UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
_____________________
FORM 10-A
Amendment Number 4
_____________________
GENERAL FORM FOR REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES
Pursuant to Section 12(b) or (g) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
BIM HOMES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 47-4184146
_______________________________ ___________________
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
3136 Mission Gorge Road, Suite 111
San Diego, California
92120
________________________________________ __________
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (858) 459-1133
Copies to:
Daniel C. Masters, Esq.
P. O. Box 66
La Jolla, CA 92038
(858) 459-1133 - Tel
(858) 459-1103 - Fax
Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock – $0.0001 Par Value
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
Large accelerated filer [_]
Accelerated filer [_]
Non-accelerated filer [_]
Smaller reporting company [X]
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Background of the Issuer and Its Predecessor
BIM Homes, Inc. (“the Company” or “the Issuer”) was organized under the laws of the State of Delaware on March 6, 2014 as part of the implementation of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization of Pacific Shores Development, Inc. (“PSD”).
PSD was incorporated in the State of California in 2002 and was formed to acquire, hold and develop real estate. Its operations included acquiring and managing rental properties, acquiring and remodeling or rehabilitating properties for resale, and acquiring apartment buildings and converting the units to condominiums. In 2005 PSD established BIM Homes LLC as a wholly owned subsidiary to develop low cost single family homes on in-fill lot sites. The real estate crash and the recession of 2008 made it impossible for PSD and for BIM Homes LLC to obtain the financing needed to carry on its projects. PSD filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection in 2010 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California. PSD’s plan of reorganization was confirmed by the Court on August 19, 2011.
This Plan of Reorganization provided, among other things, for the incorporation of BIM Homes, Inc., the Issuer, and required the Issuer to issue 580,000 shares of its common stock and distribute these to PSD’s general unsecured creditors and to its administrative creditors. The shares were distributed pursuant to Section 1145 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As stated in the court ordered Plan of Reorganization, these shares were issued “to enhance the distribution to creditors” and enhance their opportunity to recover the losses they sustained in the PSD bankruptcy. The Disclosure Statement describing the Plan of Reorganization also stated that efforts should be made to have shares of the subsidiary publicly traded on the Over-The-Counter market in order to provide an opportunity for liquidity to the Creditors. The present filing is a result of this commitment.
The Disclosure Statement describing the Plan of Reorganization provided for BIM Homes, Inc. to carry forward the business of BIM Homes, LLC, the planning and permitting for development of homes on in-fill lots. The Disclosure Statement also provided that the Company should be incorporated in order to facilitate the distribution of shares in the Company to the former creditors of PSD. The Disclosure Statement also stated that it was possible that management would pursue business opportunities in other areas or in other industries. While it remains possible that management will find real estate development opportunities for the Company, this registration statement reflects managements’ belief that it is most likely that future opportunities for the Company will be in other industries.
The economic downturn of 2008 lasted longer than expected, and by the time the housing market recovered BIM’s home plans were obsolete and its original management had other full time employment, effectively reducing the opportunity for the Company to use the know how it had developed. Konstantin Zecevic, BIM’s first president, resigned on March 6, 2014 because he lacked the time to devote to the Issuer’s business. Daniel Masters, BIM’s current president, took over as president at that time. Since March, 2014 Mr. Masters has engaged in a search, without success, for a business that the Issuer could enter. On June 1, 2015 Mr. Howard Behling joined Mr. Masters as an officer and director of the Company. Mr. Behling is a business consultant working chiefly in the healthcare industry. It is hoped that he will be able to assist Mr. Masters in identifying a new business direction for the Company.
Description of Current Business
The Company’s two officers and directors (there are no plans for additional officers or directors) have determined that the Company lacks the resources to re-enter the real estate development business. Therefore, the Company’s two officers and directors have determined to seek a merger or an acquisition with a larger, better capitalized entity which will accomplish the plan as ordered by the Court: “to enhance the distribution to creditors” and bring greater value to our shareholders. Therefore, as of the date hereof, the Company can be defined as a "shell" company, an entity which is generally described as having no or
nominal operations and with no or nominal assets. As a shell company, our purpose at this time, described more fully below, is to negotiate a business agreement or combination with a larger entity which will bring greater value to our shareholders. As of the date hereof, we have not identified any potential merger or acquisition partner.
The Company’s two officers and directors believe that a potential merger or acquisition target will be a business which seeks the benefits of our shareholder base or status as a reporting issuer. The Company’s two officers and directors will not restrict its search to any specific industry or geographic location. The Company’s two officers and directors anticipate that the Company may be able to participate in only one potential business venture because a business partner might require exclusivity. This lack of diversification should be considered a substantial risk to our shareholders because it will not permit us to offset potential losses from one venture against gains from another.
We may seek a business opportunity with entities which have recently commenced operations, or which wish to expand into new products or markets, to develop a new product, or to utilize the public marketplace in order to raise additional capital. This discussion of the proposed business is purposefully general and is not meant to be restrictive of our discretion to search for and enter into potential business opportunities.
We anticipate that the selection of a business opportunity in which to participate will be complex and extremely risky due to general economic conditions, rapid changes in the business environment, and shortages of available capital. The Company’s two officers and directors believe that there are numerous firms seeking the benefits of an issuer who has complied with the 1934 Act, but this is by no means certain.
It is our present intent to continue to comply with all of the reporting requirements under the 1934 Act. The Company’s two officers and directors, Daniel Masters and Howard Behling, have agreed to provide the necessary funds, without interest, for the Company to comply with the 1934 Act reporting requirements, provided that they are officers and directors of the Company when the obligation is incurred. These officers have not, as of the date hereof, set a maximum dollar amount that they are willing to provide to the Company.
It is anticipated that we will incur nominal expenses in the implementation of the business plan described herein. Because we have no capital with which to pay these anticipated expenses, the Company’s two officers and directors will pay these charges with their personal funds, as interest free loans to the Company or as capital contributions. However, if loans, the only opportunity which the two officers and directors have for repayment of these loans will be from a prospective merger or acquisition candidate.
Acquisition of Opportunities
The two officers and directors of the Company will seek out business combination opportunities through their personal business contacts. Our President regularly attends meetings of the National Investment Banking Association, the Southern California Investment Association, the San Diego Venture Group, the Los Angeles Venture Association, and similar groups where businesses seeking to expand and investors and related professionals (e.g. consultants, accountants, and attorneys) meet in hopes of working together. The two officers and directors of the Company will not be limited in their search to these groups but believe that these groups will provide a networking platform from which to seek business combination opportunities.
In implementing a structure for a particular business venture, we may become a party to a merger, consolidation, reorganization, joint venture, or licensing agreement with another corporation or entity. We may also acquire stock or assets of an existing business. On the consummation of an agreement, it is probable that the present two officers and directors and the present shareholders of the Company will no longer be in control of the Company. In addition, and especially if there is a business combination, our two directors may, as part of the terms of the acquisition or merger, resign and be
replaced by new directors without a vote of our shareholders or may sell their stock in the Company. It is anticipated that any securities issued by our Company in any such reorganization would be issued in reliance upon an exemption from registration under applicable federal and state securities laws.
We will participate in a business opportunity only after the negotiation and execution of appropriate written agreements. Although the terms of such agreements cannot be predicted, generally such agreements will require some specific representations and warranties by all of the parties thereto, will specify certain events of default, will detail the terms of closing and the conditions which must be satisfied by each of the parties prior to and after such closing, will outline the manner of verifying revenue and bearing costs, including costs associated with the Company's attorneys and accountants, will set forth remedies on default and will include miscellaneous other terms.
It is our present intent that we will not submit a potential merger, acquisition, or similar reorganization to our shareholders for approval. We are incorporated under the laws of Delaware and Delaware’s General Corporation Law, Section 228, provides that “…any action required by this chapter to be taken at any annual or special meeting of stockholders of a corporation, or any action which may be taken at any annual or special meeting of such stockholders, may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if a consent or consents in writing, setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted…” Delaware’s General Corporation Law, Section 228, also provides that “Prompt notice of the taking of the corporate action without a meeting… shall be given to those stockholders or members who have not consented in writing…”
Our President, Daniel Masters, owns 77.5% of our issued and outstanding shares of stock; thus his written consent to a potential merger or acquisition constitutes more than the minimum number of votes necessary to authorize such a reorganization under Delaware law. Prompt notice of any such action will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 8-K and also on Forms PREM14C and DEFM14C and copies of these filings will be sent by first class mail, postage pre-paid, to each of our shareholders.
Our present intent is that we will not enter into a business combination agreement with an entity which cannot provide independent audited financial statements at the time of closing of the proposed transaction and supply other information that is normally disclosed in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We are subject to all of the reporting requirements included in the 1934 Act. These rules are intended to protect investors by deterring fraud and abuse in the securities markets through the use of shell companies. Included in these requirements is the affirmative duty of the Company to file independent audited financial statements as part of its Form 8-K to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission upon consummation of a merger or acquisition, as well as the Company's audited financial statements included in its annual report on Form 10-K. In addition, in the filing of the Form 8-K that we file to report an event that causes us to cease being a shell company, we are required to include that information that is normally reported by a company in its original Form 10.
We do not intend to hire an investment banker, a business broker, or a similar professional specializing in business acquisitions. Once a potential acquisition has been identified we do intend to hire an attorney experienced in business acquisitions to prepare or review the merger or acquisition agreements and documents. Because we have no capital with which to pay legal fees our President, Daniel Masters, has agreed to pay these fees with personal funds, as an interest free loan to the Company or as a capital contribution. However, this is a voluntary agreement; Mr. Masters is not contractually obligated to pay this expense.
Accounting in the Event of a Business Combination
Future business combinations will be recorded in accordance with the FASB Accounting Standards Codification 805 (ASC 805).
We have been informed that most business combinations will be accounted for as a reverse acquisition with us being the surviving registrant. As a result of any business combination, if the acquired entity's shareholders will exercise control over us, the transaction will be deemed to be a capital transaction where we are treated as a non-business entity. Therefore, the accounting for the business combination is identical to that resulting from a reverse merger, except no goodwill or other intangible assets will be recorded. For accounting purposes, the acquired entity will be treated as the accounting acquirer and, accordingly, will be presented as the continuing entity.
Reporting Issuer Status
The Company chose to become a reporting company on a voluntary basis because one attraction of the Company as a merger partner or acquisition vehicle will be its status as a public company. In addition, we became a reporting company to enhance investor protection and to provide information if a trading market commences.
Based upon our proposed future business activities, it is possible that we may be deemed a "blank check" company (see “Risk Factors”). The Securities and Exchange Commission definition of such a company is a development stage company that has no specific business plan or purpose, or has indicated that its business plan is to engage in a merger or acquisition with an unidentified company or companies, or other entity or person, and is issuing "penny stock."
A "penny stock" security is any equity security other than a security (i) that is a reported security (ii) that is issued by an investment company (iii) that is a put or call issued by the Option Clearing Corporation (iv) that has a price of $5.00 or more (except for purposes of Rule 419 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) (v) that is registered on a national securities exchange (vi) that is authorized for quotation on the NASDAQ Stock Market, unless other provisions of the defining rule are not satisfied, or (vii) that is issued by an issuer with (a) net tangible assets in excess of $2,000,000, if in continuous operation for more than three years or $5,000,000 if in operation for less than three years or (b) average revenue of at least $6,000,000 for the last three years. Our stock will likely be deemed a “penny stock.”
JOBS Act
The United States Congress passed the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), which provides for certain exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to public companies that are reporting companies and are “emerging growth companies.” We qualify as an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act. As a result, we are permitted to, and intend to, rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements. For so long as we are an emerging growth company we will not be required to:
·
have an auditor report on our internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;
·
comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements (i.e., an auditor discussion and analysis);
·
submit certain executive compensation matters to shareholder advisory votes, such as “say-on-pay” and “say-on-frequency;” and
·
disclose certain executive compensation related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the Chief Executive’s compensation to median employee compensation.
We will remain an “emerging growth company” until the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of our first sale of common equity securities pursuant to an effective registration statement, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our total annual
gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which would occur if the market value of our ordinary shares that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three year period.
In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards pursuant to Section 107(b) and the election is irrevocable.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our business is subject to numerous risk factors, including the following:
1. We have no operating history and no revenues or earnings from operations.
We have no assets. We will, in all likelihood, sustain operating expenses without corresponding revenues, at least until the consummation of a business combination. This may result in us incurring a net operating loss that will increase continuously until we can consummate a business combination with a profitable business entity. There is no assurance that we can identify such a business entity and consummate such an agreement or combination.
2. We may not be able to continue to operate as a going concern.
Our auditor has expressed the opinion that we may not be able to continue as a going concern. His opinion letter and the notation in the financial statements indicate that we do not have revenues, cash reserves, or other material assets and that we are relying on advances from stockholders, officers and directors to meet our limited operating expenses. We may become insolvent if we are unable to pay our debts in the ordinary course of business as they become due.
3. Our proposed plan of operation is speculative.
The success of our proposed plan of operation will depend to a great extent on the operations, financial condition and management of the business opportunity which we identify, if any is identified. While our two officers and directors intend to seek business agreement(s) or combination(s) with entities having established operating histories, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in locating candidates meeting such criteria. In the event we complete a business agreement or combination, of which there can be no assurance, the success of our operations may be dependent upon management of the successor firm or venture partner firm and numerous other factors beyond our control.
4. We face intense competition for business combination opportunities.
We are and will continue to be an insignificant participant in the business of seeking mergers with, joint ventures with and acquisitions of small private and public entities. A large number of established and well-financed entities, including venture capital firms and investment banks, are active in mergers and acquisitions of companies that may be our desirable target candidates. Nearly all such entities have significantly greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial capabilities than we have and, consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in identifying possible business opportunities and successfully completing a business combination. Moreover, we will also compete in seeking merger or acquisition candidates with numerous other small public companies.
5. We have no agreements for a business combination or licensing transaction and
have established no standards for such transactions.
We have no arrangement, agreement or understanding with respect to entering into an agreement or engaging in a merger with, joint venture with or acquisition of, a private or public entity. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in identifying and evaluating suitable business opportunities or in concluding a business transaction. Our two officers and directors have not identified any particular business for our evaluation. There is no assurance that we will be able to negotiate a business combination on terms favorable to us. We have not established a specific length of operating history or a specified level of earnings, assets, net worth or other criteria which we will require a target business opportunity to have achieved, and without which we would not consider a business transaction in any form with such business opportunity. Accordingly, we may enter into a business agreement or a business combination with a business having no significant operating history, losses, limited potential or no potential for earnings, limited assets, negative net worth or other negative characteristics.
6. Our success is dependent on our two officers and directors who have other full
time employment, have limited experience, and will only devote limited time (part
time) to working for the Company, all of which makes our future even more
uncertain.
Daniel Masters is the President and a Director of the Issuer, and Howard Behling is the Secretary, Treasurer and a Director of the Issuer. These are the only offices and directors of the Company. Both Mr. Masters and Mr. Behling will serve without pay while maintaining other employment. As of the date hereof, each is devoting no more than one hour per week to the affairs of the Company, however, both expect to spend approximately five hours per week on the affairs of the Company and the search for a suitable merger or acquisition partner after the effectiveness of this registration statement. Notwithstanding the limited availability of our two officers, loss of the services of either officer would adversely affect development of our business and its likelihood of continuing in operation.
7. Our two officers and directors have limited experience in mergers and
acquisitions, which makes our ability to complete a successful merger or
acquisition more uncertain.
Although both our President, Daniel Masters, and our Secretary/Treasurer, Howard Behling, have experience in business reorganizations, both have limited direct experience in negotiating mergers and acquisitions. This lack of experience makes our ability to complete a successful merger or acquisition more uncertain.
8. Our two officers and directors may have a conflict of interest in selecting
a merger or acquisition target because of loans they may make to our Company.
As noted above, the Company’s two officers and directors have agreed that they will pay the Company’s anticipated operating expenses with their personal funds, making interest free loans to the Company or capital contributions. If they make interest free loans to the Company, the only opportunity they will have for repayment of these loans will be from a prospective merger or acquisition candidate. This may result in a conflict of interest in selecting a merger candidate as the officers may prefer a candidate which will repay their loans over one which will not.
9. The reporting requirements under federal securities law may delay or
prevent us from making certain acquisitions.
Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the "1934 Act"), require companies subject thereto to provide certain information about significant acquisitions, including certified financial statements for the company acquired, covering one, two, or three years, depending on the relative size of the acquisition. The time and additional costs that may be incurred by some target entities to prepare such statements may significantly delay or essentially preclude consummation of an otherwise desirable acquisition by the Company. Acquisition prospects that do not have or are unable to
obtain the required audited statements may not be appropriate for acquisition so long as the reporting requirements of the 1934 Act are applicable.
In addition to the audited financial statements, in the filing of the Form 8-K that we file to report an event that causes us to cease being a shell company, we will be required to include that information that is normally reported by a company in a Form 10. The time and additional costs that may be incurred by some target entities to prepare and disclose such information may significantly delay or essentially preclude consummation of an otherwise desirable acquisition by the Company.
10. An acquisition could create a situation wherein we would be required to
register under The Investment Company Act of 1940 and thus be required to
incur substantial additional costs and expenses.
Although we will be subject to regulation under the 1934 Act, our two officers and directors believe the Company will not be subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940, insofar as we will not be engaged in the business of investing or trading in securities. In the event we engage in a business combination that results in us holding passive investment interests in a number of entities, we could be subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940. In such event, we would be required to register as an investment company and could be expected to incur significant registration and compliance costs. We have obtained no formal determination from the Securities and Exchange Commission as to the status of our Company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and, consequently, any violation of such Act would subject us to material adverse consequences.
11. A merger, acquisition, or similar agreement would most likely be exclusive,
resulting in a lack of diversification.
Our two officers and directors anticipate that the Company may be able to participate in only one potential business venture because a business partner might require exclusivity. This lack of diversification should be considered a substantial risk to our shareholders because it will not permit us to offset potential losses from one venture against gains from another.
12. Our two officers/directors most likely will not remain after we complete a
business combination or will have little power to influence the direction
of business development.
A business combination will, in all likelihood, result in management of the acquired business determining the timing and funding of our development. Our two officers and directors will have little to do except monitor business activity, if they remain in management at all. A business combination involving the issuance of our Common Stock will, in all likelihood, result in shareholders of a private company obtaining a controlling interest in us. Any such business combination may require our two officers and directors to sell or transfer all or a portion of the Company's Common Stock held by them, and/or resign as members of the Board of Directors. The resulting change in our control could result in removal of one or both present officers and directors and a corresponding reduction in or elimination of their participation in our future affairs.
13. If we do any business combination, each shareholder will most likely
hold a substantially lesser percentage ownership in the Company.
If we enter a business combination with a private concern, that, in all likelihood, would result in the Company issuing securities to shareholders of any such private company. The issuance of our previously authorized and unissued stock would result in reduction in percentage of shares owned by our present and prospective shareholders and may result in a change in our control or in our management.
14. As a shell company, we face substantial additional adverse business and
legal consequences if we enter a business combination.
We may enter into a business combination with an entity that desires to establish a public trading market for its shares. A business opportunity may attempt to avoid what it deems to be adverse consequences of undertaking its own public offering by seeking a business combination with us. Such consequences may include, but are not limited to, time delays of the registration process, significant expenses to be incurred in such an offering, conditions and restrictions imposed by underwriters, and the costs to comply with various state (“Blue Sky”) securities laws.
On June 29, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted final rules amending the Form S-8 and the Form 8-K for shell companies like us. The amendments expand the definition of a shell company to be broader than a company with no or nominal operations/assets or assets consisting of cash and cash equivalents. The amendments prohibit the use of a Form S-8 (a form used by a corporation to register securities issued to an employee, director, officer, consultant or advisor), under certain circumstances, and revise the Form 8-K to require a shell company to include current Form 10 information, including audited financial statements, in the filing on Form 8-K that the shell company files to report the acquisition of the business opportunity. This initial filing must be made within four days of the acquisition and the Form 8-K filing may be reviewed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The prospects of certain disclosures, or the lack of the ability to issue securities using a Form S-8, or the requirement of audited financial statements, or the unwillingness to assume the significant costs of compliance, may make an otherwise appropriate acquisition target unwilling to enter a business combination with us.
15. The requirement of audited financial statements may disqualify some business
opportunities seeking a business combination with us.
Our two officers and directors believe that any potential business combination opportunity must provide audited financial statements for review, for the protection of all parties to the business combination. One or more attractive business opportunities may choose to forego the possibility of a business combination with us, rather than incur the expenses associated with preparing audited financial statements.
16. One of our officers is also our principal shareholder and he will be able
to approve all corporate actions without shareholder consent and will
control our Company.
Our principal shareholder, Daniel Masters, currently owns approximately 77.5% of our Common Stock. Because of this, he will have the controlling vote in all matters requiring approval by our shareholders, but not requiring the approval of the minority shareholders. In addition, he is now the Company’s President and one of its two officers and directors. Because he is the majority shareholder, he will be able to elect all of the members of our board of directors, allowing him to exercise significant control of our affairs and management. In addition, he may transact corporate business requiring shareholder approval, including approval of the acquisition of, or merger with, an operating company, by written consent, without soliciting the votes of other shareholders.
17. Our Common Stock may never be publicly traded and holders may have no ability to
sell their shares.
There is no established public trading market for our shares of Common Stock, and there is no assurance that our Common Stock will be accepted for listing on the OTC market or in any other trading system in the future.
There can be no assurance that a market for our Common Stock will be established or that, if established, a market will be sustained. Therefore, if you purchase our Common Stock you may be unable to sell the shares. Accordingly, you should be able to bear the financial risk of losing your entire investment.
Only market makers can apply to quote securities. A market maker who desires to initiate quotations in the OTC market system must complete an application (Form 211) (unless an exemption is applicable) and by doing so, will have to represent that it has satisfied all applicable requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-11 and the filing and information requirements promulgated under the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("Finra") Bylaws. The OTC Pink market will not charge us a fee for being quoted on the service. Finra rules prohibit market makers from accepting any remuneration in return for quoting issuers' securities on the OTC market or any similar medium. Finra will review the market maker's application (unless an exemption is applicable). If cleared, it cannot be assumed by any investor that any federal, state or self-regulatory requirements other than certain Finra rules and Rule 15c2-11 have been considered by Finra. Furthermore, the clearance should not be construed by any investor as indicating that Finra, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or any state securities commission has passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the documents contained in the submission.
The OTC Pink market is a market maker or dealer-driven system offering quotation and trading reporting capabilities - a regulated quotation service - that displays real-time quotes, last-sale prices, and volume information in OTC equity securities. The OTC Pink securities are not listed and traded on the floor of an organized national or regional stock exchange. Instead, OTC Pink securities transactions are conducted through a telephone and computer network connecting market makers or dealers in stocks.
18. If our Common Stock does not meet blue sky resale requirements, certain
shareholders may be unable to resell our Common Stock.
The resale of Common Stock must meet the blue sky resale requirements in the states in which the proposed purchasers reside. If we are unable to qualify the Common Stock and there is no exemption from qualification in certain states, the holders of the Common Stock or the purchasers of the Common Stock may be unable to sell them.
19. Our shareholders may face significant restrictions on the resale of our
Common Stock due to state "blue sky" laws or if we are determined to be a
"blank check" company.
There are state regulations that may adversely affect the transferability of our Common Stock. We have not registered our Common Stock for resale under the securities or "blue sky" laws of any state. We may seek qualification or advise our shareholders of the availability of an exemption. We are under no obligation to register or qualify our Common Stock in any state or to advise the shareholders of any exemptions.
Current shareholders, and persons who desire to purchase the Common Stock in any trading market that may develop in the future, should be aware that there might be significant state restrictions upon the ability of new investors to purchase the Common Stock.
Blue sky laws, regulations, orders, or interpretations place limitations on offerings or sales of securities by "blank check" companies or in "blind-pool" offerings, or if such securities represent "cheap stock" previously issued to promoters or others. Our majority shareholder, because he received stock at a price of $.0001 for each share, may be deemed to hold "cheap stock." These limitations typically provide, in the form of one or more of the following limitations, that such securities are:
(a) Not eligible for sale under exemption provisions permitting sales without registration to accredited investors or qualified purchasers;
(b) Not eligible for the transaction exemption from registration for non-issuer transactions by a registered broker-dealer;
(c) Not eligible for registration under the simplified small corporate offering registration (SCOR) form available in many states;
(d) Not eligible for the "solicitations of interest" exception to securities registration requirements available in many states;
(e) Not permitted to be registered or exempted from registration, and thus not permitted to be sold in the state under any circumstances.
Virtually all 50 states have adopted one or more of these limitations, or other limitations or restrictions affecting the sale or resale of stock of blank check companies or securities sold in "blind pool" offerings or "cheap stock" issued to promoters or others. Specific limitations on such offerings have been adopted in:
Alaska
Nevada
Tennessee
Arkansas
New Mexico
Texas
California
Ohio
Utah
Delaware
Oklahoma
Vermont
Florida
Oregon
Washington
Georgia
Pennsylvania
Idaho
Rhode Island
Indiana
South Carolina
Nebraska
South Dakota
Any secondary trading market which may develop, may only be conducted in those jurisdictions where an applicable exemption is available or where the shares have been registered.
20. Our Common Stock will be subject to significant restriction on resale due to
federal penny stock restrictions.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted rules that regulate broker or dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the Nasdaq system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange system). The penny stock rules require a broker or dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker or dealer also must provide the customer with bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker or dealer, and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. The penny stock rules also require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from such rules, the broker or dealer must make a special written determination that a penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction.
These disclosure requirements will have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in any secondary market for our stock, and accordingly, shareholders of our Common Stock will find it difficult to sell their securities, if at all.
ITEM 2. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Selected Financial Data
The Company was organized on March 6, 2014 and therefore no significant historical financial information exists. The Company’s statement of operations for the period from March 6, 2014 (inception) through December 31, 2014, and for the six months ended June 30, 2015, reflect the following:
To Dec 31, 2014
6 Months to June 30, 2015
Revenues
0
0
Expenses
258
4,661
Profit (Loss)
(258)
(4,661)
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
1) Liquidity: The Company had no cash and no liquid instruments at December 31, 2014. It is anticipated that we will incur nominal expenses in the implementation of the business plan described herein. Because we have no cash with which to pay these anticipated expenses, the two officers and directors of the Company have agreed to pay these charges with their personal funds, as interest free loans to the Company or as capital contributions. However, this is a voluntary agreement; our two officers and directors are not contractually obligated to pay these expenses. No loans had been made as of December 31, 2014, however, as of June 30, 2015 an officer had made an interest free loan to the Company in the amount of $4,500.
2) Capital Resources: As noted above, the Company has no capital resources but will rely upon interest free loans or capital contributions from our two officers and directors to meet its needs.
3) Results of Operations: As noted above, the Company was recently organized and has conducted no operations other than organizational efforts and the preparation of this Form 10 and the audit of its financial statements.
4) Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements: The Company has no off balance sheet arrangements.
Information about Market Risk
The Company is not subject to fluctuations in interest rates, currency exchange rates, or other financial market risks. Our two officers and directors have agreed to extend loans to the Company as needed to meet obligations, however these will be interest free. The Company has not made any sales, purchases, or commitments with foreign entities which would expose it to currency risks.
ITEM 3. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
We presently utilize minimal office space at 6136 Mission Gorge Road, Suite 111, San Diego, California. This space is provided to the Company by our president on a rent free basis, and it is anticipated that this arrangement will remain until such time as the Company successfully consummates a merger, acquisition or other business combination. Management believes that this arrangement will meet the Company's needs for the foreseeable future.
ITEM 4. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(a) Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners.
The following table sets forth the security and beneficial ownership for each class of our equity securities for any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than five (5%) percent of the Company.
Name and
Address of
Amount of
Beneficial
Shares
Percent
Title of Class
Owner
Owned
of Class
____________________________________________________________________________
Common
Daniel Masters
2,000,000
77.22%
6136 Mission Gorge Road
Suite 111,
San Diego, California
The remaining 590,000 shares of the Company's outstanding common stock are held by 46 persons, no one of which is known to be the beneficial owner of five percent (5%) or more of the Company’s common shares. There are, as of the date hereof, a total of 2,590,000 common shares issued and outstanding and no preferred shares issued or outstanding.
(b) Security Ownership of Management.
The following table sets forth the ownership for each class of equity securities of the Company owned beneficially and of record by all of our directors and officers.
Name and
Address of
Amount of
Beneficial
Shares
Percent
Title of Class
Owner
Owned
of Class
______________________________________________________________________________
Common
Daniel Masters
2,000,000
77.22%
6136 Mission Gorge Road
Suite 111,
San Diego, California
Common
Howard Behling
10,000
0.39%
1033 B Ave. #101
Coronado, CA 92118
Common
All Officers and
2,000,000
77.61%
Directors as a Group
(two [2] individuals)
ITEM 5. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Our directors and officers (and promoters, affiliates and control persons) are as follows:
Name
Age
Position
__________________________________________________
Daniel Masters
70
President/Director
Howard Behling
67
Secretary/Treasurer/Director
The above listed officers and directors will serve until the next annual meeting of the shareholders or until their death, resignation, retirement, removal, or disqualification, or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Vacancies in the existing Board of Directors are filled by majority vote of the remaining Directors. Officers of the Company serve at the will of the Board of Directors. There are no agreements or understandings for any officer or director to resign at the request of another person and no officer or director is acting on behalf of or will act at the direction of any other person.
Resumes
Daniel Masters, age 70, has been President and a Director of the Company since March 2014. He is also an attorney practicing business law with an emphasis on corporate reorganizations. From December 2010 to February 2013 he was Secretary, Treasurer, a Director and a controlling shareholder of Retail Spicy Gourmet, Inc. The Company changed its name in February 2013 to Golden Edge Entertainment, Inc. as part of a change in business and a change in control. Mr. Masters continued to serve as Secretary, Treasurer, a Director and a controlling shareholder until February 2015 when there was a second change in control of the company and he resigned all of his positions. He sold all but approximately 15,000 of his shares in February 2015. He was paid a total of $75,000 for his work with this company and the sale of his shares. All periodic filings due when Mr. Masters was an officer were timely filed. The company was similar to BIM Homes in that shares in the company were issued to creditors in bankruptcy and in that it was once a shell company, although it ceased to be a shell company in February 2013 when it entered the music recording and distribution business; it is still in the music business but under new management. From March 2010 to December 2014 Mr. Masters was the President, a Director and a controlling shareholder of MedBook World, Inc. and since December 2014 he has been Secretary, Treasurer, a Director and a controlling shareholder of this company. He has been paid $78,000 for his work with this company through the date of this filing. All periodic filings due when Mr. Masters was President, that is all filings due between March 2010 and December 2014, were timely filed, however there have been no filings since December 16, 2015. Mr. Masters’ successor as President of MedBook World elected not to file the company’s 10-K and 10-Qs when due but he has stated that he intends to file them in the near future, and Mr. Masters is currently working with the President and the auditors to bring the company current. The company was similar to BIM Homes in that shares in the company were issued to creditors in bankruptcy and in that it is a shell company. From December 2010 to February 2012 Mr. Masters was Secretary, Treasurer, a Director, and a controlling shareholder of Organic Spice Imports, Inc. He sold all but approximately 15,000 of his shares in February 2012 and resigned his positions at the same time, all in connection with a change in control of the company. He was paid a total of $44,475 for his work with this company and the sale of his shares. All periodic filings due when Mr. Masters was an officer were timely filed. The company was similar to BIM Homes in that shares in the company were issued to creditors in bankruptcy and in that it was once a shell company, although it ceased to be a shell company in February 2012 and began providing interactive digital media software and services to advertisers. From December 2010 to February 2013 Mr. Masters served as Secretary, Treasurer, a Director and a controlling shareholder of Spicy Gourmet Manufacturing, Inc. The Company changed its name in October 2012 to BullsNBears.com, Inc. in connection with a change in control and Mr. Masters resigned his positions as Secretary and Treasurer at that time, however he continued to serve as a Director until September 25, 2015 when he resigned from the Board. He sold or retired all but approximately 65,000 of his shares and was paid a total of $50,000 for his work with this company and the sale of his shares through the date of this filing. Subsequent to Mr. Masters’ resignation as an officer, and during the time he continued to serve as a Director, the Company was late on certain periodic filings and is currently delinquent on the filing of its June 30, 2015 10-Q. Although Mr. Masters has resigned as a Director he continues to urge the President to comply with filing obligations and he is informed the company will file the delinquent 10-Q on or before October 5, 2015. The company was similar to BIM Homes in that shares in the company were issued to creditors in bankruptcy and in that it was once a shell company, although it ceased to be a shell company in October 2012 and began offering a variety of products and services for members of the financial market community including quotation platforms and edgarizing and other issuer services for small cap public companies. Before establishing his current law practice in 2002, Mr. Masters served as an independent investment banker and corporate finance consultant from 1990 to 2002. Between 1978 and 1989 he worked as an investment banker with L.F. Thompson & Co. and at Capital Technology Group; as Vice President for Finance with the Trilon Group, a private holding company with over a billion dollars in assets; and as President of Golden Gate Capital, a venture capital group. Prior to 1978 Mr. Masters held positions as a legislative aid on the staff of the U.S. Congress and as executive assistant to the President of the University of California. Mr. Masters received his Bachelor of Arts Degree (A.B.) from Harvard University and a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) from Thomas Jefferson School of Law where he served on the Editorial Board of the Law Review. Mr. Masters was initially chosen as a Director of the Company because he represented PSD in its successful bankruptcy reorganization. He has remained a Director because his experience in corporate law and business development allow him to provide valuable legal and business advice to the Company.
Howard Behling, age 68, has been Secretary, Treasurer, and a Director of the Company since June 1, 2015. From June 2012 to January 2014 Mr. Behling was Vice President and a Director of Nevada Health Scan, Inc. He was paid $10,000 for his work with this company and retains stock in that company. All periodic filings due when Mr. Behling was an officer were timely filed. The company was similar to BIM Homes in that shares in the company were issued to creditors in bankruptcy and in that it was once a shell company, although the bankruptcy preceded Mr. Behling’s affiliation with the company by four years and it ceased to be a shell company in June 2012 when Mr. Behling became affiliated with it. Since 2005 Mr. Behling has been, and continues to be, an independent business consultant. Most of his clients have been new corporations in their early development stages. For the past three years he has been consulting with healthcare providers in Baja California on medical tourism from the United States. From June, 2012 until January, 2014 Mr. Behling was Vice President and a Director of Nevada Health Scan, Inc., a facilitator of medical tourism from the U.S. to Mexico. From 2000 to 2005 Mr. Behling was the Chairman and later President of AmeraMex International Inc., an international heavy equipment dealer. From 1997 through 1999 he was President and director of Veritec, Inc., an electronic identification company, and from 1989 to 1997 he was President of HOMETREND, Inc., the first public real estate franchise company in the United States. Between 1972 and 1989 Mr. Behling was employed as a stockbroker, first at E. F. Hutton & Co., then at Prudential Securities, and finally at Merrill Lynch as a vice president. He earned his B.A. in Business Administration from California State University at Fullerton. Mr. Behling was chosen as a director for his experience as an officer and director of other companies.
Other Offerings
Daniel Masters is currently Secretary, Treasurer and a Director of MedBook World, Inc. MedBook World is a shell company. He is also the President, Treasurer and Director of Three Shades For Everybody, Inc., a company in the business of selling art and collectibles. It's primary asset is a collection of signed, numbered, lithographs by actor Red Skelton. Mr. Masters also serves as a Director of BullsNBears.com, Inc., a company which is developing a website for the delivery of financial information and trading simulations for investors. Howard Behling is not currently a director or officer of any other publicly traded company, however he was a director and officer of Nevada Health Scan, Inc., an SEC registrant, from June 2012 until January 2014.
Conflicts of Interest
As noted above, the Company’s two officers and directors have agreed that they will pay the Company’s anticipated operating expenses with their personal funds, making interest free loans to the Company or capital contributions. To the extent they have made loans to the Company, the only opportunity which they have for repayment of these loans will be from a prospective merger or acquisition candidate. This may result in a conflict of interest as the officers may prefer a merger candidate which will repay their loans over one which will not.
Also as noted above, the Company’s President, Mr. Masters, is an officer of another company, MedBook World, seeking a merger or acquisition. Thus a potential conflict of interest exists between these companies. Mr. Masters has agreed to disclose to the Boards of both companies any discussions he may be involved in with a possible merger or acquisition candidate. Beyond that, the Company has not adopted any policy for dealing with this potential conflict of interest.
Also as noted above, the Company’s two officers and directors have other employment, in the case of Mr. Masters as an attorney and in the case of Mr. Behling as a consultant. These other businesses are not seeking mergers or acquisitions and, consequently, there are no known potential conflicts of interest in their employment, however there is a potential conflict of interest in the time which the officers and directors devote to this Company and to their other employment. We do not currently have an agreement as to the amount of time that will be devoted to the Company’s affairs, however our two officers and directors have stated that they will devote such time as they believe necessary to seeking out potential business combination targets for the Company, and they currently expect to devote approximately five hours per week to this search after this registration statement becomes effective.
ITEM 6.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The table below sets forth the compensation earned by our officers and directors since inception, March 6, 2014.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Stock All Other
Name & Principal Position
Year Salary Bonus Awards Compensation Total
------------------------------------ ------- -------- --------- ----------- ---------------- ----------
Konstantin Zecevic
2014 0 0 0 0 $ 0
President, CEO, Director
Daniel Masters
2014 0 0 $ 200 0 $ 200
President, CEO, Director
Neither of our two current officers and directors has received any cash compensation for services rendered to the Company since its inception, nor did our former officer and director receive any compensation. Our President, Mr. Masters, received 2,000,000 shares of stock in exchange for his costs and services in organizing and incorporating the Company in 2014. The shares were valued at par value or $0.0001 per share. Our Secretary/Treasurer, Mr. Behling, received 10,000 shares of stock in June 2015 in exchange for his services. These shares were also valued at par value or $0.0001 per share. There are no agreements in place or contemplated to provide additional compensation to any officer or director.
Neither of our two directors or officers will receive any finders fee, either directly or indirectly, as a result of their respective efforts to implement the Company's business plan outlined herein and/or identify or negotiate a merger or acquisition for the Company.
We have no retirement, pension, profit sharing, stock option or insurance programs or other similar programs for the benefit of our two officers and directors, and we have no employees.
ITEM 7. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
Our President, Mr. Masters, received 2,000,000 shares of stock in exchange for his costs and services in organizing and incorporating the Company. The shares were valued at par value or $0.0001 per share. Our Secretary/Treasurer, Mr. Behling, received 10,000 shares of stock in exchange for his services. These shares were also valued at par value or $0.0001 per share. On June 30, 2015 Mr. Masters made an interest free, three year convertible loan to the Company. The Note is due on June 30, 2018. The debt can be converted to equity on the rate of one cent of debt for one share of common stock at any time at the election of Mr. Masters, the lender. There have been no other related party transactions, or any other transactions or relationships required to be disclosed. There are no promoters except to the extent the two officers and directors may be considered promoters because of their involvement in the Company’s organization, in the case of the President, and the Company’s management, in the case of both officers and directors.
The two officers and directors of the Company have agreed to provide the necessary funds, without interest, for the Company to comply with the 1934 Act provided that the lender is an officer and director of the Company when the obligation is incurred. All advances are interest-free and there is no contractual obligation requiring the two officers and directors to provide these funds.
ITEM 8.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
There is no litigation pending or threatened by or against the Company.
ITEM 9. MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
(a) Market Price.
There is no established public trading market for our Common Stock at present and there has been no trading market in the past. We do not have a trading symbol. There is no assurance that a trading market will ever develop or, if such a market does develop, that it will continue. The Company intends to request a broker-dealer to make application to Finra to have the Company's securities traded on the OTC market, however there is no assurance that a broker-dealer will agree to make such application or, if one does, that Finra will provide us with a symbol. If Finra does provide us with a symbol, allowing our shares to be traded on the OTC market, it is highly unlikely that our shares will be traded on any more senior market or exchange in the foreseeable future, since such markets, in addition to their other requirements, require that a reverse merger company’s shares have traded for at least one year in the OTC market following the filing with the Commission of all required information concerning the transaction which caused the company to no longer be a shell before it can apply for listing on a senior market or exchange.
The Securities and Exchange Commission adopted Rule 15g-9, which established the definition of a "penny stock," for purposes relevant to the Company, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require: (i) that a broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks; and (ii) the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased. In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must (i) obtain financial information and investment experience and objectives of the person; and (ii) make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and that person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks. The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the Commission relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form, (i) sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and (ii) that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction. Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stock in both public offering and in secondary trading, and about commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.
(b) Holders.
There are forty-seven (47) shareholders of record of the Company's Common Stock. Forty-five (45) of these shareholders received their shares, a total of 580,000 shares, as a result of the bankruptcy of Pacific Shores Development, Inc. In that case the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California ordered certain shares of the Company’s stock to be distributed to the creditors of Pacific Shores Development, Inc. The shares were distributed under an exemption from registration provided by Section 1145(a) of Title 11 of the U.S. Code (the Bankruptcy Code). While this is a complete exemption, allowing the shares to be freely traded, 500,000 of the 580,000 shares were distributed to administrative creditors who agreed that their shares would not be sold to the public unless the company had filed with the SEC to become a reporting issuer and the Company was current in its reporting obligations.
While the Company and its counsel believe that the current Form 10 filing fulfills the Company’s obligation, allowing these shares to be freely tradable provided the Company is current with its reporting obligations at the time of any sale, certain staff members of the SEC initially took the position that these shares should be restricted until they could be traded in reliance on Rule 144(i). The Company and its counsel have taken the position that the shares are not so restricted because, 1) the court ordered Plan of Reorganization specifically states that these shares are “issued pursuant to Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code,” and 2) the published position of the SEC is that shares issued pursuant to Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code are not restricted. (“Question 128.03: Are securities that are received pursuant to Section 1145(a) of the Bankruptcy Code deemed restricted securities? Answer: No. Securities received pursuant to a Bankruptcy Code proceeding under the circumstances described in Section 1145(a) of the Bankruptcy Code would not be deemed restricted securities because they would have been received in a “public offering” under Section 1145(c) of the Code.” [Jan. 26, 2009])
The remaining two (2) shareholders, who are also officers of the Company, received their shares, a total of 2,010,000 shares, subsequent to the bankruptcy and those shares are restricted under Rule 144(i). Rule 144(i)(1) prohibits the use of Rule 144 for sales of restricted stock into the public market if the issuing company is or has been a shell company, unless the requirements of Rule 144(i)(2) are satisfied. Rule 144(i)(2) permits the use of Rule 144 by stockholders of an issuing company that has previously been but is not now a shell company if the issuing company has been filing reports with the SEC for one year that contain information about its current operating business activities and it is current in its reporting obligations at the time of the proposed sale in reliance on Rule 144.
(c) Dividends.
The Company has not paid any cash dividends to date, and has no plans to do so in the immediate future.
(d) Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.
The Company has not authorized the issuance of any securities under any compensation plan.
ITEM 10. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES.
(a) Securities issued in bankruptcy.
580,000 shares of our common stock were distributed to 45 shareholders by order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California as part of the confirmed Plan of Reorganization of Pacific Shores Development, Inc. (“PSD” or the “Debtor”). In 2005 PSD established BIM Homes LLC as a wholly owned subsidiary to build and sell low cost single family homes on in-fill lot sites. The real estate crash and the recession of 2008 made it impossible for PSD and for BIM Homes LLC to obtain the financing needed to carry on its projects. In 2010 PSD filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The Court ordered the incorporation of the Issuer and ordered the Issuer’s securities to be distributed to creditors of the Debtor in partial satisfaction of their claims against the Debtor and in order to enhance the creditors’ opportunity for recovery.
2,500,000 warrants to purchase shares of our common stock were also distributed to creditors of the Debtor as part of the confirmed Plan of Reorganization. The warrants consist of 500,000 “A Warrants” each convertible into one share of common stock at an exercise price of $4.00; 500,000 “B Warrants” each convertible into one share of common stock at an exercise price of $5.00; 500,000 “C Warrants” each convertible into one share of common stock at an exercise price of $6.00; 500,000 “D Warrants” each convertible into one share of common stock at an exercise price of $7.00; and 500,000 “E Warrants” each convertible into one share of common stock at an exercise price of $8.00. All warrants are currently exercisable and may be exercised at any time prior to August 30, 2016.
The issuance of the 580,000 shares of common stock and the 2,500,000 warrants to purchase a total of 2,500,000 shares of common stock were issued in exchange for claims against the estate of PSD and were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, because they were issued under section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code (Title 11 of the U.S. Code).
(b) Securities issued in a private placement.
On March 6, 2014 the Company issued 2,000,000 restricted shares of its common stock to its President and Director, Daniel Masters, for organizational costs and services at par value (0.0001 per share) for total consideration of $200. On June 1, 2015 The Company issued 10,000 restricted shares of its common stock to its Secretary, Treasurer, and Director Howard Behling, also for services at par value (0.0001 per share). We relied upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended for the above issuances. We believed that Section 4(2) was available because:
- The issuance involved no underwriter, underwriting discounts or commissions;
- We placed restrictive legends on all certificates issued;
- No sales were made by general solicitation or advertising;
- Sales were made only to accredited investors who are Company officers.
In connection with the above transactions, we provided the following to the investor:
- Access to all our books and records.
- Access to all material contracts and documents relating to our operations.
- The opportunity to obtain any additional information, to the extent we possessed such information, necessary to verify the accuracy of the information to which the investors were given access.
ITEM 11. DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED.
The Company's authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 Common Shares, par value $0.0001 per share, and 20,000,000 Preferred Shares, par value $0.0001 per share. We have no other class of equity securities authorized, and we have no debt securities presently authorized. We have 2,590,000 Common Shares issued and outstanding as of the date of this filing and no Preferred Shares issued and outstanding as of the date of this filing. We also have warrants outstanding which are convertible into an additional 2,500,000 Common Shares. The warrants are currently exercisable and may be exercised at any time prior to August 30, 2016.
All shares of our Common Stock have equal voting rights and, when validly issued and outstanding, are entitled to one vote per share in all matters to be voted upon by shareholders. The shares of Common Stock have no preemptive, subscription, conversion or redemption rights and may be issued only as fully-paid and non-assessable shares. Cumulative voting in the election of directors is not permitted, which means that the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock represented at any meeting at which a quorum is present will be able to elect the entire Board of Directors if they so choose and, in such event, the holders of the remaining shares of Common Stock will not be able to elect any directors. In the event of liquidation of the Company, each shareholder is entitled to receive a proportionate share of the Company's assets available for distribution to shareholders after the payment of liabilities and after distribution in full of preferential amounts, if any. All shares of the Company's Common Stock issued and outstanding are fully-paid and non-assessable. Holders of the Common Stock are entitled to share pro rata in dividends and distributions with respect to the Common Stock, as may be declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor. Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue our Preferred Stock in series and to fix the designation, powers, preferences, and rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications, limitations, or restrictions thereof.
In addition to the 2,590,000 Common Shares which we currently have outstanding there are 2,500,000 warrants outstanding, each of which is convertible into one share of our Common Stock. These
consist of 500,000 “A Warrants” each convertible in to one share of common stock at an exercise price of $4.00; 500,000 “B Warrants” each convertible in to one share of common stock at an exercise price of $5.00; 500,000 “C Warrants” each convertible in to one share of common stock at an exercise price of $6.00; 500,000 “D Warrants” each convertible in to one share of common stock at an exercise price of $7.00; and 500,000 “E Warrants” each convertible in to one share of common stock at an exercise price of $8.00. All of the warrants are currently exercisable; they will expire if unexercised on August 30, 2016 unless extended by vote of the Board of Directors. All of these warrants were issued to creditors of Pacific Shores Development, Inc. by order of the Bankruptcy Court as part of the Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of that corporation. The warrants were distributed under an exemption from registration provided by Section 1145 of Title 11 of the U.S. Code (the Bankruptcy Code).
The exercise price for the above described Warrants may be reduced, but not increased, by vote of the Board of Directors of the Corporation, however, the exercise price may not be reduced below the highest of: a) the book value of a share, b) the par value of a share, or c) eighty percent (80%) of the closing bid price for a share on the business day prior to the directors’ vote if the stock is publicly traded. These Warrants also have a cashless exercise provision which allows a holder to convert these Warrants, in whole or in part, into that number of shares of Common Stock of the Company determined by dividing (a) the aggregate fair market value of the shares of Common Stock of the Company which would be issuable upon exercise of the Warrants to be converted, as determined by the most recent closing sale on the primary market for the Company’s stock on the date of conversion, minus the aggregate Warrant exercise price of the shares which would be issuable upon exercise of the Warrants by (b) the said fair market value of one share of the Common Stock of the Company. If at the time a cashless warrant conversion is sought the Company’s shares are neither listed nor admitted to trading on any exchange or market, then the fair market value of shares shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company after taking into account such factors as the Board of Directors of the Company shall deem appropriate
ITEM 12. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.
Except for acts or omissions which involve intentional misconduct, fraud or known violation of law, there shall be no personal liability of a director or officer to the Company, or to its stockholders for damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer. The Company may indemnify any person for expenses incurred, including attorneys fees, in connection with their good faith acts if they reasonably believe such acts are in and not opposed to the best interests of the Company and for acts for which the person had no reason to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. The Company may indemnify the officers and directors for expenses incurred in defending a civil or criminal action, suit or proceeding as they are incurred in advance of the final disposition of the action, suit or proceeding, upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director or officer to repay the amount of such expenses if it is ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction in which the action or suit is brought that such person is not fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification for such expenses.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, may be permitted to officers, directors or persons controlling the Company pursuant to the foregoing, we have been informed that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and is therefore unenforceable.
ITEM 13. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
The Company’s audited financial statements are attached hereto.
ITEM 14. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
There are no disagreements with the findings of our accountant.
ITEM 15. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.
The Company’s audited financial statements as of December 31, 2014 as well as its unaudited financial statements as of March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015 are filed herewith.
Exhibit: