Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation The accompanying interim condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , the interim condensed consolidated statement of shareholders'/members' equity for the successor nine months ended September 30, 2015 , successor period July 17, 2014 to September 30, 2014 and the predecessor period January 1, 2014 to July 16, 2014, the interim condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the successor three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , the successor period July 17, 2014 to September 30, 2014 and predecessor period July 1, 2014 to July 16, 2014 and January 1, 2014 to July 16, 2014, and the interim condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the successor nine months ended September 30, 2015 and successor period July 17, 2014 to September 30, 2014, and predecessor period January 1, 2014 to July 16, 2014, are unaudited. Interim Financial Statements The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of Amplify Snack Brands, Inc. (“Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required for annual financial statements. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements at and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, and in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position as of September 30, 2015 and results of our operations for the successor nine months ended September 30, 2015 and July 17, 2014 to September 30, 2014, and predecessor periods July 1, 2014 to July 16, 2014 and January 1, 2014 to July 16, 2014, and cash flows for the successor nine months ended September 30, 2015 and July 17, 2014 to September 30, 2014, and predecessor period from January 1, 2014 to July 16, 2014. The interim results for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2015 . Therefore, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 30, 2015. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future periods. Use of Estimates The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with GAAP. Management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting period. The Company routinely evaluates its estimates, including those related to accruals and allowances for customer programs and incentives, bad debts, income taxes, long-lived assets, inventories, equity-based compensation, accrued broker commissions and contingencies. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Segment Reporting The Company operates as one reportable segment: the marketing and distribution of BFY, ready-to-eat ("RTE") snacking products. Management made this determination based on the similar quantitative and qualitative characteristics of our products. Our chief executive officer is considered to be our chief operating decision maker. He reviews our operating results on an aggregate basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. Fair Value of Financial Instruments Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the reporting date. The accounting guidance establishes a three-tiered hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value: Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2—Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. The categorization of a financial instrument within the valuation hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities. Our term loan and revolving facility bear interest at a variable interest rate plus an applicable margin and, therefore, carrying amount approximates fair value. The following table presents liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis: Successor September 30, December 31, Liabilities: Founder contingent compensation-current portion $ 17,164 $ 593 Founder contingent compensation-long term portion 3,576 6,343 Contingent consideration (1) 390 — Notes payable, net 3,741 — Total liabilities $ 24,871 $ 6,936 (1) Contingent consideration is reported in Other liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Founder Contingent Compensation Considerable judgment is required in developing the estimate of fair value of Founder Contingent Compensation. The use of different assumptions or valuation methodologies could have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The fair value measurement of the Founder Contingent Compensation obligation relates to the employment agreements entered into in connection with the Sponsor Acquisition. The fair value measurement is based upon significant inputs not observable in the market (Level 3). For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we accrued $13.8 million as expense in our condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. To determine the fair value, we valued the total contingent compensation liability based on the expected probability weighted compensation payments corresponding to the performance thresholds agreed to under the applicable employment agreements, as well as the associated income tax benefit using the estimated tax rates that will be in effect. The current estimate represents the recognizable portion based on the maximum potential obligation allowable under the employment agreements. As discussed in Note 1, the Company is recognizing the fair value of the associated obligation ratably over the contractual service period. Contingent Consideration In April 2015, the Company acquired Paqui, LLC (“Paqui”) for total consideration of approximately $11.9 million , of which, approximately $0.4 million is contingent upon the achievement of a defined contribution margin in excess of the sum of the original principal amount and accrued interest of the notes issued to the sellers of Paqui. We utilized the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the original fair value of the contingent consideration. The fair value measurement is based upon significant inputs not observable in the market (Level 3). The contingent consideration is included in other liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company will satisfy this obligation with a cash payment to the sellers of Paqui upon the achievement of the milestone discussed above. Notes Payable As discussed in more detail in Note 3, in April 2015, the Company issued $3.9 million in unsecured notes to the sellers of Paqui in connection with its acquisition. The notes bear interest at a rate per annum of 1.5% with principal and interest due at maturity on March 31, 2018. We recorded an acquisition-date fair value discount of approximately $0.2 million based on market rates for debt instruments with similar terms (Level 3), which is amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes using the effective-interest method. Inventories Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market using the weighted-average cost method. The Company procures certain raw material inputs and packaging from suppliers and contracts with a third-party firm to assemble and warehouse finished product. The third-party co-manufacturer invoices the Company monthly for labor and certain raw material inputs upon the sale of finished product to customers during that period. Write-downs are provided for finished goods expected to become non-saleable due to age and provisions are specifically made for slow moving or obsolete raw ingredients and packaging. The Company also adjusts the carrying value of its inventories when it believes that the net realizable value is less than the carrying value. These write-downs are measured as the difference between the cost of the inventory, including estimated costs to complete, and estimated selling prices. Charges related to slow moving or obsolete items are recorded as a component of cost of goods sold. Charges related to packaging redesigns are recorded as a component of selling and marketing. Once inventory is written down, a new, lower-cost basis for that inventory is established. Recognition of Net Sales, Sales Incentives and Trade Accounts Receivable The Company offers its customers a variety of sales and incentive programs, including price discounts, coupons, slotting fees, in-store displays and trade advertising. The costs of these programs are recognized at the time the related sales are recorded and are classified as a reduction in net sales. These program costs are estimated based on a number of factors including customer participation and performance levels. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , the Company recorded total allowances against trade accounts receivable of $2.0 million and $3.0 million , respectively. Recoveries of receivables previously written off are recorded when received. Concentration Risk Customers with 10% or more of the Company’s net sales consist of the following: Successor Predecessor Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 July 17, 2014 to September 30, 2014 July 1, 2014 to July 16, 2014 Customer: Costco 29 % 38 % 34 % Sam's Club 18 % 18 % 21 % Successor Predecessor Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 July 17, 2014 to September 30, 2014 January 1, 2014 to July 16, 2014 Customer: Costco 32 % 38 % 33 % Sam's Club 17 % 18 % 22 % As of September 30, 2015 , Costco and Sam’s Club represented 21% and 15% , respectively, of the accounts receivable balances outstanding. The same two customers represented 18% and 31% , respectively, of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2014 . The Company outsources the manufacturing of its products to Assemblers Food Packaging LLC (“Assemblers”), a co-manufacturer in the United States. Assemblers represented 39% and 64% of accounts payable as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , respectively. Earnings per Share/Unit The Company follows ASC Topic 260 “Earnings Per Share” to account for earnings per share/unit. Basic earnings per share/unit has been computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares/units outstanding. Diluted earnings per share/unit has been computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares/units outstanding plus the effect of all potentially dilutive common units/stock equivalents, except when the effect would be anti-dilutive. The dilutive effect of nonvested stock granted to employees has been accounted for using the treasury stock method. As discussed in Note 1, in August 2015, the Company completed the Corporate Reorganization immediately prior to the Company's IPO. For purposes of computing net income per share, it is assumed that the reorganization of the Company had occurred for all successor periods presented and therefore the outstanding shares have been adjusted to reflect the conversion of shares that took place in contemplation of the IPO. Accordingly, the denominators in the computations of basic and diluted net income per share for the successor period July 17, 2014 to September 30, 2014, reflect the Company's reorganization. Successor Predecessor Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 July 17, 2014 to September 30, 2014 July 1, 2014 to July 16, 2014 Basic and diluted earnings per share/unit: Numerator: Net (loss) income (2,989 ) $ 2,126 $ 1,987 Denominator: Basic and diluted weighted average common shares/units outstanding (1) 68,710,803 67,588,737 400 Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share/unit $ (0.04 ) $ 0.03 $ 4,967.50 (1) A total of 6,289,197 unvested restricted stock awards were outstanding for the three months ended September 30, 2015, but were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effects of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Successor Predecessor Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 July 17, 2014 to September 30, 2014 January 1, 2014 to July 16, 2014 Basic and diluted earnings per share/unit: Numerator: Net income $ 5,475 $ 2,126 $ 30,581 Denominator: Basic weighted average common shares/units outstanding 68,253,104 67,588,737 400 Unvested restricted stock awards 6,740,985 — — Diluted weighted average common shares/units outstanding 74,994,089 67,588,737 400 Basic earnings per share/unit $ 0.08 $ 0.03 $ 76,452.74 Diluted earnings per share/unit $ 0.07 $ 0.03 $ 76,452.74 Tax Receivable Agreement ("TRA") As discussed in more detail in Notes 1 and 10, immediately prior to the consummation of the IPO in August 2015, the Company entered into a TRA with the former holders of units in Topco. The Company estimated an obligation of approximately $96.1 million based on the full and undiscounted amount of expected future payments under the TRA in consideration a of reduction in the Company's future U.S. federal, state and local taxes resulting from the utilization of certain tax attributes. The Company accounted for the obligation under the TRA as a dividend and elected to reduce additional paid in capital. Subsequent adjustments of the TRA obligation due to certain events, such as potential changes in tax rates or insufficient taxable income, will be recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Future cash payments under the TRA will be classified as a financing activity on the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. This ASU supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification 605, “Revenue Recognition”, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Codification. The standard requires entities to recognize the amount of revenue that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. This ASU must be applied using either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method and is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is in the process of assessing both the method and the impact of the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 on its financial position, results of operations, cash flows and financial statement disclosures. In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern: Disclosures about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The new guidance is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of ASU No. 2014-15 on its financial position, results of operations and financial statement disclosures. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”, which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements. ASU No. 2015-03 requires an entity to present such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability, rather than as an asset. Amortization of the costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The new guidance will be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented. The Company currently presents debt issuance costs as an asset and upon adoption of this ASU in 2017, will present such debt issuance costs as a direct deduction from the related debt liability. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, "Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory," which applies to inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out ("FIFO") or average cost. Under the updated guidance, an entity should measure inventory that is within scope at the lower of cost and net realizable value, which is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. This ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and should be applied prospectively. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of ASU No. 2015-11 on its financial position, results of operations and financial statement disclosures. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, “Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated With Line-of-Credit Arrangements-Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting” to clarify that given the absence of authoritative guidance within ASU No. 2015-03 for debt issuance costs related to the line-of-credit arrangements, such costs may be presented as an asset and subsequently amortized ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material effect on the condensed consolidated financial statements. |