Fair Value Measurement | Fair Value Measurement The following tables presents assets and liabilities measured at fair value: December 31, 2021 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets Loans $ — $ — $ 252,477 $ 252,477 Notes receivable and residual certificates — — 8,288 8,288 Loan servicing assets — — 18,388 18,388 Total assets $ — $ — $ 279,153 $ 279,153 Liabilities Loan servicing liabilities $ — $ — $ 8,780 $ 8,780 Trailing fee liabilities — — 4,315 4,315 Total liabilities $ — $ — $ 13,095 $ 13,095 December 31, 2022 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets Loans $ — $ — $ 1,010,421 $ 1,010,421 Notes receivable and residual certificates — — 6,181 6,181 Loan servicing assets — — 36,467 36,467 Total assets $ — $ — $ 1,053,069 $ 1,053,069 Liabilities Loan servicing liabilities $ — $ — $ 3,968 $ 3,968 Trailing fee liabilities — — 4,852 4,852 Total liabilities $ — $ — $ 8,820 $ 8,820 Financial instruments are categorized in the fair value hierarchy based on the significance of unobservable factors in the overall fair value measurement. Since the Company’s loans, notes receivable and residual certificates, loan servicing assets and liabilities, and trailing fee liabilities do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices, the Company uses significant unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of these assets and liabilities. There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the years presented. Loans Loans included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets are classified as either held-for-sale or held-for-investment based on the Company’s intent and ability to sell the loans prior to maturity. Loan held-for-investment are generally held for research and development purposes, primarily in support of new products and expansion into new categories of borrowers. From time to time the Company transfers loans between classifications based on changes in the Company’s intent. As of December 31, 2021, $142.7 million and $109.8 million of loans held on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets were classified as held-for-sale and held-for-investment, respectively. As of December 31, 2022, $882.8 million and $127.6 million of loans held on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets were classified as held-for-sale and held-for-investment, respectively. Valuation Methodology Loans held-for-sale and held-for-investment are measured at estimated fair value using a discounted cash flow model. The fair valuation methodology considers projected prepayments and historical defaults, losses and recoveries to project future losses and net cash flows on loans. Net cash flows are discounted using an estimate of market rates of return. The fair value of these loans also includes accrued interest. Significant Inputs and Assumptions The following table presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for the Company’s Level 3 fair value measurements for loans held-for-investment and held-for-sale: December 31, 2021 December 31, 2022 Minimum Maximum Weighted-Average (2) Minimum Maximum Weighted-Average (2) Discount rate 3.42 % 16.49 % 7.29 % 6.36 % 22.28 % 11.87 % Credit risk rate (1) 0.08 % 55.79 % 17.98 % 0.01 % 93.09 % 16.93 % Prepayment rate (1) 8.70 % 88.12 % 40.35 % 0.08 % 93.43 % 40.49 % (1) Expressed as a percentage of the original principal balance of the loans. (2) Unobservable inputs were weighted by relative fair value. Discount rates –The discount rates are rates of return used to discount future expected cash flows to arrive at a present value, which represents the fair value. The discount rates used for the projected net cash flows are the Company’s estimates of the rates of return that market participants would require when investing in these financial instruments with cash flows dependent on credit quality of the related loan. A risk premium component is implicitly included in the discount rates to reflect the amount of compensation market participants require due to the uncertainty inherent in the instruments’ cash flows resulting from risks such as credit and liquidity. Credit risk rates –The credit risk rates are an estimate of the net cumulative principal payments that will not be repaid over the entire life of a financial instrument. The credit risk rates are expressed as a percentage of the original principal amount of the instrument. The estimated net cumulative loss represents the sum of the net losses estimated to occur each month of the life of the instrument, net of the average recovery expected to be received. Prepayment rates –Prepayment rates are an estimate of the cumulative principal prepayments that will occur over the entire life of a loan as a percentage of the original principal amount of the loan. The assumption regarding cumulative prepayments impact the projected balances and expected terms of the loans. The above inputs are similarly used in estimating fair value of related financial instruments. Refer to the Assets related to Securitization Transactions section below for more information. Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Input Sensitivity The below table presents the sensitivity of the loans held-for-sale and held-for-investment to adverse changes in key assumptions used in the valuation model as of December 31, 2021 and 2022, respectively. December 31, 2021 2022 Fair value of loans $ 252,477 $ 1,010,421 Discount rates 100 basis point increase (3,392) (11,979) 200 basis point increase (6,709) (23,720) Expected credit loss rates on underlying loans 10% adverse change (3,959) (11,927) 20% adverse change (7,927) (23,852) Expected prepayment rates 10% adverse change (239) (2,284) 20% adverse change (512) (4,530) Rollforward of Level 3 Fair Values The following tables include a rollforward of the loans classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: Loans Held-for- Loans Held-for-Investment Total Fair value at December 31, 2020 $ 60,232 $ 18,228 $ 78,460 Purchases of loans (1) 219,128 159,398 378,526 Sale of loans (1) (123,370) (40,602) (163,972) Purchase of loans for immediate resale (1) 8,713,476 — 8,713,476 Immediate resale of loans (1) (8,713,476) — (8,713,476) Repayments received (1) (10,578) (22,612) (33,190) Changes in fair value recorded in earnings (3,284) (5,770) (9,054) Changes in accrued interest and other charges 557 1,150 1,707 Fair value at December 31, 2021 $ 142,685 $ 109,792 $ 252,477 Reclassification of loans (1) 103,677 (103,677) — Purchases of loans (1) 1,807,787 149,344 1,957,131 Sale of loans (1) (914,369) — (914,369) Purchase of loans for immediate resale (1) 5,992,148 — 5,992,148 Immediate resale of loans (1) (5,992,148) — (5,992,148) Repayments received (1) (180,135) (15,194) (195,329) Changes in fair value recorded in earnings (85,567) (14,215) (99,782) Changes in accrued interest and other charges 8,732 1,561 10,293 Fair value at December 31, 2022 $ 882,810 $ 127,611 $ 1,010,421 _________ (1) Represents the unpaid principal balance. The following table presents the aggregate fair value and aggregate principal outstanding of all loans and loans that were 90 days or more past due included in the consolidated balance sheets: Loans Loans > 90 Days Past Due December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, 2021 2022 2021 2022 Outstanding principal balance $ 277,228 $ 1,047,714 $ 1,979 $ 9,006 Net fair value and accrued interest adjustments (24,751) (37,293) (1,692) (7,006) Fair value (1) $ 252,477 $ 1,010,421 $ 287 $ 2,000 _________ (1) Includes $50.1 million and $397.7 million of auto loans as of December 31, 2021 and 2022, respectively, of which an immaterial amount is 90 days or more past due for each year presented. The Company places loans on non-accrual status at 120 days past due. Any accrued interest recorded in relation to these loans is reversed in the respective period. The Company charges-off loans no later than 120 days past due. Assets related to Securitization Transactions As of December 31, 2021 and 2022, the Company held notes receivable and residual certificates with an aggregate fair value of $8.3 million and $6.2 million, respectively within other assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The balances consist of securitization notes and residual certificates retained from securitization transactions. Valuation Methodology The discounted cash flow methodology, which is used to estimate the fair value of notes receivable and residual certificates, uses the same projected net cash flows as their related loans. This model uses inputs that are inherently judgmental and reflect the Company’s best estimates of the assumptions a market participant would use to calculate fair value. Significant Inputs and Assumptions The following table presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for the Company’s Level 3 fair value measurements of assets related to securitization transactions: December 31, 2021 December 31, 2022 Minimum Maximum Weighted-Average (2) Minimum Maximum Weighted-Average (2) Notes receivable and residual certificates Discount rate 4.96 % 15.72 % 6.78 % 8.42 % 22.27 % 12.79 % Credit risk rate (1) 0.04 % 50.69 % 18.47 % 0.59 % 50.69 % 18.43 % Prepayment rate (1) 15.60 % 36.08 % 27.82 % 10.90 % 88.73 % 42.66 % _________ (1) Expressed as a percentage of the original principal balance of the loans underlying the financial instruments. (2) Unobservable inputs were weighted by relative fair value. Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Input Sensitivity The securities issued in the securitization transactions are senior or subordinated based on the waterfall criteria of loan payments to each security class, with the residual interest (the “residual certificates”) issued being the first to absorb credit losses in accordance with the waterfall criteria. Accordingly, the residual certificates are the most sensitive to adverse changes in credit risk rates. Depending on the specific securitization, a hypothetical increase in the credit risk rate of 10% to 20% would result in significant decreases in the fair value of the residual certificates. On average, a hypothetical increase in the credit risk rate under a discounted cash flow methodology of 20% would result in a 27% decrease in the fair value of the residual certificates. The fair value of the securities are sensitive to adverse changes in discount rates, which represent estimates of the rates of return that institutional investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar risk and return characteristics. On average, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in discount rates under a discounted cash flow methodology results in a decrease in fair value of the securities (including securitization notes and residual certificates) of 0.69% and 1.10% as of December 31, 2021 and 2022, respectively. On average, a hypothetical 200 basis point increase in discount rates results in a decrease in fair value of the securities (including securitization notes and residual certificates) of 1.37% and 2.18% as of December 31, 2021 and 2022, respectively. The fair value of securitization notes and residual certificates are not sensitive to adverse changes in expected prepayment rates as such changes would not result in a significant impact on the fair value as of December 31, 2021 and 2022. Rollforward of Level 3 Fair Values The following tables include a rollforward of the notes receivable and residual certificates related to securitization transactions classified by the Company within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: Notes Receivable and Residual Certificates Fair value at December 31, 2020 $ 19,074 Repayments and settlements (11,458) Changes in fair value recorded in earnings 672 Fair value at December 31, 2021 $ 8,288 Residual certificates retained under unconsolidated securitization transaction 4,680 Repayments and settlements (6,736) Changes in fair value recorded in earnings (51) Fair value at December 31, 2022 $ 6,181 Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities Valuation Methodology Loan servicing assets and liabilities are measured at estimated fair value using a discounted cash flow model. The cash flows in the valuation model represent the difference between the contractual servicing fees charged to institutional investors and an estimated market servicing rate. Since contractual servicing fees are generally based on the monthly unpaid principal balance of the underlying loans, the expected cash flows in the model incorporate estimates of net losses and prepayments. Significant Inputs and Assumptions The following table presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for the Company’s Level 3 fair value measurements for loan servicing assets and liabilities: December 31, 2021 December 31, 2022 Minimum Maximum Weighted-Average (2) Minimum Maximum Weighted-Average (2) Discount rate 13.00 % 20.00 % 17.69 % 13.00 % 20.00 % 17.20 % Credit risk rate (1) 0.03 % 52.78 % 18.36 % 0.03 % 91.76 % 16.22 % Market-servicing rate (3)(4)(5) 0.62 % 3.73 % 0.62 % 0.62 % 3.72 % 0.62 % Prepayment rate (1) 5.99 % 91.43 % 36.39 % 0.53 % 91.99 % 41.19 % _________ (1) Expressed as a percentage of the original principal balance of the loans underlying the servicing arrangement. (2) Unobservable inputs were weighted by relative fair value. (3) Excludes ancillary fees that would be passed on to a third-party servicer. (4) Expressed as a percentage of the outstanding principal balance of the loan. (5) Includes personal loans and auto loans. Discount rates –The discount rates are the Company’s estimate of the rates of return that market participants in servicing rights would require when investing in similar servicing rights. Discount rates for servicing rights on existing loans are adjusted to reflect the time value of money and a risk premium intended to reflect the amount of compensation market participants would require due to the uncertainty associated with these instruments’ cash flows. Credit risk rate s–The credit risk rates are the Company’s estimate of the net cumulative principal payments that will not be repaid over the entire life of a loan expressed as a percentage of the original principal amount of the loan. The assumption regarding net cumulative losses impact the projected balances and expected terms of the loans, which are used to project future servicing revenues. Market-servicing rates –Market-servicing rate is an estimated measure of adequate compensation for a market participant, if one was required. The rate is expressed as a fixed percentage of outstanding principal balance per annum. The estimate considers the profit that would be demanded in the marketplace to service the portfolio of outstanding loans subject to the Company’s servicing agreements. Prepayment rates –Prepayment rates are the Company’s estimate of the cumulative principal prepayments that will occur over the entire life of a loan as a percentage of the original principal amount of the loan. The assumption regarding cumulative prepayments impact the projected balances and expected terms of the loans, which are used to project future servicing revenues. Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Input Sensitivity The table below presents the fair value sensitivity of loan servicing assets and liabilities to adverse changes in key assumptions. The fair value of loan servicing assets and liabilities is not sensitive to adverse changes in discount rates as such changes would not result in a significant impact on the fair value as of December 31, 2021 and 2022, respectively. December 31, December 31, 2021 2022 Fair value of loan servicing assets $ 18,388 $ 36,467 Expected market-servicing rates 10% market-servicing rates increase (5,539) (9,989) 20% market-servicing rates increase (11,002) (19,950) December 31, December 31, 2021 2022 Fair value of loan servicing liabilities $ 8,780 $ 3,968 Expected market-servicing rates 10% market-servicing rates increase 5,357 2,303 20% market-servicing rates increase 10,788 4,640 Rollforward of Level 3 Fair Values The following tables present a rollforward of the loan servicing assets and liabilities classified by the Company within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: Loan Servicing Assets Loan Servicing Liabilities Fair value at December 31, 2020 $ 6,831 $ 8,254 Sale of loans 21,240 14,324 Changes in fair value recorded in earnings (9,683) (13,798) Fair value at December 31, 2021 $ 18,388 $ 8,780 Sale of loans 31,041 2,302 Changes in fair value recorded in earnings (12,962) (7,114) Fair value at December 31, 2022 $ 36,467 $ 3,968 Trailing Fee Liabilities The Company pays certain lending partners monthly trailing fees based on the amount and timing of principal and interest payments made by borrowers of the underlying loans. Significant inputs used for estimating the fair value of trailing fee liabilities included discount rates of 3.42% to 16.49% and credit risk rates of 0.08% to 55.79% as of December 31, 2021 and discount rates of 6.36% to 22.28% and credit risk rates of 0.01% to 93.09% as of December 31, 2022. The fair value sensitivity of trailing fee liabilities to adverse changes in key assumptions would not result in a material impact on the Company’s financial position. Rollforward of Level 3 Fair Values The following tables include a rollforward of trailing fee liabilities classified by the Company within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: Trailing Fee Liabilities Fair value at December 31, 2020 $ 1,276 Issuances 4,275 Repayments and settlements (1,240) Changes in fair value recorded in earnings 4 Fair value at December 31, 2021 $ 4,315 Issuances 3,898 Repayments and settlements (3,001) Changes in fair value recorded in earnings (360) Fair value at December 31, 2022 $ 4,852 |