| Organization and Basis of Presentation | (1)
Newmark Group, Inc., formerly known as Newmark Knight Frank (together with its subsidiaries, “Newmark” or the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, was formed as NRE Delaware, Inc. on November 18, 2016. Newmark changed its name to Newmark Group, Inc. on October 18, 2017. Newmark Holdings, L.P. (“Newmark Holdings”) is a consolidated subsidiary of Newmark for which Newmark is the general partner. Newmark and Newmark Holdings jointly own Newmark Partners, L.P. (“Newmark OpCo”), the operating partnership. Newmark is a leading commercial real estate services firm. Newmark offers commercial real estate tenants, owner-occupiers, investors and developers a wide range of services, including leasing and corporate advisory, investment sales and real estate finance, consulting, origination and servicing of commercial mortgage loans, valuation, project and development management and property and facility management. Newmark was formed through BGC Partners, Inc.’s (“BGC Partners” or “BGC”) purchase of Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc. and certain of its affiliates in 2011. A majority of the voting power of BGC Partners is held by Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. and its affiliates (together, “Cantor”), including Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. which we refer to as “CF&Co.” On September 8, 2017, BGC acquired, from Cantor Commercial Real Estate Company, LP (“CCRE”), 100% of the equity of Berkeley Point Financial LLC (“Berkeley Point Acquisition”). Berkeley Point Financial LLC (“Berkeley Point” or “BPF”) is a leading commercial real estate finance company focused on the origination and sale of multifamily and other commercial real estate loans through government-sponsored and government-funded loan programs, as well as the servicing of commercial real estate loans. At the closing of the Berkeley Point Acquisition, BGC purchased and acquired from CCRE all of the outstanding membership interests of BPF, a wholly owned subsidiary of CCRE, for an acquisition price of $875.0 million, subject to a post-closing upward or downward adjustment to the extent that the net assets, inclusive of certain fair value adjustments, of BPF as of the closing were greater than or less than $508.6 million. BGC paid $3.2 million of the $875.0 million acquisition price with 247,099 limited partnership units of BGC Holdings, L.P. (“BGC Holdings”), which may be exchanged over time for shares of Class A common stock of BGC, with each BGC Holdings unit valued for these purposes at the volume weighted-average price of a share of BGC Class A common stock for the three trading days prior to the closing. The Berkeley Point Acquisition did not include the Special Asset Servicing Group of BPF; however, BPF will continue to hold the Special Asset Servicing Group’s assets until the servicing group is transferred to CCRE at a later date in a separate transaction. Accordingly, CCRE will continue to bear the benefits and burdens of the Special Asset Servicing Group from and after the closing. Concurrently with the Berkeley Point Acquisition, on September 8, 2017 Newmark invested $100.0 million in a newly formed commercial real estate-related financial and investment business, CF Real Estate Finance Holdings, L.P. (“Real Estate LP”), which is controlled and managed by Cantor. Real Estate LP may conduct activities in any real estate related business or asset backed securities-related business or any extensions thereof and ancillary activities thereto. In addition, Real Estate LP may provide short-term loans to related parties from time to time when funds in excess of amounts needed for investment are available. As of September 30, 2018, Newmark’s investment in Real Estate LP is accounted for under the equity method. On December 13, 2017, prior to the closing of Newmark’s initial public offering (“IPO”), BGC, BGC Holdings, BGC Partners, L.P. (“BGC U.S. OpCo”), Newmark, Newmark Holdings, Newmark OpCo and, solely for the provisions listed therein, Cantor and BGC Global Holdings, L.P. (“BGC Global OpCo”) entered into a Separation and Distribution Agreement (the “Separation and Distribution Agreement”). The Separation and Distribution Agreement sets forth the agreements among BGC, Cantor, Newmark and their respective subsidiaries regarding, among other things:
•
the principal corporate transactions pursuant to which BGC, BGC Holdings and BGC U.S. OpCo and their respective subsidiaries (other than the Newmark Group (defined below), the “BGC Group”) transferred to Newmark, Newmark Holdings and Newmark OpCo and their respective subsidiaries (the “Newmark Group”) the assets and liabilities of the BGC Group relating to BGC’s Real Estate Services business, including BGC’s interests in both BPF and Real Estate LP (the “Separation”);
•
the proportional distribution of interests in Newmark Holdings to holders of interests in BGC Holdings;
•
the IPO;
•
the assumption and repayment of indebtedness by the BGC Group and the Newmark Group, as further described below; and
•
the pro rata distribution of the shares of Newmark Class A common stock and the shares of Newmark Class B common stock held by BGC, pursuant to which shares of Newmark Class A common stock held by BGC would be distributed to the holders of shares of BGC Class A common stock and shares of Newmark Class B common stock held by BGC would be distributed to the holders of shares of BGC Class B common stock (which are currently Cantor and another entity controlled by Howard W. Lutnick), which distribution is intended to qualify as generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes; provided that the determination of whether, when and how to proceed with the distribution shall be entirely within the discretion of BGC (the “Newmark Distribution” or “spin-off”). On December 15, 2017, Newmark announced the pricing of the IPO of 20 million shares of Newmark’s Class A common stock at a price to the public of $14.00 per share, which was completed on December 19, 2017. Newmark Class A shares began trading on December 15, 2017 on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “NMRK.” In addition, Newmark granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 3 million shares of Newmark Class A common stock at the IPO price, less underwriting discounts and commissions. On December 26, 2017, the underwriters of the IPO exercised in full their overallotment option to purchase an additional 3 million shares of Newmark Class A common stock from Newmark at the IPO price, less underwriting discounts and commission (the “option”). As a result, Newmark received aggregate net proceeds of approximately $295.4 million from the IPO, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses. Upon the closing of the option, Newmark’s public stockholders owned approximately 16.6% of the shares of Newmark Class A common stock. This is based on 138.6 million shares of Newmark Class A common stock outstanding following the closing of the option. Also upon the closing of the option, Newmark’s public stockholders owned approximately 9.8% of what was then Newmark’s 234.2 million fully diluted shares outstanding. As part of the Separation described above, BGC contributed its interests in both BPF and Real Estate LP to Newmark. On March 7, 2018, BGC Partners and its operating subsidiaries purchased 16.6 million newly issued exchangeable limited partnership units (the “Newmark Units”) of Newmark Holdings L.P. for approximately $242.0 million (the “Investment in Newmark”). These newly-issued Newmark Units are exchangeable, at BGC’s discretion, into either shares of Class A common stock or shares of Class B common stock of Newmark. BGC and its subsidiaries funded the Investment in Newmark using proceeds of its Controlled Equity Offering sales program. See Note 25— Related Party Transactions for additional information. On November 13, 2018, BGC announced that its Board of Directors approved the distribution, or spin-off, to its common stockholders of all the Class A shares and Class B shares of Newmark common stock that it then owns in a manner intended to qualify as generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Newmark is in the process of completing the necessary steps to achieve the spin-off by November 30, 2018 (the “Distribution Date”), and as part of these steps, Newmark has obtained its own credit rating. In addition, in order for the spin-off to be tax free, Newmark must repay or refinance any debt owed to or guaranteed by BGC. As of September 30, 2018, Newmark had $434.0 million of debt owed to or guaranteed by BGC and $382.5 million of borrowings outstanding under the Intercompany Credit Agreement. As of September 30, 2018, Newmark had $260.6 million pledged for the benefit of Fannie Mae in excess of the minimum required balance. On October 4, 2018, Newmark withdrew $252.0 million of the cash pledged for the benefit of Fannie Mae, and repaid BGC $252.0 million of the outstanding borrowings under the Intercompany Credit Agreement. On November 6, 2018, Newmark repaid the remaining $134.0 million outstanding principal amount of the Converted Term Loan and the $112.5 million promissory note under the Intercompany Credit Agreement using proceeds from the sale of its 6.125% Senior Notes. On November 7, 2018, Newmark repaid the then remaining outstanding balance under the Intercompany Credit Agreement. Newmark will repay the $300.0 million outstanding principal amount under the 2019 Promissory Note prior to November 30, 2018, using primarily proceeds from the sale of its 6.125% Senior Notes. Upon repayment of the 2019 Promissory Note, Newmark will have no further debt obligations owed to BGC. See Note 30 - Subsequent Events. On November 22, 2017, BGC and Newmark entered into an amendment to an unsecured senior term loan credit agreement, dated as of September 8, 2017, with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and a syndicate of lenders. The agreement provides for a term loan of up to $575.0 million (the “Term Loan”), and as of the Separation this entire amount remained outstanding under the term loan credit agreement. Pursuant to the term loan amendment and effective as of the Separation, Newmark assumed the obligations of BGC as borrower under the Term Loan. Newmark used the proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and commissions from the IPO to partially repay $304.3 million of the Term Loan. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, Newmark repaid the outstanding balance of $270.7 million on the Term Loan. Also on November 22, 2017, BGC and Newmark entered into an amendment to the unsecured senior revolving credit agreement, dated as of September 8, 2017, with the administrative agent and a syndicate of lenders. The revolving credit agreement provides for revolving loans of up to $400.0 million. As of the Separation, $400.0 million of borrowings were outstanding under the revolving credit facility. Pursuant to the revolver amendment, the then-outstanding borrowings of BGC under the revolving credit facility were converted into a term loan (the “Converted Term Loan”) and, effective upon the Separation, Newmark assumed the obligations of BGC as borrower under the Converted Term Loan. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, Newmark repaid $266.1 million of the Converted Term Loan. As of September 30, 2018, the balance of the Converted Term Loan was $134.0 million. On June 26, 2012, BGC issued an aggregate of $112.5 million principal amount of its 8.125% Senior Notes due 2042 (the “8.125% BGC Senior Notes”). In connection with the issuance of the 8.125% BGC Senior Notes, BGC lent the proceeds of the 8.125% BGC Senior Notes to BGC U.S. OpCo, and BGC U.S. OpCo issued an amended and restated promissory note, effective as of June 26, 2012, with an aggregate principal amount of $112.5 million payable to BGC (the “2042 Promissory Note”). In connection with the Separation, on December 13, 2017 Newmark OpCo assumed all of BGC U.S. OpCo’s rights and obligations under the 2042 Promissory Note. On September 4, 2018, BGC U.S. OpCo loaned to Newmark OpCo $112.5 million pursuant to the Intercompany Credit Agreement, which bears an annual interest rate of 6.5%. Newmark OpCo used the proceeds to repay the 2042 Promissory Note assumed by it in connection with the Separation. In addition, on September 5, 2018, BGC redeemed the outstanding $112.5 million aggregate principal amount of the 8.125% BGC Senior Notes. On November 6, 2018, Newmark repaid the $112.5 million promissory note under the Intercompany Credit Agreement using proceeds from the sale of its 6.125% Senior Notes. See Note 30 - Subsequent Events for additional information. On December 9, 2014, BGC issued an aggregate of $300.0 million principal amount of its 5.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (the “5.375% BGC Senior Notes”). In connection with the issuance of the 5.375% BGC Senior Notes, BGC lent the proceeds of the 5.375% BGC Senior Notes to BGC U.S. OpCo, and BGC U.S. OpCo issued an amended and restated promissory note, effective as of December 9, 2014, with an aggregate principal amount of $300.0 million payable to BGC (the “2019 Promissory Note” and, together with the 2042 Promissory Note, the “BGC Notes”). In connection with the Separation, on December 13, 2017 Newmark OpCo assumed all of BGC U.S. OpCo’s rights and obligations under the 2019 Promissory Note. Newmark will repay the $300.0 million outstanding principal amount under the 2019 Promissory Note prior to November 30, 2018, using primarily proceeds from the sale of its 6.125% Senior Notes. See Note 30 - Subsequent Events. On March 19, 2018, Newmark entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the “Intercompany Credit Agreement”) with BGC, which amended and restated the original intercompany credit agreement between the parties in relation to the Separation, dated as of December 13, 2017. The Intercompany Credit Agreement provides for each party to issue revolving loans to the other party in the lender’s discretion. The interest rate on the Intercompany Credit Agreement can be the higher of BGC’s or Newmark’s short-term borrowings rate in effect at such time plus 100 basis points, or such other interest rate as may be mutually agreed between BGC and Newmark. The interest rate as of September 30, 2018 was 5.41%. As of September 30, 2018, Newmark’s borrowings under the Intercompany Credit Agreement included $270.0 million which bore an interest rate of 5.41% and $112.5 million which bore an interest rate 6.5%. Newmark recorded interest expense of $4.2 million and $7.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively, which is included in “Interest (expense) income, net” in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations. As of November 7, 2018, all borrowings outstanding under the Intercompany Credit Agreement had been repaid. See Note 30 - Subsequent Events. Exchangeable Preferred Partnership Units and Forward Contract On June 18, 2018 and September 26, 2018, Newmark’s principal operating subsidiary, Newmark OpCo, issued approximately $175 million and $150 million of exchangeable preferred limited partnership units (“EPUs”), respectively, in private transactions to The Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”) (the “Newmark OpCo Preferred Investment”). Newmark received $152.9 million and $113.2 million of cash in the second and third quarter, respectively, of 2018 with respect to these transactions. Contemporaneously with the issuance of the EPUs, the newly formed special purpose vehicle entities (the “SPVs”) that are consolidated subsidiaries of Newmark, entered into four variable postpaid forward contracts with RBC (together, the "RBC Forwards"). The SPVs are indirect subsidiaries of Newmark whose sole asset is the Nasdaq share Earn-outs for 2019 through 2022. As the RBC Forwards provide Newmark with the ability to redeem the EPUs for Nasdaq stock, and these instruments are not legally detachable, they represent single financial instruments. The financial instruments’ EPU redemption feature for Nasdaq common stock is not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of Newmark’s EPU equity host instruments, and, therefore, it represents an embedded derivative that is required to be bifurcated and recorded at fair value on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations, with all changes in fair value recorded as a component of ”Other income (losses), net” on Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. See Note 10 — Derivatives for additional information.
(a)
Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”). The Newmark unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared on a stand-alone basis derived from the financial statements and accounting records of BGC. For the periods presented, prior to the IPO, Newmark was an unincorporated reportable segment of BGC. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the historical results of operations, financial position and cash flows of Newmark as it was historically managed and adjusted to conform with U.S. GAAP. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are presented as if Newmark had operated on a stand-alone basis for all periods presented. Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all of the BGC subsidiaries that comprise its real estate segment, all of which are controlled by BGC. This Berkeley Point Acquisition has been determined to be a combination of entities under common control that resulted in a change in the reporting entity. Accordingly, the financial results of Newmark have been retrospectively adjusted to include the financial results of BPF in the current and prior periods as if BPF had always been consolidated. On December 13, 2017, in connection with the Separation, the assets and liabilities of BPF were transferred to Newmark. As of October 15, 2018, ARA, Berkeley Point, NKF Capital Markets, and Newmark Cornish & Carey all operate under the name “Newmark Knight Frank”. Intercompany balances and transactions within Newmark have been eliminated. Transactions between Cantor or BGC and Newmark pursuant to service agreements between Cantor and BGC (see Note 25— Related Party Transactions), represent valid receivables and liabilities of Newmark, which are periodically cash settled, have been included in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as either receivables to or payables from related parties. Additionally, certain other transactions between BGC and Newmark are contributions of BGC’s net investment in Newmark including acquisitions prior to the IPO (see Note 4— Acquisitions). Newmark receives administrative services to support its operations, and in return, Cantor and BGC allocate certain of their expenses to Newmark. Such expenses represent costs related, but not limited to, treasury, legal, accounting, information technology, payroll administration, human resources, incentive compensation plans and other services. These costs, together with an allocation of Cantor and BGC overhead costs, are included as expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. Where it is possible to specifically attribute such expenses to activities of Newmark, these amounts have been expensed directly to Newmark. Allocation of all other such expenses is based on a services agreement between Cantor and BGC which reflects the utilization of service provided or benefits received by Newmark during the periods presented on a consistent basis, such as headcount, square footage, revenue, etc. Management believes the assumptions underlying the stand-alone financial statements, including the assumptions regarding allocated expenses, reasonably reflect the utilization of services provided to or the benefit received by Newmark during the periods presented. However, these shared expenses may not represent the amounts that would have been incurred had Newmark operated independently from Cantor and BGC. Actual costs that would have been incurred if Newmark had been a stand-alone company would depend on multiple factors, including organizational structure and strategic decisions in various areas, including information technology and infrastructure. For an additional discussion of expense allocations, (see Note 25— Related Party Transactions). Prior to the Separation, BGC used a centralized approach to cash management. Accordingly, excess cash and cash equivalents were held by BGC at the corporate level and were not attributed to Newmark for any of the periods presented. Transfers of cash, both to and from BGC’s centralized cash management system, are included in “current portion of payables to related parties” on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet and as part of the change in payments to and borrowings from related parties in the financing section within the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. The income tax provision in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income has been calculated as if Newmark was operating on a stand-alone basis and filed separate tax returns in the jurisdictions in which it operates. Newmark’s operations have historically been included in the BGC U.S. federal and state tax returns or separate non-U.S. jurisdictions tax returns. As Newmark operations in many jurisdictions are unincorporated commercial units of BGC and its subsidiaries, stand-alone tax returns have not been filed for the operations in these jurisdictions. Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all normal and recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets, the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations, the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income, the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows and the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of changes in equity of Newmark for the periods presented.
(b)
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers Further, Newmark previously presented expenses incurred on behalf of customers for certain management services subject to reimbursement on a net basis within expenses. Under the new revenue recognition model, Newmark concluded that it controls the services provided by a third party on behalf of customers and, therefore, acts as a principal under those contracts. As a result, for these service contracts, Newmark will present expenses incurred on behalf of customers along with corresponding reimbursement revenue on a gross basis in Newmark’s condensed consolidated statements of operations, with no impact on net income available to common stockholders. Newmark elected to adopt the new guidance using a modified retrospective approach applied to contracts that were not completed as of January 1, 2018. Accordingly, the new revenue standard is applied prospectively in Newmark’s financial statements from January 1, 2018 onward, and reported financial information for historical comparable periods is not revised and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect during those historical periods. The new revenue recognition guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities that are accounted for under other U.S. GAAP, and as a result did not have an impact on the elements of Newmark’s condensed consolidated statements of operations most closely associated with financial instruments, including revenues from Capital markets commissions, Gains from mortgage banking activities/origination, net, and Servicing fees. There was no significant impact as a result of applying the new revenue standard to Newmark’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, except as it relates to the revenue recognition of certain brokerage revenues from leasing commissions that were based, in part, on future contingent events and the presentation of expenses incurred on behalf of customers for certain management services subject to reimbursement. See Note 3— Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 12— Revenues from Contracts with Customers. In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)—Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)—Restricted Cash In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805) Clarifying the definition of Business In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting
(c)
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases Leases (Topic 842), Targeted Improvements Leases In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes. Based on concerns about the sustainability of LIBOR, in 2017, a committee convened by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York identified a broad Treasury repurchase agreement (repo) financing rate referred to as the SOFR as its preferred alternative reference rate. The guidance in ASU No. 2018-16 adds the OIS rate based on SOFR as a U.S. benchmark interest rate to facilitate the LIBOR to SOFR transition and provide sufficient lead time for entities to prepare for changes to interest rate risk hedging strategies for both risk management and hedge accounting purposes. The amendments in this ASU are required to be adopted concurrently with the guidance in ASU No. 2017-12. In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement — In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) |
