| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 6 Months Ended |
| Jun. 30, 2016 |
| Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents | Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid
temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At June 30, 2016 and December
31, 2015, the Company had no cash equivalents. |
| Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates The preparation of the financial statements
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Estimates may include those pertaining to stock-based compensation and deferred tax assets. Actual results could materially
differ from those estimates. |
| Concentrations and Credit Risk | Concentrations and Credit Risk One customer provided 100% of revenues
during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015. |
| Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenue related
to its professional services to its customers when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred
or services have been rendered; (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company adopted the provisions of
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 740-10, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process
for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Management has evaluated and concluded
that there is material tax positions requiring recognition in the Companys financial statements as of June 30, 2016. The
Company does not expect any significant changes in its unrecognized tax benefits within twelve months of the reporting date. The Companys policy is to classify
assessments, if any, for tax related interest as interest expense and penalties as general and administrative expenses in the
statement of operations. |
| Investment - Related Party | Investment Related Party Investment related party is
recorded at fair value on June 30, 2016. The Company holds its investments as available for sale securities. |
| Principles of Consolidation | Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements
include the companys majority owned entities, both wholly owned corporate Subsidiaries (Balance Labs LLC., from
April 15, 2016 and Balance AgroTech Co., from January 11, 2016). All significant intercompany transactions are eliminated. |
| Net Loss Per Common Share | Net Loss Per Common Share Basic and diluted loss per common share
is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods. The effect of
2,320,000 and 320,000 warrants for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively was anti dilutive and not included
in dilutive loss per share. |
| Stock-Based Compensation | Stock-Based Compensation The Company measures the cost of services
received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award. For employees, the fair value of
the award is measured on the grant date and for non-employees, the fair value of the award is generally re-measured on vesting
dates and interim financial reporting dates until the service period is complete. The fair value amount is then recognized over
the period during which services are required to be provided in exchange for the award, usually the vesting period. Awards granted
to directors are treated on the same basis as awards granted to employees. The Company has computed the fair value
of warrants granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The expected term used for warrants is the contractual life.
Since the Companys stock has not been publicly traded for a sufficiently long period of time, the Company is utilizing
an expected volatility figure based on a review of the historical volatilities, over a period of time, equivalent to the expected
life of the instrument being valued, of similarly positioned public companies within its industry. The risk-free interest rate
was determined from the implied yields from U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bonds with a remaining term consistent with the expected
term of the instrument being valued. |
| Fair Value of Financial Instruments | Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company measures its financial assets
and liabilities in accordance with GAAP. For certain of our financial instruments, including cash, accounts payable, and the short-term
portion of long-term debt, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities. We adopted accounting guidance for financial
and non-financial assets and liabilities (ASC 820). The adoption did not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial
position or liquidity. This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures.
This standard does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that
require or permit fair value measurements. This guidance does not apply to measurements related to share-based payments. This guidance
discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future
income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The guidance
utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad
levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:
● Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
● Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
● Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore developed using estimates and assumptions developed by us, which reflect those that a market participant would use. The following table presents certain assets
of the Companys measured and recorded at fair value on the Companys balance sheet on a recurring basis and their
level within the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2016.
Total (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Fair-value equity securities $ 749,500 $ - $ - $ 749,500
Total Assets measured at fair value $ 749,500 $ - $ - $ 749,500 The following table presents certain assets
of the Companys measured and recorded at fair value on the Companys balance sheet on a recurring basis and their
level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2015.
Total (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Fair-value equity securities $ 500 $ - $ - $ 500
Total Assets measured at fair value $ 500 $ - $ - $ 500 The following is a reconciliation of
the level 3 Assets:
Beginning Balance as of January 1, 2016 $ 500
Unrealized gain on (level 3) June 30, 2016 749,500
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2016 $ 750,000 |
| Business Segments | Business Segments The Company operates in one segment
and therefore segment information is not presented. |
| Advertising, Marketing and Promotional Costs | Advertising, Marketing and Promotional
Cost Advertising, marketing and promotional
expenses are expensed as incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses on the accompanying statement
of operations. For the six month period ended June 30, 2016 and the six months ended June 30, 2015, advertising, marketing and
promotion expense was $1,171 in 2016 and $0 in 2015, respectively. |
| Reclassifications | Reclassifications Certain prior period amounts have been
reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the fiscal 2016 presentation. These reclassifications have no impact on the
previously reported net loss. |
| Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements | Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements The Company has evaluated all new accounting
standards that are in effect and may impact its condensed consolidated financial statements and does not believe that there are
any other new accounting standards that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results
of operations. In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases In
March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment
Accounting In
April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 201610 Revenue from Contract with Customers (Topic 606): identifying Performance Obligations
and Licensing .The amendments in this Update do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606. Rather, the
amendments in this Update clarify the following two aspects of Topic 606: identifying performance obligations and the licensing
implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. Topic 606 includes implementation guidance on
(a) contracts with customers to transfer goods and services in exchange for consideration and (b) determining whether an entitys
promise to grant a license provides a customer with either a right to use the entitys intellectual property (which is satisfied
at a point in time) or a right to access the entitys intellectual property (which is satisfied over time). The amendments
in this Update are intended render more detailed implementation guidance with the expectation to reduce the degree of judgement
necessary to comply with Topic 606. We are currently reviewing the provisions of this ASU to determine if there will be any impact
on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. |
