Commitments and Contingencies | Commitments and Contingencies Legal Proceedings From time to time, the Company may be involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types. The Company records a liability in its financial statements for these matters when a loss is known and considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The Company does not recognize gain contingencies until they are realized. Legal costs incurred relating to loss contingencies are expensed as incurred. AbCellera Biologics Litigation In July 2020, AbCellera Biologics Inc. (“AbCellera”) filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging that the Company infringed and continues to infringe, directly and indirectly, the following patents exclusively licensed by AbCellera by making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing the Company’s Beacon and Culture Station instruments and the OptoSelect chips, and sale of the Opto Plasma B Discovery Workflow: U.S. Patent Nos. 10,107,812, 10,274,494, 10,466,241, 10,578,618, 10,697,962, 10,087,408, 10,421,936 and 10,704,018 (“AbCellera I”). In August 2020, AbCellera filed a second complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, making the same allegations with regard to U.S. Patent Nos. 10,718,768, 10,738,270, 10,746,737, and 10,753,933 (“AbCellera II”). In September 2020, AbCellera filed amended complaints in each of AbCellera I and AbCellera II adding The University of British Columbia (“UBC”) as a named plaintiff. Also in September 2020, AbCellera and UBC filed a third complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, making the same allegations with regard to U.S. Patent Nos. 10,775,376, 10,775,377, and 10,775,378 (“AbCellera III”). AbCellera and UBC are seeking, among other things, judgment of infringement, a permanent injunction and damages (including lost profits, a reasonable royalty, reasonable costs and attorney’s fees and treble damages for willful infringement). In addition to procedural motions, the Company has filed an answer and counterclaims in response to each of the AbCellera I, AbCellera II and AbCellera III lawsuits. The Company’s counterclaims in each lawsuit include counts for declaratory judgment of non-infringement of the asserted patents, for declaratory judgment of invalidity of the asserted patents and for declaratory judgment of unenforceability of the asserted patents due to inequitable conduct. The Company filed a motion to transfer the AbCellera I, AbCellera II and AbCellera III lawsuits to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, which was granted and where the lawsuits have been consolidated and are now pending (the “consolidated lawsuit”). On May 6, 2021 and pursuant to Court Order, AbCellera and UBC reduced, without prejudice, the asserted patents in the consolidated lawsuit to the following: US Patent Nos. 10,087,408, 10,421,936, 10,738,270, 10,697,962, 10,753,933, 10,775,376 and 10,775,378. On July 1, 2021, the court granted the Company’s motion to amend its answer and counterclaims to add federal and state unfair competition counterclaims against AbCellera Biologics; on July 22, 2021, the Company filed its amended answer and counterclaims. Also on July 1, 2021 the court issued a Case Management Order that, among other things, requires AbCellera and UBC to reduce the number of asserted patents to no more than two, and the total asserted patent claims to no more than four per patent prior to the trial. Also in July 2021, the Company filed petitions for Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”), challenging the validity of various asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,087,408 and all asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,421,936, then filed a motion in the district court to stay the consolidated lawsuit pending the outcome of the IPR proceedings. In August 2021, the Company filed a third petition for IPR with the USPTO, challenging the validity of all asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,739,270. Also in August 2021, the court granted the Company’s motion to stay the consolidated AbCellera I, AbCellera II, and AbCellera III lawsuits pending the outcome of the IPR proceedings. In January 2022, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the USPTO issued a decision instituting IPR on U.S. Patent No. 10,087,408 and a decision denying IPR on U.S. Patent No. 10,421,936. In February 2022, the PTAB issued a decision denying IPR on U.S. Patent No. 10,739,270. In May 2022, UBC filed a Patent Owner’s Response (“POR”) in the IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,087,408. Also in May 2022, AbCellera and UBC filed a motion in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to lift the stay of the consolidated AbCellera I, AbCellera II, and AbCellera III lawsuits, citing lack of institution of the IPRs of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,421,936 and 10,739,270. The Company has opposed the motion, and a hearing on the motion to lift the stay is scheduled for August 2022. In August 2020, the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against AbCellera and Lineage BioSciences, Inc., an entity previously acquired by AbCellera (“AbCellera IV”). The complaint included two counts of unfair competition and one count of a declaratory judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 10,058,839. The Company was seeking, among other things, damages and a judgment of non-infringement. In October 2020, the Company filed an amended complaint asserting the same three counts and AbCellera and Lineage filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which was granted, without prejudice, in part. In light of the Company’s amended answer and counterclaims in the consolidated lawsuits, which were amended to include its federal and state unfair competition claims as discussed above, in July 2021 the Company filed a notice of dismissal without prejudice in the AbCellera IV lawsuit, resulting in its termination. The Company believes that the patent assertions by AbCellera and UBC are without merit and intends to defend itself vigorously. The Company also intends to proceed with its claims and counterclaims against AbCellera and UBC. Outcomes in litigation can be uncertain and it is possible a court may disagree with the Company’s positions. An adverse determination in these lawsuits could subject the Company to significant liabilities, require it to seek licenses from or pay royalties to AbCellera and/or UBC, or prevent it from manufacturing, selling or using certain of its products, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Securities Class Action In December 2021, Victor J. Ng filed a securities class action complaint (the “Securities Class Action”), which was amended on July 25, 2022. The Securities Class Action is on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired: (a) Berkeley Lights common stock pursuant and/or traceable to certain July 2020 IPO offering documents and/or (b) securities of Berkeley Lights between July 17, 2020 and January 5, 2022, inclusive. The complaint alleges claims under §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder as well as §§11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. It names as defendants the Company, certain of the Company’s current and former senior executives and directors, the underwriter firms that sponsored the Company’s July 2020 IPO, and three firms that invested in the Company. The Company believes that the assertions in the Securities Class Action are without merit and intends to defend itself vigorously. Outcomes in litigation can be uncertain and it is possible a court may disagree with the Company’s positions. An adverse determination in the Securities Class Action could subject the Company to significant liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Derivative Action In March 2022, Trung Nguyen filed a shareholder derivative complaint on behalf of nominal defendant Berkeley Lights, Inc., alleging that certain of the Company’s current and former directors and certain of the Company’s current and former senior executives breached their fiduciary duties to the Company. The complaint also alleged that certain of the Company’s current and former directors and former senior executives used material, non-public information to improperly profit from the sale of Company stock, and that certain of the Company’s current and former senior executives owe the Company contribution for violations of sections 10(b) and 21D of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company is not currently involved in any other claims or legal actions, nor is management aware of any potential claims or legal actions, for which the ultimate disposition could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. No provision has been made for litigation because the Company believes that it is not probable that a liability had been incurred as of June 30, 2022. Product Warranty The Company provides a 13-month assurance-type warranty, generally beginning on the shipment date, on its platforms and chip consumables. The table below represents the activity in the product warranty accrual included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets (in thousands): Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, 2022 2021 2022 2021 Balance, beginning of period $ 914 $ 1,268 $ 1,085 $ 1,271 Adjustments to existing warranties (185) (148) (430) (366) Provision for new warranties 179 242 342 617 Settlement of pre-existing warranties (156) (172) (245) (332) Balance, end of period $ 752 $ 1,190 $ 752 $ 1,190 |