NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"). The Company entered into Agreement and Plan of Merger with AmericaTowne, Inc. whereas the merger was accounted under US GAAP as a business combination under common control with the Company being the acquirer as both entities were owned by the same controlling shareholders. The consolidated financial information have been presented at historical costs and on a retroactive basis of the entities. Before the merger, the Company was the subsidiary of AmericaTowne, Inc. of which the consolidated financial statements are the combined financial statements of AmericaTowne, Inc. and the Company. For better comparison, the financial statements of prior periods presented in this filing (including balance sheet on December 31, 2017 and statements of operations as well as cash flow statements for the year ended, December 31, 2017) are financial statements of AmericaTowne, Inc. On May 2, 2019, the Company reached a determination to restate its previously filed financial statements for the year ended. The restatement decreases net income of $51,683 for the year ended December 31, 2018. The restatement relates to correct error on amortizing stock based compensation and relevant effect on income tax. The following summarizes the effects of restatement: Previously Reported Adjustment Restated Deferred compensation: $ 1,689,009 (65,422 ) $ 1,623,587 Deferred tax assets: $ 640,636 13,739 $ 654,375 Retained earnings $ 1,998,689 51,683 $ 2,050,372 General and administrative expenses $ 1,890,686 65,422 $ 1,959,108 Provision for income taxes: $ (443,366 ) (13,739 ) $ (457,105 ) Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all its majority-owned subsidiaries which require consolidation. Inter-company transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Accounting Method The Company's financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting. The Company has elected a fiscal year ending on December 31. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary in order to make the financial statements not misleading have been included. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Financial Instruments The carrying amount reported in the balance sheet for cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, interest payable and short-term notes payable approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Concentration of Credit Risk Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company maintains deposits in federally insured financial institutions in excess of federally insured limits. However, management believes the Company is not exposed to significant credit risk due to the financial position of the depository institutions in which those deposits are held. Property, Plant, and Equipment Property, plant and equipment are initially recognized recorded at cost. Gains or losses on disposals are reflected as gain or loss in the period of disposal. The cost of improvements that extend the life of plant and equipment are capitalized. These capitalized costs may include structural improvements, equipment and fixtures. All ordinary repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation for financial reporting purposes is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets: Office equipment 3-5 years For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, depreciation expense is $15,682 and $8,484, respectively. Investments Investments primarily include cost method investments. On December 31, 2018 and 2017, the carrying amount of investments was $3,860 and $3,860, respectively. There are no identified events or changes in circumstances that may have a significant adverse effect on fair value of the investment as of December 31, 2018. Income Taxes Income taxes are provided in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ASC 740 Accounting for Income Taxes. A deferred tax asset or liability is recorded for all temporary differences between financial and tax reporting and net operating loss carry forwards. Deferred tax expense (benefit) results from the net change during the year of deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion of all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. The Company was established under the laws of the State of Delaware and is subject to U.S. federal income tax and Delaware state income tax. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in future taxable or deductible amounts and are based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. On December 31, 2018 and 2017, there is deferred tax assets of $654,375 and $169,291, respectively. The Company had $78,323 and $53,309 of income tax liability as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Earnings per Share In February 1997, the FASB issued ASC 260, "Earnings per Share", which specifies the computation, presentation and disclosure requirements for earnings (loss) per share for entities with publicly held common stock. ASC 260 supersedes the provisions of APB No. 15, and requires the presentation of basic earnings (loss) per share and diluted earnings (loss) per share. The Company has adopted the provisions of ASC 260 effective (inception). Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period increased to include the number of additional shares of common stock that would have been outstanding if potentially dilutive securities had been issued. There were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the periods presented. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, diluted earnings per share are the same as basic earnings per share due to the lack of dilutive items in the Company. Segment Information The standard, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information", codified with ASC 280, requires certain financial and supplementary information to be disclosed on an annual and interim basis for each reportable segment of an enterprise. The Company believes that it operates in business segment of marketing and sales in China while the Company's general administration function is performed in the United States. On December 31, 2018, all assets and liabilities are in the United States where the income and expense has been incurred since inception to December 31, 2018. Impact of New Accounting Standards The Company does not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flow. Pushdown Accounting and Goodwill Pursuant to applicable rules (FASB ASC 805-50-S99) the Company used push down accounting to reflect Yilaime Corporation's purchase of 100% of the shares of the Company's common stock. Richard Chiang, the Company's prior sole shareholder entered into an agreement to sell an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock to Yilaime Corporation effective upon the closing date of the Share Purchase Agreement dated June 26, 2014. Richard Chiang executed the agreement and owned no shares of the Company's common stock. This transaction resulted in Yilaime Corporation retaining rights, title and interest to all issued and outstanding shares of common stock in the Company. Revenue Recognition The Company's revenue recognition policies comply with FASB ASC Topic 605. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably assured, and there are no significant subsequent obligations for the Company to assume. Prior to an agreement, the Company assesses whether collectability from the potential customer is reasonably assured. The Company reviews the customer's financial condition, which is an indicator of both its ability to pay, and, in turn, whether or not revenue is realizable. The ability to pay is an important criterion for entrance into an agreement with the customer. If management believes that the potential customer does not have the ability to pay, normally an agreement is not entered into with the customer. If, at the outset an arrangement is entered into and the Company determines that the collectability of the revenue amount from the customer is questionable, management would not recognize revenue until it receives the amount due or conditions change so that collectability is reasonably assured. If collectability is reasonably assured at the outset of an arrangement, but subsequent changes in facts and circumstances indicate collection from the customer is no longer probable, the amount is recorded as bad debt expense. There are two primary customer agreements currently offered to the Company's customers - (a) Licensing, Lease and Use Agreement ("Licensing Agreement"), and (b) Exporter Services Agreement ("Exporter Agreement"). (a) Licensing, Lease and Use Agreement For the License, Lease and Use Agreement, the Company reflects revenue recognition over the course of the term. (b) Exporter Services Agreement. For services provided in the Exporter Service Agreement, the Company has two primary types of services called the Service Fee and Transaction Fee. Additionally, under certain circumstances, the Company may charge an Extension Fee. The customer under the Exporter Services Agreement is defined in this section as the "Exporter." The Service Fee Upon signing the Exporters Agreement, the Exporter is provided with services consisting of eight related components including: 1) market analysis; 2) review of proposed goods and services; 3) expectations for supply and demand in the market; 4) conducting export business in China; 5) information on financing; 6) information on the export tax savings programs; 7) international trade center assistance; and 8) selecting and assigning a tax saving company. All eight components of the Service Fee are delivered as one deliverable upon the signing or shortly thereafter of the Exporter Service Agreement with the exporter. The Company completes the earnings process upon the signing the Exporter Service Agreement since the one service fee deliverable has been delivered and we have no further obligations. Revenue is not recognized until the completion of these eight components and the Company has no further obligations. The Transaction Fee During this process, the Exporter's goods and services are tested in the market, buyers or identified, deals or negotiated and the exporter products and services are delivered, and payment is made. The Transaction Fee is normally a percentage of each transaction. The Transaction Fee process includes the Exporter's participation in three programs: 1) the Sample and Test Market Program; 2) Market Acceptance Program; and 3) Export Delivery Action. In the Sample and Test Market Program, an Exporter's products and services are tested in the market; sources of goods and services are confirmed; price indications are confirmed; and an Exporter and buyer match occurs. In the Market Acceptance Program, the export deal is identified and negotiated. Finally, in the Export Delivery Action, the goods are shipped and delivered and payment is made. The Company does not recognize revenue until completion of these three programs and the Company has no further obligations. Throughout the life of the Exporter Agreement, the Company expects Exporters to complete multiple transactions. Each transaction is a separate and independent process. The Extension Fee The Extension Fee is an independent accounting unit. The Extension Fee is a fee charged to those Exporters who in rare cases for whatever reason fail to avail themselves of the Transaction Process. The Exporter has one-year to participate in the Sample and Test Market Program. Afterwards, provided no transaction has occurred and the Exporter agrees to pay a fee equal to 25% of the original Service fee within thirty (30) days (the "Extension Fee"), the Exporter may continue the Transaction Process. If the Extension Fee is not paid, the Exporter's participation and membership in the Sample and Test Program terminates. In the event of termination, the balance of any prior fees is still due and payable. Provided that the Exporter agrees to pay the Extension Fee and continues with the Transaction Process, at the end of the Transaction Process and the last Transaction Fee deliverable is made, the Transaction Fee Process is completed. Upon completion, the Company has no further obligations, revenue is recognized, and the Exporter is invoiced for both the Extension Fee and the Transaction Fee. After the Exporter pays the Extension Fee, if no transaction has occurred for sixty (60) calendars days, the Company is exempt from any obligation to provide further Transaction Process services and it recognizes revenue of the Extension Fee. The Company recognizes revenue on a gross basis. We have gross presentation for services provided by Yilaime, a contractor to the Company prior to the consummation of an arrangement. In accordance with ASC605-45-45, the gross basis to recognize revenue applies since the Company is the primary obligor in the arrangement. The Company expects to realize revenue for export funding and support, and franchise and license fees for United States support locations, and education initiatives. Additionally, if and when the Company further develops AmericaTowne, revenues would be expected to be recognized for (a) villa sales, rentals, timeshare and leasing; (b) hotel leasing and or operational revenues and sales; (c) theme park and performing art center operations, sales and/or leasing; and (d) senior care facilities, operations and or sales. The Company does not provide unconditional right of return, price protection or any other concessions to its customers. Valuation of Goodwill We assess goodwill for potential impairments at the end of each fiscal year, or during the year if an event or other circumstance indicates that we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of the asset. In evaluating goodwill for impairment, we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we conclude that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, then no further testing of the goodwill assigned to the reporting unit is required. However, if we conclude that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, then we perform a two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment to be recognized, if any. In the first step of the review process, we compare the estimated fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, no further analysis is needed. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we proceed to the second step of the review process to calculate the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill in order to determine whether any impairment is required. We calculate the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill by allocating the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. If the carrying value of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, we recognize an impairment loss for that excess amount. In allocating the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, we use industry and market data, as well as knowledge of the industry and our past experiences. We base our calculation of the estimated fair value of a reporting unit on the income approach. For the income approach, we use internally developed discounted cash flow models that include, among others, the following assumptions: projections of revenues and expenses and related cash flows based on assumed long-term growth rates and demand trends; expected future investments to grow new units; and estimated discount rates. We base these assumptions on our historical data and experience, third-party appraisals, industry projections, micro and macro general economic condition projections, and our expectations. We have had no goodwill impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2018. The estimated fair value of each of our reporting units exceeded its' respective carrying amount by more than 100 percent based on our models and assumptions. |