| SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies) | 9 Months Ended |
| Sep. 30, 2015 |
| Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
| Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Basis of Accounting and Presentation The unaudited interim financial statements of the Company as of September 30, 2015 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) which apply to interim financial statements. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, such information contains all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for future quarters or for the year ending December 31, 2015. As disclosed above, the exchange of shares of AEC New York for the shares of AEC Nevada, has been treated as a transaction between entities under common control, similar to a pooling of interest, whereby the assets and liabilities are recorded at their carrying values. Based upon this treatment, the equity section of AEC New York has been recast as if this transaction had occurred at the beginning of the earliest period being presented and accordingly, as if the 10,563,000 The consolidated financial statements are comprised of AEC Nevada and its wholly owned subsidiary, AEC New York. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. |
| Receivables, Trade and Other Accounts Receivable, Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Accounts Receivable The Company carries its accounts receivable at cost less an allowance for doubtful accounts if required. On a periodic basis, management evaluates accounts receivable balances and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts, based on history of past write-offs and collections, when necessary. As of September 30, 2015, the Company considers all accounts receivable to be fully collectible and, therefore, did not provide for an allowance for doubtful accounts. |
| Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Revenue Recognition Revenue is recorded pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605, Revenue Recognition Before 2014, consulting fees were generally paid in advance. Consulting services that had refund provisions were recognized when such provisions have been fulfilled and the refund provisions no longer existed. In 2014, the Company discontinued utilizing the refund provisions in its consulting agreements and recognizes deferred revenue based on completion of the services. The Company offers a limited refund policy to students who have received consulting services regarding their H1B visas. Services for H1B consulting are prepaid. The Company prepares the filing for the visas for $ 2,000 |
| Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Concentration of Credit and Business Risk The Company maintains its cash accounts at a commercial bank. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) covers $ 250,000 The following table represents certain information about the Company’s major customers which individually accounted for more than 10 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 Accounts Amount % Receivable % Customer 1 $ 825,050 18.0 % $ 210,000 26.3 % Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 Accounts Amount % Receivable % Customer 2* $ 380,000 22.8 % $ - - *Harvard Management Associates, Inc. (“HMA”), an affiliate wholly owned by the Company’s President/Chairman/Chief Financial Officer/Secretary (see Note 7). |
| Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes 50 181,000 ASC 740 also addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under ASC 740, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position would be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. ASC 740 also provides guidance on derecognition of income tax assets and liabilities, classification of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, and accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company does not have a liability for any unrecognized tax benefits. |
| Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Fair Value of Financial Measurements FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement Level 1 Inputs Unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets and liabilities in an active market that the Company has the ability to access. Level 2 Inputs Inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 3 Inputs Inputs based on prices or valuation techniques that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurements. FASB ASC 820 requires the use of observable market data, when available, in making fair value measurements. When inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company did not identify any assets or liabilities that are required to be presented at fair value on a recurring basis. Non-derivative financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, loan from stockholder and advances from clients. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the carrying values of these financial instruments approximated their fair values due to their short term nature. |
| Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
| Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Earnings (Loss) per Share Earnings (loss) per share is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 260, Earnings Per Share |
