Daniel F. Duchovny
April 8, 2019
Page 2
1. | Please file any relevant excerpts from your Schedule 14D-9 as soliciting materials in connection with your current solicitation of proxies |
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company will file the disclosure contained in the section entitled “Reasons for the Recommendation” in Item 4 of the Schedule 14D-9 (as amended by Amendment No. 1) as soliciting materials. The Company’s investor presentation filed as Exhibit (a)(3) to Amendment No. 1 and revised slides to such investor presentation filed as Exhibit (a)(4) to Amendment No. 1 have previously been filed with the Commission as soliciting material on April 1, 2019 and April 8, 2019, respectively.
2. | We note your disclosure that your board believes the Offer Price is below the price that prospective acquirors would be willing to pay for Versum. Revise your disclosure to describe the basis for your disclosure. Also, provide us supplementally a copy of the presentation from your financial advisor referenced in this disclosure. |
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has added responsive disclosure on page 4. The Company respectfully informs the Staff that a copy of a confidential board presentation prepared by Lazard Frères & Co. LLC (“Lazard”) and presented to the Company’s board of directors at its meeting on March 22, 2019 and a copy of a confidential board presentation prepared by Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“Citi”) and presented to the Company’s board of directors at its meeting on March 22, 2019, in each case in connection with each firm’s respective analysis of the Initial Merck Proposal, are being provided directly to the Staff by Latham & Watkins LLP, counsel to Lazard, and Shearman & Sterling LLP, counsel to Citi, under separate cover on a confidential and supplemental basis pursuant to Rule 12b-4 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such presentations are being provided together with a request that they be returned promptly following completion of the Staff’s review thereof. By separate letter, requests for confidential treatment of these presentations pursuant to 17 C.F.R. §200.83 have been made by Latham & Watkins LLP, counsel to Lazard, and Shearman & Sterling LLP, counsel to Citi. Lazard and Citi each subsequently confirmed to the Company’s board of directors at its meeting on March 28, 2019 that their respective financial analyses of the Initial Merck Proposal applied equally to the Offer Price.
3. | We note your disclosure in the last paragraph of page 28 that you refer to certain benefits expected from the combination with Entegris. Please revise your disclosure to quantify those benefits. |
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has added responsive disclosure on page 4.
4. | Refer to the disclosure in the first paragraph of page 31 that the conditions of the offer make it easy for Merck to abandon the offer. Revise your disclosure to clarify that Merck’s offer is required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations. Also, with a view toward revised disclosure, provide us support for your suggestion that Merck intends to terminate the offer using a pretext. |
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has added responsive disclosure on page 5. The Company has revised the disclosure to avoid any suggestion that Merck intends to terminate the Offer using a pretext and to clarify that the fact that many of the conditions to the Offer are broad and are subject to Merck’s sole discretion, and some conditions are not qualified by any materiality standard, make it possible for Merck to determine that a condition is not satisfied and decline to close the Offer (subject to compliance with the terms of the Offer and all relevant laws and regulations).