Industry Regulation | Note 5. Industry Regulation Electricity and Natural Gas Distribution – Maine and New York The Maine distribution rate stipulation, the Maine transmission Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Return on Equity (ROE) case, the New York rate plans, Reforming Energy Vision (REV), and the New York Transmission Company (New York Transco) filings are some of the most important specific regulatory processes that affect Networks. The revenues of Networks companies are essentially regulated, being based on tariffs established in accordance with administrative procedures set by the various regulatory bodies. The tariffs applied to regulated activities in the U.S. are approved by the regulatory commissions of the different states and are based on the cost of providing service. The revenues of each regulated utility are set to be sufficient to cover all its operating costs, including energy costs, finance costs, and the costs of equity, the last of which reflect our capital ratio and a reasonable ROE. Energy costs that are set on the New York and New England wholesale markets are passed on to consumers. The difference between energy costs that are budgeted and those that are actually incurred by the utilities is offset by applying compensation procedures that result in either immediate or deferred tariff adjustments. These procedures apply to other costs, which are in most cases exceptional, such as the effects of extreme weather conditions, environmental factors, regulatory and accounting changes, and treatment of vulnerable customers, that are offset in the tariff process. Any New York revenues that allow a utility to exceed target returns, usually the result of better than expected cost efficiency, are generally shared between the utility and its customers, resulting in future tariff reductions. Each of the four Networks’ New York and Maine supply companies must comply with regulatory procedures that differ in form but in all cases conform to the basic framework outlined above. Generally, tariff reviews cover various years and provide for a reasonable ROE, protection, and automatic adjustments for exceptional costs incurred and efficiency incentives. CMP Distribution Rate Stipulation and New Renewable Source Generation On May 1, 2013, CMP submitted its required distribution rate request with the Maine Public Utilities Commission (MPUC). On July 3, 2014, after a fourteen month review process, CMP filed a rate stipulation agreement on the majority of the financial matters with the MPUC. The stipulation agreement was approved by the MPUC on August 25, 2014. The stipulation agreement also noted that certain rate design matters would be litigated, which the MPUC ruled on October 14, 2014. The rate stipulation agreement provided for an annual CMP distribution tariff increase of 10.7% or $24.3 million. The rate increase was based on a 9.45% ROE and 50% equity capital. CMP was authorized to implement a Rate Decoupling Mechanism (RDM) which protects CMP from variations in sales due to energy efficiency and weather. CMP also adjusted its storm costs recovery mechanism whereby it is allowed to collect in rates a storm allowance and to defer actual storm costs when such storm event costs exceed $3.5 million. CMP and customers share storm costs that exceed a certain balance on a fifty-fifty basis, with CMP’s exposure limited to $3.0 million annually. CMP has made a separate regulatory filing for a new customer billing system replacement. In accordance with the stipulation agreement, a new billing system is needed and CMP made its filing on February 27, 2015 to request a separate rate recovery mechanism. On October 20, 2015, the MPUC issued an order approving a stipulation agreement authorizing CMP to proceed with the customer billing system investment. The approved stipulation allows CMP to recover the system costs effective with its implementation, currently expected in mid-2017. The rate stipulation does not have a predetermined rate term. CMP has the option to file for new distribution rates at its own discretion. The rate stipulation does not contain service quality targets or penalties. The rate stipulation also does not contain any earning sharing requirements. Under Maine law 35-A M.R.S.A §§ 3210-C, 3210-D, the MPUC is authorized to conduct periodic requests for proposals seeking long-term supplies of energy, capacity or Renewable Energy Certificates, or RECs, from qualifying resources. The MPUC is further authorized to order Maine Transmission and Distribution Utilities to enter into contracts with sellers selected from the MPUC’s competitive solicitation process. Pursuant to a MPUC Order dated October 8, 2009, CMP entered into a 20-year agreement with Evergreen Wind Power III, LLC, on March 31, 2010, to purchase capacity and energy from Evergreen’s 60 MW Rollins wind farm in Penobscot County, Maine. CMP’s purchase obligations under the Rollins contract are approximately $7 million per year. In accordance with subsequent MPUC orders, CMP periodically auctions the purchased Rollins energy to wholesale buyers in the New England regional market. Under applicable law, CMP is assured recovery of any differences between power purchase costs and achieved market revenues through a reconcilable component of its retail distribution rates. Although the MPUC has conducted multiple requests for proposals under M.R.S.A §3210-C and has tentatively accepted long-term proposals from other sellers, these selections have not yet resulted in additional currently effective contracts with CMP. Transmission - FERC ROE Proceeding See Note 13 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities for a further discussion. CMP’s and UI’s transmission rates are determined by a tariff regulated by the FERC and administered by ISO New England, Inc. (ISO-NE). Transmission rates are set annually pursuant to a FERC authorized formula that allows for recovery of direct and allocated transmission operating and maintenance expenses, and for a return of and on investment in assets. The FERC currently provides a base ROE of 10.57% and additional ROE incentive adders applicable to assets based upon vintage, voltage and other factors. On December 28, 2015, the FERC issued an order instituting section 206 proceedings and establishing hearing and settlement judge procedures. Pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), the FERC finds that ISO-NE Transmission, Markets, and Services Tariff is unjust, unreasonable, and unduly discriminatory or preferential. The FERC stated that ISO-NE’s Tariff lacks adequate transparency and challenge procedures with regard to the formula rates for ISO-NE Participating Transmission Owners, including UI. The FERC also found that the current Regional Network Service (RNS) and Local Network Service (LNS) formula rates appear to be unjust, unreasonable, unduly discriminatory or preferential or otherwise unlawful as the formula rates appear to lack sufficient detail in order to determine how certain costs are derived and recovered in the formula rates. A settlement judge has been appointed and a settlement conference has convened. We are unable to predict the outcome of this proceeding at this time. NYSEG and RGE Rate Plans On September 16, 2010, the New York Public Service Commission (NYPSC) approved a new rate plan for electric and natural gas service provided by NYSEG and RGE effective from August 26, 2010 through December 31, 2013. The rate plans contain continuation provisions beyond 2013 if NYSEG and RGE do not request new rates to go into effect and the current base rates will stay in place. The revenue requirements were based on a ten-percent allowed ROE applied to an equity ratio of forty-eight-percent. If annual earnings exceed the allowed return, a tiered Earnings Sharing Mechanism (ESM) will capture a portion of the excess for the ratepayers’ benefit. The ESM is subject to specified downward adjustments if NYSEG and RGE fail to meet certain reliability and customer service measures. Key components of the rate plan include electric reliability performance mechanisms, natural gas safety performance measures, customer service quality metrics and targets, and electric distribution vegetation management programs that establish threshold performance targets. There will be downward revenue adjustments if NYSEG and RGE fail to meet the targets. The 2010 rate plans established revenue decoupling mechanism (RDM), intended to remove company disincentives to promote increased energy efficiency. Under RDM, electric revenues are based on revenue per customer class rather than billed revenue, while natural gas revenues are based on revenue per customer. Any shortfalls or excesses between billed revenues and allowed revenues will be accrued for future recovery or refund. In August 2010, NYSEG began amortizing $15.2 million per year of its $303.9 million theoretical excess depreciation reserve. On September 1, 2012, RGE began amortizing $5.3 million per year of its $105 million theoretical excess depreciation reserve. Both amortization amounts reflect a twenty year amortization period. Theoretical excess depreciation is the difference between actual accumulated depreciation taken to date and a theoretical reserve. The actual accumulated depreciation is the result of depreciation rates allowed in prior rate orders based on estimates of useful lives and net salvage values as determined in those cases. The theoretical reserve is the amount that would have accumulated if the depreciation rates in the new rate plan had been in place for the entire useful lives of the affected assets. Differences between the actual reserve and the theoretical reserve are normal aspects of utility ratemaking. The usual treatment is to flow any excess or deficiency back as an adjustment to depreciation expense over the remaining life of the property. However, in accordance with the new rate plan, NYSEG and RGE will moderate electric rates by recording the theoretical reserve amortization as a debit to accumulated depreciation and a credit to other revenues, and normalize a portion of the amortization from a tax perspective. On May 20, 2015, NYSEG and RGE filed electric and gas rate cases with the NYPSC. The companies requested rate increases for NYSEG electric, NYSEG gas and RGE gas. RGE electric proposed a rate decrease. On February 19, 2016, NYSEG, RGE and other signatory parties filed a Joint Proposal (Proposal) with the NYPSC for a three-year rate plan for electric and gas service at NYSEG and RGE commencing May 1, 2016. The Proposal balances the varied interests of the signatory parties including but not limited to maintaining the companies’ credit quality and mitigating the rate impacts to customers. The Proposal reflects many customer attributes including: acceleration of the companies’ natural gas leak prone main replacement programs and enhanced electric vegetation management to provide continued safe and reliable service. The delivery rate increase in the Proposal can be summarized as follows: May 1, 2016 May 1, 2017 May 1, 2018 Rate Increase Delivery Rate Increase Rate Increase Delivery Rate Increase Rate Increase Delivery Rate Increase Utility (Millions) % (Millions) % (Millions) % NYSEG Electric $ 29.6 4.10 % $ 29.9 4.10 % $ 30.3 4.10 % NYSEG Gas 13.1 7.30 % 13.9 7.30 % 14.8 7.30 % RGE Electric 3.0 0.70 % 21.6 5.00 % 25.9 5.70 % RGE Gas 8.8 5.20 % 7.7 4.40 % 9.5 5.20 % The allowed rate of return on common equity for NYSEG Electric, NYSEG Gas, RGE Electric and RGE Gas is 9.00%. The equity ratio for each company is 48%. The Proposal includes an Earnings Sharing Mechanism (ESM) applicable to each company. The customer share of earnings would increase at higher earnings levels, with customers receiving 50%, 75% and 90% of earnings over 9.5%, 10.0% and 10.5% of ROE, respectively, in the first year. Earnings thresholds would increase in subsequent years. The Proposal reflects the recovery of deferred NYSEG Electric storm costs of approximately $262 million, of which $123 million will be amortized over ten years and the remaining $139 million will be amortized over five years. The Proposal also continues reserve accounting for qualifying Major Storms ($21.4 million annually for NYSEG Electric and $2.5 million annually for RGE Electric). Incremental maintenance costs incurred to restore service in qualifying divisions will be chargeable to the Major Storm Reserve provided they meet certain thresholds. The Proposal maintains NYSEG’s and RGE’s current electric reliability performance measures (and associated potential negative revenue adjustments for failing to meet established performance levels) which include the system average interruption frequency index and the customer average interruption duration index. The Proposal also modifies certain gas safety performance measures at the companies, including those relating to the replacement of leak prone main, leak backlog management, emergency response, and damage prevention. The Proposal establishes threshold performance levels for designated aspects of customer service quality and continues and expands NYSEG’s and RGE’s bill reduction and arrears forgiveness Low Income Programs at the increased funding levels included in the Proposal. The Proposal provides for the implementation of NYSEG’s Energy Smart Community (“ESC”) Project in the Ithaca region which will serve as a test-bed for implementation and deployment of Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) initiatives. The ESC Project will be supported by NYSEG’s planned rollout of Distribution Automation and Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) to customers on circuits in the Ithaca region. The Companies will also pursue Non-Wires Alternative projects as described in the Proposal. REV-related incremental costs and fees will be included in the Rate Adjustment Mechanism (RAM) to the extent cost recovery is not provided for elsewhere. Under the Proposal, each company will implement a RAM, which will be applicable to all customers, to return or collect RAM Eligible Deferrals and Costs, including: (1) property taxes; (2) Major Storm deferral balances; (3) gas leak prone pipe replacement; (4) REV costs and fees which are not covered by other recovery mechanisms; and (5) NYSEG Electric Pole Attachment revenues. The Proposal provides for partial or full reconciliation of certain expenses including, but not limited to: pensions, other postretirement benefits; property taxes; variable rate debt and new fixed rate debt; gas research and development; environmental remediation costs; Major Storms; nuclear electric insurance limited credits; economic development; and Low Income Programs. The Proposal also includes a downward-only Net Plant reconciliation. In addition, the Proposal includes downward-only reconciliations for the costs of: electric distribution and gas vegetation management; pipeline integrity; and incremental maintenance. The Proposal provides that NYSEG and RGE continue their electric RDMs on a total revenue per class basis and their gas RDMs on a revenue per customer basis. The Administrative Law Judges assigned to the New York rate case will issue a procedural schedule establishing the remaining procedure for review and decision on the Proposal. We expect hearings on the Proposal to be held in April 2016 and a NYPSC decision to be made in May 2016. Electric and Gas regulated utilities – Connecticut and Massachusetts The distribution rates and allowed ROEs for Networks’ regulated utilities in Connecticut and Massachusetts are subject to regulation by the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) and the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (DPU), respectively. Under Connecticut law, UI’s retail electricity customers are able to choose their electricity supplier while UI remains their electric distribution company. UI purchases power for those of its customers under standard service rates who do not choose a retail electric supplier and have a maximum demand of less than 500 kilowatts and its customers under supplier of last resort service for those who are not eligible for standard service and who do not choose to purchase electric generation service from a retail electric supplier. The cost of the power is a “pass-through” to those customers through the GSC charge on their bills. UI has wholesale power supply agreements in place for its entire standard service load for the first half of 2016, 80% of its standard service load for the second half of 2016 and for 30% of its standard service load for the first half of 2017. Supplier of last resort service is procured on a quarterly basis, however, from time to time there are no bidders in the procurement process for supplier of last resort service and in such cases UI manages the load directly. In August 2013, PURA approved new distribution rate schedules for UI for two years which became effective at that time and which, among other things, increased the UI distribution and CTA allowed ROE from 8.75% to 9.15%, continued UI’s existing earnings sharing mechanism by which UI and customers share on a 50/50 basis all distribution earnings above the allowed ROE in a calendar year, continued the existing decoupling mechanism, and approved the establishment of the requested storm reserve. In accordance with the approval by PURA of the acquisition, UI agreed not to initiate a rate case for new rates effective before at least January 1, 2017. On January 22, 2014, PURA approved new base delivery rates for CNG, with an effective date of January 10, 2014, which, among other things, approved an allowed ROE of 9.18%, a decoupling mechanism, and two separate ratemaking mechanisms that reconcile actual revenue requirements related to CNG’s cast iron and bare steel replacement program and system expansion. Additionally, the final decision requires the establishment of an earnings sharing mechanism by which CNG and customers share on a 50/50 basis all earnings above the allowed ROE in a calendar year. In accordance with the approval by PURA of the acquisition, SCG and CNG agreed not to initiate a rate case for new rates effective before at least January 1, 2018. Berkshire’s rates are established by the DPU. Berkshire’s 10-year rate plan, which was approved by the DPU and included an approved ROE of 10.5%, expired on January 31, 2012. Berkshire continues to charge the rates that were in effect at the end of the rate plan. In accordance with the approval by the DPU of the acquisition, Berkshire agreed not to initiate a rate case for new rates effective before at least June 1, 2018. REV In April 2014, the NYPSC commenced a proceeding entitled REV which is a wide ranging initiative to reform New York state’s energy industry and regulatory practices. REV has been divided into two tracks, Track 1 for Market Design and Technology, and Track 2 for Regulatory Reform. REV proposes regulatory changes that are intended to promote more efficient use of energy, deeper penetration of renewable energy resources such as wind and solar, and wider deployment of distributed energy resources, such as micro grids, on-site power supplies and storage. REV is also intended to promote greater use of advanced energy management products to enhance demand elasticity and efficiencies. Track 1 of this initiative involves a collaborative process to examine the role of distribution utilities in enabling market based deployment of distributed energy resources to promote load management and greater system efficiency, including peak load reductions. NYSEG and RGE are participating in the initiative with other New York utilities and are providing their unique perspective. NYPSC staff is currently conducting public statement hearings regarding REV across New York state. The NYPSC has issued a 2015 order in Track 1, which acknowledges the utilities’ role as a Distribution System Platform (DSP) provider, and requires the utilities to file an initial Distribution System Implementation Plan (DSIP) by June 30, 2016. The DSIP will also include information regarding the potential deployment of Automated Metering Infrastructure (AMI). Various proceedings have also been initiated by the NYPSC which are REV related, and each proceeding has its own schedule. These proceedings include the Clean Energy Fund, Demand Response Tariffs, and Community Choice Aggregation. Track 2 of the REV initiative is also underway, and through a NYPSC Staff Whitepaper review process, is examining potential changes in current regulatory, tariff, market design and incentive structures which could better align utility interests with achieving New York state and NYPSC’s policy objectives. New York utilities will also be addressing related regulatory issues in their individual rate cases. We expect an Order by the end of the second quarter of 2016. Ginna Reliability Support Service Agreement Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, LLC (GNPP), which is a subsidiary of Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC (CENG), owns and operates the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (Ginna Facility and together with GNPP, Ginna), a 581 MW single-unit pressurized water reactor located in Ontario, New York. In May 2014, the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) produced a Reliability Study, confirming that the Ginna Facility needs to remain in operation to avoid bulk transmission and non-bulk local distribution system reliability violations in 2015 and 2018. On July 11, 2014, GNPP filed a petition requesting that the NYPSC initiate a proceeding to examine a proposal for the continued operation of the Ginna Facility. Ginna asserted that “in the two preceding calendar years, 2012 and 2013, it had sustained cumulative losses at the Facility of nearly $100 million (including the allocation of CENG corporate overhead)” and that “CENG has not been compensated for any operational risk or an appropriate return on its investment over this period.” Based on the results of the 2014 Reliability Study, GNPP requested that: 1) the NYPSC determine that the continued operation of the Ginna Facility is required to preserve system reliability; and 2) the NYPSC issue an Order directing RGE to negotiate and file a Reliability Support Services Agreement (RSSA) for the continued operation of the Ginna Facility. In November 2014, the NYPSC ruled that GNPP had demonstrated that the Ginna Facility is required to maintain system reliability and that its actions with respect to meeting the relevant retirement notice requirements were satisfactory. The NYPSC also accepted the findings of the 2014 Reliability Study and stated that it established “the reliability need for continued operation of the Ginna Facility that is the essential prerequisite to negotiating an RSSA.” As such, the NYPSC ordered RGE and GNPP to negotiate an RSSA. On February 13, 2015, RGE submitted to the NYPSC an executed RSSA between RGE and GNPP. RGE requested that the NYPSC accept the RSSA and approve cost recovery by RGE from its customers of all amounts payable to GNPP under the RSSA utilizing the cost recovery surcharge mechanism. On October 21, 2015, RGE, GNPP, New York Department of Public Service, Utility Intervention Unit and Multiple Intervenors filed a Joint Proposal with the NYPSC for approval of the RSSA, as modified. The Joint Proposal provides a term of the RSSA from April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2017. RGE shall make monthly payments to Ginna in the amount of $15.4 million. RGE will be entitled to 70% of revenues from Ginna’s sales into the NYISO energy and capacity markets, while Ginna will be entitled to 30% of such revenues. The signatory parties recommend that the NYPSC authorize RGE to implement a rate surcharge effective January 1, 2016 to recover amounts paid to Ginna pursuant to the RSSA. RGE's payment obligation to Ginna shall not begin until the rate surcharge is in effect and FERC has issued an order authorizing the FERC Settlement agreement in the Settlement Docket. RGE will use deferred rate credit amounts (regulatory liabilities) to offset the full amount of the Deferred Collection Amount (including carrying costs), plus credit amounts to offset all RSSA costs that exceed $2.3 million per month, not to exceed a total use of credits in the amount of $110 million, applicable through June 30, 2017. To the extent that the available credits are insufficient to satisfy the final payment from RGE to Ginna then the RSSA surcharge may continue past March 31, 2017 to recover up to $2.3 million per month until the final payment has been recovered by RGE from ratepayers. In the month following the expiration of the term on March 31, 2017, Ginna shall prepare and issue an invoice to RGE for, and RGE shall pay to Ginna, a one-time payment in the amount of $11.5 million, which will be recovered from ratepayers. On February 23, 2016, the NYPSC unanimously adopted the Joint Proposal in the Ginna RSSA proceeding as in the public interest. On March 1, 2016, FERC issued an Order approving the contested Settlement agreement, subject to conditions. New York Transco Affiliates of National Grid, Central Hudson, NYSEG, and RGE, together with an affiliate of Consolidated Edison and Orange and Rockland Utilities, are part of a new organization, New York Transco. New York Transco is focused on developing electric transmission to meet future electricity needs of all New Yorkers and will develop New York transmission projects upon receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals. New York Transco members (Applicants) are requesting regulatory approval for a group of transmission projects expected to cost $1.7 billion, funded through debt and equity. NYSEG and RGE allocated twenty-percent equity contribution amounts to approximately $183 million over the period 2015 through 2018. Additional projects may be developed in the future. Equity investments will be expressly contingent on receiving necessary regulatory approvals and acceptable economic returns. The investment will be made through a Networks affiliate, Networks New York Transco, LLC, formed on November 3, 2014. New York Transco filed with FERC in early December 2014. The filing requests a formula base ROE of 10.6%, plus one-hundred fifty basis points ROE incentives. The filing also requests recognition of construction work in process, abandoned plant, regulatory asset for pre-commercial costs, and sixty-percent equity for five years. Various parties, including the NYPSC, have protested the filing with FERC. On April 2, 2015, the FERC issued an order granting, inter alia, Applicants’ request for a 50 basis point adder for NY Transco’s membership in the NYISO regional transmission organization (RTO), subject to the adder being capped within the zone of reasonableness after a determination of where within that zone its base level ROE should be set. The FERC also set the formula rate and base ROE issue for hearing and settlement judge procedures. In addition, the FERC rejected the Applicants’ cost allocation method for the Transmission Owner Transmission Solutions (TOTS) Projects because it would allocate costs to Power Supply Long Island (LIPA) and New York Power Authority (NYPA) that they did not voluntarily agree to pay. On November 5, 2015, Applicants, filed the Settlement with the FERC to resolve all outstanding issues associated with the TOTS Projects, including issues related to the TOTS Projects that were set for hearing and issues pending on rehearing. The issues regarding certain other projects remain pending. Minimum Equity Requirements for Regulated Subsidiaries Our regulated utility subsidiaries (NYSEG, RGE, CMP and Maine Natural Gas) of Maine and New York are each subject to a minimum equity ratio requirement that is tied to the capital structure assumed in establishing revenue requirements. The minimum equity ratio requirement has the effect of limiting the amount of dividends that may be paid and may, under certain circumstances, require that the parent contribute equity capital. The regulated utility subsidiaries are prohibited by regulation from lending to unregulated affiliates. The regulated utility subsidiaries have also agreed to minimum equity ratio requirements in certain borrowing agreements. These requirements are lower than the regulatory requirements. Movement of capital from our wholly owned unregulated subsidiaries is unrestricted. Pursuant to agreements with the relevant utility commission, UI, SCG, CNG and BGC are restricted from paying dividends if paying such dividend would result in a common equity ratio lower than 300 basis points below the equity percentage used to set rates in the most recent distribution rate proceeding as measured using a trailing 13-month average calculated as of the most recent quarter end. In addition, UI, SCG, CNG and BGC are prohibited from paying dividend to their parent if the utility’s credit rating as rated by any of the three major credit rating agencies, falls below investment grade, or if the utility’s credit rating, as determined by two of the three major credit rating agencies falls to the lowest investment grade and there is a negative watch or review downgrade notice. New Renewable Source Generation Under Connecticut law Public Act (PA 11-80), Connecticut electric utilities are required to enter into long-term contracts to purchase Connecticut Class I Renewable Energy Certificates, or RECs, On October 23, 2013, PURA approved UI’s renewable connections program filed in accordance with PA 11-80, through which UI will develop up to 10 MW of renewable generation. The costs for this program will be recovered on a cost of service basis. PURA established a base ROE to be calculated as the greater of: (A) the current UI authorized distribution ROE (currently 9.15%) plus 25 basis points and (B) the current authorized distribution ROE for CL&P (currently 9.17%), less target equivalent market revenues (reflected as 25 basis points). In addition, UI will retain a percentage of the market revenues from the project, which percentage is expected to equate to approximately 25 basis points on a levelized basis over the life of the project. UI expects the cost of this program, a planned 2.8 MW fuel cell facility in New Haven, solar photovoltaic and fuel cell facilities totaling 5 MW in Bridgeport, and a 2.2 MW fuel cell facility in Woodbridge to be approximately $47 million. Pursuant to Section 8 of Public Act 13-303, “An Act Concerning Connecticut’s Clean Energy Goals,” (PA 13-303), in January 2014, at DEEP’s direction, UI entered into three contracts for the purchase of RECs associated with an aggregate of 5.7 MW of energy production from biomass plants in New England. The costs of these agreements will be fully recoverable through electric rates. New England East-West Solution Pursuant to an agreement with The Connecticut Light and Power Company, or CL&P (the Agreement), UI has the right to invest in, and own transmission assets associated with, the Connecticut portion of CL&P’s New England East West Solution (NEEWS) projects to improve regional energy reliability. NEEWS originally consisted of four inter-related transmission projects being developed by subsidiaries of Northeast Utilities (doing business as Eversource Energy), the parent company of CL&P, in collaboration with National Grid USA. Three of the original projects have portions located in Connecticut: (1) the Greater Springfield Reliability Project (GSRP), which was fully energized in November 2013, (2) the Interstate Reliability Project (IRP), which was placed in service in the fourth quarter 2015 and (3) the Central Connecticut Reliability Project, the need for which is now planned to be addressed by CL&P’s Greater Hartford Central Connecticut solutions, in which UI does not anticipate making any investments. Under the Agreement, as of December 31, 2015, UI had made aggregate deposits of approximately $45 million since its inception, with assets valued at approximately $44.6 million having been transferred to UI. UI does not anticipate making any additional investments in NEEWS under the agreement. Equity Investment in Peaking Generation UI is party to a 50-50 joint venture with NRG affiliates in GenConn, which operates two peaking generation plants in Connecticut. The two peaking generation plants, GenConn Devon and GenConn Middletown, are both participating in the ISO-New England markets. PURA has approved revenue requirements for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 of $29.5 million and $36.5 million for GenConn Devon and GenConn Middletown, respectively. In addition, PURA has ruled that GenConn project costs incurred that were in excess of the proposed costs originally submitted in 2008 were p |