Commitments and Contingencies | Commitments and Contingencies Music License Agreements The Company is subject to minimum guarantee royalty payments associated under certain music license agreements. The following represents the Company's minimum annual guarantee payments under music license agreements for the next three years as of March 31, 2024 : Future Minimum Payments Fiscal Year (in millions) 2024 (remaining) $ 15.7 2025 50.7 2026 6.0 Total $ 72.4 Tread+ Product Recall Return Reserves and Cost Estimates On May 5, 2021, the Company announced a voluntary recall of its Tread+ in collaboration with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (" CPSC") and halted sales of this product to work on product enhancements . On May 18, 2023, the Company and the CPSC jointly announced the approval of a rear guard repair for the recalled Tread+. We have made this rear guard available to our Members who continue to own a Tread+ and during the three months ended March 31, 2023 , we resumed deliveries of the Tread+ from our existing inventory with the rear guard installed. The following table details the (benefit)/reduction to Connected Fitness Products revenue for actual and future returns and costs associated with the Tread+ product recall that were recorded in Connected Fitness Products cost of revenue. Three Months Ended March 31, Nine Months Ended March 31, 2024 2023 2024 2023 (in millions) Returns accrual for (benefit)/reduction to Connected Fitness Products revenue $ — $ (11.9) $ (3.9) $ 14.6 Costs (benefits) of product recalls — 13.2 (4.3) 15.7 Return reserves related to the impacts of the Tread+ recall of $7.5 million and $24.4 million were included within Accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2024 and June 30, 2023, respectively. Accruals for costs associated with the Tread+ repair of $8.9 million and $10.0 million were included within Accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2024 and June 30, 2023, respectively. The estimated return reserves are based on historical and expected product returns. The estimated costs associated with the Tread+ repair are primarily based on the estimated number of requests for the Tread+ repair and the estimated costs of the production, delivery, and installation of the remedy. Bike Seat Post Recall On May 11, 2023, in collaboration with the CPSC, the Company announced a voluntary recall of the original Peloton Bike (not Bike+) sold in the U.S. from January 2018 to May 2023 related to its seat post, and the Company is offering Members a free replacement seat post as the approved repair. As of March 31, 2024 and June 30, 2023 , accrual s of $2.4 million and $42.2 million, respectively, were included within Accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet related to the recall. The estimated cost to replace the bike seat posts is primarily based on the estimated number of requests for seat posts and the estimated costs of the production and shipment of the replacement parts. For more detail on the potential impacts of the recall to our business, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Connected Fitness Products and Members—Our products and services may be affected from time to time by design and manufacturing defects or product safety issues, real or perceived, that could adversely affect our business and result in harm to our reputation” in our Form 10-K. Commitments to Suppliers The Company utilizes contract manufacturers to build its products and accessories. These contract manufacturers acquire components and build products based on demand forecast information the Company supplies, which typically covers a rolling 12-month period. Consistent with industry practice, the Company acquires inventories from such manufacturers through blanket purchase orders against which orders are applied based on projected demand information and availability of goods. Such purchase commitments typically cover the Company’s forecasted product and manufacturing requirements for periods that range a number of months. In certain instances, these agreements allow the Company the option to cancel, reschedule, and/or adjust our requirements based on its business needs for a period of time before the order is due to be fulfilled. While the Company’s purchase orders are legally cancellable in many situations, there are some which are not cancellable in the event of a demand plan change or other circumstances, such as where the supplier has procured unique, Peloton-specific designs, and/or specific non-cancellable, non-returnable components based on our provided forecasts. As of March 31, 2024, the Company’s commitments to contract with third-party manufacturers for their inventory on-hand and component purchase commitments related to the manufacture of Peloton products were estimated to be approximately $123.5 million, of which $109.7 million is expected to be paid over the next twelve months. Legal and Regulatory Proceedings The Company is, or may become, a party to legal and regulatory proceedings with respect to a variety of matters in the ordinary course of its business, including the matters set forth below. We deny the allegations in the active matters described below and intend to vigorously defend against such matters. Some of our legal and regulatory proceedings, including matters and litigation that center around intellectual property claims, may be based on complex claims involving substantial uncertainties and unascertainable damages. Accordingly, except for proceedings that have settled or been terminated, or except where otherwise indicated below, it is not possible to determine the probability of loss or estimate damages for such matters, and therefore, the Company has not established reserves for any of these proceedings. When the Company determines that a loss is both probable and reasonably estimable, the Company records a liability, and, if the liability is material, discloses the amount of the liability reserved. Unless otherwise disclosed below, while it is reasonably possible that a loss may be incurred, the Company is unable to estimate a range of potential loss due to the complexity and current status of these lawsuits. In these matters, the Company has not established a reserve. We evaluate, on a regular basis, developments in our legal proceedings and other contingencies that could affect the amount of liability, including amounts in excess of any previous accruals and reasonably possible losses disclosed, and make adjustments and changes to our accruals and disclosures as appropriate. For the matters we disclose that do not include an estimate of the amount of loss or range of losses, such an estimate is not possible or is immaterial. Given that our legal and regulatory proceedings are subject to uncertainty, there can be no assurance that such legal proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. In May 2021, we initiated a voluntary recall of our Tread+ product in collaboration with the CPSC. In December 2022, we entered into a settlement agreement with the CPSC regarding matters related to the Tread+ recall. In the settlement, we agreed to pay a $19.1 million civil penalty, resolving the CPSC’s charges that we violated the Consumer Product Safety Act (the “CPSA”). On May 18, 2023, the Company and the CPSC jointly announced the approval of a rear guard repair for the recalled Tread+. The SEC is investigating our public disclosures concerning the Tread+ recall, as well as other matters. In addition, in 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) and the Department of Homeland Security subpoenaed us for documents and other information related to our statutory obligations, including under the CPSA. In addition to such investigations, we are presently subject to personal injury claims related to the safety of the Tread+. On November 16, 2021, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York consolidated two putative securities class action lawsuits against the Company and certain of the Company’s officers under the caption In re Peloton Interactive, Inc. Securities Litigation, Master File No. 21-cv-02369-CBA-PK, and appointed Richard Neswick as lead plaintiff. On January 21, 2022, the lead plaintiff filed an amended consolidated complaint in the action purportedly on behalf of a class consisting of those individuals who purchased or otherwise acquired our common stock between September 11, 2020 and May 5, 2021. Lead plaintiff alleged that the Company and certain of the Company’s officers made false or misleading statements in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), regarding the Peloton Tread+ and the safety of the product. On April 17, 2023, the parties entered into a settlement agreement to resolve the action for $14.0 million, for which the Company had previously taken a reserve. Under the terms of this agreement, defendants continue to deny any liability or wrongdoing. The settlement remains subject to court approval. On October 26, 2021 and January 24, 2022, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York consolidated four stockholder derivative actions purportedly on behalf of the Company against certain of the Company’s officers and directors under the caption In re Peloton Interactive, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Master File No. 21-cv-02862-CBA-PK (the “EDNY Derivative Action”), which alleged, among other claims, breaches of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste, and violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act. Alan Chu, Moshe Genack, Xingqi Liu and Anthony Franchi were appointed as co-lead plaintiffs. The EDNY Derivative Action was stayed on February 11, 2022. On December 14, 2022, two putative verified stockholder derivative actions in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, purportedly on behalf of the Company against certain of the Company’s officers and directors asserting similar allegations to those made in the EDNY Derivative Action, were consolidated as In re Peloton Interactive, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation, Consol. Case No. 2022-1051-KSJM (the “Chancery Derivative Action”), and stayed. On December 22, 2022, a stockholder filed a putative stockholder derivative action in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, asserting similar allegations to those in the EDNY Derivative Action and the Chancery Derivative Action against certain of the Company’s officers and directors, captioned Blackburn v. Foley, et al., Case No. 22-cv-01618-GBW, which was stayed on January 12, 2023. These cases remain stayed pending resolution of the settlement in In re Peloton Interactive, Inc. Securities Litigation, Master File No. 21-cv-02369-CBA-PK (E.D.N.Y.). On May 11, 2023, in collaboration with the CPSC, the Company announced a voluntary recall of the original Peloton Bike (not Bike+) sold in the U.S. from January 2018 to May 2023 related to its seat post, and the Company is offering a free replacement seat post as the approved repair. On June 9, 2023, Sam Solomon filed a putative securities class action against the Company and certain of the Company’s officers in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Case No. 1:23-cv-04279-MKB-JRC (the “2023 Securities Litigation”). Jia Tian and David Feigelman were appointed as co-lead plaintiffs. On November 6, 2023, co-lead plaintiffs filed an amended complaint purportedly on behalf of a class consisting of those individuals who purchased or otherwise acquired our common stock between May 6, 2021 and August 22, 2023, alleging that the defendants made false and/or misleading statements relating to the seat post recall in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act. On February 2, 2024, defendants served a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On April 2, 2024, plaintiffs served an opposition to defendants’ motion. On September 27, 2023, Courtney Cooper and Abdo P. Faissal filed a verified stockholder derivative complaint, purportedly on behalf of the Company against certain of the Company’s officers and directors, captioned Cooper v. Boone, et. al., Case No. 23-cv-07193-MKB-MMH, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, which alleges breaches of fiduciary duties and violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, as well as a claim for contribution under Sections 10(b) and 21D of the Exchange Act for any liability the Company may incur as a result of the 2023 Securities Litigation. On January 8, 2024, the court stayed the action pending resolution of the motion to dismiss in the 2023 Securities Litigation. On May 5, 2022, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York consolidated two putative securities class action lawsuits against the Company and certain of the Company’s officers under the caption City of Hialeah Employees Retirement System et al. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc., et al., Case No. 21-CV-09582-ALC-OTW and appointed Robeco Capital Growth Funds SICAV – Robeco Global Consumer Trends as lead plaintiff in the class action (the “SDNY Class Action”). Lead plaintiff filed its amended complaint on June 25, 2022, alleging that the defendants made false and/or misleading statements about demand for the Company’s products and the reasons for the Company’s inventory growth, and engaged in improper trading in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20A of the Exchange Act. On March 30, 2023, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, with leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on May 6, 2023, purportedly on behalf of a class consisting of those individuals who purchased or otherwise acquired our common stock between February 5, 2021 and January 19, 2022, and defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on June 16, 2023. Briefing on defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint in the SDNY Class Action was completed on August 18, 2023. On July 26, 2023, the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware consolidated three stockholder derivative actions purportedly on behalf of the Company against certain of the Company’s officers and directors under the caption In re Peloton Interactive, Inc. 2023 Derivative Litigation, Consol. Case No. 2023-0224-KSJM, which alleges that defendants breached their fiduciary duties by purportedly making false statements about demand for the Company’s products and engaging in improper trading. Allison Manzella, Clark Ovruchesky, Daniel Banks and Karen Florentino are co-lead plaintiffs. The court stayed the action on September 26, 2023 pending resolution of the motion to dismiss in the SDNY Class Action. On August 4, 2022, Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. (“MEC”) filed suit against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Index No. 652735/2022, alleging claims for breach of contract, or, in the alternative, breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing. MEC alleges that the Company breached a supply agreement under which MEC agreed to supply certain parts for Peloton products, and that it is entitled to damages in an amount exceeding $107.0 million, plus pre-judgment interest, fees, and costs. On September 23, 2022, the Company moved to dismiss MEC’s complaint. On January 6, 2023, the court partially granted and partially denied the Company’s motion to dismiss, dismissing MEC’s alternative claim for breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing with prejudice, but allowing MEC’s claim for breach of contract to move forward. The Company and MEC both appealed that ruling, and on April 11, 2024, the appellate court issued a decision affirming the ruling. The Company also appealed a discovery ruling and, on April 11, 2024, the appellate court ruled in the Company’s favor. In September 2023, the Company asserted a counterclaim and affirmative defense against MEC for fraudulent inducement of the supply agreement. Discovery is ongoing with a current fact discovery deadline of June 21, 2024. No trial date has been set. The Company cannot estimate the precise amount of any reasonably possible loss, as the estimate would depend on numerous uncertainties including future legal rulings, further factual developments concerning the extent of any recoverable damages, and the success of its counterclaim. The range of reasonably possible loss runs from zero to the full amount of MEC’s claim described above. |