Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Purchaser’s obligation to accept and pay for shares of Common Stock that are tendered in the Offer is subject to customary conditions, including, among others that, (i) prior to the expiration of the Offer, there have been validly tendered and not validly withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the Offer a number of Shares that, upon the consummation of the Offer, together with the Shares then owned directly or indirectly by Parent, Purchaser or any direct or indirect subsidiary of Parent (excluding Shares tendered pursuant to guaranteed delivery procedures that have not yet been “received,” as such term is defined in Section 251(h) of the DGCL, by the depositary for the Offer pursuant to such procedures), would represent at least a majority of the aggregate number of shares of Satsuma’s capital stock outstanding immediately after the consummation of the Offer (the “Minimum Condition”); (ii) the absence of legal restraints prohibiting the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; (iii) the accuracy of Satsuma’s representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement, subject to specified materiality qualifications; (iv) compliance by Satsuma with its covenants in the Merger Agreement in all material respects; (v) the absence of a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, or results of operations of Satsuma and its subsidiaries taken as a whole (subject to customary carveouts); (vi) delivery of a customary officer certificate certifying that the conditions set forth in clauses (iii), (iv) and (v) immediately above have been satisfied; (vii) no valid termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms; and (viii) Company Net Cash (as defined in the Merger Agreement) is not less than the amount required by the Merger Agreement.
The Merger Agreement includes covenants requiring Satsuma and its representatives not to (i) solicit, initiate, induce, encourage or facilitate (including by way of granting a waiver under Section 203 of the DGCL), any inquiries or the making of any proposal or offer that constitutes, or could reasonably be expected to lead to, a Company Acquisition Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement), (ii) participate in any discussions or negotiations or cooperate in any way with any person regarding any proposal or offer the consummation of which would constitute a Company Acquisition Proposal; (iii) provide any information or data concerning Satsuma or any of its subsidiaries to any person in connection with any proposal the consummation of which would constitute a Company Acquisition Proposal or for the purpose of soliciting, initiating, inducing, encouraging or facilitating a Company Acquisition Proposal; (iv) enter into any binding or nonbinding letter of intent, term sheet, memorandum of understanding, merger agreement, acquisition agreement, agreement in principle, option agreement, joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, lease agreement or other similar agreement with respect to a Company Acquisition Proposal or any proposal or offer that could reasonably be expected to lead to a Company Acquisition Proposal; (v) adopt, approve or recommend or make any public statement approving or recommending any inquiry, proposal or offer that constitutes, or could reasonably be expected to lead to, a Company Acquisition Proposal (including by approving any transaction, or approving any person becoming an “interested stockholder,” for purposes of Section 203 of the DGCL); take any action or exempt any person (other than Parent and its subsidiaries) from the restriction on “business combinations” or any similar provision contained in applicable takeover laws or Satsuma’s organizational or other governing documents; or (vi) resolve, publicly propose or agree to do any of the foregoing.
The Merger Agreement contains representations, warranties and covenants by Satsuma and the Merger Reporting Persons that are customary for a transaction of this nature, including among others, the covenant regarding the conduct of Satsuma’s business during the pendency of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, public disclosures and the use of reasonable best efforts to make all filings required by governmental entities following the execution of the Merger Agreement. In addition, certain covenants require each of the parties to use, subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, their reasonable best efforts to consummate the Offer and the Merger.
The Merger Agreement contains customary termination rights for each of Satsuma and Parent, including the right of Satsuma and Parent to terminate the Merger Agreement if Parent has not accepted the Shares tendered in the Offer upon the expiration of the Offer or if a final, non-appealable legal restraint permanently prohibits the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
On April 16, 2023, in connection with the Merger Agreement, Parent entered into Tender and Support Agreements (the “Support Agreements”) with RA Capital Healthcare Fund LP, John Kollins, Tom O’Neil, Elisabeth Sandoval Little, Heath Lukatch, Michael Riebe, Mutya Harsch, Rajeev Shah, Thomas B. King, Tom Soloway (collectively, the “Support Stockholders”), each of which are stockholders of Satsuma and who in the aggregate own approximately 18.82 percent of the shares of Common Stock. As a result of the Support Agreements, the Reporting Persons may be deemed to have acquired beneficial ownership of part of the shares of Common Stock which are subject of this Schedule 13D. None of the Reporting Persons has paid to the Support Stockholders any funds in connection with the execution of the Support Agreements. The Support Agreements were entered into concurrently with the execution and delivery of, and as a condition to the willingness of the Merger Reporting Persons to enter into, the Merger Agreement.