption program. For calculation purposes, transactions in our common stock were assumed to occur at the adjusted NAVs.

Impacts of COVID-19

During 2020, the global pandemic and resulting shut down of large parts of the U.S. economy created significant uncertainty and enhanced investment risk across many asset classes, including real estate. The extent of the impact on the commercial real estate sector continues to vary dramatically across real estate property types and markets, with certain property segments affected particularly harshly. While not immune to the effects of COVID-19, the industrial property sector continues to remain relatively resilient and we believe we are well-positioned to navigate this unprecedented period. For the year ended December 31, 2020, we raised over $968.6 million in equity capital. We believe that the increased pace at which we raised capital in early 2020, particularly in the first quarter, was primarily due to an influx of capital from Industrial Property Trust (“IPT”) shareholders who determined to invest in our common shares following the completion of IPT’s asset sale in January 2020. However, we continued to see steady capital inflows from new investors who invested $440.4 million of new capital into the Company during the remainder of 2020. We ended the year with $2.1 billion in assets under management, which includes the fair value of our real estate investments, the fair value of our net investment in joint venture partnerships and $232.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, as well as 28.3% leverage, which is calculated as our total borrowings outstanding divided by the fair value of our real properties plus our net investment in unconsolidated joint venture partnerships plus cash and cash equivalents. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Resources and Uses of Liquidity—Offering Proceeds” for further information concerning capital raised during 2020 and our expectations regarding the pace of capital raising in the near term. As of December 31, 2020, we owned and managed, either directly or through our minority ownership interests in our joint venture partnerships (which are presented as if we own a 100% interest), a total real estate portfolio that included 132 industrial buildings totaling approximately 30.3 million square feet located in 23 markets throughout the U.S., with 205 customers, and was 84.9% occupied (87.8% leased) with a weighted-average remaining lease term (based on square feet) of 4.7 years. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we leased approximately 3.2 million square feet, which included 2.2 million square feet of new and future leases and 1.0 million square feet of renewals, through 38 separate transactions with an average annual base rent of $6.82 per square foot. Future leases represent new leases for units that are entered into while the units are occupied by the current customer.

Our asset management teams are working directly with our customers to manage through these turbulent times. Many of our customers’ businesses have been disrupted and some of our more impacted customers are experiencing lost revenue. Our teams are working with these customers to ensure they take advantage of any available insurance and government stimulus programs, which may help them pay rent whether in full or in part. Where appropriate, we have restructured leases and may restructure additional leases to provide temporary rent relief needed by certain customers while positioning ourselves to recapture abated rent over time. Within our total portfolio, without adjusting for the effects of forbearance agreements, we received 98.7% of our rent originally payable for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to average annual collections of over 99% prior to the pandemic. We have executed or agreed to such forbearance agreements with approximately 1.2% of our customers (based on annual gross rent). Within our total portfolio, we received 98.4% of our contractual rent for January and February as of March 1, 2021. Rent relief requests decreased in the third and fourth quarters of 2020 and did not have a material impact on our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020. We can provide no assurances that we will be able to continue to collect rent at the same level that we did prior to the pandemic. Furthermore, we can provide no assurances that we will be able to recover unpaid rent.

While the uncertain length and depth of the damage from business disruptions remain a significant risk, we believe our NAV as of December 31, 2020 currently reflects this uncertainty. During the third quarter of 2020, we experienced a reduction of deployment due to increased demand for industrial properties, as well as the effects of COVID-19. Deployment increased in the fourth quarter of 2020 with the acquisition of eight buildings in four markets. Going forward, the market disruption may continue to slow our pace of deployment further as sellers may be less willing to transact. Slower deployment of capital into income producing real estate further reduces near-term cash flow generated to cover our distributions to our stockholders and may cause us to reduce our NAV in future periods in the

62

absence of asset appreciation or expense support from the Advisor. However, we believe our strong balance sheet and ability as an operator will allow us to be a patient buyer of assets in order to maximize long-term total return.

Share Redemption Program

Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, our share redemption program may provide a limited opportunity for stockholders to have shares of our common stock redeemed for cash. To the extent our board of directors determines that we have sufficient available cash for redemptions, we initially intend to redeem shares under our share redemption program on a monthly basis; however, our board of directors may determine from time to time to adjust the timing of redemptions or suspend, terminate or otherwise modify our share redemption program.

While stockholders may request on a monthly basis that we redeem all or any portion of their shares pursuant to our share redemption program, we are not obligated to redeem any shares and may choose to redeem only some, or even none, of the shares that have been requested to be redeemed in any particular month, in our discretion. In addition, our ability to fulfill redemption requests is subject to a number of limitations. As a result, share redemptions may not be available each month. Under our share redemption program, to the extent we determine to redeem shares in any particular month, we will only redeem shares as of the last calendar day of that month (each such date, a “Redemption Date”). Redemptions will be made at the transaction price in effect on the Redemption Date, except that shares that have not been outstanding for at least one year will be redeemed at 95% of the transaction price. This deduction is referred to as an Early Redemption Deduction. However, our board of directors has determined to waive the 5.0% early redemption deduction for shares redeemed from February of 2021 through at least the end of September of 2021, even if the shares have been outstanding for less than one year. The Early Redemption Deduction may also be waived in certain circumstances including: (i) in the case of redemption requests arising from the death or qualified disability of the holder; (ii) in the event that a stockholder’s shares are redeemed because the stockholder has failed to maintain the $2,000 minimum account balance; or (iii) with respect to shares purchased through our distribution reinvestment plan or received from us as a stock dividend. To have shares redeemed, a stockholder’s redemption request and required documentation must be received in good order by 4:00 p.m. (Eastern time) on the second to last business day of the applicable month. Settlements of share redemptions will be made within three business days of the Redemption Date. An investor may withdraw its redemption request by notifying the transfer agent before 4:00 p.m. (Eastern time) on the last business day of the applicable month.

Under our share redemption program, we may redeem during any calendar month shares whose aggregate value (based on the price at which the shares are redeemed) is 2.0% of our aggregate NAV as of the last calendar day of the previous quarter and during any calendar quarter whose aggregate value (based on the price at which the shares are redeemed) is up to 5.0% of our aggregate NAV as of the last calendar day of the prior calendar quarter.

Provided that the share redemption program has been operating and not suspended for the first month of a given quarter and that all properly submitted redemption requests were satisfied, any unused capacity for that month will carry over to the second month. Also, provided that the share redemption program has been operating and not suspended for the first two months of a given quarter and that all properly submitted redemption requests were satisfied, any unused capacity for those two months will carry over to the third month. In no event will such carry-over capacity permit the redemption of shares with aggregate value (based on the redemption price per share for the month the redemption is effected) in excess of 5% of the combined NAV of all classes of shares as of the last calendar day of the previous calendar quarter (provided that for these purposes redemptions may be measured on a net basis as described in the paragraph below).

We currently measure the foregoing redemption allocations and limitations based on net redemptions during a month or quarter, as applicable. The term “net redemptions” means, during the applicable period, the excess of our share redemptions (capital outflows) over the proceeds from the sale of our shares (capital inflows). Thus, for any given calendar quarter, the maximum amount of redemptions during that quarter will be equal to (1) 5% of the combined NAV of all classes of shares as of the last calendar day of the previous calendar quarter, plus (2) proceeds from sales of new shares in this offering (including purchases pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan) since the beginning of the current calendar quarter. The same would apply for a given month, except that redemptions in a month would be subject to the 2% limit described above (subject to potential carry-over capacity), and netting would be measured on a monthly basis. With respect to future periods, our board of directors may choose whether the allocations and limitations will be applied to “gross redemptions,” i.e., without netting against capital inflows, rather than to net redemptions. If redemptions for a given month or quarter are measured on a gross basis rather than on a net basis, the redemption limitations could limit the amount of shares redeemed in a given month or quarter despite our receiving a net capital inflow for that month or quarter. In order for our board of directors to change the application of the allocations and limitations from net redemptions to gross redemptions or vice versa, we will provide notice to stockholders in a prospectus supplement or special or periodic report filed by us, as well as in a press release or on our website, at least 10 days before the first business

63

day of the quarter for which the new test will apply. The determination to measure redemptions on a gross basis, or vice versa, will only be made for an entire quarter, and not particular months within a quarter.

If the transaction price for the applicable month is not made available by the tenth business day prior to the last business day of the month (or is changed after such date), then no redemption requests will be accepted for such month and stockholders who wish to have their shares redeemed the following month must resubmit their redemption requests.

Although the vast majority of our assets consist of properties that cannot generally be readily liquidated on short notice without impacting our ability to realize full value upon their disposition, we intend to maintain a number of sources of liquidity including (i) cash equivalents (e.g. money market funds), other short-term investments, U.S. government securities, agency securities and liquid real estate-related securities and (ii) one or more borrowing facilities. We may fund redemptions from any available source of funds, including operating cash flows, borrowings, proceeds from our public offerings and/or sales of our assets.

Should redemption requests, in our judgment, place an undue burden on our liquidity, adversely affect our operations or risk having an adverse impact on the Company as a whole, or should we otherwise determine that investing our liquid assets in real properties or other illiquid investments rather than redeeming our shares is in the best interests of the company as a whole, then we may choose to redeem fewer shares than have been requested to be redeemed, or none at all. In the event that we determine to redeem some but not all of the shares submitted for redemption during any month for any of the foregoing reasons, shares submitted for redemption during such month will be redeemed on a pro rata basis. All unsatisfied redemption requests must be resubmitted after the start of the next month or quarter, or upon the recommencement of the share redemption program, as applicable. If the transaction price for the applicable month is not made available by the tenth business day prior to the last business day of the month (or is changed after such date), then no redemption requests will be accepted for such month and stockholders who wish to have their shares redeemed the following month must resubmit their redemption requests.

The preceding summary does not purport to be a complete summary of our share redemption program and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the share redemption program, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Refer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional details regarding our redemption history.

The table below summarizes the redemption activity for the three months ended December 31, 2020:

				Total Number of Shares	Maximum Number of
				Redeemed as Part of	Shares That May Yet Be
	Total Number of	Average Price Paid		Publicly Announced	Redeemed Under the
For the Month Ended	Shares Redeemed	per Share		Plans or Programs	Plans or Programs (1)
October 31, 2020	53,646	$	9.81	53,646	—
November 30, 2020	64,270		10.02	64,270	—
December 31, 2020	48,583		9.92	48,583	—
Total	166,499	$	9.92	166,499	—

(1) We limit the number of shares that may be redeemed per calendar quarter under the program as described above.

Distributions

Each year, we make distributions, other than capital gain dividends and deemed distributions of retained capital gain, to our stockholders in an aggregate amount at least equal to the sum of 90% of our REIT taxable income, computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain or loss, 90% of our after-tax net income, if any, from foreclosure property, minus the sum of certain items of non-cash income. We will pay federal income tax on taxable income, including net capital gain, which we do not distribute to stockholders. Furthermore, if we fail to distribute with respect to each year, at least the sum of 85% of our REIT ordinary income for such year, 95% of our REIT capital gain income for such year, and any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, we will incur a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the excess of such required distribution over the amounts we actually distribute. Distributions will be authorized at the discretion of our board of directors, in accordance with our earnings, cash flow and general financial condition. Our board’s discretion will be directed, in substantial part, by its obligation to cause us to comply with the REIT requirements. Because we

64

may receive income from interest or rents at various times during our fiscal year, and because our board may take various factors into consideration in setting distributions, distributions may not reflect our income earned in that particular distribution period and may be made in advance of actual receipt of funds in an attempt to make distributions relatively uniform. Our organizational documents permit us to pay distributions from any source, including offering proceeds. We are authorized to borrow money, issue new securities or sell assets in order to make distributions. There are no restrictions on the ability of the Operating Partnership to transfer funds to us.

We intend to accrue and continue to make distributions on a regular basis. Distributions are paid on a monthly basis and are calculated as of monthly record dates. Distributions for stockholders who had elected to participate in our distribution reinvestment plan were reinvested into shares of the same class of our common stock as the shares to which the distributions relate. Some or all of the distributions may be paid from sources other than cash flows from operating activities, such as cash flows from financing activities, which could include borrowings and net proceeds from primary shares sold in our public offerings, proceeds from the issuance of shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, cash resulting from a waiver or deferral of fees otherwise payable to the Advisor or its affiliates, cash resulting from the Advisor or its affiliates paying certain of our expenses, proceeds from the sales of assets, and our cash balances. We have not established a cap on the amount of its distributions that may be paid from any of these sources.

There can be no assurances that the current distribution rate will be maintained. In the near-term, we expect that we may need to continue to rely on sources other than cash flows from operations, as determined on a GAAP basis, to pay our distributions, which if insufficient could negatively impact our ability to pay such distributions. For the year ended December 31, 2020, approximately 1.4% of our total gross distributions were paid from cash flows from operating activities, as determined on a GAAP basis, and 98.6% of our total gross distributions were funded from sources other than cash flows from operating activities; specifically 20.2% of our total gross distributions were paid from cash provided by expense support from the Advisor, 28.6% were funded with proceeds from financing activities, and 49.8% were funded with proceeds from the issuance of shares under our distribution reinvestment plan. See “Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for further details regarding the Expense Support Agreement among us, the Operating Partnership and the Advisor.

Refer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for detail regarding our distribution history, as well as the sources used to pay our distributions.

Holders

As of March 1, 2021, we had 138.8 million shares of our Class T common stock, 9.0 million shares of our Class W common stock and 4.0 million shares of our Class I common stock outstanding, held by a total of 26,171 stockholders, 1,581 stockholders and 795 stockholders, respectively, including shares held by our affiliates.

ITEM 6.        SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.

65

ITEM 7.        MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following information contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” above for a description of these risks and uncertainties.

OVERVIEW

General

Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc. is a Maryland corporation formed on August 12, 2014 to make investments in income-producing real estate assets consisting primarily of high-quality distribution warehouses and other industrial properties that are leased to creditworthy corporate customers. We currently operate as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and elected to be treated as a REIT beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2017. We utilize an UPREIT organizational structure to hold all or substantially all of our assets through the Operating Partnership.

On February 18, 2016, the SEC declared our registration statement for our initial public offering of up to $2.0 billion of shares of its common stock effective. On September 5, 2019, our initial public offering was terminated immediately upon the effectiveness of our registration statement for our follow-on public offering of up to $2.0 billion of shares of our common stock, and our follow-on public offering commenced the same day. Under our follow-on public offering, we are offering up to $1.5 billion of shares of our common stock in the primary offering and up to $500.0 million of shares of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, in any combination of Class T shares, Class W shares and Class I shares. We may reallocate amounts between the primary offering and distribution reinvestment plan. Our follow-on public offering is a continuous offering that will end no later than September 5, 2021, unless extended in accordance with federal securities laws. We intend to conduct a continuous offering that will not have a predetermined duration, subject to continued compliance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and applicable state laws.

Pursuant to our public offerings, we offered and continue to offer shares of our common stock at the “transaction price,” plus applicable selling commissions and dealer manager fees. The “transaction price” generally is equal to the net asset value (“NAV”) per share of our common stock most recently disclosed. Our NAV per share is calculated as of the last calendar day of each month for each of our outstanding classes of common stock, and is available generally within 15 calendar days after the end of the applicable month. Shares issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan are offered at the transaction price, as indicated above, in effect on the distribution date. We may update a previously disclosed transaction price in cases where we believe there has been a material change (positive or negative) to our NAV per share relative to the most recently disclosed monthly NAV per share. See Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities—Net Asset Value” for further detail.

Additionally, we intend to initiate the DST Program. These private placement offerings will be exempt from registration requirements pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. We anticipate that these interests may serve as replacement properties for investors seeking to complete like-kind exchange transactions under Section 1031 of the Code. Similar to our prior private placement offerings, we expect that the DST Program will give us the opportunity to expand and diversify our capital raise strategies by offering what we believe to be an attractive and unique investment product for investors that may be seeking replacement properties to complete like-kind exchange transactions.

As of December 31, 2020, we had raised gross proceeds of approximately $1.5 billion from the sale of 141.9 million shares of our common stock, including shares issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. See “Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for information concerning our public offerings.

On July 15, 2020, we acquired minority ownership interests in two joint venture partnerships, the BTC I Partnership and the BTC II Partnership, with third party investors for $301.0 million in cash paid at closing, exclusive of due diligence expenses and other closing costs. As of the date of acquisition, the joint venture partnerships’ aggregate real estate portfolios consisted of 64 acquired or completed buildings and 18 buildings under construction or in the pre-construction phase.

66

As of December 31, 2020, we owned and managed, either directly or through our minority ownership interests in our joint venture partnerships (which are presented as if we own a 100% interest), a total real estate portfolio that included 132 industrial buildings totaling approximately 30.3 million square feet located in 23 markets throughout the U.S., with 205 customers, and was 84.9% occupied (87.8% leased) with a weighted-average remaining lease term (based on square feet) of approximately 4.7 years. The occupied rate reflects the square footage with a paying customer in place. The leased rate includes the occupied square footage and additional square footage with leases in place that have not yet commenced. Refer to “Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for detail regarding our 2020 acquisition activity. As of December 31, 2020, our total real estate portfolio included:

● 121 industrial buildings totaling approximately 28.2 million square feet comprised our operating portfolio, which includes stabilized properties, and was 91.0% occupied (94.2% leased) with a weighted-average remaining lease term (based on square feet) of approximately 4.7 years; and

● 11 industrial buildings totaling approximately 2.1 million square feet comprised our value-add portfolio, which includes buildings acquired with the intention to reposition or redevelop, or buildings recently completed which have not yet reached stabilization. We generally consider a building to be stabilized on the earlier to occur of the first anniversary of a building’s shell completion or a building achieving 90% occupancy.

Of our total portfolio, we owned and managed 67 buildings totaling approximately 17.5 million square feet through our minority ownership interests in our joint venture partnerships (as described in “Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements”). In addition, as of December 31, 2020, through our minority joint venture partnerships, we owned and managed 16 buildings either under construction or in the pre-construction phase totaling approximately 5.1 million square feet.

Through December 31, 2020, we had directly acquired 65 buildings comprised of approximately 12.8 million square feet for an aggregate total purchase price of approximately $1.4 billion, as well as the minority ownership interests in the two joint venture partnerships, as described above. Also, through our minority ownership interests in our joint venture partnerships, we completed the development of three industrial buildings comprising an aggregate of 1.0 million square feet and total costs to complete the development of approximately $91.7 million during the period from July 16, 2020 through December 31, 2020. We funded these acquisitions and development activity primarily with proceeds from our public offerings, institutional equity, and debt financings.

We have used, and intend to continue to use, the net proceeds from our offerings primarily to make investments in real estate assets. We may use the net proceeds from our offerings to make other real estate-related investments and debt investments and to pay distributions. The number and type of properties we may acquire and debt and other investments we may make will depend upon real estate market conditions, the amount of proceeds we raise in our offerings, and other circumstances existing at the time we make our investments.

Our primary investment objectives include the following:

● preserving and protecting our stockholders’ capital contributions;

● providing current income to our stockholders in the form of regular distributions; and

● realizing capital appreciation upon the potential sale of our assets or other liquidity events.

There is no assurance that we will attain our investment objectives. Our charter places numerous limitations on us with respect to the manner in which we may invest our funds. In most cases these limitations cannot be changed unless our charter is amended, which may require the approval of our stockholders.

We may acquire assets free and clear of mortgage or other indebtedness by paying the entire purchase price in cash or equity securities, or a combination thereof, and we may selectively encumber all or only certain assets with debt. The proceeds from our borrowings may be used to fund investments, make capital expenditures, pay distributions, and for general corporate purposes.

We expect to manage our corporate financing strategy under the current mortgage lending and corporate financing environment by considering various lending sources, which may include long-term fixed-rate mortgage loans, unsecured or secured lines of credit or term loans, private placement or public bond issuances, and the assumption of existing loans in connection with certain property acquisitions, or any combination of the foregoing.

67

Real Estate Outlook

Following years of growth, the U.S. economy entered a recession in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in significant economic disruption, forced business closures, and stay-at home measures across the country. Despite this backdrop, the U.S. industrial real estate sector continued its strong performance and remains healthy as we look forward to 2021. With continued vaccine success, we expect moderate economic growth in the U.S. next year as a recovery takes hold, leading to employment growth and business expansion. E-commerce growth and evolving supply chain dynamics are expected to continue to drive positive demand for warehouse space as companies expand and upgrade their distribution networks and supply chains.

The U.S. industrial real estate sector continues to benefit from positive net absorption (the net change in total occupied industrial space), low vacancy rates, and continued rent growth in our primary target markets. Consistent with recent experience and based on current market conditions, we expect average net effective rental rates on new leases signed during 2021 to be higher than the rates on expiring leases.

Technological advancements, shifting consumer preferences, and the resultant supply chain innovations have supported continued growth of e-commerce, and has only accelerated as a result of COVID-19. The dollar volume of retail goods purchased online continues to grow significantly, average 16.1% annual increases over the past 10 years, reaching $787.9 billion over the past year, and comprises an increasing proportion of total retail sales. As online sales grow and more retailers continue to adapt to changing consumer preferences and technologies, the need for highly functional warehouse space near major cities is expected to increase.

Heightened policy uncertainty with a new administration will likely weigh on global economies and capital flows throughout the coming year. However, capital markets outlook for industrial real estate remains strong as institutional investor demand continues to increase in part driven by both the current industrial real estate fundamentals and the ongoing secular shift to online consumer spending.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Summary of 2020 Activities

During 2020, we completed the following activities:

● Our NAV was $10.1437 per share as of December 31, 2020 as compared to $10.0763 per share as of December 31, 2019.

● We raised $968.6 million of gross equity capital from our public offering.

● We acquired 20 industrial buildings comprised of 4.3 million square feet for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $475.3 million, which is equal to the total consideration paid. We funded these acquisitions with proceeds from our public offerings and debt financings.

● We closed a transaction to acquire interests in two joint venture partnerships, the BTC I Partnership and the BTC II Partnership, with third party investors for a purchase price of $301.0 million in cash paid at closing, exclusive of due diligence expenses and other closing costs.

● During 2020, the BTC I Partnership met certain return thresholds, resulting in a promote distribution to partners. We elected to receive our portion of the promote distribution as an increase of our interest in the BTC I Partnership from 20.0% to 26.8%, in lieu of cash.

● For the period from July 16, 2020 through December 31, 2020, we, through our ownership interest in the BTC I Partnership, completed the development of one industrial building comprising 0.3 million square feet for aggregate total costs to complete the development of approximately $30.9 million.

● For the period from July 16, 2020 through December 31, 2020, we, through our ownership interest in the BTC II Partnership, completed the development of two industrial buildings comprising 0.7 million square feet for aggregate total costs to complete the development of approximately $60.8 million.

68

● As of December 31, 2020, our joint venture partnerships had an additional nine buildings under construction totaling approximately 2.7 million square feet and seven buildings in the pre-construction phase for an additional 2.4 million square feet.

● We entered into a secured fixed-rate mortgage note in the amount of $118.5 million with an interest rate of 2.90% and a term of seven years.

● We entered into interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $150.0 million during the first quarter of 2020 to hedge LIBOR on our term loan, including one that became effective during the second quarter. These interest rate swaps, in combination with those already in place, effectively fix LIBOR at a weighted-average of 1.14% and result in an all-in interest rate on our term loan ranging from 1.84% to 2.60% depending on our consolidated leverage ratio. 

● We leased approximately 3.2 million square feet, which included 2.2 million square feet of new and future leases and 1.0 million square feet of renewals through 38 separate transactions with an average annual base rent of $6.82 per square foot.

We are in the acquisition phase of our life cycle, and the results of our operations are primarily impacted by the timing of our acquisitions and the equity raised through our public offerings. Accordingly, our operating results for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 are not directly comparable, nor are our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020 indicative of those expected in future periods. We believe that our revenues, operating expenses and interest expense will continue to increase in future periods as a result of continued growth in our portfolio and as a result of the incremental effect of anticipated future acquisitions of industrial real estate properties.

Portfolio Information

Our total owned and managed portfolio was as follows:

	As of December 31,
(square feet in thousands)	2020		2019
Portfolio data:
Consolidated buildings (1)	65		45
Unconsolidated buildings (1)	67		—
Total buildings	132		45
Rentable square feet of consolidated buildings (1)	12,810		8,486
Rentable square feet of unconsolidated buildings (1)	17,531		—
Total rentable square feet	30,341		8,486
Total number of customers (2)	205		103
Percent occupied of operating portfolio (2)(3)	91.0	%	98.7	%
Percent occupied of total portfolio (2)(3)	84.9	%	98.7	%
Percent leased of operating portfolio (2)(3)	94.2	%	100.0	%
Percent leased of total portfolio (2)(3)	87.8	%	100.0	%

(1) Represents acquired or completed buildings.

(2) Represents our total portfolio of owned and managed properties, including our consolidated and unconsolidated properties. Unconsolidated properties are those owned through our minority ownership interests in our joint venture partnerships. Properties owned through our joint venture partnerships are shown as if we owned a 100% interest. See “Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for more details on our joint venture partnerships.

(3) See “Overview—General” above for a description of our operating portfolio and our total portfolio (which includes our operating and value-add portfolios) and for a description of the occupied and leased rates.

69

Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2019

The following table summarizes the changes in our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2019. We evaluate the performance of consolidated operating properties we own and manage using a same store analysis because the population of properties in this analysis is consistent from period to period, thereby eliminating the effects of any material changes in the composition of the aggregate portfolio on performance measures. We have defined the same store portfolio to include consolidated operating properties owned for the entirety of both the current and prior reporting periods for which the operations had been stabilized. Unconsolidated properties are excluded from the same store portfolio because we account for our interests in the joint venture partnerships using the equity method of accounting; therefore, our proportionate share of income and loss is recognized in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint venture partnership on the consolidated statements of operations. “Other properties” includes buildings not meeting the same store criteria. The same store operating portfolio for the periods presented below include 13 buildings totaling approximately 2.7 million square feet owned as of January 1, 2019, which represented 21.4% of total consolidated rentable square feet, 27.5% of total revenues, and 28.1% of net operating income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2020.

	For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share data)	2020		2019		Change		% Change
Rental revenues:
Same store operating properties	$	21,847	$	21,334	$	513		2.4	%
Other properties		57,549		19,043		38,506		NM
Total rental revenues		79,396		40,377		39,019		96.6	%
Rental expenses:
Same store operating properties		(5,035)		(4,840)		(195)		(4.0)	%
Other properties		(14,515)		(4,939)		(9,576)		NM
Total rental expenses		(19,550)		(9,779)		(9,771)		(99.9)	%
Net operating income:
Same store operating properties		16,812		16,494		318		1.9	%
Other properties		43,034		14,104		28,930		NM
Total net operating income		59,846		30,598		29,248		95.6	%
Other income and expenses:
Real estate-related depreciation and amortization		(46,483)		(22,236)		(24,247)		NM
General and administrative expenses		(3,970)		(2,485)		(1,485)		(59.8)	%
Advisory fees, related party		(19,293)		(7,498)		(11,795)		NM
Acquisition costs and reimbursements		(3,166)		(3,068)		(98)		(3.2)	%
Other expense reimbursements, related party		(3,003)		(1,963)		(1,040)		(53.0)	%
Equity in loss from unconsolidated joint venture partnerships		(1,790)		—		(1,790)		—	%
Interest expense and other		(12,316)		(8,290)		(4,026)		(48.6)	%
Total expense support from (reimbursement to) the Advisor, net		—		(7,468)		7,468		100.0	%
Total other income and expenses		(90,021)		(53,008)		(37,013)		(69.8)	%
Net loss		(30,175)		(22,410)		(7,765)		(34.6)	%
Net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest		83		42		41		97.6	%
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		(5)		—		(5)		—	%
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(30,097)	$	(22,368)	$	(7,729)		(34.6)	%
Weighted-average shares outstanding		113,145		37,382		75,763
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(0.27)	$	(0.60)	$	0.33

Rental Revenues. Rental revenues are comprised of rental income, straight-line rent and amortization of above- and below-market lease assets and liabilities. Total rental revenues increased by approximately $39.0 million, or 96.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019, primarily due to an increase in non-same store revenues, which was attributable to the significant growth in our portfolio over this period. For the year ended December 31, 2020, non-same store rental revenues reflect the addition of 52 buildings we have acquired since January 1, 2019. Same store rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 2020 increased by $0.5 million, or 2.4%, as compared to the same period in 2019, primarily due to an increase in recoverable expenses that resulted in increases to recovery revenue.

Rental Expenses. Rental expenses include certain property operating expenses typically reimbursed by our customers, such as real estate taxes, property insurance, property management fees, repair and maintenance, and utilities. Total rental expenses increased by approximately $9.8 million, or 99.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019, primarily due to an

70

increase in non-same store expenses, which was attributable to the significant growth in our portfolio since January 1, 2019. Same store rental expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020 increased by $0.2 million, or 4.0%, as compared to the same period in 2019, primarily due to an increase in property taxes due to reassessments for certain of our assets, partially offset by a decrease in repairs and maintenance, including lower snow removal, landscaping, and other maintenance costs.

Other Expenses. Other expenses, in aggregate, increased by approximately $37.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019, primarily due to the following:

● an increase in real estate-related depreciation and amortization expense, advisory fees and general and administrative expenses totaling an aggregate amount of $37.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, as a result of the growth in our portfolio, as compared to the same period in 2019; and

● an increase in interest expense of $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily related to: (i) an increase in the interest expense from the two mortgage notes assumed in connection with the acquisition of the Dallas Infill Industrial Portfolio in June 2019 of $0.9 million, as compared to the same period in 2019, (ii) the interest expense from the mortgage note entered into in October 2020 of $0.7 million, and (iii) an increase in the interest expense of $2.1 million from borrowings under the term loan due to an increase in average net borrowings of $235.9 million, as compared to the same period in 2019; partially offset by a decrease in interest from borrowings under the line of credit due to a decrease in average net borrowings of $53.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019.

Partially offset by:

● a net increase in expense support from (reimbursement to) the Advisor of $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, due to (i) the expense support received from the Advisor of $13.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the $6.0 million of expense support received from the Advisor for the year ended December 31, 2019 and (ii) the reimbursements to the Advisor of $13.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the $13.6 million of reimbursements to the Advisor for the year ended December 31, 2019, of previously deferred fees and other expenses that were previously supported, pursuant to the expense support agreement between us and the Advisor.

Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2018

See “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed with the SEC on March 5, 2020, which is incorporated herein by reference, for a comparison of our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

Generally, we are prohibited by our charter from incurring total operating expenses which, at the end of the four preceding fiscal quarters exceeds the greater of: (i) 2.0% of our average invested assets, or (ii) 25.0% of our net income determined without reduction for any additions to reserves for depreciation, bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves and excluding any gain from the sale of our assets for that period (the “2%/25% Limitation”). Notwithstanding the above, we may incur operating expenses in excess of this limitation if a majority of our independent directors determines that such excess expenses are justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. Due to the operating expenses we incurred for the four fiscal quarters ended December 31, 2020, our total operating expenses exceeded the 2%/25% Limitation. Based upon a review of unusual and non-recurring factors, including but not limited to a significant spike in capital raised from our public offering in the first quarter of 2020, which we are still working to deploy as we continue to build our initial real estate portfolio, and an increase in the performance component of the advisory fee as a result of our receipt of the BTC I promote in December 2020, the majority of our independent directors determined that the excess expenses were justified. For these purposes, operating expenses exclude rental expenses, real estate-related depreciation and amortization expense, interest expense, acquisition expenses, taxes and impairments.

ADDITIONAL MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE

Net Loss and Net Operating Income (“NOI”)

We define NOI as GAAP rental revenues less GAAP rental expenses. We consider NOI to be an appropriate supplemental performance measure and believe NOI provides useful information to our investors regarding our results of operations because NOI reflects the

71

operating performance of our properties and excludes certain items that are not considered to be controllable in connection with the management of the properties, such as real estate-related depreciation and amortization, acquisition-related expenses, impairment charges, general and administrative expenses, and interest expense. However, NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of our financial performance since it excludes such expenses, which expenses could materially impact our results of operations. Further, our NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies as they may use different methodologies for calculating NOI. Therefore, we believe our net income (loss), as defined by GAAP, to be the most appropriate measure to evaluate our overall performance. Refer to “Results of Operations” above for a reconciliation of our GAAP net income (loss) to NOI for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Funds from Operations (“FFO”) and Modified Funds from Operations (“MFFO”)

We believe that FFO and MFFO, in addition to net income (loss) and cash flows from operating activities as defined by GAAP, are useful supplemental performance measures that our management uses to evaluate our consolidated operating performance. However, these supplemental, non-GAAP measures should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or to cash flows from operating activities as an indication of our performance and are not intended to be used as a liquidity measure indicative of cash flow available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. No single measure can provide users of financial information with sufficient information and only our disclosures read as a whole can be relied upon to adequately portray our financial position, liquidity, and results of operations. Fees deferred or waived by the Advisor and payments received from the Advisor and/or reimbursed to the Advisor pursuant to the expense support agreement are included in determining our net income (loss), which is used to determine FFO and MFFO. If we had not received support from the Advisor and/or reimbursed the Advisor pursuant to the expense support agreement, our FFO and MFFO would have been lower or higher. In addition, other REITs may define FFO and similar measures differently and choose to treat acquisition-related costs and potentially other accounting line items in a manner different from us due to specific differences in investment and operating strategy or for other reasons.

FFO. As defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”), FFO is a non-GAAP measure that excludes certain items such as real estate-related depreciation and amortization. We believe FFO is a meaningful supplemental measure of our operating performance that is useful to investors because depreciation and amortization in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. We use FFO as an indication of our consolidated operating performance and as a guide to making decisions about future investments.

MFFO. As defined by the Institute for Portfolio Alternatives (“IPA”), MFFO is a non-GAAP supplemental financial performance measure used to evaluate our operating performance. Similar to FFO, MFFO excludes items such as real estate-related depreciation and amortization. MFFO excludes acquisition-related costs, straight-line rent and amortization of above- and below-market leases. In addition, there are certain other MFFO adjustments as defined by the IPA that are not applicable to us and are not included in our presentation of MFFO.

We are in the acquisition phase of our life cycle. Management does not include historical acquisition-related costs in its evaluation of future operating performance, as such costs are not expected to be incurred once our acquisition phase is complete. We use FFO and MFFO to, among other things: (i) evaluate and compare the potential performance of the portfolio after the acquisition phase is complete, and (ii) evaluate potential performance to determine liquidity event strategies. Although some REITs may present similar measures differently from us, we believe FFO and MFFO generally facilitate a comparison to other REITs that have similar operating characteristics to us. We believe investors are best served if the information that is made available to them allows them to align their analyses and evaluation with the same performance metrics used by management in planning and executing our business strategy. We believe that these performance metrics will assist investors in evaluating the potential performance of the portfolio after the completion of the acquisition phase. However, these supplemental, non-GAAP measures are not necessarily indicative of future performance and should not be considered as an alternative to net loss or to cash flows from operating activities and is not intended to be used as a liquidity measure indicative of cash flow available to fund our cash needs. Neither the SEC, NAREIT, nor any regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments used to calculate FFO and MFFO. In the future, the SEC, NAREIT, or a regulatory body may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the non-traded REIT industry at which point we may adjust our calculation and characterization of FFO and MFFO.

72

The following unaudited table presents a reconciliation of GAAP net income (loss) to NAREIT FFO and MFFO:

							For the Period
							From Inception
	For the Year Ended December 31,						(August 12, 2014) to
(in thousands, except per share data)	2020		2019		2018		December 31, 2020
GAAP net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(30,097)	$	(22,368)	$	(4,223)	$	(56,660)
GAAP net loss per common share		(0.27)	$	(0.60)	$	(0.46)	$	(2.16)
Reconciliation of GAAP net loss to NAREIT FFO:
GAAP net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(30,097)	$	(22,368)	$	(4,223)	$	(56,660)
Add (deduct) NAREIT adjustments:
Real estate-related depreciation and amortization		46,483		22,236		3,541		72,260
Our share of real estate-related depreciation and amortization of unconsolidated joint venture partnerships		5,048		—		—		5,048
Redeemable noncontrolling interest's share of real estate-related depreciation and amortization and our share of real estate-related depreciation and amortization of unconsolidated joint venture partnerships		(141)		(42)		—		(183)
NAREIT FFO attributable to common stockholders	$	21,293	$	(174)	$	(682)	$	20,465
NAREIT FFO per common share	$	0.19	$	(0.00)	$	(0.07)	$	0.78
Reconciliation of NAREIT FFO to MFFO:
NAREIT FFO attributable to common stockholders	$	21,293	$	(174)	$	(682)	$	20,465
Add (deduct) MFFO adjustments:
Acquisition costs and reimbursements		3,166		3,068		4,900		11,134
Redeemable noncontrolling interest's share of acquisition costs and reimbursements		(9)		(6)				(14)
Straight-line rent and amortization of above/below-market leases		(7,744)		(4,420)		(1,673)		(13,838)
Our share of straight-line rent and amortization of above/below-market leases of unconsolidated joint venture partnerships		(368)		—		—		(368)
Redeemable noncontrolling interest's share of straight-line rent and amortization of above/below-market leases and our share of straight-line rent and amortization of above/below-market leases of unconsolidated joint venture partnerships		22		8		—		31
MFFO attributable to common stockholders	$	16,360	$	(1,524)	$	2,545	$	17,410
MFFO per common share	$	0.14	$	(0.04)	$	0.28	$	0.66
Weighted-average shares outstanding		113,145		37,382		9,107		26,205

We believe that: (i) our NAREIT FFO of $21.3 million, or $0.19 per share, as compared to the total gross distributions declared (which are paid in cash or reinvested in shares offered through our distribution reinvestment plan) in the amount of $61.6 million or $0.55 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2020; and (ii) our NAREIT FFO of $20.5 million, or $0.78 per share, as compared to the total gross distributions declared (which are paid in cash or reinvested in shares offered through our distribution reinvestment plan) of $87.1 million, or $2.30 per share, for the period from inception (August 12, 2014) to December 31, 2020, are not indicative of future performance as we are in the acquisition phase of our life cycle. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Distributions” below for details concerning our distributions, which are paid in cash or reinvested in shares of our common stock by participants in our distribution reinvestment plan.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity

Our primary sources of capital for meeting our cash requirements during our acquisition phase are and will be net proceeds from our public offerings, including proceeds from the sale of shares offered through our distribution reinvestment plan, debt financings, and cash generated from operating activities. We currently intend to maintain an allocation of 10% of our NAV to cash-related liquidity. Our principal uses of funds are, and will be, for the acquisition of properties and other investments, capital expenditures, operating expenses, payments under our debt obligations, and distributions to our stockholders. Over time, we intend to fund a majority of our cash needs for items other than asset acquisitions, including the repayment of debt and capital expenditures, from operating cash flows and refinancings. There may be a delay between the deployment of proceeds raised from our public offerings and our purchase of assets, which could result in a delay in the benefits to our stockholders, if any, of returns generated from our investments.

73

During 2020, the global pandemic and resulting shut down of large parts of the U.S. economy has created significant uncertainty and enhanced investment risk across many asset classes, including real estate. The COVID-19 pandemic could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as the reduced economic activity severely impacts certain of our customers’ businesses, financial condition and liquidity and may cause certain customers to be unable to meet their obligations to us in full. However, since December 31, 2019 and through December 31, 2020, we have raised over $968.6 million in equity capital. We believe that the increased pace at which we raised capital in early 2020, particularly in the first quarter, was primarily due to an influx of capital from IPT shareholders who determined to invest in our common shares following the completion of IPT’s asset sale in January 2020. However, we continued to see steady capital inflows from new investors who invested $440.4 million of new capital into the Company during the remainder of 2020. See “—Capital Resources and Uses of Liquidity—Offering Proceeds” for further information concerning capital raised in 2020 and our expectations regarding the pace of capital raising in the near term. We ended the year with $2.1 billion in assets under management, which includes the fair value of our real estate investments, the fair value of our net investment in joint venture partnerships and $232.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, as well as 28.3% leverage, which is calculated as our total borrowings outstanding divided by the fair value of our real property plus our investment in unconsolidated joint venture partnerships and cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2020, we owned and managed, either directly or through our minority ownership interests in our joint venture partnerships (which are presented as if we own a 100% interest), a total real estate portfolio that included 132 industrial buildings totaling approximately 30.3 million square feet, with a diverse roster of 205 customers, large and small, spanning a multitude of industries and sectors across 23 markets, with a strategic weighting towards top tier markets where we have historically seen the lowest volatility combined with positive returns over time. Our total portfolio was 84.9% occupied (87.8% leased) with a weighted-average remaining lease term (based on square feet) of 4.7 years. Within our total portfolio, after adjusting for customers with forbearance agreements in place, we received or agreed to defer 99.9% of our rent originally payable for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to average annual collections of over 99% prior to the pandemic. We have executed or agreed to such forbearance agreements with approximately 1.2% of our customers (based on annual gross rent). Within our total portfolio, without adjusting for the effects of forbearance agreements, we received 98.7% of our contractual rent for the year ended December 31, 2020, and 98.4% of our contractual rent for January and February as of March 1, 2021.

The Advisor, subject to the oversight of our board of directors and, under certain circumstances, the investment committee or other committees established by our board of directors, will continue to evaluate potential acquisitions and will engage in negotiations with sellers and lenders on our behalf. Pending investment in property, debt, other investments, and our 10% cash allocation mentioned above, we may decide to temporarily invest any unused proceeds from our public offerings in certain investments that are expected to yield lower returns than those earned on real estate assets. During these times of economic uncertainty, we have seen a slow down in transaction volume, which has adversely impacted our ability to acquire real estate assets, which would cause us to retain more lower yielding investments and hold them for longer periods of time while we seek to acquire additional real estate assets. These lower returns may affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. Potential future sources of capital include proceeds from secured or unsecured financings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from the sale of assets, and undistributed funds from operations.

We believe that our cash on-hand, anticipated net offering proceeds, and anticipated financing activities will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.

Cash Flows. The following table summarizes our cash flows, as determined on a GAAP basis, for the following periods:

	For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2020		2019		2018
Total cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	15,576	$	6,453	$	3,154
Investing activities		(808,430)		(536,903)		(299,953)
Financing activities		974,575		562,607		304,774
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	181,721	$	32,157	$	7,975

2020 Cash Flows Compared to 2019 Cash Flows

Cash provided by operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2020 increased by approximately $9.1 million as compared to the same period in 2019, primarily as a result of growth in our property operations. Cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2020 increased by approximately $271.5 million as compared to the same period in 2019, primarily due to our acquisition of and investment in minority ownership interests in two joint venture partnerships for proceeds of $325.9 million, and an increase in capital

74

expenditures of $5.6 million, partially offset by a decrease in acquisition volume of directly owned properties, as compared to the same period in 2019, of $60.0 million. Cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2020 increased by approximately $412.0 million as compared to the same period in 2019, primarily due to an increase in net proceeds raised through our public offerings of $600.1 million, driven in part by the influx of capital following the completion of IPT’s asset sale in January 2020, as well as proceeds from our new mortgage note of $118.5 million, partially offset by a decrease of $291.6 million in our net borrowing activity on our term loan and line of credit.

2019 Cash Flows Compared to 2018 Cash Flows

See “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed with the SEC on March 5, 2020, which is incorporated herein by reference, for a comparison of our cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

Capital Resources and Uses of Liquidity

In addition to our cash and cash equivalents balance available, our capital resources and uses of liquidity are as follows:

Line of Credit and Term Loan. As of December 31, 2020, we had an aggregate of $730.0 million of commitments under our credit agreement, including $315.0 million under our line of credit and $415.0 million under our term loan. As of that date, we had no amounts outstanding under our line of credit, and $415.0 million outstanding under our term loan with an effective interest rate of 2.23%, which includes the effect of the interest rate swap agreements. The unused portion under our line of credit was $314.9 million and we had $308.0 million available as of December 31, 2020. Our $315.0 million line of credit matures in November 2023, and may be extended pursuant to a one-year extension option, subject to continuing compliance with certain financial covenants and other customary conditions. Our $415.0 million term loan matures in February 2024. Our line of credit and term loan borrowings are available for general corporate purposes including, but not limited to, the acquisition and operation of permitted investments by us. Refer to “Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information regarding our line of credit and term loan.

In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) that regulates LIBOR announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR. As a result, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York organized the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”), which identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as its preferred alternative rate for LIBOR in derivatives and other financial contracts. We are not able to predict when LIBOR will cease to be available or when there will be sufficient liquidity in the SOFR markets. Any changes adopted by the FCA or other governing bodies in the method used for determining LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR. If that were to occur, our interest payment could change. In addition, uncertainty about the extent and manner of future changes may result in interest rate and/or payments that are higher or lower than if LIBOR were to remain available in the current form.

LIBOR is expected to be phased out or modified by June 2023, and the writing of contracts using LIBOR is expected to stop by the end of 2021. As of December 31, 2020, our term loan is our only consolidated indebtedness with maturity beyond 2023 that has exposure to LIBOR. The agreement governing the term loan provides procedures for determining a replacement or alternative base rate in the event that LIBOR is discontinued. However, there can be no assurances as to whether such replacement or alternative base rate will be more or less favorable than LIBOR. As of December 31, 2020, we have interest rate swaps in place to hedge LIBOR on $350.0 million of commitments under our term loan. We intend to monitor the developments with respect to the potential phasing out of LIBOR after 2023 and work with our lenders to seek to ensure any transition away from LIBOR will have minimal impact on our financial condition, but can provide no assurances regarding the impact of the discontinuation of LIBOR.

Mortgage Notes. As of December 31, 2020, we had property-level borrowings of approximately $167.8 million of principal outstanding with a weighted-average remaining term of 6.1 years. These borrowings are secured by mortgages or deeds of trust and related assignments and security interests in the collateralized properties, and had a weighted-average interest rate of 3.14%. Refer to “Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information regarding the mortgage notes.

Debt Covenants. Our line of credit, term loan and mortgage note agreements contain various property-level covenants, including customary affirmative and negative covenants. In addition, the agreement governing our line of credit and term loan contains certain corporate level financial covenants, including leverage ratio, fixed charge coverage ratio, and tangible net worth thresholds. These

75

covenants may limit our ability to incur additional debt, to make borrowings under our line of credit, or to pay distributions. We were in compliance with all of our debt covenants as of December 31, 2020.

Offering Proceeds. As of December 31, 2020, aggregate gross proceeds raised since inception from our public offerings, including proceeds raised through our distribution reinvestment plan, were $1.49 billion ($1.40 billion net of direct selling costs). These proceeds include $528.2 million from the sale of 50.6 million shares of our common stock for the three months ended March 31, 2020. We believe that the increased pace at which we raised capital in early 2020 was primarily due to an influx of capital from IPT shareholders who determined to invest in our common shares following the receipt of a special distribution from IPT related to the completion of IPT’s asset sale in January 2020. Due to the unique nature of these circumstances, this increased pace was not sustained throughout 2020. We continued to steadily raise capital through December 31, 2020, with $440.4 million of new capital inflows during the remainder of 2020. In addition, due to the economic disruption created by the COVID-19 pandemic, we expect the pace of capital raising to be slower in the near term and to return to a pace more consistent with or slower than the pace we experienced during 2019.

Distributions. We intend to continue to accrue and make distributions on a regular basis. For the year ended December 31, 2020, approximately 1.4% of our total gross distributions were paid from cash flows from operating activities, as determined on a GAAP basis, and 98.6% of our total gross distributions were funded from sources other than cash flows from operating activities, as determined on a GAAP basis; specifically 20.2% of our total gross distributions were paid from cash provided by expense support from the Advisor, 28.6% were funded with proceeds from financing activities, and 49.8% of our total gross distributions were funded with proceeds from shares issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. Some or all of our future distributions may be paid from sources other than cash flows from operating activities, such as cash flows from financing activities, which include borrowings (including borrowings secured by our assets), proceeds from the issuance of shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, proceeds from sales of assets, cash resulting from a waiver or deferral of fees otherwise payable to the Advisor or its affiliates (including cash received pursuant to the Expense Support Agreement as described in “Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements”), interest income from our cash balances, and the net proceeds from primary shares sold in our public offerings. We have not established a cap on the amount of our distributions that may be paid from any of these sources. The amount of any distributions will be determined by our board of directors, and will depend on, among other things, current and projected cash requirements, tax considerations and other factors deemed relevant by our board.

For the first quarter of 2021, our board of directors authorized monthly distributions to all common stockholders of record as of the close of business on the last business day of each month for the first quarter of 2021, or January 29, 2021, February 26, 2021 and March 31, 2021 (each a “Distribution Record Date”). The distributions were authorized at a quarterly rate of (i) $0.13625 per Class I share of common stock and (ii) $0.13625 per Class T share and per Class W share of common stock, less the respective annual distribution fees that are payable monthly with respect to such Class T shares and Class W shares. This quarterly rate is equal to a monthly rate of (i) $0.04542 per Class I share of common stock and (ii) $0.04542 per Class T share and per Class W share of common stock, less the respective annual distribution fees that are payable with respect to such Class T shares and Class W shares. Distributions for each month of the first quarter of 2021 have been or will be paid in cash or reinvested in shares of our common stock for those electing to participate in our distribution reinvestment plan following the close of business on the respective Distribution Record Date applicable to such monthly distributions.

There can be no assurances that the current distribution rate or amount per share will be maintained. In the near-term, we expect that we may need to continue to rely on sources other than cash flows from operations, as determined on a GAAP basis, to pay distributions, which if insufficient could negatively impact our ability to pay such distributions. See “Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for further detail regarding the Expense Support Agreement.

76

The following table outlines sources used, as determined on a GAAP basis, to pay total gross distributions (which are paid in cash or reinvested in shares of our common stock through our distribution reinvestment plan (“DRIP”)) for the quarters ended as of the dates indicated below:

	Source of Distributions																		Total Cash
	Provided by				Provided by				Proceeds from										Flows from
	Expense				Operating				Financing				Proceeds from				Gross		Operating
($ in thousands)	Support (1)				Activities				Activities				DRIP (2)				Distributions (3)		Activities
2020
December 31,	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%	$	9,389	50.2	%	$	9,315	49.8	%	$	18,704	$	(3,438)
September 30,		—	—			344	2.0			8,209	48.3			8,451	49.7			17,004		344
June 30,		7,904	50.3			—	—			—	—			7,812	49.7			15,716		16,854
March 31,		4,534	44.6			547	5.4			—	—			5,077	50.0			10,158		1,816
Total	$	12,438	20.2	%	$	891	1.4	%	$	17,598	28.6	%	$	30,655	49.8	%	$	61,582	$	15,576
2019
December 31,	$	947	14.8	%	$	—	—	%	$	2,216	34.6	%	$	3,242	50.6	%	$	6,405	$	(2,147)
September 30,		1,776	31.2			1,057	18.5			—	—			2,866	50.3			5,699		4,019
June 30,		2,120	45.2			256	5.5			—	—			2,319	49.4			4,695		957
March 31,		1,295	36.6			503	14.2			—	—			1,744	49.2			3,542		3,624
Total	$	6,138	30.2	%	$	1,816	8.9	%	$	2,216	10.9	%	$	10,171	50.0	%	$	20,341	$	6,453

(1) For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Advisor provided expense support of $13.5 million and $6.1 million, respectively. Expense support from the Advisor used to pay distributions is presented above without the effect of our reimbursements to the Advisor of previously deferred fees and other expenses. We reimbursed the Advisor $13.5 million and $13.6 million during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. See “Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for further detail on the expense support from and reimbursement to the Advisor during the year.

(2) Stockholders may elect to have their distributions reinvested in shares of our common stock through our distribution reinvestment plan.

(3) Gross distributions are total distributions before the deduction of any distribution fees relating to Class T shares and Class W shares issued in the primary portion of our public offerings.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, our cash flows provided by operating activities on a GAAP basis were $15.6 million as compared to our aggregate total gross distributions declared (which are paid in cash or reinvested in shares issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan) of $61.6 million. For the year ended December 31, 2019, our cash flows provided by operating activities on a GAAP basis were $6.5 million as compared to our aggregate total gross distributions declared (which are paid in cash or reinvested in shares issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan) of $20.3 million.

Refer to “Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for further detail on our distributions.

Redemptions. For the year ended December 31, 2020, we received eligible redemption requests for approximately 0.5 million shares of our common stock, all of which we redeemed using cash flows from financing activities, for an aggregate amount of approximately $4.9 million, or an average price of $9.87 per share. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we received eligible redemption requests for approximately 0.2 million shares of our common stock, all of which we redeemed using cash flows from financing activities, for an aggregate amount of approximately $2.3 million, or an average price of $9.81 per share. See Part II, Item 5. “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities—Share Redemption Program,” for a description of our share redemption program.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Status of the Public Offerings

As of March 1, 2021, we had raised gross proceeds of $1.6 billion from the sale of 152.8 million shares of our common stock in our public offerings, including $50.0 million from the sale of 5.0 million shares of our common stock through our distribution reinvestment plan. Although we continued to steadily raise capital throughout 2020, we have noted a slight slowdown in capital raising, which we attribute primarily to the COVID-19 pandemic. In the future, we expect sales of our common shares to return to a pace more consistent with the pace we experienced during 2019. As of March 1, 2021, approximately $866.9 million in shares of our common stock remained available

77

for sale pursuant to our follow-on public offering in any combination of Class T shares, Class W shares and Class I shares, including approximately $458.3 million in shares of common stock available for sale through our distribution reinvestment plan, which may be reallocated for sale in the primary offering.

Completed Acquisitions

On January 8, 2021, we acquired one industrial building located in the D.C. / Baltimore market. The total purchase price was approximately $19.0 million, exclusive of transfer taxes, due diligence expenses, acquisition costs, and other closing costs.

Acquisitions Under Contract

We have entered into contracts to acquire properties with an aggregate contract purchase price of approximately $83.6 million, comprised of two industrial buildings and one land parcel. There can be no assurance that we will complete the acquisition of the properties under contract.

DST Program

We, through the Operating Partnership, intend to initiate a program to raise capital in private placements exempt from registration under Section 506(b) of the Securities Act through the sale of beneficial interests in specific Delaware statutory trusts holding real properties, including properties currently indirectly owned by the Operating Partnership.

Under the DST Program, each private placement will offer interests in one or more real properties placed into one or more Delaware statutory trust(s) by the Operating Partnership or its affiliates (the “DST Properties”). We anticipate that these interests may serve as replacement properties for investors seeking to complete like kind exchange transactions under Section 1031 of the Code. Additionally, underlying interests of properties that are sold to investors pursuant to such private placements will be leased back by an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership on a long term basis of up to 29 years. The lease agreements are expected to be fully guaranteed by the Operating Partnership. Additionally, the Operating Partnership will retain a fair market value purchase option giving it the right, but not the obligation, to acquire the beneficial interests in the Delaware statutory trusts from the investors at a later time in exchange for OP Units.

We expect that the DST Program will give us the opportunity to expand and diversify our capital raising and asset acquisition strategies by offering what we believe to be an attractive and unique investment product for investors that may be seeking replacement properties to complete like kind exchange transactions under Section 1031 of the Code. We expect to use the net proceeds of these private placements to make investments in accordance with our investment strategy and policies, to provide liquidity to our investors and for general corporate purposes (which may include repayment of our debt or any other corporate purposes we deem appropriate). The specific amounts of the net proceeds that are used for such purposes, and the priority of such uses, will depend on the amount and timing of receipts of such proceeds and what we deem to be the best use of such proceeds at such time.

In connection with the DST Program, Black Creek Industrial Exchange LLC (“BCIX”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of our taxable REIT subsidiary that is wholly-owned by the Operating Partnership, will enter into a dealer manager agreement with our Dealer Manager. Pursuant to the dealer manager agreement, the Dealer Manager agreed to conduct the private placements of up to $500 million of interests. BC Exchange Industrial Manager LLC (the “DST Manager”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of our Operating Partnership, will act, directly or through a wholly owned subsidiary, as the manager of each Delaware statutory trust holding a DST Property, but has assigned all of its rights and obligations as manager (including fees and reimbursements received) to BC Exchange Industrial Advisor LLC (the “DST Advisor”), an affiliate of the Advisor.

Further, in connection with the DST Program, our affiliate, BCIX will maintain a loan program and may, upon request, provide loans (the “DST Investor Loans” and, each individually, a “DST Investor Loan”) to certain purchasers of the interests in the Delaware Statutory Trusts (the “DST Interests”) to finance a portion of the purchase price payable upon their acquisition of such interests (the “Purchase Price”). The DST Investor Loans will be made by a newly formed entity (the “BCIX Lender”), which will be affiliated with us, the Operating Partnership and the DST Manager.

78

BTC I Partnership Agreement

Incentive Distributions Pursuant to BTC I Partnership Agreement

As disclosed in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by us on July 21, 2020 (the “Prior 8-K”), we, indirectly through certain of our subsidiaries, own a minority ownership interest in the BTC I Partnership. Specifically, our subsidiaries, IPT BTC I GP LLC (the “BTC I GP”) and IPT BTC I LP LLC (the “BTC I LP”), own a general partner interest and a minority limited partner interest, respectively, in the BTC I Partnership.

The Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the BTC I Partnership, dated as of December 31, 2016, and amended as of July 15, 2020, by and among the BTC I GP, the BTC I LP, Industrial Property Advisors Sub I LLC (the “BTC I SLP”), an affiliate of our Advisor, and QR Master Holdings USA II LP (the “BTC I Partnership Agreement”), contains procedures for making distributions to the parties, including incentive distributions to the BTC I GP and the BTC I SLP, which are subject to the achievement of certain return thresholds. The BTC I GP and the BTC I SLP agreed to split such incentive distributions such that BTC I SLP will receive 60% of the incentive distributions attributable to interests in BTC I which are not owned by the BTC I GP or the BTC I LP. The incentive distributions became due and payable in the fourth quarter of 2020. Our subsidiary, the BTC I GP, elected to receive its share of the incentive distribution as an increase of our interest in BTC I in lieu of a cash payment. The new percentage ownership interest of the BTC I GP in BTC I is described below under “—Amendment to the BTC I Partnership Agreement”. The BTC I SLP requested that a portion of its incentive distribution be issued as an increase of its interest in BTC I in lieu of a full redemption of its interest and a cash payment, and the parties to the BTC I Partnership Agreement amended the BTC I Partnership Agreement to accommodate this request, as described below.

Amendment to BTC I Partnership Agreement

The parties to the BTC I Partnership Agreement entered into a second amendment to the agreement on January 12, 2021 (the “Amendment”). Pursuant to the Amendment, effective as of December 22, 2020 (the “Effective Date”), a portion of the BTC I SLP’s incentive distribution in the amount of $16 million was issued as an increase of the BTC I SLP’s interest in the BTC I Partnership. As of the Effective Date, the BTC I GP owned an 8.9% interest, the BTC I LP owned a 17.9% interest, the BTC I SLP owned a 1.2% interest and the third party partner, QR Master Holdings USA II LP (the “QR Limited Partner”), owned a 72.0% interest in BTC I. The QR Limited Partner was previously assigned 100% of the interest held by the BCIMC Limited Partner, as defined in the Prior 8-K.

The Amendment also provides that the BTC I SLP will participate pro rata (based on its percentage interest) in any distributions of available cash and liquidating distributions. In addition, the BTC I SLP will be treated in the same manner as the BTC I LP for purposes of the rights of first offer, tag along rights, buy-sell and forced sale provisions of the BTC I Partnership Agreement, which were described in the Prior 8-K.

Pursuant to the Amendment, the QR Limited Partner and the BTC I SLP each have the right, on 15 days’ prior written notice, to cause BTC I to redeem the BTC I SLP’s interest. Until March 31, 2021, the redemption price will be $16 million. Thereafter, the redemption price will be the fair market value of the interest, determined based on the latest appraised value of BTC I’s assetsplus any capital contributions funded with respect to such assets since the appraised value was finalized, in each case adjusted to reflect any applicable distributions in connection with any capital transactions.

As also disclosed in the Prior 8-K, we entered in to an agreement (the “BTC I Services Agreement”) between the BTC I GP, the BTC I SLP, and the Advisor, pursuant to which the BTC I GP appointed the BTC I SLP to provide acquisition and asset management services and, to the extent applicable, development management and development oversight services (the “BTC I Advisory Services”) and assigned to the BTC I SLP the fees payable pursuant to the BTC I Partnership Agreement for providing the BTC I Advisory Services. In connection with the transactions described above, the BTC I SLP assigned its interest in the BTC I Services Agreement to Industrial Property Advisors Sub II LLC (the “BTC I Service Provider”), including, without limitation, the BTC I SLP’s obligations to provide services and right to receive fees under the agreement, with such assignment effective as of the Effective Date. The BTC I Service Provider is owned by an affiliate of the Advisor.

Dealer Manager Agreement

On February 16, 2021, we entered into the Amended and Restated Dealer Manager Agreement (the “A&R Dealer Manager Agreement”) with the Advisor and the Dealer Manager. The A&R Dealer Manager Agreement amends and restates the dealer manager agreement, dated as of September 5, 2019, by and among us, the Advisor and the Dealer Manager, to reduce the rate at which the distribution fee payable on Class T shares will be paid from 1.0% of NAV per annum to 0.85% of NAV per annum. The terms of the A&R Dealer Manager Agreement are otherwise substantially the same as the terms of the prior dealer manager agreement.

79

Share Redemption Program

Our share redemption program provides that we may redeem, during any calendar month, shares whose aggregate value (based on the price at which the shares are redeemed) is 2% of our aggregate NAV as of the last calendar day of the previous quarter and, during any calendar quarter, shares whose aggregate value (based on the price at which the shares are redeemed) is up to 5% of the Company’s aggregate NAV as of the last calendar day of the prior calendar quarter. On February 16, 2021, our board of directors approved the amended and restated share redemption program (the “Share Redemption Program”). The Share Redemption Program amends and restates the prior share redemption program in a manner which enhances the potential capacity for redemptions. Specifically, the Share Redemption Program provides that (i) if share redemptions are less than 2% in the first months of a given quarter, any unused capacity will carry over to the second month, and any unused capacity for the first two months will carry over to the third month; provided that redemptions in any given quarter will not exceed 5% of our aggregate NAV as of the last day of the prior quarter; and (ii) the redemption limitations will be based on net redemptions during a month or quarter, as applicable. The term “net redemptions” means, during the applicable period, the excess of share redemptions (capital outflows) over the proceeds from the sale of shares (capital inflows). Our board of directors may determine to change the measurement from net to gross redemptions with respect to a particular quarter in its discretion, but any such determination must be made with respect to the entire quarter. The Share Redemption Program has also been amended to eliminate the 2.5% early redemption deduction applicable to Class T Shares outstanding for at least one year but less than two years, such that the only early redemption deduction in place is a 5% early redemption deduction that will ordinarily apply to all shares that have been outstanding for less than one year. However, on February 16, 2021, our board of directors suspended the early redemption deduction on all redemptions effected from February 16, 2021 through at least September 30, 2021.

In addition, the Share Redemption Program includes new provisions regarding certain circumstances in which the early redemption deduction may be waived, as well as certain limitations that will be imposed on the Company’s ability to make new investments, increase the then-current distribution rate and pay the performance component of the advisory fee under the Advisory Agreement and the Partnership Agreement (defined below), in the event that the Company were ever to fail to satisfy 100% of properly submitted redemption requests for any consecutive 24-month period.

Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement

On February 16, 2021, the Company and the Operating Partnership entered into the Advisory Agreement with the Advisor. The Advisory Agreement amends and restates the Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement (2020) to, among other things, amend the calculation of the fixed component of the advisory fee. As amended, the fixed component of the advisory fee, which was previously a monthly fee in an amount equal to 1/12th of 0.80% of the aggregate cost of each real property asset within our portfolio, will be a monthly fee in an amount equal to 1/12th of 1.25% of (a) the applicable monthly NAV per Fund Interest times the weighted-average number of Fund Interests for such month and (b) the consideration received by the Company or its affiliates for selling interests in properties under the DST Program (defined below), net of up-front fees and expense reimbursements payable out of gross sale proceeds from the sale of such interests. “Fund Interests” are outstanding shares of our common stock and units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership held by third parties. In addition, the Advisory Agreement revised the circumstances under which the fixed component of the advisory fee will be paid in connection with a disposition, eliminating the payment of the fee in connection with one-off dispositions that do not result in a special distribution to our stockholders. As amended, the Advisory Agreement provides that the fee will be paid in connection with a disposition, which includes (i) a sale of any substantial portion of our assets, whether effectuated either directly or indirectly through the sale of any entity owning such assets, including, without limitation, the Company or the Operating Partnership, (ii) any sale, merger, or other transaction resulting in a special distribution to our stockholders, including, without limitation, any transaction in which our stockholders either receive, or have the option to receive, cash, securities redeemable for cash, and/or securities of a publicly traded company, or (iii) a listing or partial listing of our common stock on a national securities exchange. The fee to be paid in connection with a disposition will be equal to, as applicable, 1.0% of the total consideration paid and debt assumed and/or incurred in connection with a disposition described in clauses (i) and (ii) above or 1.0% of the gross market capitalization (reflective of total asset value) of the Company (or applicable portion thereof) upon the occurrence of a full or partial listing of our common stock on a national securities exchange. There is no disposition fee in connection with any dispositions that occur outside of a liquidity event transaction.

In addition, the Advisory Agreement also includes certain terms and provisions related to the facilitation of our planned launch of the DST Program, pursuant to which a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership intends to raise capital through the sale of beneficial interests in Delaware statutory trusts holding real properties, including properties currently indirectly owned by the Operating Partnership.

Seventh Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement

On February 16, 2021, in connection with the DST Program, we, on our own behalf as general partner and on behalf of the limited partners thereto, entered into the Seventh Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement (the “Operating Partnership Agreement”). The

80

Operating Partnership Agreement amends the prior limited partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership in order to facilitate the issuance of units of limited partnership interest in exchange for beneficial interests in Delaware statutory trusts issued pursuant to the DST Program. The Operating Partnership Agreement also establishes three series of Class T units of limited partnership interest, Series 1 Class T Units, Series 2 Class T Units and Series 3 Class T Units, in order to align with the interests that will be offered pursuant to the DST Program.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following table summarizes future obligations, due by period, as of December 31, 2020, under our various contractual obligations and commitments:

	Less than						More than
(in thousands)	1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		5 Years		Total
Debt (1)	$	14,667	$	29,054	$	462,029	$	136,824	$	642,574
Total	$	14,667	$	29,054	$	462,029	$	136,824	$	642,574

(1) Includes principal and interest on debt. See “Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for more detail.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

As of December 31, 2020, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material effect, on our financial condition, changes in our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, “Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40)” (“ASU 2020-06”), which updates various codification topics to simplify the accounting guidance for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity, with a specific focus on convertible instruments and the derivative scope exception for contracts in an entity’s own equity. ASU 2020-06 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2021, with early adoption permitted for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2020. We adopted this standard as of the reporting period beginning January 1, 2021. Our adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-01 “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)” (“ASU 2021-01”) to refine the scope of ASU 2020-04 and clarify the guidance as part of FASB’s ongoing monitoring of global reference rate reform activities. The ASU extends the guidance to provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to derivative contracts if certain criteria are met. The amendments only apply to derivative contracts that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. ASU 2021-01 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after March 12, 2020, with early adoption permitted, through December 31, 2022. The expedients and exceptions do not apply to derivative contracts entered into after December 31, 2022. We adopted this standard immediately upon its issuance. The adoption did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

INFLATION

Increases in the costs of owning and operating our properties due to inflation could reduce our net operating income to the extent such increases are not reimbursed or paid by our customers. Our leases may require our customers to pay certain taxes and operating expenses, either in part or in whole, or may provide for separate real estate tax and operating expense reimbursement escalations over a base amount. In addition, our leases provide for fixed base rent increases or indexed increases. As a result, most inflationary increases in costs may be at least partially offset by the contractual rent increases and operating expense reimbursement provisions or escalations.

81

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

Critical accounting estimates are those estimates that require management to make challenging, subjective, or complex judgments, often because they must estimate the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. Critical accounting estimates involve judgments and uncertainties that are sufficiently sensitive and may result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions.

Investment in Real Estate Properties

When we acquire a property, we first determine whether an acquisition constitutes a business or asset acquisition. Upon acquisition, we allocate the purchase price of the acquisition based upon our assessment of the fair value of various components, including to land, building, land and building improvements, and intangible lease assets and liabilities. Fair value determinations are based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize discount and/or capitalization rates, as well as certain available market information. The fair value of land, building, and land and building improvements considers the value of the property as if it were vacant. The fair value of intangible lease assets is based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each lease. Factors considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods, current market conditions and market rates, the customer’s credit quality and costs to execute similar leases. The fair value of above- and below-market leases is calculated as the present value of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and our estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, using a discount rate that reflects the risks associates with the leases acquired and measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed-rate renewal options for below-market leases. In estimating carrying costs, we include estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions. In estimating costs to execute similar leases, we consider customer improvements, leasing commissions and legal and other related expenses.

Impairment of Real Estate Properties

We review our investment in real estate properties individually whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recorded for the difference between estimated fair value of the real estate property and the carrying amount when the estimated future cash flows and the estimated liquidation value of the real estate property are less than the real estate property carrying amount. Our estimates of future cash flows and liquidation values require us to make assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for customers, changes in market rental rates, costs to operate each property, and expected ownership periods that can be difficult to predict.

ITEM 7A.      QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risk

We may be exposed to the impact of interest rate changes. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows, and optimize overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we plan to borrow on a fixed interest rate basis for longer-term debt and utilize interest rate swap agreements on certain variable interest rate debt in order to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on our results of operations. As of December 31, 2020, our consolidated debt outstanding consisted of borrowings under our term loan and mortgage notes.

Fixed Interest Rate Debt. As of December 31, 2020, our consolidated fixed interest rate debt consisted of $350.0 million under our term loan, which was effectively fixed through the use of interest swap agreements, and $167.8 million of principal borrowings under our mortgage notes. In total, our fixed rate debt represented approximately 88.8% of our total consolidated debt as of December 31, 2020. The impact of interest rate fluctuations on our consolidated fixed interest rate debt will generally not affect our future earnings or cash flows unless such borrowings mature, are otherwise terminated or payments are made on the principal balance. However, interest rate changes could affect the fair value of our fixed interest rate debt. As of December 31, 2020, the fair value and the carrying value of our consolidated fixed interest rate debt, excluding the values of hedges, were $519.3 million and $517.8 million, respectively. The fair value estimate of our fixed interest rate debt was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis utilizing rates we would expect to pay for debt of a similar type and remaining maturity if the loans were originated on December 31, 2020. Based on our debt as of December 31, 2020, we do not expect that market fluctuations in interest rates will have a significant impact on our future earnings or operating cash flows.

82

Variable Interest Rate Debt. As of December 31, 2020, our consolidated variable interest rate debt consisted of $65.0 million under our term loan, which represented 11.2% of our total consolidated debt. Interest rate changes on the variable portion of our consolidated variable-rate debt could impact our future earnings and cash flows but would not significantly affect the fair value of such debt. As of December 31, 2020, we were exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on $65.0 million of consolidated borrowings. A hypothetical 25 basis points increase in the all-in interest rate on the outstanding balance of our consolidated variable interest rate debt as of December 31, 2020, would increase our annual interest expense by approximately $0.2 million.

Derivative Instruments. As of December 31, 2020, we had seven outstanding interest rate swaps that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk, with a total notional amount of $350.0 million. See “Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for further detail on our interest rate swaps. We are exposed to credit risk of the counterparty to our interest rate swap agreements in the event of non-performance under the terms of the agreements. If we were not able to replace these swaps in the event of non-performance by the counterparty, we would be subject to variability of the interest rate on the amount outstanding under our term loan that is fixed through the use of the swaps.

83

ITEM 8.        FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes and financial statement schedule III (collectively, the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

Denver, Colorado

March 5, 2021

84

BLACK CREEK INDUSTRIAL REIT IV INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	As of December 31,
(in thousands, except per share data)	2020		2019
ASSETS
Net investment in real estate properties	$	1,322,521	$	878,721
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture partnerships		324,242		—
Cash and cash equivalents		232,369		51,178
Restricted cash		530		—
Straight-line and tenant receivables		10,396		4,590
Due from affiliates		3,308		153
Acquisition deposits		610		500
Other assets		3,452		3,631
Total assets	$	1,897,428	$	938,773
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	12,483	$	5,258
Debt, net		579,171		460,211
Due to affiliates		28,275		30,538
Distributions payable		6,450		2,241
Distribution fees payable to affiliates		44,962		16,467
Other liabilities		29,624		16,855
Total liabilities		700,965		531,570
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Redeemable noncontrolling interest		3,648		724
Equity
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value - 200,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding		—		—
Class T common stock, $0.01 par value per share - 1,200,000 shares authorized, 130,565 and 45,240 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		1,306		452
Class W common stock, $0.01 par value per share - 75,000 shares authorized, 7,866 and 2,736 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		79		27
Class I common stock, $0.01 par value per share - 225,000 shares authorized, 3,040 and 1,299 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		30		13
Additional paid-in capital		1,329,799		451,526
Accumulated deficit		(128,775)		(47,730)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income		(9,750)		2,190
Total stockholders’ equity		1,192,689		406,478
Noncontrolling interests		126		1
Total equity		1,192,815		406,479
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,897,428	$	938,773

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

85

BLACK CREEK INDUSTRIAL REIT IV INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share data)	2020		2019		2018
Revenues:
Rental revenues	$	79,396	$	40,377	$	6,520
Total revenues		79,396		40,377		6,520
Operating expenses:
Rental expenses		19,550		9,779		1,252
Real estate-related depreciation and amortization		46,483		22,236		3,541
General and administrative expenses		3,970		2,485		1,564
Advisory fees, related party		19,293		7,498		1,624
Acquisition costs and reimbursements		3,166		3,068		4,900
Other expense reimbursements, related party		3,003		1,963		1,195
Total operating expenses		95,465		47,029		14,076
Other (income) expenses:
Equity in loss from unconsolidated joint venture partnerships		1,790		—		—
Interest expense and other		12,316		8,290		2,250
Total expenses before expense support		109,571		55,319		16,326
Total (reimbursement to) expense support from the Advisor, net		—		(7,468)		5,583
Net expenses after reimbursement and expense support		(109,571)		(62,787)		(10,743)
Net loss		(30,175)		(22,410)		(4,223)
Net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest		83		42		—
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(5)		—		—
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(30,097)	$	(22,368)	$	(4,223)
Weighted-average shares outstanding		113,145		37,382		9,107
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(0.27)	$	(0.60)	$	(0.46)

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

86

BLACK CREEK INDUSTRIAL REIT IV INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

	For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2020		2019		2018
Net loss	$	(30,175)	$	(22,410)	$	(4,223)
Change from cash flow hedging derivatives		(11,999)		2,190		—
Comprehensive loss		(42,174)		(20,220)		(4,223)
Comprehensive loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests		142		4		—
Comprehensive loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(42,032)	$	(20,216)	$	(4,223)

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

87

BLACK CREEK INDUSTRIAL REIT IV INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

	Stockholders’ Equity
								Accumulated
								Other
	Common Stock			Additional		Accumulated		Comprehensive		Noncontrolling
(in thousands)	Shares	Amount		Paid-In Capital		Deficit		Income (Loss)		Interests		Total Equity
Balance as of December 31, 2017	1,238	$	12	$	10,859	$	(266)	$	—	$	1	$	10,606
Net loss	—		—		—		(4,223)		—		—		(4,223)
Issuance of common stock	19,090		191		199,879		—		—		—		200,070
Upfront offering costs, including selling commissions, dealer manager fees, and offering costs	—		—		(22,072)		—		—		—		(22,072)
Trailing distribution fees	—		—		(7,938)		875		—		—		(7,063)
Redemptions of common stock	(63)		—		(603)		—		—		—		(603)
Distributions to stockholders	—		—		—		(4,942)		—		—		(4,942)
Balance as of December 31, 2018	20,265	$	203	$	180,125	$	(8,556)	$	—	$	1	$	171,773
Net loss (excludes $42 attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest)	—		—		—		(22,368)		—		—		(22,368)
Change from cash flow hedging activities (excludes $4 attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest)	—		—		—		—		2,190		—		2,190
Issuance of common stock	29,243		292		304,691		—		—		—		304,983
Share-based compensation	—		—		465		—		—		—		465
Upfront offering costs, including selling commissions, dealer manager fees, and offering costs	—		—		(18,847)		—		—		—		(18,847)
Trailing distribution fees	—		—		(12,545)		3,535		—		—		(9,010)
Redemptions of common stock	(233)		(3)		(2,282)		—		—		—		(2,285)
Distributions to stockholders	—		—		—		(20,341)		—		—		(20,341)
Redemption value allocation adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling interest	—		—		(81)		—		—		—		(81)
Balance as of December 31, 2019	49,275	$	492	$	451,526	$	(47,730)	$	2,190	$	1	$	406,479
Net loss (excludes $83 attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest)	—		—		—		(30,097)		—		5		(30,092)
Change from cash flow hedging activities (excludes $59 attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest)	—		—		—		—		(11,940)		—		(11,940)
Issuance of common stock	92,689		928		967,663		—		—		—		968,591
Share-based compensation	—		—		1,544		—		—		—		1,544
Upfront offering costs, including selling commissions, dealer manager fees, and offering costs	—		—		(46,594)		—		—		—		(46,594)
Trailing distribution fees	—		—		(39,127)		10,634		—		—		(28,493)
Redemptions of common stock	(493)		(5)		(4,862)		—		—		—		(4,867)
Preferred interest in Subsidiary REITs	—		—		—		—		—		125		125
Distributions to stockholders	—		—		—		(61,582)		—		(5)		(61,587)
Redemption value allocation adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling interest	—		—		(351)		—		—		—		(351)
Balance as of December 31, 2020	141,471	$	1,415	$	1,329,799	$	(128,775)	$	(9,750)	$	126	$	1,192,815

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

88

BLACK CREEK INDUSTRIAL REIT IV INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

		For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)		2020		2019		2018
Operating activities:
Net loss		$	(30,175)	$	(22,410)	$	(4,223)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Real estate-related depreciation and amortization			46,483		22,236		3,541
Equity in loss from unconsolidated joint venture partnerships			1,790		—		—
Straight-line rent and amortization of above- and below-market leases			(7,744)		(4,420)		(1,673)
Other			2,553		1,416		557
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Tenant receivables and other assets			(140)		(825)		(133)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities			1,177		4,417		1,175
Due from / to affiliates, net			1,632		6,039		3,910
Net cash provided by operating activities			15,576		6,453		3,154
Investing activities:
Real estate acquisitions			(473,000)		(533,027)		(298,478)
Acquisition deposits			(610)		(500)		(675)
Capital expenditures			(8,930)		(3,376)		(800)
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture partnerships			(325,890)		—		—
Net cash used investing activities			(808,430)		(536,903)		(299,953)
Financing activities:
Proceeds from mortgage note			118,500		—		—
Proceeds from line of credit			—		377,000		203,000
Repayments of line of credit			(107,000)		(389,000)		(84,000)
Proceeds from term loan			107,500		307,500		—
Repayments of notes to shareholders			—		(376)		—
Debt issuance costs paid			(1,050)		(4,458)		(814)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock			900,810		283,803		189,309
Offering costs paid in connection with issuance of common stock			(10,333)		—		—
Distributions paid to common stockholders and to redeemable noncontrolling interest holders			(19,084)		(6,263)		(1,404)
Distribution fees paid to affiliates			(9,901)		(3,314)		(714)
Redemptions of common stock			(4,867)		(2,285)		(603)
Net cash provided by financing activities			974,575		562,607		304,774
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	���		181,721		32,157		7,975
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, at beginning of period			51,178		19,021		11,046
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, at end of period		$	232,899	$	51,178	$	19,021

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

89

BLACK CREEK INDUSTRIAL REIT IV INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc. (the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation formed on August 12, 2014. Unless the context otherwise requires, the “Company” and “BCI IV” refers to Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, which includes BCI IV Operating Partnership LP (the “Operating Partnership”).

The Company was formed to make equity and debt investments in income-producing real estate assets consisting primarily of high-quality distribution warehouses and other industrial properties that are leased to creditworthy corporate customers throughout the U.S. Creditworthiness does not necessarily mean investment grade and the majority of our customers do not have a public credit rating. Although the Company intends to focus investment activities primarily on distribution warehouses and other industrial properties, its charter and bylaws do not preclude it from investing in other types of commercial property, real estate debt, or real estate-related equity securities. As of December 31, 2020, the Company owned and managed, either directly or through its minority ownership interests in joint venture partnerships, a real estate portfolio that included 132 industrial buildings. The Company operates as one reportable segment comprised of industrial real estate.

The Company currently operates and has been elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 2017, and the Company intends to continue to operate in accordance with the requirements for qualification as a REIT. The Company utilizes an Umbrella Partnership Real Estate Investment Trust (“UPREIT”) organizational structure to hold all or substantially all of its properties and securities through the Operating Partnership, of which the Company is the sole general partner and a limited partner.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments and eliminations, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation in conformity with GAAP.

Basis of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, as well as amounts related to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests. See “Noncontrolling Interests” and “Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests” below for further detail concerning the accounting policies regarding noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected in the period they are determined to be necessary.

Investment in Real Estate Properties

The Company first determines whether an acquisition constitutes a business or asset acquisition. Upon either a business or asset acquisition, the purchase price of a property is allocated to land, building, and intangible lease assets and liabilities based on their relative fair value. The allocation of the purchase price to building is based on management’s estimate of the property’s “as-if” vacant fair value. The “as-if” vacant fair value is determined by using all available information such as the replacement cost of such asset, appraisals, property condition reports, market data and other related information. The allocation of the purchase price to intangible lease assets

90

represents the value associated with the in-place leases, which may include lost rent, leasing commissions, tenant improvements, legal and other related costs. The allocation of the purchase price to above-market lease assets and below-market lease liabilities results from in-place leases being above or below management’s estimate of fair market rental rates at the acquisition date and are measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the remaining term of the lease, plus the term of any below-market fixed-rate renewal option periods, if applicable, for below-market leases. Intangible lease assets, above-market lease assets, and below-market lease liabilities are collectively referred to as “intangible lease assets and liabilities.”

If any debt is assumed in an acquisition, the difference between the fair value and the face value of debt is recorded as a premium or discount and amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt assumed. No debt was assumed in connection with our 2020 acquisitions. During 2019, two debt instruments were assumed at fair value of $50.4 million. Transaction costs associated with the acquisition of a property are capitalized as incurred in an asset acquisition and are allocated to land, building, and intangible lease assets on a relative fair value basis. Properties that are probable to be sold are to be designated as “held for sale” on the balance sheet when certain criteria are met.

The results of operations for acquired properties are included in the consolidated statements of operations from their respective acquisition dates. Intangible lease assets are amortized to real estate-related depreciation and amortization over the remaining lease term. Above-market lease assets are amortized as a reduction in rental revenues over the remaining lease term and below-market lease liabilities are amortized as an increase in rental revenues over the remaining lease term, plus any applicable fixed-rate renewal option periods. The Company expenses any unamortized intangible lease asset or records an adjustment to rental revenue for any unamortized above-market lease asset or below-market lease liability when a customer terminates a lease before the stated lease expiration date.

Land, building, building and land improvements, tenant improvements, lease commissions, and intangible lease assets and liabilities, which are collectively referred to as “real estate assets,” are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Costs associated with the development and improvement of the Company’s real estate assets are capitalized as incurred. These costs include capitalized interest and development fees. Other than the transaction costs associated with the acquisition of a property described above, the Company does not capitalize any other costs, such as taxes, salaries or other general and administrative expenses. See “Capitalized Interest” below for additional detail. Costs incurred in making repairs and maintaining real estate assets are expensed as incurred.

Real estate-related depreciation and amortization are computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives as described in the following table:

Land	Not depreciated
Building	20 to 40 years
Building and land improvements	5 to 20 years
Tenant improvements	Lesser of useful life or lease term
Lease commissions	Over lease term
Intangible lease assets	Over lease term
Above-market lease assets	Over lease term
Below-market lease liabilities	Over lease term, including below-market fixed-rate renewal options

Real estate assets that are determined to be held and used will be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, and the Company will evaluate the recoverability of such real estate assets based on estimated future cash flows and the estimated liquidation value of such real estate assets, and provide for impairment if such undiscounted cash flows are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the real estate asset. If impaired, the real estate asset will be written down to its estimated fair value.

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture Partnerships

The Company analyzes its investment in an unconsolidated joint venture under GAAP to determine if the joint venture is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and whether the requisite substantial participating rights described in the GAAP are held by the partners not affiliated with the Company. If the joint venture is not a VIE and the partners not affiliated with the Company hold substantial participating rights, the Company accounts for its investment in the joint venture under the equity method. Under the equity method, the investment is initially recorded at cost (including direct acquisition costs) and subsequently adjusted to reflect the Company’s proportionate share of equity in the joint venture’s net income (loss), distributions received, contributions made and certain other adjustments made, as appropriate, which is

91

included in investment in unconsolidated joint venture partnerships on its consolidated balance sheets. The proportionate share of ongoing income or loss of the unconsolidated joint venture partnerships is recognized in equity in loss of unconsolidated joint venture partnerships on the consolidated statements of operations. The outside basis portion of the Company’s unconsolidated joint venture partnerships is amortized over the anticipated useful lives of the joint ventures’ tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

When circumstances indicate there may have been a reduction in the value of an equity investment, the Company evaluates whether the loss is other than temporary. If the Company concludes it is other than temporary, an impairment charge is recognized to reflect the equity investment at fair value. No impairment losses were recorded related to the Company’s investment in unconsolidated joint venture partnerships for the year ended December 31, 2020. See “Note 5” for additional information regarding the Company’s investment in unconsolidated joint venture partnerships.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. The Company may have bank balances in excess of federally insured amounts; however, the Company deposits its cash and cash equivalents with high credit-quality institutions to minimize credit risk.

Derivative Instruments

The Company records its derivative instruments at fair value. The accounting for changes in fair value of derivative instruments depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as a hedge and, if so, the type of hedge. The Company’s interest rate swap derivative instruments are designated as cash flow hedges and are used to hedge exposure to variability in expected future interest payments. The change in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the consolidated balance sheets and is subsequently reclassified into earnings as interest expense for the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings, which is when the interest expense is recognized on the related debt. The Company does not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Debt Issuance Costs

Debt issuance costs include fees and costs incurred to obtain long-term financing. These fees and costs are amortized to interest expense over the terms of the related credit facilities. Unamortized debt issuance costs are written off if debt is retired before its maturity date. Accumulated amortization of debt issuance costs was approximately $2.9 million and $1.7 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the Company’s interest expense included approximately $1.2 million, $1.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of amortization of financing costs.

Capitalized Interest

The Company capitalizes interest as a cost of development on value-add buildings. Capitalization of interest for a particular asset begins when activities necessary to get the asset ready for its intended use are in progress and when interest costs have been incurred. Capitalization of interest ceases when the project is substantially complete and ready for occupancy. For the year ended December 31, 2020, approximately $0.6 million of interest was capitalized. No interest was capitalized for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Distribution Fees

Distribution fees are paid monthly. Distribution fees are accrued upon the issuance of Class T shares and Class W shares in the primary portion of the Company’s public offerings. The Company accrues for: (i) the monthly amount payable as of the balance sheet date, and (ii) the estimated amount of distribution fees to be paid in future periods based on the Class T shares and Class W shares outstanding as of the balance sheet date. The accrued distribution fees are reflected in additional paid-in capital in stockholders’ equity. See “Note 10” for additional information regarding when distribution fees become payable.

Noncontrolling Interests

Due to the Company’s control of the Operating Partnership through its sole general partner interest and its limited partner interest, the Company consolidates the Operating Partnership. The limited partner interests not owned by the Company are presented as noncontrolling

92

interests in the consolidated financial statements. The noncontrolling interests are reported on the consolidated balance sheets within permanent equity, separate from stockholders’ equity. As the limited partner interests do not participate in the profits and losses of the Operating Partnership, there is no net income or loss attributable to this portion of noncontrolling interests on the consolidated statement of operations.

Noncontrolling interests also represent the portion of equity in an acquired subsidiary real estate investment trust (“Subsidiary REIT”), that the Company does not own. Such noncontrolling interests are equity instruments presented in the consolidated balance sheet as noncontrolling interests within permanent equity. See “Note 12” for additional information regarding the Subsidiary REIT.

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest

BCI IV Advisors Group LLC (the “Sponsor”) holds, either directly or indirectly, partnership units in the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”), which were issued as payment of the performance component of the advisory fee pursuant to the amended and restated advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) by and among the Company, the Operating Partnership and BCI IV Advisors LLC (the “Advisor”). The Company has classified these OP Units as redeemable noncontrolling interest in mezzanine equity on the consolidated balance sheets due to the fact that, as defined in the operating partnership agreement, the Sponsor has the ability to transfer or redeem its OP units at the election of the Sponsor. The redeemable noncontrolling interest is recorded at the greater of the carrying amount, adjusted for its share of the allocation of income or loss and dividends, or the redemption value, which is equivalent to fair value, of such OP units at the end of each measurement period.

Rental Revenue

When a lease is entered into, the Company first determines if the collectability from the tenant is probable. If the collectability is not probable the Company recognizes revenue when the payment has been received. If the collectability is determined to be probable the Company records rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the full lease term. Certain properties have leases that offer the tenant a period of time where no rent is due or where rent payments change during the term of the lease. Accordingly, the Company records receivables from tenants for rent that the Company expects to collect over the remaining lease term rather than currently, which are recorded as a straight-line rent receivable. Management analyzes accounts receivable by considering customer creditworthiness, current economic trends, including the impact of the outbreak of the current novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on customers’ businesses, and customers’ ability to make payments on time and in full when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2020, the impact of COVID-19 on customer collectability has been minimal and has not had a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. The Company evaluates collectability from its tenants on an ongoing basis, if the assessment of collectability changes during the lease term, any difference between the revenue that was recognized under the straight-line method and the lease payments that have been collected will be recognized as a current period adjustment to rental revenues. When the Company acquires a property, the term of each existing lease is considered to commence as of the acquisition date for purposes of this calculation. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company has no allowance for doubtful accounts.

In connection with property acquisitions, the Company may acquire leases with rental rates above or below estimated market rental rates. Above-market lease assets are amortized as a reduction to rental revenue over the remaining lease term, and below-market lease liabilities are amortized as an increase to rental revenue over the remaining lease term, plus any applicable fixed-rate renewal option periods.

The Company expenses any unamortized intangible lease asset or records an adjustment to rental revenue for any unamortized above-market lease asset or below-market lease liability by reassessing the estimated remaining useful life of such intangible lease asset or liability when it becomes probable a customer will terminate a lease before the stated lease expiration date.

Upon the disposition of an asset, the Company will evaluate the transaction to determine if control of the asset, as well as other specified criteria, has been transferred to the buyer to determine proper timing of recognizing gains or losses.

Organization and Offering Expenses

Organization costs are expensed as incurred and offering expenses associated with the Company’s public offerings are recorded as a reduction of gross offering proceeds in additional paid-in capital. See “Note 10” for additional information regarding organization and offering expenses.

93

Income Taxes

The Company elected under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, to be taxed as a REIT beginning with the year ended December 31, 2017. As a REIT, the Company generally is not subject to federal income taxes on net income it distributes to stockholders. The Company intends to make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy the annual distribution requirements. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property and federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

The Company computes net income (loss) per common share by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period for each class. There are no class specific expenses and each class of common stock shares equally in the profits and losses of the Company. There were no dilutive shares for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents. At times, balances with any one financial institution may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. The Company believes it mitigates this risk by investing its cash with high-credit quality financial institutions. As the Company’s revenues predominantly consist of rental payments, it is dependent on its customers for its source of revenues. Concentration of credit risk arises when its source of revenue is highly concentrated from certain of its customers. As of December 31, 2020, no customers represented more than 10.0% of total annualized base rent of its consolidated properties, nor more than 10.0% of the combined total aggregate annualized base rent of its consolidated and unconsolidated properties (assuming 100% ownership of its unconsolidated properties).

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value measurements are determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Fair value measurements are categorized into one of three levels of the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of significant input used. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. Considerable judgment and a high degree of subjectivity are involved in developing these estimates. These estimates may differ from the actual amounts that the Company could realize upon settlement.

The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Level 1—Quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Other observable inputs, either directly or indirectly, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, including:

● Quoted prices for similar assets/liabilities in active markets;

● Quoted prices for identical or similar assets/liabilities in non-active markets (e.g., few transactions, limited information, non-current prices, high variability over time);

● Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset/liability (e.g., interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, default rates); and

● Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by other observable market data.

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data.

94

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), which eliminates certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and requires new or modified disclosures. The Company applied this standard beginning in August 2019, upon entering into its interest rate swap agreements, which made this standard applicable to the Company for the first time. The amendments to ASU 2018-13 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2020-03, “Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments” (“ASU 2020-03”), which updates various codification topics related to financial instruments by clarifying or improving the disclosure requirements to align with the SEC’s regulations. The Company adopted this standard immediately upon its issuance. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)” (“ASU 2020-04”), which provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The amendments only apply to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. ASU 2020-04 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after March 12, 2020, with early adoption permitted, through December 31, 2022. The expedients and exceptions do not apply to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into after December 31, 2022. The Company adopted this standard immediately upon its issuance. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2020, the FASB issued a Staff Question-and-Answer document to clarify whether lease concessions related to the effects of COVID-19 require the application of lease modification guidance under ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Subtopic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”), which the Company adopted on January 1, 2019. The guidance did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. However, its future impact to the Company is dependent upon the extent of lease concessions granted to customers as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in future periods and the elections made by the Company at the time of entering such concessions. It is not possible at this time to accurately project the nature or extent of any such possible future concessions.

In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-10, “Codification Improvements” (“ASU 2020-10”), which updates various codification topics by clarifying or improving disclosure requirements to align with the SEC’s regulations. The Company adopted this standard immediately upon its issuance. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, “Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40)” (“ASU 2020-06”), which updates various codification topics to simplify the accounting guidance for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity, with a specific focus on convertible instruments and the derivative scope exception for contracts in an entity’s own equity. ASU 2020-06 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2021, with early adoption permitted for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company adopted this standard as of the reporting period beginning January 1, 2021. The Company’s adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-01 “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)” (“ASU 2021-01”) to refine the scope of ASU 2020-04 and clarify the guidance as part of FASB’s ongoing monitoring of global reference rate reform activities. The ASU extends the guidance to provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to derivative contracts if certain criteria are met. The amendments only apply to derivative contracts that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. ASU 2021-01 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after March 12, 2020, with early adoption permitted, through December 31, 2022. The expedients and exceptions do not apply to derivative contracts entered into after December 31, 2022. The Company adopted this standard immediately upon its issuance. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

95

3. REAL ESTATE ACQUISITIONS

During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company acquired 100% of the following properties, which were determined to be asset acquisitions:

		Number of	Total Purchase
($ in thousands)	Acquisition Date	Buildings	Price (1)
2020 Acquisitions:
Norcross Industrial Center	3/23/2020	1	$	9,505
Port 146 Distribution Center	4/14/2020	1		9,571
Lima Distribution Center	4/15/2020	1		11,622
Valwood Crossroads	5/11/2020	2		69,999
Eaglepoint Logistics Center	5/26/2020	1		40,216
7A Distribution Center II	5/27/2020	1		23,218
Legacy Logistics Center	6/3/2020	1		39,718
Logistics Center at 33	6/4/2020	1		63,285
Intermodal Logistics Center	6/29/2020	1		28,628
Executive Airport II & III	9/3/2020	2		33,200
Airpark International Logistics Center	10/9/2020	2		30,201
Carlstadt Industrial Center	11/10/2020	2		37,530
Nelson Industrial Center	12/7/2020	1		9,032
Miraloma Industrial Center	12/10/2020	1		9,498
Pennsy Logistics Center	12/18/2020	2		60,097
Total Acquisitions		20	$	475,320
2019 Acquisitions:
Airport Industrial Center	1/8/2019	1	$	8,136
Kelly Trade Center	1/31/2019	1		15,340
7A Distribution Center	2/11/2019	1		12,151
Quakerbridge Distribution Center	3/11/2019	1		8,594
Hebron Airpark Logistics Center	5/30/2019	1		11,800
Las Vegas Light Industrial Portfolio	5/30/2019	4		59,271
Monte Vista Industrial Center	6/7/2019	1		15,539
King of Prussia Core Infill Portfolio	6/21/2019	5		31,978
Dallas Infill Industrial Portfolio (2)	6/28/2019	5		116,055
Edison Distribution Center	6/28/2019	1		27,598
395 Distribution Center	8/5/2019	2		54,018
I-80 Distribution Center	9/4/2019	4		72,009
Avenue B Industrial Center	9/11/2019	1		7,113
485 Distribution Center	9/13/2019	1		43,059
Weston Business Center	12/10/2019	1		32,411
Marigold Distribution Center	12/20/2019	1		39,735
Bishops Gate Distribution Center	12/31/2019	1		32,226
Total Acquisitions		32	$	587,033

(1) Total purchase price is equal to the total consideration paid plus any debt assumed at fair value. There was no debt assumed in connection with the 2020 acquisitions.

(2) Total purchase price includes debt assumed at fair value as of the acquisition date of $50.4 million, with a principal amount of $49.3 million.

96

During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company allocated the purchase price of its acquisitions to land, building and improvements, and intangible lease assets and liabilities as follows:

	For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2020		2019
Land	$	124,368	$	170,533
Building and improvements		313,833		373,414
Intangible lease assets		38,954		50,983
Above-market lease assets		2,438		1,260
Below-market lease liabilities		(4,273)		(9,157)
Total purchase price (1)	$	475,320	$	587,033

(1) Total purchase price is equal to the total consideration paid plus any debt assumed at fair value. There was no debt assumed in connection with the 2020 acquisitions. Total purchase price for the year ended December 31, 2019 includes debt assumed at fair value as of the acquisition date of $50.4 million, with a principal amount of $49.3 million.

Intangible and above-market lease assets are amortized over the remaining lease term. Below-market lease liabilities are amortized over the remaining lease term, plus any below-market, fixed-rate renewal option periods. The weighted-average amortization periods for the intangible lease assets and liabilities acquired in connection with the Company’s acquisitions during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, as of the respective date of each acquisition, was 5.9 years and 4.9 years, respectively.

4. INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company’s consolidated investment in real estate properties consisted of 65 and 45 industrial buildings, respectively.

	As of December 31,
(in thousands)	2020		2019
Land	$	385,988	$	261,620
Building and improvements		885,489		564,669
Intangible lease assets		119,765		77,294
Construction in progress		4,203		1,126
Investment in real estate properties		1,395,445		904,709
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(72,924)		(25,988)
Net investment in real estate properties	$	1,322,521	$	878,721

Intangible Lease Assets and Liabilities

Intangible lease assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 included the following:

	As of December 31, 2020						As of December 31, 2019
			Accumulated						Accumulated
(in thousands)	Gross		Amortization		Net		Gross		Amortization		Net
Intangible lease assets (1)	$	115,821	$	(32,699)	$	83,122	$	75,787	$	(11,734)	$	64,053
Above-market lease assets (1)		3,944		(694)		3,250		1,507		(211)		1,296
Below-market lease liabilities (2)		(17,471)		5,862		(11,609)		(13,199)		2,494		(10,705)

(1) Included in net investment in real estate properties on the consolidated balance sheets.

(2) Included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

97

The following table details the estimated net amortization of such intangible lease assets and liabilities, as of December 31, 2020, for the next five years and thereafter:

	Estimated Net Amortization
	Intangible		Above-Market		Below-Market
(in thousands)	Lease Assets		Lease Assets		Lease Liabilities
Year 1	$	21,456	$	717	$	3,223
Year 2		17,023		662		2,421
Year 3		13,661		593		1,654
Year 4		10,456		450		1,256
Year 5		6,883		391		911
Thereafter		13,643		437		2,144
Total	$	83,122	$	3,250	$	11,609

Future Minimum Rent

Future minimum base rental payments, which equal the cash basis of monthly contractual rent, owed to the Company from its customers under the terms of non-cancelable operating leases in effect as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, excluding rental revenues from the potential renewal or replacement of existing leases, were as follows for the next five years and thereafter:

	As of December 31,
(in thousands)	2020
Year 1	$	67,019
Year 2		62,259
Year 3		55,531
Year 4		46,302
Year 5		33,672
Thereafter		69,303
Total	$	334,086

Rental Revenue Adjustments and Depreciation and Amortization Expense

The following table summarizes straight-line rent adjustments, amortization recognized as an increase (decrease) to rental revenues from above-and below-market lease assets and liabilities, and real estate-related depreciation and amortization expense:

	For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2020		2019		2018
Increase (Decrease) to Rental Revenue:
Straight-line rent adjustments	$	4,859	$	2,703	$	1,106
Above-market lease amortization		(483)		(196)		(15)
Below-market lease amortization		3,368		1,913		582
Real Estate-Related Depreciation and Amortization:
Depreciation expense	$	25,489	$	11,952	$	2,091
Intangible lease asset amortization		20,994		10,284		1,450

98

5. INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIPS

On July 15, 2020, the Company acquired, from a subsidiary of Industrial Property Trust (“IPT”), interests in two joint venture partnerships with third party investors for purposes of investing in industrial properties located in certain major U.S. distribution markets. The Company reports its investments in the Build-To-Core Industrial Partnership I LP (the “BTC I Partnership”) and the Build-To-Core Industrial Partnership II LP (the “BTC II Partnership” and, together with the BTC I Partnership, the “BTC Partnerships”) under the equity method on its consolidated balance sheets as the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence in each partnership but does not have control of the entities. See “Note 10” for further discussion of the transaction. The following table summarizes the Company’s investment in the BTC Partnerships:

	As of						Investment in Unconsolidated
	December 31, 2020			December 31, 2019			Joint Venture Partnerships as of
	Ownership		Number of	Ownership		Number of	December 31,		December 31,
($ in thousands)	Percentage		Buildings (1)	Percentage		Buildings (1)	2020		2019
BTC I Partnership	26.8	%	42	0.0	%	—	$	279,108	$	—
BTC II Partnership	8.0	%	25	0.0	%	—		45,134		—
Total BTC Partnerships			67			—	$	324,242	$	—

(1) Represents acquired or completed buildings.

As of December 31, 2020, the book value of the Company’s investment in the BTC Partnerships was $324.2 million, which includes $151.2 million of outside basis difference. The outside basis difference represents the difference between the purchase price paid by the Company for the minority ownership interests in the joint venture partnerships, which was based on fair value, and the book value of the Company’s share of the underlying net assets and liabilities of the joint venture partnerships. This difference originated from the fair value of the real estate and noncurrent nonfinancial assets at acquisition.

The following is a summary of certain balance sheet and operating data of the BTC I Partnership:

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2020		2019		2018
Operating data:
Total revenues	$	75,429	$	62,243	$	47,169
Total operating expenses		54,282		44,523		35,884
Total other (expenses) income (1)		(13,715)		5,135		34,031
Net income		7,432		22,855		45,316

	As of December 31,
(in thousands)	2020		2019
Balance sheet data:
Net investment in properties	$	1,123,551	$	1,064,499
Cash and cash equivalents		25,157		23,393
Total assets		1,174,236		1,108,795
Debt, net		622,092		580,588
Total liabilities		667,489		609,465
Partners' capital		506,625		499,198

(1) Includes a gain of $17.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 related to the disposal of four industrial buildings and a gain of $39.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 related to the disposal of eight industrial buildings. There were no dispositions during the year ended December 31, 2020.

99

6. DEBT

The Company’s consolidated indebtedness is currently comprised of borrowings under its term loan and mortgage notes. Borrowings under the non-recourse mortgage notes are secured by mortgages or deeds of trust and related assignments and security interests in collateralized and certain cross-collateralized properties, which are generally owned by single purpose entities. A summary of the Company’s debt is as follows:

	Weighted-Average Effective
	Interest Rate as of					Balance as of
	December 31,		December 31,			December 31,		December 31,
($ in thousands)	2020		2019		Maturity Date	2020		2019
Line of credit (1)	1.44	%	3.26	%	November 2023	$	—	$	107,000
Term loan (2)	2.23		2.85		February 2024		415,000		307,500
Fixed-rate mortgage notes (3)	3.14		3.71		August 2024 - December 2027		167,750		49,250
Total principal amount / weighted-average (4)	2.49	%	3.04	%		$	582,750	$	463,750
Less unamortized debt issuance costs						$	(4,430)	$	(4,602)
Add mark-to-market adjustment on assumed debt, net							851		1,063
Total debt, net						$	579,171	$	460,211
Gross book value of properties encumbered by debt						$	299,318	$	117,049

(1) The effective interest rate is calculated based on either: (i) the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a margin ranging from 1.30% to 2.10%; or (ii) an alternative base rate plus a margin ranging from 0.30% to 1.10%, each depending on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio. Customary fall-back provisions apply if LIBOR is unavailable. The line of credit is available for general corporate purposes including, but not limited to, the acquisition and operation of permitted investments by the Company. As of December 31, 2020, total commitments for the line of credit were $315.0 million, the unused portion under the line of credit was $314.9 million, of which $308.0 million was available.

(2) The effective interest rate is calculated based on either (i) LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.25% to 2.05%; or (ii) an alternative base rate plus a margin ranging from 0.25% to 1.05%, depending on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio. The weighted-average effective interest rate is the all-in interest rate, including the effects of interest rate swap agreements. As of December 31, 2020, total commitments for the term loan were $415.0 million. This term loan is available for general corporate purposes including, but not limited to, the acquisition and operation of permitted investments by the Company.

(3) Interest rates range from 2.90% to 3.75%. The assets and credit of each of the Company’s consolidated properties pledged as collateral for the Company’s mortgage notes are not available to satisfy the Company’s other debt and obligations, unless the Company first satisfies the mortgage notes payable on the respective underlying properties.

(4) The weighted-average remaining term of the Company’s consolidated debt was approximately 4.0 years as of December 31, 2020, excluding any extension options on the line of credit.

As of December 31, 2020, the principal payments due on the Company’s consolidated debt during each of the next five years and thereafter were as follows:

(in thousands)	Line of Credit (1)		Term Loan		Mortgage Notes		Total
2021	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
2022		—		—		—		—
2023		—		—		—		—
2024		—		415,000		38,000		453,000
2025		—		—		—		—
Thereafter		—		—		129,750		129,750
Total principal payments	$	—	$	415,000	$	167,750	$	582,750

(1) The line of credit matures in November 2023 and the term may be extended pursuant to a one-year extension option, subject to certain conditions.

100

In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) that regulates LIBOR announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR. As a result, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York organized the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”), which identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as its preferred alternative rate for LIBOR in derivatives and other financial contracts. The Company is not able to predict when LIBOR will cease to be available or when there will be sufficient liquidity in the SOFR markets. Any changes adopted by the FCA or other governing bodies in the method used for determining LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR. If that were to occur, our interest payment could change. In addition, uncertainty about the extent and manner of future changes may result in interest rate and/or payments that are higher or lower than if LIBOR were to remain available in the current form.

LIBOR is expected to be phased out or modified by June 2023, and the writing of contracts using LIBOR is expected to stop by the end of 2021. As of December 31, 2020, our term loan is our only consolidated indebtedness with maturity beyond 2023 that has exposure to LIBOR. The agreement governing the term loan provides procedures for determining a replacement or alternative base rate in the event that LIBOR is discontinued. However, there can be no assurances as to whether such replacement or alternative base rate will be more or less favorable than LIBOR. As of December 31, 2020, we have interest rate swaps in place to hedge LIBOR on $350.0 million of commitments under our term loan. We intend to monitor the developments with respect to the potential phasing out of LIBOR after 2023 and work with our lenders to seek to ensure any transition away from LIBOR will have minimal impact on our financial condition, but can provide no assurances regarding the impact of the discontinuation of LIBOR.

Debt Covenants

The Company’s line of credit, term loan and mortgage note agreements contain various property-level covenants, including customary affirmative and negative covenants. In addition, the line of credit and term loan agreements contain certain corporate level financial covenants, including leverage ratio, fixed charge coverage ratio, and tangible net worth thresholds. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of December 31, 2020.

Derivative Instruments

To manage interest rate risk for certain of its variable-rate debt, the Company uses interest rate swaps as part of its risk management strategy. These derivatives are designed to mitigate the risk of future interest rate increases by providing a fixed interest rate for a limited, pre-determined period of time. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the interest rate swap agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Certain of the Company’s variable-rate borrowings are not hedged, and therefore, to an extent, the Company has on-going exposure to interest rate movements.

For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the gain or loss is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) on the consolidated balance sheets and is reclassified into earnings as interest expense for the same period that the hedged transaction affects earnings, which is when the interest expense is recognized on the related debt. The gain or loss on the derivative instrument is presented in the same line item on the consolidated statement of operations as the earnings effect of the hedged item.

During the next 12 months, the Company estimates that approximately $3.6 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense related to active effective hedges of existing floating-rate debt.

The following table summarizes the location and fair value of the cash flow hedges on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019:

	Number of	Notional		Balance Sheet	Fair
($ in thousands)	Contracts	Amount		Location	Value
As of December 31, 2020
Interest rate swaps	7	$	350,000	Other liabilities	$	(9,809)
As of December 31, 2019
Interest rate swaps	4	$	200,000	Other assets	$	2,190

101

The following table presents the effect of the Company’s cash flow hedges on the Company’s consolidated financial statements:

	For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2020		2019		2018
Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
(Loss) gain recognized in AOCI	$	(14,140)	$	2,642	$	—
Amount reclassified from AOCI into interest expense		2,141		(452)		—
Total interest expense and other presented in the consolidated statements of operations in which the effects of the cash flow hedges are recorded		12,316		8,290		—

7. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company estimates the fair value of its financial instruments using available market information and valuation methodologies it believes to be appropriate for these purposes. Considerable judgment and a high degree of subjectivity are involved in developing these estimates and, accordingly, they are not necessarily indicative of amounts that the Company would realize upon disposition of its financial instruments.

Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis

The following table presents the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2020 and 2019:

							Total
(in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair Value
As of December 31, 2020
Liabilities
Derivative instruments	$	—	$	(9,809)	$	—	$	(9,809)
Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	—	$	(9,809)	$	—	$	(9,809)
As of December 31, 2019
Assets
Derivative instruments	$	—	$	2,190	$	—	$	2,190
Total assets measured at fair value	$	—	$	2,190	$	—	$	2,190

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument:

Derivative Instruments. The derivative instruments are interest rate swaps. The interest rate swaps are standard cash flow hedges whose fair value is estimated using market-standard valuation models. Such models involve using market-based observable inputs, including interest rate curves. The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements, which the Company has concluded are not material to the valuation. Due to the interest rate swaps being unique and not actively traded, the fair value is classified as Level 2. See “Note 6” above for further discussion of the Company’s derivative instruments.

102

Nonrecurring Fair Value of Financial Measurements

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, tenant receivables, prepaid expenses, other assets, due from/to affiliates, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and distributions payable approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The table below includes fair values for certain of the Company’s financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. The carrying values and fair values of these financial instruments were as follows:

	As of December 31, 2020				As of December 31, 2019
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
(in thousands)	Value (1)		Value		Value (1)		Value
Line of credit	$	—	$	—	$	107,000	$	107,000
Term loan		415,000		411,787		307,500		307,500
Fixed rate mortgage notes		167,750		172,008		49,250		50,326

(1) The carrying value reflects the principal amount outstanding.

8. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Public Offerings

On February 18, 2016, the SEC declared the Company’s registration statement for its initial public offering of up to $2.0 billion of shares of its common stock effective. On September 5, 2019, the Company’s initial public offering was terminated immediately upon effectiveness of the Company’s registration statement for its follow-on public offering of up to $2.0 billion of shares of its common stock, and the follow-on public offering commenced the same day. Under the follow-on public offering, the Company is offering up to $1.5 billion of shares of its common stock in the primary offering and up to $500.0 million of shares of its common stock pursuant to its distribution reinvestment plan, in any combination of Class T shares, Class W shares and Class I shares. The Company may reallocate amounts between the primary offering and distribution reinvestment plan. The Company’s follow-on public offering is a continuous offering that will end no later than September 5, 2021, unless extended in accordance with federal and state securities laws. Black Creek Capital Markets, LLC (the “Dealer Manager”), a related party, provides dealer manager services in connection with the Company’s public offerings.

The Class T shares, Class W shares, and Class I shares, all of which are collectively referred to herein as shares of common stock, have identical rights and privileges, including identical voting rights, but have differing fees that are payable on a class-specific basis. The per share amount of distributions paid on Class T shares and Class W shares will be lower than the per share amount of distributions paid on Class I shares because of the distribution fees payable with respect to Class T shares and Class W shares sold in the primary offering.

Pursuant to its public offerings, the Company offered and continues to offer shares of its common stock at the “transaction price,” plus applicable selling commissions and dealer manager fees. The “transaction price” generally is equal to the net asset value (“NAV”) per share of the Company’s common stock most recently disclosed. The Company’s NAV per share is calculated as of the last calendar day of each month for each of its outstanding classes of stock, and will be available generally within 15 calendar days after the end of the applicable month. Shares issued pursuant to the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan are offered at the transaction price, as indicated above, in effect on the distribution date. The Company may update a previously disclosed transaction price in cases where the Company believes there has been a material change (positive or negative) to its NAV per share relative to the most recently disclosed monthly NAV per share.

103

Summary of the Public Offerings

A summary of the Company’s public offerings, including shares sold through the primary offering and the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan (“DRIP”), as of December 31, 2020, is as follows:

(in thousands)	Class T		Class W		Class I		Total
Amount of gross proceeds raised:
Primary offering	$	1,340,612	$	78,144	$	26,991	$	1,445,747
DRIP		37,207		1,926		952		40,085
Total offering	$	1,377,819	$	80,070	$	27,943	$	1,485,832
Number of shares issued:
Primary offering		127,452		7,770		2,704		137,926
DRIP		3,699		192		95		3,986
Stock grants		—		6		3		9
Total offering		131,151		7,968		2,802		141,921

As of December 31, 2020, approximately $980.8 million in shares of common stock remained available for sale pursuant to the Company’s follow-on public offerings in any combination of Class T, Class W and Class I shares, including approximately $468.3 million in shares of common stock available for sale through the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan, which may be reallocated for sale in the primary offering.

Common Stock

The following table summarizes the changes in the shares outstanding for each class of common stock for the periods presented below:

	Class T	Class W	Class I	Total
(in thousands)	Shares	Shares	Shares (1)	Shares
Balance as of December 31, 2017	976	6	256	1,238
Issuance of common stock:
Primary shares	18,643	154	97	18,894
DRIP	189	1	6	196
Redemptions	(49)	—	(14)	(63)
Balance as of December 31, 2018	19,759	161	345	20,265
Issuance of common stock:
Primary shares	24,705	2,584	935	28,224
DRIP	887	36	20	943
Stock grants	—	—	76	76
Redemptions	(111)	(45)	(77)	(233)
Balance as of December 31, 2019	45,240	2,736	1,299	49,275
Issuance of common stock:
Primary shares	83,136	5,032	1,451	89,619
DRIP	2,622	155	64	2,841
Stock grants	—	—	229	229
Redemptions	(433)	(57)	(3)	(493)
Balance as of December 31, 2020	130,565	7,866	3,040	141,471

(1) Includes 20,000 Class I shares sold to the Advisor in November 2014. See “Note 10” for additional information.

104

Distributions. The following table summarizes the Company’s distribution activity (including distributions reinvested in shares of the Company’s common stock) for each of the quarters ended below:

	Amount
	Declared per		Paid in		Reinvested		Distribution		Gross
(in thousands, except per share data)	Common Share (1)		Cash		in Shares		Fees (2)		Distributions (3)
2020
December 31	$	0.13625	$	6,159	$	9,315	$	3,230	$	18,704
September 30		0.13625		5,601		8,451		2,952		17,004
June 30		0.13625		5,194		7,812		2,710		15,716
March 31		0.13625		3,339		5,077		1,742		10,158
Total	$	0.54500	$	20,293	$	30,655	$	10,634	$	61,582
2019
December 31	$	0.13625	$	2,058	$	3,242	$	1,105	$	6,405
September 30		0.13625		1,841		2,866		992		5,699
June 30		0.13625		1,558		2,319		818		4,695
March 31		0.13625		1,178		1,744		620		3,542
Total	$	0.54500	$	6,635	$	10,171	$	3,535	$	20,341
2018
December 31	$	0.13625	$	747	$	1,102	$	406	$	2,255
September 30		0.13625		495		681		256		1,432
June 30		0.13625		305		399		147		851
March 31		0.13625		140		197		67		404
	$	0.54500	$	1,687	$	2,379	$	876	$	4,942

(1) Amounts reflect the quarterly distribution rate authorized by the Company’s board of directors per Class T share, per Class W share, and per Class I share of common stock. Distributions were declared and paid as of monthly record dates. These monthly distributions have been aggregated and presented on a quarterly basis. The distributions on Class T shares and Class W shares of common stock are reduced by the respective distribution fees that are payable with respect to such Class T shares and Class W shares.

(2) Distribution fees are paid monthly to the Dealer Manager with respect to Class T shares and Class W shares issued in the primary portion of the Company’s public offerings only. Refer to “Note 10” for further detail regarding distribution fees.

(3) Gross distributions are total distributions before the deduction of any distribution fees relating to Class T shares and Class W shares issued in the primary portion of the Company’s public offerings.

Redemptions

Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, a stockholder may redeem shares of the Company’s common stock, regardless of share class, for cash at a price equal to the transaction price in effect as of the last calendar day of that month, except that shares of the Company’s common stock that have not been outstanding for at least one year will be redeemed at 95.0% of the transaction price and Class T shares that have been outstanding for at least one year but less than two years will be redeemed at 97.5% of the transaction price. The “transaction price” generally will be equal to the NAV per share of the Company’s common stock most recently disclosed by the Company. Redemptions are limited by the Company in accordance with a monthly and quarterly cap. While the Company is not obligated to redeem shares of its common stock under its share redemption program, it intends to redeem shares under its share redemption program on a monthly basis. However, the Company’s board of directors may determine from time to time to adjust the timing of redemptions or suspend, terminate or otherwise modify the Company’s share redemption program.

The following table summarizes the Company’s redemption activity for the periods presented below:

	For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share data)	2020		2019		2018
Number of eligible shares redeemed		493		233		63
Aggregate dollar amount of shares redeemed	$	4,867	$	2,285	$	603
Average redemption price per share	$	9.87	$	9.81	$	9.57

105

9. INCOME TAXES

The Company has concluded there were no uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. The U.S. is the major tax jurisdiction for the Company and the earliest tax year subject to examination by the taxing authority is 2017.

Distributions

Distributions to stockholders are characterized for U.S. federal income tax purposes as: (i) ordinary income; (ii) non-taxable return of capital; or (iii) long-term capital gain. Distributions that exceed the Company’s current and accumulated tax earnings and profits constitute a return of capital and reduce the stockholders’ basis in the common shares. To the extent that a distribution exceeds both current and accumulated earnings and profits and the stockholders’ basis in the common shares, the distributions will generally be treated as a gain from the sale or exchange of such stockholders’ common shares. For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2026, all distributions (other than distributions designated as capital gain distributions and distributions traceable to distributions from a taxable REIT subsidiary) which are received by a pass-through entity or an individual, are eligible for a 20% deduction from gross income. At the beginning of each year, the Company notifies its stockholders of the taxability of the distributions paid during the preceding year. The unaudited preliminary taxability of the Company’s 2020, 2019 and 2018 distributions were:

	For the Year Ended December 31,
(unaudited)	2020		2019		2018
Ordinary income	7.1	%	—	%	—	%
Non-taxable return of capital	92.9		100.0		100.0
Long-term capital gain	—		—		—
Total distribution	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%

10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company relies on the Advisor, a related party, to manage the Company’s day-to-day operating and acquisition activities and to implement the Company’s investment strategy pursuant to the terms of the amended and restated advisory agreement (2021), dated February 16, 2021, by and among the Company, the Operating Partnership and the Advisor. The current term of the Advisory Agreement ends June 12, 2021, subject to renewals by the Company’s board of directors for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods. The Dealer Manager provides dealer manager services in connection with the follow-on public offering pursuant to the terms of the dealer manager agreement, effective as of September 5, 2019 (the “Dealer Manager Agreement”), by and among the Company, the Advisor and the Dealer Manager. Black Creek Property Management Company LLC (the “Property Manager”) may perform certain property management services on behalf of the Company and the Operating Partnership. The Sponsor, which owns the Advisor, is presently directly or indirectly majority owned by the estate of John A. Blumberg, James R. Mulvihill and Evan H. Zucker and/or their affiliates and the Sponsor and the Advisor are jointly controlled by the estate of Mr. Blumberg, Messrs Mulvihill and Zucker and/or their respective affiliates. The Dealer Manager and the Property Manager are presently each directly or indirectly majority owned, controlled and/or managed by the estate of Mr. Blumberg, Messrs Mulvihill and/or Zucker and/or their respective affiliates. Mr. Zucker is the Chairman of our board of directors. The Advisor, the Sponsor, the Dealer Manager and the Property Manager receive compensation in the form of fees and expense reimbursements for services relating to the public offerings and for the investment and management of the Company’s assets. The following is a description of the fees and expense reimbursements payable to the Advisor, the Sponsor, the Property Manager and the Dealer Manager. This summary does not purport to be a complete summary of the Advisory Agreement, the Dealer Manager Agreement, the amended and restated management agreement between the Company and the Property Manager, and the sixth amended and restated limited partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership.

Selling Commissions, Dealer Manager Fees and Distribution Fees. The Dealer Manager is entitled to receive upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees with respect to Class T shares sold in the primary offering. The upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees are calculated as a percentage of the offering price at the time of purchase of such shares. All or a portion of the upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees will be retained by, or reallowed to, participating broker dealers. In addition, the Dealer Manager is entitled to receive ongoing distribution fees based on the NAV of Class T shares and Class W shares sold in the primary portion of the offerings. The distribution fees will be payable monthly in arrears and will be paid on a continuous basis from year to year. The Dealer Manager will reallow the distribution fees to participating broker dealers and broker dealers servicing accounts of investors

106

who own Class T shares and/or Class W shares. The following table details the selling commissions, dealer manager fees and distribution fees applicable for each share class. With respect to Class T shares, the distribution fees were payable at a rate of 1.0% of NAV per annum for periods prior to March 1, 2021.

	Class T		Class W		Class I
Selling commissions (as % of offering price)	up to 2.0	%	—	%	—	%
Dealer manager fees (as % of offering price)	up to 2.5	%	—	%	—	%
Distribution fees (as % of NAV per annum)	0.85	%	0.5	%	—	%

The Company will cease paying the distribution fees with respect to individual Class T shares and Class W shares when they are no longer outstanding, including as a result of a conversion to Class I shares. Each Class T share or Class W share held within a stockholder’s account shall automatically and without any action on the part of the holder thereof convert into a number of Class I shares at the applicable conversion rate on the earliest of: (i) a listing of any shares of the Company’s common stock on a national securities exchange; (ii) the Company’s merger or consolidation with or into another entity, or the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets; and (iii) the end of the month in which the Dealer Manager, in conjunction with the Company’s transfer agent, determines that the total upfront selling commissions, upfront dealer manager fees and ongoing distribution fees paid with respect to all shares of such class held by such stockholder within such account (including shares purchased through the distribution reinvestment plan or received as stock dividends) equals or exceeds 8.5% of the aggregate purchase price of all shares of such class held by such stockholder within such account and purchased in the primary portion of the offerings.

Advisory Fee. The advisory fee consists of a fixed component and a performance component. The fixed component of the advisory fee includes a fee that will be paid monthly to the Advisor for asset management services provided to the Company and a fee payable to the Advisor in connection with a disposition. The following table details the fixed component of the advisory fee. Please see “Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for information regarding changes to the advisory fee effected subsequent to December 31, 2020.

	Fixed Component
% of aggregate cost of real property assets located in the U.S. (per annum)	0.80	%
% of aggregate cost of real property assets located outside the U.S. (per annum)	1.20	%
% of aggregate cost or investment of any interest in any other real estate-related entity or debt investment or other investment (per annum)	0.80	%
% of total consideration paid in connection with the disposition of real property or a liquidity event involving gross market capitalization of the Company upon occurrence of a listing	1.00	%

The performance component of the advisory fee, which generally will be paid to the Sponsor in its capacity as holder of a separate series of partnership interests in the Operating Partnership with special distribution rights (the “Special Units”), is a performance based amount in the form of an allocation and distribution. This amount will be paid to the Sponsor, so long as the Advisory Agreement has not been terminated, as a performance participation interest with respect to the Special Units or, at the election of the Sponsor, all or a portion of this amount will be paid instead to the Advisor in the form of an allocation and distribution, as described in the Advisory Agreement.

The performance component of the advisory fee is calculated as the lesser of: (1) 12.5% of (a) the annual total return amount less (b) any loss carryforward; and (2) the amount equal to (x) the annual total return amount, less (y) any loss carryforward, less (z) the amount needed to achieve an annual total return amount equal to 5.0% of the NAV per Fund Interest at the beginning of such year (the “Hurdle Amount”). The foregoing calculations are calculated on a per Fund Interest basis and multiplied by the weighted average Fund Interests outstanding during the year. In no event will the performance component of the advisory fee be less than zero. “Fund Interests” means the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock and any OP Units held by third parties. Accordingly, if the annual total return amount exceeds the Hurdle Amount plus the amount of any loss carryforward, then the Sponsor or the Advisor, as applicable, will earn a performance component equal to 100.0% of such excess, but limited to 12.5% of the annual total return amount that is in excess of the loss carryforward.

The “annual total return amount” referred to above means all distributions paid or accrued per Fund Interest plus any change in NAV per Fund Interest since the end of the prior calendar year, adjusted to exclude the negative impact on annual total return resulting from the Company’s payment or obligation to pay, or distribute, as applicable, the performance component of the advisory fee as well as ongoing distribution fees (i.e., the Company’s ongoing class-specific fees). If the performance component is being calculated with respect to a year in which the Company completes a liquidity event, for purposes of determining the annual total return amount, the change in NAV per

107

Fund Interest will be deemed to equal the difference between the NAV per Fund Interest as of the end of the prior calendar year and the value per Fund Interest determined in connection with such liquidity event, as described in the Advisory Agreement. The “loss carryforward” referred to above tracks any negative annual total return amounts from prior years and offsets the positive annual total return amount for purposes of the calculation of the performance component of the advisory fee. The loss carryforward was zero as of December 31, 2020.

Organization and Offering Expenses. The Advisor agreed to advance all of the Company’s organization and offering expenses on the Company’s behalf, excluding upfront selling commissions, dealer manager fees and distribution fees, through December 31, 2019. The Company agreed to reimburse the Advisor for all such advanced expenses ratably over the 60 months following December 31, 2019 and reimbursed in full in January 2021, as described below. Beginning January 1, 2020, the Company either pays organization and offering expenses directly or reimburses the Advisor for any organization and offering expenses that it pays on the Company’s behalf as and when paid. The Company’s total cumulative organization and offering expenses may not exceed 15.0% of the gross proceeds from the primary portion of the offerings. As such, the Company would not consider organization and offering expenses above that amount to be payable, but such amounts may become payable in the future. As of December 31, 2020, the Company’s cumulative organization and offering expenses had not exceeded 15.0% of the gross proceeds from the primary portion of the offerings and the Company paid the remaining organization and offering expense amounts owed to the Advisor in full in January 2021.

Development Fees. Pursuant to Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment No. 1”), entered into on July 15, 2020, to the Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement (2020), dated as of June 12, 2020, the Company has agreed to pay the Advisor a development fee in connection with providing services related to the development, construction, improvement or stabilization, including tenant improvements, of development properties or overseeing the provision of these services by third parties on behalf of the Company. The fee will be an amount that will be equal to 4.0% of total project cost of the development property (or the Company’s proportional interest therein with respect to real property held in joint ventures or other entities that are co-owned). If the Advisor engages a third party to provide development services, the third party will be compensated directly by the Company, and the Advisor will receive the development fee if it provides development oversight services.

Fees from Other Services. The Company retains certain of the Advisor’s affiliates, from time to time, for services relating to the Company’s investments or its operations, which may include property management services, leasing services, corporate services, statutory services, transaction support services, construction and development management, and loan management and servicing, and within one or more such categories, providing services in respect of asset and/or investment administration, accounting, technology, tax preparation, finance, treasury, operational coordination, risk management, insurance placement, human resources, legal and compliance, valuation and reporting-related services, as well as services related to mortgage servicing, group purchasing, healthcare, consulting/brokerage, capital markets/credit origination, property, title and/or other types of insurance, management consulting and other similar operational matters. Any fees paid to the Advisor’s affiliates for any such services will not reduce the advisory fees. Any such arrangements will be at market rates or reimbursement of costs.

Acquisition Expense Reimbursements. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, subject to certain limitations, the Company agreed to reimburse the Advisor for all acquisition expenses incurred on the Company’s behalf in connection with the selection, acquisition, development or origination of its investments, whether or not such investments are acquired. As these expense reimbursements were not directly attributable to a specified property, they were expensed as incurred on the consolidated statements of operations. Until December 31, 2019, the Advisor deferred reimbursement of all or a portion of acquisition expenses incurred or paid on the Company’s behalf if, in a given month, the reimbursement of acquisition expenses to the Advisor would have caused the NAV per share to be lower than the lesser of $10.00 or the NAV per share calculated for the prior month, which the Company refers to as a shortfall. If the reimbursement would have resulted in a shortfall, then the Advisor deferred reimbursement of acquisition expenses in the amount necessary to prevent a shortfall for such month. The Advisor was reimbursed for any such unreimbursed acquisition expenses as of December 31, 2020. Beginning January 1, 2020, the Company either pays acquisition expenses directly or reimburses the Advisor for any acquisition expenses that it pays on the Company’s behalf as and when paid.

108

The table below summarizes the fees and expenses incurred by the Company for services provided by the Advisor and its affiliates, and by the Dealer Manager related to the services described above, and any related amounts payable:

	For the Year Ended December 31,						Payable as of
(in thousands)	2020		2019		2018		December 31, 2020		December 31, 2019
Expensed:
Organization costs (1)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	78
Advisory fee—fixed component		9,653		4,585		901		1,345		593
Advisory fee—performance component		9,640		2,913		723		9,640		2,913
Acquisition expense reimbursements (2)		2,958		3,068		4,900		1,037		182
Other expense reimbursements (3)		3,003		1,963		1,195		539		473
Total	$	25,254	$	12,529	$	7,719	$	12,561	$	4,239
Capitalized:
Development fees (4)	$	24	$	—	$	—	$	24	$	—
Total	$	24	$	—	$	—	$	24	$	—
Additional Paid-In Capital:
Selling commissions	$	22,433	$	6,391	$	4,372	$	—	$	—
Dealer manager fees		16,757		5,306		4,430		—		—
Offering costs (1)		7,404		7,150		13,270		18,246		21,269
Distribution fees—current		10,634		3,535		875		1,122		389
Distribution fees—trailing (5)		28,493		9,010		7,063		44,962		16,467
Total	$	85,721	$	31,392	$	30,010	$	64,330	$	38,125

(1) As of December 31, 2020, the Advisor had incurred $22.0 million in offering costs and $0.1 million of organization costs on behalf of the Company. The Company is reimbursing the Advisor for all organization and offering costs incurred on its behalf as of December 31, 2019 ratably over 60 months. Since January 1, 2020, the Company either pays directly or reimburses the Advisor for offering costs as and when incurred. The Company agreed to pay the remaining organization and offering expense amounts owed to the Advisor in full in January 2021.

(2) Reflects amounts reimbursable to the Advisor for all expenses incurred by the Advisor and its affiliates on the Company’s behalf in connection with the selection, acquisition, development or origination of an asset. The Company either pays directly or reimburses the Advisor for such expenses.

(3) Other expense reimbursements include certain expenses incurred in connection with the services provided to the Company under the Advisory Agreement. These reimbursements include a portion of compensation expenses of individual employees of the Advisor, including certain of the Company’s named executive officers, related to services for which the Advisor does not otherwise receive a separate fee. A portion of the compensation received by certain employees of the Advisor and its affiliates may be in the form of a restricted stock grant awarded by the Company. The Company shows these as reimbursements to the Advisor to the same extent that the Company recognizes the related share-based compensation on its consolidated statements of operations. The Company reimbursed the Advisor approximately $2.7 million, $1.8 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, for such compensation expenses. The remaining amount of other expense reimbursements relate to other general overhead and administrative expenses including, but not limited to, allocated rent paid to both third parties and affiliates of the Advisor, equipment, utilities, insurance, travel and entertainment.

(4) Development fees are included in the total development project costs of the respective properties and are capitalized in construction in progress, which is included in net investment in real estate properties on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

(5) The distribution fees are payable monthly in arrears. The monthly amount of distribution fees payable is included in distributions payable on the consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, the Company accrues for estimated trailing amounts payable based on the shares outstanding as of the balance sheet date, which are included in distribution fees payable to affiliates on the consolidated balance sheets. All or a portion of the distribution fees are reallowed or advanced by the Dealer Manager to unaffiliated participating broker dealers and broker dealers servicing accounts of investors who own Class T shares and/or Class W shares.

109

In addition, the Company paid the Advisor for property-level accounting services in the amount of approximately $603,000, $313,000, and $36,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These payments were funded from a portion of the property management fees paid by customers at our properties, with the remainder of such property management fees paid to the third-party property managers for such properties. The portion of these payments by the customers that were passed through to the Advisor were related to property accounting services and are at or near market rates for the regions in which our properties are located.

Transactions with Affiliates

In November 2014, the Company sold 20,000 shares of Class A common stock to the Advisor at a price of $10.00 per share. Additionally, the Operating Partnership issued 20,000 OP Units to the Company in exchange for $200,000. The Operating Partnership also issued 100 Special Units to the Sponsor for consideration of $1,000. The Special Units are classified as noncontrolling interests.

Performance Fee OP Units

The 2020 performance component of the advisory fee in the amount of $9.6 million became payable to the Sponsor on December 31, 2020, which were issued as Class I OP units in January 2021. Such Class I OP Units were issued at the NAV per unit as of December 31, 2020. The 2019 performance component of the advisory fee in the amount of $2.9 million became payable to the Sponsor on December 31, 2019, which were issued as Class I OP units in January 2020.

Joint Venture Partnerships

Interests Purchase

On July 15, 2020, the Company acquired interests in two portfolios comprised of 64 acquired or completed buildings and 18 buildings under construction or in the pre-construction phase. As a result of the acquisition, the Company owned a 19.9% limited partner interest in the BTC I Partnership, a 0.1% general partner interest in the BTC I Partnership, a 7.9% limited partner interest in the BTC II Partnership, and a 0.1% general partner interest in the BTC II Partnership (collectively, the “Interests”). The purchase price for the Interests was $301.0 million in cash paid at closing, exclusive of due diligence expenses and other closing costs. The Company funded the acquisition of the Interests using proceeds from its public offering.

The Company acquired the Interests from Industrial Property Operating Partnership LP (“IPT OP”), a subsidiary of IPT, which was a Maryland statutory trust that was advised by Industrial Property Advisors LLC (the “IPT Advisor”), an affiliate of the Company’s Advisor. IPT terminated its existence on July 28, 2020, following the sale of its interests in the BTC Partnerships. The Company and IPT also had certain common officers. Certain former officers of IPT and certain former trustees of the IPT board of trustees (the “IPT Board”) are also stockholders of the Company. Prior to the termination of IPT, the Company and IPT were also sponsored by affiliates of Black Creek Group, LLC, and such sponsors held partnership units in the operating partnerships of the Company and IPT, respectively, and certain former trustees of IPT were also members of the Company’s board of directors. The IPT Board and the Company’s board of directors each established a special committee of independent trustees or directors, as applicable, to review and approve the agreements between the Company and IPT OP and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the sale of the Interests. The members of the IPT special committee did not overlap with members of the Company’s special committee, and none of the members of the Company’s special committee were trustees of IPT. All of the members of the Company’s special committee were disinterested in the transactions, including the sale of the Interests. Each of the special committees engaged legal counsel and an independent financial advisor to assist the special committees in their evaluation and negotiation of the transactions. CBRE Capital Advisors, Inc., the independent financial advisor to the IPT special committee, delivered a fairness opinion to the IPT special committee. Duff & Phelps, the independent financial advisor to the Company special committee, delivered a fairness opinion to the Company special committee. The agreements between the Company and IPT OP and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the sale of the Interests, were approved by the special committees of each of the Company and IPT.

BTC I Partnership Promote

The BTC I Partnership’s Partnership Agreement contains procedures for making incentive distributions to its partners, which are subject to the achievement of certain return thresholds. The incentive distributions became due and payable in the fourth quarter of 2020. The Company elected to receive its share of the incentive distribution as an increase of its interest in the Partnership in lieu of a cash payment. As a result, the Company’s limited partner interest in the BTC I Partnership decreased from 19.9% to 17.9% and its general partner interest

110

in the BTC I Partnership increased from 0.1% to 8.9%. As stipulated in the Partnership Agreement, partners are required to make contributions into the Partnership in order to fund the incentive distribution, and the Company made net payments of $18.2 million to the Partnership to fulfill its share of this requirement. As of December 31, 2020, the BTC I Partnership owed the Company $3.2 million for the Company’s overpayment of the required contributions, which was recorded in due from affiliates on the consolidated balance sheets.

BTC I Services Agreement and Incentive Distributions Sharing

Pursuant to the Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the BTC I Partnership, as amended (the “BTC I Partnership Agreement”), the Company, as the general partner of the BTC I Partnership (the “BTC I GP”) will provide, directly or indirectly by appointing an affiliate or a third party, acquisition and asset management services and, to the extent applicable, development management and development oversight services (the “BTC I Advisory Services”). As compensation for providing the BTC I Advisory Services, the BTC I Partnership will pay the BTC I GP, or its designee, certain fees in accordance with the terms of the BTC I Partnership Agreement. On February 12, 2015, the BTC I GP and IPT Advisor and an entity owned by affiliates of the Advisor, entered into an agreement that the IPT Advisor subsequently assigned to Industrial Property Advisors Sub I LLC (the “BTC I SLP”), an entity owned by affiliates of the Advisor. Pursuant to this agreement (the “BTC I Services Agreement”), the BTC I GP appointed the BTC I SLP to provide the BTC I Advisory Services and assigned to the BTC I SLP the fees payable pursuant to the BTC I Partnership Agreement for providing the BTC I Advisory Services. As a result of the payment of the fees pursuant to the BTC I Services Agreement, the fees payable to the Advisor pursuant to the Advisory Agreement will be reduced by the product of (i) the fees actually paid to the BTC I SLP pursuant to the BTC I Services Agreement, and (ii) the percentage interest of the BTC I Partnership owned by the Company through its general partner and limited partner interests.

In connection with the sale of the Interests, the parties to the BTC I Services Agreement amended such agreement to make certain conforming changes to reflect the new indirect ownership structure of the BTC I Partnership as a result of the sale of the Interests.

In addition, the BTC I Partnership Agreement contains procedures for making distributions to the parties, including incentive distributions to the BTC I GP and the BTC I SLP, which are subject to certain return thresholds being achieved. The BTC I GP and the BTC I SLP have agreed to split such incentive distributions such that the BTC I SLP will receive 60% of the incentive distributions attributable to interests in the BTC I Partnership which are not owned by the BTC I GP or the BTC I LP.

Pursuant to the BTC I Partnership Agreement, the partners will be obligated to make capital contributions in proportion to their respective partnership interests with respect to each approved investment as well as with respect to any additional capital calls the BTC I GP makes from time to time, including with respect to the funding of incentive distributions, certain preservation costs, certain limited operating and capital variances and other items.

Pursuant to an agreement between the BTC I SLP and the subsidiaries through which the Company owns its general partner and limited partner interests in the BTC I Partnership, dated September 15, 2016, if the Company proposes to transfer all (but not less than all) of its respective interests in the BTC I Partnership to an unrelated third party, then the Company can require the BTC I SLP to transfer its special limited partnership interest to the purchaser on the same terms and conditions.

In connection with the promote transaction described above, the BTC I SLP assigned its interest in the BTC I Services Agreement to Industrial Property Advisors Sub II LLC (the “BTC I Service Provider”), including, without limitation, the BTC I SLP’s obligations to provide services and right to receive fees under the agreement, with such assignment effective as of the Effective Date.

BTC II Services Agreement and Incentive Distributions Sharing

Pursuant to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of the BTC II Partnership, as amended (the “BTC II Partnership Agreement”), the Company, as the general partner of the BTC II Partnership (the “BTC II GP”) will provide, directly or indirectly by appointing an affiliate or a third party, acquisition and asset management services and, to the extent applicable, development management and development oversight services (the “BTC II Advisory Services”). As compensation for providing the BTC II Advisory Services, the BTC II Partnership will pay the BTC II GP, or its designee, certain fees in accordance with the terms of the BTC II Partnership Agreement. On May 19, 2017, the BTC II GP and Industrial Property Advisors Sub III LLC (the “BTC II Service Provider”), an entity owned by affiliates of the Advisor, entered into that certain agreement (the “BTC II Services Agreement”), pursuant to which the BTC II GP appointed the BTC II Service Provider to provide the BTC II Advisory Services and assigned to the BTC II Service Provider the fees payable pursuant to the BTC II Partnership Agreement for providing the BTC II Advisory Services. As a result of the payment of the fees pursuant to the BTC II Services

111

Agreement, the fees payable to the Advisor pursuant to the Advisory Agreement will be reduced by the product of (i) the fees actually paid to the BTC II Service Provider pursuant to the BTC II Services Agreement, and (ii) the percentage interest of the BTC II Partnership owned by the Company through its general partner and limited partner interests.

In connection with the sale of the Interests, the parties to the BTC II Services Agreement amended such agreement to make certain conforming changes to reflect the new indirect ownership structure of the BTC II Partnership as a result of the sale of the Interests.

In addition, the BTC II Partnership Agreement contains procedures for making distributions to the parties, including incentive distributions to the BTC II GP and Industrial Property Advisors Sub IV LLC (the “BTC II SLP”), an entity owned by affiliates of the Advisor, which are subject to certain return thresholds being achieved. The BTC II GP and the BTC II SLP have agreed to split such incentive distributions such that the BTC II SLP will receive 80% of the incentive distributions attributable to interests in the BTC II Partnership which are not owned by the Company through its general partner and limited partner interests.

Pursuant to the BTC II Partnership Agreement, the partners will be obligated to make capital contributions in proportion to their respective partnership interests with respect to each approved investment as well as with respect to any additional capital calls the BTC II GP makes from time to time, including with respect to the funding of incentive distributions, certain preservation costs, certain limited operating and capital variances and other items.

Joint Venture Partnership Fees

For the period from July 16, 2020 through December 31, 2020, the BTC Partnerships (as described in “Note 5”) incurred in aggregate approximately $6.2 million in acquisition and asset management fees, which were paid to affiliates of the Advisor pursuant to the respective service agreements. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had amounts due from the BTC Partnerships in aggregate of approximately $25,000 for partnership fees, which were recorded in due from affiliates on the consolidated balance sheets.

Expense Support Agreement

On January 1, 2019, the Company, the Advisor and the Operating Partnership entered into the Second Amended and Restated Expense Support Agreement (the “Expense Support Agreement”). The Expense Support Agreement amended and restated the agreement that had been entered into by the Company, the Operating Partnership and the Advisor in October 2016, which was subsequently amended and restated as of July 1, 2017. Pursuant to the Expense Support Agreement, the Advisor has agreed to defer certain fees and fund certain of the Company’s expenses, subject to the terms of the agreement. As amended, the Expense Support Agreement provides that, effective for each quarter commencing January 1, 2019 and ending December 31, 2020, the Advisor has agreed to defer payment of all or a portion of the fixed component of the advisory fee otherwise payable to it pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, if, for a particular quarter, the sum of (i) funds from operations (“FFO”), before taking into consideration any of the amounts paid to or by the Advisor pursuant to the Expense Support Agreement, as disclosed in the Company’s quarterly and annual reports, (ii) the Company’s accrued acquisition expenses (net of any acquisition expenses paid by the Company or on its behalf), (iii) the performance component of the advisory fee, (iv) any adjustment that has been made in calculating the Company’s FFO based on straight-line rent and amortization of above/below market leases, (v) organization and offering expenses reimbursed by the Company to the Advisor, and (vi) the fair market value gain amount (collectively, the “Expense Support Threshold”) is less than the aggregate gross cash distributions declared for such quarter, assuming all such cash distributions had been declared at the aggregate distribution rate for Class I shares authorized by the Company’s board of directors for such quarter (“Baseline Distributions”). For purposes of calculating the Expense Support Threshold, the “fair market value gain amount” is an amount equal to up to the total net realized and unrealized fair market value gains on the Company’s real property investments, derivative instruments, and debt for a quarter. The Advisor, in its reasonable discretion, shall determine the amount of such gain to be included in the calculation of the Expense Support Threshold each quarter; provided, that, in no event shall the Advisor determine to include an amount of such gain that causes the Company’s NAV per share, as calculated in accordance with its valuation procedures for such quarter, to decrease below the lesser of (i) $10.00 per share and (ii) the Company’s most recently disclosed NAV per share. Further, for purposes of calculating the Expense Support Threshold, the amounts in each of subsections (ii), (iii), (iv), and (v) of the definition will be a positive number if it was a deduction in calculating the Company’s FFO for such quarter, and conversely will be a negative number if it was an addition in calculating its FFO for such quarter. For example, if straight-line rent and amortization of above/below-market leases was an addition in calculating the Company’s FFO, then it would be a negative number in calculating the Expense Support Threshold. The amount of the fixed component of the advisory fee that will be deferred for a particular quarter, if any, will equal the lesser of (i) the difference between the Expense Support Threshold and Baseline Distributions for such quarter and (ii) the entire fixed component of the advisory fee payable to the Advisor pursuant to the Advisory Agreement for such quarter.

112

In addition, if in a given calendar quarter, the Expense Support Threshold is less than Baseline Distributions for such quarter, and the deferred fixed component of the advisory fee is not sufficient to satisfy the shortfall for such quarter (a “Deficiency”) the Advisor will be required to fund certain of the Company’s or the Operating Partnership’s expenses in an amount equal to such Deficiency. In no event will the aggregate of the fixed component of the advisory fee deferred by the Advisor and the Deficiency support payments made by the Advisor between October 2016 and the termination or expiration of the Expense Support Agreement exceed $15.0 million (the “Maximum Amount”). Subject to certain conditions, the Advisor is entitled to reimbursement from the Company for any fixed component of the advisory fee that is deferred and any Deficiency support payments that the Advisor makes pursuant to the Expense Support Agreement; provided, that, other than under certain circumstances in connection with a Liquidity Event (described below), the Company will not be obligated to reimburse the Advisor for any amount not reimbursed by the Company to the Advisor within four years after the quarter in which such reimbursable amount originated. For any quarter in which the Expense Support Threshold exceeds Baseline Distributions for that quarter, the Expense Support Agreement requires that the Company reimburses the Advisor in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the difference between the Expense Support Threshold and Baseline Distributions and (ii) the sum of all outstanding reimbursable amounts.

In connection with the Company’s completion of a Liquidity Event, the Company will reimburse the Advisor for any outstanding reimbursable amounts that have not been repaid, including amounts that have not been reimbursed by the Company within four years after the quarter in which such reimbursable amount originated (the “Outstanding Reimbursable Amounts”); provided that the Company will reimburse the Advisor in these circumstances only if the “Annual Total Return Amount” exceeds the “Total Return Hurdle” (each as described below); and provided further that the amount of the reimbursement shall equal the lesser of (i) the sum of all Outstanding Reimbursable Amounts, or (ii) the maximum amount permitted to be reimbursed without causing the Annual Total Return Amount to be less than the Total Return Hurdle. For purposes of the Expense Support Agreement, “Annual Total Return Amount” means (i) a cumulative, non-compounded pre-tax rate of return equal to (a) the sum of (x) the cumulative gross distributions per share declared by the Company since the date on which it first issued shares to third-party retail investors in its public offering (the “Inception Date”), and (y) the “Ending NAV,” less $10.00 (the deemed NAV on the Inception Date), (b) divided by $10.00, (ii) divided by the number of years, including fractional years, between the Inception Date and the Liquidity Event. “Ending NAV” means the NAV per share determined in connection with a Liquidity Event. In connection with a listing, the Ending NAV will be an amount equal to the per share market value of the listed shares based upon the average closing price or, if the average closing price is not available, the average of the bid and asked prices, for the 30-day period beginning 90 days after such listing. Upon a Liquidity Event other than a listing, the Ending NAV shall be an amount equal to the per share consideration received by stockholders in connection with such Liquidity Event. For purposes of the Expense Support Agreement, “Total Return Hurdle” means a non-compounded, pre-tax annual rate of return equal to 5%. If Outstanding Reimbursable Amounts are payable to the Advisor, the Company will pay them prior to any payment of any other distribution to any other party in connection with a Liquidity Event. Further, in the event that the Company terminates the Advisory Agreement without cause and not in connection with a Liquidity Event, any reimbursable amounts that have not expired or been repaid pursuant to the terms of the Expense Support Agreement will become immediately due and payable to the Advisor. The Company’s obligation to reimburse the Advisor will be non-interest bearing.

During the term of the Expense Support Agreement, the Company may be able to use cash flow from operations to pay distributions to its stockholders that would otherwise be used to pay the fixed component of the advisory fee or expenses. The Expense Support Agreement was not renewed after the expiration of its effective term on December 31, 2020 and the Company does not expect to receive any additional expense support from the Advisor in the future.

113

The table below provides information regarding the fees deferred and expense support provided by the Advisor, pursuant to the Expense Support Agreement. As of December 31, 2020, the aggregate amount paid by the Advisor pursuant to the Expense Support Agreement was $27.1 million. Of this amount, total reimbursements to the Advisor were $27.1 million. As of December 31, 2020, all reimbursable amounts have been paid in their entirety, and no amounts remain to be reimbursed to the Advisor.

	For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2020		2019		2018
Fees deferred	$	3,896	$	3,895	$	901
Other expenses supported		9,609		2,243		4,682
Total expense support from Advisor		13,505		6,138	$	5,583
Reimbursement of previously deferred fees and other expenses supported		(13,505)		(13,606)		—
Total (reimbursement to) expense support from Advisor, net (1)	$	—	$	(7,468)	$	5,583

(1) As of December 31, 2020, no amounts were payable to or receivable from the Advisor. As of December 31, 2019, approximately $5.4 million was payable to the Advisor by the Company and is included in due to affiliates on the consolidated balance sheets.

11. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Supplemental cash flow information and disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities is as follows:

	For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2020		2019		2018
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest	$	12,180	$	7,810	$	1,521
Distributions payable		6,450		2,241		920
Distribution fees payable to affiliates		44,962		16,467		7,457
Distributions reinvested in common stock		28,590		9,482		1,959
Accrued offering and organization costs		18,246		21,347		14,197
Redeemable noncontrolling interest issued as settlement of performance component of the advisory fee		2,913		723		—
Accrued acquisition expense reimbursements		1,037		182		3,500
Non-cash selling commissions and dealer manager fees		39,190		11,697		8,802
Mortgage notes assumed on real estate acquisitions at fair value		—		50,418		—

Restricted Cash

The following table presents the components of the beginning of period and end of period cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the consolidated statements of cash flows:

	For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2020		2019		2018
Beginning of period:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	51,178	$	19,016	$	10,565
Restricted cash (1)		—		5		481
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	51,178	$	19,021	$	11,046
End of period:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	232,369	$	51,178	$	19,016
Restricted cash (1)		530		—		5
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	232,899	$	51,178	$	19,021

(1) As of December 31, 2020, restricted cash consisted of cash held in escrow in connection with certain property improvements required by the lender of the $118.5 million mortgage note entered into in October 2020. As of December 31, 2019, the Company did not have any restricted cash. As of December 31, 2018, restricted cash consisted of cash held in escrow in connection with certain estimated property improvements. As of December 31, 2017, restricted cash consisted of amounts deposited with a third-party escrow agent related to the notes issued pursuant to the private offering, which was released to the Company from escrow in January 2018.

114

12. NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

Special Units

In November 2014, the Operating Partnership issued 100 Special Units to the parent of the Advisor for consideration of $1,000. The holder of the Special Units does not participate in the profits and losses of the Operating Partnership. The Sponsor in its capacity as holder of the Special Units will be paid a performance based amount in the form of an allocation and distribution. Refer to “Note 10” for details regarding the performance component of the advisory fee and Class I OP Units issued as payment for the performance component of the advisory fee. This amount will be paid to the Sponsor, so long as the Advisory Agreement has not been terminated, as a performance participation interest with respect to the Special Units or, at the election of the Sponsor, will be paid instead to the Advisor in the form of an allocation and distribution, as described in the Advisory Agreement. The limited partner interests not owned by the Company are presented as noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements. The noncontrolling interests are reported on the consolidated balance sheets within permanent equity, separate from stockholders’ equity.

Subsidiary REITs

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company acquired controlling interests in one subsidiary REIT that owns one building for a total purchase price of $22.4 million. The Company indirectly owns and controls the managing member of the subsidiary REIT. Noncontrolling interests represent the portion of equity in the subsidiary REIT that the Company does not own. Such noncontrolling interests are equity instruments presented in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020 as noncontrolling interests within permanent equity. The noncontrolling interests consist of redeemable preferred shares with a 12.5% annual preferred dividend. The subsidiary REIT has 125 preferred shares issued and outstanding at a par value of $1,000 per share, for an aggregate amount of $125,000. The preferred shares are non-voting and have no rights to income or loss. The preferred shares are redeemable by the respective subsidiary REIT at the discretion of the Company, through its ownership and control of the managing member, for $1,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. As of December 31, 2020, the subsidiary REIT had preferred dividends payable in the amount of approximately $7,800, which were recorded in distributions payable on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

13. SIGNIFICANT RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

Significant Risks and Uncertainties

Currently, one of the most significant risks and uncertainties is the adverse effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. The extent of the impact from COVID-19 on the commercial real estate sector continues to vary dramatically across real estate property types and markets, with certain property segments such as hospitality, gaming, shopping malls, senior housing, and student living being impacted particularly hard. While not immune to the effects of COVID-19, the industrial property sector in which the Company invests continues to remain relatively resilient; however, the Company has had customers request rent deferral or rent abatement during this pandemic. The outbreak has triggered a period of global economic slowdown and could trigger a global recession.

The COVID-19 pandemic could have material and adverse effects on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in the near term due to, but not limited to, the following:

● reduced economic activity severely impacts the Company’s customers’ businesses, financial condition and liquidity and may cause customers to be unable to fully meet their obligations to the Company or to otherwise seek modifications of such obligations, resulting in increases in uncollectible receivables and reductions in rental income;

● the negative financial impact of the pandemic could impact the Company’s future compliance with financial covenants of the Company’s credit facility and other debt agreements; and

● weaker economic conditions could cause the Company to recognize impairment in value of its tangible or intangible assets.

The Company is closely monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on all aspects of its business, including how it will impact its customers and business partners. While the Company did not incur significant disruptions during the year ended December 31, 2020 from the COVID-19 pandemic, it is unable to predict the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have on its future financial condition, results of operations and cash flows due to numerous uncertainties and the impact could be material. The extent to which the COVID-19

115

pandemic impacts the Company’s operations and those of the Company’s customers will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the scope, severity and duration of the pandemic, the actions taken to contain the pandemic or mitigate its impact, and the direct and indirect economic effects of the pandemic and containment measures, among others.

14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company and the Operating Partnership are not presently involved in any material litigation nor, to the Company’s knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries.

Environmental Matters

A majority of the properties the Company acquires have been or will be subject to environmental reviews either by the Company or the previous owners. In addition, the Company may incur environmental remediation costs associated with certain land parcels it may acquire in connection with the development of land. The Company has or may acquire certain properties in urban and industrial areas that may have been leased to or previously owned by commercial and industrial companies that discharged hazardous material. The Company may purchase various environmental insurance policies to mitigate its exposure to environmental liabilities. The Company is not aware of any environmental liabilities that it believes would have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, or results of operations as of December 31, 2020.

15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Status of the Public Offerings

As of March 1, 2021, the Company had raised gross proceeds of $1.6 billion from the sale of 152.8 million shares of its common stock in its public offerings, including $50.0 million from the sale of 5.0 million shares of its common stock through its distribution reinvestment plan. As of March 1, 2021, approximately $866.9 million in shares of the Company’s common stock remained available for sale pursuant to its follow-on public offering in any combination of Class T shares, Class W shares and Class I shares, including approximately $458.3 million in shares of common stock available for sale through its distribution reinvestment plan, which may be reallocated for sale in the Company’s primary offering.

Completed Acquisitions

On January 8, 2021, the Company acquired one industrial building located in the D.C. / Baltimore market. The total purchase price was approximately $19.0 million, exclusive of transfer taxes, due diligence expenses, acquisition costs and other closing costs.

Acquisitions Under Contract

The Company has entered into contracts to acquire properties with an aggregate contract purchase price of approximately $83.6 million comprised of two industrial buildings and one land parcel. There can be no assurance that the Company will complete the acquisition of the properties under contract.

DST Program

The Company, through the Operating Partnership, intends to initiate a program to raise capital in private placements exempt from registration under Section 506(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the “Securities Act” through the sale of beneficial interests in specific Delaware statutory trusts holding real properties, including properties currently indirectly owned by the Operating Partnership.

Under the DST Program, each private placement will offer interests in one or more real properties placed into one or more Delaware statutory trust(s) by the Operating Partnership or its affiliates (the “DST Properties”). The Company anticipates that these interests may serve as replacement properties for investors seeking to complete like kind exchange transactions under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”). Additionally, underlying interests of properties that are sold to investors pursuant to such private placements will be leased back by an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership on a long term basis of up to 29 years.

116

The lease agreements are expected to be fully guaranteed by the Operating Partnership. Additionally, the Operating Partnership will retain a fair market value purchase option giving it the right, but not the obligation, to acquire the beneficial interests in the Delaware statutory trusts from the investors at a later time in exchange for OP Units.

The Company expects that the DST Program will give it the opportunity to expand and diversify its capital raising and asset acquisition strategies by offering what it believes to be an attractive and unique investment product for investors that may be seeking replacement properties to complete like kind exchange transactions under Section 1031 of the Code. The Company expects to use the net proceeds of these private placements to make investments in accordance with its investment strategy and policies, to provide liquidity to its investors and for general corporate purposes (which may include repayment of the Company’s debt or any other corporate purposes it deems appropriate). The specific amounts of the net proceeds that are used for such purposes, and the priority of such uses, will depend on the amount and timing of receipts of such proceeds and what the Company deems to be the best use of such proceeds at such time.

In connection with the DST Program, Black Creek Industrial Exchange LLC (“BCIX”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary that is wholly-owned by the Operating Partnership, will enter into a dealer manager agreement with the Company’s Dealer Manager. Pursuant to the dealer manager agreement, the Dealer Manager agreed to conduct the private placements of up to $500 million of interests. BC Exchange Industrial Manager LLC (the “DST Manager”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company’s Operating Partnership, will act, directly or through a wholly owned subsidiary, as the manager of each Delaware statutory trust holding a DST Property, but has assigned all of its rights and obligations as manager (including fees and reimbursements received) to BC Exchange Industrial Advisor LLC (the “DST Advisor”), an affiliate of the Advisor.

Further, in connection with the DST Program, the Company’s affiliate, BCIX will maintain a loan program and may, upon request, provide loans (the “DST Investor Loans” and, each individually, a “DST Investor Loan”) to certain purchasers of the interests in the Delaware Statutory Trusts (the “DST Interests”) to finance a portion of the purchase price payable upon their acquisition of such interests (the “Purchase Price”). The DST Investor Loans will be made by a newly formed entity (the “BCIX Lender”), which will be affiliated with the Company, the Operating Partnership and the DST Manager.

BTC I Partnership Agreement

Incentive Distributions Pursuant to BTC I Partnership Agreement

As disclosed in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on July 21, 2020 (the “Prior 8-K”), the Company, indirectly through certain of its subsidiaries, owns a minority ownership interest in the BTC I Partnership. Specifically, our subsidiaries, IPT BTC I GP LLC (the “BTC I GP”) and IPT BTC I LP LLC (the “BTC I LP”), own a general partner interest and a minority limited partner interest, respectively, in the BTC I Partnership.

The Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the BTC I Partnership, dated as of December 31, 2016, and amended as of July 15, 2020, by and among the BTC I GP, the BTC I LP, Industrial Property Advisors Sub I LLC (the “BTC I SLP”), an affiliate of our Advisor, and QR Master Holdings USA II LP (the “BTC I Partnership Agreement”), contains procedures for making distributions to the parties, including incentive distributions to the BTC I GP and the BTC I SLP, which are subject to the achievement of certain return thresholds. The BTC I GP and the BTC I SLP agreed to split such incentive distributions such that BTC I SLP will receive 60% of the incentive distributions attributable to interests in BTC I which are not owned by the BTC I GP or the BTC I LP. The incentive distributions became due and payable in the fourth quarter of 2020. Our subsidiary, the BTC I GP, elected to receive its share of the incentive distribution as an increase of our interest in BTC I in lieu of a cash payment. The new percentage ownership interest of the BTC I GP in BTC I is described below under “—Amendment to the BTC I Partnership Agreement”. The BTC I SLP requested that a portion of its incentive distribution be issued as an increase of its interest in BTC I in lieu of a full redemption of its interest and a cash payment, and the parties to the BTC I Partnership Agreement amended the BTC I Partnership Agreement to accommodate this request, as described below.

Amendment to BTC I Partnership Agreement

The parties to the BTC I Partnership Agreement entered into a second amendment to the agreement on January 12, 2021 (the “Amendment”). Pursuant to the Amendment, effective as of December 22, 2020 (the “Effective Date”), a portion of the BTC I SLP’s incentive distribution in the amount of $16 million was issued as an increase of the BTC I SLP’s interest in the BTC I Partnership. As of the Effective Date, the BTC I GP owned an 8.9% interest, the BTC I LP owned a 17.9% interest, the BTC I SLP owned a 1.2% interest and the third party partner, QR Master Holdings USA II LP (the “QR Limited Partner”), owned a 72.0% interest in BTC I. The QR Limited Partner was previously assigned 100% of the interest held by the BCIMC Limited Partner, as defined in the Prior 8-K.

117

The Amendment also provides that the BTC I SLP will participate pro rata (based on its percentage interest) in any distributions of available cash and liquidating distributions. In addition, the BTC I SLP will be treated in the same manner as the BTC I LP for purposes of the rights of first offer, tag along rights, buy-sell and forced sale provisions of the BTC I Partnership Agreement, which were described in the Prior 8-K.

Pursuant to the Amendment, the QR Limited Partner and the BTC I SLP each have the right, on 15 days’ prior written notice, to cause BTC I to redeem the BTC I SLP’s interest. Until March 31, 2021, the redemption price will be $16 million. Thereafter, the redemption price will be the fair market value of the interest, determined based on the latest appraised value of BTC I’s assetsplus any capital contributions funded with respect to such assets since the appraised value was finalized, in each case adjusted to reflect any applicable distributions in connection with any capital transactions.

As also disclosed in the Prior 8-K, the Company entered in to an agreement (the “BTC I Services Agreement”) between the BTC I GP, the BTC I SLP, and the Advisor, pursuant to which the BTC I GP appointed the BTC I SLP to provide acquisition and asset management services and, to the extent applicable, development management and development oversight services (the “BTC I Advisory Services”) and assigned to the BTC I SLP the fees payable pursuant to the BTC I Partnership Agreement for providing the BTC I Advisory Services. In connection with the transactions described above, the BTC I SLP assigned its interest in the BTC I Services Agreement to the BTC I Service Provider, including, without limitation, the BTC I SLP’s obligations to provide services and right to receive fees under the agreement, with such assignment effective as of the Effective Date. The BTC I Service Provider is owned by an affiliate of the Advisor.

Dealer Manager Agreement

On February 16, 2021, we entered into the Amended and Restated Dealer Manager Agreement (the “A&R Dealer Manager Agreement”) with the Advisor and the Dealer Manager. The A&R Dealer Manager Agreement amends and restates the dealer manager agreement, dated as of September 5, 2019, by and among us, the Advisor and the Dealer Manager, to reduce the rate at which the distribution fee payable on Class T shares will be paid from 1.0% of NAV per annum to 0.85% of NAV per annum. The terms of the A&R Dealer Manager Agreement are otherwise substantially the same as the terms of the prior dealer manager agreement.

Share Redemption Program

Our share redemption program provides that we may redeem, during any calendar month, shares whose aggregate value (based on the price at which the shares are redeemed) is 2% of our aggregate NAV as of the last calendar day of the previous quarter and, during any calendar quarter, shares whose aggregate value (based on the price at which the shares are redeemed) is up to 5% of the Company’s aggregate NAV as of the last calendar day of the prior calendar quarter. On February 16, 2021, our board of directors approved the amended and restated share redemption program (the “Share Redemption Program”). The Share Redemption Program amends and restates the prior share redemption program in a manner which enhances the potential capacity for redemptions. Specifically, the Share Redemption Program provides that (i) if share redemptions are less than 2% in the first months of a given quarter, any unused capacity will carry over to the second month, and any unused capacity for the first two months will carry over to the third month; provided that redemptions in any given quarter will not exceed 5% of our aggregate NAV as of the last day of the prior quarter; and (ii) the redemption limitations will be based on net redemptions during a month or quarter, as applicable. The term “net redemptions” means, during the applicable period, the excess of share redemptions (capital outflows) over the proceeds from the sale of shares (capital inflows). Our board of directors may determine to change the measurement from net to gross redemptions with respect to a particular quarter in its discretion, but any such determination must be made with respect to the entire quarter. The Share Redemption Program has also been amended to eliminate the 2.5% early redemption deduction applicable to Class T Shares outstanding for at least one year but less than two years, such that the only early redemption deduction in place is a 5% early redemption deduction that will ordinarily apply to all shares that have been outstanding for less than one year. However, on February 16, 2021, our board of directors suspended the early redemption deduction on all redemptions effected from February 16, 2021 through at least September 30, 2021.

In addition, the Share Redemption Program includes new provisions regarding certain circumstances in which the early redemption deduction may be waived, as well as certain limitations that will be imposed on the Company’s ability to make new investments, increase the then-current distribution rate and pay the performance component of the advisory fee under the Advisory Agreement and the Partnership Agreement (defined below), in the event that the Company were ever to fail to satisfy 100% of properly submitted redemption requests for any consecutive 24-month period.

Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement

On February 16, 2021, the Company and the Operating Partnership entered into the Advisory Agreement with the Advisor. The Advisory Agreement amends and restates the Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement (2020) to, among other things, amend the calculation of

118

the fixed component of the advisory fee. As amended, the fixed component of the advisory fee, which was previously a monthly fee in an amount equal to 1/12th of 0.80% of the aggregate cost of each real property asset within our portfolio, will be a monthly fee in an amount equal to 1/12th of 1.25% of (a) the applicable monthly NAV per Fund Interest times the weighted-average number of Fund Interests for such month and (b) the consideration received by the Company or its affiliates for selling interests in properties under the DST Program (defined below), net of up-front fees and expense reimbursements payable out of gross sale proceeds from the sale of such interests. “Fund Interests” are outstanding shares of our common stock and units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership held by third parties. In addition, the Advisory Agreement revised the circumstances under which the fixed component of the advisory fee will be paid in connection with a disposition, eliminating the payment of the fee in connection with one-off dispositions that do not result in a special distribution to our stockholders. As amended, the Advisory Agreement provides that the fee will be paid in connection with a disposition, which includes (i) a sale of any substantial portion of our assets, whether effectuated either directly or indirectly through the sale of any entity owning such assets, including, without limitation, the Company or the Operating Partnership, (ii) any sale, merger, or other transaction resulting in a special distribution to our stockholders, including, without limitation, any transaction in which our stockholders either receive, or have the option to receive, cash, securities redeemable for cash, and/or securities of a publicly traded company, or (iii) a listing or partial listing of our common stock on a national securities exchange. The fee to be paid in connection with a disposition will be equal to, as applicable, 1.0% of the total consideration paid and debt assumed and/or incurred in connection with a disposition described in clauses (i) and (ii) above or 1.0% of the gross market capitalization (reflective of total asset value) of the Company (or applicable portion thereof) upon the occurrence of a full or partial listing of our common stock on a national securities exchange. There is no disposition fee in connection with any dispositions that occur outside of a liquidity event transaction.

In addition, the Advisory Agreement also includes certain terms and provisions related to the facilitation of our planned launch of the DST Program, pursuant to which a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership intends to raise capital through the sale of beneficial interests in Delaware statutory trusts holding real properties, including properties currently indirectly owned by the Operating Partnership.

Seventh Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement

On February 16, 2021, in connection with the DST Program, we, on our own behalf as general partner and on behalf of the limited partners thereto, entered into the Seventh Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement (the “Operating Partnership Agreement”). The Operating Partnership Agreement amends the prior limited partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership in order to facilitate the issuance of units of limited partnership interest in exchange for beneficial interests in Delaware statutory trusts issued pursuant to the DST Program. The Operating Partnership Agreement also establishes three series of Class T units of limited partnership interest, Series 1 Class T Units, Series 2 Class T Units and Series 3 Class T Units, in order to align with the interests that will be offered pursuant to the DST Program.

119

ITEM 9.        CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A.      CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the direction of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of December 31, 2020. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2020, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based upon criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013). Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2020.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the year ended December 31, 2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We have not experienced any material impact to our internal control over financial reporting to date as a result of many of the employees of our Advisor and its affiliates working remotely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We are continually monitoring and assessing the COVID-19 pandemic on our internal controls to minimize the impact to their design and operating effectiveness.

ITEM 9B.      OTHER INFORMATION

None.

120

PART III

ITEM 10.       DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item will be included under the headings “Board of Directors,” “Executive Officers,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” and “Corporate Governance” in our definitive proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and such required information is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 11.       EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item will be included under the heading “Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers” in our definitive proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and such required information is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12.       SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item will be included under the heading “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in our definitive proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and such required information is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 13.       CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item will be included under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in our definitive proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and such required information is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14.       PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item will be included under the heading “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” in our definitive proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and such required information is incorporated herein by reference.

121

PART IV

ITEM 15.        EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)   1. Financial Statements—The financial statements are included under Item 8 of this report.

2. Financial Statement Schedule—The following financial statement schedule is included in Item 15(c):

Schedule III—Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation.

All other financial statement schedules are not required under the related instructions or because the required information has been disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and the notes related thereto.

(b)   Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K:

EXHIBIT NUMBER	DESCRIPTION
3.1	Third Articles of Amendment and Restatement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-200594) filed with the SEC on June 30, 2017 (“Pre-Effective Amendment”).
3.2	Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc. (formerly known as Industrial Logistics Realty Trust Inc.). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Quarterly Report on form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 9, 2017.
3.3	Articles of Amendment. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 4, 2020.
4.1	Share Redemption Program, effective as of February 16, 2021. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021.
4.2	Fourth Amended and Restated Distribution Reinvestment Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 29, 2019.
4.3	Form of Subscription Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-229136) on August 30, 2019.
4.4*	Description of Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
10.1	Seventh Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of BCI IV Operating Partnership LP, dated as of February 16, 2021. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021.
10.2	Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement (2021), dated February 16, 2021, by and among Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc., BCI IV Operating Partnership LP and BCI IV Advisors LLC. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021.
10.3	Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan of Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc. (formerly known as Industrial Logistics Realty Trust Inc.), effective July 1, 2016. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1.
10.4	Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc. (formerly known as Industrial Logistics Realty Trust Inc.) and each of Evan H. Zucker, Dwight L. Merriman III, Thomas G. McGonagle,

122

EXHIBIT NUMBER	DESCRIPTION
	Joshua J. Widoff, Marshall M. Burton, Charles B. Duke, Stanley A. Moore and John S. Hagestad as of February 9, 2016, Rajat Dhanda as of May 17, 2017, Scott W. Recknor as of September 1, 2017, Jeffrey W. Taylor as of December 9, 2019 and Scott A. Seager as of August 12, 2020. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-200594) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 1, 2016.
10.5	Selected Dealer Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2019, by and among Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc., BCI IV Advisors LLC, Black Creek Capital Markets, LLC, BCI IV Advisors Group LLC, and Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 1, 2019.
10.6	Cost Reimbursement Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2019, by and among Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc., BCI IV Advisors LLC, Black Creek Capital Markets, LLC, BCI IV Advisors Group LLC, and American Enterprise Investment Services, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 1, 2019.
10.7	Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 19, 2019, by and among BCI IV Operating Partnership LP, a Delaware limited partnership, as the Borrower; the lenders from time to time who are parties thereto; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent and as a lender, Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent and as a lender, U.S. Bank National Association, as Revolving Credit Facility Documentation Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Existing Term Facility Documentation Agent, Regions Bank, as Incremental Term Facility Documentation Agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 22, 2019.
10.8	Form of Director Stock Grant Agreement for Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan of Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 6, 2019.
10.9	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Consultants for Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan of Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 6, 2019.
10.10	Private Placement Equity Incentive Plan of Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc., dated September 25, 2018. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 6, 2019.
10.11	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Private Placement Equity Incentive Plan of Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 6, 2019.
10.12	Amended and Restated Dealer Manager Agreement, dated February 16, 2021, by and among Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc., BCI IV Advisors LLC and Black Creek Capital Markets, LLC. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021.
10.13	Incremental Revolving Commitment Assumption Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2019, among BCI IV Operating Partnership LP, Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc. and its subsidiaries, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Bank of America, N.A. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2020.
10.14	Incremental Term Loan and Revolving Commitment Assumption Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2019, among BCI IV Operating Partnership LP, Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc. and its subsidiaries, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Zions Bancorporation, N.A. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2020.

123

EXHIBIT NUMBER	DESCRIPTION
10.15	Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2020, by and among BCI IV Portfolio Real Estate Holdco LLC and Industrial Property Operating Partnership LP. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 10, 2020.
10.16	Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Build-To-Core Industrial Partnership I LP, dated December 30, 2016, by and among IPT BTC I GP LLC, IPT BTC I LP LLC, Industrial Property Advisors Sub I LLC, bcIMC (WCBAF) Realpool Global Investment Corporation, bcIMC (College) US Realty Inc., bcIMC (Municipal US Realty Inc., bcIMC (Public Service) US Realty Inc., bcIMC (Teachers) US Realty Inc., bcIMC (WCB) US Realty Inc., and bcIMC (Hydro) US Real Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 10, 2020.
10.17	First Amendment to the Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Build-To-Core Industrial Partnership I LP, dated as of July 15, 2020, by IPT BTC I GP LLC. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 10, 2020.
10.18	Agreement of Limited Partnership of Build-To-Core Industrial Partnership II LP, dated as of May 19, 2017, by and among IPT BTC II GP LLC, IPT BTC II LP LLC, Industrial Property Advisors Sub IV LLC, BCG BTC II Investors LLC, bcIMC (WCBAF) Realpool Global Inestment Corporation, bcIMC (College) US Realty Inc., bcIMC (Municipal) US Realty Inc., bcIMC (Public Service) US Realty Inc., bcIMC (Teachers) US Realty Inc., bcIMC (WCB) US Realty Inc., bcIMC (Hydro) US Realty Inc., and QuadReal US Holdings Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 10, 2020.
10.19	First Amendment to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Build-To-Core Industrial Partnership II LP, dated January 31, 2018, by and among IPT BTC II GP LLC, IPT BTC II LP LLC, Industrial Property Advisors Sub IV LLC, BCG BTC II Investors LLC, bcIMC (WCBAF) Realpool Global Investment Corporation, bcIMC (College) US Realty Inc., bcIMC (Municipal) US Realty Inc., bcIMC (Public Service) US Realty Inc., bcIMC (Teachers) US Realty Inc., bcIMC (WCB) US Realty Inc., bcIMC (Hydro) US Realty Inc., and QuadReal US Holdings Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 10, 2020.
10.20	Second Amendment to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Build-To-Core Industrial Partnership II LP, dated as of May 10, 2019, by and among IPT BTC II GP LLC, IPT BTC II LP LLC, Industrial Property Advisors Sub IV LLC, BCG BTC II Investors LLC, QR Master Holdings USA II LP and QuadReal US Holdings Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 10, 2020.
10.21	Third Amendment to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of Build-To-Core Industrial Partnership II LP, dated as of July 15, 2020, by IPT BTC II GP LLC. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 10, 2020.
10.22	Second Amended and Restated Agreement, dated as of September 15, 2016, by and among IPT BTC I GP LLC, Industrial Property Advisors Sub I LLC, and Industrial Property Advisors LLC. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 10, 2020.
10.23	First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2020, by and among IPT BTC I GP LLC and Industrial Property Advisors Sub I LLC. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 10, 2020.
10.24	Agreement, dated as of May 19, 2017, by and among IPT BTC II GP LLC and Industrial Property Advisors Sub III LLC. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 10, 2020.

124

EXHIBIT NUMBER	DESCRIPTION
10.25	First Amendment to the Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2020, by and among IPT BTC II GP LLC and Industrial Property Advisors Sub III LLC. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 10, 2020.
10.26*	Assignment of Membership Interest, dated as of January 12, 2021 and effective as of December 22, 2020, by and among Industrial Property Advisors Sub I LLC, Industrial Property Advisors Sub II LLC and IPT BTC I GP LLC.
10.27*	Letter Amendment, dated as of January 12, 2021 and effective as of December 22, 2020, by and between IPT BTC I GP LLC, QR Master Holdings USA II LP, IPT BTC I LP LLC and Industrial Property Advisors Sub I LLC.
10.28*	Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2019, by and among BCIMC (College) US Realty Inc., BCIMC (Municipal) US Realty Inc., BCIMC (Public Service) US Realty Inc., BCIMC (Teachers) US Realty Inc., BCIMC (WCB) US Realty Inc., BCIMC (Hydro) US Realty Inc., BCIMC (WCBAF) Realpool Global Investment Corporation, QR Master Holdings USA II LP and IPT BTC I GP LLC.
21.1*	List of Subsidiaries of Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc.
23.1*	Consent of KPMG LLP (Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm).
31.1*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1**	Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.1*	Consent of Altus Group U.S., Inc.
99.2	Net Asset Value Calculation and Valuation Procedures. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-229136) filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021.
101	The following materials from Black Creek Industrial REIT IV Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, filed on March 5, 2021, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (vi) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vii) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

*     Filed herewith.

**   Furnished herewith.

125

BLACK CREEK INDUSTRIAL REIT IV INC.

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

											Costs								Accumulated
											Capitalized or		Gross Amount Carried as of						Depreciation
					Initial Cost to Company						Adjustments		December 31, 2020 (2)						and			Depreciable
	# of						Buildings and		Total		Subsequent to				Buildings and		Total		Amortization		Acquisition	Life
($in thousands)	Buildings	Debt			Land		Improvements (2)		Costs		Acquisition		Land		Improvements (2)		Costs (4)		(4)		Date	(Years)
Consolidated Industrial Properties:
Ontario Industrial Center in Ontario, CA	1	$		(1)	$	5,225	$	5,370	$	10,595	$	631	$	5,225	$	6,001	$	11,226	$	(1,183)	2/26/2018	1-20
Medley Industrial Center in Medley, FL	1		—			2,864		4,559		7,423		309		2,864		4,868		7,732		(661)	4/11/2018	1-30
Ontario Distribution Center in Ontario, CA	1		—			14,657		16,101		30,758		123		14,657		16,224		30,881		(3,111)	5/17/2018	1-20
Park 429 Logistics Center in Ocoee, FL	2		—			7,963		36,919		44,882		277		7,963		37,196		45,159		(3,287)	6/7/2018	1-40
Pescadero Distribution Center in Tracy, CA	1			(1)		5,602		40,021		45,623		59		5,602		40,080		45,682		(4,020)	6/20/2018	1-40
Gothard Industrial Center in Huntington Beach, CA	1			(1)		5,325		4,771		10,096		80		5,325		4,851		10,176		(772)	6/25/2018	1-20
Midway Industrial Center in Odenton, MD	1		—			4,579		3,548		8,127		398		4,579		3,946		8,525		(984)	10/22/2018	1-20
Executive Airport Distribution Center I in Henderson, NV	1		—			10,360		40,710		51,070		215		10,360		40,925		51,285		(4,057)	11/20/2018	1-40
Iron Run Distribution Center in Allentown, PA	1		—			5,483		10,039		15,522		156		5,483		10,195		15,678		(1,364)	12/04/2018	1-20
Elgin Distribution Center in Elgin, IL	1		—			4,032		16,951		20,983		71		4,032		17,022		21,054		(1,117)	12/11/2018	1-40
Addison Distribution Center II in Addison, IL	1		—			4,439		8,009		12,448		528		4,439		8,537		12,976		(1,096)	12/21/2018	1-30
Fontana Distribution Center in Fontana, CA	1		—			20,558		21,943		42,501		101		20,558		22,044		42,602		(4,159)	12/28/2018	1-20
Airport Industrial Center in Ontario, CA	1		—			4,085		4,051		8,136		215		4,085		4,266		8,351		(1,030)	01/08/2019	1-20
Kelly Trade Center in Austin, TX	1		—			2,686		12,654		15,340		243		2,686		12,897		15,583		(1,771)	01/31/2019	1-30
7A Distribution Center in Robbinsville, NJ	1		—			4,874		7,277		12,151		286		4,874		7,563		12,437		(1,274)	02/11/2019	1-20
Quakerbridge Distribution Center in Hamilton, NJ	1		—			2,334		6,260		8,594		277		2,334		6,537		8,871		(1,556)	03/11/2019	1-40
Hebron Airpark Logistics Center in Hebron, KY	1		—			2,228		9,572		11,800		41		2,228		9,613		11,841		(843)	05/30/2019	1-40
Las Vegas Light Industrial Portfolio in Las Vegas, NV	4		—			19,872		39,399		59,271		356		19,872		39,755		59,627		(4,294)	05/30/2019	1-30
Monte Vista Industrial Center in Chino, CA	1		—			7,947		7,592		15,539		256		7,947		7,848		15,795		(1,233)	06/07/2019	1-20
King of Prussia Core Infill Portfolio in King of Prussia, PA	5		—			14,791		17,187		31,978		699		14,791		17,886		32,677		(2,583)	06/21/2019	1-20
Dallas Infill Industrial Portfolio in Arlington, TX	3		38,000			17,159		74,981		92,140		718		17,159		75,699		92,858		(7,276)	06/28/2019	1-30
Dallas Infill Industrial Portfolio in Garland, TX	2		11,250			3,545		20,370		23,915		—		3,545		20,370		23,915		(1,281)	06/28/2019	1-40
Edison Distribution Center in Edison, NJ	1		—			11,519		16,079		27,598		32		11,519		16,111		27,630		(1,641)	06/28/2019	1-20
395 Distribution Center in Reno, NV	2		—			8,904		45,114		54,018		101		8,904		45,215		54,119		(2,798)	08/05/2019	1-40
I-80 Distribution Center in Reno, NV	4			(1)		18,742		53,267		72,009		1,750		18,742		55,017		73,759		(3,887)	09/04/2019	1-40
Avenue B Industrial Center in Bethlehem, PA	1		—			2,461		4,652		7,113		65		2,461		4,717		7,178		(526)	09/11/2019	1-20
485 Distribution Center in Shiremanstown, PA	1		—			8,427		34,632		43,059		142		8,427		34,774		43,201		(2,124)	09/13/2019	1-40
Weston Business Center in Weston, FL	1		—			15,661		16,750		32,411		113		15,661		16,863		32,524		(1,215)	12/10/2019	1-20
Marigold Distribution Center in Redlands, CA	1		—			17,230		22,505		39,735		98		17,230		22,603		39,833		(2,140)	12/20/2019	1-30
Bishops Gate Distribution Center in Mount Laurel, NJ	1		—			8,068		24,158		32,226		107		8,068		24,265		32,333		(1,826)	12/31/2019	1-20
Norcross Industrial Center in Peachtree Corner, GA	1		—			4,086		5,419		9,505		1,767		4,086		7,186		11,272		—	3/23/2020	1-20
Port 146 Distribution Center in LaPorte, TX	1		—			2,577		6,994		9,571		1,052		2,577		8,046		10,623		—	4/14/2020	1-40
Lima Distribution Center in Denver, CO	1		—			2,313		9,309		11,622		30		2,313		9,339		11,652		(517)	4/15/2020	1-20
Valwood Crossroads in Carrollton, TX	2		—			21,312		48,687		69,999		78		21,312		48,765		70,077		(1,741)	5/11/2020	1-40
Eaglepoint LC in Brownsburg, IN	1		—			6,875		33,341		40,216		51		6,875		33,392		40,267		(1,164)	5/26/2020	1-40
7A DC II in Robbinsville Township, NJ	1		—			7,887		15,331		23,218		466		7,887		15,797		23,684		(627)	5/27/2020	1-20
Legacy Logistics Center in Salt Lake City, UT	1			(1)		8,223		31,495		39,718		1,982		8,223		33,477		41,700		(995)	6/3/2020	1-40
Logistics Center at 33 in Easton, PA	1		—			13,157		50,128		63,285		48		13,157		50,176		63,333		(1,556)	6/4/2020	1-40
Intermodal Logistics Center in Fort Worth, TX	1		—			7,531		21,097		28,628		109		7,531		21,206		28,737		(500)	6/29/2020	1-40
Executive Airport Distribution Center II, III in Henderson, NV	2		—			9,490		23,710		33,200		1,239		9,490		24,949		34,439		—	9/3/2020	1-40
Airpark International Logistics Center in Hebron, KY	2		—			4,410		25,791		30,201		82		4,410		25,873		30,283		(262)	10/9/2021	1-40
Carlstadt Industrial Center in Carlstadt, NJ	2		—			17,616		19,914		37,530		110		17,616		20,024		37,640		(286)	11/10/2020	1-20
Nelson Industrial Center in La Puente, CA	1		—			4,233		4,799		9,032		32		4,233		4,831		9,064		(39)	12/7/2020	1-40
Miraloma Industrial Center in Placentia, CA	1		—	���		5,113		4,385		9,498		25		5,113		4,410		9,523		(27)	12/10/2020	1-20
Pennsy Logistics Center in Landover, MD	2		—			9,545		50,552		60,097		13		9,545		50,565		60,110		(101)	12/18/2020	1-30
Total	65	$	167,750		$	385,988	$	976,393	$	1,362,381	$	15,531	$	385,988	$	991,924	$	1,377,912	$	(72,924)

(1) These properties include a $118.5 million mortgage note as of December 31, 2020. This borrowing is non-recourse and secured by deeds of trust for the eight collateralized buildings. The mortgage note has a maturity date of November 1, 2027 and an interest rate of 2.90%. See “Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for more detail.

(2) Includes gross intangible lease assets of $119.8 million and gross intangible lease liabilities of $17.5 million.

(3) As of December 31, 2020, the aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes of investments in property was $1.4 billion (unaudited).

(4) A summary of activity for investment in real estate properties is as follows:

(in thousands)	2020		2019
Investment in real estate properties:
Balance at beginning of period	$	891,170	$	300,713
Acquisition of properties		475,320		587,033
Improvements		11,451		3,424
Write-off of intangibles and customer leasing costs		(29)		—
Balance at end of period	$	1,377,912	$	891,170
Accumulated depreciation and amortization:
Balance at beginning of period	$	(25,988)	$	(3,556)
Additions charged to costs and expenses		(46,965)		(22,432)
Write-off of intangibles and customer leasing costs		29		—
Balance at end of period	$	(72,924)	$	(25,988)

126

ITEM 16.        SUMMARY OF FORM 10-K

See the “Table of Contents” for a summary of information included in this Form 10-K.

127

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on March 5, 2021.

BLACK CREEK INDUSTRIAL REIT IV INC.
By:	/s/ JEFFREY W. TAYLOR
	Jeffrey W. Taylor Managing Director, Co-President (Principal Executive Officer)
By:	/s/ SCOTT A. SEAGER
	Scott A. Seager Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Jeffrey W. Taylor, Scott A. Seager and Joshua J. Widoff (with full power to act alone), as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full powers of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitute or substitutes, lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/S/ EVAN H. ZUCKER	Chairman of the Board and Director	March 5, 2021
Evan H. Zucker
/S/ MARSHALL M. BURTON	Director	March 5, 2021
Marshall M. Burton
/S/ CHARLES B. DUKE	Director	March 5, 2021
Charles B. Duke
/S/ JOHN S. HAGESTAD	Director	March 5, 2021
John S. Hagestad
/S/ STANLEY A. MOORE	Director	March 5, 2021
Stanley A. Moore
/s/ DWIGHT L. MERRIMAN III	Director	March 5, 2021
Dwight L. Merriman III
/s/ JEFFREY W. TAYLOR	Managing Director, Co-President	March 5, 2021
Jeffrey W. Taylor	(Principal Executive Officer)
/S/ SCOTT A. SEAGER	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer	March 5, 2021
Scott A. Seager	(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

128