Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Change in Fiscal Year In December 2016, the Company's Board of Directors approved a change in the fiscal year end from a calendar year ending on December 31 to a 52- or 53-week fiscal year ending on the last Saturday in December, effective beginning with fiscal year 2017. In a 52- or 53-week fiscal year, each of the Company's fiscal quarters will consist of two four-week fiscal months followed by a five- or six-week fiscal month. The change to the Company’s fiscal year does not impact the Company’s calendar year results for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the Company does not expect the change will impact the prior year comparability of each of the fiscal quarters and annual period in 2016 in future filings. Basis of Presentation The accompanying interim condensed consolidated balance sheets as of April 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the interim condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the 13 weeks ended April 1, 2017 and the three months ended March 31, 2016 and the interim condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the 13 weeks ended April 1, 2017 and three months ended March 31, 2016 , are unaudited. Interim Financial Statements The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of Amplify Snack Brands, Inc. (“Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required for annual financial statements. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements at and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, and in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position as of April 1, 2017 and results of our operations for the 13 weeks ended April 1, 2017 and the three months ended March 31, 2016 , and cash flows for the 13 weeks ended April 1, 2017 and three months ended March 31, 2016 . The interim results for the 13 weeks ended April 1, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2017. Therefore, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2017. Operating results for the 13 weeks ended April 1, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future periods. Use of Estimates The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with GAAP. Management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting period. The Company routinely evaluates its estimates, including those related to accruals and allowances for customer programs and incentives, bad debts, income taxes, long-lived assets, inventories, equity-based compensation, accrued broker commissions and contingencies. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Foreign Currency Transactions and Translation Exchange adjustments resulting from foreign currency transactions are recognized as a component of other non-operating income (loss) in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. For the Company's non-U.S. dollar functional currency subsidiaries, assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars by using period-end exchange rates. Income and expense items are translated at a weighted-average exchange rate prevailing during the period. Adjustments resulting from translation of financial statements are reflected as a separate component of shareholders' equity. Segment Reporting On September 2, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of Tyrrells Group, a diversified, international company that manufactures and markets BFY snack foods. As a result of this transaction, management determined that it operates in two operating and reportable segments, North America and International. The North America and International segments both operate in the large and growing global snack food category and whose brands and products are offered in the natural and conventional grocery, drug, convenience, food service, club, mass merchandise and other channels. The two snack food segments are reported separately based on differences in manufacturing and distribution methods and economic characteristics. Fair Value of Financial Instruments Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the reporting date. The accounting guidance establishes a three-tiered hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value: Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2—Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. The categorization of a financial instrument within the valuation hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities. Our term loan and revolving credit facility bear interest at a variable interest rate plus an applicable margin and, therefore, carrying amount approximates fair value. The fair value of our term loan and revolving credit facility are estimated based on Level 2 inputs, which were quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active. The following table presents liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): April 1, 2017 December 31, 2016 Liabilities: Contingent consideration (1) $ 2,491 $ 2,491 (1) Contingent consideration is reported in Other liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Contingent Consideration In connection with the acquisition of Boundless Nutrition, LLC (“Boundless Nutrition”) in April 2016, payment of a portion of the purchase price is contingent upon the achievement for the year ended December 31, 2018 ("Boundless Earn-out Period") of a defined contribution margin in excess of the sum of the original principal amount and accrued interest of the notes issued to the sellers of Boundless Nutrition (see Notes Payable discussion below for additional details). The Company is required to reassess the fair value of the contingent consideration at each reporting period. In connection with the acquisition of Paqui, LLC (“Paqui”) in April 2015, payment of a portion of the purchase price is contingent upon the achievement for the year ended December 31, 2018 ("Paqui Earn-out Period" and with the Boundless Earn-out Period, the "Earn-out Periods") of a defined contribution margin in excess of the sum of the original principal amount and accrued interest of the notes issued to the sellers of Paqui (see Notes Payable discussion below for additional details). The significant inputs used in the fair value estimates include numerous gross sales scenarios for the Earn-out Periods for which probabilities are assigned to each scenario to arrive at a single estimated outcome (Level 3). The estimated outcome is then discounted based on the individual risk analysis of the liability. The present value of the estimated outcome is used as the underlying price and the sum of the original principal amount and accrued interest of the notes issued to the sellers of Paqui and Boundless Nutrition ("Earn-Out Threshold") is used as the exercise price in the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Although the Company believes its estimates and assumptions are reasonable, different assumptions, including those regarding the operating results of Paqui and Boundless Nutrition, or changes in the future may result in different estimated amounts. The contingent consideration is included in Other liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company will satisfy this obligation with a cash payment to the sellers of each of Paqui and Boundless Nutrition upon the achievement of the respective milestone discussed above. The following table summarizes the Level 3 activity related to the Contingent Consideration (in thousands): 13 Weeks Ended April 1, 2017 Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Balance at beginning of the period $ 2,491 $ 1,911 Change in fair value of contingent consideration — — Balance at end of the period $ 2,491 $ 1,911 Notes Payable In April 2016, the Company issued $4.0 million in unsecured notes to the sellers of Boundless Nutrition in connection with its acquisition. The notes bear interest at a rate per annum of 0.67% with principal and interest due at varying maturity dates between April 29, 2017 and December 31, 2018. The Company recorded an acquisition-date fair value discount of approximately $0.2 million based on market rates for debt instruments with similar terms (Level 3), which is amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes using the effective-interest method. In April 2015, the Company issued $3.9 million in unsecured notes to the sellers of Paqui in connection with its acquisition. The notes bear interest at a rate per annum of 1.5% with principal and interest due at maturity on March 31, 2018. The Company recorded an acquisition-date fair value discount of approximately $0.2 million based on market rates for debt instruments with similar terms (Level 3), which is amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes using the effective-interest method. Inventories In our North American operations, inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value using the weighted-average cost method. The Company generally procures certain raw materials inputs and packaging from suppliers and contracts with third-party firms to assemble and warehouse finished products. The third-party co-manufacturers invoice the Company monthly for labor inputs upon the production or shipment of finished product during the period. In our international operations, inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value using the first-in, first-out method. The Company owns the manufacturing facilities used for production. The costs of finished goods inventories include raw materials, direct labor, indirect production, and overhead costs. Write-downs are provided for finished goods expected to become non-saleable due to age and provisions are specifically made for slow moving or obsolete raw ingredients and packaging. The carrying value of our inventories is adjusted when we believe that the net realizable value is less than the carrying value. These write-downs are measured as the difference between the cost of the inventory, including estimated costs to complete and estimated selling prices. Charges related to slow moving or obsolete items are recorded as a component of cost of goods sold. Charges related to packaging redesigns are recorded as a component of selling and marketing expenses. Once inventory is written down, a new, lower-cost basis is established. These adjustments are estimates that require management judgment. Actual results could vary from our estimates and additional inventory write-downs could be required. Recognition of Net Sales, Sales Incentives and Trade Accounts Receivable Net sales are recognized when the earnings process is complete and the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the customer, which occurs upon the receipt and acceptance of product by the customer. The Company’s customers are primarily businesses that are stocking its products. The earnings process is complete once the customer order has been placed and approved and the product shipped has been received by the customer or when product is picked up by the Company’s customers at the Company’s co-manufacturer. Product is sold to customers on credit terms established on a customer-by-customer basis. The credit factors used include historical performance, current economic conditions and the nature and volume of the product. The Company offers its customers a variety of sales and incentive programs, including price discounts, coupons, slotting fees, in-store displays and trade advertising. The costs of these programs are recognized at the time the related sales are recorded and are classified as a reduction in net sales. These program costs are estimated based on a number of factors including customer participation and performance levels. The Company extends unsecured credit to its customers in the ordinary course of business but mitigates the associated credit risk by performing credit checks and actively pursuing past due accounts. Accounts are charged to bad debt expense as they are deemed uncollectable based upon a periodic review of aging and collections. As of April 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Company recorded total allowances related to sales and incentive programs against trade accounts receivable of approximately $11.3 million and $9.3 million , respectively. Recoveries of receivables previously written off are recorded when received. Concentration Risk Customers with 10% or more of the Company’s net sales consist of the following: 13 Weeks Ended April 1, 2017 Three Months Ended March 31,2016 Customer: Costco 16 % 29 % Sam's Club 9 % 15 % As of April 1, 2017 , one customer represented 14% of the accounts receivable balance outstanding. No customers represented more than 10% of our consolidated accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2016 . The Company outsources a significant percentage of the manufacturing of its products to a single co-manufacturer in the United States. This co-manufacturer represented 15% and 19% of the accounts payable balance as of April 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively. Earnings per Share Basic earnings per share has been computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The Company's unvested shares of restricted common stock contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends and are considered to be participating securities in accordance with GAAP and therefore are included in the computation of basic earnings per share under the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common shares and participating securities according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Diluted earnings per share has been computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the effect of all potentially dilutive common stock equivalents, except when the effect would be anti-dilutive. The dilutive effect of unvested restricted stock units ("RSUs") and outstanding stock options has been accounted for using the two-class method or the treasury stock method, if more dilutive. 13 Weeks Ended April 1, 2017 Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) Basic and diluted earnings per share: Numerator: Net income $ 528 $ 8,402 Less: net income attributable to participating securities (19 ) (543 ) Net income attributable to common shareholders 509 7,859 Denominator: Basic: Basic weighted average shares outstanding 76,730,776 74,838,937 Less: participating securities (2,759,223 ) (4,833,353 ) Basic weighted average common shares outstanding 73,971,553 70,005,584 Basic earnings per share $ 0.01 $ 0.11 Diluted: Basic weighted average shares outstanding 76,730,776 74,838,937 Unvested RSUs (1) 15,520 — Outstanding stock options (2) — — Diluted weighted average shares outstanding 76,746,296 74,838,937 Less: participating securities (2,759,223 ) (4,833,353 ) Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 73,987,073 70,005,584 Diluted earnings per share $ 0.01 $ 0.11 (1) Excludes the weighted average impact of 1,358,158 and 116,068 unvested RSUs for the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2017 and three months ended March 31, 2016, respectively, because the effects of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. (2) Excludes the weighted average impact of 342,667 and 186,264 outstanding stock options for the thirteen weeks ended April 1, 2017 and three months ended March 31, 2016, respectively, because the effects of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Tax Receivable Agreement ("TRA") As discussed in Note 1, immediately prior to the consummation of the IPO in August 2015, the Company entered into a TRA with the former holders of units in Topco. In December 2015, all of the former holders of units in Topco collectively assigned their interests to a new counterparty. The Company estimated an obligation of approximately $96.1 million based on the full and undiscounted amount of expected future payments under the TRA in consideration of a reduction in the Company's future U.S. federal, state and local taxes resulting from the utilization of certain tax attributes. The Company accounted for the obligation under the TRA as a dividend and elected to reduce additional paid in capital. Subsequent adjustments of the TRA obligation due to certain events, such as potential changes in tax rates or insufficient taxable income, will be recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Future cash payments under the TRA will be classified as a financing activity on the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2017-04, "Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment". ASU 2017-04 simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairments by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under the previous guidance an impairment of goodwill is when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, whereas under the new guidance a goodwill impairment loss would be recognized if the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to the that reporting unit. The ASU is effective for annual and any interim impairment tests for periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We adopted this standard in January 2017, and will apply it as necessary in our financial statements. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments". ASU 2016-15 clarifies how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230. This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application is permitted. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-15 on its financial position, results of operations, cash flows and financial statement disclosures In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses” (Topic 326), which amends the guidance on the impairment of financial instruments. The standard adds an impairment model, referred to as current expected credit loss, which is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. The standard applies to most debt instruments, trade receivables, lease receivables, reinsurance receivables, financial guarantees and loan commitments. Under the guidance, companies are required to disclose credit quality indicators disaggregated by year of origination for a five-year period. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. We do not anticipate this standard will have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)". ASU 2016-08 clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing". ASU 2016-10 clarifies the implementation guidance on identifying performance obligations. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients." ASU 2016-12 addresses narrow-scope improvements to the guidance on collectability, non-cash consideration, and completed contracts at transition. Additionally, this ASU provides a practical expedient for contract modifications at transition and an accounting policy election related to the presentation of sales taxes and other similar taxes collected from customers. These ASUs apply to all companies that enter into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services. These ASUs are effective for public entities for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, but not before interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Entities have the choice to apply these ASUs either retrospectively to each reporting period presented or by recognizing the cumulative effect of applying these standards at the date of initial application and not adjusting comparative information. The Company does not believe these accounting standard updates will have a material impact on our results of operations. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation – Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting", which is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is permitted. The Company adopted the standard on October 1, 2016 and the adoption did not have an impact on its results of operations, statements of financial position or statements of cash flows. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)", which requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities related to lease arrangements longer than twelve months on the balance sheet. This standard also requires additional disclosures by lessees and contains targeted changes to accounting by lessors. The updated guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact of the adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 on its financial position, results of operations, cash flows and financial statement disclosures but does not believe the adoption will have a material impact. As of April 1, 2017 , the Company has $5.6 million of non-cancellable lease commitments. In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, "Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments", which simplifies the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination by eliminating the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments. This revised guidance was effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and related interim periods. The amendments in the update were applied prospectively to adjustments to provisional amounts that occurred after the effective date of the update with early application permitted for financial statements not yet issued. We have adopted this guidance and will apply it as necessary in our financial statements. Based on changes to our provisional purchase price accounting, during the 13 weeks ended April 1, 2017, we recorded approximately $0.2 million of additional expense. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, "Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory", which applies to inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out ("FIFO") or average cost. Under the updated guidance, an entity should measure inventory that is within scope at the lower of cost and net realizable value, which is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. This ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and should be applied prospectively. The Company adopted the standard January 1, 2017 and the adoption did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements. In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern: Disclosures about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company applied the standard for the 13 weeks ended April 1, 2017 condensed consolidated financial statements and it had no impact on its disclosures. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. This ASU supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification 605, “Revenue Recognition”, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Codification. The standard requires entities to recognize the amount of revenue that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date, which deferred the effective date of ASU No. 2014- 09 by one year, to December 15, 2017 for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after that date. The FASB will permit early adoption of the standard, but not before the original effective date of December 15, 2016. The Company is in the process of assessing both the method and the impact of the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 on its financial position, results of operations, cash flows and financial statement disclosures. The Company anticipates the primary impact of the adoption on its consolidated financial statements will be the additional disclosure requirements around revenue recognition in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Other areas that may potentially be impacted relate to the timing of the transfer of ownership and accounting surrounding the Company's trade promotions. We anticipate our internal control systems will be impacted by the implementation of the new standard. |