Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial reporting and the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and, therefore, do not include all information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature that are necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The December 31, 2015 condensed consolidated balance sheet data contained within this Form 10-Q was derived from audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (“Annual Report”), but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Significant Accounting Policies There have been no material changes in the Company’s significant accounting policies as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared with the significant accounting policies described in the Company’s Annual Report. Use of Estimates The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the Company’s opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation On February 1, 2016, the Company amended its certificate of incorporation such that the total authorized capital stock of the Company consisted of 30,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, 3,278,938 shares of Class B-1 preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share, 326,557 shares of Class B-2 preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share, 2,365,020 shares of Class C preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share, 3,105,000 shares of Class D preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share. Additionally, the Company effected a stock split whereby each outstanding share of common stock and Class B-1, B-2, C and D preferred stock was converted into 1.38 shares of common stock and Class B-1, B-2, C and D preferred stock, respectively. All share and per share information presented in these condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split. Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation On February 17, 2016, the Company amended its certificate of incorporation such that the total authorized capital stock of the Company consisted of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern , requiring management to evaluate whether events or conditions could impact an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year after the date that the financial statements are issued and to provide disclosures if necessary. Disclosures will be required if conditions give rise to substantial doubt and the type of disclosure will be determined based on whether management’s plans will be able to alleviate the substantial doubt. The ASU will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2017. The Company is evaluating the adoption of this ASU, but has not determined the effects it may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period , which requires the Company to assess share-based awards with performance targets that could be achieved after the requisite service period for potential treatment as performance conditions. Under the ASU, compensation expense is to be recognized when the performance target is deemed probable and should represent the compensation expense attributable to the periods for which service has already been rendered. If the performance target is reached prior to achievement of the service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized over the remaining service period. The ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015 with early adoption permitted. The Company has adopted this ASU, which did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-16, Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity (“ASU 2014-16”). The guidance requires an entity to determine the nature of the host contract by considering all stated and implied substantive terms and features of the hybrid financial instrument, weighing each term and feature on the basis of the relevant facts and circumstances (commonly referred to as the whole-instrument approach). ASU 2014-16 applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has adopted this ASU which did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In November 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes . To simplify presentation, the new guidance requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. As a result, each jurisdiction will now only have one net noncurrent deferred tax asset or liability. The new guidance will be effective for public business entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company is evaluating adoption, but has not determined the effects it may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-2, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis , which provides clarification regarding the guidance surrounding consolidation of certain legal entities. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company has determined that adopting this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 2016-02, Leases (“ASC 842”). The guidance requires lessees to recognize almost all leases on their balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance. Lessor accounting is similar to the current model, but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model and the new revenue recognition standard. Existing sale-leaseback guidance, including guidance for real estate, is replaced with a new model applicable to both lessees and lessors. ASC 842 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is evaluating the adoption of ASC 842, but has not determined the effects it may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”) , which requires the Company to recognize the income tax effects of awards in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016 with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the adoption of ASU 2016-09, but has not determined the effects it may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |