Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Refer to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on March 22, 2019, as certain note disclosures contained in such audited financial statements have been omitted from these interim condensed consolidated financial statements. Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the accounts of Highlands and its consolidated subsidiaries. Highlands consolidates its wholly-owned subsidiaries and any other entities which it controls (i) through voting rights or similar rights or (ii) by means other than voting rights if Highlands is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). The portions of the equity and net income of consolidated subsidiaries that are not attributable to the Company are presented separately as amounts attributable to non-controlling interests in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Entities which Highlands does not control and entities which are VIEs in which Highlands is not a primary beneficiary, if any, are accounted for under appropriate GAAP. Highlands' subsidiaries generally consist of limited liability companies (“LLCs”). The effects of all significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Variable Interest Entities A VIE is an entity that either (i) has insufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or (ii) has equity investors who lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. Under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810 - Consolidation, an entity that holds a variable interest in a VIE and meets certain requirements would be considered to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE and is required to consolidate the VIE in its consolidated financial statements. In order to be considered the primary beneficiary of a VIE, an entity must hold a variable interest in the VIE and have both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE, and the right to receive benefits from, or the obligation to absorb losses of, the VIE that could be potentially significant to the VIE. See Note 3 for additional discussion of the Company's consolidated variable interest entity. Revenue Recognition The Company commences revenue recognition on our leases based on a number of factors. In most cases, revenue recognition under a lease begins when the lessee takes possession of, or controls, the physical use of the leased asset. Generally, this occurs on the lease commencement date. The determination of who is the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements determines the nature of the leased asset and when revenue recognition under a lease begins. If we are the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements, then the leased asset is the finished space and revenue recognition begins when the lessee takes possession of the finished space, typically when the improvements are substantially complete. If we conclude we are not the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements (the lessee is the owner), then the leased asset is the unimproved space and any tenant improvement allowances funded under the lease are treated as lease incentives which reduces revenue recognized over the term of the lease. In these circumstances, we begin revenue recognition when the lessee takes possession of the unimproved space for the lessee to construct their own improvements. We consider a number of different factors to evaluate whether the Company or the lessee is the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes. These factors include: • whether the lease stipulates how and on what a tenant improvement allowance may be spent; • whether the tenant or landlord retains legal title to the improvements; • the uniqueness of the improvements; • the expected economic life of the tenant improvements relative to the length of the lease; and • who constructs or directs the construction of the improvements. The determination of who owns the tenant improvements, for accounting purposes, is subject to significant judgment. In making that determination, we consider all of the above factors. No one factor, however, necessarily establishes its determination. Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of each lease. The difference between rental income earned on a straight-line basis and the cash rent due under the provisions of the lease agreements is recorded as deferred rent receivable and is included as a component of accounts and rents receivable in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Rental income lease related receivables, which include contractual amounts accrued and unpaid from tenants and accrued straight-line rents receivable, are reduced for credit losses. Such amounts are recognized as a reduction to real estate rental revenues. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) clarified in July 2019 that, under ASC 842, lessors can continue to recognize a reserve (i.e., allowance for uncollectible operating lease receivables) under the loss contingency guidance in ASC 450-20 after applying the collectibility guidance in ASC 842. We evaluate the collectability of lease receivables monthly using several factors including a lessee’s creditworthiness. We recognize the credit loss on lease related receivables when, in the opinion of management, collection of substantially all lease payments is not probable. When collectability is determined not probable, any lease income subsequent to recognizing the credit loss is limited to the lesser of the lease income reflected on a straight-line basis or cash collected. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in an adjustment of $92 to rental income and property operating expenses, associated with lease related receivables where collection of substantially all operating lease payments is not probable as of January 1, 2019. There were no material changes to that assessment as of September 30, 2019. The Company records lease termination income if there is a signed termination agreement, all of the conditions of the agreement have been met and amounts due are considered collectible. Real Estate We allocate the purchase price of real estate to land, building, other building improvements, tenant improvements, and intangible assets and liabilities (such as the value of above- and below-market leases, in-place leases and origination costs associated with in-place leases). The values of above- and below-market leases are recorded as intangible assets, net, and intangible liabilities, net, respectively, in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, and are amortized as either a decrease (in the case of above-market leases) or an increase (in the case of below-market leases) to rental income over the remaining term of the associated tenant lease. The values associated with in-place leases are recorded in intangible assets, net in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and are amortized to depreciation and amortization expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income over the remaining lease term.The difference between the contractual rental rates and our estimate of market rental rates is measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the leases, including below-market renewal options for which exercise of the renewal option appears to be reasonably assured. The remaining term of leases with renewal options at terms below market reflect the assumed exercise of such below-market renewal options and assume the amortization period would coincide with the extended lease term.We perform, with the assistance of a third-party certified valuation specialist, the following procedures for properties we acquire: • Estimate the value of the property “as if vacant” as of the acquisition date; • Allocate the value of the property among land, building, and other building improvements and determine the associated useful life for each; • Calculate the value and associated life of above- and below-market leases on a tenant-by-tenant basis. The difference between the contractual rental rates and our estimate of market rental rates is measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the leases (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired, including geographical location, size of leased area, tenant profile and credit risk); • Estimate the fair value of the tenant improvements, legal expenses and leasing commissions incurred to obtain the leases and calculate the associated useful life for each; • Estimate the fair value of assumed debt, if any, and value the favorable or unfavorable debt position acquired; and • Estimate the intangible value of the in-place leases based on lease execution costs of similar leases as well as lost rent payments during an assumed lease-up period and their associated useful lives on a tenant-by-tenant basis. We recognize gains and losses from sales of investment properties and land in accordance with FASB ASC 610-20, “Gains and Losses From the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets.” We recognize gains and losses from sales of investment properties and land when we transfer control of a property and when it is probable that we will collect substantially all of the related consideration. Capitalization and Depreciation Real estate is reflected at cost less accumulated depreciation. Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Building and other improvements are depreciated based upon estimated useful lives of 30 years for building and improvements and 5 - 15 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment and site improvements. Tenant improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the life of the tenant improvement or the lease term as a component of depreciation and amortization expense. Leasing fees are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease as a component of depreciation and amortization expense. Loan fees are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the life of the related loan as a component of interest expense. Direct and indirect costs that are clearly related to the construction and improvements of investment properties are capitalized. Costs incurred for property taxes and insurance are capitalized during periods in which activities necessary to get the asset ready for its intended use are in progress. Interest costs are also capitalized during such periods. Assets Held for Sale In determining whether to classify an investment property as held for sale, the Company considers whether: (i) management has committed to a plan to sell the investment property; (ii) the investment property is available for immediate sale, in its present condition; (iii) the Company has initiated a program to locate a buyer; (iv) the Company believes that the sale of the investment property is probable; (v) the Company has received a significant non-refundable deposit for the purchase of the property; (vi) the Company is actively marketing the investment property for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its fair value; and (vii) actions required for the Company to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that any significant changes will be made to the plan. If all of the above criteria are met, the Company classifies the investment property as held for sale. On the day that these criteria are met, the Company suspends depreciation on the investment properties held for sale, including depreciation for tenant improvements and additions, as well as on the amortization of acquired in-place leases. The investment properties and liabilities associated with those investment properties that are held for sale are classified separately on the condensed consolidated balance sheets for the most recent reporting period and recorded at the lesser of the carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. There were no assets held for sale on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Impairment The Company assesses the carrying values of the respective long-lived assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable, such as a reduction in the expected holding period of the asset. If it is determined that the carrying value is not recoverable because the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed carrying value, the Company records an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value exceeds fair value. The valuation and possible subsequent impairment of investment properties is a significant estimate that can and does change based on the Company’s continuous process of analyzing each asset and reviewing assumptions about uncertain inherent factors, as well as the economic condition of the asset at a particular point in time. The use of projected future cash flows and related holding period is based on assumptions that are consistent with the estimates of future expectations and the strategic plan the Company uses to manage its underlying business. However, assumptions and estimates about future cash flows and capitalization rates are complex and subjective. Changes in economic and operating conditions and the Company’s ultimate investment intent that occur subsequent to the impairment analyses could impact these assumptions and result in future impairment charges of the real estate assets. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. This ASU modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. The ASU removes the requirement to disclose: the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; the policy for timing of transfers between levels; and the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. Our effective date for adoption of this guidance is our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2020 with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect that this guidance will have on our condensed consolidated financial statements. Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”), which established ASC 842, Leases, which introduces a lessee model that brings most leases on the balance sheet and, among other changes, eliminates the requirement in current GAAP for an entity to use bright-line tests in determining lease classification. ASC 842 allows for several practical expedients which permit the following: no reassessment of lease classification or initial direct costs; use of the standard’s effective date as the date of initial application; and no separation of non-lease components from the related lease components and, instead, to account for those components as a single lease component if certain criteria are met. We elected these practical expedients, upon adoption, on January 1, 2019, using the effective date as our date of initial application and no transition adjustment was recognized. Therefore, financial information and disclosures under ASC 842 will not be provided for periods prior to January 1, 2019. The Company elected the practical expedient, among others, to not separate lease and non-lease components for all qualifying leases. Due to the new standard’s narrowed definition of initial direct costs, beginning January 1, 2019, the Company recognizes expense as incurred on certain lease origination costs previously capitalized and amortized to expense over the lease term. Any costs no longer qualifying as initial direct costs are an increase to property operating expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income in the period of adoption and prospectively. As a lessee, beginning January 1, 2019, the Company recognized a right-of-use asset and lease liability included in deferred costs and other assets and other liabilities, respectively, with a balance as of September 30, 2019 , on the condensed consolidated balance sheets of approximately $300 , which was estimated by utilizing an average discount rate of approximately 4.5% , reflecting the Company's incremental borrowing rate. These estimates are based on the Company’s ground lease arrangement as of September 30, 2019 . As a lessor, the Company believes that substantially all of the Company's leases will continue to be classified as operating leases under the new standard and will continue to record revenues from rental properties on a straight-line basis. However, certain ground, anchor, and other long-term leases entered into or acquired have an increased likelihood of being classified as either sales-type or finance-type leases. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU No. 2016-15 addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing diversity in practice. The cash flow issues include debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs and proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims. The Company adopted ASU No. 2016-15 effective January 1, 2018. The impact to the statements of cash flows within the condensed consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 , respectively, was not material. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Classification and Presentation of Restricted Cash in the Statement of Cash Flows. ASU No. 2016-18 requires an explanation in the cash flow statement of a change in the total of (1) total cash, (2) cash equivalents, and (3) restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. The Company adopted ASU No. 2016-18 effective January 1, 2018, the effects of which include presenting restricted cash and escrows with cash and cash equivalents in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company is required to escrow cash balances for specific uses stipulated by certain of its lenders and other various agreements. As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 , the Company’s cash balances restricted for these uses were $ 4,419 and $ 3,229 , respectively. The inclusion of restricted cash increased cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, at the beginning of the year, in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows by $3,229 and $2,155 as of January 1, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, by $ 4,419 and $3,229 , as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 , respectively. September 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 Cash and cash equivalents $ 116,335 $ 80,512 Restricted cash 4,419 3,229 Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $ 120,754 $ 83,741 In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, Other Income—Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets. As it relates to gains on sale of real estate, we will apply the provisions of ASC 610-20, Gain or Loss From Derecognition of Non-financial Assets (ASC 610-20), and we expect to recognize any gains when we transfer control of a property and when it is probable that we will collect substantially all of the related consideration. The adoption of ASC 610-20 on January 1, 2018 did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements. In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This ASU is intended to simplify aspects of share-based compensation issued to non-employees by making the guidance consistent with the accounting for employee share-based compensation. It is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The adoption of ASU No. 2018-07 on January 1, 2019 did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements. |