Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The consolidated accounts include ACM and its subsidiaries, ACM Shanghai, ACM Wuxi and CleanChip. Subsidiaries are those entities in which ACM, directly and indirectly, controls more than one half of the voting power. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation. The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2017, the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 are unaudited. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company reflect all adjustments, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position and results of operations. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, unless otherwise noted. The balance sheet as of September 30, 2017 and the results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period. The condensed consolidated financial statements herein should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016. Unaudited Pro Forma Balance Sheet The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2017 gives effect to the automatic conversion of all of the Company’s outstanding redeemable convertible preferred stock into shares of Class A common stock, which occurred upon completion of an IPO of common stock on November 7, 2017. Use of Estimates The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and the reported revenues and expenses during the reported period in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company’s significant accounting estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to, those used for the valuation and recognition of stock-based compensation arrangements and warrant liability, realization of deferred tax assets, assessment for impairment of long-lived assets, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation for excess and obsolete inventories, lower of cost and market value or net realizable value of inventories, depreciable lives of property and equipment, and useful life of intangible assets. Management of the Company believes that the estimates, judgments and assumptions are reasonable, based on information available at the time they are made. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. Restricted Cash Restricted cash is money that is reserved for a specific purpose and therefore not available for immediate or general business use. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, restricted cash was $433 and $0, respectively. The restricted cash represents a deposit for a letter of credit issued for international purchase. Deferred Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) Costs Direct costs incurred by the Company attributable to its IPO of Class A common stock in the United States were deferred and recorded in other current assets and will be offset against the gross proceeds received from the IPO. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, deferred IPO costs were $819 and $41, respectively. Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Common Share Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share is calculated as follows: Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended 2017 2016 2017 2016 Numerator: Net income (loss) $ (1,282 ) $ 561 $ (4,237 ) $ (468 ) Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling (327 ) 199 (535 ) (277 ) Net income allocated to participating securities — 205 — — Net income (loss) available to common stockholders, basic and diluted $ (955 ) $ 157 $ (3,702 ) $ (191 ) Denominator: Weighted average shares outstanding, basic 5,581,637 2,108,324 5,148,255 2,077,115 Effect of dilutive securities — 1,264,181 — — Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted 5,581,637 3,372,505 5,148,255 2,077,115 Net income (loss) per common share: Basic $ (0.17 ) $ 0.07 $ (0.72 ) $ (0.09 ) Diluted $ (0.17 ) $ 0.05 $ (0.72 ) $ (0.09 ) Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share is presented using the two-class two-class pro-rata, if-converted ACM has been authorized to issue Class A and Class B common stock since redomesticating in Delaware in November 2016. The two classes of common stock are substantially identical in all material respects, except for voting rights. Since ACM did not declare any dividends for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the net income (loss) per common share attributable to each class is the same under the “two-class” Diluted net income (loss) per common share reflects the potential dilution from securities that could share in ACM’s earnings. ACM’s potential dilutive securities consist of convertible preferred stocks, stock options and warrants for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. Certain potential dilutive securities were excluded from the net income (loss) per share calculation because the impact would be anti-dilutive. Fair Value of Financial Instruments Under the authoritative guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) on fair value measurements, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining the fair value, the Company uses various methods including market, income and cost approaches. Based on these approaches, the Company often utilizes certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable inputs. The Company uses valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Based on observability of the inputs used in the valuation techniques, the Company is required to provide the following information according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories: Level 1: Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. Level 2: Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third party pricing services for identical or similar assets or liabilities. Level 3: Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other valuation methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, and not based on market exchange, dealer or broker traded transactions. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain unobservable assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets. All transfers between fair value hierarchy levels are recognized by the Company at the end of each reporting period. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. The inputs or methodology used for valuing financial instruments are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investment in those instruments. Fair Value Measured or Disclosed on a Recurring Basis Short-term borrowings Warrant liability Other financial items for disclosure purpose As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, information about inputs into the fair value measurement of the Company’s liabilities that are measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in periods subsequent to their initial recognition is as follows: Fair Value Measurement at Reporting Date Using Quoted Prices in Significant Significant Total As of September 30: Liabilities: Short-term borrowings $ — $ 3,472 $ — $ 3,472 Warrant liability — — 3,033 3,033 — 3,472 3,033 6,505 As of December 31, 2016: Liabilities: Short-term borrowings $ — $ 4,761 $ — $ 4,761 Fair Value Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate the possibility of impairment. Long-lived assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis when there is an indicator of impairment, and they are recorded at fair value only when impairment is recognized. In determining the fair value, the Company used projections of cash flows directly associated with, and which are expected to arise as a direct result of, the use and eventual disposition of the assets. This approach required significant judgments including the Company’s projected net cash flows, which were derived using the most recent available estimate for the reporting unit containing the assets tested. Several key assumptions included periods of operation, projections of product pricing, production levels, product costs, market supply and demand, and inflation. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted in the Consolidated Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 In April 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting No. 2016-09 No. 2016-09 In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes Income Taxes No. 2015-17 No. 2015-17 In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory No. 2015-11 No. 2015-11 last-in, first-out first-in, first-out last-in, first-out No. 2015-11 No. 2015-11 No. 2015-11 No. 2015-11 In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern 205-40, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern No. 2014-15 Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception ASU No. 2017-11 In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting No. 2017-09 In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, Other Income—Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): 610-20. 810-10. so-called 610-20 No. 2017-05 In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment one-step 2017-04 In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash beginning-of-period end-of-period No. 2016-18 In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments zero-coupon No. 2016-15 In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) Leases Leases No. 2016-02 No. 2016-02 No. 2016-02 In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) No. 2014-09 Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date No. 2015-14 No. 2014-09. not-for-profit No. 2014-09 No. 2014-09 No. 2015-14, 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers No. 2016-08 No. 2016-10 No. 2016-10 No. 2016-12 non-cash No. 2016-20 No. 2016-08, No. 2016-10, No. 2016-12 No. 2016-20 No. 2014-09. No. 2014-09, No. 2016-08, No. 2016-10, No. 2016-12 No. 2016-20 Revenue from Contracts with Customers |