Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The Company's significant accounting policies are disclosed in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, which are included in the Company’s annual report filed on Form 10-K on March 14, 2017 . Since the date of those audited consolidated financial statements, there have been no changes to the Company's significant accounting policies, including the status of recent accounting pronouncements, other than those detailed below. (a) Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual audited consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments ( consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) , necessary for the fair statement of the Company's interim consolidated financial position for the periods indicated. The interim results for the three months ended March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017, any other interim periods, or any future year or period. As such, the information included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s annual report as filed on Form 10-K. (b) Liquidity The Company's unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of continuity of operations, realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that the Company's cash on hand of $2,805 as of March 31, 2017, cash flows from operations and borrowing availability under the Amended 2015 Revolving Line (Note 10) are sufficient to fund the Company's planned operations through at least June 30, 2018. (c) Use of Estimates The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates or assumptions. (d) Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenue from product sales or services rendered when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) services have been rendered, (iii) the price to its client is fixed or determinable and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. When the Company enters into arrangements with multiple deliverables, it applies the accounting guidance for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables and evaluates each deliverable to determine whether it represents a separate unit of accounting based on the following criteria: (i) whether the delivered item has value to the customer on a standalone basis, and (ii) if the contract includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item, delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in the control of the Company. Revenue is allocated to each element in an arrangement based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on estimated selling prices ("ESP") as vendor specific objective evidence or third party evidence is not available. The Company establishes ESP for the elements of its arrangements based upon its pricing practices and class of customers. The stated prices for the various deliverables of the Company's contracts are consistent across classes of customers. Product Revenue The Company enters into multiple-element arrangements with healthcare organizations to provide software enabled medication risk management solutions. Under these contracts, revenue is generated through the components listed below. Prescription medication revenue The Company sells prescription medications directly to healthcare organizations through its prescription fulfillment pharmacies. Prescription medication fees are based upon the prices stated in customer contracts for the prescription and include a dispensing fee. Prescription medication revenue, including dispensing fees, is recognized when the product is shipped to the customer. Prescription medications are considered a separate unit of accounting. Per member per month fees — medication risk management services The Company receives a fixed monthly administrative fee for each member in the program contracted for medication risk management services. This fee, which is included in product revenue in the consolidated statement of operations, is recognized on a monthly basis as medication risk management services are provided. The services associated with the per member per month fees are considered a separate unit of accounting. Service Revenue The Company enters into contracts with healthcare organizations to provide (i) risk adjustment and (ii) pharmacy cost management services, which include training client staff and providers about documentation and diagnosis coding, analyzing clients' data collection and submission processes, and delivering meaningful analytics for understanding reimbursement complexities. In the third quarter of 2016, the Company began providing medication risk management services utilizing the Medication Risk Mitigation Matrix (“MRM Matrix”) technology alone, without the related fulfillment services, which are referred to as MRM Service Contracts. Under the risk adjustment contracts and MRM Service Contracts, there are generally three revenue generating components: Set up fees: The Company's contracts with its risk adjustment and MRM Service Contract customers often require customers to pay non-refundable set up fees, which are deferred and recognized over the estimated term of the contract. These fees are charged at the beginning of the customer relationship as compensation for the Company's efforts to prepare the customer and configure its system for the data collection process. The set up activities do not represent a separate unit of accounting as they do not have value apart from the broader risk adjustment and MRM Service Contracts. Incremental direct costs associated with such set up activities are also deferred and amortized over the shorter of the estimated customer life or stated contract period. Per member per month fees The Company receives a fixed monthly fee for each member in the respective programs. These services represent a separate unit of accounting and are offered independently from any other services. Revenue for these services is recognized each month as the services are performed. Hourly consulting fees The Company sometimes contracts with customers to perform various other services. Such services are billed on a time and materials basis, at agreed hourly rates. Consulting services represent a separate unit of accounting and are offered independently from any other services. Revenue for these services is recognized as time is incurred on the project. The Company's pharmacy cost management services include subscription revenue from customers and revenues from drug manufacturers for the sale of drug utilization data. Subscription revenue is recognized monthly as either a flat fee or as a percentage of monthly transactions incurred. Data and statistics fees from drug manufacturers are recognized as revenue when received due to the unpredictable nature of the payments and because fees are not fixed and determinable until received. (e) Cost of Product Revenue Cost of product revenue includes all costs directly related to the medication risk management offering, including costs relating to the Company's pharmacists' collaboration on a patient's medication management, clinical analysis of the results and, when necessary, offering guidance to the prescriber based upon the review of the medication risk mitigation matrix and the individual patient's medical history, as well as the fulfillment and distribution of prescription drugs. Costs consist primarily of the purchase price of the prescription drugs the Company dispenses, expenses to package, dispense and distribute prescription drugs, expenses associated with the Company's medication care plan support centers and prescription fulfillment centers, including employment costs and stock-based compensation, and expenses related to the hosting of the Company's technology platform. Such costs also include direct overhead expenses, as well as allocated miscellaneous overhead costs. The Company allocates miscellaneous overhead costs among functions based on employee headcount. (f) Cost of Service Revenue Cost of service revenue includes all labor costs, including stock-based compensation expense, directly related to the risk adjustment and pharmacy cost management services and expenses for claims processing, technology services and overhead costs. In addition, service costs include all costs directly related to servicing the Company’s MRM Service Contracts which primarily consist of labor costs, consultant fees, technology services and overhead costs. (g) R ecent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASU 2014-09") and has subsequently issued a number of amendments to ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09, as amended, represents a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to clients in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 sets forth a new five-step revenue recognition model which replaces the prior revenue recognition guidance in its entirety and is intended to eliminate numerous industry-specific pieces of revenue recognition guidance that have historically existed. For public companies, ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016; however, the Company does not intend to early adopt the new standard. Companies may use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adopt ASU 2014-09. The Company intends to adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2018 but has not yet determined which transition method will be used. The Company is currently analyzing significant contracts with customers to determine the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures. The Company will continue to assess all potential impacts of the standard on existing and new customer contracts during 2017, with a final evaluation of the impact of the adoption of the new standard expected to be completed by the end of 2017 . In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory ("ASU 2015-11"), which simplifies the subsequent measurement of inventories by replacing the current lower of cost or market test with a lower of cost and net realizable value test. ASU 2015-11 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has adopted ASU 2015-11 effective January 1, 2017. The adoption of this standard did not have any impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) ("ASU 2016-02"). The new standard establishes a right-of-use ("ROU") model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of this standard and anticipates that this standard will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, as all long-term leases will be capitalized on the consolidated balance sheet. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting ("ASU 2016-09"). The amendments in this update simplify certain aspects related to how share-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements. The new guidance requires excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies be recorded as an income tax benefit or expense in the statement of operations when the awards vest or are settled and as operating cash flows when realized. The excess tax benefits are recognized regardless of the whether the benefit reduces income taxes payable in the current period. It also allows an employer to repurchase more of an employee's shares than it can today for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting and to make a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 effective January 1, 2017 and the adoption of this new standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements in the first quarter of 2017. The Company elected to record forfeitures as they occur. There was no impact of this election because prior to the adoption, the Company’s historical forfeitures were de minimus. Excess tax benefits generated in the quarter ended March 31, 2017 totaled $6,287 and unrecognized tax benefits were $108 at December 31, 2016, however, there was no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements because of a full valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments ("ASU 2016-15"). ASU 2016-15 provides new guidance to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-15 on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (“ASU 2017-01”). ASU 2017-01 provides guidance for evaluating whether a set of transferred assets and activities (the “set”) should be accounted for as an acquisition of a business or group of assets. The guidance provides a screen to determine when a set does not qualify to be a business. When substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in an identifiable asset or a group of similar assets, the set is not a business. Also to be considered a business, the set would have to include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. ASU 2017-01 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of ASU 2017-01 on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment ("ASU 2017-04"). ASU 2017-04 simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment by eliminating the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill to measure an impairment charge. Instead, entities will be required to record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying value over its fair value. ASU 2017-04 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of ASU 2017-04 on the Company's consolidated financial statements. |