Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies See the summary Company’s significant accounting policies set forth in the notes to its consolidated included in the 2017 Annual Report. Use of Estimates The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates, judgments and assumptions are based on historical data and experience available at the date of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, as well as various other factors management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates, primarily those related to: (i) revenue recognition criteria, (ii) accounts receivable and allowances for doubtful accounts, (iii) the useful lives of fixed assets, (iv) estimates of tax liabilities and (v) equity method investments. Foreign Currency Translation and Foreign Currency Transactions The Company translates the assets and liabilities of its non-U.S. dollar functional currency subsidiaries into U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect at the end of each period. Expenses for these subsidiaries are translated using rates that approximate those in effect during the period. Gains and losses from these translations are recognized in foreign currency translation included in other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity. The Company’s subsidiaries that use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency remeasure monetary assets and liabilities at exchange rates in effect at the end of each period, and inventories, property and nonmonetary assets and liabilities at historical rates. Income from these remeasurements were $22,000 Concentration of Customers In certain periods, a small number of customers has accounted for a significant portion of the Company’s revenue. In the first quarter of 2018, after aggregating customers that are under common control or are affiliates, one customer contributed 13% of our revenue aggregating customers that are under common control or are affiliates, four customers contributed 15%, 14%, 11% and 10% of our total revenue, respectively, of which the first two customers represent one customer for concentration disclosure purposes as they are managed by the same foreign governmental body. Revenue Recognition Effective January 1, 2018, the Company began recognizing revenue in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers Performance Obligations Genetic Testing Services Clinical – Institutional Our clinical institutional contracts included within genetic testing services typically have a single performance obligation to deliver genetic testing services to the ordering facility or patient. Some arrangements involve the delivery of genetic testing services to research institutions, which we refer to as “sequencing as a service.” In arrangements with hospitals, medical or research institutions, the transaction price is stated within the contract and is therefore fixed consideration. For most of our clinical volume, we identified the hospital, medical, or research institution as the customer in Step 1 of the model and have determined a contract exists with the institution in Step 1. As these contracts typically have a single performance obligation, no allocation of the transaction price is required in Step 4 of the model. Control over genetic testing services is transferred to our ordering institutions at a point in time. Specifically, we determined the customer obtains control of the promised service upon our delivery of test results. Clinical – Insurance Our clinical insurance contracts included within genetic testing services typically have a single performance obligation to deliver genetic testing services to the ordering facility or patient. For most of our clinical insurance volume, we identified the patient as the customer in Step 1 of the model and have determined a contract exists with the patient in Step 1. In arrangements with insurance patients, the transaction price is stated within the contract, however, we accept payments from third-party payors that are less than the contractually stated price Certain incremental costs pertaining to both clinical insurance and institutional, such as commissions, are incurred in obtaining clinical contracts. Historically contract costs have not been significant to the financial statements. We have elected to utilize the practical expedient to expense incremental costs of obtaining a contract that meet the capitalization criteria, as the amortization period of any contract acquisition asset would be one year or less due to the short-term nature of the customer life. Significant Judgments and Contract Estimates Genetic Testing Services Accounting for clinical insurance contracts includes estimation of the transaction price, defined as the amount we expect to be entitled to receive in exchange for providing the services under the contract. Due to our out-of-network status with the majority of payors, estimation of the transaction price represents variable consideration. In order to estimate variable consideration, we utilize a portfolio approach in which payors with similar reimbursement experience are grouped into portfolios. Our estimates of variable consideration are based primarily on historical reimbursement data. Certain assumptions will also be adjusted based on known and anticipated factors not reflected in the historical reimbursement data. We monitor these accrual estimates at each reporting period based on actual cash collections in order to assess whether a revision to the estimate is required. Both the initial accrual estimate and any subsequent revision to the estimate contain uncertainty and require the use of judgment in the estimation of the transaction price and application of the constraint for variable consideration. If actual results in the future vary from the Company’s estimates, the Company will adjust these estimates, which would affect revenue and earnings in the period such variances become known. Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted ASU 2014-09 The Company adopted ASU 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and all related amendments (collectively codified as ASC 606) on January 1, 2018 utilizing the modified retrospective method, meaning the cumulative effect of applying the standard to all contracts completed as of the date of initial application was recognized to opening retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. Comparative information from prior periods has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods. Financial Statement Impact of Adoption ASC 606 The cumulative effect of changes made to the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 1, 2018 for the adoption of ASC 606 were as follows (in thousands): Balance at December 31, 2017 Adjustments Due to ASC 606 Balance at January 1, 2018 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet data Assets: Accounts receivable $ 4,005 $ 327 $ 4,332 Deferred tax asset / (liability) $ 126 $ (74 ) $ 52 Equity: Accumulated deficit $ (57,664 ) $ 253 $ (57,411 ) In accordance with ASC 606 requirements under the modified retrospective method of adoption, the disclosure of the impacts to condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were as follows (in thousands): As reported Adjustments Due to ASC 606 Balances without the adoption of Topic 606 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet data Assets: Accounts receivable $ 4,969 $ (150 ) $ 4,819 Deferred tax asset $ 505 $ 74 $ 579 Equity: Accumulated deficit $ (59,321 ) $ (76 ) $ (59,397 ) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations data Revenue: Revenue $ 4,653 $ 177 * $ 4,830 _______________________________ * Q1 2018 revenue under ASC 605 would have been greater than under ASC 606 because the amount of cash receipts in Q1 2018 from current and prior period insurance billings was greater than the estimated collections for services delivered and billed in Q1 2018. There was no impact on the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2018. Disaggregation of Revenue The Company classifies its customers by payor type, including them in either Clinical Institutional or Clinical Insurance, as we believe this best depicts how the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of our revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors. The following table summarizes revenue from contracts with customers by payor type for the three months ended March 31, 2018. Three months ended March 31, 2018 Genetic Testing Services by payor Institutional $ 4,580 Insurance 73 Total Revenue $ 4,653 There was no material variable consideration recognized in the current period that relates to performance obligations that were completed in the prior period. Transaction Price Allocated to Future Performance Obligations ASC 606 requires that the Company disclose the aggregate amount of transaction price that is allocated to performance obligations that have not yet been satisfied as March 31, 2018. ASC 606 provides certain practical expedients that limit the requirement to disclose the aggregate amount of transaction price allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations. The Company applied the practical expedient to not disclose the amount of transaction price allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations when the performance obligation is part of a contract that has an original expected duration of one year or less. The Company does not have material future obligations associated with Genetic Testing Services that extend beyond one year. ASU No. 2016-01 In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments, including a provision that requires equity investments (except for investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting) to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in current earnings. The ASU is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2018, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. ASU No. 2016-15 In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230). The standard clarifies the way certain cash receipts and cash payments are classified with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. The standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for all periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. Recent Accounting Pronouncements We evaluate all Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) for consideration of their applicability. ASUs not included in our disclosures were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are not expected to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. ASU No. 2016-02 In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The update is aimed at making leasing activities more transparent and comparable and requires substantially all leases be recognized by lessees on their balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and corresponding lease liability, including leases currently accounted for as operating leases. This guidance will become effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning with the year ending December 31, 2019. The standard requires the use of a modified retrospective transition approach for existing leases. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is still performing its assessment of ASU 2016-02, however expects that substantially all of its operating lease commitments will be subject to the new guidance. ASU No. 2016-13 In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. ASU No. 2016-13 replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology in current U.S. GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses. The update is intended to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The standard will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has not yet evaluated the effect this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. ASU No. 2017-08 In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08, Receivables–Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20). Under the ASU, entities must amortize to the earliest call date the premium on certain purchased callable debt securities. The ASU does not require any accounting change for debt securities held at a discount. The guidance calls for a modified retrospective transition approach under which a cumulative-effect adjustment will be made to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted. The ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for all entities, including in an interim period. The Company has not yet evaluated the effect this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. ASU No. 2018-02 In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement–Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted by the U.S. federal government on December 22, 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act”). Consequently, the amendments eliminate the stranded tax effects resulting from the 2017 Tax Act and will improve the usefulness of information reported to financial statement users. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, (1) for public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued and (2) for all other entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been made available for issuance. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. |