As previously announced, on May 19, 2022, Centennial Resource Development, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Centennial”), Centennial Resource Production, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and subsidiary of Centennial (“Merger Sub” and, together with Centennial, the “Centennial Parties”), Colgate Energy Partners III, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Colgate”), and, solely for purposes of the specified provisions therein, Colgate Energy Partners III MidCo, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Colgate Unitholder”), entered into that certain Business Combination Agreement (the “Business Combination Agreement”), pursuant to which, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions in the Business Combination Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into Colgate (the “Merger”), with Merger Sub surviving the Merger as a subsidiary of Centennial (the “Surviving Company”). On July 28, 2022, Centennial filed a definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A (the “Proxy Statement”) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) relating to the special meeting of Centennial’s stockholders to approve certain matters related to the Merger, which will be held on August 29, 2022.
Since the filing of the Proxy Statement, one complaint has been filed with respect to the Merger in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, one complaint has been filed with respect to the Merger in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and one complaint has been filed with respect to the Merger in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The complaints are captioned as follows: Robert Scott v. Centennial Resource Development, Inc., et al., No. 1:22-cv-06906-GHW (S.D.N.Y.) (“Scott”); Robert Wilhelm v. Centennial Resource Development, Inc., et al., No. 1:22-cv-01053-UNA (D. Del.) (“Wilhelm”); and Samuel Carlisle v. Centennial Resource Development, Inc., et al., No. 1:22-cv-02007-DDD (D. COLO.) (“Carlisle,” and together with Scott and Wilhelm, the “Stockholder Actions”).
The Stockholder Actions were filed by purported Centennial stockholders and assert claims against Centennial and members of the board of directors of Centennial (the “Centennial Board”).
The Stockholder Actions generally allege, among other things, that the Proxy Statement omits material information related to the Merger, rendering the Proxy Statement false and misleading in violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as well as Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder. The Stockholder Actions seek, among other relief, (i) injunctive relief enjoining each of the proposed issuance of Centennial common stock as merger consideration, the stockholder vote to authorize such issuance and consummation of the Merger and (ii) to recover damages and costs. In addition, as of the date of this Current Report on Form 8-K, six purported stockholders sent letters to Centennial alleging similar deficiencies in Centennial’s preliminary proxy statement filed on Schedule 14A on June 10, 2022 (the “Preliminary Proxy Statement”) and, in the case of one such stockholder the Proxy Statement, to those noted in the above-referenced Stockholder Actions (collectively, the “Demand Letters”).
Centennial believes that the claims in the Stockholder Actions and Demand Letters are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them.
Supplemental Proxy Statement Disclosure
Centennial does not believe, with respect to the Stockholder Actions or Demand Letters, that supplemental disclosures are required or necessary under applicable laws or that any information contained herein is material. However, solely to moot the unmeritorious disclosure claims and minimize the risk, costs, burden, nuisance and uncertainties inherent in litigation, and without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, Centennial is electing to make the supplemental disclosures to the Proxy Statement set forth below in response to the Stockholder Actions and Demand Letters. These supplemental disclosures should be read in conjunction with, and incorporated by reference into, the Proxy Statement. Centennial denies the allegations in the Stockholder Actions and Demand Letters, and denies any violation of law. Centennial believes that the Preliminary Proxy Statement and Proxy Statement disclosed all material information required to be disclosed therein, and denies that the supplemental disclosures are material or are otherwise required to be disclosed. Nothing in the supplemental disclosures should be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality of any supplemental disclosures under applicable laws.