SUPPLEMENT TO DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT
This supplement (this “Supplement”) to the Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on June 27, 2022 (the “Definitive Proxy Statement”), by Switch, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company” or “Switch”), is being filed to supplement the Definitive Proxy Statement as described in the Explanatory Note below.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
As previously disclosed, the Company, Switch, Ltd., a Nevada limited liability company (“Company Ltd.”), Sunshine Merger Sub, Ltd., a Nevada limited liability company and a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Switch (“Company Merger Sub”), Sunshine Parent Merger Sub Inc., a Nevada corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (as defined below), and Sunshine Bidco Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of May 11, 2022 (as it may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time in accordance with its terms, the “Merger Agreement”). The Merger Agreement provides, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, that Parent Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company continuing as the surviving entity in the Merger. The Merger Agreement further provides, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, that promptly following the Merger, on the closing date, Company Merger Sub will merge with and into Company Ltd. (the “LLC Merger”, together with the Merger, the “Mergers”), with Company Ltd. continuing as the surviving entity in the LLC Merger. On June 27, 2022, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) the Definitive Proxy Statement with respect to the special meeting of the Company’s stockholders scheduled to be held on August 4, 2022 (the “Special Meeting”).
As of the filing of this Supplement, seven lawsuits have been filed by purported stockholders of the Company relating to the Mergers: Palkon v. Rob Roy et al., Case No. A-22-853216-B (Nev. Eight Jud. Dist. Ct., May 26, 2022) (the “Palkon Action”), O’Dell v. Switch, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-05246 (S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2022) (the “O’Dell Action”), Bushansky v. Switch, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-05347 (S.D.N.Y June 24, 2022) (the “Bushansky Action”), Brown v. Switch, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-05360 (S.D.N.Y June 24, 2022) (the “Brown Action”), Redfield v. Switch, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-05518 (S.D.N.Y. June 28, 2022) (the “Redfield Action”), Waterman v. Switch, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-05523 (S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2022) (the “Waterman Action”), and Wilhelm v. Switch, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-05785 (S.D.N.Y. July 7, 2022) (the “Wilhelm Action”, and collectively with the Palkon Action, the O’Dell Action, the Bushansky Action, the Brown Action, the Redfield Action and the Waterman Action, the “Actions”). The Palkon Action names as defendants the Company’s board of directors, DigitalBridge, IFM Investors Pty Ltd, and certain affiliates of the Company and alleges, among other things, that the Company’s board of directors breached their fiduciary duties in approving the Mergers, and that DigitalBridge, IFM Investors Pty Ltd, and the certain affiliates of the Company named as defendants aided and abetted such breaches. The O’Dell Action, the Bushansky Action, and the Brown Action name as defendants the Company and its board of directors, and allege, among other things, that the Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A of the Company filed on June 16, 2022 (the “Preliminary Proxy Statement”) omits material information with respect to the Mergers, rendering the Preliminary Proxy Statement false and misleading in violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The Redfield Action, the Waterman Action, and the Wilhelm Action allege similar disclosure deficiencies with respect to the Definitive Proxy Statement. The Actions seek, among other relief, an order enjoining the Mergers or rescission if the Mergers are consummated. In addition, as of the date of this Supplement, eight purported stockholders sent letters to the Company alleging similar deficiencies in the Definitive Proxy Statement, or, in some cases, the Preliminary Proxy Statement, as those noted in the above-referenced Actions (collectively, the “Demand Letters”). The Company believes that the claims in the Actions and Demand Letters are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them.
The Company vigorously denies that the Preliminary Proxy Statement or the Definitive Proxy Statement is deficient in any respect. The Company believes that the claims asserted in the Actions and Demand Letters are without merit and no further disclosure is required to supplement the Definitive Proxy Statement under applicable laws. However, solely to moot the unmeritorious disclosure claims and minimize the risk, costs, burden, nuisance and uncertainties inherent in litigation, Switch hereby supplements the disclosures contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement (the “Supplemental Disclosures”). Nothing in this Supplement will be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under any applicable laws for any of the disclosures set forth herein. The Supplemental Disclosures are set forth below and should be read in conjunction with the Definitive Proxy Statement.
2