UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act filenumber: 811-21869
NEXPOINT HEALTHCARE OPPORTUNITIES FUND
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
300 Crescent Court
Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75201
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip code)
NexPoint Advisors, L.P.
300 Crescent Court
Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75201
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (866)351-4440
Date of fiscal year end: December 31
Date of reporting period: December 31, 2018
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
A copy of the Annual Report transmitted to shareholders pursuant toRule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), is attached herewith.
NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund
Annual Report
December 31, 2018
NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Economic and market conditions change frequently.
There is no assurance that the trends described in this report will continue or commence.
Privacy Policy
We recognize and respect your privacy expectations, whether you are a visitor to our web site, a potential shareholder, a current shareholder or even a former shareholder.
Collection of Information.We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources:
| • | | Account applications and other forms, which may include your name, address and social security number, written and electronic correspondence and telephone contacts; |
| • | | Web site information, including any information captured through the use of “cookies”; and |
| • | | Account history, including information about the transactions and balances in your accounts with us or our affiliates. |
Disclosure of Information.We may share the information we collect with our affiliates. We may also disclose this information as otherwise permitted by law. We do not sell your personal information to third parties for their independent use.
Confidentiality and Security of Information.We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to our employees and agents who need to know such information to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to guard your nonpublic personal information, although you should be aware that data protection cannot be guaranteed.
PORTFOLIO MANAGER COMMENTARY (unaudited)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
Performance Review
The NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund was launched in June 2018. This fund focuses to generate a total return consisting of current income and longer-term capital appreciation. During the course of 2018, the fund had limited invested capital so performance was skewed by a few individual investments. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, the NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund Class C (the “Fund”) had a total return of-25.25%. Since the launch of the Fund, the healthcare sector has experienced mixed results with the Health Care Select Sector Index (IXV) up 5.16%, the SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) down 23.68% and the S&P Leveraged Loan Total Return Index (SPDAL) down 1.55%.
Manager’s Discussion
Over the first 9 months of 2018, the healthcare sector performed well due to a number of contributing factors, including tax reform, renewed M&A activity and continued innovation by biotechnology companies. The last quarter of the year was characterized by a strongrisk-off environment where all stock movements were highly correlated on the downside and leverage loans reacted similarly. We don’t believe market fundamentals warrant the strong price movements that were observed and we look to the fundamentals in 2019 to drive investment performance.
While tax reform and M&A provided a tailwind to equity valuations in 2018, certain subsectors came under pressure at times due to the threat of emerging competition from the likes of Amazon (AMZN) and due to Trump’s persistent call for lower drug prices. We continue to monitor these risks, but we believe the overall environment for healthcare investments remains favorable. In selecting opportunities, we believe the central tenant for a successful healthcare investment is selecting companies that either significantly improve patient care or reduce treatment costs.
In late 2017, the Republican led Congress passed tax reform which benefited companies across the healthcare sector. In particular, due to their largely domestic business mix, many companies in the healthcare services sector saw their tax rates go from the mid 30% range down to 21% or lower. Although the tax savings may be aone-time tailwind for growth, there are other benefits of tax reform that should continue to be favorable for equities. In particular, the ability to repatriate cash without penalty will help many of the large pharma companies to more effectively deploy capital. This may come in the form of increased M&A or simply an increase in share repurchases. We have already seen a significant pickup in the latter and expect the former may pick up as well over the course of 2019.
Following the Department of Justice ruling in early 2017 that two large managed care transactions (AET/HUM and ANTM/CI) were deemed anti-competitive, some investors wondered if those decisions would stifle future M&A activity, especially among service companies. Activity in the healthcare services sector didn’t remain quiet for long. Instead of pursuing horizontal integration, key players in the industry pursued vertical integration. Payers and providers (physicians, surgery centers, outpatient clinics, etc.) are increasingly joining forces to better manage patient care. Two large vertical integration deals highlighting these trends (CVS/AET and CI/ESRX) closed in late 2018.
Within the biotech sector, stock performance was driven by new innovation. Gene and cellular therapy has come of age with a number of high profile, positive data readouts. Following the acquisition of Kite Pharm (KITE) in late 2017, its key competitor Juno Therapeutics (JUNO) was acquired in 2018. Both acquisitions were valued in the$9-12B range. Although there are many companies developing exciting therapies, we believe stock performance will continue to be dictated by clinical success. One technology that has garnered a lot of excitement is the gene editing space where some company valuations have surpassed $3B before any drug has even made it into a single human subject. While we share enthusiasm for the potential of the technology, we believe valuations for the gene editing space were stretched and even at current prices the market is pricing in a high probability of success. In summary, over the coming months, we expect the biotechnology sector will continue to flourish as a result of significant scientific advances. We expect the sector may see an increase in M&A activity as large biotech companies that are flush with cash but experiencing slowingtop-line growth pursue acquisitions to replenish their drug pipelines.
The key risks for the sector over the coming year include thelead-in to the 2020 Presidential election where additional momentum by the Democrats could be viewed as negative to healthcare providers and drug companies alike. Some Democrats have proposed greater expansion of Medicaid and a movement toward a single payer environment. The other wild card is implementation of Trump’s Blueprint for lowering drug costs and whether newly elected House Democrats can gain traction in reigning in drug pricing. Trump has already instilled fear within the drug supply chain due to his desire to improve pricing transparency and lower patient’sout-of-pocket drug cost. Many believe this will lead to greater scrutiny of the Pharmacy Benefit Managers’ (PBMs) drug rebate model and result in significant changes. This fear comes at a time where there is also concern that Amazon, someone who has proven to be a disruptive force, is looking to increase its presence in the pharmacy business.
PORTFOLIO MANAGER COMMENTARY (unaudited)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
Competitive pressures will always exist. The key is to identify the companies that will play a critical role in lowering healthcare costs and in driving improved patient outcomes. We believe medical advances will continue to contribute to long-term secular growth and anticipate healthcare will remain one of the best performing sectors. The aging baby boomers represents a demographic shift that will continue to favor this sector for many years to come. New product innovation and improved models of care will provide exciting opportunities for investment within the healthcare sector.
PORTFOLIO MANAGER COMMENTARY (unaudited)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | Total Returns | |
| | Class A | | | Class C | |
| | Without Sales Charge | | | With Sales Charge | | | Without Sales Charge | | | With Sales Charge | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period Ended December 31, 2018 | | | -25.10 | % | | | -29.41 | % | | | -25.25 | % | | | -26.00 | % |
| | | | |
Five Year | | | n/a | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | |
| | | | |
Since Inception: | | | -25.10 | % | | | -29.41 | % | | | -25.25 | % | | | -26.00 | % |
| | | | |
(May 29, 2018) for Class A and C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Returns shown in the chart and table do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or on the sale of the Fund shares.
“Without Sales Charge” returns do not include sales charges or contingent deferred sales charges (“CDSC”). “With Sales Charge” returns reflect the maximum sales charge of 5.75% on Class A Shares. The CDSC on Class C Shares is 1.00% within 18 months after purchase; there is no CDSC on Class C Shares thereafter. The performance data quoted represents past performance and is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s share when redeemed may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. For performance data current to the most recentmonth-end, please visit our website at www.nexpointres.com. The gross annualized expense ratios of the Fund are: Class A: 81.98% and Class C: 76.79% Performance results reflect any contractual waivers and/or reimbursements of fund expenses by the Investment Adviser. Absent this limitation, performance results would have been lower.
See Notes to Performance on page 1 for more information.
Stock and bond prices may fall or fail to rise over time for several reasons, including general financial market conditions, factors related to a specific issuer or industry and, with respect to bond prices, changing market perceptions of the risk of default and changes in government intervention. These factors may also lead to increased volatility and reduced liquidity in the bond markets. The Fund may invest in foreign securities which may cause more volatility and less liquidity due to currency changes, political instability and accounting differences.
Interval fund investing involves risk including the possible loss of principal.
FUND PROFILE (unaudited)
| | |
| |
As of December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund’s investment objective is to seek total return consisting of current income and longer- term capital appreciation.
Net Assets as of December 31, 2018
$0.1 million
Portfolio Data as of December 31, 2018
The information below provides a snapshot of NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund at the end of the reporting period. NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund is actively managed and the composition of its portfolio will change over time. Current and future holdings are subject to risk.
| | | | |
| |
Top 5 Sectors as of 12/31/2018 (%)(1) | | | |
| |
Biotechnology | | | 23.5 | |
| |
Life Sciences Tools & Services | | | 16.2 | |
| |
Pharmaceuticals | | | 13.9 | |
| |
Managed Healthcare | | | 10.8 | |
Healthcare Equipment | | | 5.8 | |
| | | | |
| |
Top 10 Holdings as of 12/31/2018 (%)(1) | | | |
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. (Common Stocks) | | | 7.0 | |
Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Common Stocks) | | | 6.5 | |
Humana, Inc. (Common Stocks) | | | 6.4 | |
Amarin Corp. PLC (Common Stocks) | | | 6.1 | |
Abbott Laboratories (Common Stocks) | | | 5.8 | |
Heron Therapeutics, Inc. (Common Stocks) | | | 5.4 | |
LHC Group, Inc. (Common Stocks) | | | 5.4 | |
Acadia Healthcare Co., Inc. (Common Stocks) | | | 5.2 | |
Amgen, Inc. (Common Stocks) | | | 5.2 | |
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (Common Stocks) | | | 5.0 | |
(1) | Sectors and holdings are calculated as a percentage of total net assets. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
A guide to understanding the Fund’s financial statements
| | |
Investment Portfolio | | The Investment Portfolio details the Fund’s holdings and their market value as of the last day of the reporting period. Portfolio holdings are organized by type of asset and industry to demonstrate areas of concentration and diversification. |
| |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | | This statement details the Fund’s assets, liabilities, net assets and share price for each share class as of the last day of the reporting period. Net assets are calculated by subtracting all of a Fund’s liabilities (including any unpaid expenses) from the total of the Fund’s investment and noninvestment assets. The net asset value per share for each class is calculated by dividing net assets allocated to that share class by the number of shares outstanding in that class as of the last day of the reporting period. |
| |
Statement of Operations | | This statement reports income earned by the Fund and the expenses incurred by the Fund during the reporting period. The Statement of Operations also shows any net gain or loss the Fund realized on the sales of its holdings during the period as well as any unrealized gains or losses recognized over the period. The total of these results represents the Fund’s net increase or decrease in net assets from operations. |
| |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | | This statement details how the Fund’s net assets were affected by its operating results, distributions to shareholders and shareholdertransactions (e.g., subscriptions, redemptions and distribution reinvestments) during the reporting period. The Statement of Changes in Net Assets also details changes in the number of shares outstanding. |
| |
Financial Highlights | | The Financial Highlights demonstrate how the Fund’s net asset value per share was affected by the Fund’s operating results. The Financial Highlights also disclose the classes’ performance and certain key ratios (e.g., net expenses and net investment income as a percentage of average net assets). |
| |
Notes to Financial Statements | | These notes disclose the organizational background of the Fund certain of their significant accounting policies (including those surrounding security valuation, income recognition and distributions to shareholders), federal tax information, fees and compensation paid to affiliates and significant risks and contingencies |
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
| | |
| |
As of December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Shares | | Value ($) | |
|
| Common Stocks - 80.8% | |
|
| HEALTHCARE - 80.8% | |
|
| Biotechnology - 23.5% | |
| 500 | | | Amarin Corp. PLC ADR (a) | | | 6,805 | |
| 30 | | | Amgen, Inc. | | | 5,840 | |
| 235 | | | Heron Therapeutics, Inc. (a) | | | 6,096 | |
| 235 | | | Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (a) | | | 4,587 | |
| 760 | | | TG Therapeutics, Inc. (a) | | | 3,116 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | 26,444 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| Healthcare Equipment - 5.8% | |
| 90 | | | Abbott Laboratories | | | 6,510 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| Healthcare Facilities (a) - 5.2% | |
| 225 | | | Acadia Healthcare Co., Inc. | | | 5,785 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| Healthcare Services (a) - 5.4% | |
| 65 | | | LHC Group, Inc. | | | 6,102 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| Life Sciences Tools & Services - 16.2% | |
| 20 | | | Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Class A (a) | | | 4,644 | |
| 50 | | | Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (a) | | | 5,659 | |
| 35 | | | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | | | 7,833 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | 18,136 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| Managed Healthcare - 10.8% | |
| 25 | | | Humana, Inc. | | | 7,162 | |
| 43 | | | Molina Healthcare, Inc. (a) | | | 4,997 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | 12,159 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| Pharmaceuticals (a) - 13.9% | |
| 110 | | | Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | | | 3,971 | |
| 425 | | | Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. | | | 7,297 | |
| 850 | | | Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | | | 4,361 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | 15,629 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | 90,765 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Total Common Stocks (Cost $118,021) | | | 90,765 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Total Investments - 80.8%
| | | 90,765 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| (Cost $118,021) | | | | |
| Other Assets & Liabilities, Net - 19.2% | | | 21,529 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Net Assets - 100.0% | | | 112,294 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
| | |
ADR | | American Depositary Receipt |
PLC | | Public Limited Company |
| | | | | | |
6 | | | | | | See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. |
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
| | |
| |
As of December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
| | | | |
| | ($) | |
Assets | | | | |
Investments, at value (cost $118,021) | | | 90,765 | |
| | | | |
Total Investments, at value | | | 90,765 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 56,246 | |
Receivable for: | | | | |
Receivable from Investment Adviser (Note 5) | | | 12,188 | |
Dividend | | | 18 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | 17,960 | |
| | | | |
Total assets | | | 177,177 | |
| | | | |
| |
Liabilities | | | | |
Payable for: | | | | |
Transfer agent fees | | | 24,923 | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 196 | |
Distribution and shareholder service fees (Note 5) | | | 2 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | 39,762 | |
| | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 64,883 | |
| | | | |
Net Assets | | | 112,294 | |
| | | | |
| |
Net Assets Consist of: | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | 131,560 | |
Total distributable earnings/(accumulated losses) | | | (19,266 | ) |
| | | | |
Net Assets | | | 112,294 | |
| | | | |
| |
Class A: | | | | |
Net assets | | | 63,464 | |
Shares outstanding (unlimited shares authorized) | | | 4,236 | |
| | | | |
Net asset value per share(a) | | | 14.98 | |
| | | | |
Maximum offering price per share(b) | | | 15.89 | |
| | | | |
| |
Class C: | | | | |
Net assets | | | 48,830 | |
Shares outstanding (unlimited shares authorized) | | | 3,266 | |
| | | | |
Net asset value and offering price per share | | | 14.95 | |
| | | | |
(a) | Purchases of $500,000 or more are subject to a 1.00%CDSC if redeemed within eighteen months of purchase. |
(b) | The sales charge is 5.75%. On sales of $500,000 or more, there is no sales charge and therefore the offering will be lower. |
| | | | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. | | | | | | 7 |
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
| | |
| |
For the period from May 29, 2018 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
| | | | |
| | ($) | |
Investment Income | | | | |
Income: | | | | |
Dividends | | | 1,467 | |
Interest | | | 20,234 | |
| | | | |
Total Income | | | 21,701 | |
| | | | |
| |
Expenses: | | | | |
Investment advisory (Note 5) | | | 16,350 | |
Distribution and shareholder service fees: (Note 5) | | | | |
Class A | | | 92 | |
Class C | | | 319 | |
Audit fees | | | 35,000 | |
Transfer agent fees | | | 24,962 | |
Reports to shareholders | | | 20,000 | |
Accounting services fees | | | 4,993 | |
Legal fees | | | 4,680 | |
Trustees fees (Note 5) | | | 623 | |
Insurance | | | 95 | |
Other | | | 1,331 | |
| | | | |
Total operating expenses before waiver and reimbursement (Note 5) | | | 108,445 | |
Less: Expenses waived or borne by the investment Adviser | | | (80,252 | ) |
| | | | |
Net operating expenses | | | 28,193 | |
| | | | |
Net investment loss | | | (6,492 | ) |
| | | | |
| |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | | | | |
Realized gain (loss) on: | | | | |
Investments | | | (195,021 | ) |
Change unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | | | | |
Investments | | | (27,256 | ) |
| | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | | (222,277 | ) |
| | | | |
Total decrease in net assets resulting from operations | | | (228,769 | ) |
| | | | |
| | | | | | |
8 | | | | | | See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | |
| |
| | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
| | | | |
| | For the period from May 29, 2018 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2018 ($) | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Operations: | | | | |
Net investment loss | | | (6,492 | ) |
Net realized loss on investments | | | (195,021 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | | | (27,256 | ) |
| | | | |
Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations | | | (228,769 | ) |
| | | | |
Decrease in net assets from operations | | | (228,769 | ) |
| | | | |
| |
Share transactions: | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | |
Class A | | | 82,500 | |
Class C | | | 65,000 | |
Class Z(a) | | | 5,001,000 | |
Cost of shares redeemed Class Z(a) | | | (4,807,437 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase from shares transactions | | | 341,063 | |
| | | | |
Total increase in net assets | | | 112,294 | |
| |
Net Assets | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | — | |
| | | | |
End of period | | | 112,294 | |
| | | | |
(a) | Class Z Shares liquidated on August 27, 2018. |
| | | | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. | | | | | | 9 |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (continued)
| | |
| |
| | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
| | | | |
| | For the period from May 29, 2018 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2018 | |
CAPITAL STOCK ACTIVITY - SHARES | | | | |
| |
Class A: | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 4,236 | |
| | | | |
Net increase in fund shares | | | 4,236 | |
| | | | |
| |
Class C: | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 3,266 | |
| | | | |
Net increase in fund shares | | | 3,266 | |
| | | | |
| |
Class Z:(a) | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 250,050 | |
Shares redeemed | | | (250,050 | ) |
| | | | |
Net change in fund shares | | | — | |
| | | | |
(a) | Class Z Shares liquidated on August 27, 2018. |
| | | | | | |
10 | | | | | | See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
| | |
| |
| | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund, Class A |
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout each period is as follows:
| | | | |
| | For the Period Ended December 31, 2018(a) | |
| |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | | $ | 20.00 | |
| |
Income from Investment Operations: | | | | |
| |
Net investment loss(b) | | | (0.53 | ) |
| |
Net realized and unrealized loss | | | (4.49 | ) |
| | | | |
| |
Total from investment operations | | | (5.02 | ) |
| |
Net Asset Value, End of Period(c) | | $ | 14.98 | |
| |
Total Return(c)(d)(e) | | | (25.10 | )% |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: | |
| |
Net assets, end of period (in 000’s) | | $ | 63 | |
| |
Common Share Information at End of Period: | | | | |
| |
Ratios based on average net assets of common shares:(f) | | | | |
| |
Gross operating expenses(g) | | | 81.98 | % |
| |
Net investment loss | | | (5.00 | )% |
| |
Portfolio turnover rate(e) | | | 430 | % |
| |
Average commission rate paid(h) | | $ | 0.02 | 45 |
(a) | The Fund commenced operations on May 29, 2018. |
(b) | Net investment income (loss) per share was calculated using average shares outstanding during the period. |
(c) | The Net Asset Value per share and total return have been calculated based on net assets which include adjustments made in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles required at period end for financial reporting purposes. These figures do not necessarily reflect the Net Asset Value per share or total return experienced by the shareholder at period end. |
(d) | Total return is at net asset value assuming all distributions are reinvested and no initial sales charge or CDSC. For periods with waivers/reimbursements, had the Fund’s investment adviser not waived or reimbursed a portion of expenses, total return would have been lower. |
(f) | All ratios for the period have been annualized, unless otherwise indicated. |
(g) | Supplemental expense ratios are shown below: |
| | | | |
| | For the Period Ended December 31, 2018(a)(f) | |
| |
Net operating expenses (net of waiver/reimbursement, if applicable, but gross of all other operating expenses) | | | 5.92 | % |
(h) | Represents the total dollar amount of commissions paid on investment transactions divided by total number of investment shares purchased and sold for which commissions were charged. |
| | | | | | |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. | | | | | | 11 |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
| | |
| |
| | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund, Class C |
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout each period is as follows:
| | | | |
| | For the Period Ended December 31, 2018(a) | |
| |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | | $ | 20.00 | |
| |
Income from Investment Operations: | | | | |
| |
Net investment loss(b) | | | (0.58 | ) |
| |
Net realized and unrealized loss | | | (4.47 | ) |
| | | | |
| |
Total from investment operations | | | (5.05 | ) |
| |
Net Asset Value, End of Period(c) | | $ | 14.95 | |
| |
Total Return(c)(d)(e) | | | (25.25 | )% |
| |
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: | | | | |
| |
Net assets, end of period (in 000’s) | | $ | 49 | |
| |
Common Share Information at End of Period: | | | | |
| |
Ratios based on average net assets of common shares:(f) | | | | |
| |
Gross operating expenses(g) | | | 76.79 | % |
| |
Net investment loss | | | (5.36 | )% |
| |
Portfolio turnover rate(e) | | | 430 | % |
| |
Average commission rate paid(h) | | $ | 0.02 | 45 |
(a) | The Fund commenced operations on May 29, 2018. |
(b) | Net investment income (loss) per share was calculated using average shares outstanding during the period. |
(c) | The Net Asset Value per share and total return have been calculated based on net assets which include adjustments made in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles required at period end for financial reporting purposes. These figures do not necessarily reflect the Net Asset Value per share or total return experienced by the shareholder at period end. |
(d) | Total return is at net asset value assuming all distributions are reinvested and no initial sales charge or CDSC. For periods with waivers/reimbursements, had the Fund’s investment adviser not waived or reimbursed a portion of expenses, total return would have been lower. |
(f) | All ratios for the period have been annualized, unless otherwise indicated. |
(g) | Supplemental expense ratios are shown below: |
| | | | |
| | For the Period Ended December 31, 2018(a)(f) | |
| |
Net operating expenses (net of waiver/reimbursement, if applicable, but gross of all other operating expenses) | | | 6.38 | % |
(h) | Represents the total dollar amount of commissions paid on investment transactions divided by total number of investment shares purchased and sold for which commissions were charged. |
| | | | | | |
12 | | | | | | See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
Note 1. Organization
NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund (the “Fund”) is a Delaware statutory trust registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as anon-diversified,closed-end management investment company that operates as an interval fund. The Fund commenced operations on May 29, 2018. This report includes information for the period from the commencement of operations to December 31, 2018. The Fund pursues its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its total assets (defined as net assets plus the amount of any borrowing for investment purposes) in the securities of U.S. andnon-U.S. companies engaged in the healthcare industry (“Healthcare Companies”). Healthcare Companies are considered to include companies in one or more of the followingsub-sectors: pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, managed care, life science and tools, healthcare technology, healthcare services, healthcare supplies, healthcare facilities, healthcare equipment, healthcare distributors, health and wellness, cosmetics and skin care and Real Estate Investment Trusts (“REITs”) that derive their income from the ownership, leasing, or financing of properties in the healthcare sector.
Fund Shares
The Fund is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest with no par value (each a “Share” and collectively, the “Shares”). The Fund currently offers the following three share classes to investors, Class A, Class C and Class Z Shares. A fourth share class, the Class L Shares, has been registered but is not currently offered. Class A Shares are sold with afront-end sales charge. Maximum sales load imposed on purchases of Class A Shares (as a percentage of offering price) is 5.75%. There is nofront-end sales charge imposed on individual purchases of Class A Shares of $500,000 or more. Thefront-end sales charge is also waived in other instances as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Purchases of $500,000 or more of Class A Shares at net asset value (“NAV”) pursuant to a sales charge waiver are subject to a 1.00% contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) if redeemed within eighteen months of purchase. Class C Shares may be subject to a CDSC. The maximum CDSC imposed on redemptions of Class C Shares is 1.00% within the first eighteen months of purchase and 0.00% thereafter. Nofront-end or CDSCs are assessed by the Trust with respect to Class Z Shares of the Fund. Class Z shares are offered, however, effective August 27, 2018 all outstanding Class Z shares were liquidated.
Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following summarizes the significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements.
Use of Estimates
TheFund is an investment company that applies the accounting and reporting guidance of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 applicable to investment companies. The Fund’sfinancial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), which require the Investment Adviser to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters used in determining these estimates could cause actual results to differ materially.
Fund Valuation
The NAV of the Fund’s common shares is calculated daily on each day that the NYSE is open for business as of the close of the regular trading session on the NYSE, usually 4:00 PM, Eastern Time. The NAV is calculated by dividing the value of the Fund’s net assets attributable to common shares by the numbers of common shares outstanding.
Valuation of Investments
In computing the Fund’s net assets attributable to shares, securities with readily available market quotations on the NYSE, National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation (“NASDAQ”), or other nationally recognized exchange, use the closing quotations on the respective exchange for valuation of those securities. Securities for which there are no readily available market quotations will be valued pursuant to policies adopted by the Fund’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”). Typically, such securities will be valued at the mean between the most recently quoted bid and ask prices provided by the principal market makers. If there is more than one such principal market maker, the value shall be the average of such means. Securities without a sale price or quotations from principal market makers on the valuation day may be priced by an independent pricing service. Generally, loan and bond positions are not traded on exchanges and consequently are valued based on a mean of the bid and ask price from the third-party pricing services or broker-dealer sources that the Investment Adviser has determined to have the capability to provide appropriate pricing services which have been approved by the Board.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available, or for which the Fund has determined that the price
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
received from a pricing service or broker-dealer is “stale” or otherwise does not represent fair value (such as when events materially affecting the value of securities occur between the time when market price is determined and calculation of the Fund’s NAV), will be valued by the Fund at fair value, as determined by the Board or its designee in good faith in accordance with procedures approved by the Board, taking into account factors reasonably determined to be relevant, including, but not limited to: (i) the fundamental analytical data relating to the investment; (ii) the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition of the securities; and (iii) an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which these securities are purchased and sold. In these cases, the Fund’s NAV will reflect the affected portfolio securities’ fair value as determined in the judgment of the Board or its designee instead of being determined by the market. Using a fair value pricing methodology to value securities may result in a value that is different from a security’s most recent sale price and from the prices used by other investment companies to calculate their NAVs. Determination of fair value is uncertain because it involves subjective judgments and estimates.
There can be no assurance that the Fund’s valuation of a security will not differ from the amount that it realizes upon the sale of such security. Those differences could have a material impact to the Fund. The NAV shown in the Fund’s financial statements may vary from the NAV published by the Fund as of its period end because portfolio securities transactions are accounted for on the trade date (rather than the day following the trade date) for financial statement purposes.
Fair Value Measurements
The Fund has performed an analysis of all existing investments and derivative instruments to determine the significance and character of inputs to their fair value determination. The levels of fair value inputs used to measure the Fund’s investments are characterized into a fair value hierarchy. Where inputs for an asset or liability fall into more than one level in the fair value hierarchy, the investment is classified in its entirety based on the lowest level input that is significant to that investment’s valuation. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 — | Quoted unadjusted prices for identical instruments in active markets to which the Fund has access at the date of measurement; |
Level 2 — | Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, but are valued based on executed trades; broker quotations that constitute an executable price; |
| and alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. Level 2 inputs are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset in connection with market data at the measurement date; and |
Level 3 — | Model derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. In certain cases, investments classified within Level 3 may include securities for which the Fund has obtained indicative quotes from broker-dealers that do not necessarily represent prices the broker may be willing to trade on, as such quotes can be subject to material management judgment. Unobservable inputs are those inputs that reflect the Fund’s own assumptions that market participants would use to price the asset or liability based on the best available information. |
The Investment Adviser has established policies and procedures, as described above and approved by the Board, to ensure that valuation methodologies for investments and financial instruments that are categorized within all levels of the fair value hierarchy are fair and consistent. A Pricing Committee has been established to provide oversight of the valuation policies, processes and procedures, and is comprised of personnel from the Investment Adviser and its affiliates. The Pricing Committee meets monthly to review the proposed valuations for investments and financial instruments and is responsible for evaluating the overall fairness and consistent application of established policies.
As of December 31, 2018, the Fund’s investments consisted of common stocks.
The fair value of the Fund’s common stocks that are not actively traded on national exchanges are generally priced using quotes derived from implied values, indicative bids, or a limited amount of actual trades and are classified as Level 3 assets because the inputs used by the brokers and pricing services to derive the values are not readily observable.
At the end of each calendar quarter, the Investment Adviser evaluates the Level 2 and 3 assets and liabilities for changes in liquidity, including but not limited to: whether a broker is willing to execute at the quoted price, the depth and consistency of prices from third party services, and the existence of contemporaneous, observable trades in the market. Additionally, the Investment Adviser evaluates the Level 1 and 2 assets and liabilities on a quarterly basis for changes in listings or delistings on national exchanges.
Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
value, the fair value of the Fund’s investments may fluctuate from period to period. Additionally, the fair value of investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such invest-
ments and may differ materially from the values the Fund may ultimately realize. Further, such investments may be subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or otherwise less liquid than publicly traded securities.
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Transfers in and out of the levels are recognized at the value at the end of the period. A summary of the inputs used to value the Fund’s assets as of December 31, 2018 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total value at December 31, 2018 | | | Level 1 Quoted Price | | | Level 2 Significant Observable Inputs | | | Level 3 Significant Unobservable Inputs | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks | | $ | 90,765 | | | $ | 90,765 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 90,765 | | | $ | 90,765 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Security Transactions
Security transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains/(losses) on investments sold are recorded on the basis of the specific identification method for both financial statement and U.S. federal income tax purposes taking into account any foreign taxes withheld.
Income Recognition
Corporate actions (including cash dividends) are recorded on theex-dividend date, net of applicable withholding taxes, except for certain foreign corporate actions, which are recorded as soon afterex-dividend date as such information becomes available and is verified. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis.
Accretion of discount and amortization of premium on taxable bonds and loans is computed to the call date using the effective yield method. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends have been provided for in accordance with the Fund’s understanding of the applicable country’s tax rules and rates.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Status
The Fund is treated as a separate taxpayer for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Fund intends to qualify each year as a “regulated investment company” under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and will distribute substantially all of its taxable income and gains, if any, for the tax year, and as such will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes. In addition, the Fund intends to distribute, in each calendar year, all of its net investment income, capital gains and certain other amounts, if any, such that the Fund should not be subject to U.S. federal excise tax. Therefore, no U.S. federal income or excise tax provisions are recorded.
The Investment Adviser has analyzed the Fund’s tax positions taken on U.S. federal income tax returns for all open tax
years (current year), and has concluded that no provision for U.S. federal income tax is required in the Fund’s financial statements. The Fund’s U.S. federal and state income and U.S. federal excise tax returns for tax years for which the applicable statutes of limitations have not expired are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state departments of revenue. Furthermore, the Investment Adviser of the Funds is also not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next 12 months.
Distributions to Shareholders
The Fund plans to pay distributions from net investment income monthly and net realized capital gains annually to common shareholders. To permit the Fund to maintain more stable monthly distributions and annual distributions, the Fund may from time to time distribute less than the entire amount of income and gains earned in the relevant month or year, respectively. The undistributed income and gains would be available to supplement future distributions. In certain years, this practice may result in the Fund distributing, during a particular taxable year, amounts in excess of the amount of income and gains earned therein. Such distributions would result in a portion of each distribution occurring in that year to be treated as a return of capital to shareholders. Shareholders of the Fund will automatically have all distributions reinvested in Common Shares of the Fund issued by the Fund in accordance with the Fund’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the “Plan”) unless an election is made to receive cash. The number of newly issued Common Shares to be credited to each participant’s account will be determined by dividing the dollar amount of the dividend by the lesser of (i) the NAV per Common Share determined on the Declaration Date and (ii) the market price per Common Share as of the close of regular trading on the NYSE on the
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
Declaration Date. Participants in the Plan requesting a sale of securities through the plan agent of the Plan are subject to a sales fee and a brokerage commission.
Cash & Cash Equivalents
The Fund considers liquid assets deposited with a bank and certain short-term debt instruments of sufficient credit quality with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Fund also considers money market instruments that invest in cash equivalents to be cash equivalents. These investments represent amounts held with financial institutions that are readily accessible to pay Fund expenses or purchase investments. Cash and cash equivalents are valued at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates market value.
Securities Sold Short
The Funds may sell securities short. A security sold short is a transaction in which the Fund sells a security it does not own in anticipation that the market price of that security will decline. When the Fund sells a security short, it must borrow the security sold short from a broker-dealer and deliver it to the buyer upon conclusion of the transaction. A Fund may have to pay a fee to borrow particular securities and is often obligated to pay over any dividends or other payments received on such borrowed securities. In some circumstances, a Fund may be allowed by its prime broker to utilize proceeds from securities sold short to purchase additional investments, resulting in leverage. Cash held as collateral for securities sold short is classified as restricted cash on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, as applicable.
Foreign Currency
Accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Foreign currencies, investments and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates using the current 4:00 PM London Time Spot Rate. Fluctuations in the value of the foreign currencies and other assets and liabilities resulting from changes in exchange rates, between trade and settlement dates on securities transactions and between the accrual and payment dates on dividends, interest income and foreign withholding taxes, are recorded as unrealized foreign currency gains/(losses). Realized gains/(losses) and unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investment securities and income and expenses are translated on the respective dates of such transactions. The effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on investments in securities are not segregated in the Statement of Operations from the effects of changes in market prices of those securities, but are included with the net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investment securities, if applicable.
Note 3. U.S. Federal Income Tax Information
The character of income and gains to be distributed is determined in accordance with income tax regulations which may differ from U.S. GAAP. These differences include (but are not limited to) losses deferred due to wash sale transactions. Reclassifications are made to the Fund’s capital accounts to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers) under income tax regulations. These reclassifications have no impact on the NAV of the Fund. The calculation of net investment income per share in the Financial Highlights table excludes these adjustments.
For the period ended December 31, 2018, permanent differences chiefly resulting from redemptions in kind were identified and reclassified among the components of the Fund’s net assets as follows:
| | | | |
Total Distributable Earnings | | Paid-in-Capital | |
$209,503 | | $ | (209,503 | ) |
For the period ended December 31, 2018, the Fund’s most recent tax year end, components of distributable earnings on a tax basis are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Undistributed Ordinary Income | | | Accumulated Capital and Other Losses | | | Net Tax Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | |
$ | 13,965 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (33,231 | ) |
For the period ended December 31, 2018, the Fund did not have capital loss carryovers.
Unrealized appreciation and depreciation at December 31, 2018, based on cost of investments for U.S. federal income tax purposes is:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross Appreciation | | | Gross Depreciation | | | Net Appreciation/ (Depreciation)(1) | | | Cost | |
$ | 842 | | | $ | (34,073 | ) | | $ | (33,231 | ) | | $ | 123,996 | |
(1) | Any differences between book-basis andtax-basis net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) are primarily due to wash sales. |
Qualified Late Year Ordinary and Post October Losses
Under current laws, certain capital losses realized after October 31 may be deferred (and certain ordinary losses after January 1st may be deferred) and treated as occurring on the first day of the following fiscal year.
Note 4. Asset Coverage
The Fund is required to maintain 300% asset coverage with respect to any amounts borrowed. Asset coverage is calculated
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities, not including any amount representing bank borrowings and senior securities, from the Fund’s total assets and dividing the result by the principal amount of the borrowings outstanding. As of December 31, 2018, the Fund did not have any outstanding borrowings.
Note 5. Investment Advisory, Service and Distribution, Trustee and Other Fees
Investment Advisory Fee
The Investment Adviser to the Fund receives an annual fee, paid monthly, in an amount equal to 1.25% of the Fund’s Daily Gross Assets. The Fund’s “Daily Gross Assets” is an amount equal to the total assets of the Fund, including assets resulting from leverage, less any liabilities not representing leverage.
Service and Distribution Fees
Highland Capital Funds Distributor, Inc. (the “Distributer”), an affiliate of the Investment Advisor, serves as the principal underwriter and distributor of the Fund’s shares. The Distributor receives thefront-end sales charge imposed on the sale of Class A Shares and the contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) imposed on certain redemptions of Class A and Class C Shares. The Fund has adopted a “Shareholder Servicing Plan and Agreement” (the “Plan”) under which the Fund may compensate financial industry professionals for providing ongoing services in respect of clients with whom they have distributed shares of the Fund. The Plan operates in a manner consistent with Rule12b-1 under the 1940 Act, which regulates the manner in which anopen-end investment company may directly or indirectly bear the expenses of distributing its shares. Although the Fund is not anopen-end investment company, it has undertaken to comply with the terms of Rule12b-1 as a condition of an exemptive order under the 1940 Act which permits it to have a multi-class structure, CDSCs and distribution and shareholder servicing fees. Under the Plan, the Fund may incur expenses on an annual basis equal to 0.25% of the average net assets of the Class A and Class C Shares.
Class C shares will pay to the Distributor a distribution fee that will accrue at an annual rate equal to 0.75% of the Fund’s average daily net assets attributable to Class C shares and will be payable on a quarterly basis.
During the period ended December 31, 2018, approximately $409 was paid to the Distributor.
Expense Limitation Agreement
The Investment Adviser and the Fund have entered into an expense limitation and reimbursement agreement (the “Expense Limitation Agreement”) under which the Invest-
ment Adviser has agreed contractually to waive its fees and to pay or absorb the ordinary operating expenses of the Fund (including organizational and offering expenses, but excluding distribution fees, interest, dividend expenses on short sales, brokerage commissions and other transaction costs, acquired fund fees and expenses, taxes, expenses payable by the Fund for third party administration services, litigation expenses and extraordinary expenses), to the extent that they exceed 1.75% per annum of the Fund’s average Daily Gross Assets (the “Expense Limitation”). “Daily Gross Assets” is defined in the Expense Limitation Agreement as an amount equal to total assets, less any liabilities, but excluding liabilities evidencing leverage. If the Fund incurs expenses excluded from the Expense Limitation Agreement, the Fund’s expense ratio would be higher and could exceed the Expense Limitation. In consideration of the Investment Adviser’s agreement to limit the Fund’s expenses, the Fund has agreed to repay the Investment Adviser in the amount of any fees waived and Fund expenses paid or absorbed, subject to the limitations that: (1) the reimbursement for fees and expenses will be made only if payable not more than three years from the date of the reimbursement; and (2) the reimbursement may not be made if it would cause the Expense Limitation as of the time of waiver to be exceeded. The Expense Limitation Agreement will remain in effect until at least May 1, 2019 unless and until the Board approves its modification or termination. The Expense Limitation Agreement may be terminated only by the Board. After the expiration of the Expense Limitation Agreement, the agreement may be renewed at the discretion of the Investment Adviser and the Board.
On December 31, 2018, the amount subject to possible future recoupment under the Fund’s expense limitation was $80,252, and expires during the fiscal period ended December 31, 2021.
For the period ended December, 2018, the Investment Adviser did not recoup any amounts previously waived or reimbursed.
Fees Paid to Officers and Trustees
Each Trustee who is not an “interested person” of the Fund as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”) receives an annual retainer of $150,000 payable in quarterly installments and allocated among each portfolio in the Highland Fund Complex overseen by such Trustee based on relative net assets. The “Highland Fund Complex” consists of all of the registered investment companies advised by the Investment Adviser or its affiliated advisers and NexPoint Capital, Inc., aclosed-end management investment company that has elected to be treated as a business development company under the 1940 Act as of the date of this report.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
The Fund pays no compensation to its officers, all of whom are employees of the Investment Adviser or one of its affiliates.
Indemnification
Under the Fund’s organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund and, therefore, cannot be estimated.
Note 6. Repurchase of Shares
Once each quarter, the Fund will offer to repurchase at NAV no less than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Fund (the “Repurchase Offer Amount”), unless such offer is suspended or postponed in accordance with regulatory requirements. The offer to purchase shares is a fundamental policy that may not be changed without the vote of the holders of a majority of the Fund’s outstanding voting securities (as defined in the 1940 Act). Shareholders will be notified in writing of each quarterly repurchase offer and the date the repurchase offer ends (the “Repurchase Request Deadline”). Shares will be repurchased at the NAV per share determined as of the close of regular trading on the NYSE no later than the 14th day after the Repurchase Request Deadline, or the next business day if the 14th day is not a business day.
If shareholders tender for repurchase more than the Repurchase Offer Amount for a given repurchase offer, the Fund will repurchase the shares on a pro rata basis. However, the Fund may accept all shares tendered for repurchase by shareholders who own less than one hundred shares and who tender all of their shares, before prorating other amounts tendered. In addition, the Fund will accept the total number of shares tendered in connection with required minimum distributions from an IRA or other qualified retirement plan.
The Fund did not offer to repurchase any shares during the period ended December 31, 2018.
Note 7. Disclosure of Significant Risks and Contingencies
The primary risks of investing in the Fund are described below in alphabetical order:
Concentration Risk
Under normal market conditions, the Fund expects to invest at least 80% of its total assets in securities of Healthcare Companies. As a result, the Fund’s portfolio will be more sensitive to, and possibly more adversely affected by, regulatory, economic
or political factors or trends relating to the healthcare industries than a portfolio of companies representing a larger number of industries. As a result of its concentration policy, the Fund’s investments may be subject to greater risk and market fluctuation than a fund that has securities representing a broader range of investments. The Fund may occasionally make investments in any company with the objective of controlling or influencing the management and policies of that company, which could potentially make the Fund more susceptible to declines in the value of the company’s stock. The Adviser may seek control in public companies only occasionally and most often in companies with a small capitalization.
Debt Securities Risk
When the Fund invests in debt securities, the value of the investment in the Fund will fluctuate with changes in interest rates. Typically, a rise in interest rates causes a decline in the value of debt securities. In general, the market price of debt securities with longer maturities will increase or decrease more in response to changes in interest rates than shorter-term securities. Other risk factors include credit risk (the debtor may default) and prepayment risk (the debtor may pay its obligation early, reducing the amount of interest payments). These risks could affect the value of a particular investment, possibly causing the Fund’s share price and total return to be reduced or fluctuate more than other types of investments. This kind of market risk is generally greater for funds investing in debt securities with longer maturities.
Leverage Risk
The Fund may use leverage in its investment program, including the use of borrowed funds and investments in certain types of options, such as puts, calls and warrants, which may be purchased for a fraction of the price of the underlying securities. While such strategies and techniques increase the opportunity to achieve higher returns on the amounts invested, they also increase the risk of loss. To the extent the Fund purchases securities with borrowed funds, its net assets will tend to increase or decrease at a greater rate than if borrowed funds are not used. If the interest expense on borrowings were to exceed the net return on the portfolio securities purchased with borrowed funds, the Fund’s use of leverage would result in a lower rate of return than if the Fund were not leveraged.
Liquidity Risk
There is currently no secondary market for the shares and the Fund expects that no secondary market will develop. Limited liquidity is provided to shareholders only through the Fund’s quarterly repurchase offers for no less than 5% of the shares outstanding at NAV. There is no guarantee that shareholders will be able to sell all of the shares they desire in a quarterly repurchase offer.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (concluded)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
Note 8. Investment Transactions
Purchases & Sales of Securities
The cost of purchases and the proceeds from sales of investments, other than short-term securities, for the period ended December 31, 2018, were as follows:
| | |
Other Securities |
Purchases | | Sales |
$6,506,905 | | $6,196,842 |
As discussed in Note 1, 250,000 shares of Class Z were liquidated in-kind on August 27, 2018 by a non-discretionary advised account. The Fund delivered securities and cash with a total fair value of approximately $4,806,000 in connection with this in-kind liquidation.
Note 9. Significant Shareholders
The number of shareholders each owning 5% or more of the Fund is listed below. The total percentage of the Fund held by such external shareholders as well as percentage of the Fund held by certain directly and indirectly wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Investment Adviser and their affiliates (“Highland Affiliates”) at December 31, 2018 were:
| | |
Number | | % of Fund Held |
2 | | 100% |
Note 10. New Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2017, the FASB issuedAccounting Standards Update2017-08, Receivables — Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic310-20). The amendments in this update shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. For public entities this update will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Investment Adviser is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the Fund’s financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issuedAccounting Standards Update2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. The amendments in this update modify a number of disclosure requirements on fair value measurements required to be reported under Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. The amendments in this update are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Investment Adviser is currently
evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the Fund’s financial statements.
Note 11. Subsequent Events
Management has evaluated the impact of all subsequent events on the Fund through the date the financial statements were issued, and has determined that there were no subsequent events to report which have not already been recorded or disclosed in these financial statements and accompanying notes.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the investment portfolio, of NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund (the “Fund”) as of December 31, 2018, and the related statements of operations and changes in net assets and the financial highlights for the period May 29, 2018 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2018, including the related notes, (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of theFund as of December 31, 2018, the results of its operations, changes in net assets and financial highlights for the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Fund’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2018, by correspondence with the custodian. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have served as the Fund’s since 2018.
COHEN & COMPANY, LTD.
Cleveland, Ohio
March 1, 2019
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
Additional Portfolio Information
The Investment Adviser and its affiliates manage other accounts, including registered and private funds and individual accounts. Although investment decisions for the Fund are made independently from those of such other accounts, the Investment Adviser may, consistent with applicable law, make investment recommendations to other clients or accounts that may be the same or different from those made to the Fund, including investments in different levels of the capital structure of a company, such as equity versus senior loans, or that involve taking contradictory positions in multiple levels of the capital structure. The Investment Adviser has adopted policies and procedures that address the allocation of investment opportunities, execution of portfolio transactions, personal trading by employees and other potential conflicts of interest that are designed to ensure that all client accounts are treated equitably over time. Nevertheless, this may create situations where a client could be disadvantaged because of the investment activities conducted by the Investment Adviser for other client accounts. When the Fund and one or more of such other accounts is prepared to invest in, or desires to dispose of, the same security, available investments or opportunities for each will be allocated in a manner believed by the Investment Adviser to be equitable to the Fund and such other accounts. The Investment Adviser also may aggregate orders to purchase and sell securities for the Fund and such other accounts. Although the Investment Adviser believes that, over time, the potential benefits of participating in volume transactions and negotiating lower transaction costs should benefit all accounts including the Fund, in some cases these activities may adversely affect the price paid or received by the Fund or the size of the position obtained or disposed of by the Fund.
Changes of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
On November 14, 2018, KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) resigned as the independent registered public accounting firm of NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund (the “Fund”), effective on such date. On December 7, 2018, the board of trustees of the Fund (the “Board”) approved the appointment of Cohen & Company, Ltd. (“Cohen”) as the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm. Cohen was formally engaged by the Fund on December 19, 2018.
During the period from May 29, 2018 (commencement of operations) through November 14, 2018, there were no: (1) disagreements (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of RegulationS-K and the related instructions) with KPMG involving the Fund on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements if not resolved to their satisfaction would have caused them to make reference in
connection with their opinion to the subject matter of the disagreement, or (2) reportable events (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of RegulationS-K).
During the period from May 29, 2018 (commencement of operations) through November 14, 2018, neither Management, the Fund, nor anyone on its behalf, consulted Cohen regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the financial statements of the Fund, and no written report or oral advice was provided to the Fund by Cohen that Cohen concluded was an important factor considered by the Fund in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of RegulationS-K and the related instructions) or a reportable event (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of RegulationS-K).
Approval of NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund Investment Advisory Agreement
The Fund has retained NexPoint Advisors, L.P. (the “Investment Adviser”) to manage the assets of the Fund pursuant to an investment advisory agreement between the Investment Adviser and the Fund (the “Agreement”). The Agreement was initially approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, at a meeting held on February18-19, 2016.
Following the initialtwo-year term, the Agreement continues in effect fromyear-to-year, provided that such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by the vote of holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of the Fund or by the Board of Trustees and, in either event, by a majority of the Independent Trustees of the Fund casting votes in person at a meeting called for such purpose.
During telephonic meetings held on August 16, 2018 and August 28, 2018, the Board of Trustees gave preliminary consideration to information bearing on the continuation of the Agreement for aone-year period commencing November 1, 2018 with respect to the Fund. The primary objective of the meetings was to ensure that the Trustees had the opportunity to consider matters they deemed relevant in evaluating the continuation of the Agreement, and to request any additional information they considered reasonably necessary for their deliberations.
At anin-person meeting held on September16-17, 2018, the Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, approved the continuance of the Agreement for aone-year period commencing on November 1, 2018. As part of its
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (continued)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
review process, the Board of Trustees requested, through Fund counsel and its independent legal counsel, and received from the Investment Adviser, various information and written materials in connection with meetings of the Board of Trustees, including: (1) information regarding the financial soundness of the Adviser and the profitability of the Agreement to the Investment; (2) information on the advisory and compliance personnel of the Investment Adviser, including compensation arrangements; (3) information on the internal compliance procedures of the Investment Adviser; (4) comparative information showing how the Fund’s fees and operating expenses compare to those of other accounts of the Investment Adviser and comparable funds managed by unaffiliated advisers, both of which follow investment strategies similar to those of the Fund; (5) information on the investment performance of the Fund, including comparisons of the Fund’s performance against that of other registered investment companies and comparable funds that follow investment strategies similar to those of the Fund; (6) information regarding brokerage and portfolio transactions; and (7) information on any legal proceedings or regulatory audits or investigations affecting the Investment Adviser. After the August 2018 meetings, the Trustees requested that the Investment Adviser provide additional information regarding various matters. In addition, the Trustees received an independent report from Morningstar Inc. (“Morningstar”), an independent source of investment company data, relating to the Fund’s performance, volatility and expenses compared to the performance, volatility and expenses of a peer group determined by Morningstar to be comparable. The Trustees also relied on information provided at periodic meetings of the Board of Trustees over the course of the year. The Trustees reviewed various factors discussed in independent counsel’s legal memoranda regarding their responsibilities in considering the Agreement, the detailed information provided by the Investment Adviser and other relevant information and factors. The Trustees’ conclusions as to the approval of the Agreement were based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees without any single factor being dispositive in and of itself. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors.
The nature, extent, and quality of the services to be provided by the Investment Adviser
The Board of Trustees considered the portfolio management services to be provided by the Investment Adviser under the Agreement and the activities related to portfolio management, including use of technology, research capabilities, and investment management staff. The Trustees
discussed the relevant experience and qualifications of the personnel providing advisory services, including the background and experience of the members of the Fund’s portfolio management team. The Trustees reviewed the management structure, assets under management and investment philosophies and processes of the Investment Adviser. The Trustees also reviewed and discussed information regarding the Investment Adviser’s compliance policies, procedures and personnel, including portfolio manager compensation arrangements. The Trustees concluded that the Investment Adviser had the quality and depth of personnel and investment methods essential to performing their duties under the Agreement, and that the nature and the quality of such advisory services were satisfactory.
The Investment Adviser’s historical performance in managing the Fund
The Board of Trustees reviewed the historical performance of the Fund over various time periods and reflected on previous discussions regarding matters bearing on the Investment Adviser’s performance at its meetings throughout the year. With respect to the Fund, the Trustees discussed the historical performance of the Fund and contrasted the relative performance of the Fund and its portfolio management team to that of the Fund’s peers, as represented by certain other registered investment companies and comparable funds that follow investment strategies similar to the Fund, as well as comparable indices and the Fund’s applicable Morningstar category. The Trustees concluded that the Fund’s performance or other relevant factors supported the continuation of the Agreement relating to the Fund for an additionalone-year period.
Among other data relating specifically to the Fund’s performance, the Board took note of Morningstar’s explanatory note concerning its performance analysis that, when considering a benchmark, Morningstar chose the S&P 500 Healthcare benchmark as the most suitable comparison for the Fund based on the benchmark’s healthcare focus. The Board then considered that the Fund had underperformed the S&P 500 Healthcare Index for the three- and five-year periods ended June 30, 2018, underperformed the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index for theone-, three- and five-year periods ended June 30, 2018, underperformed the Morningstar peer group median for the three- and five-year periods ended June 30, 2018 and underperformed the category median for the three-year period ended June 30, 2018. The Board further noted that the Fund outperformed the S&P 500 Healthcare Index for theone-year period ended June 30, 2018, outperformed the Morningstar peer group median for theone-year period ended June 30, 2018 and outperformed the category median for theone- and three-year periods ended June 30, 2018. The Board also took into account management’s discussion of the
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (concluded)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
Fund’s performance. With respect to performance that lagged the Fund’s Morningstar peer group median, category median and/or benchmark for certain periods, the Trustees considered information provided by the Investment Adviser relating to the attribution of performance results for the Fund, including information that demonstrated that the Fund’s underperformance was attributable, to a significant extent, to investment decisions (such as security selection or sector allocation) by the Investment Adviser that were reasonable under the circumstances prevailing at the time and consistent with the Fund’s investment objective and policies.
With respect to the Fund, the Trustees concluded that the Fund’s performance and other relevant factors supported the continuation of the Agreement.
The costs of the services to be provided by the Investment Adviser and the profits to be realized by the Investment Adviser and its affiliates from their relationship with the Fund
The Board of Trustees also gave consideration to the fees payable under the Agreement, the expenses the Investment Adviser incur in providing advisory services and the profitability to the Investment Adviser from managing the Fund, including: (1) information regarding the financial condition of the Investment Adviser; (2) information regarding the total fees and payments received by the Investment Adviser for its services and, with respect to the Investment Adviser, whether such fees are appropriate given economies of scale and other considerations; (3) comparative information showing (a) the fees payable under the Agreement versus the investment advisory fees of certain registered investment companies and comparable funds that follow investment strategies similar to those of the Fund and (b) the expense ratios of the Fund versus the expense ratios of certain registered investment companies and comparable funds that follow investment strategies similar to those of the Fund; and (4) information regarding the total fees and payments received and the related amounts waived and/or reimbursed by the Investment Adviser for providing administrative services with respect to the Fund under separate agreements and whether such fees are appropriate. The Trustees also considered theso-called“fall-out benefits” to the Investment Adviser with respect to the Fund, such as the reputational value of serving as Investment Adviser to the Fund, potential fees paid to the Investment Adviser’s affiliates by the Fund or portfolio companies for services provided, including administrative services provided to the Fund by the Investment Adviser pursuant to separate agreements, the benefits of scale from investment by the Fund in affiliated funds, and the benefits of research made available to the
Investment Adviser by reason of brokerage commissions (if any) generated by the Fund’s securities transactions, and, with respect to any Fund investments in one or more other funds in the Highland fund complex, the fees paid to the Investment Adviser of the underlying Fund and its affiliates with respect to such investments. After such review, the Trustees determined that the anticipated profitability rates to the Investment Adviser with respect to the Agreement were fair and reasonable. The Trustees also took into consideration the amounts waived and/or reimbursed, if any, where expense caps or advisory fee waivers had been implemented.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of shareholders
The Board of Trustees considered the respective asset levels of the Fund over time and historical net expenses relative to such asset levels, the information provided by the Investment Adviser relating to their costs and information comparing the fee rates charged by the Investment Adviser with fee rates charged by other unaffiliated investment advisers to their clients. The Trustees concluded that the fee structures are reasonable, and with respect to the Investment Adviser, should result in a sharing of economies of scale in view of the information provided. The Board determined to continue to review ways, and the extent to which, economies of scale might be shared between the Investment Adviser, on the one hand and shareholders of the Fund on the other. The Board also requested that the Investment Adviser consider ways in which economies of scale can be shared with Fund shareholders.
Conclusion
Throughout the process, the Board of Trustees was advised by Fund counsel and independent legal counsel, and was empowered to engage such other third parties or request additional information as it deemed appropriate. Following a further discussion of the factors above and the merits of the Agreement and its various provisions, it was noted that in considering the approval of the Agreement, no single factor was determinative to the decision of the Board of Trustees. Rather, after weighing all of the factors and reasons discussed above, the Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, unanimously agreed that the Agreement, including the advisory fees to be paid to the Investment Adviser, is fair and reasonable to the Fund in light of the services that the Investment Adviser provides, the expenses that it incurs and the reasonably foreseeable asset levels of the Fund.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (continued)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
Trustees and Officers
The Board is responsible for the overall management of the Fund, including supervision of the duties performed by the Investment Adviser. The names and birth dates of the Trustees and officers of the Fund, the year each was first elected or appointed to office, their principal business occupations during the last five years, the number of funds overseen by each Trustee and other directorships they hold are shown below. The business address for each Trustee and officer of the Fund is c/o NexPoint Advisors, L.P., 300 Crescent Court, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75201.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Date of Birth | | Position(s) with the Trust | | Term of Office1 and Length of Time Served | | Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years | | Number of Portfolios in Highland Fund Complex Overseen by the Trustees2 | | Other Directorships/ Trusteeships Held During the Past Five Years | | Experience, Qualifications, Attributes, Skills for Board Membership |
|
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES |
| | | | | | |
Timothy K. Hui (6/13/1948) | | Trustee | | Indefinite Term; Trustee since inception in 2006. | | Dean of Educational Resources Emeritus and Special Assistant to the President at Cairn University since July 2018; Dean of Educational Resources at Cairn University from July 2012 until June 2018 and from July 2006 to January 2008. | | 24 | | None | | Significant experience on this board of directors/trustees; administrative and managerial experience; legal training and practice. |
| | | | | | |
Bryan A. Ward (2/4/1955) | | Trustee | | Indefinite Term; Trustee since inception in 2006. | | Private Investor, BW Consulting, LLC since 2014; Senior Manager, Accenture, LLP (a consulting firm) from 2002 until retirement in 2014. | | 24 | | Director of Equity Metrix, LLC. | | Significant experience on this and/or other boards of directors/trustees; significant managerial and executive experience; significant experience as a management consultant. |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (continued)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Date of Birth | | Position(s) with the Trust | | Term of Office1 and Length of Time Served | | Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years | | Number of Portfolios in Highland Fund Complex Overseen by the Trustees2 | | Other Directorships/ Trusteeships Held During the Past Five Years | | Experience, Qualifications, Attributes, Skills for Board Membership |
|
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES |
| | | | | | |
Dr. Bob Froehlich (4/28/1953) | | Trustee | | Indefinite Term; Trustee since December 2013. | | Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Strategist, The Hartford Mutual Funds from 2009 until retirement in 2012. | | 24 | | Trustee of ARC Realty Finance Trust, Inc. (from January 2013 to May 2016); Director of KC Concessions, Inc. (since January 2013); Trustee of Realty Capital Income Funds Trust (from January 2014 to December 2016); Director of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II (from January 2013 to June 2016); Director, American Realty Capital Daily Net Asset Value Trust, Inc. (from November 2012 to July 2016); Director of AmericanSports Enterprise, Inc. (since January 2013); Director of Davidson Investment Advisors (July 2009 to July 2016); Chairman and owner, Kane County Cougars Baseball Club (since January 2013); Advisory Board of Directors, Internet Connectivity Group, Inc. (January 2014 to April 2016); Director of AXAR Acquisition Corp. (formerly AR Capital Acquisition Corp.) (from October 2014 to October 2017); Director of The Midwest League of Professional Baseball Clubs, Inc.; Director of Kane County Cougars Foundation, Inc.; Director of Galen Robotics, Inc.; Chairman and Director of FC Global Realty, Inc. (from May 2017 to June 2018); and Chairman and Director of First Capital Investment Corp. (from March 2017 until March 2018). | | Significant experience in the financial industry; significant managerial and executive experience; significant experience on other boards of directors, including as a member of several audit committees. |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (continued)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Date of Birth | | Position(s) with the Trust | | Term of Office1 and Length of Time Served | | Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years | | Number of Portfolios in Highland Fund Complex Overseen by the Trustees2 | | Other Directorships/ Trusteeships Held During the Past Five Years | | Experience, Qualifications, Attributes, Skills for Board Membership |
|
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES |
| | | | | | |
John Honis3 (6/16/1958) | | Trustee | | Indefinite Term; Trustee since July 2013. | | President of Rand Advisors, LLC since August 2013; Partner of Highland Capital Management, L.P. (“HCM”) from February 2007 until his resignation in November 2014. | | 24 | | Manager of Turtle Bay Resort, LLC (August 2011 – December 2018); and Manager of American Home Patient (from November 2011 to February 2016). | | Significant experience in the financial industry; significant managerial and executive experience, including experience as president, chief executive officer or chief restructuring officer of five telecommunication firms; experience on other boards of directors/trustees. |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (continued)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Date of Birth | | Position(s) with the Trust | | Term of Office1 and Length of Time Served | | Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years | | Number of Portfolios in Highland Fund Complex Overseen by the Trustees2 | | Other Directorships/ Trusteeships Held During the Past Five Years | | Experience, Qualifications, Attributes, Skills for Board Membership |
|
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES |
| | | | | | |
Ethan Powell4 (6/20/1975) | | Trustee and Chairman of the Board | | Indefinite Term; Trustee since December 2013; Chairman of the Board since December 2013; and Executive Vice President and Principal Executive Officer from June 2012 until December 2015. | | President and Founder of Impact Shares LLC since December 2015; Trustee/Director of the Highland Fund Complex from June 2012 until July 2013 and since December 2013; Chief Product Strategist of Highland Capital Management Fund Advisors, L.P. (“HCMFA”) from 2012 until December 2015; Senior Retail Fund Analyst of HCM from 2007 until December 2015 and HCMFA from its inception until December 2015; President and Principal Executive Officer of NexPoint Strategic Opportunities Fund (“NHF”) from June 2012 until May 2015; Secretary of NHF from May 2015 until December 2015; Executive Vice President and Principal Executive Officer of Highland Funds I (“HFI”) and Highland Funds II (“HFII”) from June 2012 until December 2015; and Secretary of HFI and HFII from November 2010 to May 2015. | | 24 | | Trustee of Impact Shares Funds I Trust | | Significant experience in the financial industry; significant executive experience including past service as an officer of funds in the Highland Fund Complex; significant administrative and managerial experience. |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (continued)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Date of Birth | | Position(s) with the Trust | | Term of Office1 and Length of Time Served | | Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years | | Number of Portfolios in Highland Fund Complex Overseen by the Trustees2 | | Other Directorships/ Trusteeships Held During the Past Five Years | | Experience, Qualifications, Attributes, Skills for Board Membership |
|
INTERESTED TRUSTEE |
| | | | | | |
Dustin Norris5(1/6/1984) | | Trustee and Secretary | | Indefinite Term; Trustee since February 2018; and Secretary since October 2017. | | President of Highland Capital Funds Distributor, Inc. since April 2018; Head of Distribution at HCMFA since November 2017; Secretary of Highland Floating Rate Opportunities Fund (“HFRO”), Highland Global Allocation Fund (“GAF”), HFI and HFII since October 2017; Assistant Secretary of HFRO and GAF from August 2017 to October 2017; Chief Product Strategist at HCMFA since September 2015; Director of Product Strategy at HCMFA from May 2014 to September 2015; Assistant Secretary of HFI and HFII from March 2017 to October 2017; Secretary of NHF since December 2015; Assistant Treasurer of NexPoint Real Estate Advisors, L.P. since May 2015; Assistant Treasurer of NexPoint Real Estate Advisors II, L.P. since June 2016; Assistant Treasurer of HFI and HFII from November 2012 to March 2017; Assistant Treasurer of NHF from November 2012 to December 2015; Secretary of NexPoint Capital, Inc. since 2014; Secretary of NexPoint Real Estate Strategies Fund, NexPoint Strategic Income Fund, NexPoint Energy and Materials Opportunities Fund, NexPoint Discount Strategies Fund, NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund, NexPoint Event-Driven Fund and NexPoint Latin American Opportunities Fund (the “Interval Funds”) since March 2016; and Senior Accounting Manager at HCMFA from August 2012 to May 2014. | | 24 | | None | | Significant experience in the financial industry; significant managerial and executive experience, including experience as an officer of the Highland Funds Complex since 2012. |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (continued)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
| | | | | | |
Name and Date of Birth | | Position(s) with the Fund | | Term of Office and Length of Time Served | | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years |
|
OFFICERS |
| | | |
James Dondero (6/29/1962) | | President and Principal Executive Officer | | Indefinite Term; President since March 2016. | | President of Highland Capital Management, L.P., which he co-founded in 1993; Portfolio Manager of NHF, Portfolio Manager of Highland Energy MLP Fund, Highland Global Allocation Fund, Highland Small-Cap Equity Fund and Highland Premier Growth Equity Fund (all series of HFII); Portfolio Manager of Highland Opportunistic Credit Fund (series of Highland Funds I (“HFI”); and a Portfolio Manager of NexPoint Capital since 2014; President and Portfolio Manager of NexPoint Discount Yield Fund, NexPoint Energy and Materials Opportunities Fund, NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund, NexPoint Latin American Opportunities Fund, NexPoint Merger Arbitrage Fund and NexPoint Distressed Strategies Fund since 2016. |
| | | |
Frank Waterhouse (4/14/1971) | | Treasurer; Principal Accounting Officer, Principal Financial Officer | | Indefinite Term; Treasurer since March 2016. Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer since March 2016. Principal Executive Officer since March 2016. | | Principal Executive Officer of HFI, HFII, HFRO and GAF since February 2018; Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of HFRO, GAF, NexPoint Capital, Inc., NHF, HFI, HFII, and NexPoint Real Estate Advisors, L.P. since October 2017; Treasurer of HFRO and GAF since August 2017; Assistant Treasurer of Acis Capital Management, L.P. from December 2011 until February 2012; Treasurer of Acis Capital Management, L.P. since February 2012; Assistant Treasurer of HCM from November 2011 until April 2012; Treasurer of HCM since April 2012; Assistant Treasurer of HCMFA from December 2011 until October 2012; Treasurer of HCMFA since October 2012; Treasurer of NexPoint Advisors, L.P. since March 2012 and Treasurer of NexPoint Capital, Inc., NHF, HFI, HFII, and NexPoint Real Estate Advisors, L.P. since May 2015; Treasurer of NexPoint Real Estate Advisors II, L.P. since June 2016; and Treasurer of the Interval Funds since March 2016. |
| | | |
Clifford Stoops (11/17/1970) | | Assistant Treasurer | | Indefinite Term; Assistant Treasurer since March 2017. | | Assistant Treasurer of HFRO and GAF since August 2017; Assistant Treasurer of HFI, HFII, NHF, NexPoint Capital, Inc. and the Interval Funds since March 2017; and Chief Accounting Officer at HCM since December 2011. |
| | | |
Jason Post (1/7/1979) | | Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Officer | | Indefinite Term; Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Officer since March 2016. | | Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Officer of HFRO and GAF since August 2017; Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Officer of HFI, HFII, NHF and NexPoint Capital, Inc. since September 2015; Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Officer of the Interval Funds since March 2016; and Chief Compliance Officer for HCMFA and NexPoint Advisors, L.P since September 2015. Prior to this role served as Deputy Chief Compliance Officer and Director of Compliance for HCM. |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (concluded)
| | |
| |
December 31, 2018 | | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund |
| | | | | | |
Name and Date of Birth | | Position(s) with the Fund | | Term of Office and Length of Time Served | | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years |
|
OFFICERS |
| | | |
Dustin Norris5 (1/6/1984) | | Secretary and Trustee | | Indefinite Term; Secretary since March 2016. | | President of Highland Capital Funds Distributor, Inc. since April 2018; Head of Distribution at HCMFA since November 2017; Secretary of HFRO and GAF, HFI and HFII since October 2017; Assistant Secretary of HFRO and GAAF from August 2017 to October 2017; Secretary of the Interval Funds since March 2016; Chief Product Strategist at HCMFA since September 2015; Director of Product Strategy at HCMFA from May 2014 to September 2015; Secretary of NHF since December 2015; Assistant Secretary of HFI and HFII from March 2017 to October 2017; Assistant Treasurer of NexPoint Real Estate Advisors, L.P. since May 2015; Assistant Treasurer of NexPoint Real Estate Advisors II, L.P. since June 2016; Assistant Treasurer of HFI and HFII from November 2012 to March 2017; Assistant Treasurer of NHF from November 2012 to December 2015; Secretary of NexPoint Capital, Inc. since 2014; and Senior Accounting Manager at HCMFA from August 2012 to May 2014. |
1 | On an annual basis, as a matter of Board policy, the Governance Committee reviews each Trustee’s performance and determines whether to extend each such Trustee’s service for another year. Effective June 2013, the Board adopted a retirement policy wherein the Governance Committee shall not recommend the continued service as a Trustee of a Board member who is older than 80 years of age at the time the Governance Committee reports its findings to the Board. |
2 | The “Highland Fund Complex” consists of NHF, each series of HFI, each series of HFII, HFRO, GAF, the Interval Funds, and NexPoint Capital, Inc., aclosed-end management investment company that has elected to be treated as a business development company under the 1940 Act. |
3 | Since May 1, 2015, Mr. Honis has been treated as an Independent Trustee of the Trust. Prior to that date, Mr. Honis was treated as an Interested Trustee because he was a partner of an investment adviser affiliated with the Adviser until his resignation in November 2014. As of September 30, 2018, Mr. Honis was entitled to receive aggregate severance and/or deferred compensation payments of approximately $556,000 from another affiliate of the Adviser. Mr. Honis also serves as a director of a portfolio company affiliated with the Adviser. During the Trust’s last two fiscal years, Mr. Honis’ aggregate compensation from this portfolio company for his services as a director was approximately $50,000. |
| In addition, Mr. Honis serves as a trustee of a trust that owns substantially all of the economic interest in an investment adviser affiliated with the Adviser. Mr. Honis indirectly receives an asset-based fee in respect of such interest, which is projected to range from$450,000- $550,000 annually. In light of these relationships between Mr. Honis and affiliates of the Adviser, it is possible that the SEC might in the future determine Mr. Honis to be an interested person of the Trust. |
4 | Prior to December 8, 2017, Mr. Powell was treated as an Interested Trustee of the Trust for all purposes other than compensation and the Trust’s code of ethics. |
5 | On February 7, 2018, Mr. Norris was appointed as an Interested Trustee of the Trust. |
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT
Investment Adviser
NexPoint Advisors, L.P.
200 Crescent Court, Suite 700
Dallas, TX 75201
Transfer Agent
DST Systems, Inc.
210 W 10th, 8th Floor
Kansas City, MO 64105
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
One Lincoln Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02111
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Cohen & Company, Ltd.
1350 Euclid Ave., Suite 800
Cleveland, OH 44115
Fund Counsel
K&L Gates LLP
1 Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111
This report has been prepared for shareholders of NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund (the “Fund”). The Fund mails one shareholder report to each shareholder address. If you would like more than one report, please call shareholder services at1-844-485-9167 to request that additional reports be sent to you.
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to its portfolio securities, and the Fund’s proxy voting records for the most recent12-month period ended December 31, are available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling1-844-485-9167 and (ii) on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on FormN-Q. The Fund’s FormsN-Q are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and also may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling1-800-SEC-0330. Shareholders may also obtain the FormN-Q by visiting the Fund’s website at www.NexPointAdvisors.com.
As required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related SEC rules, the Fund’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer made quarterly certifications, included in filings with the SEC on FormsN-CSR andN-Q relating to, among other things, the Fund’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, as applicable.
The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and is available upon request without charge by calling1-844-485-9167.
Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, paper copies of the Fund’s annual and semi-annual shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports. Instead, the reports will be made available on the Fund’s website (highlandfunds.com), and you will be notified by mail each time a report is posted and provided with a website link to access the report.
If you already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need not take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from the Fund electronically by contacting your financial intermediary (such as a broker-dealer or bank) or, if you are a direct investor, by contacting the Fund’s transfer agent at 1-844-485-9167.
Beginning on January 1, 2019, you may elect to receive all future reports in paper free of charge. If you invest through a financial intermediary, you can contact your financial intermediary to request that you continue to receive paper copies of your shareholder reports. If you invest directly with the Fund, you can call 1-844-485-9167 to let the Fund know you wish to continue receiving paper copies of your shareholder reports. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held in your account if you invest through your financial intermediary or all funds held with the fund complex if you invest directly with a Fund.
NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund
c/o DST Systems, Inc.
P.O. Box 219630
Kansas City, MO 64121-9630
| | |
NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund | | Annual Report, December 31, 2018 |
| | |
www.nexpointadvisors.com | | NHO-AR-1218 |
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
(a) | NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund (the “Registrant”), as of the end of the period covered by this report, has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the Registrant or a third party. |
(c) | There have been no amendments, during the period covered by this report, to a provision of the code of ethics that applies to the Registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the Registrant or a third party, and that relates to any element of the code of ethics description. |
(d) | The Registrant has not granted any waiver, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the code of ethics that applies to the Registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the Registrant or a third party, that relates to one or more of the items set forth in paragraph (b) of this Item’s instructions. |
(f) | The Registrant’s code of ethics that applies to the Registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions is filed herewith as Exhibit (a)(1). |
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
As of the end of the period covered by the report, the Registrant’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”) has determined that Bryan A. Ward, a member of the Audit & Qualified Legal Compliance Committee of the Board (the “Audit Committee”), is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in Item 3 ofForm N-CSR. Mr. Ward is “independent” as defined by the SEC for purposes of this Item 3 ofForm N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Audit Fees
(a) | The aggregate fees billed since inception on May 29, 2018 for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the Registrant’s annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements are $17,500 for the period ended December 31, 2018. |
Audit-Related Fees
(b) | The aggregate fees billed since inception on May 29, 2018 for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the Registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item are $10,000 for the period ended December 31, 2018. The nature of the services related to agreed-upon procedures, performed on the Registrant’s semi-annual financial statements. |
1
Tax Fees
(c) | The aggregate fees billed since inception on May 29, 2018 for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning are $4,500 for the period year ended December 31, 2018. The nature of the services related to assistance on the Registrant’s tax returns and excise tax calculations. |
All Other Fees
(d) | The aggregate fees billed since inception on May 29, 2018 for products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item are $0 for the period ended December 31, 2018. |
(e)(1) | Disclose the AuditCommittee’s pre-approval policies and procedures described in paragraph (c)(7) ofRule 2-01 ofRegulation S-X: |
The Audit Committee shall:
(a) have direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the Registrant’s independent auditors and, in connection therewith, to review and evaluate matters potentially affecting the independence and capabilities of the auditors; and
(b) reviewand pre-approve (including associated fees) all audit and other services to be provided by the independent auditors to the Registrant andall non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors to the Registrant’s investment adviser or any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser (an “Adviser Affiliate”) that provides ongoing services to the Registrant, if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant; and
(c) establish, to the extent permitted by law and deemed appropriate by the Audit Committee,detailed pre-approval policies and procedures for such services; and
(d) review and consider whether the independent auditors’ provision ofany non-audit services to the Registrant, the Registrant’s investment adviser or an Adviser Affiliatenot pre-approved by the Audit Committee are compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent auditors.
(e)(2) | The percentage of services described in each of paragraphs (b) through (d) of this Item that were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) ofRule 2-01 ofRegulation S-X are as follows: |
(b) 100%
(c) 100%
(d) N/A
2
(f) | The percentage of hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the Registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees was less than fifty percent. |
(g) | Theaggregate non-audit fees billed by the Registrant’s principal accountant for services rendered to the Registrant, and rendered to the Registrant’s investment adviser (not includingany sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and an Adviser Affiliate that provides ongoing services to the Registrant since inception on May 29, 2018 was $0 for the period ended December 31, 2018. |
(h) | The Registrant’s Audit Committee has considered whether the provisionof non-audit services that were rendered to the Registrant’s investment adviser (not includingany sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and an Adviser Affiliate that provides ongoing services to the Registrant that werenot pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) ofRule 2-01 ofRegulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence. |
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
The Registrant has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. It is composed of the following Trustees, each of whom is not an “interested person” as defined in the 1940 Act:
Dr. Bob Froehlich
Timothy K. Hui*
Bryan A. Ward
* | During the period covered by the report, Timothy K. Hui was a member of the Audit Committee. Effective March 1, 2019, Mr. Hui resigned and Ethan Powell was appointed to the Audit Committee. Mr. Powell is not an “interested person” as defined in the 1940 Act. |
Item 6. Investments.
(a) | Schedule of Investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers as of the close of the reporting period is included as part of the Annual Report to Shareholders filed under Item 1 of this form. |
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures forClosed-End Management Investment Companies.
NEXPOINT ADVISORS, L.P.
PROXY VOTING POLICY
Purpose and Scope
The purpose of these voting policies and procedures (the “Policy”) is to set forth the principles and procedures by which HCMLP (the “Company”) votes or gives consents with respect to the securities owned by Clients for which the Company exercises voting authority and discretion.1 For avoidance of doubt, this includes any proxy and any shareholder vote or consent, including a vote or consent for a
1 | In any case where a Client has instructed the Company to vote in a particular manner on the Client’s behalf, those instructions will govern in lieu of parameters set forth in the Policy. |
3
private company or other issuer that does not involve a proxy. These policies and procedures have been designed to help ensure that votes are cast in the best interests of Clients in accordance with the Company’s fiduciary duties andRule 206(4)-6 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”).
This Policy applies to securities held in all Client accounts (including Retail Funds and other pooled investment vehicles) as to which the Company has explicit or implicit voting authority. Implicit voting authority exists where the Company’s voting authority is implied by a general delegation of investment authority without reservation of proxy voting authority to the Client.
If the Company has delegated voting authority to aninvestment sub-adviser with respect to any Retail Fund,such sub-adviser will be responsible for voting all proxies for such Retail Funds in accordance withthe sub-adviser’s proxy voting policies. The Compliance Department, to provide oversight over the proxy votingby sub-advisers and to ensure that votes are executed in the best interests of the Retail Funds, shall (i) review the proxy voting policies and procedures of each RetailFund sub-adviser to confirm that they comply withRule 206(4)-6, both upon engagement ofthe sub-adviser and upon any material change tothe sub-adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures, and (ii) require eachsuch sub-adviser to provide quarterly certifications that all proxies were voted pursuant tothe sub-adviser’s policies and procedures or to describe any inconsistent votes.
General Principles
The Company and its affiliates engage in a broad range of activities, including investment activities for their own accounts and for the accounts of various Clients and providing investment advisory and other services to Clients. In the ordinary course of conducting the Company’s activities, the interests of a Client may conflict with the interests of the Company, other Clients and/or the Company’s affiliates and their clients. Any conflicts of interest relating to the voting of proxies, regardless of whether actual or perceived, will be addressed in accordance with these policies and procedures. The guiding principle by which the Company votes all proxies is to vote in the best interests of each Client by maximizing the economic value of the relevant Client’s holdings, taking into account the relevant Client’s investment horizon, the contractual obligations under the relevant advisory agreements or comparable documents and all other relevant facts and circumstances at the time of the vote. The Company does not permit voting decisions to be influenced in any manner that is contrary to, or dilutive of, this guiding principle.
Voting Procedures
Third-Party Proxy Advisors
The Company may engage a third-party proxy advisor (“Proxy Advisor”) to provide proxy voting recommendations with respect to Client proxies. Proxy Advisor voting recommendation guidelines are generally designed to increase investors’ potential financial gain. When considering whether to retain or continue retaining any particular Proxy Advisor, the Compliance Department will ascertain, among other things, whether the Proxy Advisor has the capacity and competency to adequately analyze proxy issues. In this regard, the Compliance Department will consider, among other things: the adequacy and quality of the Proxy Advisor’s staffing and personnel; the robustness of its policies and procedures regarding its ability to (a) ensure that its proxy voting recommendations are based on current and accurate information and (b) identify and address any conflicts of interest and any other considerations that the Compliance Department determines would be appropriate in considering the nature and quality of the services provided by the Proxy Advisor. To identify and address any conflicts that may arise on the part of the Proxy Advisor, the Compliance Department will ensure that the Proxy Advisor notifies the Compliance Department of any relevant business changes or changes to its policies and procedures regarding conflicts.
4
Third-Party Proxy Voting Services
The Company may utilize a third-party proxy voting service (“Proxy Voting Service”) to monitor holdings in Client accounts for purposes of determining whether there are upcoming shareholder meetings or similar corporate actions and to execute Client proxies on behalf of the Company pursuant to the Company’s instructions, which shall be given in a manner consistent with this Policy. The Compliance Department will oversee each Proxy Voting Service to ensure that proxies have been voted in a manner consistent with the Company’s instructions.
Monitoring
Subject to the procedures regarding Nonstandard Proxy Notices described below, the Compliance Department of the Company shall have responsibility for monitoring Client accounts for proxy notices. Except as detailed below, if proxy notices are received by other employees of the Company, such employees must promptly forward all proxy or other voting materials to the Compliance Department.
Portfolio Manager Review and Instruction
From time to time, the settlement group of the Company may receive nonstandard proxy notices, regarding matters including, but not limited to, proposals regarding corporate actions or amendments (“Nonstandard Proxy Notices”) with respect to securities held by Clients. Upon receipt of a Nonstandard Proxy Notice, a member of the settlement group (the “Settlement Designee”) shall send an email notification containing all relevant information to the Portfolio Manager(s) with responsibility for the security and [ .com]. Generally, the relevant Portfolio Manager(s) shall deliver voting instructions for Nonstandard Proxy Notices by replying to the email notice sent to the Portfolio Manager(s) and [ .com] by the Settlement Designee or by sending voting instructions to [ .com] and [ .com]. Any conflicts for Nonstandard Proxy Notices should also be disclosed to the Compliance Department. In the event a Portfolio Manager orally conveys voting instructions to the Settlement Designee or any other member of the Company’s settlement group, that Settlement Designee or member of the Company’s settlement group shall respond to the original notice email sent to [ .com] detailing the Portfolio Manager(s) voting instructions.
With regard to standard proxy notices, on a weekly basis, the Compliance Department will send a notice of upcoming proxy votes related to securities held by Clients and the corresponding voting recommendations of the Proxy Advisor to the relevant Portfolio Manager(s). Upon receipt of a proxy notice from the Compliance Department, the Portfolio Manager(s) will review and evaluate the upcoming votes and recommendations. The Portfolio Managers may rely on any information and/or research available to him or her and may, in his or her discretion, meet with members of an issuer’s management to discuss matters of importance to the relevant Clients and their economic interests. Should the Portfolio Manager determine that deviating from the Proxy Advisor’s recommendation is in a Client’s best interest, the Portfolio Manager shall communicate his or her voting instructions to the Compliance Department.
In the event that more than one Portfolio Manager is responsible for making a particular voting decision and such Portfolio Managers are unable to arrive at an agreement as to how to vote with respect to a particular proposal, they should consult with the applicable Chief Compliance Officer (the “CCO”) for guidance.
5
Voting
Upon receipt of the relevant Portfolio Managers’ voting instructions, if any, the Compliance Department will communicate the instructions to the Proxy Voting Service to execute the proxy votes.
Non-Votes
It is the general policy of the Company to vote or give consent on all matters presented to security holders in any vote, and these policies and procedures have been designated with that in mind. However, the Company reserves the right to abstain on any particular vote if, in the judgment of the CCO, or the relevant Portfolio Manager, the effect on the relevant Client’s economic interests or the value of the portfolio holding is insignificant in relation to the Client’s portfolio, if the costs associated with voting in any particular instance outweigh the benefits to the relevant Clients or if the circumstances make such an abstention or withholding otherwise advisable and in the best interests of the relevant Clients not to vote. Such determination may apply in respect of all Client holdings of the securities or only certain specified Clients, as the Company deems appropriate under the circumstances. As examples, a Portfolio Manager may determine: (a) not to recall securities on loan if, in his or her judgment, the matters being voted upon are not material events affecting the securities and the negative consequences to Clients of disrupting the securities lending program would outweigh the benefits of voting in the particular instance or (b) not to vote proxies relating to certain foreign securities if, in his or her judgment, the expense and administrative inconvenience outweighs the benefits to Clients of voting the securities.
Conflicts of Interest
The Company’s Compliance Department is responsible for monitoring voting decisions for any conflicts of interest, regardless of whether they are actual or perceived. All voting decisions contrary to the recommendation of a Proxy Advisor require a mandatory conflicts of interest review by the Compliance Department, which will include a consideration of whether the Company or any Portfolio Manager or other person recommending or providing input on how to vote has an interest in the vote that may present a conflict of interest.
In addition, all Company investment professionals are expected to perform their tasks relating to the voting of proxies in accordance with the principles set forth above, according the first priority to the best interest of the relevant Clients. If at any time a Portfolio Manager or any other investment professional becomes aware of a potential or actual conflict of interest regarding any particular voting decision, he or she must contact the Compliance Department promptly and, if in connection with a proxy that has yet to be voted, prior to such vote. If any investment professional is pressured or lobbied, whether from inside or outside the Company, with respect to any particular voting decision, he or she should contact the Compliance Department promptly. The CCO will use his or her best judgment to address any such conflict of interest and ensure that it is resolved in accordance with his or her independent assessment of the best interests of the relevant Clients.
In the event of a conflict, the Company may choose to address such conflict by: (i) voting in accordance with the Proxy Advisor’s recommendation; (ii) the CCO determining how to vote the proxy (if the CCO approves deviation from the Proxy Advisor’s recommendation, then the CCO shall document the rationale for the vote); (iii) “echo voting” or “mirror voting” the proxy in the same proportion as the votes of other proxy holders that are not Clients; or (iv) with respect to Clients other than Retail Funds, notifying the affected Client of the material conflict of interest and seeking a waiver of the conflict or obtaining such Client’s voting instructions. Where the Compliance Department deems appropriate, third parties may be used to help resolve conflicts. In this regard, the CCO or his or her delegate shall have the power to retain fiduciaries, consultants or professionals to assist with voting decisions and/or to delegate voting or consent powers to such fiduciaries, consultants or professionals.
6
Where a conflict of interest arises with respect to a voting decision for a Retail Fund, the Company shall disclose the conflict and the rationale for the vote taken to the Retail Fund’s Board of Directors/Trustees at the next regularly scheduled quarterly meeting. The Compliance Department will maintain a log documenting the basis for the decision and will furnish the log to the Board of Trustees.
Material Conflicts of Interest
The following relationships or circumstances are examples of situations that may give rise to a material conflict of interest for purposes of this Policy. This list is not exclusive or determinative; any potential conflict (including payments of the types described below but less than the specified threshold) should be identified to the Company’s Compliance Department:
| (i) | The issuer is a Client of the Company, or of an affiliate, accounting for more than 5% of the Company’s or affiliate’s annual revenues. |
| (ii) | The issuer is an entity that reasonably could be expected to pay the Company or its affiliates more than $1 million through the end of the Company’s next two full fiscal years. |
| (iii) | The issuer is an entity in which a “Covered Person” (as defined in the Company’s Policies and Procedures Designed to Detect and Prevent Insider Trading and to Comply withRule 17j-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Code of Ethics”)) has a beneficial interest contrary to the position held by the Company on behalf of Clients. |
| (iv) | The issuer is an entity in which an officer or partner of the Company or a relative of any such person is or was an officer, director or employee, or such person or relative otherwise has received more than $150,000 in fees, compensation and other payment from the issuer during the Company’s last three fiscal years; provided, however, that the Compliance Department may deem such a relationship not to be a material conflict of interest if the Company representative serves as an officer or director of the issuer at the direction of the Company for purposes of seeking control over the issuer. |
| (v) | The matter under consideration could reasonably be expected to result in a material financial benefit to the Company or its affiliates through the end of the Company’s next two full fiscal years (for example, a vote to increase an investment advisory fee for a Retail Fund advised by the Company or an affiliate). |
| (vi) | Another Client or prospective Client of the Company, directly or indirectly, conditions future engagement of the Company on voting proxies in respect of any Client’s securities on a particular matter in a particular way. |
| (vii) | The Company holds various classes and types of equity and debt securities of the same issuer contemporaneously in different Client portfolios. |
| (viii) | Any other circumstance where the Company’s duty to serve its Clients’ interests, typically referred to as its “duty of loyalty,” could be compromised. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a conflict of interest described above shall not be considered material for the purposes of this Policy in respect of a specific vote or circumstance if:
The securities in respect of which the Company has the power to vote account for less than 1% of the issuer’s outstanding voting securities, but only if: (i) such securities do not represent one of the 10 largest holdings of such issuer’s outstanding voting securities and (ii) such securities do not represent more than 2% of the Client’s holdings with the Company.
7
The matter to be voted on relates to a restructuring of the terms of existing securities or the issuance of new securities or a similar matter arising out of the holding of securities, other than common equity, in the context of a bankruptcy or threatened bankruptcy of the issuer.
Recordkeeping
Following the submission of a proxy vote, the Fund will maintain a report of the vote and all relevant documentation.
The Fund shall retain records relating to the voting of proxies and the Company shall conduct due diligence, including on Proxy Voting Services and Proxy Advisors, as applicable, to ensure the following records are adequately maintained by the appropriate party:
| (i) | Copies of this Policy and any amendments thereto. |
| (ii) | A current copy of the Proxy Advisor’s voting guidelines, as amended. |
| (iii) | A copy of each proxy statement that the Company receives regarding Client securities. The Company may rely on a third party to make and retain, on the Company’s behalf, a copy of a proxy statement, provided that the Company has obtained an undertaking from the third party to provide a copy of the proxy statement promptly upon request. |
| (iv) | Records of each vote cast by the Company on behalf of Clients. The Company may satisfy this requirement by relying on a third party to make and retain, on the Company’s behalf, a record of the vote cast, provided that the Company has obtained an undertaking from the third party to provide a copy of the record promptly upon request. |
| (v) | A copy of any documents created by the Company that were material to making a decision how to vote or that memorializes the basis for that decision. |
| (vi) | A copy of each written request for information on how the Company voted proxies on behalf of the Client, and a copy of any written response by the Company to any (oral or written) request for information on how the Company voted. |
These records shall be maintained and preserved in an easily accessible place for a period of not less than five years from the end of the Company’s fiscal year during which the last entry was made in the records, the first two years in an appropriate office of the Company.2
Enforcement of this Policy
It shall be the responsibility of the Compliance Department to handle or coordinate the enforcement of this Policy. The Compliance Department will periodically sample proxy voting records to ensure that proxies have been voted in accordance with this Policy, with a particular focus on any proxy votes that require additional analysis (e.g., proxies voted contrary to the recommendations of a Proxy Advisor).
2 | If the Company has essentially immediate access to a book or record (on the Company’s proprietary system or otherwise) through a computer located at an appropriate office of the Company, then that book or record will be considered to be maintained at an appropriate office of the Company. “Immediate access” to books and records includes that the Company has the ability to provide promptly to Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) examination staff hard copies of the books and records or access to the storage medium. The party responsible for the applicable books and records as described above shall also be responsible for ensuring that those books and records for the first two years are either physically maintained in an appropriate office of the Company or that the Company otherwise has essentially immediate access to the required books and records for the first two years. |
8
If the Compliance Department determines that a Proxy Advisor or Proxy Voting Service may have committed a material error, the Compliance Department will investigate the error, taking into account the nature of the error, and seek to determine whether the Proxy Advisor or Proxy Voting Service is taking reasonable steps to reduce similar errors in the future.
In addition, no less frequently than annually, the Compliance Department will review the adequacy of this Policy to ensure that it has been implemented effectively and to confirm that this Policy continues to be reasonably designed to ensure that proxies are voted in the best interest of Clients.
Disclosures to Clients and Investors
The Company includes a description of its policies and procedures regarding proxy voting in Part 2 of Form ADV, along with a statement that Clients can contact the CCO to obtain a copy of these policies and procedures and information about how the Company voted with respect to a Client’s securities. This Policy is, however, subject to change at any time without notice.
As a matter of policy, the Company does not disclose how it expects to vote on upcoming proxies. Additionally, the Company does not disclose the way it voted proxies to unaffiliated third parties without a legitimate need to know such information.
9
Item 8. Portfolio Managers ofClosed-End Management Investment Companies.
(a)(1) | Identification of Portfolio Manager(s) or Management Team Members and Description of Role of Portfolio Manager(s) or Management Team Members |
The Registrant’s portfolio managers, who are primarily responsible forthe day-to-day management of the Registrant’s portfolio, are James Dondero, Andrew Hilgenbrink and Nate Burns.
James Dondero — Mr. Dondero has over 25 years of experience in credit markets. In addition to his role at NexPoint Advisors, L.P. (“NexPoint” or the “Adviser”), Mr. Dondero is theco-founder and President of Highland Capital Management, L.P. and NexPoint Advisors, L.P. Mr. Dondero has over 30 years of experience investing in credit and equity markets and has helped pioneer credit asset classes. Prior to founding Highland Capital Management in 1993, Mr. Dondero served as Chief Investment Officer of Protective Life’s GIC subsidiary and helped grow the business from concept to over $2 billion between 1989 and 1993. His portfolio management experience includes mortgage-backed securities, investment grade corporates, leveraged bank loans, high-yield bonds, emerging market debt, real estate, derivatives, preferred stocks and common stocks. From 1985 to 1989, he managed approximately $1 billion in fixed income funds for American Express. Mr. Dondero received a BS in Commerce (Accounting and Finance) from the University of Virginia, and is a Certified Managerial Accountant. Mr. Dondero has earned the right to use the Chartered Financial Analyst designation. Mr. Dondero currently serves as Chairman of NexBank SSB and serves on the Board of Directors of American Banknote Corporation, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Jernigan Capital, Inc., Cornerstone Healthcare Group, and Texmark Timber Treasury, L.P.
Andrew Hilgenbrink – Dr. Hilgenbrink is a Managing Director at Highland Capital Management Fund Advisors, L.P., an affiliate of the Adviser (“HCMFA”), and a Portfolio Manager with the Adviser. Prior to his current position, he was Director of Investments for Cummings Bay, L.P., an affiliated investment adviser. Prior to joining Cummings Bay, L.P., he spent four years as a healthcare equity analyst at Jefferies & Company. During his tenure at Jefferies, he covered stocks in a variety of healthcare sectors, including specialty pharma, pharmaceutical services, managed care, and healthcare information technology. He has been actively involved in the biotech sector for over seventeen years. This includes pharmaceuticals experience spanning the commercial, research and investment management functions. Dr. Hilgenbrink was also a member of the Board of Directors for Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals prior to its acquisition. Dr. Hilgenbrink holds a Doctorate of Chemistry from Purdue University and a MBA from the Owen Graduate School of Management at Vanderbilt University. He also earned a B.S. in Biochemistry at the University of Missouri.
Nate Burns –Mr. Burns is a Managing Director at Highland and a Portfolio Manager with the Adviser. Prior to joining Highland in 2013, he was an Associate at Ripplewood Holdings, a global private equity firm focused on control-oriented buyout, distressed and special situation investments. Prior to joining Ripplewood, he was an Analyst in the Global Technology Mergers & Acquisitions group at Lehman Brothers. Mr. Burns received a B.S. in Analytical Finance and Economics, summa cum laude, from Wake Forest University and an MBA, with Honors and Distinction, from Columbia Business School. Mr. Burns has also earned the right to use the Chartered Financial Analyst designation
10
(a)(2) | Other Accounts Managed by Portfolio Manager(s) or Management Team Member and Potential Conflicts of Interest |
Other Accounts Managed by Portfolio Manager(s) or Management Team Member
The following table provides information about funds and accounts, other than the Registrant, for which the Registrant’s portfolio managers are primarily responsible forthe day-to-day portfolio management as of December 31, 2018.
11
James Dondero
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Type of Accounts | | Total # of Accounts Managed | | | Total Assets (millions) | | | # of Accounts Managed with Performance- Based Advisory Fee | | | Total Assets with Performance- Based Advisory Fee (millions) | |
Registered Investment Companies: | | | 11 | | | $ | 2,536.73 | | | | 1 | | | $ | 89.86 | |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles: | | | 2 | | | $ | 773.14 | | | | 2 | | | $ | 773.14 | |
Other Accounts: | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Andrew Hilgenbrink
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Type of Accounts | | Total # of Accounts Managed | | | Total Assets (millions) | | | # of Accounts Managed with Performance- Based Advisory Fee | | | Total Assets with Performance- Based Advisory Fee (millions) | |
Registered Investment Companies: | | | 1 | | | $ | 47.88 | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles: | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Other Accounts: | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Nate Burns
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Type of Accounts | | Total # of Accounts Managed | | | Total Assets (millions) | | | # of Accounts Managed with Performance- Based Advisory Fee | | | Total Assets with Performance- Based Advisory Fee (millions) | |
Registered Investment Companies: | | | 1 | | | $ | 47.88 | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles: | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Other Accounts: | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Potential Conflicts of Interests
The Adviser and/or its general partner, limited partners, officers, affiliates and employees provide investment advice to other parties and manage other accounts and private investment vehicles similar to the Registrant. For the purposes of this section, the term “Highland” shall include the Adviser and its affiliated investment advisors, including HCM and its affiliates. In connection with such other investment management activities, the Adviser and/or its general partner, limited partners, officers, affiliates and employees may decide to invest the funds of one or more other accounts or recommend the investment of funds by other parties, rather than the Registrant’s monies, in a particular security or strategy. In addition, the Adviser and such other persons will determine the allocation of funds from the Registrant and such other accounts to investment strategies and techniques on whatever basis they consider appropriate or desirable in their sole and absolute discretion.
Highland has built a professional working environment, a firm-wide compliance culture and compliance procedures and systems designed to protect against potential incentives that may favor one account over another. Highland has adopted policies and procedures that address the allocation of investment opportunities, execution of portfolio transactions, personal trading by employees and other potential conflicts of interest that are designed to ensure that all client accounts are treated equitably over time. Nevertheless, Highland furnishes advisory services to numerous clients in addition to the Registrant, and Highland may, consistent with applicable law, make investment recommendations to other clients or accounts (including accounts that have performance or higher fees paid to Highland or in which portfolio managers have a personal interest in the receipt of such fees) that may be the same as or different from those made to the Registrant. In addition, Highland, its affiliates and any of their partners, directors, officers, stockholders or employees may or may not have an interest in the securities whose purchase and sale the Adviser recommends to the Registrant. Actions with respect to securities of the same kind may be the same as or different from the action that the Adviser, or any of its affiliates, or any of their partners,
12
directors, officers, stockholders or employees or any member of their families may take with respect to the same securities. Moreover, the Adviser may refrain from rendering any advice or services concerning securities of companies of which any of the Adviser’s (or its affiliates’) partners, directors, officers or employees are directors or officers, or companies as to which the Adviser or any of its affiliates or partners, directors, officers and employees of any of them has any substantial economic interest or possessesmaterial non-public information. In addition to its various policies and procedures designed to address these issues, Highland includes disclosure regarding these matters to its clients in both its Form ADV and investment advisory agreements.
The Adviser, its affiliates or their partners, directors, officers or employees similarly serve or may serve other entities that operate in the same or related lines of business, including accounts managed by an investment adviser affiliated with the Adviser. Accordingly, these individuals may have obligations to investors in those entities or funds or to other clients, the fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of the Registrant. As a result, the Adviser will face conflicts in the allocation of investment opportunities to the Registrant and other funds and clients. In order to enable such affiliates to fulfill their fiduciary duties to each of the clients for which they have responsibility, the Adviser will endeavor to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner, pursuant to policies and procedures adopted by the Adviser and its advisory affiliates that are designed to manage potential conflicts of interest, which may, subject to applicable regulatory constraints, involve pro rata co-investment by the funds and such other clients or may involve a rotation of opportunities among the funds and such other clients. The Registrant will only make investments in which the Adviser or an affiliate hold an interest to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act and SEC staff interpretations or pursuant to the terms and conditions of the exemptive order received by the Adviser and certain funds affiliated with the Registrant, dated April 19, 2016. For example, exemptive relief is not required for the Registrant to invest in syndicated deals and secondary loan market transactions in which the Adviser or an affiliate has an interest where price is the only negotiated point. The order applies to all “Investment Companies,” which includesfuture closed-end investment companies registered under the 1940 Act that are managed by the Adviser, which includes the Registrant. The Registrant, therefore, may in the future invest in accordance with the terms and conditions of the exemptive order. To mitigate any actual or perceived conflicts of interest, allocation of limited offering securities (such as IPOs and registered secondary offerings) to principal accounts that do not include third party investors may only be made after all other client account orders for the security have been filled. However, there can be no assurance that such policies and procedures will in every case ensure fair and equitable allocations of investment opportunities, particularly when considered in hindsight.
Conflicts may arise in cases when clients invest in different parts of an issuer’s capital structure, including circumstances in which one or more clients own private securities or obligations of an issuer and other clients may own public securities of the same issuer. In addition, one or more clients may invest in securities, or other financial instruments, of an issuer that are senior or junior to securities, or financial instruments, of the same issuer that are held by or acquired for, one or more other clients. For example, if such issuer encounters financial problems, decisions related to such securities (such as over the terms of any workout or proposed waivers and amendments to debt covenants) may raise conflicts of interests. In such a distressed situation, a client holding debt securities of the issuer may be better served by a liquidation of the issuer in which it may be paid in full, whereas a client holding equity securities of the issuer might prefer a reorganization that holds the potential to create value for the equity holders. In the event of conflicting interests within an issuer‘s capital structure, Highland will generally pursue the strategy that Highland believes best reflects what would be expected to be negotiated in an arm’s length transaction with due consideration being given to Highland’s fiduciary duties to each of its accounts (without regard to the nature of the accounts involved or fees received from such accounts). This strategy may be recommended by one or more Highland investment professionals. A single person may represent more than one part of an issuer’s capital structure. The recommended course of action will be presented to the conflicts committee for final determination as to how to proceed. Highland may elect, but is not required, to assign
13
different teams to make recommendations for different parts of the capital structure as the conflicts committee determines in its discretion. In the event any Highland personnel serve on the board of the subject company, they generally recuse themselves from voting on any board matter with respect to a transaction that has an asymmetrical impact on the capital structure. Highland personnel board members may still make recommendations to the conflicts committee. If any such persons are also on the conflicts committee, they may recuse themselves from the committee’s determination. A portfolio manager with respect to any applicable Highland registered investment company clients (“Retail Accounts”) participates in such discussions, but makes an independent determination as to which course of action he or she determines is in the best interest of the applicable Retail Accounts. Highland may use external counsel for guidance and assistance.
The Adviser and its affiliates have both subjective and objective procedures and policies in place designed to manage potential conflicts of interest involving clients so that, for example, investment opportunities are allocated in a fair and equitable manner among the Registrant and such other clients. An investment opportunity that is suitable for multiple clients of the Adviser and its affiliates may not be capable of being shared among some or all of such clients due to the limited scale of the opportunity or other factors, including regulatory restrictions imposed by the 1940 Act. There can be no assurance that the Adviser’s or its affiliates’ efforts to allocate any particular investment opportunity fairly among all clients for whom such opportunity is appropriate will result in an allocation of all or part of such opportunity to the Registrant. Not all conflicts of interest can be expected to be resolved in favor of the Registrant.
(a)(3) | Compensation Structure of Portfolio Manager(s) or Management Team Members |
NexPoint’s financial arrangements with its portfolio managers, its competitive compensation and its career path emphasis at all levels reflect the value senior management places on key resources. Compensation may include a variety of components and may vary from year to year based on a number of factors, including the relative performance of a portfolio manager’s underlying account, the combined performance of the portfolio managers’ underlying accounts, and the relative performance of the portfolio managers’ underlying accounts measured against other employees. The principal components of compensation include a base salary, a discretionary bonus and various retirement benefits.
Base compensation. Generally, portfolio managers receive base compensation based on their seniority and/or their position with NexPoint, which may include the amount of assets supervised and other management roles within NexPoint. Base compensation is determined by taking into account current industry norms and market data to ensure that NexPoint pays a competitive base compensation.
Discretionary compensation. In addition to base compensation, portfolio managers may receive discretionary compensation, which can be a substantial portion of total compensation. Discretionary compensation can include a discretionary cash bonus paid to recognize specific business contributions and to ensure that the total level of compensation is competitive with the market.
Because each person’s compensation is based on his or her individual performance, NexPoint does not have a typical percentage split among base salary, bonus and other compensation. Senior portfolio managers who perform additional management functions may receive additional compensation in these other capacities. Compensation is structured such that key professionals benefit from remaining with NexPoint.
(a)(4) | Disclosure of Securities Ownership |
14
The following table sets forth the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by the portfolio managers in the Registrant as of December 31, 2018.
| | |
Name of Portfolio Managers | | Dollar Ranges of Equity Securities Beneficially Owned by Portfolio Managers |
James Dondero | | $50,001-$100,000 |
Andrew Hilgenbrink | | $0 - $10,000 |
Nate Burns | | $0 - $10,000 |
(b) Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securitiesby Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
No such purchases were made by or on behalf of the NexPoint Healthcare Opportunities Fund (the “Registrant”) or any “affiliated purchaser” during the period covered by this report.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which the shareholders may recommend nominees to the Registrant’s Board.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) | The Registrant’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule30a-3(c) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR270.30a-3 (c)) are effective, as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of the report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR270.30a-3(b)) and Rules13a-15(b) or15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (17 CFR240.13a-15(b) or240.15d-15(b)). |
(b) | There were no changes in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR270.30a-3(d)) that occurred during the Registrant’s second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activitiesfor Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
(a)
| (1) | Gross income from securities lending activities: $0 |
| (2) | All fees and/or compensation for securities lending activities and related services: $0 |
| (3) | Aggregate fees/compensation: $0 |
| (4) | Net income from securities lending activities: $0 |
15
(b) | The Registrant may lend up to 33 1/3% of the Registrant’s total assets held by State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street”) as custodian to certain qualified brokers, except those securities which the Registrant or the Advisor specifically identifies as not being available. By lending its investment securities, the Registrant attempts to increase its net investment income through the receipt of interest on the loan. Any gain or loss in the market price of the securities loaned that might occur and any interest or dividends declared during the term of the loan would accrue to the account of the Registrant. Risks of delay in recovery of the securities or even loss of rights in the collateral may occur should the borrower of the securities fail financially. Risks may also arise to the extent that the value of the collateral decreases below the value of the securities loaned. Upon entering into a securities lending transaction, the Registrant receives cash or other securities as collateral in an amount equal to or exceeding 100% of the current market value of the loaned securities with respect to securities of the U.S. government or its agencies, 102% of the current market value of the loaned securities with respect to U.S. securities and 105% of the current market value of the loaned securities with respect to foreign securities. Any cash received as collateral is generally invested by State Street, acting in its capacity as securities lending agent (the “Agent”), in the State Street Navigator Securities Lending Government Money MarketPortfolio. Non-cash collateral is not disclosed in the Registrant’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities as it is held by the lending agent on behalf of the Registrant and the Registrant does not have the abilityto re-hypothecate those securities. A portion of the dividends received on the collateral may be rebated to the borrower of the securities and the remainder is split between State Street, as the securities lending agent, and the Registrant. |
Item 13. Exhibits.
(a)(1) | Code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of disclosure required by Item 2 is attached hereto. |
(a)(2) | Certifications pursuant toRule 30a-2(a) under the 1940 Act and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are attached hereto. |
(a)(4)(i) | Certification pursuant to Item 4.01 of Form8-K under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 249.308) is attached hereto. |
(a)(4)(ii) | Letter from former accountant pursuant to Item 304(a) under RegulationS-K is attached hereto. |
(b) | Certifications pursuant toRule 30a-2(b) under the 1940 Act and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are attached hereto. |
16
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
NEXPOINT HEALTHCARE OPPORTUNITIES FUND |
| |
By (Signature and Title): | | /s/ James Dondero |
| | James Dondero |
| | President and Principal Executive Officer |
| |
Date: March 8, 2019 | | |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | |
| |
By (Signature and Title): | | /s/ James Dondero |
| | James Dondero |
| | President and Principal Executive Officer |
|
Date: March 8, 2019 |
| |
By (Signature and Title): | | /s/ Frank Waterhouse |
| | Frank Waterhouse |
| | Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |
| |
Date: March 8, 2019 | | |