| Document and Entity Information | 12 Months Ended |
| Dec. 31, 2022 | |
| Cover [Abstract] | |
| Document Type | DEF 14A |
| Amendment Flag | false |
| Entity Registrant Name | ACM Research, Inc. |
| Entity Central Index Key | 0001680062 |
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure - USD ($) | 12 Months Ended | ||
| Dec. 31, 2022 | Dec. 31, 2021 | Dec. 31, 2020 | |
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Pay vs Performance [Table Text Block] | Pay Versus Performance As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid to certain individuals by the Company and certain financial performance of the Company. For further information concerning the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy and how the Company aligns executive compensation with the Company’s performance, refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement. Year Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO(1) Compensation Actually Paid to PEO(2) Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs(3) Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs(4) Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: Net Income (millions)(7) Revenue (millions)(8) Total Stockholder Return(5) Peer Group Total Stockholder Return(6) 2022 $ 404,982 $(20,877,170) $1,114,059 $(1,948,838) 125.4 122.0 $51 $339 2021 398,876 10,772,637 240,810 4,119,010 462.2 151.6 43 260 2020 5,369,089 45,103,619 501,343 3,631,284 440.4 120.3 22 157 (1) This column represents the amount of total compensation reported for Mr. Wang (our Chief Executive Officer and President) for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table (“total compensation”). Please refer to the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement. (2) This column represents the amount of “compensation actually paid” to Mr. Wang, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to Mr. Wang during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to Mr. Wang’s total compensation for each year to determine the “compensation actually paid”: Year Reported Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO(a) Reported Summary Compensation Table Value of PEO Equity Awards(b) Adjusted Value of Equity Awards(c) Compensation Actually Paid to PEO 2022 $ 404,982 — $(21,282,152) $(20,877,170) 2021 398,876 — 10,373,761 10,772,637 2020 5,369,089 (4,963,675) 44,698,205 45,103,619 (a) This column represents the amount of total compensation reported for Mr. Wang for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table. Please refer to the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement. (b) This column represents the grant date fair value of equity awards reported in the “Option Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. Please refer to the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement. (c) This column represents an adjustment to the amounts in the “Option Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year (a “Subject Year”). For a Subject Year, the adjusted amount replaces the “Option Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for Mr. Wang for that Subject Year. The adjusted amount is determined by adding (or subtracting, as applicable) the following for that Subject Year: (i) the year-end fair value of any equity awards granted in the Subject Year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the Subject Year; (ii) the amount of change as of the end of the Subject Year (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in the fair value of any awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the Subject Year; (iii) for awards that are granted and vest in the Subject Year, the fair value as of the vesting date; (iv) for awards granted in prior years that vest in the Subject Year, the amount equal to the change as of the vesting date (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in the fair value; (v) for awards granted in prior years that are determined to fail to meet the applicable vesting conditions during the Subject Year, a deduction for the amount equal to the fair value at the end of the prior fiscal year; and (vi) the dollar value of any dividends or other earnings paid on stock awards in the Subject Year prior to the vesting date that are not otherwise reflected in the fair value of such award or included in any other component of total compensation for the Subject Year. The amounts added or subtracted to determine the adjusted amount for our PEO are as follows: Year Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in the Year Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards at FYE Granted in Prior Years Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Year Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for the Year Adjusted Value of Equity Awards 2022 $ — $(20,822,246) $ — (459,906) $— $— (21,282,152) 2021 — 10,247,543 — 126,218 — — 10,373,761 2020 19,138,662 2,107,887 19,623,384 3,828,272 — — 44,698,205 For stock options, the fair value or change in fair value, as applicable, was determined using a Black-Scholes valuation model. The model references the closing stock price, in addition to the stock option’s strike price, expected life, volatility, expected dividend yield, and risk-free rate as of the measurement date. (3) This column represents the average of the amounts reported for the Company’s named executive officers (NEOs) as a group (excluding Mr. Wang) in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year. Please refer to the Summary Compensation Table in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the applicable year. The names of each of the NEOs (excluding Mr. Wang) included for purposes of calculating the average amounts in each applicable year are as follows: (i) for 2022, 2021, 2020, Mark McKechnie, Jian Wang, Lisa Feng, and Fuping Chen. (4) This column represents the average amount of “compensation actually paid” to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Wang), as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned by or paid to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Wang) during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to average total compensation for the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Wang) for each year to determine the “compensation actually paid”, using the same adjustment methodology described above in Note 2(c): Year Average Reported Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs(a) Average Reported Summary Compensation Table Value of Non-PEO NEO Equity Awards(b) Average Non-PEO NEO Adjusted Value of Equity Awards (c) Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs 2022 $1,114,059 (841,952) (2,220,945) (1,948,838) 2021 240,810 — 3,878,200 4,119,010 2020 501,343 (271,674) 3,401,615 3,631,284 (a) This column represents the average of the amounts reported for the Company’s named executive officers (NEOs) as a group (excluding Mr. Wang) in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year. Please refer to the Summary Compensation Table in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the applicable year. (b) This column represents the average of the total amounts reported for the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Wang) in the “Option Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year. Please refer to the Summary Compensation Table in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the applicable year. (c) This column represents an adjustment to the average of the amounts reported for the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Wang) in the “Option Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year determined using the same methodology described above in Note 2(c). For each year, the adjusted amount replaces the “Option Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for each NEO (excluding Mr. Wang) for that year. The amounts added or subtracted to determine the adjusted average amount for our non-PEO NEOs are as follows: Year Average Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in the Year Average Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards at FYE Granted in Prior Years Average Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted in the Year and Vested in the Year Average Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year Average Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Year Average Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for the Year Adjusted Average Value of Equity Awards 2022 $114,399 $(2,004,595) $46,109 $(376,858) $— $— $(2,220,945) 2021 — 3,642,539 — 235,661 — — 3,878,200 2020 511,921 1,995,921 — 893,773 — — 3,401,615 (5) This column represents cumulative Company total stockholder return (TSR). TSR is calculated by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for each measurement period (2020, 2020-2021 and 2020-2022), assuming dividend reinvestment, and the difference between the Company’s share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by the Company’s share price at the beginning of the measurement period. (6) This column represents cumulative peer group TSR computed in accordance with Note 5. The peer group used for this purpose is the following published industry index: the Russell 1000 index. (7) This column represents the amount of net income reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable year. (8) We determined Revenue to be the most important financial performance measure used to link Company performance to Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and Non-PEO NEOs in 2022. This performance measure may not have been the most important financial performance measure for years 2021 and 2020 and we may determine a different financial performance measure to be the most important financial performance measure in future years. | ||
| Company Selected Measure Name | Revenue | ||
| Named Executive Officers, Footnote [Text Block] | (3) This column represents the average of the amounts reported for the Company’s named executive officers (NEOs) as a group (excluding Mr. Wang) in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year. Please refer to the Summary Compensation Table in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the applicable year. The names of each of the NEOs (excluding Mr. Wang) included for purposes of calculating the average amounts in each applicable year are as follows: (i) for 2022, 2021, 2020, Mark McKechnie, Jian Wang, Lisa Feng, and Fuping Chen. | ||
| Peer Group Issuers, Footnote [Text Block] | (6) This column represents cumulative peer group TSR computed in accordance with Note 5. The peer group used for this purpose is the following published industry index: the Russell 1000 index. | ||
| PEO Total Compensation Amount | $ 404,982 | $ 398,876 | $ 5,369,089 |
| PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount | $ (20,877,170) | 10,772,637 | 45,103,619 |
| Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote [Text Block] | (2) This column represents the amount of “compensation actually paid” to Mr. Wang, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to Mr. Wang during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to Mr. Wang’s total compensation for each year to determine the “compensation actually paid”: Year Reported Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO(a) Reported Summary Compensation Table Value of PEO Equity Awards(b) Adjusted Value of Equity Awards(c) Compensation Actually Paid to PEO 2022 $ 404,982 — $(21,282,152) $(20,877,170) 2021 398,876 — 10,373,761 10,772,637 2020 5,369,089 (4,963,675) 44,698,205 45,103,619 (a) This column represents the amount of total compensation reported for Mr. Wang for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table. Please refer to the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement. (b) This column represents the grant date fair value of equity awards reported in the “Option Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. Please refer to the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement. (c) This column represents an adjustment to the amounts in the “Option Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year (a “Subject Year”). For a Subject Year, the adjusted amount replaces the “Option Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for Mr. Wang for that Subject Year. The adjusted amount is determined by adding (or subtracting, as applicable) the following for that Subject Year: (i) the year-end fair value of any equity awards granted in the Subject Year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the Subject Year; (ii) the amount of change as of the end of the Subject Year (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in the fair value of any awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the Subject Year; (iii) for awards that are granted and vest in the Subject Year, the fair value as of the vesting date; (iv) for awards granted in prior years that vest in the Subject Year, the amount equal to the change as of the vesting date (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in the fair value; (v) for awards granted in prior years that are determined to fail to meet the applicable vesting conditions during the Subject Year, a deduction for the amount equal to the fair value at the end of the prior fiscal year; and (vi) the dollar value of any dividends or other earnings paid on stock awards in the Subject Year prior to the vesting date that are not otherwise reflected in the fair value of such award or included in any other component of total compensation for the Subject Year. The amounts added or subtracted to determine the adjusted amount for our PEO are as follows: Year Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in the Year Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards at FYE Granted in Prior Years Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Year Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for the Year Adjusted Value of Equity Awards 2022 $ — $(20,822,246) $ — (459,906) $— $— (21,282,152) 2021 — 10,247,543 — 126,218 — — 10,373,761 2020 19,138,662 2,107,887 19,623,384 3,828,272 — — 44,698,205 For stock options, the fair value or change in fair value, as applicable, was determined using a Black-Scholes valuation model. The model references the closing stock price, in addition to the stock option’s strike price, expected life, volatility, expected dividend yield, and risk-free rate as of the measurement date. | ||
| Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount | $ 1,114,059 | 240,810 | 501,343 |
| Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount | $ (1,948,838) | 4,119,010 | 3,631,284 |
| Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote [Text Block] | (4) This column represents the average amount of “compensation actually paid” to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Wang), as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned by or paid to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Wang) during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to average total compensation for the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Wang) for each year to determine the “compensation actually paid”, using the same adjustment methodology described above in Note 2(c): Year Average Reported Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs(a) Average Reported Summary Compensation Table Value of Non-PEO NEO Equity Awards(b) Average Non-PEO NEO Adjusted Value of Equity Awards (c) Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs 2022 $1,114,059 (841,952) (2,220,945) (1,948,838) 2021 240,810 — 3,878,200 4,119,010 2020 501,343 (271,674) 3,401,615 3,631,284 (a) This column represents the average of the amounts reported for the Company’s named executive officers (NEOs) as a group (excluding Mr. Wang) in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year. Please refer to the Summary Compensation Table in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the applicable year. (b) This column represents the average of the total amounts reported for the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Wang) in the “Option Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year. Please refer to the Summary Compensation Table in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the applicable year. (c) This column represents an adjustment to the average of the amounts reported for the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Wang) in the “Option Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year determined using the same methodology described above in Note 2(c). For each year, the adjusted amount replaces the “Option Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for each NEO (excluding Mr. Wang) for that year. The amounts added or subtracted to determine the adjusted average amount for our non-PEO NEOs are as follows: Year Average Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in the Year Average Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards at FYE Granted in Prior Years Average Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted in the Year and Vested in the Year Average Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year Average Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Year Average Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for the Year Adjusted Average Value of Equity Awards 2022 $114,399 $(2,004,595) $46,109 $(376,858) $— $— $(2,220,945) 2021 — 3,642,539 — 235,661 — — 3,878,200 2020 511,921 1,995,921 — 893,773 — — 3,401,615 | ||
| Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return [Text Block] | Description of the Information Presented in the Pay versus Performance Table As described in greater detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, the Company’s executive compensation program reflects a pay-for-performance philosophy. While the Company utilizes several performance measures to align executive compensation with Company performance (as described in greater detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement), not all of those Company measures are presented in the Pay versus Performance table. Moreover, the Company generally seeks to incentivize long-term performance, and therefore does not specifically align the Company’s performance measures with compensation that is actually paid (as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K) for a particular year. Compensation actually paid is influenced by numerous factors, including but not limited to the timing of new grant issuances and outstanding grant vesting, share price volatility during the fiscal year, our mix of short-term and long-term metrics, and many other factors. In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the Company is providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in the Pay versus Performance table. Compensation Actually Paid and Cumulative Company TSR The following chart shows the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, and the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our non-PEO NEOs, versus the Company’s cumulative TSR over the three most recently completed fiscal years, in each case as computed in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K: | ||
| Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income [Text Block] | Description of the Information Presented in the Pay versus Performance Table As described in greater detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, the Company’s executive compensation program reflects a pay-for-performance philosophy. While the Company utilizes several performance measures to align executive compensation with Company performance (as described in greater detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement), not all of those Company measures are presented in the Pay versus Performance table. Moreover, the Company generally seeks to incentivize long-term performance, and therefore does not specifically align the Company’s performance measures with compensation that is actually paid (as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K) for a particular year. Compensation actually paid is influenced by numerous factors, including but not limited to the timing of new grant issuances and outstanding grant vesting, share price volatility during the fiscal year, our mix of short-term and long-term metrics, and many other factors. In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the Company is providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in the Pay versus Performance table. Compensation Actually Paid and Company Net Income The following chart shows the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, and the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our non-PEO NEO’s versus the Company’s net income during the three most-recently completed fiscal years, in each case as computed in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K: | ||
| Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure [Text Block] | Description of the Information Presented in the Pay versus Performance Table As described in greater detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, the Company’s executive compensation program reflects a pay-for-performance philosophy. While the Company utilizes several performance measures to align executive compensation with Company performance (as described in greater detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement), not all of those Company measures are presented in the Pay versus Performance table. Moreover, the Company generally seeks to incentivize long-term performance, and therefore does not specifically align the Company’s performance measures with compensation that is actually paid (as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K) for a particular year. Compensation actually paid is influenced by numerous factors, including but not limited to the timing of new grant issuances and outstanding grant vesting, share price volatility during the fiscal year, our mix of short-term and long-term metrics, and many other factors. In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the Company is providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in the Pay versus Performance table. Compensation Actually Paid and Company Revenue The following chart shows the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, and the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our non-PEO NEOs, versus the Company’s revenue during the three most-recently completed fiscal years, in each case as computed in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K: | ||
| Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group [Text Block] | Description of the Information Presented in the Pay versus Performance Table As described in greater detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, the Company’s executive compensation program reflects a pay-for-performance philosophy. While the Company utilizes several performance measures to align executive compensation with Company performance (as described in greater detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement), not all of those Company measures are presented in the Pay versus Performance table. Moreover, the Company generally seeks to incentivize long-term performance, and therefore does not specifically align the Company’s performance measures with compensation that is actually paid (as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K) for a particular year. Compensation actually paid is influenced by numerous factors, including but not limited to the timing of new grant issuances and outstanding grant vesting, share price volatility during the fiscal year, our mix of short-term and long-term metrics, and many other factors. In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the Company is providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in the Pay versus Performance table. Cumulative TSR of the Company and Cumulative TSR of the Peer Group The following chart shows the cumulative TSR of the Company, assuming an initial fixed $100 investment and computed in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, versus the TSR of the Company’s Peer Group (the Russell 1000 index), assuming an initial fixed $100 investment and computed in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. Please see Note 5 and Note 6, above, for additional information related to the computation of Company TSR and peer group TSR, respectively. | ||
| Tabular List [Table Text Block] | Financial Performance Measures As described in greater detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, the Company’s executive compensation program reflects a pay-for-performance philosophy. The metrics that the Company uses for both our long-term and short-term incentive awards are selected based on an objective of incentivizing our NEOs to increase the value of our enterprise for our stockholders. The most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link executive compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to the Company’s performance are as follows: • Consolidated Fiscal Year Revenue | ||
| Total Shareholder Return Amount | $ 125.4 | 462.2 | 440.4 |
| Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount | 122 | 151.6 | 120.3 |
| Net Income (Loss) | $ 51,000,000 | $ 43,000,000 | $ 22,000,000 |
| Company Selected Measure Amount | 339,000,000 | 260,000,000 | 157,000,000 |
| PEO Name | Mr. Wang | Mr. Wang | Mr. Wang |
| Measure [Axis]: 1 | |||
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Measure Name | Consolidated Fiscal Year Revenue | ||
| PEO [Member] | Reported Summary Compensation Table Value of Equity Awards [Member] | |||
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Adjustment to Compensation Amount | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ (4,963,675) |
| PEO [Member] | Adjusted Value of Equity Awards [Member] | |||
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Adjustment to Compensation Amount | (21,282,152) | 10,373,761 | 44,698,205 |
| PEO [Member] | Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in the Year [Member] | |||
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Adjustment to Compensation Amount | 0 | 0 | 19,138,662 |
| PEO [Member] | Year Over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards at FYE Granted in Prior Years [Member] | |||
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Adjustment to Compensation Amount | (20,822,246) | 10,247,543 | 2,107,887 |
| PEO [Member] | Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Year [Member] | |||
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Adjustment to Compensation Amount | 0 | 0 | 19,623,384 |
| PEO [Member] | Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year [Member] | |||
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Adjustment to Compensation Amount | (459,906) | 126,218 | 3,828,272 |
| PEO [Member] | Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Year [Member] | |||
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Adjustment to Compensation Amount | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PEO [Member] | Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for the Year [Member] | |||
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Adjustment to Compensation Amount | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Reported Summary Compensation Table Value of Equity Awards [Member] | |||
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Adjustment to Compensation Amount | (841,952) | 0 | (271,674) |
| Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Adjusted Value of Equity Awards [Member] | |||
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Adjustment to Compensation Amount | (2,220,945) | 3,878,200 | 3,401,615 |
| Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in the Year [Member] | |||
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Adjustment to Compensation Amount | 114,399 | 0 | 511,921 |
| Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Year Over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards at FYE Granted in Prior Years [Member] | |||
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Adjustment to Compensation Amount | (2,004,595) | 3,642,539 | 1,995,921 |
| Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Year [Member] | |||
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Adjustment to Compensation Amount | 46,109 | 0 | 0 |
| Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year [Member] | |||
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Adjustment to Compensation Amount | (376,858) | 235,661 | 893,773 |
| Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Year [Member] | |||
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Adjustment to Compensation Amount | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for the Year [Member] | |||
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table] | |||
| Adjustment to Compensation Amount | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 |
