Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies | Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies Description of the Company Presidio, Inc., a Delaware corporation, through its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”, “we” and “our”) is a leading provider of information technology (“IT”) solutions to its clients in North America. We enable business transformation through our expertise in IT solutions for agile, secure infrastructure solution sets, with a specific focus on Digital Infrastructure, Cloud and Security solutions. Our solutions are delivered through a broad suite of professional services, including strategy, consulting, design and implementation. We complement our professional services with project management, technology acquisition, managed services, maintenance and support to offer a full lifecycle model. Our services-led, lifecycle model leads to ongoing client engagement. The Company is headquartered in New York, New York and all of its direct and indirect subsidiaries are located in the United States. Public Offerings On March 15, 2019, the Company completed a secondary public offering of 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock by certain of its stockholders, including AP VIII Aegis Holdings, L.P. (“Aegis LP”), an affiliate of investment funds managed by affiliates of Apollo Global Management, LLC at a price to the public of $15.25 per share. The Company did not sell any shares and did not receive any proceeds from the offering. In conjunction with this secondary offering, the Company incurred $0.2 million of expenses, which is presented within transaction costs on the consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2019. On February 12, 2019, the Company completed a secondary public offering of 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock by Aegis LP at a price of $15.11 per share. The Company did not sell any shares and did not receive any proceeds from the offering. In conjunction with this secondary offering, the Company incurred $0.1 million of expenses, which is presented within transaction costs on the consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2019. As a result of the completion of this secondary offering, Aegis LP no longer controls a majority of our common stock and the Company therefore no longer qualifies as a “controlled company” within the meaning of the NASDAQ corporate governance requirements. The NASDAQ rules require that we appoint a majority of independent directors to our Board of Directors within one year of the completion of the secondary offering. As required by the NASDAQ rules, we appointed one independent member to each of our compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees prior to the completion of the secondary offering on February 12, 2019, and then reconstituted the committees on May 6, 2019 so that they are each comprised of a majority of independent members. The NASDAQ rules require that we appoint compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees composed entirely of independent directors within one year of the completion of the secondary offering. During these transition periods, we may elect not to comply with certain NASDAQ corporate governance requirements as permitted by the NASDAQ rules. On September 20, 2018, the Company completed a secondary public offering of 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock by Aegis LP at a price of $15.24 per share. The Company did not sell any shares and did not receive any proceeds from the offering. In conjunction with this secondary offering, the Company incurred $0.3 million of expenses, which is presented within transaction costs on the consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended March, 31 2019. Share Repurchase On September 6, 2018, the Company, entered into a stock repurchase agreement (the “Stock Repurchase Agreement”) with Aegis LP. Pursuant to the Stock Repurchase Agreement, the Company agreed to repurchase 10,750,000 shares of our common stock from Aegis LP for aggregate consideration of $158.6 million , representing a purchase price of $14.75 per share of common stock (the “Repurchase”). The Stock Repurchase Agreement, the Repurchase and the related transactions were approved by the Company’s Board of Directors and a committee of independent directors. On September 13, 2018, the Repurchase was completed using the net proceeds of $160 million of incremental term loans that were issued on terms substantially identical to the then existing term loans outstanding under our credit agreement (except with respect to issue price). Dividend On May 8, 2019, the Company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.04 per share of common stock. The dividend is payable on July 5, 2019 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on June 26, 2019. Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") rules and regulations for interim reporting periods. The consolidated financial statements do not include all disclosures normally made in annual financial statements. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included within the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 . All financial information presented in the financial statements and notes herein is presented in millions except for share and per-share information and percentages. In management’s opinion, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the periods shown have been made. All other adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the issue date of these consolidated financial statements. Revenue Recognition The Company’s revenue is generally derived from the sale of IT solutions to customers. The solutions we sell include products manufactured by third-parties including IT hardware equipment, software and support service contracts, as well as, services that are delivered directly by the Company or via third-party providers. The Company’s sales of IT solutions to customers are recognized in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which was adopted on July 1, 2018. Under ASC 606, the Company recognizes revenue when it has a contract with a customer and when, or as, it satisfies the performance obligations in the arrangement. Revenue for each performance obligation is recognized either at a point in time or over a period of time in a manner that depicts the transfer of control of the goods or services to the customer at an amount that reflects the consideration that the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services, net of sales taxes collected from customers, which are subsequently remitted to governmental entities. Such recognition requires the Company to use its judgment in accordance with ASC 606 and other applicable rules. The Company has a contract with a customer when there is an agreement that creates legally enforceable rights and obligations that includes: the approval of the parties to the contract, the identification of each party’s rights regarding the goods or services to be transferred, the establishment of payment terms for the goods or services to be transferred, the existence of commercial substance of the contract and the determination that it is probable that the Company will collect substantially all of the consideration to which it will be entitled in the arrangement. Generally, the Company determines it has a legally enforceable contract with the customer when it has a valid purchase order from the customer or it has a confirmatory customer approval of a quote, statement of work, or other binding agreement that individually, or in combination with other arrangements with the customer, satisfies the criteria above. As a provider of third-party products and services, the Company must assess whether it has promised to provide the customer the specific goods or services itself (as a principal) in which case revenue is recognized on a gross basis, or to arrange for those specified goods and services to be provided by another party (as an agent) in which revenue is recognized on a net basis. In applying the principal versus agent accounting guidance, the Company considers several factors and indicators including an assessment of the Company’s role in fulfilling the promise to provide the specific goods or services, the Company’s inventory risk before or after the goods and services are transferred to the customer and the Company’s discretion in establishing prices for the specified goods or services. The Company may be a principal in the fulfillment of some goods and services and an agent for other goods and services within the same contract. The Company’s solutions may consist of a combination of performance obligations including third-party products along with services delivered by the Company and/or third-parties. Contracts that contain multiple performance obligations may have revenue recognized at different times or over different periods of time as discussed in the policies below. For contracts that contain multiple performance obligations, the total transaction price of the contract is allocated to the separate performance obligations based on each performance obligation’s relative standalone selling price. To determine standalone selling prices of the Company’s performance obligations, the Company generally applies a cost-plus margin approach to determine a range of reasonable prices for each performance obligation. When a contract includes variable consideration such as usage-based or user-based fees, service level agreements, or volume-based pricing, the Company estimates the amount which the Company believes it will be entitled in exchange for transferring the promised goods or services to the customer. The Company uses either the expected value method or the most likely amount method to estimate variable consideration based on the facts and circumstances in each contract. The Company updates its estimates as facts and circumstances change throughout the contract. Revenue for each performance obligation is recognized as control of the performance obligation is transferred to the customer. For performance obligations satisfied at a point in time, the Company determines when control has been transferred based on an evaluation of the following indicators: the Company has a present right to payment, the customer has legal title, the Company has transferred physical possession, the customer has the significant risk and rewards of ownership and the customer has accepted the assets. For performance obligations satisfied over a period of time, the Company recognizes revenue using an appropriate method to estimate the progress toward complete satisfaction of the performance obligation. The Company generally does not provide customers with payment terms that would result in the existence of a significant financing component within the transaction price. Revenue for hardware and general software - Revenue from the sale of third-party hardware and general software products is recognized on a gross basis with the associated transaction price recorded as product revenue and the acquisition cost of the product recorded as cost of product revenue, net of vendor rebates. Hardware and general software can be delivered to customers in a variety of ways including drop-shipped by the vendor or supplier, or shipped through one of the Company’s staging warehouses or via electronic delivery for general software licenses. Regardless of the delivery method, revenue from the sale of hardware is recognized at a point in time based on the shipping terms specified in the contract which is when title and the risk of loss are passed to the customer. Our standard shipping terms are freight on board (“FOB”) origin and accordingly, we generally recognize revenue when product ships from our vendor or supplier. In transactions where the shipping terms are FOB destination, revenue is recognized when the promised hardware is delivered to the customer’s specified location. For general software that is pre-installed on hardware products, revenue is recognized at a point in time based on the shipping terms specified in the contract; while general software that is delivered to the customer via electronic download is recognized at a point in time when the information the customer needs to download and install the software has been provided to the customer. Revenue for software as a service (“SaaS”), enterprise license agreements (“ELAs”) or software sold with critical software assurance - In certain software arrangements, we recognize the related revenue on a net basis, with product revenue being equal to the gross margin on the transaction. Third-party software products that are recognized on a net basis include: SaaS to customers whereby the customer receives the right to access software directly from the vendor; ELAs that provide customers with access to manage their software license needs; and software that is accompanied by third-party delivered software assurance that is deemed to be critical or essential to the core functionality of the software license. As we are under no obligation to perform additional services, such as post-customer support or upgrades, revenue is recognized at a point in time as opposed to over the life of the software license. Revenue from these software products is recognized on a net basis at a point in time when the Company has satisfied its agency obligation which is generally when the Company has arranged for the delivery of the software from the third-party to the customer. Revenue for third-party support service contracts - Revenue from the sale of third-party support service contracts is recognized on a net basis, with product revenue being equal to the gross margin on the transaction. As we are under no obligation to perform additional services, revenue is recognized at a point in time as opposed to over the life of the third-party support agreement. Revenue is recognized at a point in time when the Company has satisfied its agency obligation which is generally when the Company has arranged for the support service contract on the customer’s behalf with the third-party. Revenue for professional services - Revenue from professional services is recognized over a period of time as the services are performed and recorded as service revenue with the associated cost recorded as service cost of revenue. For time and material contracts, where the Company has the right to invoice for work performed as completed, the Company recognizes revenue using the “right to invoice” practical expedient as the amount that can be invoiced directly corresponds with satisfaction of the performance obligation. For time and material contracts and fixed priced contracts where invoicing is linked to the achievement of milestones, the Company uses an input based percentage of completion method based on labor hours completed compared to the total estimated hours for the scope of work with revenue accrued or deferred as appropriate. Management bases its estimates on the scope of work being performed, our historical experience performing similar work and the risks and uncertainties surrounding that work. These estimates are adjusted throughout the performance of the contract as work is completed. Revenue for managed services - Revenue from managed services are recognized over a period of time using a time-lapsed method and recorded as service revenue with the associated cost recorded as service cost of revenue. The Company’s managed services are considered to be a series of distinct services due to the services performed being either repetitive on a recurring basis or for being a stand-ready obligation and accordingly are accounted for as a single performance obligation. Accordingly, the Company believes that using a time-based method for recognition is the most appropriate as the services are satisfied evenly over the stated period of performance. Sales returns and credit losses A customer’s ability to return goods and services is considered a form of variable consideration. The Company maintains an estimate for sales returns at the most likely amount based on historical experience. The Company also maintains an estimate for credit losses for uncollectible accounts which is based on historical experience. Warranties Our vendor partners provide warranties to our customers on equipment sold and, as such, we have not estimated a warranty reserve or deferred revenue for potential warranty work. These manufacturer warranties are assurance-type warranties that ensure that products will conform to manufacturer’s specifications and are not considered separate performance obligations. Extended warranties sold separately by manufacturers are considered to be separate performance obligations and are accounted for as third-party support service contracts described above. Contract assets and liabilities Revenue recognized in excess of the amount the Company has invoiced the customer is recorded as unbilled receivables or other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. Unbilled receivables are primarily comprised of professional services with milestone invoicing and contracts with bill in-full invoicing provisions. Payments received from customers in advance of transferring goods or services to customers is recorded as unearned revenue within accrued and other current liabilities or other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Unearned revenue is primarily comprised of payments for professional and managed services which are being provided over a period of time. Freight The Company considers freight billed to its customers as part of the transaction price in the arrangement which is allocated to the product performance obligations in the arrangement. Freight costs are recorded as a cost of product revenue. The Company does not consider shipping to be a separate performance obligation. Contract costs Generally, the only incremental costs of obtaining a contract that the Company incurs are sales commissions paid to our employees. The Company’s sales commission structures are complex and a majority of our sales commission are based on substantive operating metrics in addition to obtaining the contract. Sales commissions that are solely associated with obtaining a contract are capitalized when the amortization period would be one-year or greater; which primarily occurs in sales commissions paid on our managed services contracts. Capitalized sales commissions are amortized over the period they are expected to contribute directly or indirectly to future cash flows. Sales commissions paid on new managed services arrangements are amortized over a period that includes anticipated renewals while sales commissions paid on renewal services are amortized over the contract period. The Company may incur costs to fulfill a contract associated with our professional or managed services, including, but not limited to, turn-up services, purchasing support service contracts and software licenses. These costs are initially deferred as prepaid expenses or other assets and expensed over the period that services are being provided. Principles of Consolidation The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Presidio, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Use of Estimates The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates are used when accounting for items and matters including, but not limited to, revenue recognition, asset residual values, vendor rebates and consideration, goodwill, identifiable intangibles, measurement of income tax assets and liabilities and provisions for doubtful accounts, credit losses, inventory obsolescence, and other contingencies. Actual results could differ from management’s estimates. Other Comprehensive Income The Company did not have any components of other comprehensive income for any of the periods presented. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) , along with subsequent clarifying ASUs, which outline a single, comprehensive model for accounting for revenue from contracts with customers. Under the standard, revenue is to be recognized upon the transfer of promised goods or services to a customer, in an amount that reflects the consideration the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. See “Revenue Recognition” above for additional information regarding the Company's revenue recognition policies. On July 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606 utilizing the full retrospective method. The adoption of ASC 606 impacted the Company's results as follows (in millions, except per-share data): Three months ended March 31, 2018 Nine months ended March 31, 2018 As Reported ASU 2014-09 Adjustment As Adjusted As Reported ASU 2014-09 Adjustment As Adjusted Revenue Product $ 545.2 $ (16.4 ) $ 528.8 $ 1,714.1 $ (55.6 ) $ 1,658.5 Service 119.9 4.7 124.6 377.6 (2.2 ) 375.4 Total revenue 665.1 (11.7 ) 653.4 2,091.7 (57.8 ) 2,033.9 Cost of revenue Product 429.7 (16.4 ) 413.3 1,359.3 (55.6 ) 1,303.7 Service 96.0 4.5 100.5 299.2 (2.6 ) 296.6 Total cost of revenue 525.7 (11.9 ) 513.8 1,658.5 (58.2 ) 1,600.3 Gross margin $ 139.4 $ 0.2 $ 139.6 $ 433.2 $ 0.4 $ 433.6 Selling expenses $ 70.2 $ 0.3 $ 70.5 $ 201.0 $ — $ 201.0 Operating income $ 18.3 $ (0.1 ) $ 18.2 $ 85.8 $ 0.4 $ 86.2 Income tax benefit $ (5.6 ) $ — $ (5.6 ) $ (83.5 ) $ 0.2 $ (83.3 ) Net income $ 0.6 $ (0.1 ) $ 0.5 $ 119.5 $ 0.2 $ 119.7 Earnings per share: Basic $ 0.01 $ — $ 0.01 $ 1.30 $ 0.01 $ 1.31 Diluted $ 0.01 $ — $ 0.01 $ 1.24 $ — $ 1.24 As of June 30, 2018 As Reported ASU 2014-09 Adjustment As Adjusted Accounts receivable, net $ 613.3 $ (4.6 ) $ 608.7 Unbilled accounts receivable, net $ 156.7 $ 14.8 $ 171.5 Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ 80.7 $ 31.8 $ 112.5 Total assets $ 2,694.3 $ 42.0 $ 2,736.3 Accrued expenses and other current liabilities $ 193.2 $ 35.0 $ 228.2 Deferred income tax liabilities $ 177.7 $ 2.8 $ 180.5 Total liabilities $ 1,938.2 $ 37.8 $ 1,976.0 Retained earnings $ 110.9 $ 4.2 $ 115.1 Total stockholders’ equity $ 756.1 $ 4.2 $ 760.3 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 2,694.3 $ 42.0 $ 2,736.3 The adoption of ASC 606 impacted net income, as noted above, as well as elements of working capital. Total cash flows from operating activities, investing activities and financing activities remained unchanged for the nine months ended March 31, 2018 . Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted The Company is still evaluating the impact of the following additional accounting pronouncements not yet adopted as of March 31, 2019 . In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) , which changes the accounting for leases in order to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The standard has an effective date for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. ASC 842 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2019 and the Company is currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on the consolidated financial statements. The Company has formed an implementation committee to evaluate the impact of this standard, and the Company's analysis of the new standard will continue through the standard's effective date. The implementation committee is in the process of determining completeness of the Company’s lease portfolio and interpreting the policy elections provisioned by the standard. In addition, the Company is currently in the process of implementing appropriate changes to its business processes, systems and controls to support recognition and disclosure under the standard. The adoption of the standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s leasing business from a lessor perspective. Furthermore, we expect the adoption of the standard to impact the Company’s balance sheet through the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease obligation liabilities; with the vast majority of these balances related to operating leases for our offices and warehouses. The Company does not expect the standard to materially impact the consolidated statement of operations or the consolidated statement of cash flows. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) , which changes the current incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information. This standard requires a modified-retrospective adoption approach and has an effective date for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company does not believe this standard will have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) , which changes the accounting for derivatives and hedging to better align an entity's risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. The standard has an effective date for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe this standard will have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) |