| 10.3 | we have relied on electronic searches of the publicly available records of ACRA, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Singapore and the State Courts of the Republic of Singapore, and the Insolvency Office of the Ministry of Law of the Republic of Singapore, and the records disclosed by such searches may not be complete or up-to-date. In particular, the ACRA Search is not capable of revealing whether or not a winding-up application has been presented, a winding-up order has been made, or a winding up resolution has been passed, or whether or not a receiver or judicial manager has been appointed. Notice of a winding-up order made or a resolution passed or a receiver or judicial manager appointed may not be filed at ACRA immediately. The Corporate Insolvency Search is not capable of revealing whether or not a winding-up petition has been presented. The Court Searches may not immediately reveal whether a winding up order has been made, a winding up resolution has been passed, or whether a receiver or judicial manager has been appointed. It should be noted that the search results may not necessarily be up-to-date and that the accuracy of the search results depend on the due lodgement, registration or filing of documents by the person obliged to lodge, register or file the same. Additionally, under the search function in eLitigation, searches have to be carried out by selecting group/case types which are categorised into eight modules (namely “Appeal Cases”, “Admiralty”, “Bankruptcy”, “Civil Cases”, “Enforcement”, “Insolvency (including Judicial Management)”, “Power of Attorney” and “Probate”). We understand that a maximum of 50 records can be handled per search request and as such, the searches may not be able to reveal all the cases to which the relevant entity is a party; |