2. The disclosure under the heading “The Merger—Background of the Merger” is hereby amended and supplemented by replacing the last paragraph on page 20 of the Definitive Information Statement in its entirety with the following:
On January 5, 2021, the Board held a meeting via teleconference, attended by members of Company management and representatives of Gibson Dunn and representatives of Citi, to, among other things, discuss management’s updated five-year projections for the Company’s forecasted performance, and to receive a process update regarding the interest by third parties to acquire the Company and the indications of interest recently submitted by Party A and Party B and the Parent proposal. The Board reviewed management’s updated five-year projections for the Company’s forecasted performance, which reflected the feedback previously provided by the Board. Company management reviewed with the Board the key changes to the assumptions used in the projections as compared to the Initial Projections, including with respect to appropriate margins and sales volumes. The Board, along with management and the Company’s advisors, discussed and considered pricing, volume and other sensitivities, including the impact of potential macroeconomic trends, that could impact the assumptions used in the projections and overall fair value of the Company. Representatives of Citi then provided an update regarding the status of discussions with the various parties that had expressed interest in acquiring the Company, and the Board and its advisors discussed the indications of interest recently submitted by Party A and Party B. Representatives of Citi also provided an update regarding the status of Parent’s due diligence process.
3. The disclosure under the heading “The Merger—Background of the Merger” is hereby amended and supplemented by replacing the last paragraph on page 21 of the Definitive Information Statement in its entirety with the following:
On January 18, 2021, the Board held a meeting via teleconference, attended by members of Company management and representatives of Gibson Dunn and representatives of Citi. Upon the Board’s request, representatives of Citi provided an update regarding the status of discussions with the various parties that had expressed interest in acquiring the Company and reminded the Board of the terms of the indications of interest that had been previously provided by each of Parent, Party A and Party B. Gibson Dunn summarized the typical transaction structures for the acquisition of a public company and discussed the necessary steps of each. Gibson Dunn also discussed the Board’s fiduciary duties in connection with certain potential transaction structures that were possible given the Principal Stockholder’s majority ownership of the Company. Representatives of Gibson Dunn also discussed with the Board its fiduciary duties in connection with potential conflicts of interest arising in connection with a transaction, including any potential conflicts resulting from past employment relationships between any of the bidders and any members of the Board or Company management, any current or former engagements of the Company’s advisors, including Gibson Dunn and Citi, by any of the bidders or the Principal Stockholder and, with respect to the Principal Stockholder, the tax receivable agreement (the “Tax Receivable Agreement”) between the Company and LSF9 Stardust Holdings, L.P., which is an affiliate of the Principal Stockholder. After further discussion with representatives of Gibson Dunn, the Board concluded that none of these issues gave rise to a material conflict of interest with respect to any director, advisor, or stockholder. The Board further determined that the Tax Receivable Agreement did not give rise to a material conflict of interest because, among other reasons, the amounts payable under the Tax Receivable Agreement were immaterial relative to the context of a sale of the Company and such payments, per the terms of the Tax Receivable Agreement, would not accelerate in connection with a sale of the Company and therefore would be immaterial to the Principal Stockholder’s consideration of the timing or execution of a potential sale of the Company. After further discussion of the Board’s fiduciary duties, the Board determined that, due to the absence of any such conflicts of interest and the other circumstances known to the Board, the establishment of a special committee of the Board for the purpose of evaluating, negotiating or recommending a potential acquisition of the Company by the parties that had expressed interest in acquiring the Company was unnecessary and would not be beneficial to the Company and its stockholders.
4. The disclosure under the heading “The Merger—Background of the Merger” is hereby amended and supplemented by adding the following sentence to the end of the fourth paragraph on page 22 of the Definitive Information Statement:
Parent’s revised indication of interest did not state that Parent would offer the Company’s senior management the ability purchase or participate in the equity of Parent or its affiliates or any other terms of employment in connection with the transaction.
5. The disclosure under the heading “The Merger—Opinion of Financial Advisor to the Company—Comparable Companies Analysis” is hereby amended and supplemented by replacing the last sentence of the last paragraph on page 33 of the Definitive Information Statement in its entirety with the following:
The calendar year 2021 estimated adjusted EBITDA of the Company of $306 million (after subtracting the Company’s stock based compensation of $9.0 million (“SBC”), as provided by management of the Company), and other business and financial information of the Company as well as certain financial forecasts and other information and data relating to the Company were provided to or discussed with Citi by the management of the Company.
6. The disclosure under the heading “The Merger—Opinion of Financial Advisor to the Company—Comparable Companies Analysis” is hereby amended and supplemented by replacing the first paragraph on page 34 of the Definitive Information Statement in its entirety with the following:
The analysis indicated an implied firm value reference range for the Company of approximately $2,564 million to $2,870 million, from which, after taking into account the Company’s fully diluted share count comprised of 66.3 million shares of common stock outstanding plus the shares underlying 0.5 million performance-based restricted stock units, 1.0 million time-based restricted stock units and 3.0 million options as provided by the management of the Company and, an assumed net debt and financial leases position of approximately $1,048 million and based on the Company’s December 31, 2020 balance sheet as provided by management of the Company, the following approximate equity value per share of the Company Common Stock reference range was derived, as compared to the Merger Consideration to be received in the Merger.
7. The disclosure under the heading “The Merger—Opinion of Financial Advisor to the Company—Precedent Transactions Analysis” is hereby amended and supplemented by replacing the second paragraph on page 34 of the Definitive Information Statement in its entirety with the following:
Citi performed a precedent transactions analysis, which is an analysis designed to estimate an implied value of a company through an analysis of the EBITDA multiples paid in acquisitions of similar companies and businesses. Citi reviewed, to the extent publicly available, financial information for selected precedent transactions in the building products industry ranging from $315 million to $1,910 million and announced between June 2005 and August 2019, which are collectively referred to as the precedent transactions.
8. The disclosure under the heading “The Merger—Opinion of Financial Advisor to the Company—Precedent Transactions Analysis” is hereby amended and supplemented by replacing the last paragraph on page 34 and the first paragraph of page 35 of the Definitive Information Statement in their entirety with the following:
Citi applied the 8.7x to 9.6x range of firm value / LTM adjusted EBITDA multiples to the Company’s LTM adjusted EBITDA for the calendar year 2020 of $270 million (after subtracting the SBC of $9.5 million, as provided by management of the Company), which was provided to or discussed with Citi by the management of the Company, which indicated an implied firm value reference range for the Company of approximately $2,339 million to $2,595 million, from which, after taking into account the Company’s fully diluted share count comprised of 66.3 million shares of common stock outstanding plus the shares underlying 0.5 million performance-based restricted stock units, 1.0 million time-based restricted stock units and 3.0 million options as provided by the management of the Company and, an assumed net debt and financial leases position of approximately $1,048 million based on the Company’s December 31, 2020 balance sheet as provided by management of the Company, the following approximate implied equity value per share reference range for the Company was derived, as compared to the Merger Consideration to be received in the Merger: