This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment No. 2”) amends and supplements the Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9 (as amended or supplemented from time to time, this “Schedule 14D-9”) filed by Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Checkmate”), with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on May 2, 2022, relating to the tender offer by Scandinavian Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Purchaser”) and a wholly owned subsidiary of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a New York corporation (“Regeneron”), to purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Shares”), of Checkmate for a purchase price of $10.50 per Share in cash, to be paid to the seller without interest thereon and subject to reduction for any withholding taxes, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase, filed by Regeneron and Purchaser with the SEC on May 2, 2022 (as amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Offer to Purchase”), and in the related Letter of Transmittal, filed by Regeneron and Purchaser with the SEC on May 2, 2022 (as amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Letter of Transmittal,” which, together with the Offer to Purchase, constitute the “Offer”).
Except to the extent specifically provided in this Amendment No. 2, the information set forth in this Schedule 14D-9 remains unchanged. Capitalized terms used, but not otherwise defined, in this Amendment No. 2 shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this Schedule 14D-9. This Amendment No. 2 is being filed to reflect certain updates as reflected below.
Explanatory Note:
On May 5, 2022, a complaint was filed against Checkmate and its board of directors by a purported Checkmate shareholder in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York captioned Hopkins v. Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., 1:22-cv-02582. A similar complaint was filed in the same court on May 13, 2022 captioned Savage v. Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., 1:22-cv-02823. On May 12, 2022, a similar complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania captioned Whitfield v. Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., 2:22-cv-01860. The foregoing cases are referred to collectively as the “Merger Actions.” The Merger Actions generally allege that the Schedule 14D-9 misrepresents and/or omits certain purportedly material information relating to financial projections, the analyses performed by Checkmate’s financial advisor in connection with the Merger, and potential conflicts of interest of Checkmate’s officers and directors. The Merger Actions assert violations of Sections 14(d) and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 14d-9 promulgated thereunder, against all defendants (Checkmate and the Checkmate Board), and violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act against Checkmate’s directors. The Merger Actions seek, among other things, an injunction enjoining the consummation of the Merger, costs of the action, including plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and experts’ fees, and other relief the court may deem just and proper. Checkmate has also received demand letters from purported Checkmate shareholders (the “Demands”) requesting that Checkmate provide additional disclosures in connection with the Merger. Checkmate believes the claims asserted in the Merger Actions and the Demands are without merit. Additional lawsuits may be filed against Checkmate, the Checkmate Board, Regeneron and/or Purchaser, and additional demand letters may be received, in connection with the Transactions, the Schedule TO and the Schedule 14D-9.
Checkmate believes that no supplemental disclosure is required under applicable laws and that the Schedule 14D-9 disclosed all material information required to be disclosed therein. However, to avoid the risk that lawsuits may delay or otherwise adversely affect the Transactions and to minimize the expense of defending such actions, Checkmate wishes to make voluntarily certain supplemental disclosures related to the proposed Transactions, all of which are set forth below and should be read in conjunction with this Schedule 14D-9. Nothing in these supplemental disclosures shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of the disclosures set forth herein.
All page references used herein refer to pages in the Schedule 14D-9 before any additions or deletions resulting from the Supplemental Disclosures, and capitalized terms used below, unless otherwise defined, have the meanings set forth in the Schedule 14D-9. Underlined and bolded text shows text being added to a referenced disclosure in the Schedule 14D-9 and stricken-through text shows text being deleted from a referenced disclosure in the Schedule 14D-9. Except as specifically noted herein, the information set forth in the Schedule 14D-9 remains unchanged.