Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 30, 2016 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Nature of Operations [Policy Text Block] | Nature of Operations first |
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Basis of Presentation 10 On July 30, 2015, March 14, 2016, March 14, 2016, Those combined financial statements included an allocation of expenses related to certain Integer corporate functions, including executive oversight, finance, legal, human resources, tax, information technology, product development, corporate procurement, and facilities. These expenses were charged to the Company on the basis of direct usage, when identifiable, with the remainder allocated primarily on a pro rata basis of estimated hours incurred, headcount, square footage, or other measures. The Company’s management considers the expense allocation methodology and results to be reasonable for all periods presented. However, these allocations are not indicative of the actual expenses that would have been incurred if the Company had been an independent publicly-traded company or of the costs the Company will incur in the future. Following the spin-off, Integer has continued to provide many of these services on a transitional basis for a fee. See Note 14 5 |
Liquidity and Capital Resources [Policy Text Block] | Liquidity and Capital Resources $75 $25 six two may |
Fiscal Period, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Fiscal Year End fifty two, fifty three December 31. 2016 2015 December 30, 2016 January 1, 2016, fifty two |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Use of Estimates |
Fair Value Measurement, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Fair Value Measurements . three Level 1 1 Level 2 Level 3 3 The availability of observable inputs can vary and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, the type of asset/liability, whether the asset/liability is established in the marketplace, and other characteristics particular to the valuation. To the extent that a valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even when market assumptions are not readily available, assumptions are required to reflect those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable and other current liabilities and accrued bonuses approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these items. Note 11 |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Cash and Cash Equivalents three |
Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Concentration of Credit Risk 2016, $3.1 25%) 2015, one 10% December 30, 2016 $0.3 10% may 13 |
Receivables, Trade and Other Accounts Receivable, Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $0.01 $0.06 2016 2015, Inventories first first $156,000 $0 2016 2015, may |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Property, Plant and Equipment, Net (“PP&E”) 7 40 3 8 3 10 The Company is a party to various operating lease agreements for buildings, machinery, and equipment. Lease expense includes the effect of escalation clauses, which are accounted for ratably over the lease term. Note 2 |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Amortizing Intangible Assets, Net 6 7 3 |
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Including Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Impairment of Long-Lived Assets may 50 Potential recoverability is measured by comparing the carrying amount of the asset or asset group to its related total future undiscounted cash flows. The projected cash flows for each asset or asset group considers multiple factors, including current revenue from existing customers, proceeds from the sale of the asset or asset group and expected profit margins giving consideration to historical and expected margins. If the carrying value is not recoverable, the asset or asset group is considered to be impaired. Impairment is measured by comparing the asset or asset group’s carrying amount to its fair value. When it is determined that useful lives of assets are shorter than originally estimated, and no impairment is present, the rate of depreciation is accelerated in order to fully depreciate the assets over their new shorter useful lives. |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Goodwill, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Goodwill Valuation $38.2 December 2013. January 1, 2016, 2015 one one 2016 two As a new public entity, the Company commenced its first fourth 2016. two two $38.2 two The Company tests its goodwill balances for impairment on the last day of each fiscal year, or more frequently if certain indicators are present or changes in circumstances, as described above, suggest that impairment may may first zero” two zero two two December 30, 2016, first two The implied fair value of goodwill for the reporting units was determined utilizing both the income approach, specifically the Discounted Cash Flow (“DCF”) method, and the market approach. The income approach calculates fair value by estimating the after-tax cash flows attributable to a reporting unit and then discounting these after-tax cash flows to a present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate. The market approach calculates fair value by analyzing market comparisons available. The Company believes that a combination of these approaches represents the most appropriate valuation technique for which sufficient data is available to determine the fair value of its reporting units. In applying the income approach, the Company makes assumptions about the amount and timing of future expected cash flows, terminal value growth rates and appropriate discount rates. The amount and timing of future cash flows within the DCF analysis is based on the Company’s most recent operational budgets, long -range strategic plans and other estimates. The terminal value growth rate of approximately 4 12 Upon completing the first 4.5% 34.1% Although the Company uses consistent methodologies in developing the assumptions and estimates underlying the fair value calculations used in its impairment tests, these estimates are uncertain by nature and can vary from actual results. The use of alternative valuation assumptions, including estimated revenue projections, growth rates, cash flows and discount rates could result in significant changes to our goodwill fair value estimates. The estimates used represent management's best estimates, which it believes to be reasonable, but future declines in business performance or relatively small changes in key assumptions may 500 500 9%. The following represents our goodwill balance by reportable segment. The prior period information has been restated to conform to the current presentation. Changes to goodwill during the years ended December 30, 2016 January 1, 2016 Nuvectra NeuroNexus Total Balance – January 2, 2015 Goodwill, gross $ 33,491 $ 4,691 $ 38,182 Accumulated impairment losses — — — Goodwill, net 33,491 4,691 38,182 Goodwill impairment charge — — — Balance – January 1, 2016 Goodwill, gross 33,491 4,691 38,182 Accumulated impairment losses — — — Goodwill, net 33,491 4,691 38,182 Goodwill impairment charge — — — Balance – December 30, 2016 Goodwill, gross 33,491 4,691 38,182 Accumulated impairment losses — — — Goodwill, net $ 33,491 $ 4,691 $ 38,182 |
Standard Product Warranty, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Warranty Reserve |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Revenue Recognition Service revenue is recognized as the services are performed. The Company’s development services are typically provided on a fixed-fee basis. The revenues for such longer duration projects are typically recognized using the proportional performance method. In using the proportional performance method, revenues are generally recorded based on the percentage of effort incurred to date on a contract relative to the estimated total expected contract effort. Significant judgment is required when estimating total contract effort and progress to completion on the arrangements as well as whether a loss is expected to be incurred on the contract. Management uses historical experience, project plans and an assessment of the risks and uncertainties inherent in the arrangements to establish these estimates. Various uncertainties may may |
Research and Development Expense, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Research, Development and Engineering Costs, Net (“RD&E”) |
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] | Stock-Based Compensation – The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of stock options granted. For service-based and nonmarket-based performance restricted stock unit awards, the fair market value of the award is determined based upon the closing value of the stock price on the grant date. Historically, for market-based performance restricted stock unit awards, the fair market value of the award was determined utilizing a Monte Carlo simulation model, which projected the value of Integer’s stock under numerous scenarios and determined the value of the award based upon the present value of those projected outcomes. The amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized is based on the portion of the awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Pre-vesting forfeiture estimates were estimated based upon historical data and are revised if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The total expense recognized over the vesting period will only be for those awards that ultimately vest, excluding market and nonmarket performance award considerations. Note 5 |
Insurance, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Insurance third March 14, 2016 14 |
Interest Expense and Income [Policy Text Block] | Interest Expense, Net $1.4 December 30, 2016. $0.1 December 30, 2016. 2015. |
Comprehensive Income, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Comprehensive Loss |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Income Taxes The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions using a more likely than not recognition threshold. The evaluation of uncertain tax positions is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in tax law, the measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in tax returns, the effective settlement of matters subject to audit, new audit activity and changes in facts or circumstances related to a tax position. The Company recognizes interest expense related to uncertain tax positions as Provision for Income Taxes. Penalties, if incurred, are recognized as a component of Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. These tax positions are evaluated on a quarterly basis. See Note 8 |
Subsequent Events, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Subsequent Events The Company considers events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but prior to the issuance of the financial statements to provide additional evidence relative to certain estimates or to identify matters that require additional disclosure. |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | In the normal course of business, management evaluates all new accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”), and other authoritative accounting bodies to determine the potential impact they may In August 2016, 2016 15, 230): 2016 15 eight December 15, 2017, first 2018 2016 15 In March 2016, 2016 09, 718, 2016 09 2016 09 December 15, 2016, In February 2016, 2016 02, 2016 02 2016 02 December 15, 2018 In January 2016, 2016 01, December 15, 2017, In July 2015, 2015 11, 330): first December 15, 2016, first 2017. 2015 11 In August 2014, 2014 15, 2014 15 one December 15, 2016. 2014 15 In May 2014, 2014 09, 2014 09 five two August 2015, 2015 14 2014 09 December 15, 2017, December 15, 2016. March 2016, 2016 08, 606): 2014 09. April 2016, 2016 10, 606): 2014 9. May 2016, 2016 11, 605) 815): 2014 09 2014 16 March 3, 2016 2016 11 two March 3, 2016 2016 11 605 December 15, 2017 815 December 15, 2015. May 2016, 2016 12, 606): 2014 9. |