KBS Growth & Income REIT (KBSG) 424B3 Prospectus supplement

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)

Registration No. 333-207471

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

SUPPLEMENT NO. 6 DATED AUGUST 11, 2017

TO THE PROSPECTUS DATED APRIL 28, 2017

This document supplements, and should be read in conjunction with, the prospectus of KBS Growth & Income REIT, Inc. dated April 28, 2017, as supplemented by supplement no. 1 dated April 28, 2017, supplement no. 2 dated April 28, 2017 supplement no. 3 dated May 12, 2017, supplement no. 4 dated June 27, 2017 and supplement no. 5 dated July 10, 2017. As used herein, the terms “we,” “our” and “us” refer to KBS Growth & Income REIT, Inc. and, as required by context, KBS Growth & Income Limited Partnership, which we refer to as our “Operating Partnership,” and to their subsidiaries. Capitalized terms used in this supplement have the same meanings as set forth in the prospectus. The purpose of this supplement is to disclose:

• the status of the offering;

• updated risks related to an investment in us;

• information regarding cash distributions and stock dividends;

• information regarding our indebtedness;

• our entry into an amended and restated advisory agreement;

• our estimated net asset value (“NAV”) per share;

• advisor payment to stockholders;

• information regarding our distribution reinvestment plan;

• information regarding our share redemption program;

• “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” similar to that filed in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2017; and

• our unaudited financial statements and the notes thereto as of and for the period ended June 30, 2017.

Status of the Offering

We terminated our primary initial public offering effective June 30, 2017 and expect to launch a private offering solely to accredited investors pursuant to Rule 506(c) of Regulation D of the Securities Act in the third quarter of 2017. We can give no assurance regarding the success of such private offering. We are continuing to offer shares of common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan offering.

As of August 4, 2017, we had sold 399,606 and 275,576 shares of Class A and Class T common stock in this initial public offering, respectively, for gross offering proceeds of $6.7 million. Included in these amounts are 276,885 and 5,161 shares of Class A and Class T common stock sold pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, respectively, for aggregate gross offering proceeds of $2.7 million. As of August 4, 2017, there were $797,254,927 of shares available under our distribution reinvestment plan.

Risk Factors

The following risk factor supplements the risk factor appearing in the prospectus.

We have paid distributions from advances from our advisor and debt financing. In the future we may continue to pay distributions from financings, including an advance from our advisor, and we may not pay distributions solely from our cash flow from operations. To the extent we pay distributions from sources other than our cash flows from operations, we will have less funds available for investment in assets, the overall return to our stockholders may be reduced and subsequent investors will experience dilution.

We expect to have little, if any, cash flow from operations available for distribution until we make substantial investments, and we therefore expect that portions of distributions made during our first few years of operations will be considered a return of capital. During our offering stage, when we may raise capital more quickly than we acquire income-producing assets, and for some period after our offering stage, we may not be able to pay distributions solely from our cash flow from operations, in which case distributions may be paid in whole or in part from debt financing, including advances from our advisor. Our distributions paid through June 30, 2017 have been paid from cash flow from operating activities, advances from our advisor and debt financing and we expect that in the future we may not pay distributions solely from our cash flow from operations.

1

We may fund distributions from any source, including, without limitation, offering proceeds or borrowings (which may constitute a return of capital). We may also fund such distributions from the sale of assets or from the maturity, payoff or settlement of debt investments. If we fund distributions from borrowings, our interest expense and other financing costs, as well as the repayment of such borrowings, will reduce our earnings and cash flow from operations available for distribution in future periods. If we fund distributions from the sale of assets or the maturity, payoff or settlement of debt investments, this will affect our ability to generate cash flow from operations in future periods. To the extent that we pay distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operations, we will have fewer funds available with which to make real estate investments, the overall return to our stockholders may be reduced and subsequent investors will experience dilution. In addition, to the extent distributions exceed cash flow from operations, a stockholder’s basis in our stock will be reduced and, to the extent distributions exceed a stockholder’s basis, the stockholder may recognize capital gain. There is no limit on the amount of distributions we may fund from sources other than from cash flow from operations.

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, we paid aggregate distributions of $2.3 million, including $1.1 million of distributions paid in cash and $1.2 million of distributions reinvested through our distribution reinvestment plan. We funded our total distributions paid, which includes net cash distributions and distributions reinvested by stockholders, with $1.3 million of cash flows from operations and $1.0 million of debt financing. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, our cash flows from operations to distributions paid coverage ratio was 71% and our funds from operations to distributions paid coverage ratio was 129%.

Information Regarding Cash Distributions and Stock Dividends

Cash Distributions Paid

On July 5, 2017, we paid cash distributions of $0.4 million and $9,073, which related to Class A and Class T cash distributions, respectively, declared for daily record dates for each day in the period from June 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017. On August 1, 2017, we paid cash distributions of $0.4 million and $11,709, which related to Class A and Class T cash distributions, respectively, declared for daily record dates for each day in the period from July 1, 2017 through July 31, 2017.

Stock Dividends Issued

On July 6, 2017, we issued 7,566 shares of Class A common stock and 229 shares of Class T common stock in connection with stock dividends declared for each share of common stock outstanding on June 30, 2017. On August 2, 2017, we issued 7,589 shares of Class A common stock and 230 shares of Class T common stock in connection with stock dividends declared for each share of common stock outstanding on July 31, 2017.

Distributions and Dividends Authorized

On July 7, 2017, our board of directors authorized cash distributions on the outstanding shares of all classes of our common stock based on daily record dates for the period from August 1, 2017 through August 31, 2017, which we expect to pay in September 2017. Investors may choose to receive cash distributions or purchase additional shares through our distribution reinvestment plan. Distributions for this period will be calculated based on stockholders of record each day during this period at a rate of $0.00136986 per share per day.

On August 9, 2017, our board of directors authorized cash distributions on the outstanding shares of all classes of our common stock based on daily record dates for the period from September 1, 2017 through September 30, 2017, which we expect to pay in October 2017, and the period from October 1, 2017 through October 31, 2017, which we expect to pay in November 2017. Investors may choose to receive cash distributions or purchase additional shares through our distribution reinvestment plan. Distributions for these periods will be calculated based on stockholders of record each day during these periods at a rate of $0.00131849 per share per day.

On July 7, 2017, our board of directors authorized stock dividends of 0.00083333 shares of common stock on each outstanding share of common stock to all stockholders of record as of the close of business on August 31, 2017, which we expect to issue in September 2017. Stock dividends are issued in the same class of shares as the shares for which such stockholder received the stock dividend.

For more information regarding distributions, see “Risk Factors” above and “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations —Distributions” below.

Indebtedness

As of June 30, 2017, we had $73.5 million of mortgage debt outstanding. Our mortgage debt consisted of two variable rate notes payable that mature in 2019 and 2021. In addition, as of June 30, 2017, we entered into a $10.0 million unsecured, revolving line of credit with an unaffiliated lender that matures on January 8, 2018. As of June 30, 2017, $10.0 million of the unsecured revolving credit facility remained available for future disbursements, subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the loan documents. As of June 30, 2017, our aggregate borrowings were approximately 53% of our net assets before deducting depreciation and other non-cash reserves.

2

Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement

On August 9, 2017, we entered an amended and restated advisory agreement with our advisor. The material changes to the amended and restated advisory agreement are as follows: elimination of the payment of an acquisition fee to our advisor; changes to the calculation of our asset management fee as described below; and undertaking that our advisor will pay all organization and offering expenses related to our proposed private offering pursuant to Rule 506(c) of Regulation D under the Securities Act. As amended, our asset management fee will be a monthly fee equal to one-twelfth of 1.0% of the cost of our investments. The cost of our investments will include any portion of the investment that is debt financed and excludes any acquisition and origination fees paid to our advisor.

Estimated Net Asset Value Per Share

On August 9, 2017, our board of directors approved an estimated NAV per share of our common stock of $8.75 based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, or NAV, divided by the number of shares outstanding, all as of June 30, 2017. There have been no material changes between June 30, 2017 and the date of this filing that would impact the overall estimated NAV per share.

The conflicts committee, composed solely of all of our independent directors, is responsible for the oversight of the valuation process used to determine the estimated NAV per share of our common stock, including the review and approval of the valuation process and methodology used to determine our estimated NAV per share, the consistency of the valuation and appraisal methodologies with real estate industry standards and practices, and the reasonableness of the assumptions used in the valuations and appraisals. With the approval of the conflicts committee, we engaged Duff & Phelps, LLC (“Duff & Phelps”), an independent third party real estate valuation firm, to provide a calculation of the range in estimated NAV per share of our common stock as of June 30, 2017. Duff & Phelps based this range in estimated NAV per share upon appraisals of our three real estate properties owned as of June 30, 2017 (the “Appraised Properties”) performed by Duff & Phelps and valuations performed by our advisor with respect to our cash, other assets, mortgage debt and other liabilities. The appraisal reports Duff & Phelps prepared summarized the key inputs and assumptions involved in the appraisal of each of the Appraised Properties. Duff & Phelps’ valuation was designed to follow the prescribed methodologies of Practice Guideline 2013-01, Valuations of Publicly Registered Non-Listed REITs, issued by the Investment Program Association (“IPA”) in April 2013. The methodologies and assumptions used to determine the estimated value of our assets and the estimated value of our liabilities are described further below.

Upon the conflicts committee’s receipt and review of Duff & Phelps’ valuation report, which included the appraised value of each of the Appraised Properties as noted in the appraisal reports prepared by Duff & Phelps and a summary of the estimated value of each of our other assets and liabilities as determined by our advisor and reviewed by Duff & Phelps, and in light of other factors considered by the conflicts committee and the conflicts committee’s own extensive knowledge of our assets and liabilities, the conflicts committee: (i) concluded that the range in estimated NAV per share of $8.01 to $9.53, with a mid-range value of $8.75 per share, as indicated in Duff & Phelps’ valuation report and recommended by our advisor, which mid-range value was based on Duff & Phelps’ appraisals of the Appraised Properties and valuations performed by our advisor of our cash, other assets, mortgage debt and other liabilities, was reasonable and (ii) recommended to the board of directors that it adopt $8.75 as the estimated NAV per share of our common stock, which mid-range value was determined by Duff & Phelps and recommended by our advisor and which was based on Duff & Phelps’ appraisals of the Appraised Properties and valuations performed by our advisor of our cash, other assets, mortgage debt and other liabilities. The board of directors unanimously agreed to accept the recommendation of the conflicts committee and approved $8.75 as the estimated NAV per share of our common stock, which determination is ultimately and solely the responsibility of the board of directors.

The table below sets forth the calculation of our estimated NAV per share as of August 9, 2017. Duff & Phelps is not responsible for establishing the estimated NAV per share as of August 9, 2017.

Real estate properties	$	16.08
Cash	0.94
Other assets	0.04
Mortgage debt	(7.86		)
Other liabilities	(0.45		)
Estimated NAV per share	8.75
Estimated enterprise value premium	None assumed
Total estimated NAV per share	$	8.75

3

As of June 30, 2017, we had sold 9,353,910 shares of common stock in our private offering, separate private transactions and this offering, including pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, at an average price of approximately $9.05 per share. The table below summarizes the significant factors that explain the difference between the average price at which we have sold shares of our common stock and our estimated NAV per share. The changes below reflect, among other changes through June 30, 2017: the impact of various organization and offering costs related to our private offering and this offering through June 30, 2017; acquisition-related costs and expenses; distributions; and the changes in the fair value of our assets since their acquisition and our liabilities since their incurrence.

	Estimated Value			Calculation of Estimated Value per Share
	(in thousands)
Average offering price (1)	$	83,560		$	9.05
Offering costs	(6,983		)	(0.76		)
Net offering proceeds	76,577			8.29
Changes due to acquisition related costs, distributions and stockholder servicing fees
Acquisition-related costs	(3,301		)	(0.36		)
Deferred financing costs	(1,823		)	(0.20		)
Cash distributions declared and stockholder servicing fees in excess of operating cash flow	(3,301		)	(0.36		)
Total changes due to acquisition related costs, cash distributions and stockholder servicing fees	(8,425		)	(0.92		)
Changes to fair value of real estate
Real estate	14,089			1.53
Capital expenditures on real estate	(459		)	(0.04		)
Total changes to fair value of real estate	13,630			1.49
Changes to fair value of other assets and liabilities
Other changes, net (2)	62			—
Total changes to fair value of other assets and liabilities	62			—
Stock distributions declared	—			(0.11		)
	$	81,844		$	8.75

_____________________

⁽¹⁾ Average offering price presented is calculated based on the number of shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2017. Through June 30, 2017, the Company had sold 9,353,910 shares of common stock in our private offering, separate private transactions, and this offering for gross offering proceeds of $83.6 million, or an average of $9.05 per share. This includes 314,956 shares of common stock sold under our distribution reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $3.0 million, or an average of $9.67 per share and reflects redemptions as of June 30, 2017 of 7,602 shares for $0.1 million, or an average of $8.50 per share.

⁽²⁾ “Other changes, net” consists of various unrelated insignificant items.

As with any valuation methodology, the methodologies used are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may not be accurate or complete. Different parties using different assumptions and estimates could derive a different estimated NAV per share of our common stock, and these differences could be significant. In particular, due in part to our relatively small asset base and the number of shares of our common stock outstanding, even modest changes in key assumptions made in appraising our real estate properties could have a very significant impact on the estimated value of our shares. See the discussion under “Real Estate - Real Estate Valuation” below. The estimated NAV per share is not audited and does not represent the fair value of our assets less the fair value of our liabilities according to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), nor does it represent a liquidation value of our assets and liabilities or the price at which our shares of common stock would trade on a national securities exchange. The estimated NAV per share does not reflect a discount for the fact that we are externally managed, nor does it reflect a real estate portfolio premium/discount versus the sum of the individual property values. The estimated NAV per share also does not take into account estimated disposition costs and fees for real estate properties, debt prepayment penalties that could apply upon the prepayment of certain of our debt obligations and the impact of restrictions on the assumption of debt. The estimated NAV per share does not take into consideration acquisition-related costs and financing costs related to future acquisitions. As of June 30, 2017, we had no potentially dilutive securities outstanding that would impact the estimated NAV per share of our common stock.

4

Our estimated NAV per share takes into consideration any potential liability related to a subordinated participation in cash flows our advisor is entitled to upon meeting certain stockholder return thresholds in accordance with the advisory agreement. For purposes of determining the estimated NAV per share, our advisor calculated the potential liability related to this incentive fee based on a hypothetical liquidation of our assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values, after considering the impact of any potential closing costs and fees related to the disposition of real estate properties, and determined that there would be no liability related to the subordinated participation in cash flows.

Methodology

Our goal for the valuation was to arrive at a reasonable and supportable estimated NAV per share, using a process that was designed to be in compliance with the IPA Valuation Guidelines and using what we and our advisor deemed to be appropriate valuation methodologies and assumptions. The following is a summary of the valuation and appraisal methodologies, assumptions and estimates used to value our assets and liabilities:

Real Estate

Independent Valuation Firm

Duff & Phelps⁽¹⁾ was selected by our advisor and approved by our conflicts committee and board of directors to appraise each of the Appraised Properties and to provide a calculation of the range in estimated NAV per share of our common stock as of August 9, 2017. Duff & Phelps is engaged in the business of appraising commercial real estate properties and is not affiliated with us or our advisor. The compensation we paid to Duff & Phelps was based on the scope of work and not on the appraised values of the Appraised Properties. The appraisals were performed in accordance with the Code of Ethics and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, or USPAP, the real estate appraisal industry standards created by The Appraisal Foundation, as well as the requirements of the state where each real property is located. Each appraisal was reviewed, approved and signed by an individual with the professional designation of MAI (Member of the Appraisal Institute). The use of the reports is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives.

Duff & Phelps collected all reasonably available material information that it deemed relevant in appraising the Appraised Properties. Duff & Phelps obtained property-level information from our advisor, including (i) property historical and projected operating revenues and expenses; (ii) property lease agreements; and (iii) information regarding recent or planned capital expenditures. Duff & Phelps reviewed and relied in part on the property-level information provided by our advisor and considered this information in light of its knowledge of each property’s specific market conditions.

In conducting its investigation and analyses, Duff & Phelps took into account customary and accepted financial and commercial procedures and considerations as it deemed relevant. Although Duff & Phelps reviewed information supplied or otherwise made available by us or our advisor for reasonableness, it assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all such information and of all information supplied or otherwise made available to it by any other party and did not independently verify any such information. With respect to operating or financial forecasts and other information and data provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with Duff & Phelps, Duff & Phelps assumed that such forecasts and other information and data were reasonably prepared in good faith on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of our management and/or our advisor. Duff & Phelps relied on us to advise it promptly if any information previously provided became inaccurate or was required to be updated during the period of its review.

_____________________

⁽¹⁾ Duff & Phelps is actively engaged in the business of appraising commercial real estate properties similar to those owned by us in connection with public securities offerings, private placements, business combinations and similar transactions. We engaged Duff & Phelps to prepare appraisal reports for each of the Appraised Properties and to provide a calculation of the range in estimated NAV per share of our common stock and Duff & Phelps received fees upon the delivery of such reports and the calculation of the range in estimated NAV per share of our common stock. In addition, we have agreed to indemnify Duff & Phelps against certain liabilities arising out of this engagement. In the two years prior to the date of this filing, Duff & Phelps and its affiliates have provided a number of commercial real estate, appraisal, valuation and financial advisory services for our affiliates and have received fees in connection with such services. Duff & Phelps and its affiliates may from time to time in the future perform other commercial real estate, appraisal, valuation and financial advisory services for us and our affiliates in transactions related to the properties that are the subjects of the appraisals, so long as such other services do not adversely affect the independence of the applicable Duff & Phelps appraiser as certified in the applicable appraisal report.

5

In performing its analyses, Duff & Phelps made numerous other assumptions as of various points in time with respect to industry performance, general business, economic and regulatory conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond its and our control, as well as certain factual matters. For example, unless specifically informed to the contrary, Duff & Phelps assumed that we had clear and marketable title to each of the Appraised Properties, that no title defects existed, that any improvements were made in accordance with law, that no hazardous materials were present or had been present previously, that no deed restrictions existed, and that no changes to zoning ordinances or regulations governing use, density or shape were pending or being considered. Furthermore, Duff & Phelps’ analyses, opinions and conclusions were necessarily based upon market, economic, financial and other circumstances and conditions existing as of or prior to the date of the appraisals, and any material change in such circumstances and conditions may affect Duff & Phelps’ analyses and conclusions. Duff & Phelps’ appraisal reports contain other assumptions, qualifications and limitations that qualify the analyses, opinions and conclusions set forth therein. Furthermore, the prices at which the Appraised Properties may actually be sold could differ from their appraised values.

Although Duff & Phelps considered any comments to its appraisal reports received from us or our advisor, the appraised values of the Appraised Properties were determined by Duff & Phelps. The appraisal reports for the Appraised Properties are addressed solely to us to assist in the calculation of the range in estimated NAV per share of our common stock. The appraisal reports are not addressed to the public and may not be relied upon by any other person to establish an estimated NAV per share of our common stock and do not constitute a recommendation to any person to purchase or sell any shares of our common stock. In preparing its appraisal reports, Duff & Phelps did not solicit third-party indications of interest for the Appraised Properties. In preparing its appraisal reports and in calculating the range in estimated NAV per share of the Company’s common stock, Duff & Phelps did not, and was not requested to, solicit third-party indications of interest for our common stock in connection with possible purchases thereof or the acquisition of all or any part of us.

The foregoing is a summary of the standard assumptions, qualifications and limitations that generally apply to Duff & Phelps’ appraisal reports. All of the Duff & Phelps appraisal reports, including the analyses, opinions and conclusions set forth in such reports, are qualified by the assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth in the respective appraisal reports.

Real Estate Valuation

Duff & Phelps appraised each of the Appraised Properties using various methodologies including the direct capitalization approach, discounted cash flow analyses and sales comparison approach and relied primarily on 10-year discounted cash flow analyses for the final appraisal of each of the Appraised Properties. Duff & Phelps calculated the discounted cash flow value of each of the Appraised Properties using property-level cash flow estimates, terminal capitalization rates and discount rates that fall within ranges it believes would be used by similar investors to value the Appraised Properties, based on recent comparable market transactions adjusted for unique properties and market-specific factors.

As of June 30, 2017, the Appraised Properties consisted of three office buildings, which were acquired for a total purchase price of $136.3 million, exclusive of acquisition fees and acquisition expenses of $3.3 million, in which we had invested $0.5 million in capital and tenant improvements. As of June 30, 2017, the total appraised value of the Appraised Properties as provided by Duff & Phelps using the appraisal methods described above was $150.4 million. The total appraised value of the Appraised Properties as of June 30, 2017, compared to the total acquisition cost of the Appraised Properties plus subsequent capital improvements through June 30, 2017, results in an overall increase in the value of the Appraised Properties of approximately 10.0%.

The following table summarizes the key assumptions that were used in the discounted cash flow analyses to arrive at the appraised value of the Appraised Properties:

	Range in Values	Weighted-Average Basis
Terminal capitalization rate	5.5% to 7.5%	6.3%
Discount rate	7.5% to 8.25%	7.88%
Net operating income compounded annual growth rate (1)	3.98% to 6.33%	5.32%

_____________________

⁽¹⁾ The net operating income compounded annual growth rates (“CAGRs”) reflect both the contractual and market rents and reimbursements (in cases where the contractual lease period is less than the hold period of the property) net of expenses over the holding period. The range of CAGRs shown is the constant annual rate at which the net operating income is projected to grow to reach the net operating income in the final year of the hold period for each of the properties.

6

While we believe that Duff & Phelps’ assumptions and inputs are reasonable, a change in these assumptions and inputs would significantly impact the appraised value of the Appraised Properties and thus, our estimated NAV per share. The table below illustrates the impact on our estimated NAV per share if the terminal capitalization rates or discount rates Duff & Phelps used to appraise the Appraised Properties were adjusted by 25 basis points, assuming all other factors remain unchanged. Additionally, the table below illustrates the impact on our estimated NAV per share if these terminal capitalization rates or discount rates were adjusted by 5% in accordance with the IPA Valuation Guidelines, assuming all other factors remain unchanged:

	Increase (Decrease) on the Estimated NAV per Share due to
	Decrease of 25 basis points		Increase of 25 basis points			Decrease of 5%		Increase of 5%
Terminal capitalization rate	$	0.46	$	(0.43	)	$	0.55	$	(0.53	)
Discount Rate	0.31		(0.30		)	0.49		(0.49		)

Finally, a 1% increase in the appraised value of the Appraised Properties would result in an $0.16 increase in our estimated NAV per share and a 1% decrease in the appraised value of the Appraised Properties would result in a decrease of $0.16 to our estimated NAV per share, assuming all other factors remain unchanged.

Notes Payable

The estimated values of our notes payable are equal to the GAAP fair values disclosed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2017, but do not equal the book value of the loans in accordance with GAAP. Our advisor estimated the values of our notes payable using a discounted cash flow analysis. The discounted cash flow analysis was based on projected cash flow over the remaining loan terms, including extensions we expect to exercise, and management’s estimates of current market interest rates for instruments with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value ratio and type of collateral.

As of June 30, 2017, the GAAP fair value and carrying value (excluding unamortized deferred financing costs of $1.1 million) of our notes payable were $73.5 million and $73.5 million, respectively. The weighted-average discount rate applied to the future estimated debt payments, which have a weighted-average remaining term of 3.3 years, was approximately 3.85%.

The table below illustrates the impact on our estimated NAV per share if the discount rates our advisor used to value our notes payable were adjusted by 25 basis points, assuming all other factors remain unchanged. Additionally, the table below illustrates the impact on our estimated NAV per share if these discount rates were adjusted by 5% in accordance with the IPA Valuation Guidelines, assuming all other factors remain unchanged:

	Increase (Decrease) on the Estimated NAV per Share due to
	Decrease of 25 basis points			Increase of 25 basis points		Decrease of 5%			Increase of 5%
Discount Rate	$	(0.06	)	$	0.06	$	(0.05	)	$	0.05

Other Assets and Liabilities

The carrying values of a majority of our other assets and liabilities are considered to equal their fair value due to their short maturities or liquid nature. Certain balances, such as straight-line rent receivables, lease intangible assets and liabilities, deferred financing costs, unamortized lease commissions and unamortized lease incentives, have been eliminated for the purpose of the valuation due to the fact that the value of those balances was already considered in the valuation of the related asset or liability. Our advisor has also excluded redeemable common stock as temporary equity does not represent a true liability to us and the shares that this amount represents are included in our total outstanding shares of common stock for purposes of determining our estimated NAV per share.

7

Limitations of Estimated NAV per Share

As with any valuation methodology, the methodologies used are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may not be accurate or complete. Different parties with different assumptions and estimates could derive a different estimated NAV per share, and these differences could be significant. The estimated NAV per share is not audited and does not represent the fair value of our assets less the fair value of our liabilities according to GAAP.

Accordingly, with respect to our estimated NAV per share, we can give no assurance that:

• a stockholder would be able to resell his or her shares at our estimated NAV per share;

• a stockholder would ultimately realize distributions per share equal to our estimated NAV per share upon liquidation of our assets and settlement of the its liabilities or a sale of our company;

• our shares of common stock would trade at our estimated NAV per share on a national securities exchange;

• a third party would offer our estimated NAV per share in an arm’s-length transaction to purchase all or substantially all of our shares of common stock;

• another independent third-party appraiser or third-party valuation firm would agree with the Company’s estimated NAV per share; or

• the methodology used to determine our estimated NAV per share would be acceptable to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or for compliance with ERISA reporting requirements.

Further, our estimated NAV per share is based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, divided by the number of shares outstanding, all as of June 30, 2017. As of June 30, 2017, we had 9,079,039 and 274,871 shares of common stock issued and outstanding of Class A and Class T common stock, respectively. We did not make any adjustments to our estimated NAV subsequent to June 30, 2017, including, adjustments relating to the following, among others: (i) the issuance of common stock and the payment of related offering costs; (ii) net operating income earned and distributions declared; and (iii) the redemption of shares. The value of our shares will fluctuate over time in response to developments related to future investments, the performance of individual assets in our portfolio and the management of those assets and the real estate and finance markets. Our estimated NAV per share does not reflect a discount for the fact that we are externally managed, nor does it reflect a real estate portfolio premium/discount versus the sum of the individual property values. Our estimated NAV per share does not take into account estimated disposition costs and fees for real estate properties, debt prepayment penalties that could apply upon the prepayment of certain of our debt obligations or, the impact of restrictions on the assumption of debt. Our estimated NAV per share does not take into consideration acquisition-related costs and financing costs related to future acquisitions. We currently expects to utilize our advisor and/or an independent valuation firm to update the offering price per share annually in December. We cannot assure you that our estimated NAV per share will increase or that it will not decrease.

Advisor Payment to Stockholders

As previously announced, following our announcement of an estimated NAV per share, our advisor has agreed to pay stockholders any difference between the “net price paid” by such stockholder (defined as the gross purchase price paid by the stockholder less selling commissions and dealer manager fees associated with the sale of the shares to such stockholder) and the estimated NAV per share. The payment would be calculated with respect to each outstanding stockholder at the time of payment. The payment to certain stockholders would effectively reimburse the stockholders for costs incurred, to the extent not recovered from value appreciation from our investments, related to the following items: (i) the other organization and offering expenses we incurred in connection with this public offering and our private offering; (ii) the acquisition and financing fees and expenses incurred in connection with the acquisition and financing of our investments; (iii) the impact of distributions in excess of operating cash flows to date and (iii) the impact of shares of our Class A common stock sold at a discount prior to this public offering in private transactions. This cash payment would be funded entirely by our advisor, without any payment or reimbursement from us and would be ineligible for reinvestment through our distribution reinvestment plan. We expect the payment to our stockholders to be made prior to the end of the third quarter of 2017. The tax treatment of the payment is not entirely clear, and stockholders should consult with their tax advisor to determine the tax consequences to such stockholder with respect to any payment received by them.

8

Distribution Reinvestment Plan

On August 9, 2017, our board of directors adopted an amended and restated distribution reinvestment plan to change the price at which shares are purchased pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan and remove certain provisions that are no longer applicable. There were no other changes to the plan. Effective August 20, 2017 (which date is 10 days’ following notice of the change), shares sold pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan will be purchased at the estimated net asset value in effect as of the date of purchase. As such, commencing on the next distribution reinvestment plan purchase date, which is September 1, 2017, participants will acquire shares of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan at a price of $8.75 per share.

If a participant wishes to terminate participation in our distribution reinvestment plan effective for the September 1, 2017 purchase date, participants must notify us in writing of such decision, and we must receive the notice at least four business days prior to the last business day prior to the payment of such distribution, or by the close of business on August 25, 2017 in the case of the September 1, 2017 distribution date.

Notice of termination should be sent to:

Regular Mail
KBS Growth & Income REIT, Inc. c/o DST Systems, Inc. PO Box 219015 Kansas City, MO 64121-9015 Overnight Address
KBS Growth & Income REIT, Inc. c/o DST Systems, Inc. 430 W. 7th Street Kansas City, MO 64105

Share Redemption Program

Our share redemption program contains numerous restrictions on your ability to redeem your shares. Among other restrictions, during each calendar year, redemptions are limited to the amount of net proceeds from the sale of shares under our distribution reinvestment plan during the prior calendar year, provided that we may increase or decrease the funding available for the redemption of shares upon 10 business days’ notice. This restriction may significantly limit your ability to have your shares redeemed pursuant to our share redemption program.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we redeemed $0.1 million of shares of common stock. Based on the redemption limitations described above, as of June 30, 2017, there was $1.7 million available for eligible redemptions for the remainder of 2017.

In accordance with our share redemption program, after we establish an estimated NAV per share of its common stock, the redemption price for shares eligible for redemption will be calculated based upon the estimated NAV per share.  Redemptions made in connection with a stockholder’s death, “qualifying disability” or “determination of incompetence” (each as defined in the share redemption program) are made at a price per share equal to the most recent estimated NAV per share as of the applicable redemption date. The price at which we will redeem all other shares eligible for redemption is 95.0% of our estimated NAV per share as of the applicable redemption date, provided the redeeming stockholder has held his or her shares for at least one year.

We redeem shares on the last business day of each month.  Effective for the August 31, 2017 redemption date, the redemption price for all stockholders will be calculated based on the estimated NAV per share.  For a stockholder’s shares to be eligible for redemption in a given month or to withdraw a redemption request, we must receive a written notice from the stockholder or from an authorized representative of the stockholder in good order and on a form approved by us at least five business days before the redemption date, or by August 24, 2017 in the case of the August 31, 2017 redemption date.

Our board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate our share redemption program upon 30 days’ notice to our stockholders, provided that we may increase or decrease the funding available for the redemption of shares upon 10 business days’ notice. We may provide this notice by including such information in a Current Report on Form 8-K or in our annual or quarterly reports, all publicly filed with the SEC, or by a separate mailing to our stockholders.

Experts

Duff & Phelps, an independent third party real estate valuation firm, appraised each of the Appraised Properties and used these appraisal reports to provide a calculation of the range in estimated NAV per share of our common stock, which mid-range value was recommended by our advisor.

9

Forward-Looking Statements

The foregoing includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We intend that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of the company and members of its management team, as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based, and generally are identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “should” or similar expressions. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time, unless required by law. Such statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. We make no representation or warranty (express or implied) about the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements. These statements are based on a number of assumptions involving the judgment of management. The appraisal methodology for the Appraised Properties assumes the properties realize the projected net operating income and expected exit cap rates and that investors would be willing to invest in such properties at yields equal to the expected discount rates. Though the appraisals of the Appraised Properties, with respect to Duff & Phelps, and the valuation estimates used in calculating the estimated value per share, with respect to Duff & Phelps, our advisor and us, are the respective party’s best estimates as of June 30, 2017, we can give no assurance in this regard. Even small changes to these assumptions could result in significant differences in the appraised values of the Appraised Properties and the estimated value per share. These statements also depend on factors such as: future economic, competitive and market conditions; our ability to maintain occupancy levels and rental rates at its real estate properties; and other risks identified in our prospectus. Actual events may cause the value and returns on our investments to be less than that used for purposes of our estimated NAV per share.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto as of and for the period ended June 30, 2017, included in this supplement, as well as our consolidated financial statements as of and for the period ended December 31, 2016 and the related notes thereto, all included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 and incorporated by reference into this prospectus.

This discussion contains forward-looking statements that can be identified with the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “should” or similar expressions. Actual results may differ from those described in forward-looking statements. For a discussion of the factors that could cause actual results to differ from those anticipated, see “Risk Factors” in this supplement, supplement no. 8 to the prospectus, and in the prospectus.

Overview

We were formed on January 12, 2015 as a Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2015 and we intend to continue to operate in such a manner. Substantially all of our business is conducted through our Operating Partnership, of which we are the sole general partner. Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, our business is externally managed by our advisor pursuant to an advisory agreement. KBS Capital Advisors manages our operations and our portfolio of core real estate properties. KBS Capital Advisors also provides asset-management, marketing, investor-relations and other administrative services on our behalf. Our advisor acquired 20,000 shares of our Class A common stock for an initial investment of $200,000. We have no paid employees.

We commenced a private placement offering exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), on June 11, 2015, pursuant to which we offered a maximum of $105,000,000 of shares of our Class A common stock for sale to certain accredited investors, of which $5,000,000 of Class A shares were being offered pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. We ceased offering shares in the primary portion of our private offering on April 27, 2016 and processed subscriptions for the primary portion of the private offering dated on or prior to April 27, 2016 through May 30, 2016. KBS Capital Markets Group LLC, an affiliate of our advisor, served as the dealer manager of the offering pursuant to a dealer manager agreement and was responsible for marketing our shares in the offering.

We had sold 8,548,972 shares of our Class A common stock for gross offering proceeds of $76.8 million in our private offering, including 74,744 shares of our Class A common stock under our distribution reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $0.7 million.

10

Additionally, on August 11, 2015, two of the individuals who own and control our sponsor, Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. (who also acts as our chief executive officer and chairman of the board and as a director) and Peter M. Bren (who also acts as our president and a director), purchased 21,181.2380 and 21,181.2390 shares of our Class A common stock, respectively, each for an aggregate purchase price of $172,500 or $8.144 per share. The per share purchase price reflects an 8.5% discount to the $8.90 offering price in our private offering in effect on the date of their purchase because selling commissions and dealer manager fees were not paid in connection with the sales. Mr. Bren’s investment was made on behalf of and for the account of three of his children, and he has disclaimed beneficial ownership of the shares. We issued these shares in private transactions exempt from the registration requirements pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

On February 4, 2015, we filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the SEC to register this initial public offering to offer a maximum of $1,500,000,000 in shares of common stock for sale to the public in the primary offering, consisting of two classes of shares: Class A and Class T. We are also offering a maximum of $800,000,000 in both classes of shares of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. The SEC declared our registration effective on April 28, 2016 and we retained KBS Capital Markets Group LLC to serve as the dealer manager of this initial public offering. The dealer manager was responsible for marketing our shares in the initial public offering.

We terminated our primary initial public offering effective June 30, 2017 and expect to launch a private offering solely to accredited investors pursuant to Rule 506(c) of Regulation D of the Securities Act in the third quarter of 2017. We can give no assurance regarding the success of such private offering. We are continuing to offer shares of common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan offering.

As of June 30, 2017, we had sold 358,017 and 273,787 shares of Class A and Class T common stock in the public offering, respectively, for aggregate gross offering proceeds of $6.3 million, including 236,839 and 3,372 shares of Class A and Class T common stock under our distribution reinvestment plan, respectively, for aggregate gross offering proceeds of $2.4 million. Also as of June 30, 2017, we had redeemed 7,602 Class A shares for $64,655.

We intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds from our offerings to invest in a diverse portfolio of core real estate properties and real estate-related assets. We consider core properties to be existing properties with at least 80% occupancy. Based on the current market outlook, we expect our core focus in the U.S. office sector to reflect a value-creating core strategy, which is also known as a core-plus strategy. The real estate-related assets in which we may invest include mortgage, mezzanine, bridge and other loans, debt and derivative securities related to real estate assets, including mortgage-backed securities, and equity securities such as common stocks, preferred stocks and convertible preferred securities of other REITs and real estate companies. As of June 30, 2017, we owned three office properties.

KBS Capital Advisors makes recommendations on all investments to our board of directors. All proposed real estate investments must be approved by at least a majority of our board of directors, including a majority of the conflicts committee. Unless otherwise provided by our charter, the conflicts committee may approve a proposed real estate investment without action by the full board of directors if the approving members of the conflicts committee constitute at least a majority of the board of directors.

We elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2015. If we meet the REIT qualification requirements, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on the income that we distribute to our stockholders each year. If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any year after electing REIT status, our income will be taxed at regular corporate rates, and we may be precluded from qualifying for treatment as a REIT for the four-year period following our failure to qualify. Such an event could materially and adversely affect our net income and cash available for distribution to our stockholders. However, we are organized and will operate in a manner that will enable us to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2015, and we will continue to operate so as to remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes thereafter.

Market Outlook – Real Estate and Real Estate Finance Markets

The following discussion is based on management’s beliefs, observations and expectations with respect to the real estate and real estate finance markets.

Current economic data and financial market developments suggest that the global economy is improving, although at a slow and uneven pace. European economic growth has recently picked up, with improving employment data in most of the European Union countries. The U.K. and China remain areas of concern. The U.K. is working through its BREXIT process, whereas the Chinese economy has shown signs of stabilization, but is still struggling with uncertainty in its banking system in relation to bad loans. Against this backdrop, the central banks of the world’s major industrialized economies are beginning to back away from their strong monetary accommodation. Quantitative easing in Japan and Europe is slowing, but the liquidity generated from these programs continues to impact the global capital markets.

11

At a duration of 97 months (as of the end of second quarter 2017), the current business cycle, which commenced in June 2009, is the fourth longest in U.S. history, including the post-World War II cycle that lasted 58 months. In June of 2017, the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “FED”) increased interest rates for the fourth time in three years. Expectations are now mixed for further rate increases, as signs of inflation have been weakening. The FED is still hoping to normalize the level of interest rates in the United States. However, little in the U.S. macroeconomic data suggests that the economy is growing too rapidly or that inflation is accelerating. Real gross domestic product (“GDP”) growth has averaged approximately 2% per year over the past two years, and job growth has averaged about 1.7% over the same period. Personal income growth has started to pick up and unemployment statistics indicate that labor force conditions are finally showing real improvements. Uncertainty surrounding the new administration’s budget, plans to revamp the Affordable Care Act, the future of the Chair of the FED, and the continued weakness in retailers, all may adversely impact business and consumer confidence.

The U.S. commercial real estate market continues to benefit from inflows of foreign capital, albeit at a slowing rate. With a backdrop of global political conflict, and stabilizing international economic conditions, the U.S. dollar’s position as a haven currency took a hit as the dollar’s value against other major global currencies declined for most of the second quarter. An easing in demand for U.S. commercial real estate is reflected in the slowing of transaction volumes. The industrial property sector is the lone standout, as internet sales volumes continue to increase the demand for warehouses and logistics-related assets. Traditional sources of capital are favoring a “risk-off” approach, as capital flows have shifted equity towards debt, or secured, investing. Commercial real estate returns are increasingly being driven by property income (yield), as opposed to price appreciation through cap rate compression.

Lenders with long memories remain disciplined in their underwriting of investments. For balance sheet lenders, such as banks and insurance companies, underwriting standards for commercial real estate have tightened. This has resulted in lower loan-to-value and higher debt coverage ratios. CMBS originations also have been limited as lenders are attempting to adjust to new securitization rules which require issuers to maintain an ongoing equity stake in pooled transactions. These trends have led to increased uncertainty in the level and cost of debt for commercial properties, and in turn has injected some volatility into commercial real estate markets.

A major factor contributing to the strength of the real estate cycle is the difficulty of securing construction financing. Lack of construction financing is effectively keeping an oversupply of commercial real estate, which is typical late in a real estate cycle, from emerging. Bank regulators and new risk-based capital guidelines have enforced discipline in lending, which has helped reduce new construction.

Impact on Our Real Estate Investments

The volatility in the global financial markets and political environment continues to cause a level of uncertainty in our outlook for the performance of the U.S. commercial real estate markets. Both the investing and leasing environments are highly competitive. While foreign capital continues to flow into U.S. real estate markets, albeit at a slower rate, concerns regarding the political, regulatory and economic environments has introduced uncertainty into the markets. Possible future declines in rental rates, slower or potentially negative net absorption of leased space and expectations of future rental concessions, including free rent to renew tenants early, to retain tenants who are up for renewal or to attract new tenants, may result in decreases in cash flows. Historically low interest rates could help offset some of the impact of these potential decreases in operating cash flow for properties financed with variable rate mortgages; however, interest rates in the United States have started to increase. The FED raised interest rates four times between the period December 2015 and June 2017. The real estate and finance markets anticipate further rate increases as long as the economy remains strong, but a flattening U.S. treasury yield curve is signaling a weakening in economic conditions, and highlights the degree of uncertainty surrounding the near-term U.S. economic prospects. Management continuously reviews our debt financing strategies to optimize the cost of our debt exposure.

Impact on Our Financing Activities

In light of the risks associated with potentially volatile operating cash flows from some of our real estate properties, and the possible increase in the cost of financing due to higher interest rates, we may have difficulty refinancing some of our debt obligations prior to or at maturity or we may not be able to refinance these obligations at terms as favorable as the terms of our existing indebtedness. Short-term interest rates in the United States have increased, but the certainty regarding future increases has diminished. Market conditions can change quickly, potentially negatively impacting the value of our investments.

12

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We are dependent upon the net proceeds from our offering stage to conduct our proposed operations. We will obtain the capital required to make real estate and real estate-related investments and conduct our operations from the proceeds of our offering stage, from secured or unsecured financings from banks and other lenders and from any undistributed funds from our operations. As of June 30, 2017, we had raised approximately $83.1 million in gross offering proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock in our private offering, separate private transactions and this initial public offering. We terminated our primary initial public offering effective June 30, 2017 and expect to launch a private offering solely to accredited investors pursuant to Rule 506(c) of Regulation D of the Securities Act in the third quarter of 2017. We can give no assurance regarding the success of such private offering. We continue to offer shares of common stock under our distribution reinvestment plan.

If we are unable to raise substantial funds during our offering stage, we will make fewer investments resulting in less diversification in terms of the type, number and size of investments we make and the value of an investment in us will fluctuate more significantly with the performance of the specific assets we acquire. Further, we will have certain fixed operating expenses, including certain expenses as a publicly offered REIT, regardless of whether we are able to raise substantial funds during our offering stage. Our inability to raise substantial funds would increase our fixed operating expenses as a percentage of gross income, reducing our net income and cash flow and limiting our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. We expect to establish a modest working capital reserve from our offering proceeds for maintenance and repairs of real properties, as we expect the vast majority of leases for the properties we acquire will provide for tenant reimbursement of operating expenses. However, to the extent that we have insufficient funds for such purposes, we may establish additional reserves from gross offering proceeds, out of cash flow from operations or net cash proceeds from the sale of properties.

As of June 30, 2017, we owned three office properties that were 95% occupied. We acquired these investments with the proceeds from the sale of our common stock in the private offering and debt financing, including a bridge loan from our advisor that we have since repaid. Operating cash needs during the six months ended June 30, 2017 were met through cash flow generated by our real estate investments and with proceeds from our private offering and initial public offering.

Our investments in real estate generate cash flow in the form of rental revenues and tenant reimbursements, which are reduced by operating expenditures, capital expenditures, debt service payments, the payment of asset management fees and corporate general and administrative expenses. Cash flow from operations from real estate investments will be primarily dependent upon the occupancy level of our portfolio, the net effective rental rates on our leases, the collectibility of rent and operating recoveries from our tenants and how well we manage our expenditures.

Our advisor advanced funds to us, which are non-interest bearing, for distribution record dates through the period ended May 31, 2016. We are only obligated to repay our advisor for its advance if and to the extent that:

(i) Our modified funds from operations (“MFFO”), as such term is defined by the Investment Program Association and interpreted by us, for the immediately preceding month exceeds the amount of distributions declared for record dates of such prior month (an “MFFO Surplus”), and we will pay our advisor the amount of the MFFO Surplus to reduce the principal amount outstanding under the advance, provided that such payments shall only be made if management in its sole discretion expects an MFFO Surplus to be recurring for at least the next two calendar quarters, determined on a quarterly basis; or

(ii) Excess proceeds from third-party financings are available (“Excess Proceeds”), provided that the amount of any such Excess Proceeds that may be used to repay the principal amount outstanding under the advance shall be determined by the conflicts committee in its sole discretion.

In determining whether Excess Proceeds are available to repay the advance, our conflicts committee will consider whether cash on hand could have been used to reduce the amount of third-party financing provided to us. If such cash could have been used instead of third-party financing, the third-party financing proceeds will be available to repay the advance.

We expect that once we have fully invested the proceeds raised during our offering stage, our debt financing and other liabilities will be between 35% and 65% of the cost of our tangible assets (before deducting depreciation and other non-cash reserves). Though this is our target leverage, our charter does not limit us from incurring debt until our aggregate borrowings would exceed 300% of our net assets (before deducting depreciation and other non-cash reserves), though we may exceed this limit under certain circumstances. To the extent financing in excess of this limit is available at attractive terms, the conflicts committee may approve debt in excess of this limit. As of June 30, 2017, our aggregate borrowings were approximately 53% of our net assets before deducting depreciation and other non-cash reserves.

In addition to making investments in accordance with our investment objectives, we have used a portion of our capital resources to make certain payments to our advisor, our dealer manager and our affiliated property manager. These payments include payments to our dealer manager for selling commissions, the dealer manager fee and the stockholder servicing fee, and payments to the dealer manager and our advisor for reimbursement of certain organization and other offering expenses. See “—Organization and Offering Costs” below.

13

We will make payments to our advisor in connection with the management of our assets and costs incurred by our advisor in providing services to us. Through August 8, 2017, the asset management fee payable to our advisor was a monthly fee equal to one-twelfth of 1.6% of the cost of our investments, less any debt secured by or attributable to our investments. As of August 9, 2017, the asset management fee will be a monthly fee payable to our advisor in an amount equal to one-twelfth of 1.0% of the cost of our investments including the portion of the investment that is debt financed. The cost of our real property investments is calculated as the amount paid or allocated to acquire the real property, plus budgeted capital improvement costs for the development, construction or improvements to the property once such funds are disbursed pursuant to a final approved budget and fees and expenses related to the acquisition, but excluding acquisition fees paid or payable to our advisor. The cost of our real estate-related investments and any investments other than real property is calculated as the lesser of: (x) the amount paid or allocated to acquire or fund the investment, including fees and expenses related to the acquisition or origination (but excluding acquisition or origination fees paid or payable to our advisor), and (y) the outstanding principal amount of such investment, including fees and expenses related to the acquisition or funding of such investment (but excluding acquisition or origination fees paid or payable to our advisor). In the case of investments made through joint ventures, the asset management fee is determined based on our proportionate share of the underlying investment. Our advisor agreed to waive asset management fees for the second and third quarters of 2017.

We also pay fees to the Co-Manager, an affiliate of our advisor, pursuant to property management agreements with the Co-Manager, for certain property management services at our properties.

We elected to be taxed as a REIT and to operate as a REIT beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2015. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we will be required to make aggregate annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (computed without regard to the dividends-paid deduction and excluding net capital gain). Our board of directors may authorize distributions in excess of those required for us to maintain REIT status depending on our financial condition and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant. Provided we have sufficient available cash flow, we intend to authorize and declare cash distributions based on daily record dates and pay cash distributions on a monthly basis. During our offering stage, we also intend to authorize and declare stock dividends based on monthly record dates and to issue stock dividends on a monthly basis. We have not established a minimum distribution level.

Under our charter, we are required to limit our total operating expenses to the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of our net income for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters, as these terms are defined in our charter, unless the conflicts committee has determined that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. Operating expenses for the four fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2017 did not exceed the charter-imposed limitation.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

As of June 30, 2017, we owned three office properties. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, net cash provided by operating activities was $1.6 million. We expect that our cash flows from operating activities will increase in future periods to the extent we make additional acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related investments and the related operations of such investments.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and consisted of cash for improvements to real estate.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, net cash used in financing activities was $8.2 million and consisted primarily of the following:

• $9.4 million of net cash used in debt financing as a result of principal payments on notes payable of $11.3 million and payments of deferred financing costs of $0.1 million, partially offset by proceeds from notes payable of $2.0 million;

• $2.4 million of net cash provided by offering proceeds related to this public offering, net of payments of commissions, dealer manager fees and other organization and offering costs of $0.1 million; and

• $1.1 million of net cash distributions, after giving effect to distributions reinvested by stockholders of $1.2 million.

14

Contractual Commitments and Contingencies

The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2017 (in thousands).

			Payments Due During the Years Ending December 31,
Contractual Obligations	Total		Remainder of 2017		2018-2019		2020-2021		Thereafter
Outstanding debt obligations (1)	$	73,500	$	—	$	32,500	$	41,000	$	—
Interest payments on outstanding debt obligations (2)	7,904		1,222		4,706		1,976		—

_____________________

⁽¹⁾ Amounts include principal payments only.

⁽²⁾ Projected interest payments are based on the outstanding principal amount, maturity date and contractual interest rate in effect as of June 30, 2017. We incurred interest expense of $1.2 million, excluding amortization of deferred financing costs totaling $0.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Results of Operations

Overview

We conducted this primary initial public offering from April 28, 2016 through June 30, 2017 and are continuing to offer shares in our distribution reinvestment plan offering. Prior to this, we conducted a private placement offering exempt from registration under the Securities Act, that commenced on June 11, 2015. We ceased offering shares in the primary portion of the private offering on April 27, 2016 and processed subscriptions for the primary portion of the private offering dated on or prior to April 27, 2016 through May 30, 2016. Our results of operations as of June 30, 2017 are not indicative of those expected in future periods as we commenced investment operations on August 12, 2015 in connection with our first investment and have since been raising money in and investing the proceeds from our offerings. As of June 30, 2016, we owned two office properties. We acquired one office property after June 30, 2016 and owned three office properties as of June 30, 2017. The results of operations presented for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 are not directly comparable due to our acquisition activity. In general, we expect that our income and expenses related to our portfolio will increase in future periods to the extent we make additional acquisitions of real estate investments.

Comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2017 versus the three months ended June 30, 2016

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,					Increase (Decrease)			Percentage Change		$ Change Due to Acquisitions (1)		$ Change Due to Property  Held Throughout Both Periods (2)
	2017			2016
Rental income	$	3,290		$	589	$	2,701		459	%	$	2,699	$	2
Tenant reimbursements	877			51		826			1,620	%	793		33
Other operating income	20			—		20			100	%	18		2
Operating, maintenance and management costs	878			186		692			372	%	703		(11		)
Property management fees	31			10		21			210	%	22		(1		)
Real estate taxes and insurance	513			74		439			593	%	439		—
Asset management fees to affiliate	—			39		(39		)	(100	)%	—		(39		)
Real estate acquisition fees to affiliate	—			1,383		(1,383		)	(100	)%	n/a		n/a
Real estate acquisition fees and expenses	—			229		(229		)	(100	)%	n/a		n/a
General and administrative expenses	422			367		55			15	%	n/a		n/a
Depreciation and amortization	1,822			218		1,604			736	%	1,602		2
Interest expense	757			95		662			697	%	616		46
Interest and other income	18			54		(36		)	(67	)%	—		(36		)
Loss from extinguishment of debt	(206		)	—		(206		)	(100	)%	—		(206		)

_____________________

⁽¹⁾Represents the dollar amount increase for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016 related to real estate investments acquired on or after April 1, 2016.

⁽²⁾ Represents the dollar amount increase (decrease) for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016 with

respect to the real estate investment owned by us throughout both periods presented.

15

Rental income and tenant reimbursements increased from $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 to $4.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, primarily as a result of the growth in our real estate portfolio. We expect that rental income and tenant reimbursements to increase in future periods to the extent we make additional acquisitions of real estate investments.

Operating, maintenance, and management costs increased from $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 to $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, primarily as a result of the growth in our real estate portfolio. We expect operating, maintenance, and management expenses to increase in future periods to the extent we make additional acquisitions of real estate investments.

Real estate taxes and insurance increased from $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 to $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, primarily as a result of the growth in our real estate portfolio. We expect real estate taxes and insurance to increase in future periods as a result of inflation and to the extent we make additional acquisitions of real estate investments.

Asset management fees to affiliate for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was $39,000 for this period. Asset management fees to our affiliate for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $0.2 million, all of which were waived by our advisor. We amended our advisory agreement on August 9, 2017 to change how asset management fees are calculated. We expect asset management fees to increase in future periods as a result of this change and also to the extent we make additional real estate investments.

Real estate acquisition fees and expenses to affiliate and non-affiliates were $1.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. During the three months ended June 30, 2016, we acquired one real estate property for $68.5 million. During the three months ended June 30, 2017, we did not acquire any real estate properties. We amended our advisory agreement on August 9, 2017 to eliminate the payment of an acquisition fee to our advisor. We do not expect to incur real estate acquisition fees to affiliates going forward. In addition, we adopted ASU No. 2017-01 for the reporting period beginning January 1, 2017.  As a result of the adoption of ASU No. 2017-01, our acquisitions of real estate properties beginning January 1, 2017 qualified as asset acquisitions as opposed to business combinations.  Transaction costs associated with asset acquisitions are capitalized, while transaction costs associated with business combinations will continue to be expensed.

Depreciation and amortization increased from $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 to $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, primarily as a result of the growth in our real estate portfolio. We expect depreciation and amortization to increase in future periods to the extent we make additional acquisitions of real estate investments.

Interest expense increased from $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 to $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017. Included in interest expense is the amortization of deferred financing costs of $15,485 and $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2017, respectively. The increase in interest expense is primarily due to increased borrowings in connection with the acquisition of real estate, resulting in an increase in the average loan balance. We expect interest expense to increase in future periods as a result of anticipated borrowings to the extent we make additional acquisitions of real estate investments.

During the three months ended June 30, 2017, we recognized a loss from extinguishment of debt of $0.2 million related to the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs as a result of the pay-off of the Von Karman Tech Center Mortgage Loan on May 9, 2017.

16

Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2017 versus the six months ended June 30, 2016

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,					Increase (Decrease)			Percentage Change		$ Change Due to Acquisitions (1)		$ Change Due to Property  Held Throughout Both Periods (2)
	2017			2016
Rental income	$	6,526		$	1,157	$	5,369		464	%	$	5,361	$	8
Tenant reimbursements	1,656			79		1,577			1,996	%	1,507		70
Other operating income	38			—		38			100	%	36		2
Operating, maintenance and management costs	1,623			337		1,286			382	%	1,336		(50		)
Property management fees	60			17		43			253	%	43		—
Real estate taxes and insurance	970			143		827			578	%	832		(5		)
Asset management fees to affiliate	214			59		155			263	%	174		(19		)
Real estate acquisition fees to affiliate	—			1,383		(1,383		)	(100	)%	n/a		n/a
Real estate acquisition fees and expenses	—			229		(229		)	(100	)%	n/a		n/a
General and administrative expenses	763			586		177			30	%	n/a		n/a
Depreciation and amortization	3,540			445		3,095			696	%	3,098		(3		)
Interest expense	1,500			273		1,227			449	%	1,244		(17		)
Interest and other income	35			74		(39		)	(53	)%	—		(39		)
Loss from extinguishment of debt	(206		)	—		(206		)	(100	)%	—		(206		)

_____________________

⁽¹⁾Represents the dollar amount increase for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016 related to real estate investments acquired on or after January 1, 2016.

(2) Represents the dollar amount increase (decrease) for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016 with

respect to the real estate investment owned by us throughout both periods presented.

Rental income and tenant reimbursements increased from $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $8.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily as a result of the growth in our real estate portfolio. We expect rental income and tenant reimbursements to increase in future periods to the extent we make additional acquisitions of real estate investments.

Operating, maintenance, and management costs increased from $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily as a result of the growth in our real estate portfolio. We expect operating, maintenance, and management expenses to increase in future periods to the extent we make additional acquisitions of real estate investments.

Real estate taxes and insurance increased from $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily as a result of the growth in our real estate portfolio. We expect real estate taxes and insurance to increase in future periods to the extent we make additional acquisitions of real estate investments.

Asset management fees to affiliate increased from $59,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily as a result of the growth in our real estate portfolio. Our advisor agreed to waive $0.2 million of asset management fees for the second quarter of 2017. We amended our advisory agreement on August 9, 2017 to change how asset management fees are calculated. We expect asset management fees to increase in future periods as a result of this change and also to the extent we make additional real estate investments.

Real estate acquisition fees and expenses to affiliate and non-affiliates were $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we acquired one real estate property for $68.5 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we did not acquire any real estate properties. We amended our advisory agreement August 9, 2017 to eliminate the payment of an acquisition fee to our advisor. We do not expect to incur real estate acquisition fees to affiliates going forward. In addition, we adopted ASU No. 2017-01 for the reporting period beginning January 1, 2017.  As a result of the adoption of ASU No. 2017-01, our acquisitions of real estate properties beginning January 1, 2017 could qualify as asset acquisitions as opposed to business combinations.  Transaction costs associated with asset acquisitions are capitalized, while transaction costs associated with business combinations will continue to be expensed.

General and administrative expenses increased from $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. These general and administrative costs consisted primarily of portfolio legal fees, board of directors fees, external auditor fees and internal audit compensation. We expect general and administrative costs to increase in future periods to the extent we make additional acquisitions of real estate investments.

17

Depreciation and amortization increased from $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily as a result of the growth in our real estate portfolio. We expect depreciation and amortization to increase in future periods to the extent we make additional acquisitions of real estate investments.

Interest expense increased from $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Included in interest expense is the amortization of deferred financing costs of $30,971 and $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2017, respectively. The increase in interest expense is primarily due to increased borrowings in connection with the acquisition of real estate, resulting in an increase in the average loan balance. We expect interest expense to increase in the future as a result of anticipated borrowings in future periods to the extent we make additional acquisitions of real estate investments.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we recognized a loss from extinguishment of debt of $0.2 million related to the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs as a result of the pay-off of the Von Karman Tech Center Mortgage Loan on May 9, 2017.

Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations

We believe that funds from operations (“FFO”) is a beneficial indicator of the performance of an equity REIT. We compute FFO in accordance with the current National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) definition. FFO represents net income, excluding gains and losses from sales of operating real estate assets (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar conditions based on historical cost accounting and useful-life estimates), impairment losses on real estate assets, depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We believe FFO facilitates comparisons of operating performance between periods and among other REITs. However, our computation of FFO may not be comparable to other REITs that do not define FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do. Our management believes that historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. As a result, we believe that the use of FFO, together with the required GAAP presentations, provides a more complete understanding of our performance relative to our competitors and provides a more informed and appropriate basis on which to make decisions involving operating, financing, and investing activities.

Changes in accounting rules have resulted in a substantial increase in the number of non-operating and non-cash items included in the calculation of FFO. As a result, our management also uses MFFO as an indicator of our ongoing performance as well as our dividend sustainability. MFFO excludes from FFO: acquisition fees and expenses (to the extent that such fees and expenses have been recorded as operating expenses); adjustments related to contingent purchase price obligations; amounts relating to straight-line rents and amortization of above and below market intangible lease assets and liabilities; accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; amortization of closing costs relating to debt investments; impairments of real estate-related investments; mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; and gains or losses included in net income for the extinguishment or sale of debt or hedges. We compute MFFO in accordance with the definition of MFFO included in the practice guideline issued by the IPA in November 2010 as interpreted by management. Our computation of MFFO may not be comparable to other REITs that do not compute MFFO in accordance with the current IPA definition or that interpret the current IPA definition differently than we do.

We believe that MFFO is helpful as a measure of ongoing operating performance because it excludes costs that management considers more reflective of investing activities and other non-operating items included in FFO.  Management believes that, by excluding acquisition costs (to the extent such costs have been recorded as operating expenses) as well as non-cash items such as straight line rental revenue, MFFO provides investors with supplemental performance information that is consistent with the performance indicators and analysis used by management, in addition to net income and cash flows from operating activities as defined by GAAP, to evaluate the sustainability of our operating performance.  MFFO provides comparability in evaluating the operating performance of our portfolio with other non-traded REITs which typically have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies.  MFFO, or an equivalent measure, is routinely reported by non-traded REITs, and we believe often used by analysts and investors for comparison purposes.

18

FFO and MFFO are non-GAAP financial measures and do not represent net income as defined by GAAP. Net income as defined by GAAP is the most relevant measure in determining our operating performance because FFO and MFFO include adjustments that investors may deem subjective, such as adding back expenses such as depreciation and amortization and the other items described above. Accordingly, FFO and MFFO should not be considered as alternatives to net income as an indicator of our current and historical operating performance. In addition, FFO and MFFO do not represent cash flows from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered an indication of our liquidity. We believe FFO and MFFO, in addition to net income and cash flows from operating activities as defined by GAAP, are meaningful supplemental performance measures.

Although MFFO includes other adjustments, the exclusion of adjustments for straight-line rent, the amortization of above- and below-market leases, loss from extinguishment of debt and acquisition fees and expenses are the most significant adjustments for the periods presented.  We have excluded these items based on the following economic considerations:

• Adjustments for straight-line rent. These are adjustments to rental revenue as required by GAAP to recognize contractual lease payments on a straight-line basis over the life of the respective lease.  We have excluded these adjustments in our calculation of MFFO to more appropriately reflect the current economic impact of our in-place leases, while also providing investors with a useful supplemental metric that addresses core operating performance by removing rent we expect to receive in a future period or rent that was received in a prior period;

• Amortization of above- and below-market leases.  Similar to depreciation and amortization of real estate assets and lease related costs that are excluded from FFO, GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of intangible lease assets and liabilities diminishes predictably over time and requires that these charges be recognized currently in revenue.  Since market lease rates in the aggregate have historically risen or fallen with local market conditions, management believes that by excluding these charges, MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the realized economics of the real estate;

• Loss from extinguishment of debt.  A loss from extinguishment of debt represents the difference between the carrying value of any consideration transferred to the lender in return for the extinguishment of a debt and the net carrying value of the debt at the time of settlement.  We have excluded the loss from extinguishment of debt in our calculation of MFFO because these losses do not impact the current operating performance of our investments and do not provide an indication of future operating performance; and

• Acquisition fees and expenses. Prior to our early adoption of ASU No. 2017-01 on January 1, 2017, acquisition fees and expenses related to the acquisition of real estate were expensed. Although these amounts reduce net income, we exclude them from MFFO to more appropriately present the ongoing operating performance of our real estate investments on a comparative basis. Additionally, acquisition fees and expenses have been funded from the proceeds from our private and public offerings, net proceeds from our distribution reinvestment plan, and from debt financings, and not from our operations. We believe this exclusion is useful to investors as it allows investors to more accurately evaluate the sustainability of our operating performance.

Our calculation of FFO, which we believe is consistent with the calculation of FFO as defined by NAREIT, is presented in the following table, along with our calculation of MFFO, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively (in thousands). No conclusions or comparisons should be made from the presentation of these periods.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Net loss	$	(424	)	$	(1,907	)	$	(621	)	$	(2,162	)
Depreciation of real estate assets	626			49			1,247			97
Amortization of lease-related costs	1,196			169			2,293			348
FFO	1,398			(1,689		)	2,919			(1,717		)
Straight-line rent and amortization of above- and below-market leases	(544		)	(68		)	(1,074		)	(130		)
Loss from extinguishment of debt	206			—			206			—
Real estate acquisition fees to affiliate	—			1,383			—			1,383
Real estate acquisition fees and expenses	—			229			—			229
MFFO	$	1,060		$	(145	)	$	2,051		$	(235	)

FFO and MFFO may also be used to fund all or a portion of certain capitalizable items that are excluded from FFO and MFFO, such as tenant improvements, building improvements and deferred leasing costs.

19

Organization and Offering Costs

Offering costs include all expenses incurred in connection with the private offering and this public offering. Organization costs include all expenses incurred in connection with our formation, including but not limited to legal fees and other costs to incorporate.

With respect to this public offering, our advisor and dealer manager generally paid our organization and offering expenses incurred in the primary portion of this initial public offering (other than selling commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees) directly and we reimbursed our advisor and the dealer manager for the commercially reasonable organization and other offering expenses they incurred on our behalf in connection with the primary portion of this initial public offering subject to the following limitations.

No reimbursements made by is to our advisor or the dealer manager may cause total organization and offering expenses incurred by us (including selling commissions, dealer manager fees, the stockholder servicing fee and all other items of organization and offering expenses) to exceed 15% of the aggregate gross proceeds from this initial public offering as of the date of reimbursement.

We will reimburse our advisor, the dealer manager and their affiliates for up to 1.0% of gross proceeds raised in the primary portion of this initial public offering. Our advisor, the dealer manager, and their affiliates will be responsible for all organization and other offering expenses (which excludes selling commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees) related to the primary portion of this initial public offering to the extent they exceed 1.0% of gross proceeds raised in the primary portion of this initial public offering. We do not reimburse the dealer manager for wholesaling compensation expenses.

During the private offering, there was no limit on the amount of organization and offering costs we could incur and we were obligated to reimburse our advisor, our dealer manager or their affiliates, as applicable, for organization and offering costs (excluding wholesaling compensation expenses) paid by them on behalf of us. As of June 30, 2017, we had recorded $1.5 million of offering costs (other than selling commissions and dealer manager fees) related to our private offering, all of which have been reimbursed to our advisor or its affiliates as of June 30, 2017.

Through June 30, 2017, our advisor and its affiliates had incurred organization and other offering costs (which exclude selling commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees) on our behalf in connection with this initial public offering of approximately $4.6 million. As of June 30, 2017, we had recorded $39,208 of organization and other offering expenses related to this initial public offering, which amounts represent our maximum liability for organization and other offering costs as of June 30, 2017 based on the limitations described above.

Distributions

During our offering stage, when we may raise capital more quickly than we acquire income producing assets, and from time to time during our operational stage, we may not pay distributions solely from our cash flows from operations, in which case distributions may be paid in whole or in part from debt financing, including advances from our advisor, if necessary. Distributions declared, distributions paid and cash flows from operations were as follows for the first and second quarters of 2017 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Cash Distributions Declared (1)		Cash Distribution Declared Per Class A Share (1) (2)		Cash Distribution Declared Per Class T Share (1) (2)		Cash Distributions Paid (3)						Cash Flows from Operations		Source of Cash Distributions Paid
Period							Cash		Reinvested		Total				Amount Paid from Cash Flows From Operating Activities/Percentage of Distributions Paid			Amount Paid from Borrowings/Percentage of Distributions Paid
First Quarter 2017	$	1,115	$	0.123	$	0.099	$	516	$	588	$	1,104	$	83	$	83	/8%	$	1,021	/92%
Second Quarter 2017	1,154		0.125		0.100		549		611		1,160		1,521		$	1,160	/100%	$	—	/0%
	$	2,269	$	0.248	$	0.199	$	1,065	$	1,199	$	2,264	$	1,604	$	1,243		$	1,021

_____________________

⁽¹⁾ Distributions for the periods from January 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017 were based on daily record dates and were calculated based on stockholders of record each day during this period at a rate of (i) $0.00136986 per share per day, less (ii) the applicable daily class-specific stockholder servicing fees accrued for and allocable to any class of common stock, divided by the number of shares of common stock of such class outstanding as of the close of business on each respective record date.

⁽²⁾ Assumes Class A and Class T shares were issued and outstanding each day that was a record date for distributions during the period presented.

⁽³⁾ Distributions are paid on a monthly basis. In general, distributions for all record dates of a given month are paid on or about the first business day of the following month.

20

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, we paid aggregate distributions of $2.3 million, including $1.1 million of distributions paid in cash and $1.2 million of distributions reinvested through our distribution reinvestment plan. Our net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $0.6 million.FFO for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $2.9 million and cash flows from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $1.6 million. See the reconciliation of FFO to net loss above. We funded our total distributions paid, which includes net cash distributions and distributions reinvested by stockholders, with $1.3 million of cash flows from operations and $1.0 million of debt financing.

From inception through June 30, 2017, we paid cumulative distributions of $5.8 million and our cumulative net loss during the same period was $5.5 million. To the extent that we pay distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operating activities, we will have less funds available for the acquisition of real estate investments, the overall return to our stockholders may be reduced and subsequent investors will experience dilution.

In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2017, our board of directors declared stock dividends for each month based on a single record date at the end of each month in an amount that would equal a 1% annualized stock dividend per share of common stock if paid each month for a year. Stock dividends are issued in the same class of shares as the shares for which such stockholder received the stock dividend.

Going forward we expect our board of directors to continue to authorize and declare cash distributions based on daily record dates and to pay these distributions on a monthly basis. Cash distributions will be determined by our board of directors based on our financial condition and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant. Our board of directors has not pre-established a percentage rate of return for cash distributions to stockholders. We have not established a minimum distribution level, and our charter does not require that we make distributions to our stockholders.

Over the long-term, we expect that a greater percentage of our distributions will be paid from cash flow from operations and FFO (except with respect to distributions related to sales of our assets and distributions related to the repayment of principal under real estate-related investments). Our operating performance cannot be accurately predicted and may deteriorate in the future due to numerous factors, including those discussed under “Forward - Looking Statements,” “Market Outlook - Real Estate and Real Estate Finance Markets,” “Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “Results of Operations” herein and the risks discussed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC. Those factors include: our ability to raise capital to make additional investments; the future operating performance of our current and future real estate investments in the existing real estate and financial environment; our advisor’s ability to identify additional real estate investments that are suitable to execute our investment objectives; the success and economic viability of our tenants; to the extent we make investments in real estate loans, the ability of our borrowers and their sponsors to make their debt service payments and/or to repay their loans upon maturity; our ability to refinance existing indebtedness at comparable terms; changes in interest rates on any variable rate debt obligations we incur; and the level of participation in our distribution reinvestment plan. In the event our FFO and/or cash flow from operations decrease in the future, the level of our distributions may also decrease. In addition, future distributions declared and paid may exceed FFO and/or cash flow from operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated interim financial statements and condensed notes thereto have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the SEC. The preparation of our financial statements requires significant management judgments, assumptions and estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. With different estimates or assumptions, materially different amounts could be reported in our financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. A discussion of the accounting policies that management considers critical in that they involve significant management judgments, assumptions and estimates is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the SEC. There have been no significant changes to our policies during 2017.

21

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016	F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	F-3
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Year Ended December 31, 2016 and the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 (unaudited)	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	F-5
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2017 (unaudited)	F-6

F-1

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
	(unaudited)
Assets
Real estate:
Land	$	22,909		$	22,909
Building and improvements	106,561			105,435
Tenant origination and absorption costs	13,408			13,528
Total real estate, cost	142,878			141,872
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	(6,645		)	(3,292		)
Total real estate, net	136,233			138,580
Cash and cash equivalents	8,803			15,666
Rent and other receivables	1,329			956
Above-market leases, net	195			210
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net	528			501
Total assets	$	147,088		$	155,913
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Notes payable, net	$	72,372		$	81,375
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	2,343			2,023
Due to affiliates	1,402			1,434
Distributions payable	382			377
Below-market leases, net	4,255			5,029
Other liabilities	1,262			1,254
Total liabilities	82,016			91,492
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Redeemable common stock	2,926			1,791
Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding	—			—
Class A common stock, $.01 par value per share; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 9,079,039 and 8,846,164 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively	91			88
Class T common stock, $.01 par value per share; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 274,871 shares and 94,018 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively	3			1
Additional paid-in capital	74,869			71,992
Cumulative distributions and net losses	(12,817		)	(9,451		)
Total stockholders’ equity	62,146			62,630
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	147,088		$	155,913

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Revenues:
Rental income	$	3,290		$	589		$	6,526		$	1,157
Tenant reimbursements	877			51			1,656			79
Other operating income	20			—			38			—
Total revenues	4,187			640			8,220			1,236
Expenses:
Operating, maintenance, and management	878			186			1,623			337
Property management fees and expenses to affiliate	31			10			60			17
Real estate taxes and insurance	513			74			970			143
Asset management fees to affiliate	—			39			214			59
Real estate acquisition fees to affiliate	—			1,383			—			1,383
Real estate acquisition fees and expenses	—			229			—			229
General and administrative expenses	422			367			763			586
Depreciation and amortization	1,822			218			3,540			445
Interest expense	757			95			1,500			273
Total expenses	4,423			2,601			8,670			3,472
Other income (loss):
Interest and other income	18			54			35			74
Loss from extinguishment of debt	(206		)	—			(206		)	—
Total other (loss) income	(188		)	54			(171		)	74
Net loss	$	(424	)	$	(1,907	)	$	(621	)	$	(2,162	)
Class A Common Stock:
Net loss	$	(406	)	$	(1,906	)	$	(596	)	$	(2,161	)
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.36	)
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding basic and diluted	9,068,437			8,168,760			9,013,145			5,931,364
Class T Common Stock:
Net loss	$	(18	)	$	(1	)	$	(25	)	$	(1	)
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.36	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.61	)
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding basic and diluted	261,382			1,543			213,814			1,543

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 and the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 (unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

	Common Stock							Additional Paid-in Capital			Cumulative Distributions and Net Losses			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Class A				Class T
	Shares		Amounts		Shares	Amounts
Balance, December 31, 2015	2,216,821		$	22	—	$	—	$	17,079		$	(995	)	$	16,106
Net loss	—		—		—	—		—			(4,089		)	(4,089		)
Issuance of common stock	6,559,574		65		93,918	1		60,532			—			60,598
Transfers to redeemable common stock	—		—		—	—		(1,738		)	—			(1,738		)
Stock dividends issued	69,769		1		100	—		711			(712		)	—
Distributions declared	—		—		—	—		—			(3,655		)	(3,655		)
Commissions on stock sales, related dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees to affiliate	—		—		—	—		(4,200		)	—			(4,200		)
Other offering costs to affiliate	—		—		—	—		(392		)	—			(392		)
Balance, December 31, 2016	8,846,164		88		94,018	1		71,992			(9,451		)	62,630
Net loss	—		—		—	—		—			(621		)	(621		)
Issuance of common stock	195,615		2		179,869	2		3,717			—			3,721
Transfers to redeemable common stock	—		—		—	—		(1,135		)	—			(1,135		)
Redemptions of common stock	(7,602	)	—		—	—		(64		)	—			(64		)
Stock dividends issued	44,862		1		984	—		475			(476		)	—
Distributions declared	—		—		—	—		—			(2,269		)	(2,269		)
Commissions on stock sales, related dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees to affiliate	—		—		—	—		(102		)	—			(102		)
Other offering costs	—		—		—	—		(14		)	—			(14		)
Balance, June 30, 2017	9,079,039		$	91	274,871	$	3	$	74,869		$	(12,817	)	$	62,146

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(621	)	$	(2,162	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	3,540			445
Property damage loss	—			134
Deferred rents	(315		)	(120		)
Bad debt expense recovery	(13		)	—
Amortization of above and below-market leases	(759		)	(10		)
Amortization of deferred financing costs	253			31
Loss from extinguishment of debt	206			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Rents and other receivables	(90		)	71
Prepaid expenses and other assets	62			(93		)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(656		)	33
Due from affiliate	—			(4		)
Due to affiliates	(11		)	1,194
Other liabilities	8			493
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,604			12
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Acquisition of real estate	—			(68,432		)
Improvements to real estate	(310		)	(51		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(310		)	(68,483		)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from notes payable	1,950			41,026
Principal payments on notes payable	(11,260		)	(5,125		)
Payments of deferred financing costs	(103		)	(612		)
Cash distribution advance from affiliate	—			1,140
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	2,522			57,407
Payments to redeem common stock	(64		)	—
Payments of commissions on stock sales, related dealer manager fees to affiliate and other offering costs	(137		)	(5,208		)
Distributions paid to common stockholders	(1,065		)	(540		)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(8,157		)	88,088
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(6,863		)	19,617
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	15,666			12,893
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	8,803		$	32,510
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Interest paid	$	1,245		$	273
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:
Stock dividends issued	$	476		$	257
Increase in cash distributions payable	$	5		$	267
Dividends paid to common stockholders through common stock issuances pursuant to the distribution reinvestment plan	$	1,199		$	637
Liabilities assumed in connection with real estate acquisitions	$	—		$	114
Increase in accrued improvements to real estate	$	914		$	—
Write-off of deferred financing costs	$	(206	)	$	—

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

1. ORGANIZATION

KBS Growth & Income REIT, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed on January 12, 2015 as a Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2015. Substantially all of the Company’s business is conducted through KBS Growth & Income Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership formed on January 14, 2015. The Company is the sole general partner of, and owns a 0.1% partnership interest in, the Operating Partnership. KBS Growth & Income REIT Holdings LLC (“REIT Holdings”), a Delaware limited liability company formed on January 14, 2015, owns the remaining 99.9% partnership interest in the Operating Partnership and is the sole limited partner. The Company is the sole member and manager of REIT Holdings.

Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, the business of the Company is externally managed by KBS Capital Advisors LLC (the “Advisor”), an affiliate of the Company, pursuant to an advisory agreement between the Company and the Advisor initially entered into on June 11, 2015, and amended at various times thereafter (the “Advisory Agreement”). The Advisor conducts the Company’s operations and manages its portfolio of core real estate properties. On January 27, 2015, the Company issued 20,000 shares of its common stock to the Advisor at a purchase price of $10.00 per share. On June 11, 2015, these outstanding shares of common stock were designated Class A shares of common stock.

As of June 30, 2017, the Company had invested in three office properties. The Company intends to invest in a diverse portfolio of core real estate properties and real estate-related assets, including the acquisition of commercial properties and the acquisition and origination of real estate-related assets. The Company considers core properties to be existing properties with at least 80% occupancy. Based on the current market outlook, the Company expects its core focus in the U.S. office sector to reflect a value-creating core strategy, which is also known as a core-plus strategy. The real estate-related assets in which the Company may invest include mortgage, mezzanine, bridge and other loans, debt and derivative securities related to real estate assets, including mortgage-backed securities, and equity securities such as common stocks, preferred stocks and convertible preferred securities of other REITs and real estate companies.

The Company commenced a private placement offering exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), on June 11, 2015, pursuant to which the Company offered a maximum of $105,000,000 of shares of its Class A common stock for sale to certain accredited investors (the “Private Offering”), of which $5,000,000 of Class A shares were offered pursuant to the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan. The Company ceased offering shares in the primary portion of the Private Offering on April 27, 2016 and processed subscriptions for the primary Private Offering dated on or prior to April 27, 2016 through May 30, 2016. KBS Capital Markets Group LLC (the “Dealer Manager”), an affiliate of the Advisor, served as the dealer manager of the Private Offering pursuant to a dealer manager agreement dated June 11, 2015 (the “Private Offering Dealer Manager Agreement”). The Dealer Manager was responsible for marketing the Company’s shares in the Private Offering.

On February 4, 2015, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to register an initial public offering of its common stock to offer a maximum of $1,500,000,000 in shares of common stock for sale to the public in the primary offering, consisting of two classes of shares: Class A and Class T (the “Primary Offering”). The Company also registered a maximum of $800,000,000 in both classes of shares of its common stock pursuant to the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan (the “DRP Offering” and, together with the Primary Offering, the “Public Offering”). The SEC declared the Company’s registration statement effective on April 28, 2016 and the Company retained the Dealer Manager to serve as the dealer manager of the Public Offering pursuant to a dealer manager agreement dated April 28, 2016 (the “Public Offering Dealer Manager Agreement”). The Dealer Manager was responsible for marketing the Company’s shares in the Public Offering.

The Company terminated the Primary Offering effective June 30, 2017 and expects to launch a private offering solely to accredited investors pursuant to Rule 506(c) of Regulation D of the Securities Act in the third quarter of 2017. The Company can give no assurance regarding the success of such private offering.

F-6

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

The Company continues to offer shares of common stock pursuant to the DRP Offering. In some states, the Company will need to renew the registration statement annually or file a new registration statement to continue the DRP Offering. The Company may terminate the DRP Offering at any time.

The Company sold 8,548,972 shares of Class A common stock for gross offering proceeds of $76.8 million in the Private Offering, including 74,744 shares of Class A common stock under its distribution reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $0.7 million. The Company sold 358,017 and 273,787 shares of Class A and Class T common stock in the Primary Offering for aggregate gross offering proceeds of $6.3 million. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had sold 236,839 and 3,372 shares of Class A and Class T common stock in the DRP Offering for aggregate gross offering proceeds of $2.4 million. Also as of June 30, 2017, the Company had redeemed 7,602 Class A shares for $64,655.

Additionally, on August 11, 2015, two of the individuals who own and control the Company’s sponsor, Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. (who also acts as chief executive officer, the chairman of the board and a director of the Company) and Peter M. Bren (who also acts as president and director of the Company), purchased 21,181.2380 and 21,181.2390 shares of Class A common stock, respectively, each for an aggregate purchase price of $172,500 or $8.144 per share. The per share purchase price reflects an 8.5% discount to the $8.90 offering price in the Private Offering in effect on the date of their purchase because selling commissions and dealer manager fees were not paid in connection with the sales. Mr. Bren’s investment was made on behalf of and for the account of three of his children, and he has disclaimed beneficial ownership of the shares. The Company issued these shares in private transactions exempt from the registration requirements pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

As described above, the Company intends to use substantially all of the net proceeds from its private and public offerings to invest in a diverse portfolio of core real estate properties and real estate-related assets.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

There have been no significant changes to the Company’s accounting policies since it filed its audited financial statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. For further information about the Company’s accounting policies, refer to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2016 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and condensed notes thereto have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information as contained within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and the rules and regulations of the SEC, including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, the unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for audited financial statements.  In the opinion of management, the financial statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair and consistent presentation of the results for such periods.  Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, REIT Holdings, the Operating Partnership, and their direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. 

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

F-7

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

Segments

The Company had invested in three office properties as of June 30, 2017. Substantially all of the Company’s revenue and net loss is from real estate, and therefore, the Company currently operates in one reportable segment.

Per Share Data

Basic net income (loss) per share of common stock is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding during such period. Diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock equals basic net income (loss) per share of common stock as there were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For the purpose of determining the weighted average number of shares outstanding, stock dividends issued during the period presented and subsequent to June 30, 2017 but before the issuance of the consolidated financial statements are adjusted retroactively and treated as if they were issued and outstanding for all periods presented. 

The Company has declared and issued stock dividends on shares of the Company’s common stock during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 as follows:

Three Months Ended June 30,	Amount Declared per Share Outstanding (1)	Total Shares Issued
2016	0.00249316 shares	19,087
2017	0.00249999 shares	23,160

Six Months Ended June 30,	Amount Declared per Share Outstanding (1)	Total Shares Issued
2016	0.00495892 shares	26,061
2017	0.00499998 shares	45,846

_____________________

⁽¹⁾ Stock dividends have been declared on a monthly basis and the amount declared per share outstanding assumes each share was issued and outstanding each date that was a record date for stock dividends during the periods presented. Stock dividends are issued in the same class of shares as the shares for which such stockholder received the stock dividend.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, aggregate cash distributions declared per share of Class A common stock were $0.12465726 and $0.24794466, assuming the share was issued and outstanding each date that was a record date for distributions during the period. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, aggregate cash distributions declared per share of Class T common stock were $0.10005293 and $0.19885548, assuming the share was issued and outstanding each date that was a record date for distributions during the period. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, aggregate cash distributions declared per share of Class A common stock were $0.12465726 and $0.24794466, assuming the share was issued and outstanding each date that was a record date for distributions during the period. No shares of Class T common stock were outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. For each day that was a record date for distributions during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, distributions were calculated at a rate of (i) $0.00136986 per share per day, less (ii) the applicable daily class-specific stockholder servicing fees accrued for and allocable to any class of common stock, divided by the number of shares of common stock of such class outstanding as of the close of business on each respective record date. Each day during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and the periods from January 1, 2016 through February 28, 2016 and March 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 was a record date for distributions.

F-8

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260-10-45, Earnings Per Share, the Company uses the two-class method to calculate earnings per share. Basic earnings per share is calculated based on dividends declared (“distributed earnings”) and the rights of common shares and participating securities in any undistributed earnings, which represents net income remaining after deduction of dividends declared during the period. The undistributed earnings are allocated to all outstanding common shares based on the relative percentage of each class of shares to the total number of outstanding shares. The Company does not have any participating securities outstanding other than Class A Common Stock and Class T Common Stock during the periods presented.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Net loss	$	(424	)	$	(1,907	)	$	(621	)	$	(2,162	)
Less: Class A Common Stock cash distributions declared	1,128			1,005			2,226			1,445
Less: Class T Common Stock cash distributions declared	26			—			42			—
Undistributed net loss	$	(1,578	)	$	(2,912	)	$	(2,889	)	$	(3,607	)
Class A Common Stock:
Undistributed net loss	$	(1,534	)	$	(2,911	)	$	(2,822	)	$	(3,606	)
Class A Common Stock cash distributions declared	1,128			1,005			2,226			1,445
Net loss	$	(406	)	$	(1,906	)	$	(596	)	$	(2,161	)
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.36	)
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted	9,068,437			8,168,760			9,013,145			5,931,364
Class T Common Stock:
Undistributed net loss	$	(44	)	$	(1	)	$	(67	)	$	(1	)
Class T Common Stock cash distributions declared	26			—			42			—
Net loss	$	(18	)	$	(1	)	$	(25	)	$	(1	)
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.36	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.61	)
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted	261,382			1,543			213,814			1,543

Square Footage, Occupancy and Other Measures

 Any references to square footage, occupancy or annualized base rent are unaudited and outside the scope of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm’s review of the Company’s financial statements in accordance with the standards of the United States Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

F-9

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Update

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU No. 2014-09”). ASU No. 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize the revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services.  ASU No. 2014-09 supersedes the revenue requirements in Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification.  ASU No. 2014-09 does not apply to lease contracts within the scope of Leases (Topic 840). ASU No. 2014-09 was to be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, and is to be applied retrospectively, with early application not permitted.  In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU No. 2015-14”), which defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year. Early adoption is permitted but not before the original effective date. The primary source of revenue for the Company is generated through leasing arrangements, which are excluded from this standard. The Company’s revenues that may be impacted by this standard primarily include other operating income and other ancillary income earned at its properties. In 2016, other operating income and other ancillary income were approximately 2% of consolidated revenue. The Company continues to evaluate the impact that the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements. The Company expects to adopt the standard using the modified retrospective approach, which requires a cumulative effect adjustment as of the date of the adoption.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10), Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU No. 2016-01”).  The amendments in ASU No. 2016-01 address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments.  ASU No. 2016-01 primarily affects accounting for equity investments and financial liabilities where the fair value option has been elected.  ASU No. 2016-01 also requires entities to present financial assets and financial liabilities separately, grouped by measurement category and form of financial asset in the balance sheet or in the accompanying notes to the financial statements.  ASU No. 2016-01 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early application of certain provisions of the standard is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued.  The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2016-01 to have a significant impact on its financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU No. 2016-02”). The amendments in ASU No. 2016-02 change the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. ASU No. 2016-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 as of its issuance is permitted. The new leases standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new leases standard on its consolidated financial statements.

F-10

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses of Financial Instruments (“ASU No. 2016-13”).  ASU No. 2016-13 affects entities holding financial assets and net investments in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income.  The amendments in ASU No. 2016-13 require a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected.  The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset(s) to present the net carrying value at the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset.  ASU No. 2016-13 also amends the impairment model for available-for-sale securities.  An entity will recognize an allowance for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities as a contra-account to the amortized cost basis rather than as a direct reduction of the amortized cost basis of the investment, as is currently required.  ASU No. 2016-13 also requires new disclosures.  For financial assets measured at amortized cost, an entity will be required to disclose information about how it developed its allowance for credit losses, including changes in the factors that influenced management’s estimate of expected credit losses and the reasons for those changes.  For financing receivables and net investments in leases measured at amortized cost, an entity will be required to further disaggregate the information it currently discloses about the credit quality of these assets by year of the asset’s origination for as many as five annual periods. For available for sale securities, an entity will be required to provide a roll-forward of the allowance for credit losses and an aging analysis for securities that are past due.  ASU No. 2016-13 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company is still evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-13 on its financial statements, but does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2016-13 to have a material impact on its financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU No. 2016-15”).  ASU No. 2016-15 is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows.  The amendments in ASU No. 2016-15 provide guidance on eight specific cash flow issues, including the following that are or may be relevant to the Company: (a) Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs should be classified as cash outflows for financing activities; (b) Cash payments relating to contingent consideration made soon after an acquisition’s consummation date (i.e., approximately three months or less) should be classified as cash outflows for investing activities. Payments made thereafter should be classified as cash outflows for financing activities up to the amount of the original contingent consideration liability. Payments made in excess of the amount of the original contingent consideration liability should be classified as cash outflows for operating activities; (c) Cash payments received from the settlement of insurance claims should be classified on the basis of the nature of the loss (or each component loss, if an entity receives a lump-sum settlement);  (d) Relating to distributions received from equity method investments, ASU No. 2016-15 provides an accounting policy election for classifying distributions received from equity method investments. Such amounts can be classified using a (1) cumulative earnings approach, or (2) nature of distribution approach. Under the cumulative earnings approach, an investor would compare the distributions received to its cumulative equity method earnings since inception.  Any distributions received up to the amount of cumulative equity earnings would be considered a return on investment and classified in operating activities. Any excess distributions would be considered a return of investment and classified in investing activities. Alternatively, an investor can choose to classify the distributions based on the nature of activities of the investee that generated the distribution. If the necessary information is subsequently not available for an investee to determine the nature of the activities, the entity should use the cumulative earnings approach for that investee and report a change in accounting principle on a retrospective basis; (e) In the absence of specific guidance, an entity should classify each separately identifiable cash source and use on the basis of the nature of the underlying cash flows. For cash flows with aspects of more than one class that cannot be separated, the classification should be based on the activity that is likely to be the predominant source or use of cash flow.  ASU No. 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.  The Company is still evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-15 on its financial statements, but does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2016-15 to have a material impact on its financial statements.

F-11

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (“ASU No. 2016-18”). ASU No. 2016-18 requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents.  Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of period and end of period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows.  ASU No. 2016-18 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company elected to early adopt ASU No. 2016-18 for the reporting period ended December 31, 2016 and it was applied retrospectively. As a result of the adoption of ASU No. 2016-18, the Company will not present the changes within restricted cash in the consolidated statements of cash flows.  

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU No. 2017-01”) to add guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses.  ASU No. 2017-01 provides a screen to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities (collectively referred to as a “set”) is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business.  If the screen is not met, ASU No. 2017-01 (1) requires that to be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output and (2) removes the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements.  ASU No. 2017-01 provides a framework to assist entities in evaluating whether both an input and a substantive process are present. The framework includes two sets of criteria to consider that depend on whether a set has outputs.  Although outputs are not required for a set to be a business, outputs generally are a key element of a business; therefore, the FASB has developed more stringent criteria for sets without outputs.  ASU No. 2017-01 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted.  The amendments can be applied to transactions occurring before the guidance was issued (January 5, 2017) as long as the applicable financial statements have not been issued.  The Company elected to early adopt ASU No. 2017-01 for the reporting period beginning January 1, 2017.  As a result of the adoption of ASU No. 2017-01, the Company’s acquisitions of investment properties beginning January 1, 2017 could qualify as asset acquisitions (as opposed to business combinations).  Transaction costs associated with asset acquisitions are capitalized, while transaction costs associated with business combinations will continue to be expensed as incurred.

3. REAL ESTATE

As of June 30, 2017, the Company owned three office properties containing 528,504 rentable square feet, which were collectively 95% occupied. The following table provides summary information regarding the properties owned by the Company as of June 30, 2017 (in thousands):

Property	Date Acquired	City	State	Property Type	Total Real Estate at Cost		Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization			Total Real Estate, Net
Von Karman Tech Center	08/12/2015	Irvine	CA	Office	$	21,366	$	(1,633	)	$	19,733
Commonwealth Building	06/30/2016	Portland	OR	Office	74,905		(3,523		)	71,382
The Offices at Greenhouse	11/14/2016	Houston	TX	Office	46,607		(1,489		)	45,118
					$	142,878	$	(6,645	)	$	136,233

As of June 30, 2017, the following properties represented more than 10% of the Company’s total assets:

Property	Location	Rentable Square Feet	Total Real Estate, Net (in thousands)		Percentage of Total Assets		Annualized Base Rent (in thousands)(1)		Average Annualized Base Rent per sq. ft.		Occupancy
Von Karman Tech Center	Irvine, CA	101,161	$	19,733	13.4	%	$	2,277	$	22.51	100.0	%
Commonwealth Building	Portland, OR	224,122	71,382		48.5	%	5,186		25.23		91.7	%
The Offices at Greenhouse	Houston, TX	203,221	45,118		30.7	%	3,807		19.68		95.2	%

_____________________

⁽¹⁾ Annualized base rent represents annualized contractual base rental income as of June 30, 2017, adjusted to straight-line any contractual tenant concessions (including free rent), rent increases and rent decreases from the lease’s inception through the balance of the lease term.

F-12

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

Operating Leases

The Company’s real estate properties are leased to tenants under operating leases for which the terms and expirations vary. As of June 30, 2017, the leases had remaining terms, excluding options to extend, of up to 9.1 years with a weighted-average remaining term of 4.7 years. Some of the leases have provisions to extend the term of the leases, options for early termination for all or a part of the leased premises after paying a specified penalty, and other terms and conditions as negotiated. The Company retains substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the real estate assets leased to tenants. Generally, upon the execution of a lease, the Company requires a security deposit from the tenant in the form of a cash deposit and/or a letter of credit. The amount required as a security deposit varies depending upon the terms of the respective lease and the creditworthiness of the tenant, but generally is not a significant amount. Therefore, exposure to credit risk exists to the extent that a receivable from a tenant exceeds the amount of its security deposit. Security deposits received in cash related to tenant leases are included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and totaled $0.6 million and $0.6 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized deferred rent from tenants, net of lease incentive amortization, of $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the cumulative deferred rent balance was $1.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, and is included in rents and other receivables on the accompanying balance sheets. The cumulative deferred rent balance included $0.2 million and $0.2 million of unamortized lease incentives as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

As of June 30, 2017, the future minimum rental income from the Company’s properties under its non-cancelable operating leases was as follows (in thousands):

July 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017	$	5,249
2018	10,180
2019	9,746
2020	9,218
2021	7,833
Thereafter	15,427
	$	57,653

As of June 30, 2017, the Company had a concentration of credit risk related to AECOM, a tenant in The Offices at Greenhouse in the engineering industry, which represented 26% of the Company’s annualized base rent. The tenant individually occupied 140,922 rentable square feet or approximately 27% of the total rentable square feet of the Company’s real estate portfolio. Of the 140,922 rentable square feet, 5,195 rentable square feet expires on July 24, 2019, with two three-year extension options, and 135,727 rentable square feet expires on December 31, 2024, with two five-year extension options. As of June 30, 2017, the annualized base rent for this tenant was approximately $3.0 million or $21.39 per square foot. No other tenant represented more than 10% of the Company’s annualized base rent.

As of June 30, 2017, the Company’s real estate properties were leased to approximately 40 tenants over a diverse range of industries. The Company’s highest tenant industry concentration (greater than 10% of annualized base rent) was as follows:

Industry	Number of Tenants	Annualized Base Rent (1) (in thousands)		Percentage of Annualized Base Rent
Professional, scientific and technical	8	$	4,806	41.9	%
Information technology	3	1,320		11.5	%

_____________________

⁽¹⁾ Annualized base rent represents annualized contractual base rental income as of June 30, 2017, adjusted to straight-line any contractual tenant concessions (including free rent), rent increases and rent decreases from the lease’s inception through the balance of the lease term.

As of June 30, 2017, no other tenant industries accounted for more than 10% of annualized base rent. No material tenant credit issues have been identified at this time.

F-13

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

4. TENANT ORIGINATION AND ABSORPTION COSTS, ABOVE-MARKET LEASE ASSETS AND BELOW-MARKET LEASE LIABILITIES

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company’s tenant origination and absorption costs, above-market lease assets and below-market lease liabilities (excluding fully amortized assets and liabilities and accumulated amortization) were as follows (in thousands):

	Tenant Origination and Absorption Costs						Above-Market Lease Assets						Below-Market Lease Liabilities
	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Cost	$	13,408		$	13,528		$	213		$	214		$	(5,596	)	$	(5,727	)
Accumulated Amortization	(2,468		)	(1,253		)	(18		)	(4		)	1,341			698
Net Amount	$	10,940		$	12,275		$	195		$	210		$	(4,255	)	$	(5,029	)

Increases (decreases) in net income as a result of amortization of the Company’s tenant origination and absorption costs, above-market lease assets and below-market lease liabilities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands):

	Tenant Origination and Absorption Costs						Above-Market Lease Assets					Below-Market Lease Liabilities
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Three Months Ended June 30,					For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016		2017		2016
Amortization	$	(703	)	$	(91	)	$	(7	)	$	—	$	423	$	4

	Tenant Origination and Absorption Costs						Above-Market Lease Assets					Below-Market Lease Liabilities
	For the Six Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,					For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016		2017		2016
Amortization	$	(1,336	)	$	(187	)	$	(15	)	$	—	$	774	$	10

F-14

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

5. NOTES PAYABLE

As of June 30, 2017, the Company’s notes payable consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

	Book Value as of June 30, 2017			Book Value as of December 31, 2016			Contractual Interest Rate as of June 30, 2017 (1)	Effective Interest Rate at June 30, 2017 (1)	Payment Type	Maturity Date (2)
Von Karman Tech Center Mortgage Loan (3)	$	—		$	11,260		(3)	(3)	(3)	(3)
Commonwealth Building Mortgage Loan (4)	41,000			41,000			One-month LIBOR + 2.15%	3.21%	Interest Only	07/01/2021
Term Loan (5)	32,500			30,550			One-month LIBOR + 2.35%	3.41%	Interest Only	11/14/2019
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility (6)	—			—			(6)	(6)	(6)	01/08/2018
Notes payable principal outstanding	73,500			82,810
Deferred financing costs, net	(1,128		)	(1,435		)
Notes payable, net	$	72,372		$	81,375

_____________________

⁽¹⁾Contractual interest rate represents the interest rate in effect under the loan as of June 30, 2017. Effective interest rate is calculated as the actual interest rate in effect at June 30, 2017, using interest rate indices at June 30, 2017, where applicable.

⁽²⁾Represents the maturity date as of June 30, 2017; subject to certain conditions, the maturity dates of certain loans may be extended beyond the dates shown.

⁽³⁾ On May 9, 2017, the Company paid off the Von Karman Tech Center Mortgage Loan and Von Karman Tech Center was added to the Term Loan as a collateral property. See footnote (5) below.

⁽⁴⁾ As of June 30, 2017, $41.0 million of term debt was outstanding and $6.4 million remained available for future disbursements, subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the loan documents.

⁽⁵⁾ The face amount of the Term Loan is $65.0 million, of which $32.5 million is term commitment and $32.5 million is revolving commitment. As of June 30, 2017, the Term Loan was secured by The Offices at Greenhouse and Von Karman Tech Center. As of June 30, 2017, the outstanding balance under the Term Loan was $32.5 million of term commitment, which bears interest at a rate of 235 basis points over one-month LIBOR. Also, as of June 30, 2017, $13.0 million of the revolving commitment was immediately available and an additional $19.5 million of revolving commitment remained available for future disbursement, subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the loan documents.

⁽⁶⁾ The Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility bears interest at a floating rate of 275 basis points plus the greater of zero percent and one-month LIBOR.  Monthly payments are initially interest only. However, if the Company does not meet the equity raised requirement of $30.0 million or greater for the three-month period ending October 1, 2017, it will be required to pay the minimum principal amortization payments in four equal installments on or before October 6, 2017, November 8, 2017, December 8, 2017 and January 8, 2018. As of June 30, 2017, all of the $10.0 million Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility remained available for future disbursements, subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the loan documents.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company incurred $0.8 million and $1.5 million of interest expense, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company incurred $0.1 million and $0.3 million of interest expense, respectively. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $0.2 million and $0.2 million of interest expense were payable, respectively. Included in interest expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 was $0.1 million and $0.3 million of amortization of deferred financing costs, respectively. Included in interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 was $15,485 and $30,971 of amortization of deferred financing costs, respectively.

F-15

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

The following is a schedule of maturities, including principal amortization payments, for all notes payable outstanding as of June 30, 2017 (in thousands):

July 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017	$	—
2018	—
2019	32,500
2020	—
2021	41,000
Thereafter	—
	$	73,500

The Company’s notes payable contain financial debt covenants. As of June 30, 2017, the Company was in compliance with these debt covenants.

6. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

Under GAAP, the Company is required to measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. In addition, the Company is required to measure other non-financial and financial assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis (e.g., carrying value of impaired real estate loans receivable and long-lived assets). Fair value, as defined under GAAP, is the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The GAAP fair value framework uses a three-tiered approach. Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

• Level 1: unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities;

• Level 2: quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and

• Level 3: prices or valuation techniques where little or no market data is available that requires inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

The fair value for certain financial instruments is derived using a combination of market quotes, pricing models and other valuation techniques that involve significant management judgment. The price transparency of financial instruments is a key determinant of the degree of judgment involved in determining the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments. Financial instruments for which actively quoted prices or pricing parameters are available and for which markets contain orderly transactions will generally have a higher degree of price transparency than financial instruments for which markets are inactive or consist of non-orderly trades. The Company evaluates several factors when determining if a market is inactive or when market transactions are not orderly. The following is a summary of the methods and assumptions used by management in estimating the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate the fair value:

Cash and cash equivalents, rent and other receivables, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities: These balances approximate their fair values due to the short maturities of these items.

Notes payable: The fair value of the Company’s notes payable is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on management’s estimates of current market interest rates for instruments with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value ratio, type of collateral and other credit enhancements. Additionally, when determining the fair value of liabilities in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available, the Company measures fair value using (i) a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for similar liabilities when traded as assets or (ii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement, such as the income approach or the market approach. The Company classifies these inputs as Level 3 inputs.

F-16

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

The following were the face values, carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s notes payable as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, which carrying amounts generally do not approximate the fair values (in thousands):

	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
	Face Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Face Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Financial liabilities:
Notes payable	$	73,500	$	72,372	$	73,487	$	82,810	$	81,375	$	82,443

Disclosure of the fair values of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to the Company as of the period end and requires a significant amount of judgment. The actual value could be materially different from the Company’s estimate of value.

7. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Private Offering Dealer Manager Agreement and the Public Offering Dealer Manager Agreement, the Company is or was obligated to pay the Advisor and the Dealer Manager specified fees upon the provision of certain services related to the Private Offering and the Public Offering, the investment of funds in real estate and real estate-related investments, management of the Company’s investments and for other services (including, but not limited to, the disposition of investments). The Company was also obligated to reimburse the Advisor and Dealer Manager for certain organization and offering costs incurred by the Advisor and the Dealer Manager on behalf of the Company, and the Company is obligated to reimburse the Advisor for acquisition and origination expenses and certain operating expenses incurred on behalf of the Company or incurred in connection with providing services to the Company. In addition, the Advisor is entitled to certain other fees, including an incentive fee upon achieving certain performance goals, as detailed in the Advisory Agreement.

In addition, in connection with certain property acquisitions, the Company, through indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, has entered into separate Property Management Agreements (defined below) with KBS Management Group, LLC, an affiliate of the Advisor (the “Co-Manager”).

The Company has also entered into a fee reimbursement agreement with the Dealer Manager pursuant to which the Company agreed to reimburse the Dealer Manager for certain fees and expenses it incurs for administering the Company’s participation in the DTCC Alternative Investment Product Platform with respect to certain accounts of the Company’s investors serviced through the platform.

The Advisor also serves as the advisor for KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (“KBS REIT I”), KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc., KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc., KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT, Inc., KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc. and KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc. The Dealer Manager also serves as the dealer manager for KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc., KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc., KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT, Inc., KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc. and KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

The Company, together with KBS REIT I, KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc., KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT, Inc., KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc., KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc., KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc., the Dealer Manager, the Advisor and other KBS affiliated entities, entered into an errors and omissions and directors and officers liability insurance program where the lower tiers of such insurance coverage are shared. The cost of these lower tiers is allocated by the Advisor and its insurance broker among each of the various entities covered by the program and is billed directly to each entity. The allocation of these shared coverage costs is proportionate to the pricing by the insurance marketplace for the first tiers of directors and officers liability coverage purchased individually by each REIT. The Advisor’s and the Dealer Manager’s portion of the shared lower tiers’ cost is proportionate to the respective entities’ prior cost for the errors and omissions insurance. In June 2017, the Company renewed its participation in the program, and the program is effective through June 30, 2018. As KBS REIT I is implementing its plan of liquidation, at renewal in June 2017, KBS REIT I elected to cease participation in the program and obtain separate insurance coverage.

F-17

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, no other business transactions occurred between the Company and KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc., KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc., KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT, Inc., KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc. and KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, summarized below are the related-party costs incurred by the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and any related amounts payable as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands).

	Incurred										Payable as of
	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016		2017			2016		June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Expensed
Asset management fees (1)	$	—		$	39	$	214		$	59	$	—	$	—
Reimbursement of operating expenses (2)	50			32		104			85		16		17
Property management fees (3)	31			10		60			17		6		16
Real estate acquisition fees	—			1,383		—			1,383		—		—
Other Arrangement
Advisor advance for cash distributions (4)	—			681		—			1,140		1,338		1,338
Additional Paid-in Capital
Selling commissions	17			1,153		78			2,986		—		—
Dealer manager fees	15			392		50			1,105		—		—
Stockholder servicing fees (5)	(77		)	—		(26		)	—		—		37
Reimbursable other offering costs (6)	(9		)	33		14			358		42		26
	$	27		$	3,723	$	494		$	7,133	$	1,402	$	1,434

_____________________

⁽¹⁾ During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company incurred $0.2 million of asset management fees, all of which were waived by the Advisor.

⁽²⁾ See “Reimbursable Operating Expenses” below.

⁽³⁾ See “Real Estate Property Co-Management Agreement” below.

⁽⁴⁾ See “Advance from the Advisor” below.

⁽⁵⁾ The Public Offering was terminated effective June 30, 2017. Pursuant to the terms of the Class T shares as set forth in the Articles Supplementary and Multiple Class Plan of the Company, the Company ceased accruing for stockholder servicing fees after June 30, 2017 and reversed the amounts previously accrued.

⁽⁶⁾ See “Organization and Offering Costs” below.

Reimbursable Operating Expenses

Reimbursable operating expenses primarily related to directors and officers liability insurance, legal fees, state and local taxes, accounting software and cybersecurity related expenses incurred by the Advisor under the Advisory Agreement. The Company has reimbursed the Advisor for the Company’s allocable portion of the salaries, benefits and overhead of internal audit department personnel providing services to the Company. These amounts totaled $49,399 and $101,741 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively and $34,731 and $37,278 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, and were the only type of employee costs reimbursed under the Advisory Agreement for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company will not reimburse for employee costs in connection with services for which the Advisor earns acquisition, origination or disposition fees (other than reimbursement of travel and communication expenses) or for the salaries or benefits the Advisor or its affiliates may pay to the Company’s executive officers. In addition to the amounts above, the Company reimburses the Advisor for certain of the Company’s direct costs incurred from third parties that were initially paid by the Advisor on behalf of the Company.

F-18

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

Commencing with the quarter ended December 31, 2016, the Advisor must reimburse the Company the amount by which the Company’s aggregate total operating expenses for the four fiscal quarters then ended exceed the greater of 2% of the Company’s average invested assets or 25% of the Company’s net income, unless the conflicts committee has determined that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. 

The Company’s conflicts committee determined that the relationship of the Company’s total operating expenses and its net assets was justified for each of the four fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2017 given the costs of operating a public company and the early stage of the Company’s operations and approved total operating expenses in excess of the operating expense reimbursement obligation in the second quarter of 2017.

Advance from the Advisor

The Advisor advanced funds to the Company, which are non-interest bearing, for distribution record dates through the period ended May 31, 2016. The Company is only obligated to repay the Advisor for its advance if and to the extent that:

(i) the Company’s modified funds from operations (“MFFO”), as such term is defined by the Investment Program Association and interpreted by the Company, for the immediately preceding month exceeds the amount of cash distributions declared for record dates of such prior month (an “MFFO Surplus”), and the Company will pay the Advisor the amount of the MFFO Surplus to reduce the principal amount outstanding under the advance, provided that such payments shall only be made if management in its sole discretion expects an MFFO Surplus to be recurring for at least the next two calendar quarters, determined on a quarterly basis; or

(ii) Excess proceeds from third-party financings are available (“Excess Proceeds”), provided that the amount of any such Excess Proceeds that may be used to repay the principal amount outstanding under the advance shall be determined by the conflicts committee in its sole discretion.

In determining whether Excess Proceeds are available to repay the advance, the Company’s conflicts committee will consider whether cash on hand could have been used to reduce the amount of third-party financing provided to us. If such cash could have been used instead of third-party financing, the third-party financing proceeds will be available to repay the advance.

Real Estate Property Co-Management Agreements

In connection with its property acquisitions, the Company, through separate, indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into separate property management agreements (each, a “Property Management Agreement”) with the Co-Manager for each of its properties. Under each Property Management Agreement, the Co-Manager will provide certain management services related to these properties in addition to those provided by the third-party property managers. In exchange for these services, the Company will pay the Co-Manager a monthly fee equal to a percentage of the rent, payable and actually collected for the month from each of the properties. Each Property Management Agreement has an initial term of one year and will be deemed renewed for successive one-year periods provided it is not terminated. Each party may terminate the Property Management Agreement without cause on 30 days’ written notice to the other party and may terminate each Property Management Agreement for cause on 5 days’ written notice to the other party upon the occurrence of certain events as detailed in each Property Management Agreement.

Property Name	Effective Date	Annual Fee Percentage
Von Karman Tech Center	07/31/2015	1.50%
Commonwealth Building	07/01/2016	1.25%
The Offices at Greenhouse	11/14/2016	0.25%

Organization and Offering Costs

Offering costs include all expenses incurred in connection with the Private Offering and the Public Offering. Organization costs include all expenses incurred in connection with the formation of the Company, including but not limited to legal fees and other costs to incorporate the Company.

F-19

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

With respect to the Public Offering, the Advisor and the Dealer Manager generally paid the organization and offering expenses of the Company incurred in the Primary Offering (other than selling commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees) directly and the Company reimbursed the Advisor and the Dealer Manager for the commercially reasonable organization and other offering expenses they incurred on behalf of the Company in connection with the Primary Offering subject to the following limitations.

No reimbursements made by the Company to the Advisor or the Dealer Manager may cause total organization and offering expenses incurred by the Company (including selling commissions, dealer manager fees, the stockholder servicing fee and all other items of organization and offering expenses) to exceed 15% of the aggregate gross proceeds from the Primary Offering and the DRP Offering as of the date of reimbursement.

The Company reimbursed the Advisor, the Dealer Manager and its affiliates for up to 1% of gross proceeds raised in the Primary Offering. The Advisor, the Dealer Manager and their affiliates are responsible for all organization and other offering expenses (which excludes selling commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees) paid related to the Primary Offering to the extent they exceeded 1% of gross proceeds raised in the Primary Offering. The Company did not reimburse the Dealer Manager for wholesaling compensation expenses.

During the Private Offering, there was no limit on the amount of organization and offering costs the Company could incur, and the Company was obligated to reimburse the Advisor and its affiliates for all organization and offering costs (excluding wholesaling compensation expenses) paid by them on behalf of the Company.

Through June 30, 2017, the Advisor and its affiliates had incurred organization and other offering costs (which exclude selling commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees) on the Company’s behalf in connection with the Public Offering of approximately $4.6 million. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had recorded $39,208 of organization and other offering expenses related to the Public Offering, which amounts represent the Company's maximum liability for organization and other offering costs as of June 30, 2017 based on the limitations described above. As June 30, 2017, the Company had recorded $1.5 million of organization and other offering costs related to the Private Offering. Organization costs were expensed as incurred and offering costs are deferred and charged to stockholders’ equity as such amounts were reimbursed to the Advisor, the Dealer Manager or their affiliates from the gross proceeds of the applicable offering.

8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Economic Dependency

The Company depends on the Advisor for certain services that are essential to the Company, including the identification, evaluation, negotiation, origination, acquisition and disposition of investments; management of the daily operations of the Company’s investment portfolio; and other general and administrative responsibilities. In the event that the Advisor is unable to provide such services, the Company will be required to obtain such services from other sources.

Legal Matters

From time to time, the Company may become party to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of its business. Management is not aware of any legal proceedings of which the outcome is probable or reasonably possible to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition, which would require accrual or disclosure of the contingency and possible range of loss. Additionally, the Company has not recorded any loss contingencies related to legal proceedings in which the potential loss is deemed to be remote.

Environmental

As an owner of real estate, the Company is subject to various environmental laws of federal, state and local governments. Although there can be no assurance, the Company is not aware of any environmental liability that could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. However, changes in applicable environmental laws and regulations, the uses and conditions of properties in the vicinity of the Company’s property, the activities of its tenants and other environmental conditions of which the Company is unaware with respect to the property could result in future environmental liabilities.

F-20

KBS GROWTH & INCOME REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

June 30, 2017

(unaudited)

9. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company evaluates subsequent events up until the date the consolidated financial statements are issued.

Cash Distributions Paid

On July 5, 2017, the Company paid cash distributions of $0.4 million and $9,073, which related to Class A and Class T cash distributions, respectively, declared for daily record dates for each day in the period from June 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017. On August 1, 2017, the Company paid cash distributions of $0.4 million and $11,709, which related to Class A and Class T cash distributions, respectively, declared for daily record dates for each day in the period from July 1, 2017 through July 31, 2017.

Stock Dividends Issued

On July 6, 2017, the Company issued 7,566 shares of Class A common stock and 229 shares of Class T common stock in connection with stock dividends declared for each share of common stock outstanding on June 30, 2017. On August 2, 2017, the Company issued 7,589 shares of Class A common stock and 230 shares of Class T common stock in connection with stock dividends declared for each share of common stock outstanding on July 31, 2017.

Distributions and Dividends Authorized

On July 7, 2017, the Company’s board of directors authorized cash distributions on the outstanding shares of all classes of the Company’s common stock based on daily record dates for the period from August 1, 2017 through August 31, 2017, which the Company expects to pay in September 2017. Investors may choose to receive cash distributions or purchase additional shares through the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan. Distributions for this period will be calculated based on stockholders of record each day during this period at a rate of $0.00136986 per share per day.

On August 9, 2017, the Company’s board of directors authorized cash distributions on the outstanding shares of all classes of the Company’s common stock based on daily record dates for the period from September 1, 2017 through September 30, 2017, which the Company expects to pay in October 2017, and the period from October 1, 2017 through October 31, 2017, which the Company expects to pay in November 2017. Investors may choose to receive cash distributions or purchase additional shares through the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan. Distributions for these periods will be calculated based on stockholders of record each day during these periods at a rate of $0.00131849 per share per day.

On July 7, 2017, the Company’s board of directors authorized stock dividends of 0.00083333 shares of common stock on each outstanding share of common stock to all stockholders of record as of the close of business on August 31, 2017, which the Company expects to issue in September 2017. Stock dividends are issued in the same class of shares as the shares for which such stockholder received the stock dividend.

Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement

On August 9, 2017, the Company entered an amended and restated advisory agreement with the Advisor. The material changes to the amended and restated advisory agreement are as follows: elimination of the payment of an acquisition fee to the Advisor; changes to the calculation of the Company’s asset management fee as described below; and undertaking that the Advisor will pay all organization and offering expenses related to the Company’s proposed private offering pursuant to Rule 506(c) of Regulation D under the Securities Act. As amended, the Company’s asset management fee will be a monthly fee equal to one-twelfth of 1.0% of the cost of the Company’s investments. The cost of the Company’s investments will include any portion of the investment that is debt financed and excludes any acquisition and origination fees paid to the Advisor.

Amended and Restated Distribution Reinvestment Plan

Also on August 9, 2017, the board of directors adopted an amended and restated distribution reinvestment plan to change the price at which shares are purchased pursuant to the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan and remove certain provisions that are no longer applicable. There were no other changes to the plan.

Effective August 20, 2017, pursuant to the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan, participants in the distribution reinvestment plan will acquire shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to the estimated NAV per share. As such, commencing on the next distribution reinvestment plan purchase date, which is September 1, 2017, participants will acquire shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to its distribution reinvestment plan at a price of $8.75 per share.

F-21

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION - The prospectus of KBS Growth & Income REIT, Inc. consists of this sticker, the prospectus dated April 28, 2017, supplemented by supplement no. 1 dated April 28, 2017, supplement no. 2 dated April 28, 2017, supplement no. 3 dated May 12, 2017, supplement no. 4 dated June 27, 2017, supplement no. 5 dated July 10, 2017, supplement no. 6 dated August 11, 2017 and any supplements filed subsequent thereto.

Supplement no. 1 includes:

• prior performance information through December 31, 2016.

Supplement no. 2 includes:

• the status of the offering;

• information with respect to our real estate investments;

• selected financial data;

• information regarding cash distributions and stock dividends for the year ended December 31, 2016;

• cash distributions and stock dividends subsequent to December 31, 2016;

• fees earned by and expenses reimbursable to our advisor, our dealer manager and the co-manager;

• our net tangible book value per share;

• information regarding stock ownership;

• information regarding our share redemption program;

• quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk; and

• information incorporated by reference.

Supplement no. 3 includes:

• the status of the offering;

• updated risks related to an investment in us;

• information regarding cash distributions and stock dividends;

• information regarding our indebtedness;

• information regarding our share redemption program;

• how we may effect a change to the offering price of shares in this offering;

• “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” similar to that filed in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2017; and

• our unaudited financial statements and the notes thereto as of and for the period ended March 31, 2017.

Supplement no. 4 includes:

• the termination of the primary portion of the offering; and

• our expected establishment of an estimated NAV per share and a payment by our advisor to our stockholders.

Supplement no. 5 includes:

• the authorization of cash distributions for August 2017 record dates and the authorization of a stock dividend for the month of August 2017.

Supplement no. 6 includes:

• the status of the offering;

• updated risks related to an investment in us;

• information regarding cash distributions and stock dividends;

• information regarding our indebtedness;

• our entry into an amended and restated advisory agreement;

• our estimated net asset value (“NAV”) per share;

• advisor payment to stockholders;

• information regarding our distribution reinvestment plan;

• information regarding our share redemption program;

• “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” similar to that filed in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2017; and

• our unaudited financial statements and the notes thereto as of and for the period ended June 30, 2017.