Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Change in Fiscal Year In December 2016, the Company's Board of Directors approved a change in the fiscal year end from a calendar year ending on December 31 to a 52- or 53-week fiscal year ending on the last Saturday in December, effective beginning with fiscal year 2017. In a 52- or 53-week fiscal year, each of the Company's fiscal quarters will consist of two four-week fiscal months followed by a five- or six-week fiscal month. The change to the Company’s fiscal year does not impact the Company’s calendar year results for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the Company does not expect the change will impact the prior year comparability of each of the fiscal quarters and annual period in 2016 in future filings. Basis of Presentation The accompanying interim condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the interim condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the 13 and 39 weeks ended September 30, 2017 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and the interim condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the 39 weeks ended September 30, 2017 and nine months ended September 30, 2016 , are unaudited. Interim Financial Statements The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of Amplify Snack Brands, Inc. (“Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required for annual financial statements. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements at and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, and in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position as of September 30, 2017 and results of our operations for the 13 and 39 weeks ended September 30, 2017 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 , and cash flows for the 39 weeks ended September 30, 2017 and nine months ended September 30, 2016 . The interim results for the 39 weeks ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2017. Therefore, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2017. Use of Estimates The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with GAAP. Management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting period. The Company routinely evaluates its estimates, including those related to accruals and allowances for customer programs and incentives, bad debts, income taxes, long-lived assets, inventories, equity-based compensation, accrued broker commissions and contingencies. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Foreign Currency Transactions and Translation Exchange adjustments resulting from foreign currency transactions are recognized as a component of other non-operating income (loss) in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). For the Company's non-U.S. dollar functional currency subsidiaries, assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars by using period-end exchange rates. Income and expense items are translated at a weighted-average exchange rate prevailing during the period. Adjustments resulting from translation of financial statements are reflected as a separate component of shareholders' equity. Segment Reporting On September 2, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of Tyrrells Group, a diversified, international company that manufactures and markets BFY snack foods. As a result of this transaction, management determined that it operates in two operating and reportable segments, North America and International. The North America and International segments both operate in the large and growing global snack food category and whose brands and products are offered in the natural and conventional grocery, drug, convenience, food service, club, mass merchandise and other channels. The two snack food segments are reported separately based on differences in manufacturing and distribution methods and economic characteristics. Fair Value of Financial Instruments Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the reporting date. The accounting guidance establishes a three-tiered hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value: Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2—Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. The categorization of a financial instrument within the valuation hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities. Our term loan and revolving credit facility bear interest at a variable interest rate plus an applicable margin and, therefore, carrying amount approximates fair value. The fair value of our term loan and revolving credit facility are estimated based on Level 2 inputs, which were quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active. The following table presents liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 Liabilities: Contingent consideration (1) $ 3,040 $ 2,491 (1) Contingent consideration is reported in Other long-term liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Contingent Consideration In connection with the acquisition of Boundless Nutrition, LLC, (“Boundless Nutrition”) a manufacturer and distributor of the Oatmega protein snack bar and BFY cookie products, in April 2016, payment of a portion of the purchase price is contingent upon the achievement for the year ending December 31, 2018 ("Boundless Earn-out Period") of a defined contribution margin in excess of the sum of the original principal amount and accrued interest of the notes issued to the sellers of Boundless Nutrition (see Notes Payable discussion below for additional details). The Company is required to reassess the fair value of the contingent consideration at each reporting period. In connection with the acquisition of Paqui, LLC (“Paqui”) in April 2015, payment of a portion of the purchase price is contingent upon the achievement for the year ending December 31, 2018 ("Paqui Earn-out Period" and with the Boundless Earn-out Period, the "Earn-out Periods") of a defined contribution margin in excess of the sum of the original principal amount and accrued interest of the notes issued to the sellers of Paqui (see Notes Payable discussion below for additional details). The significant inputs used in the fair value estimates include numerous gross sales scenarios for the Earn-out Periods for which probabilities are assigned to each scenario to arrive at a single estimated outcome (Level 3). The estimated outcome is then discounted based on the individual risk analysis of the liability. The present value of the estimated outcome is used as the underlying price and the sum of the original principal amount and accrued interest of the notes issued to the sellers of Paqui and Boundless Nutrition ("Earn-Out Threshold") is used as the exercise price in the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Although the Company believes its estimates and assumptions are reasonable, different assumptions, including those regarding the operating results of Paqui and Boundless Nutrition, or changes in the future may result in different estimated amounts. The contingent consideration is included in Other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company will satisfy this obligation with a cash payment to the sellers of each of Paqui and Boundless Nutrition upon the achievement of the respective milestone discussed above. The following table summarizes the Level 3 activity related to the Contingent Consideration (in thousands): 39 Weeks Ended September 30, 2017 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 Balance at beginning of the period $ 2,491 $ 1,911 Fair value of Boundless Nutrition contingent consideration at acquisition date — 1,085 Loss (gain) on change in fair value of contingent consideration 549 (505 ) Balance at end of the period $ 3,040 $ 2,491 Inventories In our North American operations, inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value using the weighted-average cost method. The Company generally procures certain raw materials inputs and packaging from suppliers and contracts with third-party firms to assemble and warehouse finished products. The third-party co-manufacturers invoice the Company monthly for labor inputs upon the production or shipment of finished product during the period. In our international operations, inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value using the first-in, first-out method. The Company owns the manufacturing facilities used for production. The costs of finished goods inventories include raw materials, direct labor, indirect production, and overhead costs. Write-downs are provided for finished goods expected to become non-saleable due to age and provisions are specifically made for slow moving or obsolete raw ingredients and packaging. The carrying value of our inventories is adjusted when we believe that the net realizable value is less than the carrying value. These write-downs are measured as the difference between the cost of the inventory, including estimated costs to complete and estimated selling prices. Charges related to slow moving or obsolete items are recorded as a component of cost of goods sold. Charges related to packaging redesigns are recorded as a component of selling and marketing expenses. Once inventory is written down, a new, lower-cost basis is established. These adjustments are estimates that require management judgment. Actual results could vary from our estimates and additional inventory write-downs could be required. Recognition of Net Sales, Sales Incentives and Trade Accounts Receivable Net sales are recognized when the earnings process is complete and the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the customer, which occurs upon the receipt and acceptance of product by the customer. The Company’s customers are primarily businesses that are stocking its products. The earnings process is complete once the customer order has been placed and approved and the product shipped has been received by the customer or when product is picked up by the Company’s customers at the Company’s co-manufacturer. Product is sold to customers on credit terms established on a customer-by-customer basis. The credit factors used include historical performance, current economic conditions and the nature and volume of the product. The Company offers its customers a variety of sales and incentive programs, including price discounts, coupons, slotting fees, in-store displays and trade advertising. The costs of these programs are recognized at the time the related sales are recorded and are classified as a reduction in net sales. These program costs are estimated based on a number of factors including customer participation and performance levels. The Company extends unsecured credit to its customers in the ordinary course of business but mitigates the associated credit risk by performing credit checks and actively pursuing past due accounts. Accounts are charged to bad debt expense as they are deemed uncollectable based upon a periodic review of aging and collections. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Company recorded total allowances related to sales and incentive programs against trade accounts receivable of approximately $12.8 million and $9.3 million , respectively. Recoveries of receivables previously written off are recorded as income when received. Concentration Risk Customers with 10% or more of the Company’s net sales consist of the following: 13 Weeks Ended September 30, 2017 Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 39 Weeks Ended September 30, 2017 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 Customer: Customer one 14 % 22 % 15 % 26 % Customer two 6 % 10 % 9 % 13 % The Company outsources a significant percentage of the manufacturing of its products to a single co-manufacturer in the United States. This co-manufacturer represented 16% and 19% of the consolidated accounts payable balance as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , respectively. As of both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , no customers represented more than 10% of the Company's consolidated accounts receivable balance outstanding. Earnings per Share Basic earnings per share has been computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The Company's unvested shares of restricted common stock contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends and are considered to be participating securities in accordance with GAAP and therefore are included in the computation of basic earnings per share under the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common shares and participating securities according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Diluted earnings per share has been computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the effect of all potentially dilutive common stock equivalents, except when the effect would be anti-dilutive. The dilutive effect of unvested restricted stock units ("RSUs") and outstanding stock options has been accounted for using the two-class method or the treasury stock method, if more dilutive. 13 Weeks Ended Three Months Ended 39 Weeks Ended September 30, 2017 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) Basic and diluted earnings per share: Numerator: Net income $ 674 $ 1,645 $ 2,388 $ 18,815 Less: net income attributable to participating securities (16 ) (83 ) (72 ) (1,078 ) Net income attributable to common shareholders 658 1,562 2,316 17,737 Denominator: Basic: Basic weighted average shares outstanding 76,739,354 75,455,047 76,752,323 75,032,287 Less: participating securities (1,849,483 ) (3,802,277 ) (2,304,845 ) (4,300,007 ) Basic weighted average common shares outstanding 74,889,871 71,652,770 74,447,478 70,732,280 Basic earnings per share $ 0.01 $ 0.02 $ 0.03 $ 0.25 Diluted: Basic weighted average shares outstanding 76,739,354 75,455,047 76,752,323 75,032,287 Unvested RSUs (1) 54,972 89,053 168,592 62,159 Outstanding stock options (2) — 13,660 — — Diluted weighted average shares outstanding 76,794,326 75,557,760 76,920,915 75,094,446 Less: participating securities (1,849,483 ) (3,802,277 ) (2,304,845 ) (4,300,007 ) Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 74,944,843 71,755,483 74,616,070 70,794,439 Diluted earnings per share $ 0.01 $ 0.02 $ 0.03 $ 0.25 (1) Excludes the weighted average impact of 545,725 and 373,848 unvested RSUs for the 13 weeks ended September 30, 2017 and three months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and 797,812 and 131,848 unvested RSUs for the 39 weeks ended September 30, 2017 and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, because the effects of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. (2) Excludes the weighted average impact of 642,540 and 87,703 outstanding stock options for the 13 weeks ended September 30, 2017 and three months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and 442,625 and 179,174 outstanding stock options for the 39 weeks ended September 30, 2017 and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, because the effects of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Tax Receivable Agreement ("TRA") As discussed in Note 1, immediately prior to the consummation of the IPO in August 2015, the Company entered into a TRA with the former holders of units in Topco. In December 2015, all of the former holders of units in Topco collectively assigned their interests to a new counterparty. The Company estimated an obligation of approximately $96.1 million based on the full and undiscounted amount of expected future payments under the TRA in consideration of a reduction in the Company's future U.S. federal, state and local taxes resulting from the utilization of certain tax attributes. The Company accounted for the obligation under the TRA as a dividend and elected to reduce additional paid in capital. Subsequent adjustments of the TRA obligation due to certain events, such as potential changes in tax rates or insufficient taxable income, will be recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Future cash payments under the TRA will be classified as a financing activity on the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In August 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-12, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities", which amends the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements specified under ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging . The ASU provides guidance to reduce the complexity of and simplify the application of hedge accounting by preparers. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company currently does not utilize derivative instruments, but may in the future. In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): "Scope of Modification Accounting", which amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements. The ASU provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting under ASC 718 Stock Compensation. An entity would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting conditions, and classification of the awards are the same immediately before and after the modification. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. We do not anticipate any significant award modifications, as such do not anticipate the adoption of ASU 2017-09 will have a material impact on our condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, "Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment". ASU 2017-04 simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairments by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under the previous guidance an impairment of goodwill is when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, whereas under the new guidance a goodwill impairment loss would be recognized if the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The ASU is effective for annual and any interim impairment tests for periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company adopted this standard in January 2017 and it did not have an impact on its results of operations, statements of financial position or statements of cash flows. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments". ASU 2016-15 clarifies how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230. This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application is permitted. The adoption of the standard will impact the classification of our contingent consideration payments in 2019 on our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses” (Topic 326), which amends the guidance on the impairment of financial instruments. The standard adds an impairment model, referred to as current expected credit loss, which is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. The standard applies to most debt instruments, trade receivables, lease receivables, reinsurance receivables, financial guarantees and loan commitments. Under the guidance, companies are required to disclose credit quality indicators disaggregated by year of origination for a five-year period. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. We do not anticipate this standard will have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)", which clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue. The guidance is applicable to all contracts with customers regardless of industry-specific or transaction-specific fact patterns. Further, the guidance requires improved disclosures as well as additional disclosures to help users of financial statements better understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue that is recognized. In 2015, the FASB issued a deferral of the effective date of the standard to the first quarter of 2018, with early adoption in fiscal 2017 permitted. In 2016, the FASB issued final amendments clarifying the implementation guidance for principal versus agent considerations, identifying performance obligations and the accounting for intellectual property licenses. Upon becoming effective, the Company will apply the amendments in the updated standard either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented, or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU No. 2014-09 and assessing the impact on its financial statements. As part of our assessment work to-date, we have formed an implementation work team, completed training on the new ASU’s revenue recognition model and are continuing our contract review and documentation. It has not yet been determined if the full retrospective or the modified retrospective method will be applied. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation – Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting", which is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is permitted. The Company adopted the standard on October 1, 2016 and the adoption did not have an impact on its results of operations, statements of financial position or statements of cash flows. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)", which requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities related to lease arrangements longer than twelve months on the balance sheet. This standard also requires additional disclosures by lessees and contains targeted changes to accounting by lessors. The updated guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact of the adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 on its financial position, results of operations, cash flows and financial statement disclosures but does not believe the adoption will have a material impact. As of September 30, 2017 , the Company has $9.4 million of non-cancellable lease commitments. We anticipate the majority of these leases will be recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheets upon adoption of this standard. In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, "Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments", which simplifies the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination by eliminating the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments. This revised guidance was effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and related interim periods. The amendments in the update were applied prospectively to adjustments to provisional amounts that occurred after the effective date of the update with early application permitted for financial statements not yet issued. We have adopted this guidance and will apply it as necessary in our financial statements. Based on changes to our provisional purchase price accounting, during the 39 weeks ended September 30, 2017, we recorded approximately $0.2 million of additional expense, previously reported financial information has not been restated for measurement period adjustments. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, "Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory", which applies to inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out ("FIFO") or average cost. Under the updated guidance, an entity should measure inventory that is within scope at the lower of cost and net realizable value, which is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. This ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and should be applied prospectively. The Company adopted the standard January 1, 2017 and the adoption did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements. In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern: Disclosures about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company applied the standard for the 39 weeks ended September 30, 2017 condensed consolidated financial statements and it had no impact on its disclosures. |