Basis of Presentation, Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements | Basis of Presentation, Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements Basis of Presentation The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, including its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The financial statements included herein were prepared from the records of the Company in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulation for interim financial reporting. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals that are considered necessary for a fair statement of the condensed consolidated financial information, have been included. However, operating results for the period presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year. Interim condensed consolidated financial statements and the year-end balance sheet do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for audited annual consolidated financial statements. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report. Significant Accounting Policies The significant accounting policies followed by the Company are set forth in Note 2 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in its Annual Report and are supplemented by the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in this report. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-15, which aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license. For public entities, the new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating this new standard to determine the potential impact to its financial statements and related disclosures. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, which improves the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. For public entities, the new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating this new standard to determine the potential impact to its financial statements and related disclosures. In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, which provides clarification and reduces both (1) diversity in practice and (2) cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718 Compensation - Stock Compensation, to a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. For public entities, the new guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2018 and the adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, which provided clarification regarding the guidance on accounting for the derecognition of nonfinancial assets. For public entities, the new guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that fiscal year. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2018 and the adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, which simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount. For public entities, the new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim and annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU, however it is not expected to have a significant effect on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, which clarifies the definition of a business when evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. For public entities, the new guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2018 and the adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures; however, this standard may result in more transactions being accounted for as asset acquisitions rather than business combinations. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, which intends to clarify how entities should present restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. This amendment was effective retrospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2018 and the retrospective adoption increased the Company's beginning cash balances within the statement of cash flows for the prior period presented in the table below. The adoption had no other material impact on the cash flow statement and had no impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position. The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the consolidated balance sheets to the consolidated statement of cash flows: As of September 30, December 31, September 30, December 31, 2018 2017 2017 2016 Cash and cash equivalents $ 274,065 $ 6,768 $ 114,139 $ 588,736 Restricted cash included in cash held in escrow — — — 42,200 $ 274,065 $ 6,768 $ 114,139 $ 630,936 In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, which addresses eight specific cash flow issues, including presentation of debt prepayments or debt extinguishment costs, with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. For public entities, the new guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2018, which requires current period make-whole premiums to be presented in financing activities in the statement of cash flows and prior period debt prepayment costs to be reclassified from operating activities to financing activities in the statement of cash flows; however, there will be no impact to the total change in cash and cash equivalents from period to period. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, which requires lessee recognition on the balance sheet of a right of use asset and a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments. It further requires recognition in the income statement of a single lease cost, calculated so that the cost of the lease is allocated over the lease term on a generally straight-line basis. Finally, it requires classification of all cash payments within operating activities in the statements of cash flows. It is effective for fiscal years commencing after December 15, 2018 and early adoption is permitted. The FASB subsequently issued ASU No. 2017-13, ASU No. 2018-01, ASU No. 2018-10 and ASU No. 2018-11, which provided additional implementation guidance. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this ASU will have on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures and expects certain lease agreements with terms over one year to be classified as right-of-use assets and right-of-use liabilities, which will gross up the consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2019. As a part of the implementation work, the Company is finalizing its initial conclusions with its external consulting firm, implementing a software tool used to calculate the initial and ongoing accounting balances for right-of-use assets and liabilities, and is assessing the completeness of the lease population. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, which establishes a comprehensive new revenue recognition model, referred to as ASC 606 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers, designed to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU allows for the use of either the full or modified retrospective transition method. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, which deferred ASU No. 2014-09 for one year, and was effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The FASB subsequently issued ASU No. 2016-08, ASU No. 2016-10, ASU No. 2016-11, ASU No. 2016-12, ASU No. 2016-20, ASU No. 2017-13 and ASU No. 2017-14, which provided additional implementation guidance. Refer to —Adoption of ASC 606 for more information. Adoption of ASC 606 On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASC 606"). The Company adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method to apply the new standard to all new contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2018 and all existing contracts for which all (or substantially all) of the revenue has not been recognized under legacy revenue guidance. ASC 606 supersedes previous revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605 and includes a five-step revenue recognition model to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The impact of adoption in the current period results are as follows (in thousands): For the Three Months Ended For the Nine Months Ended Under ASC 606 Under ASC 605 Change Under ASC 606 Under ASC 605 Change Revenues: Oil sales $ 225,467 $ 225,467 $ — $ 619,211 $ 619,211 $ — Natural gas sales 23,103 26,394 (3,291 ) 66,991 76,492 (9,501 ) NGL sales 33,590 39,154 (5,564 ) 86,369 101,349 (14,980 ) Total Revenues 282,160 291,015 (8,855 ) 772,571 797,052 (24,481 ) Operating Expenses: Transportation and gathering $ 11,786 $ 20,641 $ (8,855 ) $ 29,284 $ 53,765 $ (24,481 ) Net Income $ 65,150 $ 65,150 $ — $ 22,003 $ 22,003 $ — Changes to sales of natural gas and NGL, and transportation and gathering expenses are due to the conclusion that certain midstream processing entities are the Company's customers in natural gas processing and marketing agreements in accordance with the five-step process in ASC 606. This is a change from previous conclusions reached for these agreements utilizing the principal versus agent indicators under ASC 605 where the Company determined it was the principal, the midstream processor was the agent and the third-party end user was its customer. As a result, the Company modified its presentation of revenues and operating expenses for these agreements. Revenues related to these agreements are now presented on a net basis for proceeds expected to be received from the midstream processing entity. Transportation and gathering expense related to other agreements incurred prior to the transfer of control to the customer at the tailgate of the natural gas processing facilities will continue to be presented as transportation and gathering expense. Revenues from Contracts with Customers Sales of oil, natural gas and NGL are recognized at the point control of the commodity is transferred to the customer and collectability is reasonably assured. The majority of the Company's contracts' pricing provisions are tied to a commodity market index, with certain adjustments based on, among other factors, whether a well delivers to a gathering or transmission line, quality of the oil or natural gas, and prevailing supply and demand conditions. As a result, the price of the oil, natural gas and NGL fluctuates to remain competitive with the other available oil, natural gas and NGL supplies. Oil Sales Under the Company's crude purchase and marketing contracts, the Company generally sells oil production at the wellhead and collects an agreed-upon index price, net of pricing differentials. In this scenario, the Company recognizes revenue when control transfers to the purchaser at the wellhead at the net price received. The Company utilizes the sales method to account for producer imbalances, which continues to be applicable under ASC 606. As of September 30, 2018 , the Company has an oil imbalance of 54 MBbl, which the Company intends to settle with the counterparty in crude oil barrels. Natural Gas and NGL Sales Under the Company's natural gas processing contracts, the Company delivers natural gas to a midstream processing entity at the wellhead or the inlet of the midstream processing entity's system. The midstream processing entity gathers and processes the natural gas and remits proceeds to the Company for the resulting sales of NGL and residue gas. In these scenarios, we evaluate whether we are the principal or the agent in the transaction, and the point at which control of the hydrocarbons transfer to the customer. For those contracts where the Company has concluded the midstream processing entity is the Company's agent and the third-party end user is its customer (generally the Company's fixed-fee gathering and processing agreements), the Company recognizes revenue on a gross basis, with transportation and gathering expense presented as an operating expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Alternatively, for those contracts where the Company has concluded the midstream processing entity is its customer and controls the hydrocarbons (generally the Company's percentage of proceeds gathering and processing agreements), the Company recognizes natural gas and NGL revenues based on the net amount of the proceeds received from the midstream processing company. In certain natural gas processing agreements, the Company may elect to take its residue gas and/or NGL in-kind at the tailgate of the midstream entity's processing plant and subsequently market the product. Through the marketing process, the Company delivers product to the third-party purchaser at a contractually agreed-upon delivery point and receives a specified index price from the purchaser. In this scenario, the Company recognizes revenue when the control transfers to the purchaser at the delivery point based on the index price received from the purchaser. The gathering and processing expense attributable to the gas processing contracts, as well as any transportation expense incurred to deliver the product to the purchaser, are presented as transportation and gathering expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Performance Obligations A significant number of the Company's product sales are short-term in nature with a contract term of one year or less. For those contracts, the Company has utilized the practical expedient in ASC 606-10-50-14 exempting the Company from disclosure of the transaction price of a contract that has an original expected duration of one year or less. For the Company's product sales that have a contract term greater than one year, the Company has utilized the practical expedient in ASC 606-10-50-14(a), which states the Company is not required to disclose the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations if the variable consideration is allocated entirely to a wholly unsatisfied performance obligation. Under these sales contracts, each unit of product generally represents a separate performance obligation; therefore future volumes are wholly unsatisfied and disclosure of the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations is not required. The Company records revenue on its oil, natural gas and NGL sales at the time production is delivered to the purchaser. However, settlement statements for certain oil, natural gas and NGL sales may not be received for 30 to 90 days after the date production is delivered, and as a result, the Company is required to estimate the amount of production delivered to the customer and the net commodity price that will be received for the sale of these commodity products. The Company records the differences between the revenue estimated and the actual amounts received for product sales in the month that payment is received from the customer. The Company has internal controls over its revenue estimation process and related accruals, and any identified differences between its revenue estimates and actual revenue received historically have not been significant. For the period from January 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018 , revenue recognized in the reporting period related to performance obligations satisfied in prior reporting periods was not material. Contract Balances Under the Company's various sales contracts, the Company invoices customers once its performance obligations have been satisfied, at which point payment is unconditional. Accordingly, the Company's product sales contracts do not give rise to contract assets or liabilities under ASC 606. The following table presents the Company's revenues disaggregated by revenue source. Transportation and gathering costs in the following table are not all of the transportation and gathering expenses that the Company incurs, only the expenses that are netted against revenues pursuant to ASC 606. Prior period amounts have not been adjusted under the modified retrospective method. For the Three Months For the Nine Months 2018 2017 2018 2017 Revenues: Oil sales $ 225,467 $ 132,075 $ 619,211 $ 269,597 Natural gas sales 26,394 24,672 76,492 63,095 NGL sales 39,154 24,114 101,349 57,574 Transportation and gathering included in revenues (8,855 ) — (24,481 ) — Total Revenues $ 282,160 $ 180,861 $ 772,571 $ 390,266 Other than as disclosed above or in the Company’s Annual Report, there are no other accounting standards applicable to the Company that would have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures that have been issued but not yet adopted by the Company through the date of this filing. |