September 21, 2018
Page 2
The Company respectfully submits that the disclosure required by Item 1005(d) of Regulation M-A is not required by Schedule TO, which calls for disclosure under Item 1005(a), (b) and (e) of Regulation M-A, or Schedule 13E-3, which calls for disclosure under Item 1005(a) through (c) and (e) of Regulation M-A. The Company therefore has not revised the Offer to Exchange or filed any additional information as an exhibit to Amendment No. 1.
Offer to Exchange
Summary Term Sheet and Questions and Answers, page 1
1. | Disclosure on page 3 indicates that you “may elect to exchange none of the Warrants.” Similar disclosure appears under “The Offer” on page 28. Please revise to clarify that you may elect to purchase none of the Warrants only in the event that you terminate the Offer due to the failure to satisfy a condition to the Offer. |
The Company has revised the Offer to Exchange to clarify that we may elect to purchase none of the Warrants only in the event that we terminate the Offer due to the failure to satisfy a condition to the Offer.
Section 2. Fairness of the Offer, page 10
2. | Please revise to specifically address the fairness of the Offer to unaffiliated Warrant holders. See Item 1014(a) of Regulation M-A. |
The Company has revised “Special Factors—Section 2. Fairness of the Offer” of the Offer to Exchange to address the fairness of the Offer to unaffiliated Warrant holders. The Company notes that the discussion of fairness is equally applicable to affiliated and unaffiliated Warrant holders, as all holders may participate in the Offer at their option, and will receive the same consideration if they validly tender the Warrants that they hold.
3. | In assessing the fairness of a going private transaction, the factors listed in Instruction 2 to Item 1014 of Regulation M-A are generally considered relevant and should be discussed in reasonable detail. See Questions 20-21 of Exchange Act Release No. 34-17719 (April 13, 1981). Please revise to discuss these factors in reasonable detail or explain why the factors were not deemed material or relevant. |
The Company has revised “Special Factors—Section 2. Fairness of the Offer” of the Offer to Exchange to discuss the factors listed in Instruction 2 to Item 1014 of Regulation M-A. Warrants are commonly valued using a modified version of the Black-Scholes model, which takes into account the strike price and current market price of the Warrants and the current market price of the Company’s ordinary shares, among other factors. Therefore, current and historical market prices are material factors in assessing the fairness of the Offer, and were considered by the Board of Directors. The Company respectfully submits that net book value, going concern value and liquidation value are not material indicators of the value of the Warrants, and were not considered by the Board of Directors. In addition, purchase price paid in previous purchases is not applicable, as there have been no such purchases.