Collaborative Arrangements | 15. Collaboration agreements The following table summarizes the total consolidated net revenue from the strategic collaborators for the periods presented (in thousands): YEAR ENDED Collaboration Revenue by Strategic Collaborator: 2021 2020 Jazz $ 11,322 $ 641 Sarepta 11,613 2,274 Total collaboration revenue $ 22,935 $ 2,915 The following tables present changes in the Company’s contract assets and liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2021 (in thousands): YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021 BALANCE ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS BALANCE Contract assets: Account receivable (1) $ — $ 3,914 $ ( 3,286 ) $ 628 Contract liabilities: Deferred revenue $ 62,697 $ — $ ( 19,048 ) $ 43,649 (1) Included in prepaid expenses and other current assets as shown within the consolidated balance sheets. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized the following revenue (in thousands): YEAR ENDED 2021 2020 Revenue recognized in the period from: Amounts included in deferred revenue at the beginning of the period $ 19,048 $ 641 Jazz collaboration and license agreement Agreement summary On January 2, 2019, the Company entered into a Collaboration and License Agreement (the Jazz Collaboration Agreement) with Jazz focused on the research, development and commercialization of exosome therapeutics to treat cancer. The Company granted Jazz an exclusive, worldwide, sublicensable, royalty-bearing license to develop, manufacture and commercialize therapeutic candidates directed at up to five oncogene targets (each, a Development and Commercialization License) to be developed using the Company’s engEx Platform for exosome therapeutics. The targets have been validated in hematological malignancies and solid tumors but generally have been undruggable with current modalities. On December 23, 2020, the Company and Jazz entered into an amendment to the Jazz Collaboration Agreement (the First Amendment). The First Amendment extended the time available for Jazz to exercise an option to July 2, 2021 with respect to either the inclusion of an additional target or initiation of an additional program. The First Amendment did not modify any of the other provisions of the Jazz Collaboration Agreement and did not result in any change in transaction price. Four of the targets were identified at the inception of the collaboration (the Initial Collaboration Targets) and on June 30 , 2021. As set forth in the Jazz Collaboration Agreement, early development will also include different engineered exosomes directed to the same target (each, a Backup Candidate). In April 2021, the Company and Jazz mutually agreed to discontinue their work on exoASO-STAT3 (STAT3), one of the five oncogene targets subject to the Jazz Collaboration Agreement. On June 30, 2021, Jazz formally nominated the fifth collaboration target. Jazz also has the option to nominate an additional target (a Replacement Target) if two of the Initial Collaboration Targets fail prior to acceptance of an Investigational New Drug application (IND). In January 2022, the Company and Jazz mutually agreed to discontinue their work on the NRAS program. As a result of this discontinuation, Jazz may nominate a replacement target, subject to nomination requirements as outlined in the collaboration agreement. Codiak and Jazz continue to jointly advance their research and development efforts on other exosome-based therapeutic programs to treat cancer pursuant to the Jazz Collaboration Agreement. Under the terms of the Jazz Collaboration Agreement, the Company is responsible for the initial development of therapeutic candidates directed at all five targets as well as the costs associated with such development activities. In addition, the Company is responsible for development costs up to and including IND acceptance, and certain development costs of the Phase 1, Phase 1/2 and Phase 2 clinical trials for each of the first two therapeutic candidates to commence clinical trials. Following the conclusion of the applicable clinical trials for the first two candidates, and for the remaining three candidates, Jazz will be responsible for the further development and associated costs of the therapeutic candidates, including all Phase 3 and any Phase 4 clinical trials, potential regulatory submissions and commercialization for each product at its sole cost and expense. The Company has the option to participate in co-commercialization and cost/profit-sharing in the US and Canada on up to two products, subject to a one-time veto right by Jazz (which exercise of such veto may result in an additional $ 20.0 million milestone payment to the Company related to regulatory approval of the product). Should the Company choose to exercise this option, the Company and Jazz will equally split most of the remaining development costs and the net profits or losses in the US and Canada, while the Company would receive milestones and royalties for sales in other parts of the world. In the event that the Company does not exercise its option, the Company will receive milestones and royalties based upon sales worldwide. As part of the Jazz Collaboration Agreement, Jazz has paid the Company an up-front payment of $ 56.0 million. The Company is eligible to receive up to $ 20.0 million in preclinical development milestone payments, the first of which is for $ 10.0 million and will be due from Jazz upon the second initiation of IND-enabling toxicology studies for a collaboration target. The Company is also eligible to receive milestone payments totaling up to $ 200.0 million per product based on IND acceptance, clinical and regulatory milestones, including approvals in the US, the EU and Japan, and sales milestones. In addition, the Company will receive tiered royalties on net sales of each approved product, with percentages ranging from mid-single digits in the lowest tier to high teens in the highest tier, excluding such net sales in the US and Canada if the Company has exercised its option to co-commercialize the related product. The milestone and royalty payments are each subject to reduction under certain specified conditions set forth in the Jazz Collaboration Agreement, provided, however, that in the case of a termination with respect to a licensed compound that is a Development Candidate (as defined below), Jazz will maintain its obligation to reimburse the Company for certain development costs. Either party can terminate the agreement with respect to a region and a target upon the other party’s material breach relating to such region and target, subject to specified notice and cure provisions. Jazz also has the right to terminate the agreement in its entirety or in part (with respect to a particular collaboration target, research program, licensed compound or product, region or, in some cases, country) for convenience at any time upon 180 days ’ written notice or for safety reasons immediately upon notice, provided, however, that in the case of a termination for convenience with respect to a licensed compound that is a Development Candidate, Jazz will maintain its obligation to reimburse the Company for certain development costs. Absent early termination, the term of the Jazz Collaboration Agreement will continue on a country-by-country basis and licensed product-by-licensed product basis, until the expiration of the royalty payment obligations for the country and the licensed product (or, in the case of a shared territory for an optioned product, will continue for so long as such optioned product is being sold by Jazz or its affiliates or sublicensees in the shared territory). Any expiration or termination of the Jazz Collaboration Agreement does not affect the rights and obligations of the parties that accrued prior to the expiration or termination date. Upon termination of the Jazz Collaboration Agreement, all licenses granted by the Company to Jazz will immediately terminate. Accounting analysis The Company evaluated the Jazz Collaboration Agreement, as amended, in accordance with the provisions of ASC 606. The Company concluded that the contract counterparty is a customer in the arrangement. The Company accounted for the extension of the exercise period pursuant to the First Amendment as a modification. The Company did not account for the First Amendment as a separate contract because the amendment did not result in an increase to the scope of the arrangement nor was the pricing of the arrangement increased. Accordingly, the First Amendment was combined with the Jazz Collaboration Agreement. For the remaining promised goods and services that are distinct from the goods and services that were transferred on or before the date of the effectiveness of the First Amendment, the Company has accounted for the modification on a prospective basis as if it were a termination of the existing contract and the creation of a new contract. Conversely, the remaining promised goods and services that are not distinct from the goods and services that were transferred on or before the date of the effectiveness of the First Amendment were deemed to form part of a single performance obligation that is partially satisfied so they have been accounted for as part of the existing contract for which an adjustment has been recorded on a cumulative catch-up basis at the date of the modification. The Company determined that the change to the arrangement that was enacted by the First Amendment did not impact the identification of the promises in the contract. The Company’s obligations under the Jazz Collaboration Agreement, as amended, comprise the following substantive promises: • Development and Commercialization Licenses for each of the Initial Collaboration Targets (each, a Development and Commercialization License Promise) • Research services related to the conduct of the applicable work plan, which provides a framework for the applicable research activities, performed on a target-by-target basis, pursuant to a program aimed at identifying and evaluating exosome therapeutics directed to the individual targets (each such program for research activities, a Research Program) and sets forth the specific activities to be undertaken over the course of such Research Program, including the associated objectives and timelines therefor (each, a Work Plan) for each of the four Initial Collaboration Targets that are the subject of the collaboration (each, a Research Services Promise) • Preclinical and clinical services related to the completion of the Early Development Plans (as defined below) for each of the four Initial Collaboration Targets that are the subject of the collaboration (each, a Development Services Promise) • Material right associated with Jazz’s ability to obtain either: (i) a Development and Commercialization License, research services pursuant to an associated Work Plan, and preclinical and clinical services pursuant to an associated plan that describes the preclinical studies, manufacturing process development, and clinical development to be performed with respect to an applicable product candidate that the parties determine is suitable for IND-enabling studies (each such product candidate, a Development Candidate) and the associated timelines, budget and resource allocation therefor (each, an Early Development Plan) for an Additional Target or (ii) research services pursuant to an associated Work Plan and preclinical and clinical services pursuant to an associated Early Development Plan for an additional Research Program for one of the Initial Collaboration Targets (an Additional Research Program, and such material right, the Additional Target or Program Material Right Promise) • Material right associated with Jazz’s ability to obtain a Development and Commercialization License, research services pursuant to an associated Work Plan and preclinical and clinical services pursuant to an associated Early Development Plan for a Replacement Target (the Replacement Target Material Right Promise) • Material rights associated with Jazz’s ability to obtain services with respect to non-GLP toxicology studies for two Backup Candidates (each, a Backup Candidate Material Right Promise) For purposes of evaluating the Jazz Collaboration Agreement, as amended, in accordance with ASC 606, the Company has determined that the ability for Jazz to either nominate an Additional Target or request an Additional Research Program represents a material right because the pricing inherent in such option provides the customer with a discount that is incremental to the range of discounts that would otherwise be granted for the related goods and services to comparable customers. More specifically, the Development and Commercialization License and associated research services under the related Work Plan that would be provided pursuant to Jazz’s option to include an Additional Target within the scope of the arrangement would be provided at no additional cost to Jazz. Similarly, the research services under a Work Plan that would be provided upon an exercise of Jazz’s option to request an Additional Research Program would be provided at no additional cost to Jazz. The deadline for the exercise of this option was extended by a defined period of time under the First Amendment, but the option was otherwise unchanged. Additionally, the Company has determined that the ability for Jazz to elect a Replacement Target represents a material right because the pricing inherent in such option provides the customer with a discount that is incremental to the range of discounts that would otherwise be granted for the related goods and services to comparable customers. Consistent with an Additional Target, to the extent Jazz requests that a Replacement Target be included within the scope of the arrangement, the Development and Commercialization License and associated research services under the related Work Plan would be provided at no additional cost to Jazz. Lastly, the Company determined that the ability for Jazz to request the Company to render services with respect to non-GLP toxicology studies for certain Backup Candidates represents a material right because the pricing inherent in such option also provides the customer with a discount that is incremental to the range of discounts that would otherwise be granted for the related services to comparable customers. Along the same lines as the other material rights, upon Jazz’s exercise, the Company would render services with respect to the conduct of non-GLP toxicology studies for one Backup Candidate for each of the first two Development Candidates at no cost to Jazz. The Company determined that the extension of the exercise period pursuant to the First Amendment did not affect the composition of the performance obligations. For purposes of evaluating the Jazz Collaboration Agreement, as amended, in accordance with ASC 606, the Company determined that the Development and Commercialization License Promise for each of the Initial Collaboration Targets is neither capable of being distinct nor distinct within the context of the contract from the associated Research Services Promise and Development Services Promise. Due to the specialized nature of the services to be provided by the Company, specifically with respect to the Company’s proprietary expertise related to exosome engineering and manufacturing, the customer cannot benefit from or utilize the license without the research and development services. Moreover, the Company concluded that the Development and Commercialization License Promise, Research Services Promise and Development Services Promise for each individual target are interrelated to and interdependent on each other. Due to the nature of the services and capabilities of the parties, the customer cannot derive its intended benefit from the license without the accompanying research and development services to be performed pursuant to the underlying Work Plans and Early Development Plans. The nature of the combined performance obligation is to provide certain research and development services for targets that are designated for inclusion in the arrangement in order to transfer a combined item to the customer in the form of a product candidate for which human proof of concept has been established. As such, the Company has treated the Development and Commercialization License Promise, Research Services Promise and Development Services Promise related to each target as a combined performance obligation (each, a License and Services Performance Obligation; collectively, the License and Services Performance Obligations). However, the Company has determined that the License and Services Performance Obligation associated with each target is distinct from the License and Services Performance Obligation for the other targets because: (i) Jazz can benefit from the license and research and development services for a given target on their own since the results related thereto can be evaluated discretely and (ii) each bundle for an individual target is separately identifiable since it does not affect either the Company’s ability to perform or Jazz’s ability to assess the program for any other target. Thus, the License and Services Performance Obligation for each target is a separate performance obligation. Each of the material right promises has been deemed a distinct performance obligation due to their nature as specified in ASC 606. The Company has identified the following eight performance obligations in connection with its obligations under the Jazz Collaboration Agreement, as amended : • Combined performance obligation comprising the Development and Commercialization License Promise, Research Services Promise and Development Services Promise for each of the four Initial Collaboration Targets (the License and Services Performance Obligation: Initial Collaboration Target #1, License and Services Performance Obligation: Initial Collaboration Target #2, License and Services Performance Obligation: Initial Collaboration Target #3 and License and Services Performance Obligation: Initial Collaboration Target #4, respectively) • Material right associated with Jazz’s option to request either: (i) an Additional Target or (ii) an Additional Research Program (the Additional Target or Program Material Right Performance Obligation) • Material right associated with Jazz’s option to request a Replacement Target (the Replacement Target Material Right Performance Obligation) • Material right associated with Jazz’s option to request certain Backup Candidates (the Backup Candidate Material Right Performance Obligation: Backup Candidate #1 and Backup Candidate Material Right Performance Obligation: Backup Candidate #2, respectively) Accordingly, in accounting for the modification resulting from the First Amendment, the License and Services Performance Obligations were treated as part of the existing contract, whereas the material right performance obligations were treated as a termination of the existing contract and the creation of a new contract. At inception of the arrangement, the Company measured the transaction price solely in reference to the $ 56.0 million non-refundable and non-creditable up-front payment. None of the variable consideration payable under the arrangement was included in the transaction price at inception. The Company estimates the amount of variable consideration to which it expects to be entitled associated with cost reimbursements, in addition to preclinical development, IND acceptance, clinical and regulatory milestones, using the most likely amount method. The Company did not include any cost reimbursements in the transaction price at inception due to the uncertainty around the Company’s receipt of such amounts as it is dependent upon viable product candidates progressing through development. All preclinical development, IND acceptance, clinical and regulatory milestone payments were excluded from the transaction price at inception due to the uncertainty of initiating the specified phase of preclinical development, achieving the associated development criteria or receiving approval or acknowledgement from the relevant regulatory authorities. Further, regulatory milestone payments will be excluded from the transaction price until the associated regulatory milestone is achieved. The sales milestone payments, royalties and profit share are subject to the royalty recognition constraint because the associated license is deemed to be the sole or predominant item to which the payments relate. As of December 23, 2020, the total remaining consideration was $ 55.0 million which solely comprises the transaction price on the original contract not yet recognized as revenue because the modification did not change the arrangement consideration. The Company updates its assessment of the estimated transaction price at the end of each reporting period and as uncertain events are resolved or other changes in circumstances occur. There have been no changes to the Company’s estimate of variable consideration on active performance obligations since inception of the arrangement through December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2021, the Company has not achieved any preclinical development, IND acceptance, clinical, regulatory or sales milestones or earned any royalties or profit share under the Jazz Collaboration Agreement. Upon modification, the Company allocated the transaction price associated with the remaining consideration to each of the identified performance obligations on a relative standalone selling price basis. Certain elements of variable consideration are attributable to specific performance obligations; however, no amounts of variable consideration have been included in the transaction price. The Company updated the standalone selling prices for each of the identified performance obligations to reflect assumptions and estimates in effect on the modification date. The Company determined the updated standalone selling prices for each of the performance obligations included in the Jazz Collaboration Agreement considering relevant market conditions, entity-specific factors and information about the customer, while maximizing the use of available observable inputs. As a result, the transaction price associated with the remaining consideration was reallocated to the identified performance obligations as follows (in thousands): PERFORMANCE OBLIGATION ALLOCATED License and Services Performance Obligation: Initial Collaboration Target #1 $ 12,717 License and Services Performance Obligation: Initial Collaboration Target #2 13,702 License and Services Performance Obligation: Initial Collaboration Target #3 10,866 License and Services Performance Obligation: Initial Collaboration Target #4 13,593 Additional Target or Program Material Right Performance Obligation 2,812 Replacement Target Material Right Performance Obligation 1,188 Backup Candidate Material Right Performance Obligation: Backup Candidate #1 47 Backup Candidate Material Right Performance Obligation: Backup Candidate #2 47 Transaction Price $ 54,972 The standalone selling price for each of the License and Services Performance Obligations was estimated using a hybrid approach whereby the standalone selling price for each of the Development and Commercialization License Promises was estimated using an income approach, while the standalone selling price of the Research Services Promises and Development Services Promises for each of the plans associated with the individual targets were estimated using an expected cost-plus margin approach. The discounted cash flow analysis utilized in deriving the estimated standalone selling price for each of the Development and Commercialization License Promises included such key assumptions as: development timeline, revenue forecast, discount rate and probabilities of technical and regulatory success. The cost-plus margin approach utilized in deriving the estimated standalone selling price for the Research Services Promises and Development Services Promises for each target was based on the estimate of the overall effort to perform the underlying Work Plans and Early Development Plans and an estimated market rate for the associated services. The standalone selling prices for the Additional Target or Program Material Right Performance Obligation and Replacement Target Material Right Performance Obligation were estimated based on a similar hybrid approach as the License and Services Performance Obligations, but also contemplated the discount the customer could receive without exercising the corresponding option and the likelihood that the respective option will be exercised. The standalone selling price for the Additional Target or Program Material Right Performance Obligation also reflects the likelihood that each of the alternatives will be selected by Jazz. Lastly, the standalone selling prices for the Backup Candidate Material Right Performance Obligations was estimated using an expected cost-plus margin approach based on the estimate of the overall effort to perform the associated non-GLP toxicology studies. Amounts allocated to each of the License and Services Performance Obligations is recognized as revenue over time commensurate with the term of the associated Research Program and development activities performed pursuant to a program focused on establishing human proof-of-concept for a given target using a proportional performance model which depicts the Company’s performance in transferring control to the customer. The Company utilizes a cost-based input method to measure progress because such method best reflects the satisfaction of the performance obligation as the underlying services are provided. In applying the cost-based input method of revenue recognition, the Company uses actual costs incurred relative to the budgeted costs to complete each of the respective programs. These costs consist primarily of internal full-time equivalent effort and third-party costs. Allocated amounts are recognized as revenue based on actual costs incurred as a percentage of total budgeted costs. A cost-based input method of revenue recognition requires management to make estimates of costs to complete the Company’s performance obligations. In making such estimates, significant judgment is required to evaluate assumptions related to cost estimates. The cumulative effect of revisions to estimated costs to complete the programs is recorded in the period in which changes are identified and amounts can be reasonably estimated. A significant change in these assumptions and estimates could have a material impact on the timing and amount of revenue recognized in future periods. During 2021, the Company and Jazz mutually agreed to discontinue their work on STAT3, one of five oncogene targets subject to the Jazz Collaboration Agreement. Jazz maintains a license to the STAT3 program and has the contractual right to revive it to an active target in the future. T he Company recognized the remaining $ 10.9 million in deferred revenue allocated to this target during twelve months ended December 31, 2021 . On June 30, 2021, Jazz formally nominated the fifth collaboration target. The Company will recognize the $ 2.8 million of revenue allocated to this performance obligation consistent with all active Jazz targets, recording revenue based on actual costs incurred relative to the budgeted costs to complete each of the respective programs. As of December 31, 2021, there are three remaining material rights outstanding under the Jazz Collaboration Agreement. In January 2022, the Company and Jazz mutually agreed to discontinue their work on NRAS. The Company classified the remaining $ 12.6 million deferred revenue allocated to this target to short-term during the 12 months ended December 31, 2021, and the Company will recognize this as revenue in the first quarter of 2022, as a result of the discontinuation. As of December 31, 2021, with the exception of NRAS, there were no significant changes in the Company's assumptions or estimates related to the costs to complete. Amounts allocated to each of the Additional Target or Program Material Right Performance Obligation, Replacement Target Material Right Performance Obligation and Backup Candidate Material Right Performance Obligations will continue to be recognized as revenue upon the earlier of when: (i) the option is exercised wherein the future goods and/or services are transferred or (ii) the option expires. As of December 31, 2021, all of the material rights are outstanding as none of the material rights have been exercised or have expired. The aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the License and Services Performance Obligations that were unsatisfied, as of December 31, 2020 was $ 50.9 million, which is expected to be recognized over the respective term of the associated Research Program and development activities for each target, through approximately 2026. The aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to all other performance obligations that were unsatisfied as of December 31, 2020 was $ 4.1 million, which is expected to be recognized upon the earlier of when the respective option is exercised or expires. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized $ 11.3 million and $ 0.6 million of revenue under the Jazz Collaboration Agreement, respectively. The aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the License and Services Performance Obligations that were unsatisfied, as of December 31, 2021 wa s $ 39.6 million, which is expected to be recognized over the respective term of the associated Research Program and development activities for each target, through approximately 2026. The aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to all other performance obligations that were unsatisfied as of December 31, 2021 was $ 4.1 million, which is expected to be recognized upon the earlier of when the respective option is exercised or expires. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020 , the Company had $ 43.7 million and $ 55.0 million, respectively, of deferred revenue related to the Company’s collaboration with Jazz which is classified as current or long-term in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets based on the expected timing of satisfaction of the underlying goods and/or services. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 , the Company incurred $ 2.5 million and $ 3.3 million of costs associated with its obligations under the arrangement with Jazz which is classified within research and development expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss Sarepta license and option agreement Agreement summary On June 17, 2020, the Company entered into a two-year Research License and Option Agreement (the Sarepta Research Agreement) with Sarepta focused on the use of exosomes for non-viral delivery of AAV, gene-editing and RNA therapeutics to address five agreed targets associated with neuromuscular diseases. Pursuant to the Sarepta Research Agreement, the Company received funding to conduct collaborative research and Sarepta had options to enter into exclusive, worldwide licenses for each of the agreed targets to develop, commercialize and manufacture therapeutic candidates developed using the Company’s engEx Platform. For each target option exercised, the Company would have been eligible to receive an option exercise fee, milestones and royalties. Each target was well-understood to be therapeutically relevant to its associated neuromuscular disease. Either party had the right to terminate the Sarepta Research Agreement upon the other party’s material breach, subject to specified notice and cure provisions. Sarepta also had the right to terminate the Sarepta Research Agreement in its entirety or in part (with respect to a particular target) for convenience at any time upon specified written notice, subject to an obligation to pay the Company’s related personnel costs for a specified period of time after the effective date of termination as well as to pay for any unavoidable costs as a result of the termination. Expiration or termination of the Sarepta Research Agreement would not affect the rights and obligations of the parties that accrued prior to the expiration or termination date. Upon termination of the Sarepta Research Agreement, the license and options granted by the Company to Sarepta would immediately terminate. On October 1, 2021, Sarepta notified the Company that it was terminating early the two-year Research License and Option Agreement, dated June 17, 2020, between Sarepta and the Company. The termination was effective as of D |