| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (A) Basis of Presentation: The Company’s fiscal year ends on March 31, and its fiscal quarters end on June 30, September 30 and December 31. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("U.S. GAAP") for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 (the "Annual Report"), filed with the SEC on June 14, 2022. The unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2022 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company and its results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2022 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending March 31, 2023, for any other interim period, or for any other future year. Any reference in these notes to applicable guidance is meant to refer to the authoritative U.S. GAAP as found in the Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC"), and as amended by Accounting Standards Updates ("ASU"), issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"). These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The Company has no unconsolidated subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. During November 2020, the historical financial statements and subsidiaries of AGT became the historical financial statements and subsidiaries of Sio upon consummation of the Domestication. As a result, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes reflect (i) the historical operating results of AGT and its subsidiaries prior to the Domestication; (ii) the operating results of the Company following the Domestication; and (iii) the Company’s equity structure for all periods presented. As a result of agreements reached during the six months ended September 30, 2022 for the early termination of lease agreements for an office facility in New York, New York and for a research and development facility and related office space in Durham, North Carolina, the associated balances of operating lease right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet have been eliminated. There have been no significant changes, other than those mentioned in the preceding paragraph, in the Company’s accounting policies from those disclosed in its Annual Report. (B) Going Concern and Management's Plans: The Company assesses and determines its ability to continue as a going concern in accordance with the provisions of ASC Subtopic 205-40, " Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern ", which requires the Company to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that its annual and interim consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are issued. Certain additional financial statement disclosures are required if such conditions or events are identified. If and when an entity’s liquidation/dissolution becomes imminent, financial statements should be prepared under the liquidation basis of accounting. Determining the extent, if any, to which conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, or the extent to which mitigating plans sufficiently alleviate any such substantial doubt, as well as whether or not liquidation is imminent, requires judgment by management. The Company has evaluated whether there are conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are issued. The Company has not yet achieved profitability. The Company expects to continue to incur operating and net losses, as well as negative cash flows from operations, including through the date of the proposed Dissolution. The Company has not generated any revenue to date. For the nine months ended December 31, 2022 and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, the Company incurred net losses of $15.5 million and $71.9 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $46.1 million and its accumulated deficit was $878.5 million. The Company estimates that its current cash and cash equivalents balance is sufficient to support operations beyond the twelve month period following the date that these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were issued. These estimates are based on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and the Company could use its available capital resources sooner than it currently expects. If the Dissolution is not approved by our stockholders, our future capital requirements, cash flows, and results of operations could be affected by and will depend on many factors that are currently unknown to us, including the outcome of our review and evaluation of any additional strategic alternatives or changes in our business strategy. (C) Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to certain assets and liabilities, including its research and development accruals, as well as assumptions used to estimate the fair value of its stock option awards, estimate its income tax expense and estimate its ability to continue as a going concern. Specifically, the Company’s assessment of the completeness of the information for research and development accruals is subject to variability and uncertainty. In addition, in certain circumstances, the determination of the nature and amount of research and development services that have been received during the reporting period requires judgment as the timing and pattern of vendor invoicing does not correspond to the level of services provided. The Company estimates the grant date fair value of stock option awards with only time-based vesting requirements using a Black-Scholes valuation model and uses a Monte Carlo Simulation method under the income approach to estimate the grant date fair value of stock option awards with market-based performance conditions. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates. (D) Net Loss per Share of Common Stock: Basic net loss per share of common stock is computed by dividing the net loss applicable to shareholders of common stock by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock and 3,301,998 pre-funded warrants (see Note 6(B)) outstanding during the period, without further consideration for potentially dilutive securities. The pre-funded warrants were fully exercised in July 2021 (See Note 6(B)). In accordance with ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share , the pre-funded warrants were included in the computation of basic net loss per share because the exercise price was negligible and they were fully vested and exercisable at any time after the original issuance date. Diluted net loss per share of common stock is computed by dividing the net loss applicable to shareholders of common stock by the diluted weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period calculated in accordance with the treasury stock method. In periods in which the Company reports a net loss, all common stock equivalents are deemed anti-dilutive such that basic net loss per share of common stock and diluted net loss per share of common stock are equivalent. Potentially dilutive shares of common stock have been excluded from the diluted net loss per share of common stock computations in all periods presented because such securities have an anti-dilutive effect on net loss per share of common stock due to the Company’s net loss. Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs") and stock options outstanding for a total of 1.9 million and 5.1 million shares of common stock were not included in the calculation of diluted weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, because they were anti-dilutive given the net loss of the Company. (E) Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurement: The Company utilizes fair value measurement guidance prescribed by accounting standards to value its financial instruments. The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy for instruments measured at fair value that distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and the Company’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability and are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. Fair value is defined as the exchange price, or exit price, representing the amount that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy that distinguishes among the following: • Level 1-Valuations are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. • Level 2-Valuations are based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active and models for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly. • Level 3-Valuations are based on inputs that are unobservable (supported by little or no market activity) and significant to the overall fair value measurement. To the extent the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents and previously included restricted cash. Cash consists of non-interest-bearing deposits denominated in the U.S. dollar, Swiss franc and Euro, while cash equivalents consists of interest-bearing money market fund deposits denominated in the U.S. dollar, which are invested in debt securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government and repurchase agreements fully collateralized by U.S. Treasury and U.S. government securities, and restricted cash consists of interest-bearing deposits denominated in the U.S. dollar. Cash and restricted cash are stated at their historical carrying amounts, which approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. The carrying values of the Company's money market fund included in cash and cash equivalents of $45.1 million and $61.0 million at December 31, 2022 and March 31, 2022, respectively, approximated their fair values, which are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. The following table summarizes the fair value of the Company's money market fund included in cash equivalents based on the inputs used at December 31, 2022 and March 31, 2022 in determining such values (in thousands): As of December 31, 2022 As of March 31, 2022 Fair Value Price Quotations (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Fair Value Price Quotations (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Money market fund $ 45,060 $ 45,060 $ — $ — $ 61,000 $ 61,000 $ — $ — (F) Recent Accounting Pronouncements: In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “ Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments " ("ASU No. 2016-13"). ASU 2016-13 requires that financial assets measured at amortized cost, such as loans, accounts and trade receivables and investments, be represented net of expected credit losses, which may be estimated based on relevant information such as historical experience, current conditions, and future expectation for each pool of similar financial asset. ASU No. 2016-13 requires enhanced disclosures related to trade receivables and associated credit losses. In May 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-05, “Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Targeted Transition Relief ", which allows for a transition election on certain instruments and is effective for smaller reporting companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022 and interim periods in those fiscal years. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-11, " Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses ", which amends certain aspects of ASU No. 2016-13, including transition relief for troubled debt restructuring ("TDR"), among other topics. In March 2022, the FASB issued ASU No. 2022-02, " Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures " ("ASU No. 2022-02"), which eliminates the accounting guidance on TDRs for creditors in ASC Subtopic 310-40 and amends the guidance on “vintage disclosures” to require disclosure of current-period gross write-offs by year of origination. ASU No. 2022-02 also updates the requirements related to accounting for credit losses under ASC Topic 326 and adds enhanced disclosures for creditors with respect to loan refinancings and restructurings for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. While the Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to materially impact the Company's consolidated financial statements and related disclosures because it does not currently have any investments or trade receivables, the impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements and disclosures will depend on the facts and circumstances of any specific future transactions. Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the SEC did not, or are not believed by management to, have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. |
