Item 1.01. | Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement |
On November 14, 2018, Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (“Ashland”) and INEOS Enterprises Holdings Limited (“Buyer”) entered into a Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”). Pursuant to the Agreement, Ashland has agreed to sell substantially all of the assets (including stock of certain subsidiaries) of the segment of Ashland known as “Ashland Composites” and its butanediol (BDO) manufacturing facility in Marl, Germany (the “Business”) to Buyer for $1,100 million in cash (the “Purchase Price”), plus the assumption of certain liabilities of the Business as specified in the Agreement. The Purchase Price is subject to adjustment for (i) changes in Net Working Capital (as defined in the Agreement) of the Business from a specified target, (ii) changes in Net Indebtedness (as defined in the Agreement) of the Business and (iii) unfunded pension liabilities for certain pension obligations that will be assumed by Buyer.
In the Agreement, Ashland and Buyer have made customary representations and warranties and have agreed to customary covenants relating to the sale. Specifically, (i) before the closing, Ashland will be subject to certain business conduct restrictions with respect to the Business and (ii) for three years following the closing, neither Ashland nor any of its controlled affiliates will directly or indirectly engage in any business activity that competes with the Business, subject to certain exceptions as described in the Agreement.
Ashland and Buyer have agreed to indemnify each other for losses arising from certain breaches of the Agreement and for certain other liabilities.
Ashland and Buyer have agreed to enter into related transaction agreements at the closing, including transition and reverse transition services agreements, certain intellectual property agreements, certain manufacturing services agreements and certain other commercial agreements.
The sale is subject to certain customary closing conditions, including the (i) expiration or termination of any required waiting periods under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, (ii) the approval of the European Commission pursuant to the Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 of 20 January 2004, as amended, on the control of concentrations between undertakings and (iii) certain other antitrust approvals in foreign jurisdictions. Subject to certain exceptions, the Agreement provides that the closing will occur on a date that is the last business day of the month after the satisfaction of the closing conditions. There is no financing condition to the obligations of Buyer to consummate the transaction. The Agreement also contains certain termination rights, including the right of either party to terminate the Agreement if the closing has not occurred on or before September 10, 2019.
The above description of the Agreement and the sale of the Business does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the full text of the Agreement, which is filed as Exhibit 2.1 hereto and incorporated by reference.
The Agreement has been included to provide security holders with information regarding its terms. It is not intended to provide any other factual information about Ashland or Buyer. The Agreement contains representations and warranties that Ashland, on one hand, and Buyer, on the other hand, made to and solely for the benefit of each other as of specific dates. The assertions embodied in those representations and warranties were made solely for purposes of the contract between the parties to the Agreement and may be subject to important qualifications and limitations agreed by the parties in connection with negotiating the terms of the contract or contained in confidential disclosure schedules. These disclosure schedules modify, qualify or create exceptions to the representations and warranties set forth in the Agreement. Some of those representations and warranties (i) may not be accurate or complete as of any specified date and are modified, qualified and created in important part by the underlying disclosure schedules, (ii) may be subject to a contractual standard of materiality different from those generally applicable to security holders or (iii) may have been used for the purpose of allocating risk between the parties to the Agreement rather than