Commitments and contingencies | Commitments and contingencies Licensing agreements In October of 2011, the Company entered into a license agreement, which was subsequently amended in March 2016 (“UC Agreement”), with The Regents of the University of California (“UC Regents”), pursuant to which UC Regents granted the Company an exclusive, sublicensable, worldwide license under certain patent rights owned by UC Regents related certain of the Company’s products. The Company paid UC Regents upfront payments totaling $15,000 in connection with executing the UC Agreement. In addition, the Company issued 250,992 shares of common stock to certain persons associated with UC Regents in July 2013. The Company pays UC Regents a sub-single digit percentage royalty on the Company’s net sales of certain products covered by the licensed patents, subject to an annual minimum royalty payment of $10,000. The UC Agreement will continue until the expiration of the last to expire patent or last to be abandoned patent application that is licensed to the Company, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the UC Agreement. Legal proceedings From time to time, the Company may be involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types. The Company records a liability in its financial statements for these matters when a loss is known and considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The Company does not recognize gain contingencies until they are realized. Legal costs incurred relating to loss contingencies are expensed as incurred. AbCellera Biologics Litigation In July through September 2020, AbCellera Biologics Inc. (“AbCellera”) filed a series of complaints in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging that the Company infringed and continues to infringe, directly and indirectly, the following patents exclusively licensed by AbCellera by making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing the Company’s Beacon and Culture Station instruments and the OptoSelect chips, and sale of the Opto Plasma B Discovery Workflow: U.S. Patent Nos. 10,107,812, 10,274,494, 10,466,241, 10,578,618, 10,697,962, 10,087,408, 10,421,936, 10,704,018, 10,718,768, 10,738,270, 10,746,737, 10,753,933, 10,775,376, 10,775,377, and 10,775,378. The University of British Columbia (“UBC”), the owner of the patents, joined AbCellera as a named plaintiff in the lawsuits. AbCellera and UBC are seeking, among other things, judgment of infringement, a permanent injunction and damages (including lost profits, a reasonable royalty, reasonable costs and attorney’s fees, and treble damages for willful infringement). In addition to procedural motions, the Company has filed an answer and counterclaims in response to each of the lawsuits. The Company’s counterclaims in each lawsuit include counts for declaratory judgment of non-infringement of the asserted patents, for declaratory judgment of invalidity of the asserted patents, for declaratory judgment of unenforceability of the asserted patents due to inequitable conduct, and unfair competition under state and federal law. The Company filed a motion to transfer the lawsuits to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, which was granted and where the lawsuits have been consolidated and are now pending (“Consolidated Lawsuit”). On May 6, 2021 and pursuant to Court Order, AbCellera and UBC reduced, without prejudice, the asserted patents in the consolidated lawsuit to the following: US Patent Nos. 10,087,408, 10,421,936, 10,738,270, 10,697,962, 10,753,933, 10,775,376 and 10,775,378. On July 1, 2021, the court issued a Case Management Order that, among other things, scheduled a jury trial date of December 12, 2022, and requires AbCellera and UBC to reduce the number of asserted patents to no more than two, and the total asserted patent claims to no more than four per patent prior to the trial. In July 2021 and August 2021, the Company filed petitions for inter Partes Review (“IPR”) with United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), challenging the validity of various asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,087,408 and all asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,421,936 and 10,739,270. In August 2021, the court stayed the Consolidated Lawsuit pending the outcome of the IPR proceedings. In January 2022, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the USPTO issued a decision instituting IPR on U.S. Patent No. 10,087,408 and a decision denying IPR on U.S. Patent No. 10,421,936. In February 2022, the PTAB issued a decision denying IPR on U.S. Patent No. 10,739,270. More recently, in January 2023, the PTAB issued a decision upholding the validity of the challenged claims in U.S. Patent No. 10,087,408. The consolidated lawsuits remain stayed at this time. The Company believes that the patent assertions by AbCellera and UBC are without merit and it intends to defend itself vigorously. The Company also intends to proceed with its claims and counterclaims against AbCellera and UBC. Outcomes in litigation can be uncertain and it is possible a court may disagree with the Company’s position. An adverse determination in these lawsuits could subject the Company to significant liabilities, require it to seek licenses from or pay royalties to AbCellera and/or UBC, or prevent it from manufacturing, selling or using certain of the Company’s products, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Securities Class Action In December 2021, Victor J. Ng filed a securities class action complaint (“Securities Class Action”), which was amended on July 25, 2022. The Securities Class Action is on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired: (a) Berkeley Lights common stock pursuant and/or traceable to certain July 2020 IPO offering documents and/or (b) securities of Berkeley Lights between July 17, 2020 and January 5, 2022, inclusive. The complaint alleges claims under §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder as well as §§11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act. It names as defendants the Company, certain of the Company’s current and former senior executives and directors, the underwriter firms that sponsored the Company’s July 2020 IPO, and three firms that invested in the Company. The Company believes that the assertions in the Securities Class Action are without merit and intends to defend itself vigorously. Outcomes in litigation can be uncertain and it is possible a court may disagree with the Company’s positions. An adverse determination in the Securities Class Action could subject the Company to significant liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Derivative Action In March 2022, Trung Nguyen filed a shareholder derivative complaint on behalf of nominal defendant Berkeley Lights, Inc., alleging that certain of the Company’s current and former directors and certain of the Company’s current and former senior executives breached their fiduciary duties to the Company. The complaint also alleged that certain of the Company’s current and former directors and former senior executives used material, non-public information to improperly profit from the sale of Company stock, and that certain of the Company’s current and former senior executives owe the Company contribution for violations of sections 10(b) and 21D of the Exchange Act. No provision has been made for litigation because the Company believes that it is not probable that a liability had been incurred as of December 31, 2022. The Company is not currently involved in any other claims or legal actions, nor is management aware of any potential claims or legal actions, for which the ultimate disposition could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. Purchase commitments The Company has entered into various purchase agreements, including inventory-related agreements with its contract manufacturers. Once these orders are placed, they are generally cancelable by providing notice prior to the expected ship date, however such cancellations could result in the Company incurring certain charges depending on the timing. The Company had non-cancellable purchase obligations to contract manufacturers and other suppliers of $36.7 million at December 31, 2022. Product warranty The table below represents the activity in the product warranty accrual included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets (in thousands): December 31, 2022 2021 2020 Balance, beginning of period $ 1,085 $ 1,271 $ 1,065 Adjustments to existing warranties (571) (707) (490) Provision for new warranties 813 1,217 1,440 Settlement of pre-existing warranties (578) (696) (744) Balance, end of period $ 749 $ 1,085 $ 1,271 |