COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Leases The Company’s principal facilities are located in Maynard, Massachusetts and Holmdel, New Jersey and are leased by the Company under non-cancelable operating leases that expire in February 2025, with respect to the Massachusetts facility, and December 2021, with respect to the New Jersey facility. The Company also leases office space in various locations with expiration dates between 2018 and 2021 . Several of the lease agreements include leasehold improvement incentives, escalating lease payments, renewal provisions and other provisions which require the Company to pay taxes, insurance and maintenance costs. All of the Company’s facility leases are accounted for as operating leases. Rent expense is recorded over each respective lease term on a straight-line basis. Rent expense was $1.2 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively, and $2.7 million and $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively. Future minimum lease payments due under these non-cancelable lease agreements as of June 30, 2017 , are as follows (in thousands): Amounts Remaining 2017 $ 1,674 2018 3,113 2019 3,047 2020 3,067 2021 3,039 Thereafter 7,387 Total $ 21,327 The Holmdel, New Jersey and Maynard, Massachusetts leases entered into during 2016 included tenant improvements which were partially funded by the Company. Under these lease agreements, the Company will not have title to the tenant improvements. Therefore, as the Company funded its portion of the improvements, it recorded a prepaid lease asset that will be amortized over the lease term. As of June 30, 2017 , the Company was committed to approximately $0.6 million of remaining tenant improvement costs related to these leases which is expected to be paid in the third quarter of 2017. Warranties The Company’s standard warranty obligation to its customers provides for repair or replacement of a defective product at the Company’s discretion for a period of time following purchase, generally between 12 and 24 months . Factors that affect the warranty obligation include product failure rates, material usage, and service delivery costs incurred in correcting product failures. In addition, from time to time, specific warranty accruals may be made if unforeseen technical problems arise. The estimated cost associated with fulfilling the Company’s warranty obligation to customers is recorded in cost of revenue. Changes in the Company’s product warranty liability, which is included as a component of accrued liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, are set forth in the table below (in thousands). The reserves below do not include reserves established as a result of the manufacturing process quality issue described below under the heading "Manufacturing Process Quality Reserve." Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 2016 2017 2016 Warranty reserve, beginning of period $ 2,113 $ 1,147 $ 2,158 $ 763 Provisions made to warranty reserve during the period 4,771 1,156 5,971 1,786 Charges against warranty reserve during the period (2,025 ) (997 ) (3,270 ) (1,243 ) Warranty reserve, end of period $ 4,859 $ 1,306 $ 4,859 $ 1,306 Manufacturing Process Quality Reserve In May 2017, the Company announced a quality issue at one of its three contract manufacturers that affected a portion of the approximate 1,300 AC400 units and 5,100 CFP units manufactured by the contract manufacturer over an approximate four month period (the "Quality Issue"). As a result of the Quality Issue, the Company established reserves to cover anticipated costs, including cost estimates for product repairs, rework of component inventory with the contract manufacturer and rescreening costs. The Quality Issue warranty reserve of $2.8 million was recorded as a component of accrued liabilities in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2017 . An additional $5.0 million was reserved against estimated affected inventory on-hand at the contract manufacturer and in-transit returns as of June 30, 2017 . The Company's estimates of the Quality Issue costs are subject to change as customers return the potentially affected units and final testing is performed. Legal Contingencies On January 22, 2016, ViaSat, Inc. filed a suit against the Company alleging, among other things, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and misappropriation of trade secrets. On February 19, 2016, the Company responded to ViaSat’s suit and alleged counterclaims against ViaSat including, among other things, patent misappropriation, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, misappropriation of trade secrets and unfair competition, which ViaSat denied in its response filed March 16, 2016. The lawsuit is still pending and discovery is ongoing. The Company is continuing to evaluate ViaSat’s claims, but based on the information available to the Company today, the Company currently believes that this suit will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business or its condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. On July 28, 2017, the Company filed a suit against ViaSat asserting commercial disparagement, libel, slander of title, unfair competition, intentional interference with advantageous relations and intentional interference with contractual relations. In addition, from time to time the Company may become involved in legal proceedings or be subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company currently believes that the final outcome of these ordinary course matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business or its condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on the Company because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors. Indemnification In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into various agreements containing standard indemnification provisions. The Company’s indemnification obligations under such provisions are typically in effect from the date of execution of the applicable agreement through the end of the applicable statute of limitations. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , the Company did not experience any losses related to these indemnification obligations. The Company does not expect significant claims related to these indemnification obligations, and consequently, has concluded that the fair value of these obligations is not material. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , no amounts have been accrued related to such indemnification provisions. |