LITIGATION, CLAIMS AND CONTINGENCIES | Asbestos litigation Ashland and Hercules have liabilities from claims alleging personal injury caused by exposure to asbestos. To assist in developing and annually updating independent reserve estimates for future asbestos claims and related costs given various assumptions, Ashland retained Hamilton, Rabinovitz & Associates, Inc. (HR&A). The methodology used by HR&A to project future asbestos costs is based largely on recent experience, including claim-filing and settlement rates, disease mix, enacted legislation, open claims and litigation defense. The claim experience of Ashland and Hercules are separately compared to the results of previously conducted third party epidemiological studies estimating the number of people likely to develop asbestos-related diseases. Those studies were undertaken in connection with national analyses of the population expected to have been exposed to asbestos. Using that information, HR&A estimates a range of the number of future claims that may be filed, as well as the related costs that may be incurred in resolving those claims. Changes in asbestos-related liabilities and receivables are recorded on an after-tax basis within the discontinued operations caption in the Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income. Ashland asbestos-related litigation The claims alleging personal injury caused by exposure to asbestos asserted against Ashland result primarily from indemnification obligations undertaken in 1990 in connection with the sale of Riley Stoker Corporation, a former subsidiary. The amount and timing of settlements and number of open claims can fluctuate from period to period. A summary of Ashland asbestos claims activity, excluding Hercules claims, follows. Three months ended December 31 Years ended September 30 (In thousands) 2017 2016 2017 2016 2015 Open claims - beginning of period 54 57 57 60 65 New claims filed 1 — 2 2 2 Claims settled — — (1 ) — — Claims dismissed (1 ) (1 ) (4 ) (5 ) (7 ) Open claims - end of period 54 56 54 57 60 Ashland asbestos-related liability From the range of estimates, Ashland records the amount it believes to be the best estimate of future payments for litigation defense and claim settlement costs, which generally approximates the mid-point of the estimated range of exposure from model results. Ashland reviews this estimate and related assumptions quarterly and annually updates the results of a non-inflated, non-discounted approximate 50-year model developed with the assistance of HR&A. During the most recent annual update of this estimate completed during the June 2017 quarter, it was determined that the liability for Ashland asbestos-related claims should be increased by $36 million . Total reserves for asbestos claims were $409 million at December 31, 2017 compared to $419 million at September 30, 2017 . A progression of activity in the asbestos reserve is presented in the following table. Three months ended December 31 Years ended September 30 (In millions) 2017 2016 2017 2016 2015 Asbestos reserve - beginning of period $ 419 $ 415 $ 415 $ 409 $ 438 Reserve adjustment — — 36 37 — Amounts paid (10 ) (9 ) (32 ) (31 ) (29 ) Asbestos reserve - end of period (a) $ 409 $ 406 $ 419 $ 415 $ 409 (a) Included $34 million classified in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017 . Ashland asbestos-related receivables Ashland has insurance coverage for certain litigation defense and claim settlement costs incurred in connection with its asbestos claims, and coverage-in-place agreements exist with the insurance companies that provide substantially all of the coverage that will be accessed. For the Ashland asbestos-related obligations, Ashland has estimated the value of probable insurance recoveries associated with its asbestos reserve based on management’s interpretations and estimates surrounding the available or applicable insurance coverage, including an assumption that all solvent insurance carriers remain solvent. Substantially all of the estimated receivables from insurance companies are expected to be due from domestic insurers, all of which are solvent. At December 31, 2017 , Ashland’s receivable for recoveries of litigation defense and claim settlement costs from insurers amounted to $151 million (excluding the Hercules receivable for asbestos claims) compared to $155 million at September 30, 2017 . During the June 2017 quarter, the annual update of the model used for purposes of valuing the asbestos reserve and its impact on valuation of future recoveries from insurers was completed. This model update resulted in a $15 million increase in the receivable for probable insurance recoveries. A progression of activity in the Ashland insurance receivable is presented in the following table. Three months ended December 31 Years ended September 30 (In millions) 2017 2016 2017 2016 2015 Insurance receivable - beginning of period $ 155 $ 151 $ 151 $ 150 $ 402 Receivable adjustment — — 15 16 (3 ) Insurance settlement — — (5 ) (4 ) (227 ) Amounts collected (4 ) (2 ) (6 ) (11 ) (22 ) Insurance receivable - end of period (a) $ 151 $ 149 $ 155 $ 151 $ 150 (a) Included $14 million classified in accounts receivable on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017 . Hercules asbestos-related litigation Hercules has liabilities from claims alleging personal injury caused by exposure to asbestos. Such claims typically arise from alleged exposure to asbestos fibers from resin encapsulated pipe and tank products which were sold by one of Hercules’ former subsidiaries to a limited industrial market. The amount and timing of settlements and number of open claims can fluctuate from period to period. A summary of Hercules’ asbestos claims activity follows. Three months ended December 31 Years ended September 30 (In thousands) 2017 2016 2017 2016 2015 Open claims - beginning of period 12 15 15 20 21 New claims filed — — 1 1 1 Claims dismissed — — (4 ) (6 ) (2 ) Open claims - end of period 12 15 12 15 20 Hercules asbestos-related liability From the range of estimates, Ashland records the amount it believes to be the best estimate of future payments for litigation defense and claim settlement costs, which generally approximates the mid-point of the estimated range of exposure from model results. Ashland reviews this estimate and related assumptions quarterly and annually updates the results of a non-inflated, non-discounted approximate 50-year model developed with the assistance of HR&A. As a result of the most recent annual update of this estimate, completed during the June 2017 quarter, it was determined that the liability for Hercules asbestos-related claims should be increased by $16 million . Total reserves for asbestos claims were $315 million at December 31, 2017 compared to $323 million at September 30, 2017 . A progression of activity in the asbestos reserve is presented in the following table. Three months ended December 31 Years ended September 30 (In millions) 2017 2016 2017 2016 2015 Asbestos reserve - beginning of period $ 323 $ 321 $ 321 $ 311 $ 329 Reserve adjustment — — 16 25 4 Amounts paid (8 ) (3 ) (14 ) (15 ) (22 ) Asbestos reserve - end of period (a) $ 315 $ 318 $ 323 $ 321 $ 311 (a) Included $14 million classified in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017 . Hercules asbestos-related receivables For the Hercules asbestos-related obligations, certain reimbursement obligations pursuant to coverage-in-place agreements with insurance carriers exist. As a result, any increases in the asbestos reserve have been partially offset by probable insurance recoveries. Ashland has estimated the value of probable insurance recoveries associated with its asbestos reserve based on management’s interpretations and estimates surrounding the available or applicable insurance coverage, including an assumption that all solvent insurance carriers remain solvent. The estimated receivable consists exclusively of solvent domestic insurers. As of December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017 , the receivables from insurers amounted to $68 million . During the June 2017 quarter, the annual update of the model used for purposes of valuing the asbestos reserve and its impact on valuation of future recoveries from insurers was completed. This model update resulted in a $5 million increase in the receivable for probable insurance recoveries. A progression of activity in the Hercules insurance receivable is presented in the following table. Three months ended December 31 Years ended September 30 (In millions) 2017 2016 2017 2016 2015 Insurance receivable - beginning of period $ 68 $ 63 $ 63 $ 56 $ 77 Receivable adjustment — — 5 7 1 Insurance settlement — — — — (22 ) Insurance receivable - end of period $ 68 $ 63 $ 68 $ 63 $ 56 Asbestos litigation cost projection Projecting future asbestos costs is subject to numerous variables that are extremely difficult to predict. In addition to the significant uncertainties surrounding the number of claims that might be received, other variables include the type and severity of the disease alleged by each claimant, the long latency period associated with asbestos exposure, mortality rates, dismissal rates, costs of medical treatment, the impact of bankruptcies of other companies that are co-defendants in claims, uncertainties surrounding the litigation process from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and from case to case, and the impact of potential changes in legislative or judicial standards. Furthermore, any predictions with respect to these variables are subject to even greater uncertainty as the projection period lengthens. In light of these inherent uncertainties, Ashland believes that the asbestos reserves for Ashland and Hercules represent the best estimate within a range of possible outcomes. As a part of the process to develop these estimates of future asbestos costs, a range of long-term cost models was developed. These models are based on national studies that predict the number of people likely to develop asbestos-related diseases and are heavily influenced by assumptions regarding long-term inflation rates for indemnity payments and legal defense costs, as well as other variables mentioned previously. Ashland has currently estimated in various models ranging from approximately 40 to 50 year periods that it is reasonably possible that total future litigation defense and claim settlement costs on an inflated and undiscounted basis could range as high as approximately $660 million for the Ashland asbestos-related litigation (current reserve of $409 million ) and approximately $510 million for the Hercules asbestos-related litigation (current reserve of $315 million ), depending on the combination of assumptions selected in the various models. If actual experience is worse than projected, relative to the number of claims filed, the severity of alleged disease associated with those claims or costs incurred to resolve those claims, or actuarial refinement or improvements to the assumptions used within these models are initiated, Ashland may need to further increase the estimates of the costs associated with asbestos claims and these increases could be material over time. Environmental remediation and asset retirement obligations Ashland is subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations that require environmental assessment or remediation efforts (collectively environmental remediation) at multiple locations. At December 31, 2017 , such locations included 82 waste treatment or disposal sites where Ashland has been identified as a potentially responsible party under Superfund or similar state laws, 118 current and former operating facilities (including certain operating facilities conveyed as part of the MAP Transaction) and about 1,225 service station properties, of which 36 are being actively remediated. Ashland’s reserves for environmental remediation and related environmental litigation amounted to $168 million at December 31, 2017 compared to $163 million at September 30, 2017 , of which $125 million at December 31, 2017 and $121 million at September 30, 2017 were classified in other noncurrent liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The remaining reserves were classified in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the environmental remediation reserves during the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 . Three months ended December 31 (In millions) 2017 2016 Reserve - beginning of period $ 163 $ 177 Disbursements (8 ) (7 ) Revised obligation estimates and accretion 13 4 Reserve - end of period $ 168 $ 174 The total reserves for environmental remediation reflect Ashland’s estimates of the most likely costs that will be incurred over an extended period to remediate identified conditions for which the costs are reasonably estimable, without regard to any third-party recoveries. Engineering studies, probability techniques, historical experience and other factors are used to identify and evaluate remediation alternatives and their related costs in determining the estimated reserves for environmental remediation. Ashland continues to discount certain environmental sites and regularly adjusts its reserves as environmental remediation continues. Ashland has estimated the value of its probable insurance recoveries associated with its environmental reserve based on management’s interpretations and estimates surrounding the available or applicable insurance coverage. At December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017 , Ashland’s recorded receivable for these probable insurance recoveries was $14 million and $15 million , respectively, of which $13 million and $14 million at December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017 , respectively, were classified in other noncurrent assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Components of environmental remediation expense included within the selling, general and administrative expense caption of the Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income are presented in the following table for the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 . Three months ended December 31 (In millions) 2017 2016 Environmental expense $ 12 $ 4 Accretion 1 — Legal expense 1 2 Total expense 14 6 Insurance receivable (a) — — Total expense, net of receivable activity $ 14 $ 6 (a) Activity of $0 denotes value less than $1 million. Environmental remediation reserves are subject to numerous inherent uncertainties that affect Ashland’s ability to estimate its share of the costs. Such uncertainties involve the nature and extent of contamination at each site, the extent of required cleanup efforts under existing environmental regulations, widely varying costs of alternate cleanup methods, changes in environmental regulations, the potential effect of continuing improvements in remediation technology, and the number and financial strength of other potentially responsible parties at multiparty sites. Although it is not possible to predict with certainty the ultimate costs of environmental remediation, Ashland currently estimates that the upper end of the reasonably possible range of future costs for identified sites could be as high as approximately $412 million . The largest reserve for any site is approximately 15% of the remediation reserve. Other legal proceedings and claims In addition to the matters described above, there are other various claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings pending or threatened against Ashland and its current and former subsidiaries. Such actions are with respect to commercial matters, product liability, toxic tort liability, and other environmental matters, which seek remedies or damages, some of which are for substantial amounts. While Ashland cannot predict with certainty the outcome of such actions, it believes that adequate reserves have been recorded and losses already recognized with respect to such actions were immaterial as of December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017 . There is a reasonable possibility that a loss exceeding amounts already recognized may be incurred related to these actions; however, Ashland believes that such potential losses were immaterial as of December 31, 2017 . |