| Document and Entity Information | 9 Months Ended |
| Oct. 31, 2015shares | |
| Document And Entity Information | |
| Entity Registrant Name | Pacificorp Holdings Ltd. |
| Entity Central Index Key | 1,632,053 |
| Document Type | 10-Q |
| Document Period End Date | Oct. 31, 2015 |
| Amendment Flag | false |
| Current Fiscal Year End Date | --01-31 |
| Is Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer? | No |
| Is Entity a Voluntary Filer? | No |
| Is Entity's Reporting Status Current? | Yes |
| Entity Filer Category | Smaller Reporting Company |
| Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | 8,390,000 |
| Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q3 |
| Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2,016 |
| Balance Sheets (Unaudited) - USD ($) | Oct. 31, 2015 | Jan. 31, 2015 |
| Current assets: | ||
| Cash | $ 4,978 | $ 27,546 |
| Prepaid Professional Fees | 750 | 7,500 |
| Total assets | 5,728 | 35,046 |
| Current Liabilities: | ||
| Loan from related Party | 28,062 | 26,721 |
| Total Liabilities | 28,062 | 26,721 |
| Stockholders' equity (deficit): | ||
| Common stock; authorized 100,000,000; 8,390,000 shares at $0.001 par issued and outstanding at July 31, 2015 and January 31, 2015 | 8,390 | 8,390 |
| Additional Paid in Capital | 21,510 | 21,510 |
| Deficit accumulated | (52,234) | (21,575) |
| Total stockholders' equity (deficit) | (22,334) | 8,325 |
| Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit | $ 5,728 | $ 35,046 |
| Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) - $ / shares | Oct. 31, 2015 | Jan. 31, 2015 |
| Statement of Financial Position [Abstract] | ||
| Common Stock, Par Value Per Share | $ .001 | $ .001 |
| Common Stock, Shares Authorized | 100,000,000 | 100,000,000 |
| Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | 8,390,000 | 8,390,000 |
| Statements of Operations (Unaudited) - USD ($) | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended |
| Oct. 31, 2015 | Oct. 31, 2015 | |
| Income Statement [Abstract] | ||
| REVENUES | ||
| OPERATING EXPENSES | ||
| General and administrative | $ 16,815 | $ 30,659 |
| Total Operating Expenses | 16,815 | 30,659 |
| Net loss for the period | $ (16,815) | $ (30,659) |
| Net loss per share: | ||
| Basic and diluted | $ 0 | $ 0 |
| Weighted average number of shares outstanding - Basic and diluted | 8,430,000 | 8,430,000 |
| Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - USD ($) | 1 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended |
| Oct. 31, 2014 | Oct. 31, 2015 | |
| Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | ||
| Net loss: | $ (1,074) | $ (30,659) |
| Changes in operating assets and Liabilities | ||
| Prepaid expenses | 6,750 | |
| Net cash used in operating activities | $ (1,074) | (23,909) |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | ||
| Loans from related party | 1,074 | 1,341 |
| Net cash provided by financing activities | $ 1,074 | 1,341 |
| Decrease in cash during the period | (22,568) | |
| Cash, beginning of period | 27,546 | |
| Cash, end of period | $ 4,978 | |
| SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||
| Cash paid during the period for interest | ||
| Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
| Note 1 - Organization and Basis of Presentation | 9 Months Ended |
| Oct. 31, 2015 | |
| Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | |
| Note 1 - Organization and Basis of Presentation | NOTE 1 -ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION Pacificorp Holdings, Ltd. (the "Company") was incorporated in the State of Nevada on October 6, 2014. The Company was organized to develop and explore mineral properties in the State of Nevada. These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and are expressed in United States (US) dollars. The Company has not produced any revenue from its principal business and is an exploration stage company. |
| Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies | 9 Months Ended |
| Oct. 31, 2015 | |
| Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
| Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies | NOTE 2 -SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company and the accompanying notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Condensed Financial Statements have been included. Such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and the accompanying notes, are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP") and do not contain certain information included in the Company's Annual Report on Form S-1 for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015. This interim Condensed Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with that Annual Report on S-1. Results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that might be expected for the entire fiscal year. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase that are readily convertible into cash to be cash equivalents. As of October 31, 2015 and January 31, 2015, there were no cash equivalents. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Impairment of Long Lived Assets The Company tests its assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount may not be recoverable, which includes comparing the carrying amount of a long-lived asset to the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. An impairment loss would be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. For the Company's mining claims, this test includes examining the discounted and undiscounted cash flows associated with value beyond proven and probable reserves, in determining whether the mining claim is impaired. The company recorded an impairment expense of $15,000 for the nine months ended October 31, 2015. Start-up Expenses The Company expenses costs associated with start-up activities as incurred. Accordingly, start-up costs associated with the Company's formation have been included in the Company's general and administrative expenses. Mining Interests and Exploration Expenditures Exploration costs are expensed in the period in which they occur. The Company capitalizes costs for acquiring and leasing mineral properties and expenses costs to maintain mineral rights as incurred. Should a property reach the production stage, these capitalized costs would be amortized using the units-of-production method on the basis of periodic estimates of ore reserves. Mineral interests are periodically assessed for impairment of value, and any subsequent losses are charged to operations at the time of impairment. If a property is abandoned or sold, its capitalized costs are charged to operations. Income Taxes The Company utilizes FASB ACS 740, “ Income Taxes The accounting guidance for uncertainties in income tax prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. The Company recognizes a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits and a consideration of the relevant taxing authority’s widely understood administrative practices and precedents. Interest and penalties on tax deficiencies recognized in accordance with ACS accounting standards are classified as income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740-10-50-19. We have implemented certain provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), which clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertain tax positions, as defined. ASC 740 seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspects of the recognition and measurement related to accounting for income taxes. We adopted the provisions of ASC 740 and have analyzed filing positions in United States jurisdictions where we are required to file income tax returns, as well as all open tax years in these jurisdictions. We have identified the United States as our "major" tax jurisdiction. Generally, we remain subject to United States examination of our income tax returns. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASC (Accounting Standards Codification) 820-10 (SFAS No. 157), “ Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures FASB ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. FASB ASC 820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available. The following summarizes the three levels of inputs required by the standard that the Company uses to measure fair value: Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the related assets or liabilities. Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share Net loss per share is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 260, Earnings Per Share Recent Accounting Pronouncements In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements. ASU 2014-10 eliminates the distinction of a development stage entity and certain related disclosure requirements, including the elimination of inception-to-date information on the statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders' equity. The amendments in ASU 2014-10 will be effective prospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those annual periods, however early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2014-10 during the years since January 31, 2014, thereby no longer presenting or disclosing any information required by Topic 915. In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date. The amendments in ASU 2013-04 provide guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this update is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in U.S. GAAP. The guidance requires an entity to measure those obligations as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. The guidance in this Update also requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as other information about those obligations. The amendment in this standard is effective retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. We are evaluating the effect, if any, adoption of ASU No. 2013-04 will have on our financial statements. In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-07, Presentation of Financial Statements (Top 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting. The objective of ASU No. 2013-07 is to clarify when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting and to provide principles for the measurement of assets and liabilities under the liquidation basis of accounting, as well as any required disclosures. The amendments in this standard is effective prospectively for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. We are evaluating the effect, if any, adoption of ASU No. 2013-07 will have on our financial statements. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Adopted In August 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 Presentation of Financial StatementsGoing Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entitys Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (ASU 2014-15). In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entitys management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued financial statements are available to be issued financial statements are issued financial statements are available to be issued probable When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entitys ability to continue as a going concern, management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of managements plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entitys ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of managements plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following (or refer to similar information disclosed elsewhere in the footnotes): a. Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of managements plans) b. Managements evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entitys ability to meet its obligations c. Managements plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entitys ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of managements plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there is substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern a. Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern b. Managements evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entitys ability to meet its obligations c. Managements plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date. The amendments in ASU 2013-04 provide guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this update is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in U.S. GAAP. The guidance requires an entity to measure those obligations as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. The guidance in this Update also requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as other information about those obligations. The amendment in this standard is effective retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-04 did not have a material impact on our financial statements. In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-07, Presentation of Financial Statements (Top 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting. The objective of ASU No. 2013-07 is to clarify when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting and to provide principles for the measurement of assets and liabilities under the liquidation basis of accounting, as well as any required disclosures. The amendments in this standard is effective prospectively for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013,and interim reporting periods therein. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-07 did not have a material impact on our financial statements. |
| Note 3 - Going Concern | 9 Months Ended |
| Oct. 31, 2015 | |
| Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | |
| Note 3 - Going Concern | NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN The Company has sustained operating losses since inception. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet its obligations and/or obtaining additional financing from its shareholders or other sources, as may be required. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern; however, the above condition raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to do so. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. Management is endeavoring to begin exploration activities however, may not be able to do so within the next fiscal year. Management is also seeking to raise additional working capital through various financing sources, including the sale of the Company’s equity securities, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If such financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue our business as desired and operating results will be adversely affected. In addition, any financing arrangement may have potentially adverse effects on us or our stockholders. Debt financing (if available and undertaken) will increase expenses, must be repaid regardless of operating results and may involve restrictions limiting our operating flexibility. If we issue equity securities to raise additional funds, the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders will be reduced and the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock. |
| Note 4 - Stock Subscriptions Received | 9 Months Ended |
| Oct. 31, 2015 | |
| Notes to Financial Statements | |
| Note 4 - Stock Subscriptions Received | NOTE 4 STOCK SUBSCRIPTIONS RECEIVED Between November 1, 2014 and January 31, 2015 the Company received $29,900 for common stock subscriptions. 6,000,000 of these shares were subscribed for by the officers and directors of the Company at $.001 per share. The remaining 2,390,000 shares were subscribed for by third parties at $.01 per share. At October 31, 2015, the Company has issued all shares related to these common stock subscriptions. |
| Note 5 - Loan from Related Party | 9 Months Ended |
| Oct. 31, 2015 | |
| Related Party Transactions [Abstract] | |
| Note 5 - Loan from Related Party | NOTE 5 LOAN FROM RELATED PARTY During the period from Inception to October 31, 2015 the Company received advances totaling $28,062 from a related party, the advance is unsecured, non-interest bearing and is due upon demand giving 30 days written notice to the borrower. |
| Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 9 Months Ended |
| Oct. 31, 2015 | |
| Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
| Basis of Presentation | Basis of Presentation The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company and the accompanying notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Condensed Financial Statements have been included. Such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and the accompanying notes, are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP") and do not contain certain information included in the Company's Annual Report on Form S-1 for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015. This interim Condensed Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with that Annual Report on S-1. Results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that might be expected for the entire fiscal year. |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents | Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase that are readily convertible into cash to be cash equivalents. As of October 31, 2015 and January 31, 2015, there were no cash equivalents. |
| Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
| Impairment of Long Lived Assets | Impairment of Long Lived Assets The Company tests its assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount may not be recoverable, which includes comparing the carrying amount of a long-lived asset to the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. An impairment loss would be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. For the Company's mining claims, this test includes examining the discounted and undiscounted cash flows associated with value beyond proven and probable reserves, in determining whether the mining claim is impaired. The company recorded an impairment expense of $15,000 for the nine months ended October 31, 2015. |
| Start-up Expenses | Start-up Expenses The Company expenses costs associated with start-up activities as incurred. Accordingly, start-up costs associated with the Company's formation have been included in the Company's general and administrative expenses. |
| Mining Interests and Exploration Expenditures | Mining Interests and Exploration Expenditures Exploration costs are expensed in the period in which they occur. The Company capitalizes costs for acquiring and leasing mineral properties and expenses costs to maintain mineral rights as incurred. Should a property reach the production stage, these capitalized costs would be amortized using the units-of-production method on the basis of periodic estimates of ore reserves. Mineral interests are periodically assessed for impairment of value, and any subsequent losses are charged to operations at the time of impairment. If a property is abandoned or sold, its capitalized costs are charged to operations. |
| Income Taxes | Income Taxes The Company utilizes FASB ACS 740, “ Income Taxes The accounting guidance for uncertainties in income tax prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. The Company recognizes a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits and a consideration of the relevant taxing authority’s widely understood administrative practices and precedents. Interest and penalties on tax deficiencies recognized in accordance with ACS accounting standards are classified as income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740-10-50-19. We have implemented certain provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), which clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertain tax positions, as defined. ASC 740 seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspects of the recognition and measurement related to accounting for income taxes. We adopted the provisions of ASC 740 and have analyzed filing positions in United States jurisdictions where we are required to file income tax returns, as well as all open tax years in these jurisdictions. We have identified the United States as our "major" tax jurisdiction. Generally, we remain subject to United States examination of our income tax returns. |
| Fair Value of Financial Instruments | Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASC (Accounting Standards Codification) 820-10 (SFAS No. 157), “ Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures FASB ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. FASB ASC 820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available. The following summarizes the three levels of inputs required by the standard that the Company uses to measure fair value: Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the related assets or liabilities. Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities |
| Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share | Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share Net loss per share is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 260, Earnings Per Share |
| Recent Accounting Pronouncements | Recent Accounting Pronouncements In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements. ASU 2014-10 eliminates the distinction of a development stage entity and certain related disclosure requirements, including the elimination of inception-to-date information on the statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders' equity. The amendments in ASU 2014-10 will be effective prospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those annual periods, however early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2014-10 during the years since January 31, 2014, thereby no longer presenting or disclosing any information required by Topic 915. In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date. The amendments in ASU 2013-04 provide guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this update is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in U.S. GAAP. The guidance requires an entity to measure those obligations as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. The guidance in this Update also requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as other information about those obligations. The amendment in this standard is effective retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. We are evaluating the effect, if any, adoption of ASU No. 2013-04 will have on our financial statements. In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-07, Presentation of Financial Statements (Top 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting. The objective of ASU No. 2013-07 is to clarify when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting and to provide principles for the measurement of assets and liabilities under the liquidation basis of accounting, as well as any required disclosures. The amendments in this standard is effective prospectively for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. We are evaluating the effect, if any, adoption of ASU No. 2013-07 will have on our financial statements. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Adopted In August 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 Presentation of Financial StatementsGoing Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entitys Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (ASU 2014-15). In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entitys management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued financial statements are available to be issued financial statements are issued financial statements are available to be issued probable When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entitys ability to continue as a going concern, management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of managements plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entitys ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of managements plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following (or refer to similar information disclosed elsewhere in the footnotes): a. Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of managements plans) b. Managements evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entitys ability to meet its obligations c. Managements plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entitys ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of managements plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there is substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern a. Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern b. Managements evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entitys ability to meet its obligations c. Managements plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date. The amendments in ASU 2013-04 provide guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this update is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in U.S. GAAP. The guidance requires an entity to measure those obligations as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. The guidance in this Update also requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as other information about those obligations. The amendment in this standard is effective retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-04 did not have a material impact on our financial statements. In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-07, Presentation of Financial Statements (Top 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting. The objective of ASU No. 2013-07 is to clarify when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting and to provide principles for the measurement of assets and liabilities under the liquidation basis of accounting, as well as any required disclosures. The amendments in this standard is effective prospectively for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013,and interim reporting periods therein. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-07 did not have a material impact on our financial statements. |
| Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies (Details Narrative) - USD ($) | 9 Months Ended | |
| Oct. 31, 2015 | Jan. 31, 2015 | |
| Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ||
| Cash equivalents | ||
| Potentially dilutive securities |
| Note 4 - Stock Subscriptions Received (Details Narrative) | 3 Months Ended |
| Jan. 31, 2015USD ($)$ / sharesshares | |
| Notes to Financial Statements | |
| Proceeds from stock subscriptions | $ | $ 29,900 |
| Shares subscribed by officers and directors | shares | 6,000,000 |
| Price per share | $ / shares | $ .001 |
| Shares subscribed by third parties | shares | 2,390,000 |
| Price per share, third parties | $ / shares | $ .01 |
| Note 5 - Loan from Related Party (Details Narrative) | 13 Months Ended |
| Oct. 31, 2015USD ($) | |
| Related Party Transactions [Abstract] | |
| Advances from related party | $ 28,062 |
| Terms of advances, related party | The advance is unsecured, non-interest bearing and is due upon demand giving 30 days written notice to the borrower. |
